influences of class f and c fly ash blending · headwaters resources influences of class f and c...

23
Headwaters Resources Influences of Class F and C Fly Ash Blending Ben Franklin Technical Director Doug Rhodes Laboratory Manager

Upload: vantruc

Post on 06-Jun-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Influences of Class F and C Fly Ash Blending · Headwaters Resources Influences of Class F and C Fly Ash Blending Ben Franklin Technical Director Doug Rhodes Laboratory Manager 2015

Head

wate

rs R

esou

rces

Influ

ence

s of C

lass F

and

C Fl

y Ash

Blen

ding

Ben

Fran

klin

Tech

nica

l Dire

ctor

Doug

Rho

des

Labo

rato

ry M

anag

er

2015

Wo

rld

of

Co

al A

sh (

WO

CA

) C

on

fere

nce

in N

asvh

ille,

TN

- M

ay 5

-7, 2

015

htt

p:/

/ww

w.f

lyas

h.in

fo/

Page 2: Influences of Class F and C Fly Ash Blending · Headwaters Resources Influences of Class F and C Fly Ash Blending Ben Franklin Technical Director Doug Rhodes Laboratory Manager 2015

2

•In

divi

dual

mat

eria

ls a

re te

sted

for c

hem

ical

oxi

des,

par

ticle

den

sity

an

d LO

I.

•O

bjec

tives

kee

p th

e su

m o

f con

stitu

ents

bet

wee

n 72

% a

nd 7

5%.

•M

ater

ial i

s bl

ende

d to

con

form

with

AST

M C

1697

uni

form

ity ±

5.0%

.

•LO

I is

kept

bel

ow 2

.0%

.

•Av

aila

ble

Alka

lis a

re h

eld

at 1

.3%

.

•Lo

wer

the

CaO

foun

d in

Cla

ss C

ash

that

can

exa

cerb

ate

sulfa

te

atta

ck a

nd A

SR

POZZ

OLA

N B

LEN

DIN

G O

BJE

CTI

VES

Page 3: Influences of Class F and C Fly Ash Blending · Headwaters Resources Influences of Class F and C Fly Ash Blending Ben Franklin Technical Director Doug Rhodes Laboratory Manager 2015

3

AST

M C

1697

BLE

ND

ED S

UPP

LEM

ENTA

RY C

EMEN

TITI

OU

S M

ATER

IALS

APP

ENDI

X X1

VER

IFYI

NG

BLE

ND

PRO

POR

TIO

NS

•X1

.1 T

his

Appe

ndix

pro

vide

s in

form

atio

n fo

r pur

chas

ers

of b

lend

ed s

uppl

emen

tary

ce

men

titio

us m

ater

ials

abo

ut ty

pica

l m

etho

ds th

at m

anuf

actu

rers

use

to c

ontro

l th

e bl

end

prod

uctio

n pr

oces

s an

d ve

rify

prod

uct c

onfo

rman

ce.

•X1

.2 M

echa

nica

l met

hods

, suc

h as

w

eigh

ing

indi

vidu

al c

onst

ituen

ts a

s ea

ch

goes

to th

e bl

endi

ng s

yste

m a

re a

dequ

ate

to p

rovi

de p

rodu

ctio

n co

ntro

l but

che

mic

al

anal

ysis

as

desc

ribed

bel

ow is

requ

ired

by

this

spe

cific

atio

n fo

r ver

ifyin

g ac

tual

ble

nd

prop

ortio

ns:

•X1

.2.1

Ens

ure

wei

gh fe

eder

s ar

e m

aint

aine

d an

d ca

libra

ted

befo

re

prod

uctio

n. W

eigh

feed

ers

are

to p

rovi

de

for g

ener

al c

ontro

l and

adj

ustm

ent d

urin

g pr

oduc

tion.

•X1

.2.2

Ens

ure

that

the

anal

ysis

met

hod,

X-

ray

fluor

esce

nce

(XR

F) o

r oth

er

qual

ified

met

hod

is c

alib

rate

d w

ithin

the

rang

es o

f mat

eria

ls b

eing

test

ed.

