intercollegiate athletics in the academy: seeking the
TRANSCRIPT
“We’re in the business of trying to help young people develop into independent, thinking, feeling, caring, and effective adult human beings. Conversations about the place of athletics in the academy have to take place within that context.”
--Steve Lewis President Emeritus, Carleton College
PARTICIPATION RATES
*George Washington = 5.1 percent
*George Mason = 2.7 percent
*U of Maryland = 2.1 percent
McDaniel College = 28.6 percent
*Division III average = 20 percent
PARTICIPATION RATES
median average
Division I (2) 3% 3%
Division II (8) 16% 19%
Division III (11) 28% 25%
NAIA (6) 16% 26%
Georgetown President John DeGioia
• Two competing frameworks of
excellence:
a. pursuit of boundary breaking
achievement as exhibited by faculty
looking to make new discoveries and
coaches/athletes aspiring to athletic
excellence;
b. importance of balance among
various dimensions of college life
(ideally leading to balance in later
life).
KEY CHALLENGES
- Time
- Pursuit of National Championships
- Pre-College Specialization
- Keep Up With the Jones’s
- Communication/Misperceptions
AXIOMS -No turning back the clock
-Not an Athletic Dept “problem”
-Overreliance on legislation
-Avoid checkbox mentality
-Pick battles wisely
-Importance of intentionality
WHAT TO EXPECT - Personnel: Coach Status/Contracts
- Facility/Funding Pressures
- Admissions/Financial Aid Pressures
- Over-Involved Parents
- Academic/Behavioral Issues