instrumentation (cont.) february 28 note: measurement plan due next week

42
Instrumentation (cont.) February 28 Note: Measurement Plan Due Next Week

Upload: dominic-alexander

Post on 31-Dec-2015

219 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Instrumentation (cont.) February 28 Note: Measurement Plan Due Next Week

Instrumentation (cont.)

February 28

Note: Measurement Plan Due Next Week

Page 2: Instrumentation (cont.) February 28 Note: Measurement Plan Due Next Week

Unobtrusive Measures

• Many instruments require the cooperation of the respondent in one way or another.

• An intrusion into an ongoing activity could be involved which causes a form of negativity within the respondent.

• To eliminate this, researchers use unobtrusive measures, data collection procedure that involve no intrusion into the naturally occurring course of events.

• In most cases, no instrument is used, however, good record keeping is necessary.

• They are valuable as supplements to the use of interviews and questionnaires, often providing a useful way to corroborate what more traditional data sources reveal.

Page 3: Instrumentation (cont.) February 28 Note: Measurement Plan Due Next Week

Types of Scores

• Quantitative data is reported in the form of scores• Scores are reported as either raw or derived scores

– Raw score is the initial score obtained• Taken by itself, a raw score is difficult to interpret, since it has little meaning

– Derived score are scores that have been taken from raw scores and standardized

• They enable researchers to say how well the individual performed compared to others taking the same test

• Examples include:– Age and Grade-level Equivalents– Percentile Ranks

– Standard scores are mathematically derived scores having comparable meaning on different instruments

Page 4: Instrumentation (cont.) February 28 Note: Measurement Plan Due Next Week

Four Types of Measurement Scales

Page 5: Instrumentation (cont.) February 28 Note: Measurement Plan Due Next Week

Norm-Referenced vs. Criterion-Referenced Instruments

• All derived scores give meaning to individual scores by comparing them to the scores of a group.

• The group used to determine derived scores is called the norm group and the instruments that provide such scores are referred to as norm-referenced instruments.

• An alternative to the use of achievement or performance instruments is to use a criterion-referenced test.

• This is based on a specific goal or target (criterion) for each learner to achieve.

• The difference between the two tests is that the criterion referenced tests focus more directly on instruction.

Page 6: Instrumentation (cont.) February 28 Note: Measurement Plan Due Next Week

Descriptive Statistics

Page 7: Instrumentation (cont.) February 28 Note: Measurement Plan Due Next Week

Statistics vs. Parameters

• A parameter is a characteristic of a population.– It is a numerical or graphic way to summarize data

obtained from the population

• A statistic is a characteristic of a sample.– It is a numerical or graphic way to summarize data

obtained from a sample

Page 8: Instrumentation (cont.) February 28 Note: Measurement Plan Due Next Week

Types of Numerical Data

• There are two fundamental types of numerical data:

1) Categorical data: obtained by determining the frequency of occurrences in each of several categories

2) Quantitative data: obtained by determining placement on a scale that indicates amount or degree

Page 9: Instrumentation (cont.) February 28 Note: Measurement Plan Due Next Week

Techniques for Summarizing and Presenting Quantitative Data

• Visual– Frequency Distributions– Histograms– Stem and Leaf Plots– Distribution curves

• Numerical– Central Tendency– Variability

Page 10: Instrumentation (cont.) February 28 Note: Measurement Plan Due Next Week

Summary Measures

Central Tendency

Arithmetic Mean

Median Mode

Summary Measures

Variation

Variance

Standard Deviation

Range

Page 11: Instrumentation (cont.) February 28 Note: Measurement Plan Due Next Week

Measures of Central Tendency

Central Tendency

Average (Mean) Median Mode

1

1

n

ii

N

ii

XX

n

X

N

Page 12: Instrumentation (cont.) February 28 Note: Measurement Plan Due Next Week

Mean

• The most common measure of central tendency

• Affected by extreme values (outliers)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 14

Mean = 5 Mean = 6

Page 13: Instrumentation (cont.) February 28 Note: Measurement Plan Due Next Week

Median

• Robust measure of central tendency• Not affected by extreme values

• In an Ordered array, median is the “middle” number– If n or N is odd, median is the middle number– If n or N is even, median is the average of the two

middle numbers

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 14

Median = 5 Median = 5

Page 14: Instrumentation (cont.) February 28 Note: Measurement Plan Due Next Week

Mode• A measure of central tendency• Value that occurs most often• Not affected by extreme values• Used for either numerical or categorical data• There may may be no mode• There may be several modes

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

Mode = 9

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

No Mode

Page 15: Instrumentation (cont.) February 28 Note: Measurement Plan Due Next Week

Variability

• Refers to the extent to which the scores on a quantitative variable in a distribution are spread out.

• The range represents the difference between the highest and lowest scores in a distribution.

• A five number summary reports the lowest, the first quartile, the median, the third quartile, and highest score.– Five number summaries are often portrayed graphically by the

use of box plots.

Page 16: Instrumentation (cont.) February 28 Note: Measurement Plan Due Next Week

Variance• The Variance, s2, represents the amount of variability of the

data relative to their mean• As shown below, the variance is the “average” of the

squared deviations of the observations about their mean

1

)( 22

n

xxs i

Page 17: Instrumentation (cont.) February 28 Note: Measurement Plan Due Next Week

Standard Deviation

• Considered the most useful index of variability.• It is a single number that represents the spread of a

distribution.• If a distribution is normal, then the mean plus or minus 3

SD will encompass about 99% of all scores in the distribution.