X1.2

.3 S

ampl

e an

d ch

emic

ally

ana

lyze

indi

vidu

al

cons

titue

nts

befo

re p

rodu

ctio

n be

gins

and

at

esta

blis

hed

frequ

enci

es d

urin

g pr

oduc

tion.

X1.2

.4 S

ampl

e an

d ch

emic

ally

ana

lyze

fini

shed

ble

nded

su

pple

men

tary

cem

entit

ious

mat

eria

ls a

t es

tabl

ishe

d fre

quen

cies

dur

ing

prod

uctio

n ru

ns fo

r qu

ality

con

trol p

urpo

ses

and

verif

icat

ion

of b

lend

pr

opor

tions

X1.2

.5 P

ropo

rtion

ana

lysi

s, a

s us

ed h

ere,

is a

cal

cula

tion

usin

g th

e ch

emic

al a

naly

sis

of th

e in

divi

dual

co

nstit

uent

s an

d th

e re

sulta

nt b

lend

.X1

.2.5

.1 T

he in

divi

dual

con

stitu

ents

are

ana

lyze

d an

d pr

edom

inan

t ele

men

ts a

re c

hose

n as

che

mic

al

iden

tifie

rs.

X1.2

.5.2

Tho

se c

hose

n id

entif

iers

are

then

use

d to

ca

lcul

ate

the

mas

s %

of c

onst

ituen

ts in

the

blen

ded

supp

lem

enta

ry c

emen

titio

us m

ater

ial.

An e

xam

ple

of th

is c

alcu

latio

n fo

llow

s. T

his

is a

bas

ic

exam

ple

for i

llust

rativ

e pu

rpos

es u

sing

one

ele

men

t. A

mor

e de

taile

d an

alys

is u

sing

mul

tiple

ele

men

ts

can

be p

erfo

rmed

usi

ng a

spr

eads

heet

pro

gram

su

ch a

s EX

CEL

Sol

ver

Page 4: Influences of Class F and C Fly Ash Blending · Headwaters Resources Influences of Class F and C Fly Ash Blending Ben Franklin Technical Director Doug Rhodes Laboratory Manager 2015

4

Blen

ded

fly a

shes

is a

hom

ogen

eous

ble

nd o

f su

b-bi

tum

inou

s an

d bi

tum

inou

s co

al a

sh.

Com

bini

ng s

ub-b

itum

inou

s an

d bi

tum

inou

s co

al

ashe

s pr

ovid

es c

onsu

mer

s th

e po

sitiv

e at

tribu

tes

of b

oth

mat

eria

ls a

nd re

duce

s va

riatio

ns th

at a

re

som

etim

es e

xper

ienc

ed fr

om p

ower

pla

nts

oper

atin

g un

der t

oday

’s m

ore

strin

gent

en

viro

nmen

tal c

limat

e. T

he b

lend

ed fl

y as

h of

fers

en

d us

ers

mor

e be

nefit

s ve

rsus

the

sum

of t

heir

parts

. Ble

nded

fly

ashe

s ca

n be

use

d in

any

ap

plic

atio

n w

here

a C

lass

F fl

y as

h is

spe

cifie

d.

BLE

ND

ED F

LY A

SH

Page 5: Influences of Class F and C Fly Ash Blending · Headwaters Resources Influences of Class F and C Fly Ash Blending Ben Franklin Technical Director Doug Rhodes Laboratory Manager 2015

5

–A

ppen

dix

X1. V

erify

ing

Ble

nd P

ropo

rtio

ns (s

umm

ary)

.–

X1.2

Mec

hani

cal m

etho

ds …

wei

ghin

g in

divi

dual

con

stitu

ents

as

each

goe

s to

the

blen

ding

sys

tem

. . .

but c

hem

ical

ana

lysi

s as

de

scrib

ed b

elow

is re

quire

d . .

. fo

r ver

ifyin

g ac

tual

ble

nd

prop

ortio

ns.

–X1

.2.3

Sam

ple

and

chem

ical

ly a

naly

ze in

divi

dual

con

stitu

ents

be

fore

pro

duct

ion

begi

ns.

–X1

.2.4

Sam

ple

and

chem

ical

ly a

naly

ze fi

nish

ed b

lend

ed

supp

lem

enta

ry c

emen

titio

us m

ater

ials

at e

stab

lishe

d fre

quen

cies

. .

