in the united states bankruptcy court for the...

167
SECOND AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDED PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP 4842-6525-0690.16 THIS IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF ACCEPTANCE OR REJECTION OF THE PLAN. ACCEPTANCE OR REJECTIONS MAY NOT BE SOLICITED UNTIL A DISCLOSURE STATEMENT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE BANKRUPTCY COURT. THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT IS BEING SUBMITTED TO THE BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR APPROVAL BUT HAS NOT YET BEEN APPROVED BY THE BANKRUPTCY COURT. IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUBBOCK DIVISION IN RE: REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al. 1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11 Jointly Administered FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDED JOINT PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP (DATED: September 3, 2019 MARCUS A. HELT C. ASHLEY ELLIS FOLEY GARDERE FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 2021 McKinney Avenue, Suite 1600 Dallas, Texas 75201 Telephone: (214) 999.3000 Fax: (214) 999.4667 Email: [email protected] [email protected] ATTORNEYS FOR DEBTORS AND DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSION 1 The following Debtors are jointly administrated: Reagor-Dykes Imports, LP (Case No. 18-50215), Reagor-Dykes Amarillo, LP (Case No. 18-50216), Reagor-Dykes Auto Company, LP (Case No. 18-50217), Reagor-Dykes Plainview, LP (Case No. 18-50218), and Reagor-Dykes Floydada, LP (Case No. 18-50219), Reagor-Dykes II, LLC (Case No. 18-50323), Reagor-Dykes III, LLC (Case No. 18-50322), Reagor Auto Mall I LLC (Case No. 18-50325), Reagor Auto Mall, Ltd. (Case No. 18-50324), Reagor-Dykes Snyder, L.P. (Case No. 18-50321). Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 1 of 68

Upload: others

Post on 03-Aug-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP 4842-6525-0690.16

THIS IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF ACCEPTANCE OR REJECTION OF THE PLAN. ACCEPTANCE OR REJECTIONS MAY NOT BE SOLICITED UNTIL A DISCLOSURE STATEMENT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE BANKRUPTCY COURT. THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT IS BEING SUBMITTED TO THE BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR APPROVAL BUT HAS NOT YET BEEN APPROVED BY THE BANKRUPTCY COURT.

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUBBOCK DIVISION

IN RE:

REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1

Debtors.

§ §§§ §

Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11 Jointly Administered

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDED JOINT PLAN OF

REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP

(DATED: September 3, 2019

MARCUS A. HELT

C. ASHLEY ELLIS

FOLEY GARDERE FOLEY & LARDNER LLP

2021 McKinney Avenue, Suite 1600 Dallas, Texas 75201

Telephone: (214) 999.3000 Fax: (214) 999.4667

Email: [email protected]@foley.com

ATTORNEYS FOR DEBTORS AND DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSION

1 The following Debtors are jointly administrated: Reagor-Dykes Imports, LP (Case No. 18-50215), Reagor-Dykes Amarillo, LP (Case No. 18-50216), Reagor-Dykes Auto Company, LP (Case No. 18-50217), Reagor-Dykes Plainview, LP (Case No. 18-50218), and Reagor-Dykes Floydada, LP (Case No. 18-50219), Reagor-Dykes II, LLC (Case No. 18-50323), Reagor-Dykes III, LLC (Case No. 18-50322), Reagor Auto Mall I LLC (Case No. 18-50325), Reagor Auto Mall, Ltd. (Case No. 18-50324), Reagor-Dykes Snyder, L.P. (Case No. 18-50321).

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 1 of 68

Page 2: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

Page | i4842-6525-0690.16

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

DISCLAIMERS ......................................................................................................................... 1

Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements ............................................................... 3ARTICLE I INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 4

Section 1.1 Voting Procedure ............................................................................................................... 5 Section 1.2 Explanation of Chapter 11 ............................................................................................... 7 Section 1.3 Rules of Interpretation ...................................................................................................... 9 Section 1.4 Recommendation of the Proponents to Approve the Plan ....................................... 10

ARTICLE II Summary ............................................................................................................................... 11 Section 2.1 Alternative Paths to Confirmation ................................................................................ 11 Section 2.2 Plan and Treatment of Claims – Restructuring Alternative. Under the Restructuring Alternative, the Plan will effectuate a reorganization of the Dealerships, the business, and the operations. Pursuant to the terms of the Plan and a Restructuring: ............... 12 Section 2.3 Plan and Treatment of Claims – Liquidation Alternative. Under the Liquidation Alternative, the Plan will effectuate an orderly wind down of the Debtors’ business operations, a controlled liquidation of all Collateral, and the transfer of all Causes of Action to the Liquidation Trust. Pursuant to the terms of the Plan and the Liquidation Alternative: ............. 16

ARTICLE III HISTORICAL BACKGROUND AND PREPETITION BUSINESS OPERATIONS ........................................................................................................................................... 27

Section 3.1 GP Debtors ....................................................................................................................... 27 Section 3.2 LP Debtors ........................................................................................................................ 27

Factors Precipitating the Filing of These Chapter 11 Cases ................................................... 28ARTICLE IV MEANS FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLAN: RESTRUCTURING ALTERNATIVE ........................................................................................................................................ 29 ARTICLE V MEANS FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLAN: LIQUIDATION ALTERNATIVE ........................................................................................................................................ 30 ARTICLE VI ASSETS OF THE DEBTORS ON THE PETITION DATE ................................. 31

Section 6.1 Debtors’ Assets ................................................................................................................ 31 Section 6.2 Claims and Causes of Action of Debtors ..................................................................... 36

ARTICLE VII LIABILITIES OF THE DEBTORS ........................................................................... 40 Section 7.1 Administrative Claims: All Debtors .............................................................................. 40 Section 7.2 Scheduled and Known Secured and Priority Claims, Pending Litigation ................ 42 Section 7.3 Unsecured Claims ............................................................................................................ 47

ARTICLE VIII SUMMARY OF KEY MATTERS ARISING DURING THE CHAPTER 11 CASES .......................................................................................................................................................... 47

Section 8.1 Commencement of the Debtors’ Cases ........................................................................ 47 Section 8.2 Employment of the Chief Restructuring Officer ........................................................ 48 Section 8.3 Auction of Assets Held by Original Debtors ............................................................... 48 Section 8.4 Consumer Protection Efforts ......................................................................................... 48 Section 8.5 Global Negotiations ......................................................................................................... 48

ARTICLE IX ACCEPTANCE AND CONFIRMATION OF THE PLAN .................................. 49 Section 9.1 Requirements for Confirmation ..................................................................................... 49

ARTICLE X LIQUIDATION ANALYSIS........................................................................................... 52

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 2 of 68

Page 3: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

Page | ii4842-6525-0690.16

ARTICLE XI VOTING PROCEDURES ............................................................................................. 54 Section 11.1 Classes Entitled to Vote on the Plan ............................................................................ 54 Section 11.2 Persons Entitled to Vote on the Plan ........................................................................... 54 Section 11.3 Vote Required for Class Acceptance ............................................................................ 55 Section 11.4 Voting Instructions .......................................................................................................... 55 Section 11.5 Disputed and Unliquidated Claims ............................................................................... 56 Section 11.6 Possible Reclassification of Creditors and Interest Holders ..................................... 57

ARTICLE XII CRAMDOWN OR MODIFICATION OF THE PLAN ........................................ 57 Section 12.1 “Cramdown:” Request for Relief under Section 1129(b) .......................................... 57 Section 12.2 The Plan Meets the “Best-Interest-of-Creditors” Test .............................................. 58 Section 12.3 The Plan Meets the Cramdown Standard with Respect to Any Impaired Class of Claims Rejecting the Plan ...................................................................................................................... 58 Section 12.4 Modification or Revocation of the Plan; Severability ................................................. 58

ARTICLE XIII RISK FACTORS ............................................................................................................ 59 Section 13.1 Factors Relating to Chapter 11 and Restructuring via the Plan ................................ 59 Section 13.2 Insufficient Acceptances ................................................................................................. 60 Section 13.3 Lack of Material Recoveries on the Causes of Action ............................................... 61

ARTICLE XIV CERTAIN FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE PLAN 61 ARTICLE XV RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLAN PROPONENTS .................................. 63

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 3 of 68

Page 4: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

Page | iii4842-6525-0690.16

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES

Page(s)

Federal Statutes

United States Code Title 11 ................................................................................................................. Page | 4

United States Code Title 28 Chapter 123 ........................................................................................ Page | 32

Bankruptcy Code § 102 ................................................................................................................................................. Page | 9 § 326 ............................................................................................................................................... Page | 40 § 362 ................................................................................................................................................. Page | 7 § 506 ............................................................................................................................................... Page | 21 § 506(b) ....................................................................................................................... Page | 21, Page | 45 §§ 1101, 1107 and 1108 ................................................................................................................. Page | 7 §§ 1107 and 1108 ............................................................................................................................ Page | 4 § 1121(d) .......................................................................................................................................... Page | 7 § 1122 .......................................................................................................................... Page | 37, Page | 43 § 1123(b) ........................................................................................................................................ Page | 30 § 1124 ............................................................................................................................................. Page | 41 § 1126(g) ........................................................................................................................................ Page | 41 § 1127 ............................................................................................................................................. Page | 45 § 1129 ..................................................................................... Page | 7, Page | 10, Page | 37, Page | 44 § 1129(a) ....................................................................................................Page | 8, Page | 37, Page | 44 § 1129(a)(9) ................................................................................................................. Page | 21, Page | 38 § 1129(b) ............................................................. Page | 8, Page | 38, Page | 42, Page | 44, Page | 46

BANKRUPTCY CODE § 1145 ............................................................................................................................................... Page | 2

Code § 503(b) .......................................................................................................................................... Page | 32 § 507(a)(1) ...................................................................................................................................... Page | 32 § 1111(b) ........................................................................................................................................ Page | 38 § 1129(b)(2) ................................................................................................................................... Page | 45

Securities Act § 27A ................................................................................................................................................ Page | 3

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 § 21E ................................................................................................................................................ Page | 3

UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 .................................................................................. Page | 2

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 4 of 68

Page 5: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

Page | iv4842-6525-0690.16

State Statutes

Bankruptcy Rule 3018 ........................................................................................................................ Page | 43

Bankruptcy Rule 3018(a) .................................................................................................................... Page | 43

Bankruptcy Rule 9006(a) ...................................................................................................................... Page | 9

EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT A – CHAPTER 11 PLAN

EXHIBIT B – REORGANIZATION PROJECTIONS/POST-CONFIRMATION BUSINESS PLAN

EXHIBIT C – LIQUIDATION ANALYSIS

EXHIBIT D – FORM OF ORDER APPROVING DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

EXHIBIT E – CAUSES OF ACTION

EXHIBIT F – LAWSUIT STYLED INTERNATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE V. FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY, LLC A/K/A FORD MOTOR COMPANY, CASE NO. 5:19-CV-00137-C FILED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, LUBBOCK DIVISION

EXHIBIT G – EXECUTIVE BIO OF RON BLAYLOCK

EXHIBIT H – CURRENT BALANCE SHEET

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 5 of 68

Page 6: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 14842-6525-0690.16

DISCLAIMERS

THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT CONTAINS A SUMMARY OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OFTHE PLAN OF REORGANIZATION OF THE DEBTORS AND DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSIONUNDER CHAPTER 11 OF THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY CODE, A COPY OFWHICH IS ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT A, PROPOSED BY THE DEBTORS IN THESECHAPTER 11 CASES. THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT ALSO CONTAINS SUMMARIES OFCERTAIN OTHER DOCUMENTS RELATING TO THE CONSUMMATION OF THE PLANOR THE TREATMENT OF CLAIMS AND INTERESTS AND CERTAIN FINANCIALINORMATION RELATING THERETO.

THE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT INCLUDES CERTAIN EXHIBITS, EACH OF WHICH AREINCORPORATED INTO AND MADE A PART OF THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT AS IFSET FORTH IN FULL HEREIN. THE STATEMENTS AND OTHER INFORMATIONCONTAINED IN THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT WERE MADE AS OF THE DATEHEREOF, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. HOLDERS OF CLAIMS AND INTERESTSREVIEWING THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT SHOULD NOT INFER THAT THE FACTSSET FORTH HEREIN ARE ACCURATE AS OF ANY DATE OTHER THAN THE DATE SETFORTH ON THE COVER PAGE HEREOF. HOLDERS OF CLAIMS AND INTERESTS MUSTRELY ON THEIR OWN EVALUATION OF THE DEBTORS AND THEIR OWN ANALYSISOF THE TERMS OF THE PLAN IN DECIDING WHETHER TO ACCEPT OR REJECT THEPLAN.

