incident-management in central arkansas federal-aid project number: itsr(001)
TRANSCRIPT
Incident-Management Incident-Management In Central ArkansasIn Central Arkansas
Federal-aid Project Number: ITSR(001)Federal-aid Project Number: ITSR(001)
Incident-Management Incident-Management In Central ArkansasIn Central Arkansas
Federal-aid Project Number: ITSR(001)Federal-aid Project Number: ITSR(001)
2
Motorist
sAn Integrated and Shared SystemAn Integrated and Shared System
IncidentS
ystem
Operator
s
3
Incident Management ActivitiesIncident Management Activities
• Motorist Assistance Patrol– 3 vehicles operating on I-30, I-40, I-630, I-430, and I-440 in the urbanized
area.– Proposed to provide some coverage of both US 67/167 and I-530, from I-30
to Dixon Road • Towing and Wrecker Service
– A rotation list of qualified towing and wrecker services.– Current procedures do not specify a minimum response time.
• Emergency Medical Services (EMS)– 911 calls– Communications upgrades are needed.
• Traffic Management at Work Zones– Queue detectors – Variable message signs (VMS) and highway advisory radio (HAR)
• Traveler Information System– 511 calls
4
Goals of Our StudyGoals of Our Study
Model the distribution of incidents .
Investigate advanced incident detection techniques
Choose the appropriate incident-response strategies
Perform Benefit/Cost (B/C) analysis
5
6
Incident Data of Arkansas Arkansas State Police Report (2000 ~ 2003)
Incident Data of Arkansas Arkansas State Police Report (2000 ~ 2003)
rural or urban type of collisions
weekdays light conditions
roadway alignment
roadway profile
weather alcohol involvement
crash
severity
road system counties larger municipalities
Frequency
7
Assistant Parts
Incidents
Others
GPS/GIS
VC# Programming
Internal Inform
ation S
ystem
TransCAD Server
GISDK Script Programming
Up
date M
apSQL Database
Output PlatformsWeb ApplicationASP.NET programming
Core:1. Planning Model2. Operating Model
Architecture of Software System Architecture of Software System
8
SIMAN
Dynamic shortest path EMS
fleet assignment & demand coverage
MRM (Multicriteria Routing Module)
DRA(Dynamic Routing Algorithm)
SIMANI (Stochastic Incident-Management of Asymmetric Network-Workload – Integrated)
9
Incident Management ModelIncident Management Model
• Functions1. Provide a good tactic to allocate available response vehicles to serve reported incidents.2. Pay attention to potential incidents in ensuring a certain level of reliability in delivering quality service.3. The model helps to reduce the negative impact of incidents as much as possible.
• Algorithm SIMAN
10Potential workload at f =40
10
4030
50f(1)
v(2)
2
1
Reported & potential IncidentsReported & potential Incidents
Risk = 20%
Workload = 3×20 min
Potential workload at v=20
Delay at f = 80 min
11
Comparison between Rotation and SIMAN
Rotation SIMAN
Total Number of Vehicle Dispatches
66,757 66,757
Total Delay Cost (veh-min) 259,787,280.00 208,343,664.00
Mean of Work Time (min) 34.54 27.90
Standard Deviation of Work Time (min)
11.18 9.51
12
Multicriteria Routing Module
1
6
2
4
3
5
7
8
0
1215
13
11
9
10
14
13
Operational Model – Dynamic Routing
Operational Model – Dynamic Routing
15
10
10
15
CBA
0
5
10
15 35
2525
IntermediateStarting Arrival
20 35
14
Arkansas Crash Data for 2003
Fatal Injury PDO Fatalities Injuries
557 28,125 42,222 641 52,474
15
Users
Motorists
Operators Managerscxv
Environment
Travel Time
Incidents
System
Data Input & Analysis
Core Algorithms
Output Platforms
Functional Structure of the Prototype Incident Command Center
16
Technical Partners (in alphabetical order)
• Gary Dalporto, Joseph Heflin, & Sandra Otto, FHWA• Scott Bennett, Mark Bradley, Marc Maurer & Alan
Meadors, AHTD• Karen Bonds, AR State Police• David Taylor & Brian Nation, Arkansas Department of
Health and Human Services• Casey Covington, Minh Le, Richard Magee, & Jim
McKenzie, Metroplan• Bill Henry & Jerry Simpson, City of Little Rock• Doug Babb, Routh Towing Service
17
Key Team Members
• Gregory Browning • Yupo Chan • Isabel Farrel • Adeyemi Fowe • Jian Hu • Heath McKoin • Weihua Xiao • Ildeniz Yayla
18
Publications
• Hu, J. and Chan, Y., “A Multi-criteria Routing Model for Incident Management,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on SMC, Sept. 2005, Hawaii, pp. 832-839.
• Hu, J. and Chan, Y., “Stochastic Incident-Management of Asymmetrical Network-Workloads,” TRB Pre-print 06-1596, 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C. January 22-26, 2006.
• Hu, J. and Chan, Y. "A Dynamic Shortest-Path Algorithm for Continuous Arc Travel-Times: Implication for Traffic Incident Management.” Pre-print 08-0756, 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C. January 13-17, 2008.
• Hu, J. and Chan, Y. "Dynamic Routing To Minimize Travel Time And Incident Risks", Paper No. 485, 10th International Conference on Applications of Advanced Technologies in Transportation, Athens, Greece, 27-30, May, 2008.