. Fo

r qua

lity

cont

rol p

urpo

ses

and

verif

icat

ion

of b

lend

pr

opor

tions

. –

X1.2

.5.2

Tho

se c

hose

n id

entif

iers

are

then

use

d to

cal

cula

te th

e m

ass

% o

f con

stitu

ents

in th

e bl

ende

d su

pple

men

tary

ce

men

titio

us m

ater

ial.

AST

M C

-169

7B

LEN

DED

SU

PPLE

MEN

TARY

CEM

ENTI

TIO

US

MAT

ERIA

LS

Page 6: Influences of Class F and C Fly Ash Blending · Headwaters Resources Influences of Class F and C Fly Ash Blending Ben Franklin Technical Director Doug Rhodes Laboratory Manager 2015

AST

M-1

697

ASTM

 C1697

‐10 Ap

pend

ix X1.2.5.2 (W

orkshe

et)

±5%

 Max

P2Va

riance

Sample

Miller

Gaston

Blen

d %  C

 | F

Theo

retical

Actual

Actual vs

Date

Sample IDs

Type

Total Sum

Total Sum

Class C

Class F

Total Sum

Total Sum

Theo

retical

7/1/13

1480

MR;  161

2GT;  165

2P2A

Mon

thly

65.73

88.91

51%

49%

77.09

77.96

1.1%

8/1/13

1723

MR;  192

1GT;  193

7P2A

Mon

thly

62.89

88.67

51%

49%

75.52

76.2

0.9%

9/1/13

2071

MR;  205

6GT;  214

3P2A

Mon

thly

62.85

87.69

51%

49%

75.02

75.78

1.0%

10/1/13

2335

MR;  229

6GT;  235

2P2A

Mon

thly

65.39

87.82

51%

49%

76.38

76.51

0.2%

11/1/13

2422

MR;  261

4GT;  257

1P2A

Mon

thly

63.61

88.83

51%

49%

75.97

76.72

1.0%

12/1/13

2680

MR;  218

GT;  44P

2AMon

thly

65.54

88.54

51%

49%

76.81

76.88

0.1%

Calculations: A

STM C16

97‐10X

1.2.5.2 lim

its +/‐5%

Page 7: Influences of Class F and C Fly Ash Blending · Headwaters Resources Influences of Class F and C Fly Ash Blending Ben Franklin Technical Director Doug Rhodes Laboratory Manager 2015

7

•In

dust

ry S

peci

ficat

ions

–AS

TM –

Amer

ican

Soc

iety

for T

estin

g M

ater

ials

AASH

TO –

Amer

ican

Ass

ocia

tion

of S

tate

Hig

hway

the

Tran

spor

tatio

n O

ffici

als

•D

OT

Spec

ifica

tions

•H

eadw

ater

s R

esou

rces

’ Sta

ndar

d O

pera

ting

Proc

edur

es

(SO

P)

VER

IFIC

ATIO

N O

F C

OM

PLIA

NC

E

Page 8: Influences of Class F and C Fly Ash Blending · Headwaters Resources Influences of Class F and C Fly Ash Blending Ben Franklin Technical Director Doug Rhodes Laboratory Manager 2015

8

BLE

ND

ING

IMPA

CT

TO C

OLO

R

Clas

s F A

shRe

sultin

g Blen

dCl

ass C

Ash

Page 9: Influences of Class F and C Fly Ash Blending · Headwaters Resources Influences of Class F and C Fly Ash Blending Ben Franklin Technical Director Doug Rhodes Laboratory Manager 2015

9

Che

mic

al

Cla

ss F

75%

F /

25%

C

50%

F /

50%

C25

% F

/ 75%

C

Cla

ss C

Silic

on D

ioxi

de, S

iO2

47.7

3%45

.26%

42.7

4%40

.85%

39.3

2%

Alu

min

um O

xide

, Al2

O3

28.1

9%25

.65%

23.2

1%21

.17%

19.2

4%

Iron

Oxi

de, F

e2O

311

.92%

10.5

1%9.

28%

8.23

%6.

22%

Sulfu

r Tri

oxid

e, S

O3

0.32

%0.

78%

1.03

%1.

27%

1.52

%

Cal

cium

Oxi

de, C

aO4.

