incoherent scatter radar as a tool for m-i coupling studies ian mccrea jackie davies sstd rutherford...

71
Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

Upload: arnold-shaw

Post on 14-Jan-2016

218 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies

Ian McCreaJackie Davies

SSTDRutherford Appleton

LaboratoryChilton,

Oxfordshire UK

Page 2: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

Structure of this talk

• Why study the magnetosphere with radars ?– What can IS radars do ?– What can’t they do ?– What other toys do we need ?

• Cluster in particular– What did we start out to do ?– What have we actually done ?– What kind of science has come out ?– What do we still need to do ?

• What’s next ?– THEMIS, MMS and Cross-Scale– AMISR and EISCAT-3D

Page 3: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

Why study the magnetosphere from the ground ?

• Converging field geometry projects very diverse regions to small areas: Ai ~ Am * (Bm/Bi)

• Measure boundaries and boundary conditions (e.g. conductivities, heating rates)

• Possibility for conjugate observations and time history of a field line

• Resolution of spatial and temporal effects

Page 5: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

Strengths of ISRs• Backscatter is continuous in

range

• Continuous time series allows study of dynamics

• Steerability and flexible pulse-coding allow great freedom in experiment design

• Multi-parameter data sheds light on various aspects of MI processes

• Standard interpretation of features (OCB, PIFs etc)

Moen et al, Ann. Geophys., 22, 1973, 2004

Page 6: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

Weaknesses of ISRs

• Limited by SNR, especially at long range

• Assumptions may not always work (non-thermals, composition)

• Limited viewing area, so lack of spatial context.

• Velocity determination not good in far field

• Ambiguity in moving events

Lockwood et al, Nature 361, 424, 1993

Lockwood et al, PSS, 36, 1229, 1988

Page 7: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

Weaknesses of ISRs

• Limited by SNR, especially at long range

• Assumptions may not always work (non-thermals, composition)

• Limited viewing area, so lack of spatial context.

• Velocity determination not good in far field

• Ambiguity in moving events

Lockwood et al, Nature 361, 424, 1993

Page 8: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

Weaknesses of ISRs• Limited by SNR, especially

at long range.

• Assumptions may not always work (non-thermals, composition)

• Limited viewing area, so lack of spatial context.

• Velocity determination not good in far field

• Ambiguity in moving events

Lockwood et al, Nature 361, 424, 1993

Page 9: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

The Necessity of SUPERDARN

Page 10: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

ISR and SUPERDARN observations are different, but strongly complementary

Both have their own strengths and weaknesses

Davies et al, Ann. Geophys., 20, 781, 2002

Page 11: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

More from the toolbox

Combination of ISR and imager data shows correspondence of optical and radar features

Assimilative electrodynamics from magnetometers etc, and combination with ISR data

Lühr et al, Ann. Geophys, 14, 162, 1996

Carlson et al, GRL, 33, L05103, 2006

Page 12: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

Cluster Science Topics

• Magnetopause reconnection and Flux Transfer Events 

• Dynamics and structure of the cusp region

• Wave-particle interaction in the cusp

• Formation and properties of the LLBL

• Large-scale waves at the flank magnetopause

• Particle acceleration during magnetotail reconnection

• Dynamics and properties of magnetotail current sheet

• Physics of  magnetospheric substorms

• Structure of  flux ropes in the magnetotail

Page 13: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

The Original Modes

Page 14: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

Cluster 1: June 4th 1996

Page 15: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

ESR 500MHz ISR

Page 16: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

ESR Cluster Experiments

• Uses 32m dish and interleaved 42m (4:1)• 42m dish is fixed field-aligned (az 182o, el 81o)• Cusp conjunctions use 32m radar in LowElNorth

mode (az 336o, el 30o)• Tail conjunctions often use 32m radar in

LowElSouth mode (az 167.7o, el 30o)• Tau0 modulation alternating code 20 s baud• Basic range resolution 3.0 km (~30 km in F-

region)• Basic time resolution 6.4s• Range coverage 119 To 1366 km• Mag. Latitude coverage 76o To 80o (Low El North)• Mag. Latitude coverage 74o To 67o (Low El South)

Page 17: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

Tromso VHF Radar, 224 MHz ISR

Page 18: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

VHF Cluster Experiments

• Radar pointed geographic north (azimuth 359.5o, 30o elevation)

• Dual beam experiments initially • Tau1 modulation scheme• Alternating code experiment (baud 24s)• Basic range resolution 3.6 km (typically 20 km in

F-region)• Altitude Coverage 77km to 1268 km• Mag. Latitude Coverage (67.7oN) 73oN to 80oN• Basic time resolution 5s (60s in analysis)• Standard analysis by GUISDAP

Page 19: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

Cusp Sector:March 16 2006

• Footprints generally over Svalbard, or further North

• Emphasis on latitudinal coverage, flow transients etc.