19
Thanks. Any Question?Thanks. Any Question?
http://syen.ualr.edu/metalab
20
Planning & Operational ModelsPlanning & Operational Models
• Functions1. Provide incident managers with best strategies to respond to an incident2. Assist motorists on re-routing around incidents, and incident response operators on dispatching response vehicles.
• Two Algorithms1. Multi-Criteria Optimization (as a planning tool): Paper: Hu, J. and Chan, Y. (2005), “A Multi-criteria Routing Model for Incident Management,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on SMC, Sept., Hawaii, pp. 832-839.
2. Dynamic Routing (as an operational tool):Paper: Hu, J. and Chan, Y. (2006), “Dynamic Routing to Minimize Travel Times and Incident Risks,” Accepted for presentation and Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on the Application of Advanced Technologies in Transportation, ASCE, Chicago, IL, August, 2006.
21
Schedule of Incident ServiceSchedule of Incident Service
Dispatch time
Incident Occurrence
Incident Notified
Response Unit
Assignment
Response Unit Arrives at
Scene
Detection time
Response vehicle travel time
Incident clear time
Work time
Response time
Incident Restoration
22
Planning Model – Multicriteria OptimizationPlanning Model – Multicriteria Optimization
• Four Criteria1) Distance Distance It has implications on operating cost, including oil price. 2) Travel Time:Travel Time: It is tied to operating cost and response time.3) Variance in Travel Time: Variance in Travel Time: It measures the travel time reliability..4) Risk Index: Risk Index: Risk exposure is an indicator of highway safety..
• Objective FunctionMinimize Wt 1 × Tour Dist + Wt 2 × Travel Time + Wt 3 × Var + Wt 4 × Risk Indx
NOTE:1) Weight 1 + Weight 2 + Weight 3 + Weight 4 = 12) The model yields all viable (dominant) routings for all weights.
23
Dominant ToursDominant Tours
Wt.Set
Tour Original Tour Dist.Expected
TimeTime Variance Risk Index
10-11-
10-15-00-12-11-8-9-10-
9-8-11-12-0-15-039.02 41.76 6.92 0.681
20-10-
11-15-00-12-11-8-9-10-
14-12-0-15-039.72 41.25 6.02 0.564
30-10-
11-15-00-12-14-10-14-
12-11-12-0-15-043.56 44.10 5.74 0.568
40-10-
11-15-00-12-14-10-9-8-
11-13-7-15-042.83 44.74 6.57 0.563
24
Path Dist, Time, Var & Risk on Network Path Dist, Time, Var & Risk on Network
NODES 0 10 11 15
0 ----
0.7595 0.7256 0.5231 0.4971
0.2840 0.2888 0.2312 0.3450
0.2405 0.2500 0.2168 0.1608
10
0.7595 0.7256 0.5231 0.4971
----
0.4409 0.4612 0.5520 0.4942
1.0000 0.9756 0.7399 0.6579
11
0.2840 0.2888 0.2312 0.3450
0.4409 0.4612 0.5520 0.4942
----
0.5245 0.5388 0.4480 0.5058
15
0.2405 0.2500 0.2168 0.1608
1.0000 0.9756 0.7399 0.6579
0.5245 0.5388 0.4480 0.5058
----
25
An ExampleAn Example
26
Objective functionObjective function
Fi Lj
N
kijk
Fiii
j
xHTCMIN1
Delay CostDelay CostFor each incident in the networkDelay Cost = Cost × Delay
Cost = Traffic Volume (Vehicle)Delay = Work Time (Minute)
fixed costs for fixed costs for dispatching response dispatching response
vehiclesvehicles
= Number of response vehicles × Unit cost to dispatch a vehicle
27
10
4030
50f(1)
v(2)
2
1
Incident parametersIncident parameters
λ Z1 Z2 Z3 Z4 Z5
f(1) 0.0142 0.718 0.192 0.070 0.019 0.000
v(2) 0.0046 0.594 0.246 0.101 0.055 0.004
Df Dv --------- 1×20 2×20 3×20 4×20 5×20
Wf=3×20
Cf=80 Cv=100 Jf=70 Jv=40 H=20 K=5
28
Node v(2)
Node f(1)
10
4030
50f(1)
v(2)
2
1
Incident workloadIncident workload
R t0 t1 t2 t3 t4
0.2 15.69 86.81 ∞ ∞ ∞
R t0 t1 t2 t3 t4
0.2 48.22 146.4 ∞ ∞ ∞
Wf=3×20 Cf=80 Cv=100 Jf=70 Jv=40 H=20 K=5
29
Operational Model – Dynamic Routing
Operational Model – Dynamic Routing
• Improved Feature:
1) Time-dependent travel time
2) Measuring of Incident Risk using Poisson Processes and Queuing Theory
3) Allowing waiting at nodes along the path
4) Incident risks are combined into the shortest path algorithm as paroxysmal delays, which are incorporated as part of the travel time.
30
ATIS Architecture
31
Work in Progress: Incident DetectionWork in Progress: Incident Detection
32
Functional ICC/TMC
33
Administrative RemarksAdministrative Remarks
• UALR is upgrading equipment (as additional matching)
• Your guidance is necessary in designing the Software architecture
• Need More Information:1) Time-dependent Travel Time for each Highways2) Details on the current practice in servicing an incident3) Information on the available Towing Truck Companies