02%

8.75

%13

.56%

18.5

1%23

.25%

Sum

Of O

xide

s (C

lass

)87

.84%

81.4

2%75

.23%

70.2

5%64

.78%

Avai

labl

e Alk

..7

51.

261.

1.9

11.

33

Car

bon

% (L

eco)

1.94

1.47

1.06

0.58

0.15

7

Spec

ific

Gra

vity

gm

/cm

32.

382.

422.

422.

462.

49

LO

I %2.

131.

571.

090.

70.

31

Fine

ness

%24

.02

24.0

223

.76

22.6

425

.1

Moi

stur

e %

0.13

0.11

0.1

0.1

0.10

6

Sum

mar

y of

Che

mic

al a

ndPh

ysic

al P

rope

rties

Page 10: Influences of Class F and C Fly Ash Blending · Headwaters Resources Influences of Class F and C Fly Ash Blending Ben Franklin Technical Director Doug Rhodes Laboratory Manager 2015

10

CO

MPR

ESSI

VE S

TREN

GTH

A

STM

C-1

09

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

Cla

ss C

75/2

550

/50

25/7

5C

lass

F

7 da

y SA

I28

Day

SAI

Page 11: Influences of Class F and C Fly Ash Blending · Headwaters Resources Influences of Class F and C Fly Ash Blending Ben Franklin Technical Director Doug Rhodes Laboratory Manager 2015

11

AST

M C

-192

CO

NC

RET

E D

ATA

Con

trol

Cla

ss C

C

lass

F

50/5

0Sl

ump

.25

inch

66

66.

5U

nit W

t lb/

ft14

5.6

146.

314

6.3

147.

1A

ir %

Pre

ssur

e6

5.5

5.2

5W

C R

atio

0.62

0.58

0.63

0.59

Tem

p. F

6565

6565

1 D

ay C

ompr

essi

ve *

* 15

0196

286

210

07

3 D

ay C

ompr

essi

ve *

*28

1922

4518

3720

887

Day

Com

pres

sive

3197

3552

2726

2813

14 D

ay C

ompr

essi

ve

3432

3513

3097

3440

28 D

ay C

ompr

essi

ve40

5842

2837

5541

3256

Day

Com

pres

sive

4580

5212

4693

5268

** 3

X6

Cyl

inde

rs a

ll ot

her a

ges 4

X8

Page 12: Influences of Class F and C Fly Ash Blending · Headwaters Resources Influences of Class F and C Fly Ash Blending Ben Franklin Technical Director Doug Rhodes Laboratory Manager 2015

12

CO

NC

RET

E ST

REN

GTH

AST

M C

-39

Page 13: Influences of Class F and C Fly Ash Blending · Headwaters Resources Influences of Class F and C Fly Ash Blending Ben Franklin Technical Director Doug Rhodes Laboratory Manager 2015

13

The b

lendin

g pro

cess

re

duce

s var

iabilit

y of

Clas

s F fly

ash f

rom

the po

wer p

lant. T

he

blend

in co

ncre

te at

a 25

perce

nt su

bstitu

tion

rate

perfo

rms b

etter

tha

n the

contr

ol mi

x an

d the

Clas

s F m

ix at

28 an

d 56 d

ays.

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

1 da

y3

days

7 da

ys14

day

s28

day

s56

Compressive PSI

Age

in D

ays

Com

pres

sive

Str

engt

h

Con

trol

Cla

ss C

Ash

50 /

50C

lass

F A

sh

CO

NC

RET

E ST

REN

GTH

Page 14: Influences of Class F and C Fly Ash Blending · Headwaters Resources Influences of Class F and C Fly Ash Blending Ben Franklin Technical Director Doug Rhodes Laboratory Manager 2015

14

SETT

ING

TIM

E O

F C

ON

CR

ETE

AST

M C

-403

Page 15: Influences of Class F and C Fly Ash Blending · Headwaters Resources Influences of Class F and C Fly Ash Blending Ben Franklin Technical Director Doug Rhodes Laboratory Manager 2015

15

ASTM

C-1

012 s

ulfate

expa

nsion

grap

h res

ults,

Clas

s C fly

ash i

s exc

eedin

g max

imum

ex

pans

ion lim

its at

six m

onths

. Blen

d doe

s not

perfo

rm as

well

as a

straig

ht Cl

ass F

ash;

howe

ver, p

erfor

ms be

tter t

han s

traigh

t Clas

s C

fly as

h.