• ESR continues latitude coverage north of VHF viewing area

• ESR field-aligned data provide a second perspective on plasma passing over Svalbard

Page 20: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

Cusp Sector:March 16 2006

• February to April each year

• Emphasis on magnetopause crossings

• Conjugacy with Tromsø/ESR

• 4-hour experiments

• Consistency with SUPERDARN

• Hand-on to Sondy

• >70 EISCAT/Cluster cusp experiments since 2001

Page 21: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

Cusp Sector Modes:

ESR Low El North, VHF Dual Beam CP4

Page 22: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK
Page 23: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

Cusp Sector Modes:

ESR Low El North, VHF Single Beam CP4

Page 24: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

Cusp Sector Modes

T

L

Tromsø

Range coverage 151 to 2100 km

Height coverage 77 to 1268 km

Mag lat coverage (67) 73 – 80oN

Geo lat coverage (73) 76 – 83oN

ESR

Range coverage 148 – 1295 km

Height coverage 76 – 737 km

Mag lat coverage 76o – 80o

Geog lat coverage 79o – 84o

Page 25: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

Multi-radar dataPoleward Moving Forms4 October 2002

K.A. McWilliams, University of Saskatchewan

Page 26: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

Tail Conjunction Modes

• Footprints generally between Svalbard and Tromsø

• Emphasis on coverage of auroral region

• VHF beam covers some latitudes north of ESR • ESR covers some latitudes sourth of VHF viewing area

• ESR field-aligned data see e.g. plasma emerging from polar cap

Page 27: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

Tail Conjunction Modes:

ESR Low El South, VHF Dual Beam CP4

Page 28: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

Tail Conjunction Modes:

ESR Low El South, VHF Single Beam CP4

Page 29: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

Tail Conjunction Modes

TromsøRange coverage 151 to 2100

kmHeight coverage 77 to 1268 kmMag lat coverage (67) 73o – 80o

Geo lat coverage (73) 76o – 83o

ESRRange coverage 148 – 1295 kmHeight coverage 76 – 737 kmESR mag lat coverage 74o-67o

ESR geog lat coverage 77o-69o T

L

Page 30: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

Perigee Passes

• Occur at all times of year

• Generally 2-3 suitable passes a month

• Frequently we do not cover these

• Same mode as cusp sector passes

• Should we do more ?

Page 31: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

Flank Skimming/Flank Crossing Orbits

• Occur in the summer and winter

• Oriented for phenomena such as waves on the flanks

• Same mode as cusp sector passes

• Less frequent runs and less scientific interest in these months ?

Page 32: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

Sondrestrom ISR1300 MHz

3 MW

32 m dish

Page 33: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

Sondrestrom/Cluster Experiments

Page 34: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

First Cluster Cusp Encounter

• First Cluster pass through the ionospheric cusp

• a) Magnetic field at ACE satellite orbiting upstream of the Earth at the Lagrange point

• d) Energy of the particles observed by Cluster

• b) and c) Ionosphere as seen by the radar in particular, strongly enhanced high density features (red) are clearly visible moving away from the radar

Page 35: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

Polar Cap Patches under Bz South

Lockwood et al, Ann. Geophys., 19, 1589, 2001a

• Cluster outbound from tail lobe to dusk sector mantle

• ESR sees poleward-moving patches, repetition frequency ~ 10 minutes

• DMSP sees dispersed ion and electron signatures

• Patches also pass over Cluster

• Good correlation of low energy precipitation at EISCAT and low-energy sheath electrons at Cluster

• Suggests a mechanism more complex than time elapsed since reconnection for controlling soft particle flux

Page 36: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

Reconnection under High Clock Angle

Lockwood et al, Ann. Geophys, 19, 1613, 2001b• IMF turns north at 0945 (1100 at

ionosphere)

• Remains generally north, with excursions to intermediate clock angle

• Cluster moving outbound through magnetosheath, with transient excursions into LLBL and cusp

• Excursions coincide with clock angle swings

• Poleward-moving transients seen at these times by ESR

• Could be FTEs - not classical signatures, due to position in interior cusp ?