ALL HOLDERS OF CLAIMS AND INTERESTS ENTITLED TO VOTE ON THE PLAN AREENCOURAGED TO READ AND CAREFULLY CONSIDER THIS ENTIRE DISCLOSURESTATEMENT, INCLUDING THE RISK FACTORS CITED HEREIN AND THE PLANATTACHED HERETO, BEFORE VOTING TO ACCEPT OR REJECT THE PLAN.

THE DEBTORS ARE PROVIDING THE INFORMATION IN THE DISCLOSURESTATEMENT SOLELY FOR PURPOSES OF SOLICITING HOLDERS OF CLAIMS ANDINTERESTS TO ACCEPT OR REJECT THE PLAN. NOTHING IN THIS DISCLOSURESTATEMENT MAY BE USED BY ANY PERSON FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE. THE CONTENTS OF THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT SHALL NOT BE DEEMED AS PROVIDING ANY LEGAL, FINANCIAL, SECURITIES, TAX, OR BUSINESS ADVICE. THE DEBTORS URGE EACH HOLDER OF A CLAIM OR INTEREST TO CONSULT WITH ITS OWN ADVISORS WITH RESPECT TO ANY SUCH LEGAL, FINANCIAL, SECURITIES, TAX, OR BUSINESS ADVICE IN REVIEWING THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT AND THE PLAN. MOREOVER, THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE, AND MAY NOT BE CONSTRUED AS AN ADMISSION OF FACT, LIABILITY, STIPULATION, OR WAIVER. THE SUMMARY OF THE PLAN AND OTHER DOCUMENTS DESCRIBED IN THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT ARE QUALIFIED IN THEIR ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO THE ACTUAL DOCUMENTS THEMSELVES AND THE EXHIBITS THERETO.

THE DEBTORS BELIEVE THAT THE INFORMATION HEREIN IS ACCURATE BUT ARE UNABLE TO WARRANT THAT THE INFROMATION IS WITHOUT ANY INACCURACY OR OMISSION. THE DEBTORS HAVE NOT AUTHORIZED ANY PARTY TO GIVE ANY

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 6 of 68

Page 7: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 24842-6525-0690.16

INFORMATION ABOUT OR CONCERNING THE PLAN OR THE DEBTORS OR THE VALUE OF THEIR PROPERTY, OTHER THAN AS SET FORTH IN THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. HOLDERS OF CLAIMS AND INTERESTS SHOULD NOT RELY UPON ANY OTHER INFORMATION, REPRESENTATIONS, OR INDUCEMENTS MADE TO OBTAIN ACCEPTANCE OR REJECTION OF THE PLAN.

THE BANKRUPTCY COURT’S APPROVAL OF THE ADEQUACY OF THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE THE BANKRUPTCY COURT’S APPROVAL OF THE PLAN. NEITHER THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT NOR THE PLAN HAS BEEN FILED WITH OR REVIEWED BY THE UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, OR ANY SECURITIES REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF ANY STATE UNDER ANY STATE SECURITIES LAW, THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT AND THE PLAN HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE SECURITY EXCHANGE COMMISSION (“SEC”) OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION. NEITHER THE SEC NOR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION HAS PASSED UPON THE ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN OR THEREIN. NEITHER THE OFFER NOR THE SALE OF ANY SECURITIES PURSUANT TO THE PLAN HAS BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OR ANY SIMILAR STATE SECURITIES OR “BLUE SKY” LAWS. ANY SUCH OFFER OR SALE IS BEING MADE IN RELIANCE ON THE EXEMPTIONS FROM REGISTRATION THEREUNDER SPECIFIED IN SECTION 1145 OF THE BANKRUPTCY CODE.

THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT SUMMARIZES CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE PLAN, CERTAIN OTHER DOCUMENTS, AND CERTAIN FINANCIAL INFORMATION. THE DEBTORS BELIEVE THAT THESE SUMMARIES ARE FAIR AND ACCURATE. IN THE EVENT OF ANY INCONSISTENCY OR DISCREPANCY BETWEEN A DESCRIPTION CONTAINED IN THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT AND THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS OF THE PLAN OR THE OTHER DOCUMENTS OR FINANCIAL INFORMATION INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE, THE PLAN, OR SUCH OTHER DOCUMENTS, AS APPLICABLE, SHALL GOVERN FOR ALL PURPOSES.

EACH HOLDER OF AN IMPAIRED CLAIM OR AN IMPAIRED INTEREST THAT IS ALLOWED TO VOTE SHOULD REVIEW THE ENTIRE PLAN BEFORE CASTING A BALLOT. NO PARTY IS AUTHORIZED BY THE BANKRUPTCY COURT TO PROVIDE ANY INFORMATION WITH RESPECT TO THE PLAN OTHER THAN THAT CONTAINED IN THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT.

INFORMATION INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT SPEAKS AS OF THE DATE OF SUCH INFORMATION OR THE DATE OF THE REPORT OR DOCUMENT IN WHICH SUCH INFORMATION IS CONTAINED OR AS OF A PRIOR DATE AS MAY BE SPECIFIED IN SUCH REPORT OR DOCUMENT. ANY STATEMENT CONTAINED IN A DOCUMENT INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE HEREIN SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE MODIFIED OR SUPERSEDED FOR ALL PURPOSES TO THE EXTENT THAT A STATEMENT CONTAINED IN THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT OR IN ANY OTHER SUBSEQUENTLY FILED DOCUMENT WHICH IS ALSO INCORPORATED OR DEEMED TO BE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE, MODIFIES

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 7 of 68

Page 8: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 34842-6525-0690.16

OR SUPERSEDES SUCH STATEMENT. ANY STATEMENT SO MODIFIED OR SUPERSEDED SHALL NOT BE DEEMED, EXCEPT AS SO MODIFIED OR SUPERSEDED, TO CONSTITUTE A PART OF THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT.

SOME ASSUMPTIONS INEVITABLY WILL NOT MATERIALIZE. FURTHER, EVENTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OCCURRING SUBSEQUENT TO THE DATE ON WHICH THE FINANCIAL PROJECTIONS WERE PREPARED MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THOSE ASSUMED OR, ALTERNATIVELY, MAY HAVE BEEN UNANTICIPATED, AND, THUS, THE OCCURRENCE OF THESE EVENTS MAY AFFECT FINANCIAL RESULTS IN A MATERIALLY ADVERSE OR MATERIALLY BENEFICIAL MANNER. THEREFORE, THE FINANCIAL PROJECTIONS MAY NOT BE RELIED UPON AS A GUARANTEE OR OTHER ASSURANCE OF THE ACTUAL RESULTS THAT WILL OCCUR.

*******

DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Disclosure Statement contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this Disclosure Statement that address activities, events or developments that the Debtors expect, project, believe or anticipate will or may occur in the future are forward-looking statements. These statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology including “may,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “continue,” “foresee,” “project,” “could,” or other similar words. These forward-looking statements may include, but are not limited to, references to procedures in connection with the Debtors’ bankruptcy cases and the distribution of the Debtors’ assets pursuant to the Plan, the Debtors’ financial projections and liquidation analysis, and the Debtors’ future operating results. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance. The Debtors have based these statements on the Debtors’ assumptions and analyses in light of the Debtors’ experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other factors the Debtors believe are appropriate in the circumstances. No assurance can be given that these assumptions are accurate. Moreover, these statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties.

All subsequent written and oral forward looking information attributable to the Debtors is expressly qualified in its entirety by the foregoing. In light of these risks, uncertainties, and assumptions, the events anticipated by the Debtors’ forward-looking statements may not occur, and you should not place any undue reliance on any of the Debtors’ forward-looking statements. The Debtors’ forward-looking statements speak only as of the date made and the Debtors undertake no obligation to update or revise their forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 8 of 68

Page 9: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 44842-6525-0690.16

ARTICLE I INTRODUCTION

Henry Resources is the primary investor in the Auto Investment Group, which will be the primary investor in the Plan Sponsor (defined in the Plan). The Henry Family and the Auto Investment Group care about the great people of West Texas and are excited about the opportunity to rebuild customer loyalty, creditor relationships, and employment opportunities in West Texas through the proposed chapter 11 plan. As a result, The Auto Investment Group led by Henry Resources and others has agreed to support the plan, subject to certain conditions precedent and approvals, and believes that a collaborative exit from bankruptcy is in the best interests of the bankruptcy estates, the creditors of the bankruptcy estates, the manufacturers, the retail lenders, the floorplan lenders, potential employees of the Reorganized Debtors, and the great people of West Texas.

The Auto Investment Group led by Henry Resources looks forward and is committed to using best efforts to work with the creditors and manufacturers (e.g., Ford Motor, General Motors, Toyota, and Mitsubishi) in these cases up to and past the confirmation hearing on a possible consensual bankruptcy for the benefit of all involved. At the same time, The Auto Investment Group will also work with its investors to receive approvals and capital commitments, subject to the conditions precedent to the Effective Date of the Plan, for the group’s share of the equity financing proposed in the Plan. The Debtors will file a notice with the Bankruptcy Court when they receive word from the Auto Investment Group that it has such commitments.

This Disclosure Statement (“Disclosure Statement”) and the accompanying Ballots are being furnished to you, the holders of Claims against and Interests in the Chapter 11 debtors Reagor Dykes Motors, LP, Reagor-Dykes Imports, LP, Reagor-Dykes Amarillo, LP, Reagor-Dykes Auto Company, LP, Reagor-Dykes Floydada, LP, Reagor-Dykes Plainview, LP, Reagor-Dykes Snyder, L.P., Reagor Auto Mall, Ltd., Reagor-Dykes Auto Mall I LLC, Reagor-Dykes II, LLC, and Reagor-Dykes III, LLC (together, the “Debtors” or “Plan Proponents”), pursuant to Section 1125 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in connection with the solicitation of ballots for the acceptance of the Second Amended Plan of Reorganization (the “Plan”) proposed by the Debtors under chapter 11 (“Chapter 11”) of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”).

Capitalized terms used in this Disclosure Statement and not defined herein shall have their respective meanings as defined in the Plan or, if not defined in the Plan, as defined in the Bankruptcy Code.

On August 1, 2018, Debtors Reagor-Dykes Motors, LP, Reagor-Dykes Imports, LP, Reagor-Dykes Amarillo, LP, Reagor-Dykes Auto Company, LP, Reagor-Dykes Floydada, LP, and Reagor-Dykes Plainview, LP (collectively, the “Original Debtors”) filed voluntary petitions under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of Texas, Lubbock Division (the “Bankruptcy Court”).

On November 2, 2018, Debtors Reagor-Dykes II, LLC, Reagor-Dykes III, LLC, Reagor Auto Mall , Ltd.(“RAM”), Reagor Auto Mall I, LLC, and Reagor-Dykes Snyder, L.P. (“Snyder”) (collectively, the “New Debtors”) filed voluntary petitions under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the Bankruptcy Court. Both the Original Debtors’ Chapter 11 cases and the New Debtors Chapter 11 cases are jointly administered under case number 18-50214 (collectively, the “Chapter 11 Cases”).

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 9 of 68

Page 10: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 54842-6525-0690.16

The Debtors continue to operate and manage their estates (the “Estates”) as debtors and debtors-in-possession pursuant to §§ 1107 and 1108 of the Bankruptcy Code. As of the date of the filing of this Disclosure Statement, no Official Committee(s) of Unsecured Creditors have been appointed by the Office of the United States Trustee in the Debtors’ cases.

The purpose of this Disclosure Statement is to enable those persons whose Claims against and whose Interests in the Debtors are Impaired and entitled to vote under the Plan to make an informed decision on whether to vote for or against the Plan. Holders of Claims should read this Disclosure Statement and the Plan in their entirety before voting on the Plan. The Disclosure Statement contains a brief history of the Debtors, a summary of the Chapter 11 Cases, summary of material provisions of the Plan – including provisions relating to the Plan’s treatment of Claims against and Interests in the Debtors – a discussion of Plan feasibility, administration of the Estates and Assets, the means of implementation of the Plan, and a liquidation analysis setting forth what Holders of a Claim against or Interest in the Debtors would recover if the Debtors were liquidated on the projected effective date under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code. The Disclosure Statement also summarizes certain financial information concerning the Debtors and the Claims asserted against the Debtors in the Chapter 11 Cases.