“Tilk

asky

and C

arra

squil

lo(1

993)

; and

Dun

stan

(197

6); s

howe

d tha

t con

crete

conta

ining

some

hig

h-ca

lcium

fly as

hes a

re su

scep

tible

to su

lfate

attac

k, an

d gen

erall

y, hig

her v

olume

s of

high-

calci

um fly

ash m

ixtur

es ha

ve a

grea

ter

susc

eptib

ility t

o sulf

ate de

terior

ation

” (A

meric

an C

oncre

te Ins

titute

[ACI

], 200

8, p.

17).

Blen

ding C

with

F fly

ash m

itigate

s pro

blems

ca

used

by hi

gh C

aOC

ashe

s.

AST

M C

-101

2

0.00

0

0.02

0

0.04

0

0.06

0

0.08

0

0.10

0

0.12

0

0.14

0

1 w

k2

wk

3 w

k4w

k8

wk

13 w

k15

wk

4 m

th6

mth

Expansion %

Tim

e w

eeks

C A

shF

Ash

Blen

d

Page 16: Influences of Class F and C Fly Ash Blending · Headwaters Resources Influences of Class F and C Fly Ash Blending Ben Franklin Technical Director Doug Rhodes Laboratory Manager 2015

16

AST

M C

-156

7 D

ATA

•AS

TM C

156

7 co

mpa

rison

gra

ph

show

s th

e bl

end

outp

erfo

rms

stra

ight

Cla

ss

C’s

abi

lity

to in

hibi

t alk

ali s

ilica

reac

tivity

ex

pans

ion.

Com

bini

ng C

lass

C a

nd C

lass

F fl

y as

h cl

early

low

ers

the

perc

enta

ge o

f alk

ali

avai

labl

e in

Cla

ss C

fly

ash,

com

plim

entin

g th

e ad

vant

ages

of b

oth

prod

ucts

resu

lting

im

prov

ed c

oncr

ete

dura

bilit

y.•

Adde

d be

nefit

of a

llow

ing

conc

rete

pr

oduc

ers

to u

se h

ighe

r per

cent

ages

of f

ly

ash

in th

eir c

oncr

ete

prod

ucts

as

com

pare

d to

typi

cal C

lass

F fl

y as

hes.

Hig

her p

erce

ntag

es o

f fly

ash

repl

acem

ent,

impr

oves

con

cret

e du

rabi

lity

Page 17: Influences of Class F and C Fly Ash Blending · Headwaters Resources Influences of Class F and C Fly Ash Blending Ben Franklin Technical Director Doug Rhodes Laboratory Manager 2015

17

Comb

ining

Clas

s C

and C

lass F

fly as

h ha

s the

follo

wing

be

nefits

:

Lowe

r CaO

Lowe

r LOI

Lowe

r ava

ilable

Na2

O

Page 18: Influences of Class F and C Fly Ash Blending · Headwaters Resources Influences of Class F and C Fly Ash Blending Ben Franklin Technical Director Doug Rhodes Laboratory Manager 2015

18

•U

se o

f AST

M C

-169

7•

Perfo

rman

ce d

riven

sal

es w

ith a

sh th

at c

an b

e ta

ilore

d to

a

parti

cula

r reg

ion.

•Ab

ility

to m

aint

ain

cons

tant

sup

plie

s of

mat

eria

l.•

Poss

ibilit

y to

use

oth

er S

CM

suc

h as

Sla

g, S

ilica

Fum

e an

d na

tura

l Poz

zola

ns in

ble

nd.

•Ab

ility

to b

enef

icia

te o

ne s

ourc

e, w

ith a

noth

er o

f bet

ter

prop

ertie

s.•

Prov

ide

bina

ry p

erfo

rman

ce p

rodu

ct to

the

mar

ket f

or

sing

le s

ilo u

se.

