inspection and compaction testing of unbound materials a…  · web viewinspection and compaction...

6

Click here to load reader

Upload: tranduong

Post on 21-Aug-2018

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Inspection and Compaction Testing of Unbound Materials a…  · Web viewINSPECTION AND COMPACTION TESTING of UNBOUND MATERIALS. April 21, ... 878 Lump Sum Inspection and Compaction

STATE OF OHIODEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONSUPPLEMENTAL SPECIFICATION 878

INSPECTION AND COMPACTION TESTING of UNBOUND MATERIALS

April 21, 2006

878.01 Description878.02 Personnel Requirements 878.03 Field Test Methods 878.04 Test Equipment 878.05 Acceptance of Field Inspection878.06 Compaction Equipment 878.07 Notification of Non-compliance 878.08 Forms, Documentation, Monthly and Final Report878.09 Quality Assurance Testing878.10 Method of Measurement878.11 Basis of Payment

878.01 Description. This work consists of performing inspection, compaction testing and documentation for Items 203, 204, 205, 206, 304, 307, 411, 503, 603 and select granular embankment for MSE walls.

878.02 Personnel Requirements. Provide a Registered Engineer to supervise technicians’ work and act as liaison with Department personnel. Have the Registered Engineer available to discuss questions and problems which arise relative to construction, inspection and compaction testing and be available at the bimonthly progress meetings.

Provide at least one lead technician with NICET Level II, Construction Materials Testing – subfield Soils certification and 5 years relevant experience per project.

Provide technicians with NICET Level II, Construction Materials Testing – subfield Soils certification, and 2 years relevant experience, at all times for every operation requiring inspection, compaction testing and documentation. At a minimum, provide full time inspection and documentation, when unbound material is being placed.

Provide a list of all required personnel to the Engineer for acceptance 7 days prior to the work.

Until July 1, 2007, the Engineer may accept alternate personnel qualifications that document similar NICET training and relevant experience.

878.03 Field Test Methods. Perform inspections and compaction tests according to Supplement 1015. Use the online documentation forms from the Construction Inspection Manual of Procedures (http://www.dot.state.oh.us/construction/OCA/default.htm).

Use Table 1015.10-1 in Supplement 1015 Compaction Testing of Unbound Materials for the different materials, minimum testing frequencies and the appropriate test or method for controlling each material.

1

rjessberger, 03/02/06,
ODOT QC Check completed 3/2/2006 by rej
alansing, 03/02/06,
Should include forms with supplement. D2
alansing, 03/02/06,
Will this be left to District’s discretion? Or should bare minimums be stated. D2
rmorris1, 03/02/06,
This is from D-8 Note.
alansing, 03/02/06,
This is a summary of all the comments received on this specifications
Page 2: Inspection and Compaction Testing of Unbound Materials a…  · Web viewINSPECTION AND COMPACTION TESTING of UNBOUND MATERIALS. April 21, ... 878 Lump Sum Inspection and Compaction

878.04 Test Equipment. Provide the serial number, manufacturer, model number, calibration data, and frequency of calibrations for nuclear gauges. Provide documentation of the 3 block calibration (minimum every 18 months), leak tests (minimum every 6 months), and stability tests (minimum every project) for each gauge.

Perform standard counts at intervals recommended in the manufacturers operating manual and at least once a week.

Define the procedure for performing a stability check on nuclear gauges which are not within the tolerance range after the standard count and during the interval between calibrations. Standard counts derived during the stability check for stable gauges may be used in lieu of the manufacturer's standards. Do not use gauges found to be unstable until repaired and calibrated.

2

alansing, 03/02/06,
AASHTO T310 DEFINES THE STABILITY TESTS BE PERFORMED EVERY DAY. NOT EVERY WEEK.. THIS IS ALSO TRUE FOR ASTM D 2922 LW
Page 3: Inspection and Compaction Testing of Unbound Materials a…  · Web viewINSPECTION AND COMPACTION TESTING of UNBOUND MATERIALS. April 21, ... 878 Lump Sum Inspection and Compaction

878.05 Acceptance of Field Inspection. At the start of compaction operations and quality control testing, Contractor and Department personnel will perform nuclear moisture and density tests at the same location. The test results must agree before compaction operations may continue.

878.06 Compaction Equipment. Provide a list of all proposed compaction equipment including make, model, and weight or applied force at which each roller will be operated. If adding ballast to a roller, indicate the type and quantity of ballast along with the method for verifying the gross weight. Include manufacturer's specifications for the compaction capabilities for each roller or define the procedures that will be used to verify the compaction capabilities of each roller.

878.07 Notification of Non-compliance. Immediately notify the Engineer and the Contractor when any field tests note non-compliance.

878.08 Forms, Documentation, Weekly and Final Reports. Provide accurate inspection information, tests, and calculations. Report the inspection and compaction tests on Department forms defined in S-1015. Provide the inspections, compaction test results and measurements to the Engineer daily. Provide a summary of the inspections, compaction tests and measurements weekly. Include all inspections, measurements and compaction test results including failing lots, moisture checks, etc. Have the Registered Engineer sign the weekly and final reports certifying that all the inspections and compaction tests meet all the contract requirements. Submit the final report 30 days after the completion of the work.

878.09 Quality Assurance Testing. The Department will perform quality assurance (QA) tests to verify that the inspections and compaction testing conform to the Items of Work. The Department will test every 5th lot for acceptance. The tested lot will be determined at random. The lot results will be recorded. If the material does not require a compaction test, such as rock or hard shale, and it is being placed according to the specifications then the material will not be QA tested.