Section 1.1 Voting Procedure.

No solicitation of votes with respect to the Plan may be made except pursuant to this Disclosure Statement. No statement or information concerning the Debtors (particularly as to the results or financial condition of, or with respect to distributions to be made under the Plan) or any of the Debtors’ assets, properties or business that is given for the purpose of soliciting acceptances or rejections of the Plan, is authorized other than as set forth in this Disclosure Statement. EXCEPT FOR THE INFORMATION SET FORTH IN THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT AND THE EXHIBITS ATTACHED, NO REPRESENTATIONS CONCERNING THE DEBTORS, THE DEBTORS’ ASSETS AND LIABILTIES, THE PAST OR FUTURE OPERATIONS OF THE DEBTORS, THE PLAN AND ITS TERMS OR ALTERNATIVES TO THE PLAN ARE AUTHORIZED, NOR ARE ANY SUCH REPRESENTATIONS TO BE RELIED ON IN ARRIVING AT A DECISION WITH RESPECT TO THE PLAN. ANY INFORMATION REGARDING SUCH TOPIC AREAS THAT IS PROVIDED TO SECURE ACCEPTANCE OR REJECTION OF THE PLAN AND THAT IS NOT CONTAINED IN THIS DISLOSURE STATEMENT AND THE EXHIBITS ATTACHED IS UNAUTHORIZED AND SHOULD BE REPORTED IMMEDIATELY TO THE DEBTORS’ COUNSEL.

While the Debtors believe that the Disclosure Statement contains adequate information about the documents and information summarized, Holders of Claims and Holders of Interests should review the entire Plan and each document referenced therein and herein, and should seek the advice of their own counsel and other advisors before voting on the Plan. In the event of any inconsistencies between the provisions of the Plan and this Disclosure Statement, the provisions of the Plan shall control. A copy of the Plan is attached as Exhibit “A” to this Disclosure Statement. Certain provisions of the Plan—and, therefore descriptions and summaries contained in this Disclosure Statement—may be the subject of continuing negotiations among the Debtors and various parties, may not have been finally agreed, and may be modified. However, such modifications will not have a material effect on the distributions contemplated by the Plan.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 10 of 68

Page 11: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 64842-6525-0690.16

After carefully reviewing this Disclosure Statement and all exhibits and schedules attached hereto, please indicate your acceptance or rejection of the Plan by voting in favor of or against the Plan on the enclosed Ballot. The Debtors strongly urge each recipient entitled to vote on the Plan to review carefully the contents of this Disclosure Statement, the Plan, and the other documents that accompany or are referenced in this Disclosure Statement in their entirety before making a decision to accept or reject the Plan.

IT IS OF THE UTMOST IMPORTANCE TO THE DEBTORS THAT YOU VOTE PROMPTLY TO ACCEPT THE PLAN BY COMPLETING AND SIGNING THE BALLOT ENCLOSED HEREWITH AND RETURNING THE BALLOTS PROMPTLY SO THAT THEY ARE STAMPED AS HAVING BEEN RECEIVED BY NO LATER THAN 5:00 P.M., CENTRAL STANDARD TIME, ON ________________, 2019 (THE “VOTING DEADLINE”) AT THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS, AS SET FORTH ON THE ENCLOSED RETURN ENVELOPE:

REAGOR DYKES BALLOTS ATTN: MARCUS A. HELT AND ASHLEY ELLIS

C/O FOLEY GARDERE, FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 2021 MCKINNEY AVENUE, SUITE 1600

DALLAS, TX 75201

THE DEBTORS BELIEVE THAT ACCEPTANCE OF THE PLAN IS IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF ALL CLAIMANTS OF THE DEBTORS; CONSEQUENTLY, THE DEBTORS URGE ALL CLAIMANTS TO VOTE TO ACCEPT THE PLAN.

Ballots that are received after the Voting Deadline may not be used in connection with the Debtors’ request for confirmation of the Plan or any modification thereof, except to the extent allowed by the Bankruptcy Court.

This Disclosure Statement has been compiled by the Debtors to accompany the Plan. The factual statements, projections, financial information, and other information contained in this Disclosure Statement have been taken primarily from documents prepared by the Debtors, including the Debtors’ Schedules and Statement of Financial Affairs, the Debtors’ Monthly Operating Reports, and pleadings filed in the Bankruptcy Case. Nothing contained in this Disclosure Statement shall have any preclusive effect against the Debtors (whether by waiver, admission, estoppel, or otherwise) in any cause or proceeding which may exist or occur in the future. This Disclosure Statement shall not be construed or deemed to constitute an acceptance of fact or an admission by the Debtors with regard to any of the statements made herein, and all rights and remedies of the Debtors are expressly reserved in this regard. This Disclosure Statement contains statements which constitute the Debtors’ or other third parties’ views of certain facts. All such disclosures should be read as assertions of such parties. To the extent any paragraph does not contain an express reference that it constitutes an assertion of a particular party, it should be read as an assertion of the party indicated by the context and meaning of such paragraph.

THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT ARE MADE EITHER AS OF THE PETITION DATE OR THE DATE HEREOF UNLESS ANOTHER TIME IS SPECIFIED HEREIN, AND NEITHER DELIVERY OF THIS DISCLOSURE

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 11 of 68

Page 12: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 74842-6525-0690.16

STATEMENT NOR ANY EXERCISE OF RIGHTS GRANTED IN CONNECTION WITH THE PLAN SHALL, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, CREATE AN IMPLICATION THAT THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN THE INFORMATION SET FORTH HEREIN SINCE THE DATE OF THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT.

CERTAIN OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT, BY ITS NATURE, IS FORWARD LOOKING, CONTAINS ESTIMATES AND ASSUMPTIONS WHICH MAY PROVE TO BE INACCURATE, AND CONTAINS PROJECTIONS WHICH MAY PROVE TO BE WRONG, OR WHICH MAY BE MATERIALLY DIFFERENT FROM ACTUAL FUTURE RESULTS. EACH CLAIMANT SHOULD INDEPENDENTLY VERIFY AND CONSULT ITS INDIVIDUAL ATTORNEY AND ACCOUNTANT AS TO THE EFFECT OF THE PLAN ON SUCH INDIVIDUAL CLAIMANT OR INTEREST HOLDER.

Pursuant to the Disclosure Statement Order (“Exhibit D”), the hearing on the Confirmation of the Plan is set for [ ]a/p.m., Central Standard Time, in the Courtroom of the Honorable Robert L. Jones, United States Bankruptcy Judge, United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas, Lubbock Division, 1205 Texas Ave., Room 306, Lubbock, Texas 79401. Objections to the Confirmation of the Plan must be filed with the Bankruptcy Court and received by counsel for the Debtors on or before [___________________________], 2019. Counsel for the Debtors will request Confirmation of the Plan at the Confirmation Hearing.

Counsel for the Debtors strongly urges each recipient entitled to vote on the Plan to review carefully the contents of this Disclosure Statement, the Plan, and the other documents that accompany or are referenced in this Disclosure Statement in their entirety before making a decision to accept or reject the Plan.

Section 1.2 Explanation of Chapter 11.

Chapter 11 is the principal reorganization chapter of the Bankruptcy Code. Under Chapter 11, a person or entity attempts to reorganize its business and financial affairs for the benefit of its creditors, shareholders and other interested parties.

The commencement of a Chapter 11 case creates an estate comprising all of a debtor’s legal and equitable interests in property as of the date the petition is filed. Unless the bankruptcy court orders the appointment of a Chapter 11 trustee, Bankruptcy Code sections 1101, 1107 and 1108 provide that a chapter 11 debtor may continue to operate its business and control the assets of its estate as a “debtor-in-possession” as the Debtors have done in these Chapter 11 Cases since the Petition Date.

The filing of a Chapter 11 petition also triggers the automatic stay under section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code. The automatic stay is an injunction that halts essentially all attempts to collect pre-petition claims from the Debtors or to otherwise interfere with a Debtors’ business or their estates.

Formulation of a plan of reorganization is the principal purpose of a Chapter 11 bankruptcy case. The plan sets forth the means for satisfying the claims of creditors against, and interests of equity security holders in, the Debtors. Unless a trustee is appointed, only the Debtors may file a plan during the first 120 days of a Chapter 11 case (the “Exclusive Period”). Only after the Exclusive Period has expired or is terminated by the Bankruptcy Court, a creditor or any other interested party may file a plan, unless the Debtors file a plan within the Exclusive Period or receives an extension of such period by

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 12 of 68

Page 13: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 84842-6525-0690.16

order of the Bankruptcy Court. If the Debtors file a plan within the Exclusive Period, the Debtors are given sixty (60) additional days (the “Solicitation Period”) to solicit acceptances of its plan. Bankruptcy Code section 1121(d) permits the Bankruptcy Court to extend or reduce the Exclusive Period and the Solicitation Period upon a showing of adequate “cause.”

After the plan has been filed, the holders of impaired claims against, or interests in, a debtor are permitted to vote on whether to accept or reject the plan. Chapter 11 does not require that each holder of a claim against, or interest in, a debtor vote in favor of a plan in order for the plan to be confirmed. At a minimum, however, a plan must be accepted by a majority in number (i.e., more than 50%) and at least two-thirds (2/3) in amount of those claims actually voting, from at least one class of impaired claims under the plan, to the extent that there are any impaired classes. The Bankruptcy Code also defines acceptance of a plan by a class of interests (equity securities) as acceptance by holders of at least two-thirds of the number of interests that actually voted.

Classes of claims or interests that are not “impaired” under a plan of reorganization are conclusively presumed to have accepted the plan, and therefore are not entitled to vote. A class is “impaired” if the plan modifies the legal, equitable, or contractual rights attaching to the claims or interests of that class. Modification for purposes of impairment does not include curing defaults and reinstating maturity or payment in full in cash. Conversely, classes of claims or interests that receive or retain no property under a plan of reorganization are conclusively presumed to have rejected the plan, and therefore are not entitled to vote.

Even if all classes of claims and interests accept a plan of reorganization, a bankruptcy court may nonetheless still deny confirmation. Bankruptcy Code section 1129 sets forth the requirements for confirmation and, among other things, requires that a plan be in the “best interests” of impaired and dissenting creditors and interest holders and that the plan be feasible. The “best interests” test generally requires that the value of the consideration to be distributed to impaired and dissenting creditors and interest holders under a plan may not be less than those parties would receive if the debtor were liquidated under a hypothetical liquidation occurring under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code. A plan must also be determined to be “feasible,” which generally requires a finding that there is a reasonable probability that the debtor will be able to perform the obligations incurred under the plan and that the debtor will be able to continue operations without the need for further financial reorganization.

A bankruptcy court may confirm a plan of reorganization even though fewer than all of the classes of impaired claims and interests vote to accept such plan. A bankruptcy court may do so under the “cramdown” provisions of section 1129(b) of the Bankruptcy Code. In order for a plan to be confirmed under the “cramdown” provisions, despite the rejection of a class of impaired claims or interests, the plan proponent must show, among other things, that the plan does not discriminate unfairly and that it is “fair and equitable” with respect to impaired classes of claims or interests that have not accepted the plan.

A bankruptcy court must further find that the economic terms of the plan meet the specific requirements of Bankruptcy Code section 1129(b) with respect to the subject objecting class(es). If the plan proponent proposes to seek confirmation of the plan under the provisions of Bankruptcy Code section 1129(b), the plan proponent must also meet all applicable requirements of Bankruptcy Code section 1129(a) (except section 1129(a)(8)). Those requirements include, among other things,

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 13 of 68

Page 14: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 94842-6525-0690.16

that (i) the plan complies with applicable Bankruptcy Code provisions and other applicable law, and that (ii) the plan be proposed in good faith.

Section 1.3 Rules of Interpretation.