Page 18: Instrumentation (cont.) February 28 Note: Measurement Plan Due Next Week

Calculation of the Variance and Standard Deviation of a Distribution (Definitional formula)

RawScore Mean X – X (X – X)

2

85 54 31 96180 54 26 67670 54 16 25660 54 6 3655 54 1 150 54 -4 1645 54 -9 8140 54 -14 19630 54 -24 57625 54 -29 841

Variance (SD2) =

Σ(X – X)2

N-1

= 3640

9 =404.44

Standard deviation (SD) = Σ(X – X)2

N-1

Page 19: Instrumentation (cont.) February 28 Note: Measurement Plan Due Next Week

Comparing Standard Deviations

Mean = 15.5 S = 3.338 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

Data B

Data A

Mean = 15.5 S = .9258

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

Mean = 15.5 S = 4.57

Data C

Page 20: Instrumentation (cont.) February 28 Note: Measurement Plan Due Next Week

Facts about the Normal Distribution

• 50% of all the observations fall on each side of the mean.

• 68% of scores fall within 1 SD of the mean in a normal distribution.

• 27% of the observations fall between 1 and 2 SD from the mean.

• 99.7% of all scores fall within 3 SD of the mean. • This is often referred to as the 68-95-99.7 rule

Page 21: Instrumentation (cont.) February 28 Note: Measurement Plan Due Next Week

The Normal Curve

Page 22: Instrumentation (cont.) February 28 Note: Measurement Plan Due Next Week

Different Distributions Compared

Page 23: Instrumentation (cont.) February 28 Note: Measurement Plan Due Next Week

Fifty Percent of All Scores in a Normal Curve Fall on Each Side of the Mean

Page 24: Instrumentation (cont.) February 28 Note: Measurement Plan Due Next Week

Probabilities Under the Normal Curve

Page 25: Instrumentation (cont.) February 28 Note: Measurement Plan Due Next Week

Correlation

Page 26: Instrumentation (cont.) February 28 Note: Measurement Plan Due Next Week

Correlation Coefficients

• Pearson product-moment correlation– The relationship between two variables of

degree.• Positive: As one variable increases (or decreases)

so does the other.• Negative: As one variable increases the other

decreases.

– Magnitude or strength of relationship • -1.00 to +1.00

– Correlation does not equate to causation

Page 27: Instrumentation (cont.) February 28 Note: Measurement Plan Due Next Week

Positive Correlation

Page 28: Instrumentation (cont.) February 28 Note: Measurement Plan Due Next Week

Negative Correlation

Page 29: Instrumentation (cont.) February 28 Note: Measurement Plan Due Next Week

No Correlation

Page 30: Instrumentation (cont.) February 28 Note: Measurement Plan Due Next Week

Correlations

• Thickness of scatter plot determines strength of correlation, not slope of line.– For example see:

• http://noppa5.pc.helsinki.fi/koe/corr/cor7.html

• Remember correlation does not equate causation.

Page 31: Instrumentation (cont.) February 28 Note: Measurement Plan Due Next Week

Negative Correlation

Page 32: Instrumentation (cont.) February 28 Note: Measurement Plan Due Next Week

Validity and Reliability

Chapters 8

Page 33: Instrumentation (cont.) February 28 Note: Measurement Plan Due Next Week

Validity and Reliability

• Validity is an important consideration in the choice of an instrument to be used in a research investigation– It should measure what it is supposed to measure– Researchers want instruments that will allow them to make

warranted conclusions about the characteristics of the subjects they study

• Reliability is another important consideration, since researchers want consistent results from instrumentation– Consistency gives researchers confidence that the results

actually represent the achievement of the individuals involved

Page 34: Instrumentation (cont.) February 28 Note: Measurement Plan Due Next Week

Reliability

• Test-retest reliability

• Inter-rater reliability

• Parallel forms reliability

• Internal consistency (a.K.A. Cronbach’s alpha)

Page 35: Instrumentation (cont.) February 28 Note: Measurement Plan Due Next Week

Validity

• Face– Does it appear to measure what it purports to

measure?

• Content– Do the items cover the domain?

• Construct– Does it measure the unobservable attribute

that it purports to measure?

Page 36: Instrumentation (cont.) February 28 Note: Measurement Plan Due Next Week

Validity

• Criterion– Predictive – Concurrent

• Consequential

Page 37: Instrumentation (cont.) February 28 Note: Measurement Plan Due Next Week

Types of validity (cont.)

The construct

The instrument

Here the instrument samples some and only of the construct

Page 38: Instrumentation (cont.) February 28 Note: Measurement Plan Due Next Week

Types of validity

The instrument

The construct

Here the instrument samples all and more of the construct

Page 39: Instrumentation (cont.) February 28 Note: Measurement Plan Due Next Week

The construct

The instrument

Here the instrument fails to sample ANY of the construct

Page 40: Instrumentation (cont.) February 28 Note: Measurement Plan Due Next Week

The construct

The instrument

Here the instrument samples some but not all of the construct

Page 41: Instrumentation (cont.) February 28 Note: Measurement Plan Due Next Week

Perfection!

The construct and the instrument!

Page 42: Instrumentation (cont.) February 28 Note: Measurement Plan Due Next Week

Reliability and Validity