inge de meyer - 31/10/2006 faculty of psychology and educational sciences – department of teaching...
TRANSCRIPT
Inge De Meyer - 31/10/2006Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences – Department of Teaching sciences
What works in Innovation in Education“Improving teaching and learning for Adults with Basic Skill
Needs through Formative Assessment”
2nd National Experts meeting
Paris, October 2006
- Flemish reflections ~ theme 1 : Empowering Learners and Communities -
Inge De Meyer - 31/10/2006Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences – Department of Teaching sciences
Theme 1: empowering learners and Communities
How are adult LLN programme objectives for teaching and learning linked to broader community
goals for integration/social inclusion, civic participation and employment? How do instructors use formative assessment approaches to address
these larger goals?
Inge De Meyer - 31/10/2006Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences – Department of Teaching sciences
Better Administrative Policy (January 1st 2006):
• 13 policy domains, three of which have a responsibility for training‣ Education and training‣ Work and social economy‣ Culture, youth, sports and media
• cooperation between the domains embedded at the level of‣ Policy decisions (Ministerial Committee on Education and Training)‣ Policy making (interdepartmental steering group)‣ Policy implementation (DIVA – Training and Alignment Information
Centre)
Inge De Meyer - 31/10/2006Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences – Department of Teaching sciences
Major objectives of the integrated education and training policy:
• stimulating lifelong and life wide learning
• strengthening the connection between education and training from the one hand and the labour market from the other hand:
‣Valorisation of competencies;‣Alignment between changing demands of competencies in the
professional world and the education and training provision;‣Possibility to gain relevant work experience;‣Etc.
Inge De Meyer - 31/10/2006Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences – Department of Teaching sciences
Adult basic education: mathematics learning trajectory
Math competencies ~ labour market demands
Inge De Meyer - 31/10/2006Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences – Department of Teaching sciences
Adult basic education: module BEWIS 07
• (standard) final goals:‣Students can compute the circumference and surface area of a circle;‣Students understand the concept “promille” (‰); ‣Students can read, note down and compute the square root of natural
numbers.
• key competencies:‣Students can solve a maths problem by switching from a specific real-
life situation to a mathematical design and vice versa;‣Students can assess their results and performances and will use
alternative learning strategies to improve their learning and achievement.
Inge De Meyer - 31/10/2006Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences – Department of Teaching sciences
Adult basic education: module BEWIS 07
• (optional) final goals ~ specific professional demands:‣Students understand the concepts “random surveys”, sample size,
frequencies and know how to construct a histogram;‣Students can draw a curve; ‣While drawing or computing angles and distances, students use the
Pythagorean theorem and the geometric proportions in right-angled triangles;‣Etc.
Inge De Meyer - 31/10/2006Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences – Department of Teaching sciences
Adult basic education: learning trajectory ~ “Dutch as a second language” modules
Inge De Meyer - 31/10/2006Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences – Department of Teaching sciences
NT2-course = part of an integration programme
NT2-course ≠ part of an integration programme
Level 1 (Breakthrough) BENT2 01 BENT2 04
BENT2 02 BENT2 05
BENT2 03 BENT2 06
BENT2 07
Level 2 (Waystage) BENT2 08
BENT2 09
BENT2 10
Inge De Meyer - 31/10/2006Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences – Department of Teaching sciences
Adult basic education: learning trajectory ~ “Dutch as a second language” modules
• final goals ~ breakthrough level (= “elementary” level):‣Students can have a social talk with strangers;‣Students can write a little note or a picture postcard.
• final goals ~ waystage level (= “survival” level):‣Students can formulate a complaint, opinion or problem in a structured
manner;‣Students can relay information in a (semi-formal) letter, invitation or
description.
Inge De Meyer - 31/10/2006Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences – Department of Teaching sciences
Inge De Meyer - 31/10/2006Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences – Department of Teaching sciences
Theme 1: empowering learners and Communities
What are the most important learning and personal outcomes in meeting goals for empowerment of
individual learners? Do instructors use formative assessment as a deliberate strategy in working
towards these outcomes?
Inge De Meyer - 31/10/2006Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences – Department of Teaching sciences
Outcomes embedded in the centres for basic education’s assignment:
• address students’ personal (educational) deficits and needs;• improve students’ self-reliance;• improve students’ employability;• improve students’ educational skills.
Learn students the basic knowledge, skills and attitudes necessary to fully participate in society or to follow further education
Inge De Meyer - 31/10/2006Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences – Department of Teaching sciences
2000: 208 adult basic education (ex-)students were questioned ~ their experiences with adult basic education
Results ~ outcomes of adult basic education:
• 55% reported large or very large benefits ~ self-reliance and life skills;
• 73% agreed adult basic education met his/her (educational) needs;
• less than 50% reported effects on their work situation;
• 30% considered adult basic education had effect on his/her educational skills or attitude towards life long learning.
Inge De Meyer - 31/10/2006Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences – Department of Teaching sciences
2000: inspection of 6 centres for adult basic education
Results ~ outcomes of their education:
“The centres perfectly respond to their students’ personal (educational) needs and focus on the improvement of their students’ coping abilities and self-image. On the other hand, they don’t sufficiently stimulate their students’ professional employability or his/her educational skills and attitudes towards lifelong learning.”