The following rules for interpretation and construction shall apply to the Disclosure Statement:

a) all terms defined in the Plan shall carry the same definitions in the Disclosure Statement unless otherwise defined herein;

b) whenever from the context it is appropriate, each term, whether stated in the singular or the plural, shall include both the singular and the plural, and pronouns stated in the masculine, feminine, or neuter gender shall include the masculine, feminine, and the neuter gender;

c) unless otherwise specified, any reference in the Disclosure Statement to a contract, instrument, release, or other agreement or document being in a particular form or on particular terms and conditions means that such document shall be substantially in such form or substantially on such terms and conditions;

d) unless otherwise specified, any reference in the Disclosure Statement to an existing document, schedule, or exhibit, whether or not filed, shall mean such document, schedule, or exhibit, as it may have been or may be amended, modified, or supplemented;

e) any reference to a person or entity as a holder of a Claim or Interest includes that person or entity’s successors and assigns;

f) unless otherwise specified, all references in the Disclosure Statement to Articles are references to Articles of the Disclosure Statement;

g) unless otherwise specified, all references in the Disclosure Statement to exhibits are references to exhibits to the Disclosure Statement;

h) the words “herein,” “hereof,” and “hereto” refer to the Disclosure Statement in its entirety rather than to a particular portion of the Disclosure Statement;

i) captions and headings to Articles are inserted for convenience of reference only and are not intended to be a part of or to affect the interpretation of the Disclosure Statement;

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 14 of 68

Page 15: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 104842-6525-0690.16

j) unless otherwise set forth in the Disclosure Statement, the rules of construction set forth in section 102 of the Bankruptcy Code shall apply;

k) any term used in capitalized form in the Disclosure Statement that is not otherwise defined in the Disclosure Statement, Plan, or exhibits to the Disclosure Statement Order, but that is used in the Bankruptcy Code or the Bankruptcy Rules shall have the meaning assigned to such term in the Bankruptcy Code or the Bankruptcy Rules, as applicable;

l) all references to docket numbers of documents filed in the Chapter 11 Cases are references to the docket numbers under the Bankruptcy Court’s CM/ECF system;

m) all references to statutes, regulations, orders, rules of courts, and the like shall mean as amended from time to time, unless otherwise stated;

n) in computing any period of time prescribed or allowed, the provisions of Bankruptcy Rule 9006(a) shall apply, and if the date on which a transaction may occur pursuant to the Disclosure Statement shall occur on a day that is not a Business Day, then such transaction shall instead occur on the next succeeding Business Day; and,

o) unless otherwise specified, all references in the Disclosure Statement to monetary figures shall refer to currency of the United States of America.

Section 1.4 Recommendation of the Debtors to Approve the Plan.

The Debtors approved the solicitation of acceptances of the Plan and all of the transactions contemplated thereunder. In light of the benefits to be attained by the holders of Claims and Interests contemplated under the Plan, the Debtors recommend that such holders of Claims and Interests vote to accept the Plan. The Debtors reached this decision after considering the alternatives to the Plan that are available to the Debtors. These alternatives include liquidation under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code or some alternative plan. The Debtors determined, after consulting with their advisors, that the transactions contemplated in the Plan would likely result in a distribution of greater value to creditors and stockholders than the alternatives.

THE DEBTORS BELIEVE THAT THE PLAN AND THE TREATMENT OF CLAIMS AND INTERESTS THEREUNDER IS IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF HOLDERS OF CLAIMS AND INTERESTS.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 15 of 68

Page 16: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 114842-6525-0690.16

ARTICLE II SUMMARY

This Disclosure Statement sets forth certain information regarding the Debtors’ prepetition operating and financial history, the need to seek Chapter 11 protection, significant events that have occurred during the Chapter 11 Cases. This Disclosure Statement also describes terms and provisions of the Plan, including certain alternatives to the Plan, certain effects of confirmation of the Plan, certain risk factors associated with the Plan, and the manner in which distributions will be made under the Plan. In addition, this Disclosure Statement discusses the confirmation process and the voting procedures that Creditors in voting classes must follow for their votes to be counted. Certain provisions of the Plan, and thus the descriptions and summaries contained in this Disclosure Statement, may be the subject of continuing negotiations among the Debtors and various parties, may not have been finally agreed upon, and may be modified.

The Debtors are the proponents of the Plan within the meaning of Section 1129 of the Bankruptcy Code. The Plan contains separate Classes and proposes recoveries for holders of Claims against and Interests in the Debtors. After careful review of the Debtors’ current business operations and estimated recoveries in a liquidation scenario under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code, the Debtors have concluded that the recovery to Creditors will be maximized by the reorganization or controlled liquidation of the Debtors as contemplated by the Plan. For your convenience, the following is a summary of certain material terms of the Plan. The Debtors encourage you to read the Plan in its entirety. The Plan is a comprehensive proposal by the Debtors that provides for the following:

Section 2.1 Alternative Paths to the Effective Date

This Plan provides two (2) alternative paths to a successful exit from Chapter 11 for the Debtors: (a) the Restructuring Alternative, or (b) if the Plan does not go effective under the Restructuring Alternative within seventy-five (75) days of Confirmation,2 a controlled liquidation of assets via the Liquidation Alternative. The Debtors believe that a Restructuring would yield the highest and best return for all creditors and parties in interest but, if the Debtors determine at any time – pre-Confirmation or post-Confirmation – that despite their best efforts the Plan cannot go effective under the Restructuring Alternative, the Liquidation Alternative shall take effect. The most likely circumstance that would cause the Plan to proceed under the Liquidation Alternative is if the Debtors are unable to reach an agreement for a New Equity Infusion with a Plan Sponsor within the timeframe to which the United States Trustee has agreed and that timeframe is not extended by agreement or further order of the Court.

2 Under the Plan, the Restructuring Alternative must go effective within seventy-five (75) days of the Confirmation Date unless otherwise agreed by the United States Trustee or approved by the Court. Any request to extend this seventy-five (75) day deadline must be filed prior to the expiration of same. The timely filing of such a motion shall toll the expiration of the deadline until further ruling by the Court.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 16 of 68

Page 17: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 124842-6525-0690.16

GM Financial raised the concern that inclusion of the Restructuring Alternative in the Plan is somehow confusing or not in the best interest of creditors. The Debtors disagree and would state in response that there can be no bona fide dispute that the Restructuring Alternative will generate more value for all creditors, especially Ford, Ford Credit, GM, and GM Financial. If the Restructuring Alternative is not attainable, the Plan contemplates a controlled Liquidation Alternative overseen by a Creditors Trustee with historical knowledge and experience with these Debtors (Lyndon James, a principal of the Debtors’ CRO), which the Debtors believe is a better option than a liquidation under chapter 7.

Section 2.2 Plan and Treatment of Claims – Restructuring Alternative. Under the Restructuring Alternative, the Plan will effectuate a reorganization of the Dealerships, the business, and the operations. Pursuant to the terms of the Plan and a Restructuring:

a) The Dealerships will be recapitalized by the Plan Sponsor or its designee. The Reorganized Debtors will retain their operating assets3 together with Causes of Action not resolved by this Plan, and will continue to operate their business under a name selected by the Plan Sponsor.

b) The franchise agreements with Ford Motor, General Motors, Mitsubishi, and Toyota will be assumed in the Plan.

c) Post-confirmation, the Reorganized Debtors will benefit from the proven operational expertise of Fin Ewing and his consulting group (collectively, the “Fin Ewing Group”). The Fin Ewing Group will provide consulting services to the Reorganized Debtors. These consulting services will help the Reorganized Debtors accomplish their long-term business and financial goals as outlined in the Plan.

d) Directors and officers of the Reorganized Debtors will be identified in the Plan Supplement Documents.4

3 To clarify the scope of this reference to “operating assets,” under the Restructuring Alternative, the Debtors will retain all assets listed on the current balance sheet attached to this Disclosure Statement as Exhibit H. To the extent that a secured creditor has obtained relief from the stay and repossessed its collateral, such collateral has been excluded from the Plan and Post-Confirmation Business Plan and the cost of obtaining replacement collateral as/if needed is likewise accounted for in the reorganization projections. The lift-stay orders from the Court each contain a reporting requirement so that secured creditors are required to account for the value of liquidated collateral; the treatment of unsecured deficiency claims is set forth in the Plan.

4 The Debtors believe that the timing for filing the Plan Supplement Documents is sufficient and adequate disclosure of the information contained therein, given the circumstances of this case. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, the

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 17 of 68

Page 18: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 134842-6525-0690.16

e) The Reorganized Debtors are expected to receive up to $13 mm in cash (the “New Equity Infusion”) from the Plan Sponsor. The New Equity Infusion may be a combination of (i) debtor-in-possession financing approved by the Bankruptcy Court and received by the Debtors before the Confirmation in a yet-to-be-determined amount and (ii) equity financing received by the Debtors after the Confirmation.5

f) The New Equity Infusion will be used as follows: (i) approximately $4.3 million as initial post-confirmation working capital on an as-needed basis; (ii) pay all allowed, administrative expenses of the Estates, which such expenses are estimated to be approximately $5 million; (iii) approximately $.700 million to Qualified Retail Lenders in Class 9; (v) up to approximately $2 million to Ford Credit if certain conditions are satisfied; and (v) up to approximately $1.5 million to GM Financial if certain conditions are satisfied, including if GM Financial provides floorplan financing to the Reorganized Debtors.6

g) The equity of the Reorganized Debtors will be owned (i) 90% by the Plan Sponsor or its designee and (ii) 10% by a Creditors Trust for the express benefit of creditors holding Allowed Class 11 General Unsecured Claims.7

h) Each Allowed Class 11 Claim will receive a beneficial interest in the Creditors Trust. In addition to the 10% equity interest in the Reorganized Debtors, the Creditors Trust Assets will include $1 million in cash contributed by Rick Dykes.

i) Each beneficial interest and the 10% equity will be subject to a redemption right that will allow the Reorganized Debtors to redeem this equity upon payment in full of the Allowed amount of Unsecured Claims converted to equity or such amount agreed by the holders of such Unsecured Claims and the Reorganized Debtors. After distributions to holders of Allowed Class 11

Debtors will file the appropriate Notice of the Plan Supplement Documents, as set forth in the Plan, not less than 10 days prior to the voting deadline.

5 For clarity, “equity financing” as used in the term New Equity Infusion is the process of raising capital through the sale of shares of stock.

6 The Plan contemplates up to $13 mm in equity financing, because $13 mm may not be necessary. If less than $13 mm is received and the Debtors still believe that the Restructuring Alternative is nonetheless feasible, then the Debtors will present that evidence to the Court at confirmation as evidence of feasibility. If not, the Debtors will proceed to Confirmation of the Plan via the Liquidation Alternative.