BEN

EFIT

S C

/F B

LEN

DS

Page 19: Influences of Class F and C Fly Ash Blending · Headwaters Resources Influences of Class F and C Fly Ash Blending Ben Franklin Technical Director Doug Rhodes Laboratory Manager 2015

19

•Fl

orid

a•

Geo

rgia

•Al

abam

a•

Tenn

esse

e•

Kent

ucky

•Pe

nnsy

lvan

ia•

Loui

sian

a•

Mis

siss

ippi

•C

olor

ado

C-A

SH &

F-A

SH D

OT

PRE

BLE

ND

APP

RO

VALS

Page 20: Influences of Class F and C Fly Ash Blending · Headwaters Resources Influences of Class F and C Fly Ash Blending Ben Franklin Technical Director Doug Rhodes Laboratory Manager 2015

20

IOW

A D

OT

PER

MEA

BIL

ITY

DAT

A•

Iow

a D

OT

unde

rtook

a s

tudy

on

pavi

ng p

erfo

rman

ce to

m

easu

re p

erm

eabi

lity

of a

ll al

low

ed s

tate

pav

ing

mix

ture

s ut

ilizin

g SC

M a

vaila

ble

in th

e m

arke

t and

on

curre

nt

proj

ects

.•

Cla

ss F

is o

nly

avai

labl

e lo

cally

as

a co

mpo

nent

of a

lo

cally

pro

duce

d ce

men

t ble

nd. T

he b

lend

con

tain

s 20

%

clas

s F

fly a

sh.

•Io

wa

DO

T al

low

s fo

r the

pav

ing

mix

ture

to u

tiliz

e up

to a

40

% re

plac

emen

t of c

emen

t.•

Loca

l pav

ers

rout

inel

y us

e th

e 20

% F

cem

ent b

lend

with

20

% C

lass

C fl

y as

h, w

ith th

e re

sult

prov

idin

g fa

ster

set

tim

e in

coo

l wea

ther

and

low

er p

erm

eabi

lity.

Page 21: Influences of Class F and C Fly Ash Blending · Headwaters Resources Influences of Class F and C Fly Ash Blending Ben Franklin Technical Director Doug Rhodes Laboratory Manager 2015

21

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

100%

Cem

ent

15%

C A

sh30

% C

Ash

Type

IS(2

5)20

% C

Ash

Type

IS(3

5)15

% C

Ash

Type

IPF(

25)

20%

C A

sh

Coulombs

Tern

ary

Mix

Des

ign

-Lab

Stu

dyPe

rmea

bilit

y A

ASH

TO T

277

-Virg

inia

Cur

e M

etho

d

>400

0

H

igh

2000

-400

0

Mod

erat

e10

00-2

000

Lo

w10

0-10

00

Ver

y Lo

w<1

00

N

eglig

ible

w/c

= 0

.41

w/c

= 0

.41

w/c

= 0

.41

w/c

= 0

.41

w/c

= 0

.426

w/c

= 0

.40

Page 22: Influences of Class F and C Fly Ash Blending · Headwaters Resources Influences of Class F and C Fly Ash Blending Ben Franklin Technical Director Doug Rhodes Laboratory Manager 2015

22

•Ph

ysic

al P

erfo

rman

ce im

prov

ed o

n te

sted

ash

es.

•U

tiliz

atio

n of

Mar

gina

l Ash

es E

nhan

ced.

•AS

R M

itiga

tion

of B

lend

ed C

/F fl

y as

hes

impr

oved

ove

r C

lass

C fl

y as

h al

one.

•Pe

rmea

bilit

y's

wer

e re

duce

d si

mila

r to

the

use

of s

ilica

fum

e.•

Res

ultin

g bl

ends

of c

lass

C a

nd c

lass

F fl

y as

hes,

mee

t AS

TM C

-618

.

SUM

MA

RY O

F FI

ND

ING

S

Page 23: Influences of Class F and C Fly Ash Blending · Headwaters Resources Influences of Class F and C Fly Ash Blending Ben Franklin Technical Director Doug Rhodes Laboratory Manager 2015

23

•Am

eric

an C

oncr

ete

Inst

itute

. (20

08).

Man

ual o

f con

cret

e pr

actic

e: U

se o

f fly

ash

in c

oncr

ete

com

mitt

ee-2

32.