Page 37: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

Pulsed Reconnection in By dominated IMF

Wild et al, Ann. Geophys., 23, 2903 2005• Combines in-situ observations of pulsed reconnection by Cluster and Double Star.

• Pulsed flows directed poleward and dawnward

• Flux tubes anchored at mid-latitude and close to sub-solar point

• Reconnection not limited to high latitudes in By dominated IMF

Page 38: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

• Cluster/FAST/Sondy/SUPERDARN

• Transient reconnection signatures at three altitudes

• Cluster goes from cusp to boundary layer during a pressure pulse

• Flow bursts seen at Cluster interpreted as Alfven waves in reconnection events

• FAST sees stepped cusp signatures correspond to flow bursts

• Sondy sees flow bursts poleward of convection reversal boundary

• OCB equatorward of CRB

• Momentum transfer in downstream boundary layer ?

Conjugate Reconnection at Multiple Heights

Farrugia et al, Ann Geophys, 22, 2891, 2004

Page 39: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

Electrodynamics of Auroral Arcs

Aikio et al, Ann. Geophys., 22, 4089, 2004• Cluster in midnight sector at 4 RE

• Pseudo-breakup onset occurs

• Current sheets of equatorward arc widen and FAC doubles in < 2 mins

• Density cavity forms in the downward current region of poleward arc

• Pedersen current decreased, return current region forms a growing load for current circuit

• Electrons carrying return current accelerated and region widens to supply required amount of return current

• Evidence of Alfven wave acceleration of electrons in the upward FAC

Page 40: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

Halloween StormRosenqvist et al, JGR 110, 2004JA010927

Page 42: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

The Future:THEMIS, Cluster and the ISRs

Page 43: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

The Future:MMS and Cross-Scale

Page 44: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

The Future:The KuaFu Mission

Page 46: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

EISCAT-3DEISCAT-3D Possible new sites

Possible new baseline

Transmitter site

69.4 N 30.0 E

69.58 N 19.22 E

68.2 N 14.3 E

~67 N

• A common transmitter facility with RX capabilities: A common transmitter facility with RX capabilities:

– Close to the present Tromsø (NO) EISCAT siteClose to the present Tromsø (NO) EISCAT site– Operating frequency in the (225-240) MHz rangeOperating frequency in the (225-240) MHz range– Power amplifiers utilising VHF TV power FETs Power amplifiers utilising VHF TV power FETs – Phased-array system with > 16 K elements, PPhased-array system with > 16 K elements, Ppkpk > 2 > 2

MWMW– Actual antenna configuration and performance TBD Actual antenna configuration and performance TBD – >3 outlier, RX-only array modules for >3 outlier, RX-only array modules for

interferometryinterferometry– Fully digital, post-sampling beam-forming on Fully digital, post-sampling beam-forming on

receivereceive– Comprehensive interferometric capabilities built-inComprehensive interferometric capabilities built-in

• 2 + 2 very large receive-only (”remote”) arrays:2 + 2 very large receive-only (”remote”) arrays:

– Actual siting TBD, four promising sites Actual siting TBD, four promising sites investigated...investigated...

– Filled apertures, long enough to provide ~ 1 km Filled apertures, long enough to provide ~ 1 km beam resolution at E region altitudes above beam resolution at E region altitudes above transmittertransmitter

– Medium gain (~ 10 dBi) element antennasMedium gain (~ 10 dBi) element antennas– Fully digital, post-sampling beam-formingFully digital, post-sampling beam-forming– Sufficient local signal processing power to generate Sufficient local signal processing power to generate

at least five simultaneous beamsat least five simultaneous beams– 10 Gb/s connections for data transfer and remote 10 Gb/s connections for data transfer and remote

control and monitoringcontrol and monitoring

Present idea of the EISCAT 3D system geometry. The central core (denoted by a green filled circle) is assumed to be located near the present Norwegian EISCAT site at Ramfjordmoen. The dashed circle with a radius of approximately 250 km indicates the approximate extent of the central core FOW at 300 km altitude. Receiving sites located near Porjus (Sweden) and Kaamanen (Finland) provide 3D coverage over the (250-800) km height range, while two additional sites near Abisko (Sweden) and Masi (Norway) cover the (70-300) km height range.