7 The projections in the Post-Confirmation Business Plan show what the Debtors project the reorganized entity to generate on an EBITDA basis, which is an integral component to an overall enterprise-value calculation. How much of that value is paid to the equity stakeholders through dividends will be determined by the Reorganized Debtors’ board, which is common in similar situations.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 18 of 68

Page 19: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 144842-6525-0690.16

Unsecured Claims reach a total of $7.5 million, the Creditors’ Trust will surrender this 10% equity interest to the Reorganized Debtors.

j) The Creditors Trust will make distributions to all Allowed Unsecured Claims in Class 11 pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Plan and a Creditors Trust Agreement.

k) The Reorganized Debtors will assume certain unsecured Assumed Trade Claims under this Plan. The identity of such assumed unsecured Assumed Trade Claims will be disclosed in the Plan Supplement. Such Assumed Trade Claims will be treated in Class 10 and will not participate in Class 11.

l) Ford Credit’s secured claim will be paid in full by surrender of Collateral.

m) Ford Credit’s unsecured claim will be paid from Excess Cash Flow and only after payment of all Allowed Administrative Expenses by (i) a $1 million cash payment in 2020, (ii) a $1 million cash payment in 2021 and (iii) a $5 million unsecured promissory note.8

n) The $5 million unsecured promissory note payable to Ford Credit will have the following terms: (i) 10-year amortization, (ii) 7-year balloon payment, (iii) 6.5% interest per annum, (iv) payment-in-kind interest for 12 months, and (v) payable thereafter from Excess Cash Flow.

o) Payment of the $2.0 million to Ford Credit is subject to and conditioned on (i) the assumption of the Debtors’ franchise agreements with Ford Motor or issuance of a new franchise agreement(s), and (iii) implementation of the Restructuring Alternative under the Plan.

p) GM Financial’s secured claim will be paid in full by surrender of Collateral.

q) GM Financial’s unsecured claim will be paid as follows: As a settlement and full and final satisfaction and release of all unsecured claims, GM Financial will receive (i) $750,000 from Excess Cash Flow by the later of (x) 180 days after the Effective

8 The Debtors will explain at the Confirmation Hearing why Ford Credit and GM Financial deserve the treatment provided in the Plan. That said, among other reasons, the Debtors identify the following two reasons. First, Ford Credit provided 10 to 20 times more floor-plan credit to the Debtors prior to bankruptcy than GM Financial provided to the Debtors during that same period. Second, the Reorganized Debtors contemplate a restructuring around two Ford dealerships and one General Motors dealership. As with GM Financial, any payment to Ford Credit is subject to and conditioned on meeting a number of criteria identified in the Plan. Meeting these criteria will aid in the restructuring, which will benefit all unsecured creditors.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 19 of 68

Page 20: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 154842-6525-0690.16

Date and (y) payment of all Allowed Administrative Expenses, and (ii) another $750,000 from Excess Cash Flow no later than twelve (12) months after the first payment of $750,000 to GM Financial.

r) Payment of the $1.5 million is subject to and conditioned on (i) GM Financial providing floorplan financing to the Reorganized Debtors on mutually agreed terms, (ii) the assumption of the Debtors’ franchise agreement with General Motors or issuance of a new franchise agreement, and (iii) implementation of the Restructuring Alternative under the Plan.

s) First Capital Bank’s secured claim will be paid as follows: In full and final satisfaction of all First Capital’s secured claims against the Debtors, First Capital Bank will receive (a) the net proceeds from the liquidation of collateral after payment of (i) all fees incurred and (ii) expenses reimbursed related to the liquidation of such collateral, or (b) surrender of collateral.

t) First Capital Bank’s unsecured claim is a Disputed Claim. To the extent Allowed, First Capital Bank’s unsecured claim will be treated in Class 11 and paid as follows: In full and final satisfaction and release of all First Capital’s unsecured claims against the Debtors, First Capital Bank will receive its Pro Rata Share of Creditors Trust Assets, which includes 10% equity securities of the Reorganized Debtors. All Causes of Action against First Capital Bank are reserved under this Plan.

u) FB&T’s secured claim will be paid as follows: In full and final satisfaction of all secured claims against the Debtors, FB&T will receive (a) the net proceeds from the liquidation of collateral after payment of (i) all fees incurred and (ii) expenses reimbursed related to the liquidation of such collateral, or (b) surrender of collateral.

v) FB&T’s unsecured claim is a Disputed Claim. To the extent Allowed, FB&T’s unsecured claim will be treated in Class 11 and paid as follows: In full and final satisfaction and release of all FB&T’s unsecured claims against the Debtors, FB&T will receive its Pro Rata Share of Creditors Trust Assets, which includes 10% equity securities of the Reorganized Debtors. All Causes of Action against FB&T are reserved under this Plan.

w) Pursuant to the Plan, the Dealerships or Locations will be operated on the same real estate where the Dealerships or Locations were operated prior to and during the bankruptcy case. That real estate is now owned by IBC Bank. IBC Bank has given Rick Dykes and his assigns both an option right and a right of first refusal to purchase the real estate at mutually-agreed and confidential “strike

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 20 of 68

Page 21: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 164842-6525-0690.16

prices.” To facilitate the proposed Restructuring, Rick Dykes has agreed to assign his option and right of first refusal to the Reorganized Debtors to implement the Restructuring Alternative.

x) Each Qualified Retail Lender who (i) executes a TT&L Agreement, (ii) provides the Reorganized Debtors with proof of payment of a TT&L/Trade Liability, and (iii) agrees to provide future retail lending to the Reorganized Debtors on terms mutually acceptable to the Reorganized Debtors and said Retail Lender, thereby becoming a Qualified Retail Lender, will be reimbursed their Pro Rata Share for payment of the Debtors’ TT&L/Trade Liability either (x) within sixty (60) days after the Effective Date if funds are immediately available or (y) via receipt of an unsecured promissory note payable by the Reorganized Debtors at 3% interest per annum with a two-year term.9 Such reimbursement will be made from the Qualified Retail Lender Pool. This Qualified Retail Lender Pool will be up to $.700 million.

y) Allowed Administrative Claims will be paid at or before the Effective Date, or on such terms as the Reorganized Debtors and the holder of an Allowed Administrative Claim may otherwise agree.

Section 2.3 Plan and Treatment of Claims – Liquidation Alternative. Under the Liquidation Alternative, the Plan will effect an orderly wind down of the Debtors’ business operations, a controlled liquidation of all Collateral, and the transfer of all Causes of Action to the Creditors Trust. Pursuant to the terms of the Plan and the Liquidation Alternative:

a) A Creditors Trust will be established and the Creditors Trustee will be appointed upon Confirmation.

b) All Assets, including Causes of Action, and all rights to challenge the extent, priority and validity of alleged liens, and all Collateral not surrendered under the terms of this Plan will be transferred to the Creditors Trust and the Creditors Trustee.

c) All Holders of Allowed Administrative Claims will be paid from liquidation proceeds in their relative priorities, all Holders of Allowed Unsecured Claims will receive a beneficial interest in the Creditors Trust equal to the pro rata amount of their Allowed Unsecured Claim, and the Creditors Trustee will make distributions to all Allowed Unsecured Claims in Class 11 pursuant

9 The current intention of the Debtors is pay the Qualified Retail Lenders cash if the conditions stated in the Plan are satisfied. It is possible that the Qualified Retail Lenders will receive a note instead of cash. The decision on whether to pay cash or a note to the Qualified Retail Lenders will be based on the Reorganized Debtors’ exercise of business judgment.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 21 of 68

Page 22: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 174842-6525-0690.16

to the terms and conditions of this Plan and a Creditors Trust Agreement.

d) Ford Credit’s Allowed Secured Claim will be paid in full by surrender of Collateral.

e) Ford Credit’s Unsecured Claim is a Disputed Claim. To the extent Allowed, Ford Credit’s Unsecured Claim will be treated in Class 12 and paid as follows: In full and final satisfaction and release of all Ford Credit’s Unsecured Claims against the Debtors, Ford Credit will receive its Pro Rata Share of the Creditors Trust Assets. All Causes of Action against Ford Credit are reserved under the Liquidation Alternative in this Plan.

f) GM Financial’s Allowed Secured Claim will be paid in full by surrender of Collateral.

g) GM Financial’s Unsecured Claim is a Disputed Claim. To the extent Allowed, GM Financial’s Unsecured Claim will be treated in Class 13 and paid as follows: In full and final satisfaction and release of all GM Financial’s Unsecured Claims against the Debtors, GM Financial will receive its Pro Rata Share of the Creditors Trust Assets. All Causes of Action against GM Financial are reserved under the Liquidation Alternative in this Plan.

h) FB&T’s secured claim is a Disputed Claim. To the extent Allowed, FB&T’s Secured Claim will be paid as follows: In full and final satisfaction of all secured claims against the Debtors, FB&T will receive (i) the net proceeds from the liquidation of collateral after payment of (x) all fees incurred and (y) expenses reimbursed related to the liquidation of such collateral, or (ii) surrender of collateral.

i) FB&T’s unsecured claim is a Disputed Claim. To the extent Allowed, FB&T’s unsecured claim will be treated in Class 11 and paid as follows: In full and final satisfaction and release of all FB&T’s unsecured claims against the Debtors, FB&T will receive its Pro Rata Share of the Creditors Trust Assets. All Causes of Action against FB&T are reserved under this Plan.

j) The Creditors Trust shall make distributions to Holders of Allowed Class 11 Unsecured Claims of their Pro Rata Share (calculated together with Allowed Claims in Classes 12, 13, 14 and 15) of the Creditors Trust Assets.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 22 of 68

Page 23: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 184842-6525-0690.16

Regardless of the alternative under which the Plan proceeds to an Effective Date, all Causes of Action are hereby preserved.10 Also upon the Effective Date, as more fully detailed in the Plan, the Released Parties (defined in the Plan as the Debtors, Professionals of the Estates, and the Plan Sponsor (inclusive of Rick Dykes) are released and discharged by the Releasing Parties11 from any and all claims and Causes of Action related to, among other things as set forth in detail in the Plan, the Debtors, the Chapter 11 Cases, and the Plan.

With regard to executory contracts and unexpired leases, if the Restructuring takes place, the Plan operates as a motion under § 365 to assume all agreements, including sales and service agreements, under which the Debtors operate automotive/vehicle franchise agreements at the Dealerships, including such agreements with Mitsubishi, Toyota, General Motors, and Ford Motor Company. For all other Executory Contracts or Unexpired Leases, and for the foregoing automotive/vehicle franchise agreements in the event of the Liquidation Alternative, every Executory Contract and Unexpired Lease shall be deemed rejected unless it is identified on the Schedule of Assumed Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases. Specifically with regard to the real property lease with Patti Sue Noel as lessor, under the Restructuring Alternative such lease will be assumed pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth in the prior order of the Bankruptcy Court governing such assumption.

Creditors holding Allowed Claims shall receive the following treatment under the Plan:

CLASS

CLAIMANT TREATMENT: RESTRUCTURING

ALTERNATIVE

TREATMENT: LIQUIDATION ALTERNATIVE

1. ALLOWED PRIORITY NON-TAX CLAIMS

Shall receive (i) Cash in an amount equal to the Allowed amount of such Priority Non-Tax Claim on the Effective Date or (ii) other treatment consistent with the provisions of § 1129(a)(9) of the Bankruptcy Code; provided, however, that Priority Non-Tax Claims that arise in the ordinary course of the Debtors’ business shall be paid by the Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors, as applicable, in the ordinary course of business.

Shall receive (i) Cash in an amount equal to the Allowed amount of such Priority Non-Tax Claim on the Effective Date or (ii) other treatment consistent with the provisions of § 1129(a)(9) of the Bankruptcy Code.

1A. ALLOWED 9019 LUBBOCK COUNTY CLAIM

Shall receive Cash as soon reasonably practicable when funds are available after the Effective

Shall receive Cash as soon reasonably practicable when funds are available after the Effective

10 Ford Credit asserts a "replacement" lien in certain assets, including non-Chapter 5 claims and causes of action. It is unclear whether Ford Credit in fact asserts a lien on tort claims held by the Debtors. The Debtors dispute any suggestion that (a) this replacement lien (x) covers Chapter 5 Causes of Action, commercial tort claims, or collateral different than collateral held by Ford Credit prior to the bankruptcy, and (y) is not limited to diminution in value and (b) that Ford Credit has an Allowed Claim to support any asserted lien.

11 Please see footnote 9 for a discussion of Releasing Parties.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 23 of 68

Page 24: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 194842-6525-0690.16

CLASS

CLAIMANT TREATMENT: RESTRUCTURING

ALTERNATIVE

TREATMENT: LIQUIDATION ALTERNATIVE

Date consistent with the 9019 Order. Any amounts due to Lubbock County Tax Assessor will be paid before payment to General Unsecured Creditors.

Date consistent with the 9019 Order.

2. SECURED CLAIM OF FORD CREDIT COMPANY, LLC

Ford Credit’s Class 2 Claim will be paid by surrender of the Collateral.

The amount, validity, extent, value, and priority of the Allowed Secured Class 2 Claim under § 506 of the Bankruptcy Code will be determined by the Bankruptcy Court after the Effective Date or pursuant to an agreement between the Reorganized Debtors and the Holder of the Class 2 Claim. Any Deficiency Claim or other Unsecured Claim of the Holder of the Class 2 Claim shall be treated in Class 12.

Ford Credit’s Class 2 Claim will be paid by surrender of the Collateral.

The amount, validity, extent, value, and priority of the Allowed Secured Class 2 Claim under § 506 of the Bankruptcy Code will be determined by the Bankruptcy Court after the Effective Date. Any Deficiency Claim or other Unsecured Claim of the Holder of the Class 2 Claim shall be treated in Class 12.

3. SECURED CLAIM OF GM FINANCIAL

GM Financial’s Class 3 Claim will be paid by surrender of the Collateral.