If the random quality assurance lot fails, the Department will test one additional lot of the original

five. If only the original lot fails, re-compact the failed lot. If the original and second lot fails, re-compact all five lots represented by the original quality assurance lot tests. Notify the Engineer when any re-compacted lot is ready for quality assurance verification.

After re-compaction, the Department will either test all five lots for acceptance or witness the testing and documentation by the field inspection personnel. If any lot fails again the Engineer will stop construction until the lead technician determines and resolves the problem and submits a plan to eliminate future problems.

878.10 Method of Measurement. The Department will not measure the Inspection and Compaction Testing of Unbound Materials.

878.11 Basis of Payment. The Department will pay the lump sum as follows:

Upon approval of the project personnel 10 %Uniform monthly progress payments 80 %Upon acceptance of the final report 10 %

The Department will pay for accepted quantities at the contract prices as follows:

Item Unit Description

878 Lump Sum Inspection and Compaction Testing of Unbound

3

alansing, 03/02/06,
Or Registered Engineer as stated in 878.07 D2
alansing, 03/02/06,
Lead technician already defined in 878.02 DM
alansing, 03/02/06,
Use of the word “either” is based on the assumption that we are retesting the same two lots that failed the first time. IF we are testing all 5 lots, the word “any” should be used. DM
alansing, 03/02/06,
The word “retest” indicates we will test the same two lots that failed before. This is slightly in conflict with the previous sentence where it says “any re-compacted lot.” If the 2nd round of testing applies to all 5 lots, we need to state that. If it is retesting the exact same two lots from the first round, we could state that more clearly and we need to change the previous sentence because we aren’t interested in just any re-compacted lot, we are only interested in 2 particular ones. DM
alansing, 03/02/06,
Do we need to spell out lifts may need to be removed and replaced if a lot is considered a lift? D2
alansing, 03/02/06,
Test one of the previous five (instead of original five) D2
alansing, 03/02/06,
Make this B. CM
alansing, 03/02/06,
New paragraph – A. Minimum Testing Requirements CM
alansing, 03/02/06,
NOT SURE HOW THIS IS IN THIS SPECIFICATION. SEEMS LIKE THIS IS A QC QA TYOE CRITERIA NOT HIRING A INSPECTOR AND REPORTING TO THE ENGINEER. LW
alansing, 03/02/06,
IF THE GAGE CAN’T BE IN THE TOLERANCE RANGE AFTER THE STANDARD COUNT WHY DO WE WANT TO MESS WITH IT?? LW
Page 4: Inspection and Compaction Testing of Unbound Materials a…  · Web viewINSPECTION AND COMPACTION TESTING of UNBOUND MATERIALS. April 21, ... 878 Lump Sum Inspection and Compaction

Materials

4

alansing, 03/02/06,
What is the purpose of the two separate specs? They are very similar. SS878 seems to cover testing for all materials, so why wouldn’t someone simply use this supplemental specification all the time instead of using one for just items 203 and 204? Would you have guidance or suggestions as when to use either of these supplements. D2
Page 5: Inspection and Compaction Testing of Unbound Materials a…  · Web viewINSPECTION AND COMPACTION TESTING of UNBOUND MATERIALS. April 21, ... 878 Lump Sum Inspection and Compaction

Designer Note: Use this note when construction personnel are limited and the District wants full time inspection and compaction testing for the work. Contact the District Construction Engineer before incorporating this note into the plans.

SS 878 and 879 are very similar specifications. SS-878 pays for the inspection and compaction testing as a lump sum pay item and covers Items 203, 204, 205, 206, 304, 307, 411, 503, 603 and MSE wall select granular embankment. SS-879 pays for the work as an incentive pay to the contract. The Contractor would be more responsible for the work under 879 but SS-879 only covers Items 203 and 204.

5

alansing, 03/02/06,
Contractor provides Inspection… Department is “hands-off” Contractors price for spring draw is too low Contractor does not report… just fills over a spring Contractor paid 104% = cost of item SS879 Embankment fails D-10
alansing, 03/02/06,
Department still performing 1 of 5 test... I think this is a BAD idea! I do not feel cost will be a saving or that a better product will be obtained D-10
alansing, 03/02/06,
203 us a Spec which need constant interpretation to fit each field condition to do such? - concrete (QC/QA) is a mow ‘cut and dry’ item D-10
alansing, 03/02/06,
Retesting requirements need clarified who checks for spring drains? D - 10
alansing, 03/02/06,
What is required in the summary report every two weeks? D2
alansing, 03/02/06,
Specifically define the bare minimums for qualified technicians. D2
alansing, 03/02/06,
How will soft subgrade / undercutting be addressed? Getting the communication to the Engineer for determining undercuts. Should this be elaborated on? And could this lead to force account work for the testing as well? D2
alansing, 03/02/06,
What Districts are already trying this...And what success have they had (or problems)? D2
alansing, 03/02/06,
In S 1015 there is a reference to AASHTO T310 and section 9.5. There is no section 9.5. Has been changed to 9.4 LW
alansing, 03/02/06,
Should there be a minimal material quantity internally established in order to use either of these specifications? D2
alansing, 03/02/06,
-Should ODOT be comparing gauges the first three days for both specs? D2
alansing, 03/02/06,
Include the forms and documentations in the supplements. D2
alansing, 03/02/06,
We assume this will not alleviate the contractor from using a spreader box (under 304). D2