Page 47: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

The EISCAT_3D Test Array The EISCAT_3D Test Array (“Demonstrator”)(“Demonstrator”)

• 200 m200 m22 filled array now being erected at EISCAT Kiruna filled array now being erected at EISCAT Kiruna site to provide facilities for validating several critical site to provide facilities for validating several critical aspects of a full-scale 3D receiving array in practice under aspects of a full-scale 3D receiving array in practice under realistic climatic conditions: realistic climatic conditions:

– Receiver front ends, A/D conversion (WP 4), Receiver front ends, A/D conversion (WP 4), – SERDES, copper/optical/copper conversion (WP 12),SERDES, copper/optical/copper conversion (WP 12),– Time-delay beam-steering (WP4 / WP9),Time-delay beam-steering (WP4 / WP9),– Simultaneous forming of multiple beams (WP 9),Simultaneous forming of multiple beams (WP 9),– Adaptive pointing (self-) calibration (WP 9),Adaptive pointing (self-) calibration (WP 9),– Adaptive polarisation matching (WP 9),Adaptive polarisation matching (WP 9),– Interferometry trigger processor (WP 5),Interferometry trigger processor (WP 5),– Digital back-end / correlator for standard IS (WP 9),Digital back-end / correlator for standard IS (WP 9),– Time-keeping (WP12)Time-keeping (WP12)

•• Array oriented in Tro-Kir Array oriented in Tro-Kir plane; plane; 48 short (6+6) element 48 short (6+6) element Yagis at Yagis at 5555oo elevation,elevation,

•• Center frequency of (224 ± Center frequency of (224 ± 3) 3) MHz allows reception of MHz allows reception of transmissions from existing transmissions from existing Tromsø VHF system.SNR Tromsø VHF system.SNR estimated to be sufficient for estimated to be sufficient for useful bistatic IS work (> 6% @ useful bistatic IS work (> 6% @

300 km, 1.0 10300 km, 1.0 101111 m m-3-3),),

• • The 55The 55oo elevation provides elevation provides coverage from ~ 200 km coverage from ~ 200 km

altitude altitude to over 800 km above to over 800 km above Tromsø.Tromsø.

D

D cos D sin

R1

R4

R12

N

D selected to make ( D sin ) optimal stacking distance

BEAM

DIRECTION

Page 48: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

Conclusion

• CGBWG is helping to assemble a unique set of radar data for MI coupling studies (credit to Jim Wild, Gareth Chisham, Steve Milan and many others)

• Huge thanks are due to the staff at EISCAT and Sondy !

• All ISR data are on-line via Madrigal – http://www.openmadrigal.org/

• Cluster Ground-Based Working Group– http://www.ion.le.ac.uk/~cluster

• Feedback needed: – What else should the ISRs be doing ?– Are these the right modes ?– What modes are needed to support new missions ?

Page 49: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

The End !!

Page 50: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK
Page 51: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK
Page 52: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK
Page 53: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK
Page 54: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK
Page 55: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK
Page 56: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

What can IS radars do ?

• Add Lockwood slides – point out usefulness for dynamics, boundaries, temperature gives time history etc.

Page 57: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK
Page 58: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

AA Operations in 2006

0

10

20

30

40

Jan

Mar

May Ju

lSep Nov

Ch

arg

ed

Ho

urs

KST

ESR

Page 59: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK
Page 60: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK
Page 61: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK
Page 62: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK
Page 63: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK
Page 64: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK
Page 65: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK
Page 66: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK
Page 67: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK
Page 68: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK
Page 69: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK
Page 70: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

First Cluster Cusp Encounter

Page 71: Incoherent Scatter Radar as a tool for M-I coupling studies Ian McCrea Jackie Davies SSTD Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton, Oxfordshire UK

Wild et al 2005