infant cereal program in nunavut: what can we do better?

32
Infant Cereal Program in Nunavut: What Can We do Better? Vesselina Petkova, RD Territorial Coordinator, Canada Prenatal Nutrition Program (CPNP)

Upload: homer

Post on 11-Jan-2016

27 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Infant Cereal Program in Nunavut: What Can We do Better?. Vesselina Petkova, RD Territorial Coordinator, Canada Prenatal Nutrition Program (CPNP). Introduction. No disclosures or conflicts of interest - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Infant Cereal Program  in Nunavut:  What Can We do Better?

Infant Cereal Program in Nunavut:

What Can We do Better?Vesselina Petkova, RD

Territorial Coordinator,Canada Prenatal Nutrition Program (CPNP)

Page 2: Infant Cereal Program  in Nunavut:  What Can We do Better?

Introduction

• No disclosures or conflicts of interest• Will discuss process, barriers, and some

outcomes related to infant cereal program implementation

• Project in progress– Not an example of a perfect program– Sometimes more questions than answers– Share with you and get feedback

Page 3: Infant Cereal Program  in Nunavut:  What Can We do Better?

What is Iron Deficiency Anemia• When low iron in the system = iron deficiency anemia (IDA)

– Ferritin is the measure of body’s iron storage– Low iron store if ferritin < 12 ng/mL

• Lack of iron interferes with ability to create haemoglobin (Hg)– Anemia when Hg less than 2 s.d.– Usually when Hg < 110 g / L

• Hg responsible for distributing oxygen to tissue, including heart and brain

ᐊᐅᐸᖅᑐᑦᐊᐅᑦ

ᐊᐅᐸᖅᑐᑦ ᐊᐅᑦ ᐊᒡᔭᕐᓯᔨᐅᕗᑦ

ᐊᓂᕐᓂᖃᕐᓇᖅᑐᒥᒃ

Page 4: Infant Cereal Program  in Nunavut:  What Can We do Better?

Why does IDA matter

• Negatively affects billions worldwide• Affects cognition, psychomotor development,

work productivity and community capacity• High economic burden– Highest costing disease (other than TB)

• Generally preventable• Damage caused by IDA can be permanent if not

reversed early

Page 5: Infant Cereal Program  in Nunavut:  What Can We do Better?

Infant Risk factors for IDA include:• Pregnancy outcomes (mothers’ anemic, low birth

weight, premature infants)• Rapid growth – infancy (6-24 m.o.)• Nutrition behaviours / poor intake of iron:– Early discontinuation of breastfeeding – Poor nutritional status (food insecurity, low SES)– Low iron formula – Excessive / early cow’s milk intake– Delayed / improper introduction of solids

Page 6: Infant Cereal Program  in Nunavut:  What Can We do Better?

Is it a problem in Nunavut?

• At least 250 cases of anemia in children (0-5) managed and treated annually.– ~ 50 cases per 1000 children/year (~ 5 %)

• True burden of the disease?– Vast majority of patients are asymptomatic.– Tip of the iceberg phenomenon

Page 7: Infant Cereal Program  in Nunavut:  What Can We do Better?

Many more unknown cases?• Population screening provides proper prevalence.– No screening protocol implemented across the Territory.

• Prevalence in Igloolik: – 48% had anemia – 28% had IDA - up to 8 x national averages!– 53% depleted iron stores

Christofides 2005

Page 8: Infant Cereal Program  in Nunavut:  What Can We do Better?

Infant Screening in Iqaluit

% of infants who are anemic (Hg below 110 g/L)

37,5

62,5

anemic

non anemic

• 6 m.o. - 5 y.o. • 2006 – May 2010• N = 677, but 1291 readings

Page 9: Infant Cereal Program  in Nunavut:  What Can We do Better?

70% of anemia is mild

Page 10: Infant Cereal Program  in Nunavut:  What Can We do Better?

Anemia by age group

Age in Months

Page 11: Infant Cereal Program  in Nunavut:  What Can We do Better?

Summary Iqaluit Anemia Screening

• Prevalence rates are very high– Highest at 8 – 11 months. – If analysis is limited to infants < 24 months, then

42.7% of infants were anemic.– Majority is mild. – But 17% of the children had at least one reading

below 100 g/L (moderate anemia)

Page 12: Infant Cereal Program  in Nunavut:  What Can We do Better?

Venous Draws

• Only 53 / 118 (~45%) patients went for venous blood work to confirm diagnosis

• 30% of those who went for blood work did not have a ferritin done to establish iron storage

Page 13: Infant Cereal Program  in Nunavut:  What Can We do Better?

Infant Cereal Supplementation

1. Context and Background2. Plan 3. Process4. Outcomes and Feedback

Page 14: Infant Cereal Program  in Nunavut:  What Can We do Better?