The amount, validity, extent, value, and priority of the Allowed Secured Class 3 Claim under § 506 of the Bankruptcy Code will be determined by the Bankruptcy Court after the Effective Date or pursuant to an agreement between the Reorganized Debtors and the Holder of the Class 3 Claim. Any Deficiency Claim or other Unsecured Claim of the Holder of the Class 3 Claim shall be treated in Class 13.

GM Financial’s Class 3 Claim will be paid by surrender of the Collateral.

The amount, validity, extent, value, and priority of the Allowed Secured Class 3 Claim under § 506 of the Bankruptcy Code will be determined by the Bankruptcy Court after the Effective Date. Any Deficiency Claim or other Unsecured Claim of the Holder of the Class 3 Claim shall be treated in Class 13.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 24 of 68

Page 25: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 204842-6525-0690.16

CLASS

CLAIMANT TREATMENT: RESTRUCTURING

ALTERNATIVE

TREATMENT: LIQUIDATION ALTERNATIVE

4. SECURED CLAIM OF FIRST CAPITAL BANK

The Class 4 Claim will be satisfied in full and final satisfaction, settlement, release, and discharge of such Class 4 Claim (a) pursuant to an agreement between the Reorganized Debtors and the Holder of Class 4 Claim or (b) if no agreement is reached, at the Reorganized Debtors’ sole and absolute option, (i) the net proceeds from the liquidation of collateral after payment of all fees incurred and expenses reimbursed related to the liquidation of such collateral, or (ii) surrender of collateral.

The amount, validity, extent, value, and priority of the Allowed Secured Class 4 Claim under § 506 of the Bankruptcy Code will be determined by the Bankruptcy Court after the Effective Date or pursuant to an agreement between the Reorganized Debtors and the Holder of the Class 4 Claim. Any Deficiency Claim or other Unsecured Claim of the Holder of the Class 4 Claim shall be treated in Class 11.

First Capital Bank’s Class 4 Claim will be satisfied in full by surrender of the Collateral.

The amount, validity, extent, value, and priority of the Allowed Secured Class 4 Claim under § 506 of the Bankruptcy Code will be determined by the Bankruptcy Court after the Effective Date. Any Deficiency Claim or other Unsecured Claim of the Holder of the Class 4 Claim shall be treated in Class 11.

5. CLAIM OF FIRST BANK & TRUST

The Class 5 Claim will be satisfied in full and final satisfaction, settlement, release, and discharge of such Class 5 Claim (a) pursuant to an agreement between the Reorganized Debtors and the Holder of Class 5 Claim or (b) if no agreement is reached, at the Reorganized Debtors’ sole and absolute option, (i) the net proceeds from the liquidation of collateral after payment of all fees incurred and expenses reimbursed related to the liquidation of such collateral, or (ii) surrender of collateral.

FB&T’s Class 5 Claim will be paid by surrender of the Collateral.

The amount, validity, extent, value, and priority of the Allowed Secured Class 5 Claim under § 506 of the Bankruptcy Code will be determined by the Bankruptcy Court after the Effective Date. Any Deficiency Claim or other Unsecured Claim of the Holder of the Class 5 Claim shall be treated in Class 11.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 25 of 68

Page 26: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 214842-6525-0690.16

CLASS

CLAIMANT TREATMENT: RESTRUCTURING

ALTERNATIVE

TREATMENT: LIQUIDATION ALTERNATIVE

The amount, validity, extent, value, and priority of the Allowed Secured Class 5 Claim under § 506 of the Bankruptcy Code will be determined by the Bankruptcy Court after the Effective Date or pursuant to an agreement between the Reorganized Debtors and the Holder of the Class 5 Claim. Any Deficiency Claim or other Unsecured Claim of the Holder of the Class 5 Claim shall be treated in Class 11.

6. SECURED CLAIM OF AIM BANK

The Class 6 Claim will be satisfied in full and final satisfaction, settlement, release, and discharge of such Class 6 Claim (a) pursuant to an agreement between the Reorganized Debtors and the Holder of Class 6 Claim or (b) if no agreement is reached, at the Reorganized Debtors’ sole and absolute option, (i) the net proceeds from the liquidation of collateral after payment of all fees incurred and expenses reimbursed related to the liquidation of such collateral, or (ii) surrender of collateral.

The amount, validity, extent, value, and priority of the Allowed Secured Class 6 Claim under § 506 of the Bankruptcy Code will be determined by the Bankruptcy Court after the Effective Date or pursuant to an agreement between the Reorganized Debtors and the Holder of the Class 6 Claim. Any Deficiency Claim or other Unsecured Claim of the Holder of the Class 6 Claim shall be treated in Class 11.

AIM Bank’s Class 6 Claim will be paid by surrender of the Collateral.

The amount, validity, extent, value, and priority of the Allowed Secured Class 6 Claim under § 506 of the Bankruptcy Code will be determined by the Bankruptcy Court after the Effective Date. Any Deficiency Claim or other Unsecured Claim of the Holder of the Class 6 Claim shall be treated in Class 11.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 26 of 68

Page 27: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 224842-6525-0690.16

CLASS

CLAIMANT TREATMENT: RESTRUCTURING

ALTERNATIVE

TREATMENT: LIQUIDATION ALTERNATIVE

7. SECURED CLAIM OF VISTA BANK

The Class 7 Claim will be satisfied in full and final satisfaction, settlement, release, and discharge of such Class 7 Claim (a) pursuant to an agreement between the Reorganized Debtors and the Holder of Class 7 Claim or (b) if no agreement is reached, at the Reorganized Debtors’ sole and absolute option, (i) the net proceeds from the liquidation of collateral after payment of all fees incurred and expenses reimbursed related to the liquidation of such collateral, or (ii) surrender of collateral.

The amount, validity, extent, value, and priority of the Allowed Secured Class 7 Claim under § 506 of the Bankruptcy Code will be determined by the Bankruptcy Court after the Effective Date or pursuant to an agreement between the Reorganized Debtors and the Holder of the Class 7 Claim. Any Deficiency Claim or other Unsecured Claim of the Holder of the Class 7 Claim shall be treated in Class 11.

Vista Bank’s Class 7 Claim will be paid by surrender of the Collateral.

The amount, validity, extent, value, and priority of the Allowed Secured Class 7 Claim under § 506 of the Bankruptcy Code will be determined by the Bankruptcy Court after the Effective Date. Any Deficiency Claim or other Unsecured Claim of the Holder of the Class 7 Claim shall be treated in Class 11.

8. OTHER SECURED CLAIMS

Holders of Allowed Class 8 Claims, if any, shall be designated as Class 8A, Class 8B et seq. and shall be satisfied at the Reorganized Debtors’ option by (i) payment of such Allowed Secured Claim in full in cash, including interest, if applicable, as required under § 506(b) of the Bankruptcy Code; (ii) delivery of the Collateral securing such Allowed Secured Claim; or (iii) issuance of a restructured note with a present value equal to the amount of the value of each Holder’s Collateral with interest payable at a rate of

Holders of Allowed Class 8 Claims, if any, shall be designated as Class 8A, Class 8B et seq. and will be paid by surrender of the Collateral.

The amount, validity, extent, value, and priority of the Allowed Secured Class 8 Claim under § 506 of the Bankruptcy Code will be determined by the Bankruptcy Court after the Effective Date. Any Deficiency Claim or other Unsecured Claim of the Holder of the Class 8 Claim shall be treated in Class 11.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 27 of 68

Page 28: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 234842-6525-0690.16

CLASS

CLAIMANT TREATMENT: RESTRUCTURING

ALTERNATIVE

TREATMENT: LIQUIDATION ALTERNATIVE

3% annually, and payable in full in ten (10) years.

The amount, validity, extent, value, and priority, of any asserted Class 8 Claim under § 506 of the Bankruptcy Code will be determined by the Bankruptcy Court after the Effective Date or pursuant to an agreement between the Reorganized Debtors and the Holder of the Class 8 Claim. Any Deficiency Claim or other Unsecured Claim of the Holder of the Class 8 Claim shall be treated in Class 11.

9. CLAIMS OF QUALIFIED RETAIL LENDERS FOR PAYMENT OF TT&L/TRADE LIABILITY

As full and final satisfaction, settlement, release, and discharge of such Class 9 Claim, each Qualified Retail Lender in Class 9 will receive its Pro Rata Share from the Qualified Retail Lender Pool for reimbursement for such Qualified Retail Lenders’ payment of a TT&L/Trade Liability.

N/A under Liquidation Alternative

10. ASSUMED TRADE CLAIMS

As full and final satisfaction, settlement, release, and discharge of such Class 10 Claim, against each member of the Plan Sponsor, the Debtors, and the Reorganized Debtors, each Holder of a Class 10 Claim will receive payment in full, over time, through the assumption of the indebtedness underlying the Allowed Class 10 Claim payable on terms to be agreed by each Holder of an Assumed Trade Claim and the Reorganized Debtors.

N/A under Liquidation Alternative

11. As full and final satisfaction, settlement, release, and discharge of each Class 11 Claim against the

As full and final satisfaction, settlement, release, and discharge of each Class 11 Claim against the

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 28 of 68

Page 29: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 244842-6525-0690.16

CLASS

CLAIMANT TREATMENT: RESTRUCTURING

ALTERNATIVE

TREATMENT: LIQUIDATION ALTERNATIVE

GENERAL UNSECURED CLAIMS12

Debtors, each member of the Plan Sponsor, and the Reorganized Debtors, each Holder of a Class 11 Claim shall be satisfied by Pro Rata Share of Distributions from Creditors Trust Assets.13

Debtors, each Holder of a Class 11 Claim shall be satisfied by Pro Rata Share (calculated together with Allowed Claims in Classes 12, 13, 14 and 15) of Distributions from the Creditors Trust Assets.

12. Ford Credit’s Unsecured Claim will be paid from Excess Cash Flow and only after payment of all Allowed Administrative Expenses by (i) a $1 million cash

Ford Credit’s Unsecured Claim is a Disputed Claim. To the extent Allowed, Ford Credit’s Unsecured Claim will be treated in Class 12 and paid as follows: In full and

12 General Unsecured Creditors are included within the definition of “Releasing Parties” as set forth in the Plan. Releasing Parties is defined, in relevant part, as Holders of Claims who vote to accept the Plan but do not “opt out” of the releases on the Ballot, Holders of Claims whose vote to accept or reject the Plan is solicited but who do not vote to either accept or reject this Plan; and Holders of Claims who vote to reject the Plan but do not “opt out” of the releases on the Ballot. The Office of the United States Trustee has expressed the opinion that (i) non-consensual third party releases violate 5th Circuit precedent set in Bank of N.Y. Trust Co. v. Off’l Unsecured Creditors’ Comm. (In re Pacific Lumber Co.), 584 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2009), (ii) Creditors who do not vote to accept or reject the Plan should not be deemed to be Releasing Parties, and (iii) the ability of a Creditor to “opt out” of the releases on the Ballot is insufficient to create a consensual release. The Office of the US Trustee has advised that it will object to the releases set forth in section 13.4 of the Plan unless the Debtors (i) eliminate non-voting Creditors from the definition of Releasing Parties and (ii) change the “opt out” feature to an affirmative “opt in” feature such that voting Creditors must affirmatively choose to be a Releasing Party. The dialogue between the Debtors and the Office of the United States Trustee continues and, if no consensual resolution is reached, the Court will rule on the scope of Releasing Parties and efficacy of the releases at Confirmation.

For much of the bankruptcy, the Debtors had no other source of financing to pay pre-confirmation ordinary and necessary operating expenses of the estates, including expenses incurred to resolve consumer tax, title and license claims on inventory sales that were pending and not completed as of the petition date. As a result, administrative-expense treatment for these advances was requested by Dykes. Given the below resolution, the Debtors believe that Mr. Dykes deserves administrative-expense treatment for his pre-confirmation advances.

If the Plan goes effective under the reorganization alternative and the reorganized debtor emerges as an operating entity, Mr. Dykes will waive payment of his administrative-expense claim against from the Estates. In return for that waiver and his efforts in creating and partially funding the reorganized debtor for the benefit of the Estates and their creditors, the Estates will waive all claims against Mr. Dykes, and he will convert his administrative claim into increased equity ownership in the reorganized debtor or its affiliates.