Farm

ingt

on H

ills, M

I: Au

thor

.

•AS

TM C

39.

(200

0). S

tand

ard

test

met

hod

for c

ompr

essi

ve s

treng

th o

f cyl

indr

ical

con

cret

e sp

ecim

ens.

In R

. Alle

n, N

. Ba

ldin

i, E.

Gut

man

, E. K

eefe

, J. K

ram

er,

& C

. Lei

nweb

er e

t al.

Ann

ual B

ook

of A

STM

sta

ndar

ds: V

ol. 0

4.02

. C

oncr

ete

and

aggr

egat

es. W

est C

onsh

ohoc

ken,

PA:

Am

eric

an s

ocie

ty fo

r tes

ting

and

mat

eria

ls.

•AS

TM C

109

. (20

00).

Stan

dard

test

met

hod

for c

ompr

essi

ve s

treng

th o

f hyd

raul

ic c

emen

t mor

tars

(Usi

ng 2

-in. o

r [5

0-m

m] c

ube

spec

imen

s. In

R. A

llen,

N. B

aldi

ni, E

. Gut

man

, E. K

eefe

, J. K

ram

er,

& C

. Lei

nweb

er e

t al.

Ann

ual

Boo

k of

AS

TM s

tand

ards

: Vol

. 04.

01. C

emen

t;lim

e;gy

psum

. Wes

t Con

shoh

ocke

n, P

A: A

mer

ican

soc

iety

for t

estin

g an

d m

ater

ials

•AS

TM C

618

. (20

00).

Stan

dard

spe

cific

atio

n fo

r coa

l fly

ash

and

raw

or c

alci

ned

natu

ral p

ozzo

lan

for u

se a

s a

min

eral

adm

ixtu

re in

con

cret

e. In

R. A

llen,

N. B

aldi

ni, E

. Gut

man

, E. K

eefe

, J. K

ram

er,

& C

. Lei

nweb

er e

t al.

Ann

ual

Boo

k of

AS

TM s

tand

ards

: Vol

. 04.

02. C

oncr

ete

and

aggr

egat

es. W

est C

onsh

ohoc

ken,

PA:

Am

eric

an s

ocie

ty fo

r te

stin

g an

d m

ater

ials

.

•AS

TM C

101

2. (2

000)

. Sta

ndar

d te

st m

etho

d fo

r len

gth

chan

ge o

f hyd

raul

ic-c

emen

t mor

tars

exp

osed

to a

sul

fate

so

lutio

n In

R. A

llen,

N. B

aldi

ni, E

. Gut

man

, E. K

eefe

, J. K

ram

er,

& C

. Lei

nweb

er e

t al.

Ann

ual B

ook

of A

STM

S

tand

ards

: Vol

. 04.

01. C

emen

t; lim

e; g

ypsu

m. W

est C

onsh

ohoc

ken,

PA:

Am

eric

an s

ocie

ty fo

r tes

ting

and

mat

eria

ls.

•AS

TM C

156

7. (2

004)

. Sta

ndar

d te

st m

etho

d fo

r det

erm

inin

g th

e po

tent

ial a

lkal

i-silic

a re

activ

ity o

f com

bina

tions

of

cem

entit

ious

mat

eria

ls a

nd a

ggre

gate

. Ann

ual B

ook

of A

STM

sta

ndar

ds: V

ol. 0

4.02

. Con

cret

e an

d ag

greg

ates

. Wes

t C

onsh

ohoc

ken,

PA:

Am

eric

an s

ocie

ty fo

r tes

ting

and

mat

eria

ls

•AS

TM C

169

7. (2

010)

. Ble

nded

sup

plem

enta

ry c

emen

titio

us m

ater

ials

. Ann

ual B

ook

of A

STM

sta

ndar

ds: V

ol. 0

4.02

. C

emen

t,lim

e, g

ypsu

m .

Wes

t Con

shoh

ocke

n, P

A: A

mer

ican

soc

iety

for t

estin

g an

d m

ater

ials

•G

ratta

n-Be

llew,

P. E

. (19

87).

Con

cret

e al

kali-

aggr

egat

e re

actio

ns. P

ark

Rid

ge, N

J: N

oyes

Pub

licat

ions

.

REF

EREN

CES