Objective: Reduce the Prevalence of IDA in Infants and Children• Step 1: identify IDA as a public

health priority– “By 2013, the rate of anemia in infants and toddlers will be halved”

• Step 2: commit to a focused strategy in order to address it– IDA program

Page 15: Infant Cereal Program  in Nunavut:  What Can We do Better?
Page 16: Infant Cereal Program  in Nunavut:  What Can We do Better?

Nunavut Iron Deficiency Anemia Project Evaluation Strategy 2008

Page 17: Infant Cereal Program  in Nunavut:  What Can We do Better?

Food-Based Intervention OptionsConsidered ease of implementation, safety profile of a product, cost, and availability.

1. Fresh meats, including country food2. Jarred meats distribution

3. Infant cereal distribution4. Vitamin supplementation

Page 18: Infant Cereal Program  in Nunavut:  What Can We do Better?

Project Goals1. Provide iron-fortified infant cereal to Nunavut

infants from 6-12 months of age, in quantity sufficient to meet the Recommended Dietary Allowance of 11 mg/day for iron.

2. Deliver cereal to infants via collaboration between community-based CPNP projects and Health Centers

3. Determine if iron-fortified infant cereal is acceptable to mothers and infants.

Page 19: Infant Cereal Program  in Nunavut:  What Can We do Better?

Implementation1st phase: 2009-2010 • Provision of cereal– Through CPNP community based programs, with

support of local Health Centers– 15 communities around Nunavut

• Order and distribution of cereal– Partnership with Northwest Company

Page 20: Infant Cereal Program  in Nunavut:  What Can We do Better?

Cost and Funding

• Need: average of 3 boxes per month per child x 6 months

• Cost of cereal: ~ $5/box (incl. shipping)• ~ $ 90 per child• Total cost: $60,000 provided by CPNP– CPNP workers’ time and wages not included

Page 21: Infant Cereal Program  in Nunavut:  What Can We do Better?

Educational information

Page 22: Infant Cereal Program  in Nunavut:  What Can We do Better?

Evaluation of 1st Phase

• Feedback from CPNP workers and mothers who received cereal.

• Process:– # of boxes of cereal distributed– # of users & who used cereal– perspective of CPNP workers

• Acceptability of cereal

Page 23: Infant Cereal Program  in Nunavut:  What Can We do Better?

Outcomes• All 15 communities received cereal.• Very few provided detailed information on

distribution – Systematic tracking wasn’t implemented– Some workers simply stated – ‘most’ distributed

• Also not clear on the number of users• Unexpected issues related to program success

such as Heinz recall of unrelated product

Page 24: Infant Cereal Program  in Nunavut:  What Can We do Better?

CPNP Workers’ Perspective

• Most centers found the program easy to administer

• A request for ‘not so much paper work’– Asked to track how many users and how many boxes

distributed at a time

• “I got it but never opened it… I didn’t know what to do with it”

Page 25: Infant Cereal Program  in Nunavut:  What Can We do Better?

CPNP Workers’ Perspective• There was a major stress with where to keep

the cereal stock• General request for fewer boxes– Knowing there is an expiry date – Feeling responsible for complete distribution

Page 26: Infant Cereal Program  in Nunavut:  What Can We do Better?

Acceptable to Children?

• 50% like, 30% neutral, 20% dislike taste – Some mothers say children won’t eat it– “My child doesn’t like the flavor, can we get

flavored?”• 50% of mothers admit to sharing cereal

with other members of household– Typically sibling outside age group

Page 27: Infant Cereal Program  in Nunavut:  What Can We do Better?

Acceptable to Mothers?• 100% mothers support CPNP program to

continue• 75% would purchase cereal if availableFeedback from CPNP workers: – “some mothers feel uncomfortable taking the

cereal… almost implying they were poor and couldn’t afford the cereal”

– Felt that some mothers used it but not as the predominant infant food source

Page 28: Infant Cereal Program  in Nunavut:  What Can We do Better?
Page 29: Infant Cereal Program  in Nunavut:  What Can We do Better?

Summary• Iron fortified infant cereal is one part of

decreasing iron deficiency anemia amongst infants

• Program helps with broader goals of food security

• Accepted by most mothers and infants• General support for program and its continuation

Page 30: Infant Cereal Program  in Nunavut:  What Can We do Better?

Next Steps• Fully implement cereal program – In all communities– Integrated in regular CPNP programming– Address barriers (storage, summer break...)

• Continue to develop education and communication strategy

• Evaluate health outcomes– implementation of screening program

Page 31: Infant Cereal Program  in Nunavut:  What Can We do Better?

Next Steps

• How to better integrate program with health centre?

• How to integrate with local store?

• Are there locally sustainable options using country food?

• What to do with anemia that is NOT iron deficiency?

Page 32: Infant Cereal Program  in Nunavut:  What Can We do Better?

Thanks to:CPNP community workersMothers who provided feedback

V. Avinashi S. Zlotkin

Public Health Nutritionists R. JettyG. Osborne

CPNP