If the Plan goes effective under the liquidation alternative, Mr. Dykes will retain his administrative claim and receive no release from the Estates. Instead, the estates will retain all claims, causes, and defenses against Mr. Dykes, including rights to assert that such a claim could be paid by offset any NR or other obligations owed by Rick Dykes to the Estates.

13 Percentage Distribution to Holders of Allowed Class 11 Claims is dependent on a variety of risks and factors, including the success of the Reorganized Debtors’ post-confirmation business operations, value of the Creditors Trust Assets, the administration costs of the Creditor Trust, and whether the Restructuring or Liquidation Alternative proceeds.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 29 of 68

Page 30: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 254842-6525-0690.16

CLASS

CLAIMANT TREATMENT: RESTRUCTURING

ALTERNATIVE

TREATMENT: LIQUIDATION ALTERNATIVE

UNSECURED CLAIMS OF FORD CREDIT14

payment in 2020, (ii) a $1 million cash payment in 2021, and (iii) a $5 million unsecured promissory note.

The $5 million unsecured promissory note will have the following terms: (i) 10-year amortization, (ii) 7-year balloon payment, (iii) 6.5% interest per annum, (iv) payment-in-kind interest for 12 months, and (v) payable thereafter from Excess Cash Flow.

final satisfaction and release of all Ford Credit’s Unsecured Claims against the Debtors, Ford Credit will receive its Pro Rata Share (calculated together with Allowed Claims in Classes 11, 13, 14 and 15) of Distributions from the Creditors Trust Assets. All Causes of Action against Ford Credit are reserved under this Plan.

13. UNSECURED CLAIMS OF GM FINANCIAL

GM Financial’s unsecured claim will be paid as follows: As a settlement and full and final satisfaction and release of all unsecured claims, GM Financial will receive (i) $750,000 from Excess Cash Flow by the later of (x) 180 days after the Effective Date and (y) payment of all Allowed Administrative Expenses and (ii) another $750,000 from Excess Cash Flow no later than twelve (12) months after the first payment of $750,000 to GM Financial.

GM Financial’s Allowed Unsecured Claim will be treated in Class 13 and paid as follows: In full and final satisfaction and release of all GM Financial’s Unsecured Claims against the Debtors, GM Financial will receive its Pro Rata Share (calculated together with Allowed Claims in Classes 11, 12, 14 and 15) of Distributions from the Creditors Trust Assets. All Causes of Action against GM Financial are reserved under the Liquidation Alternative in this Plan.

14 Classes 12 and 13 Claims are held by Ford Credit and GM Financial, respectively. Each is an affiliate of Original Equipment Manufacturers or “franchisors” that are parties to franchise or “dealer” agreements with one or more of the Debtors. The Class 12 and 13 Claims asserted by Ford Credit and GM Financial arise, in whole or in part from money loaned for the purchase of vehicles from the Original Equipment Manufacturers, and in Ford Credit’s case from allegations of out-of-trust sales or double floor-planned inventory as stated in pleadings in this Chapter 11 Case and the Ford Litigation. For those reasons, the Claims in Classes 12 and 13 are qualitatively dissimilar to Assumed Trade Claims in Class 10 or General Unsecured Claims in Class 11.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 30 of 68

Page 31: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 264842-6525-0690.16

CLASS

CLAIMANT TREATMENT: RESTRUCTURING

ALTERNATIVE

TREATMENT: LIQUIDATION ALTERNATIVE

14. UNSECURED CLAIMS OF IBC BANK

All prepetition claims of IBC Bank against the Debtors, held directly or indirectly, will be forgiven, and there will be no Distributions to Claims in Class 14.

Allowed Claims in Class 14 will receive their Pro Rata Share of the Creditors Trust Assets.

15. UNSECURED CLAIMS OF BART REAGOR AND RICK DYKES15

There will be no Distributions to Claims in Class 15.

Allowed Claims in Class 15 will receive their Pro Rata Share of the Creditors Trust Assets.

16. INTERCOMPANY CLAIMS

There will be no Distributions to Claims in Class 16.

There will be no Distributions to Claims in Class 16.

17. UNSECURED SUBORDINATED CLAIMS

There will be no Distributions to Claims in Class 17.

There will be no Distributions to Claims in Class 17.

18. INTERESTS IN THE DEBTORS

All Interests will be cancelled and discharged on the Effective Date, and no holder of an Interest shall receive a Distribution on account of such Interest.

All Interests will be cancelled and discharged on the Effective Date, and no holder of an Interest shall receive a Distribution on account of such Interest.

15 Class 15 includes Claims, if any, held by Insiders against the Debtors. The books and records of the Debtors show a note receivable in the amount of $9.5 million due from certain Insiders. Preliminarily, Messrs. Dykes and Reagor assert that the N/R balance in the Debtors’ books and records was not updated prior to the bankruptcy, because the Reagor-Dykes audit report for 2017 was in process when the initial bankruptcy cases were filed and was never completed. They assert that Messrs Dykes and Reagor raised over $18 million in new equity from savings and debt that they personally guaranteed from March 2017 to March 2018, and put at least $8.4 mm of cash into the Debtors during that time. As a result, Messrs Dykes and Reagor deny that they owe the bankruptcy estate any funds in connection with the above-described accounting entry. The Debtors will continue to investigate this situation and report to the Court. The estimated amount of the Class 15 Claims is unknown at this time. As part of a Restructuring under this Plan, the Holders of the Class 15 Claims have agreed to waive and forego all Unsecured Claims they hold against the Debtors and will receive no Distribution under this Plan.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 31 of 68

Page 32: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 274842-6525-0690.16

ARTICLE III HISTORICAL BACKGROUND AND PREPETITION BUSINESS OPERATIONS

The Debtor entities are comprise of eight (8) limited partnerships and three (3) general partners. The limited partnership Debtors are: Reagor-Dykes Motors, LP, Reagor-Dykes Floydada, LP, Reagor-Dykes Auto Company, LP, Reagor-Dykes Plainview, LP, Reagor-Dykes Amarillo, LP, Reagor-Dykes Imports, LP, Reagor-Dykes Snyder, L.P., and Reagor Auto Mall, Ltd. (the “LP Debtors”). The Debtors with general partnership interest in the LP Debtors are: Reagor Auto Mall I LLC, Reagor-Dykes II LLC, and Reagor-Dykes III LLC (the “GP Debtors”). Bart Reagor and Rick Dykes own fifty percent (50%) respectively in each GP Debtor. The organizational structure of the Debtors is as follows:

Section 3.1 GP Debtors.

The GP Debtors are each Texas limited liability companies. Each GP Debtor owns one percent (1%) interest in their respective LP Debtors.

Section 3.2 LP Debtors.

The LP Debtors are each Texas limited partnerships. The LP Debtors limited partners are Rick Dykes and Bart Reagor. Prepetition, the LP Debtors operated eight (8) Dealerships with seventeen (l7) Locations—sixteen in West Texas and one (1) in Dallas—as a consolidated group known as the Reagor-Dykes Auto Group. The following are the Dealerships with their corresponding Locations:

Debtor Location

Reagor-Dykes Auto Company, LP Reagor-Dykes Plainview Ford Lincoln

Reagor-Dykes Amarillo, LP Reagor-Dykes Mitsubishi Amarillo

Reagor-Dykes II LLC

Reagor Auto Mall I LLC

Reagor-Dykes III LLC

Reagor-Dykes Plainview, LP

Reagor-Dykes Snyder,

LP

ReagorAuto Mall, LP

Reagor-Dykes

Motors, LP

Reagor-Dykes

Amarillo, LP

Reagor-Dykes

Floydada LP

Reagor-Dykes

Imports, LP

Reagor-Dykes Auto Company, LP

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 32 of 68

Page 33: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 284842-6525-0690.16

Reagor-Dykes Auto Mall Amarillo

Reagor-Dykes Luxury

Reagor-Dykes Floydada, LP Reagor-Dykes Chevrolet

Reagor-Dykes Imports, LP Reagor-Dykes Mitsubishi Lubbock

Reagor-Dykes Motors, LP Spike Dykes Ford Lincoln

Reagor-Dykes Auto Mall Midland West

Reagor-Dykes Auto Mall Midland East

Reagor-Dykes Plainview, LP Reagor-Dykes Toyota

Reagor-Dykes Snyder, LP Reagor-Dykes Chevy Buick GMC

Reagor Auto Mall Ltd. Reagor Auto Mall Dallas

Reagor Auto Mall Downtown

Reagor Auto Mall

Reagor Auto Mall Imports

Reagor Auto Mall West

Reagor Leveland

FACTORS PRECIPITATING THE FILING OF THESE CHAPTER 11 CASES

A. Original Debtors

The RAM, Snyder and the Original Debtors’ business centers around selling used and new vehicles. Historically, RAM, Snyder and the Original Debtors owned or operated Dealerships that sold new and/or used vehicles from various original equipment manufacturers including but not limited to Ford, General Motors, Gulf States Toyota, Lincoln, and Mitsubishi. Although downsizing during the Chapter 11 Cases was unavoidable, prepetition the Debtors’ business employed hundreds of people in and around the Lubbock area.

The Original Debtors required floor plan financing to maintain inventory to sell. Essentially, floor plan financing provided the funds where by the Original Debtors acquired vehicles for resale to consumers. The Original Debtors’ primary floor plan financing came from Ford Motor Credit Company (“Ford Credit”). Ford Credit extended six loans to the Original Debtors with respective line limits on new and used vehicles. As a condition of the floor plan financing, Ford Credit was entitled to conduct periodic audits of the Original Debtors’ dealerships to confirm that the dealerships were in compliance with the terms of the financing agreements.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 33 of 68

Page 34: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 294842-6525-0690.16

Ford Credit conducted an audit in June of 2018. Consistent with prior audits, the Original Debtors received a clean bill of health and Ford Credit even commended the Original Debtors on their performance. Despite that positive audit in June, Ford Credit conducted another audit of the Original Debtors’ operations on July 26, 2018. Ford Credit claims that the July audit reflected that the Original Debtors failed to meet certain standards under their floor financing requirements. Based on these allegations, Ford Credit suddenly and immediately stopped funding the Original Debtors’ floor plan lines on July 30, 2018.

The consequences of this abrupt cessation in funding from Ford Credit were catastrophic. The Original Debtors did not anticipate the sudden withdrawal of a substantial portion of its floor plan lending. Due to the lack of financing from Ford Credit and the resulting freezing of the Original Debtors’ bank accounts, the Original Debtors did not have sufficient cashflow to sustain their business operations. In an effort to halt the damaging domino effect on consumers and employees and stabilize their business, the Original Debtors filed for protection under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code.

B. New Debtors

The New Debtors and the Original Debtors managed the dealerships and locations in a semi-integrated manner. Once the Original Debtors were operating as debtors-in-possession under the Bankruptcy Code, it became increasingly challenging for the New Debtors to operate their business unimpacted by the filing. Due to the public nature of the Original Debtors’ bankruptcy cases, the New Debtors’ floor plan lenders also became skeptical of the New Debtors’ ability to continue operations. Negotiations ensued with First Bank & Trust (“FBT”), the floor plan lender for RAM, and AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. d/b/a GM Financial (“GM Financial”), the floor plan lender for Snyder. Ultimately, FB&T applied for a writ of sequestration whereby FB&T could foreclose on its collateral – that collateral being the vehicles FB&T had “floored” pursuant to a floor plan financing agreement it had with RAM. The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Lubbock Division, entered an agreed order allowing FB&T to sequester the vehicles after a fourteen-day stay lapsed. The stay was set to expire on October 29, 2018. Because RAM could not operate without the collateral vehicles as inventory, and because discussions with GM Financial remained contentious, the New Debtors filed for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code.

ARTICLE IV MEANS FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLAN: RESTRUCTURING

ALTERNATIVE

On the Effective Date, the Reorganized Debtors will receive up to $13 million in cash from the Plan Sponsor to be used as working capital and to pay Allowed Claims pursuant to the Plan. In exchange for this Cash, the Reorganized Debtors will cancel all Interests in the Debtors, and issue 90% of the New Equity in the Reorganized Debtors to the Plan Sponsor. The Reorganized Debtors will issue the other 10% of the New Equity to the Creditors’ Trust. As set forth in the Plan, the Plan Sponsor is the entity(ies) owned by Auto Investment Group, SLJ Company or other investor identified in the Plan Supplement or at the Confirmation Hearing if SLJ Company declines to participate/invest into

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 34 of 68

Page 35: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 304842-6525-0690.16

the Reorganized Debtors, Rick Dykes, and Ron Blaylock.16 The initial equity percentages of ownership in the Plan Sponsor are as follows: (a) The Auto Investment Group = 65%; (b) SLJ Company = 20%; and (c) Ron Blaylock = 5%. Henry Resources is the primary investor in The Auto Investment Group.17

THE DEBTORS, WITH THE SUPPORT AND INPUT OF THE PLAN SPONSOR, HAVE PREPARED THE POST-CONFIRMATION BUSINESS PLAN INCLUSIVE OF THREE (3) YEAR PROJECTIONS OF THE INCOME AND OPERATIONAL EXPENSES OF THE REORGANIZED DEBTORS, INCLUSIVE OF ALL PAYMENTS DUE TO ALLOWED ADMINISTRATIVE CLAIMS, PRIORITY TAX CLAIMS, AND PRIORITY NON-TAX CLAIMS PURSUANT TO THE PLAN. THE DEBTORS AND THE PLAN SPONSOR BELIEVE THAT THESE PROJECTIONS ARE CONSERVATIVE, REASONABLE AND ACHIEVABLE. THE PROJECTIONS AND THE PLAN DO NOT REQUIRE THE CONTINUED PARTICIPATION OF FORD CREDIT, FB&T OR GM FINANCIAL AS A FLOOR PLAN LENDER. IF FORD CREDIT, FB&T AND/OR GM FINANCIAL DO NOT WISH TO PROVIDE FLOOR PLAN FINANCING TO THE REORGANIZED DEBTORS, THEN THE REORGANIZED DEBTORS WILL PROCURE AN EXIT LENDER. THE DEBTORS ARE CONFIDENT AND OPTIMISTIC THAT THE BUSINESS CONTACTS AND RELATIONSHIPS THE PLAN SPONSOR MAINTAINS IN THE INDUSTRY WILL YIELD A LENDER TO PROVIDE FLOOR PLAN FINANCING SUFFICIENT FOR THE REORGANIZED DEBTORS TO CONTINUE OPERATIONS. THE PROJECTIONS ARE ATTACHED AS EXHIBIT B.

ARTICLE V MEANS FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLAN: LIQUIDATION ALTERNATIVE

Under the Liquidation Alternative, the Plan will effect an orderly wind down of the Debtors’ business operations, a controlled liquidation of all Collateral, appointment of the Creditors Trustee, and the transfer of all Causes of Action to the Creditors Trust. Ford Credit asserts a "replacement" lien in certain assets, including non-Chapter 5 claims and causes of action. It is unclear whether Ford Credit in fact asserts a lien on tort claims held by the Debtors. But there is no bona fide argument that such “replacement” lien covers any commercial tort claim or causes of action. As a result, the Debtors dispute any suggestion that this replacement lien (a) covers more collateral than Ford Credit’s lien covered pre-bankruptcy, (b) is not limited to diminution in value, and (c) has any value given Ford Credit’s believed involvement in the pre-bankruptcy business. All Assets and all Causes of Action, inclusive of all rights to challenge the extent, priority and validity of alleged liens thereon, and all Collateral not surrendered under the terms of the Plan will be transferred to the Creditors Trust. All Holders of Allowed Unsecured Claims will receive a beneficial interest in the Creditors Trust equal to the Pro Rata amount of their Allowed Unsecured Claim, and the Creditors Trustee will make

16 Rick Dykes is not an investor in Auto Investment Group or SLJ Company. Henry Resources is the primary investor in the Auto Investment Group. Both Auto Investment Group and SLJ Company will continue their respective diligence up to the Confirmation Hearing.

17 The Plan Sponsor Superpriority Claim, if any, may be converted to its Pro Rata Share or other amount agreed by the Reorganized Debtor and Plan Sponsor of the 90% of New Equity in the Reorganized Debtors allocated to the Plan Sponsor.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 35 of 68

Page 36: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 314842-6525-0690.16

distributions to all Allowed Unsecured Claims pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Plan and a Creditors Trust Agreement.

ARTICLE VI ASSETS OF THE DEBTORS ON THE PETITION DATE

The following is a summary description of each of the Debtors’ known principal assets as of the Petition Date. The information has been compiled from the Debtors’ audited and unaudited records as reflected in the Debtors’ Schedules, Statements of Financial Affairs and Monthly Operating Reports. As a result of developments during the Chapter 11 Case, the asset base of the Debtors has changed substantially. The Debtors have attached as Exhibit H, which is a current balance sheet reflecting the Debtors’ current assets on a consolidated basis as of March 31, 2019.

Section 6.1 Debtors’ Assets.

Reagor-Dykes Motors, LP

a) Personal Property: As of the Petition Date, Reagor-Dykes Motors, LP had personal property in the amount of $32,076,136.31 based on: (i) accounts receivable18 amounting to $4,078,162.00; (ii) cash and cash equivalents amounting to $3,078,898.64; (iii) deposits and prepayments amounting to $1,300; (iv) inventory amounting to $21,896,597.00; (v) office furniture, fixtures, and equipment amounting to $98,330.25; (vi) machinery, equipment, and vehicles amounting to $53,294.67.

b) Real Property: As of the Petition Date, Reagor-Dykes Motors, LP had real property in the amount of $609,871.17.

c) Intellectual Property: As of the Petition Date, Reagor-Dykes Motors, LP had intellectual property amounting to $23,923.75.

d) Other Property: As of the Petition Date, Reagor-Dykes Motors, LP had other property (including notes receivable from Bart Reagor and Rick Dykes) amounting to $2,845,630.00.

Reagor-Dykes Auto Company, LP

a) Personal Property: As of the Petition Date, Reagor-Dykes Auto Company, LP had personal property in the amount of $19,296,940.86 based on: (i) accounts receivable amounting to $2,178,854.00; (ii) cash and cash equivalents amounting to $1,686,931.89; (iii) deposits and prepayments amounting to $740.00; (iv) inventory amounting to $12,686,580.00; (v) office

18 As explained in the Global Notes filed with the Bankruptcy Schedules, the Bankruptcy Schedules were unaudited.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 36 of 68

Page 37: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 324842-6525-0690.16

furniture, fixtures, and equipment amounting to $428,214.92; (vi) machinery, equipment, and vehicles amounting to $167,949.05.

b) Real Property: As of the Petition Date, Reagor-Dykes Auto Company, LP had real property in the amount of $930,352.34.

c) Intellectual Property: As of the Petition Date, Reagor-Dykes Auto Company, LP had intellectual property amounting to $16,723.00.

d) Other Property: As of the Petition Date, Reagor-Dykes Auto Company, LP had other property (including notes receivable from Bart Reagor and Rick Dykes) amounting to $1,948,948.00.

Reagor-Dykes Amarillo, LP

a) Personal Property: As of the Petition Date, Reagor-Dykes Amarillo, LP had personal property in the amount of $8,270,334.33 based on: (i) accounts receivable amounting to $989,443.00; (ii) cash and cash equivalents amounting to $670,650.00; (iii) deposits and prepayments amounting to $850; (iv) inventory amounting to $5,983,952.00; (v) office furniture, fixtures, and equipment amounting to $81,310.83; (vi) machinery, equipment, and vehicles amounting to $94,128.50.

b) Real Property: As of the Petition Date, Reagor-Dykes Amarillo, LP had real property in the amount of $332,190.25.

c) Intellectual Property: None.

d) Other Property: As of the Petition Date, Reagor-Dykes Amarillo, LP had other property (including notes receivable from Bart Reagor and Rick Dykes) amounting to $450,000.

Reagor-Dykes Floydada, LP

a) Personal Property: As of the Petition Date, Reagor-Dykes Floydada, LP had personal property in the amount of $12,379,837.00 based on: (i) accounts receivable amounting to $1,026,592.00; (ii) cash and cash equivalents amounting to $326,208.00; (iii) deposits and prepayments amounting to $1,683.00; (iv) inventory amounting to $9,745,042.00; (v) office furniture, fixtures, and equipment amounting to $31,287.00; (vi) machinery, equipment, and vehicles amounting to $177,150.00.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 37 of 68

Page 38: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 334842-6525-0690.16

b) Real Property: As of the Petition Date, Reagor-Dykes Floydada, LP had real property in the amount of $285,352.00.

c) Intellectual Property: As of the Petition Date, Reagor-Dykes Floydada, LP had intellectual property amounting to $66,223.00.

d) Other Property: As of the Petition Date, Reagor-Dykes Floydada, LP had other property (including notes receivable from Bart Reagor and Rick Dykes) amounting to $297,500.

Reagor-Dykes Imports, LP

a) Personal Property: As of the Petition Date, Reagor-Dykes Imports, LP had personal property in the amount of $12,194,433.91 based on: (i) accounts receivable amounting to $1,694,378.00; (ii) cash and cash equivalents amounting to $1,435,812.16; (iii) inventory amounting to $7,659,216.00; (v) machinery, equipment, and vehicles amounting to $107,643.75.

b) Real Property: As of the Petition Date, Reagor-Dykes Imports, LP had real property in the amount of $232,190.08.

c) Intellectual Property: As of the Petition Date, Reagor-Dykes Imports, LP had intellectual property amounting to $28,250.00.

d) Other Property: As of the Petition Date, Reagor-Dykes Imports, LP had other property (including notes receivable from Bart Reagor and Rick Dykes) amounting to $1,269,134.00.

Reagor-Dykes Plainview, LP

a) Personal Property: As of the Petition Date, Reagor-Dykes Plainview, LP had personal property in the amount of $14,168,106.35 based on: (i) accounts receivable amounting to $1,414,088.00; (ii) cash and cash equivalents amounting to $2,196,118.68; (iii) inventory amounting to $10,296,320.00; (v) office furniture, fixtures, and equipment amounting to $38,623.67; (vi) machinery, equipment, and vehicles amounting to $63,622.00.

b) Real Property: As of the Petition Date, Reagor-Dykes Plainview, LP had real property in the amount of $174,897.08.

c) Intellectual Property: As of the Petition Date, Reagor-Dykes Plainview, LP did not have any intellectual property.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 38 of 68

Page 39: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 344842-6525-0690.16

d) Other Property: As of the Petition Date, Reagor-Dykes Plainview LP had other property (including notes receivable from Bart Reagor and Rick Dykes) amounting to $159,334.00.

Reagor-Dykes Snyder, LP

a) Personal Property: As of the Petition Date, Reagor-Dykes Snyder, LP had personal property in the amount of $15,674,302.00 based on: (i) accounts receivable amounting to $2,065,745.00; (ii) cash and cash equivalents amounting to $8,918.00; (iii) deposits and prepayments amounting to $465.00; (iv) inventory amounting to $13,319,142.00; (v) office furniture, fixtures, and equipment amounting to $77,048.00; (vi) machinery, equipment, and vehicles amounting to $202,984.00.

b) Real Property: As of the Petition Date, Reagor-Dykes Snyder, LP did not have any real property.

c) Intellectual Property: As of the Petition Date, Reagor-Dykes Snyder, LP did not have any intellectual property.

d) Other Property: As of the Petition Date, Reagor-Dykes Snyder, LP did not have any other property.

Reagor Auto Mall, Ltd.

a) Personal Property: As of the Petition Date, Reagor Auto Mall, Ltd. had personal property in the amount of $12,582,918.21 based on: (i) accounts receivables amounting to $1,915,270.55; (ii) cash and cash equivalents amounting to $1,047,402.91; (iii) deposits and prepayments amounting to $5,786.19; and (iv) inventory amounting to $7,119,136.56.

b) Real Property: As of the Petition Date, Reagor Auto Mall, Ltd. did not have any real property.

c) Intellectual Property: As of the Petition Date, Reagor Auto Mall, Ltd. did not have any intellectual property.

d) Other Property: As of the Petition Date, Reagor Auto Mall, Ltd. had other property (including notes receivable from Bart Reagor and Rick Dykes) amounting to $2,495,322.00.

Reagor-Dykes II LLC

As noted elsewhere in this Disclosure Statement, Reagor-Dykes II LLC is the general partner of Debtor Reagor-Dykes Auto Company, LP. Reagor-Dykes II LLC owns a 1%

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 39 of 68

Page 40: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 354842-6525-0690.16

interest in Debtor Reagor-Dykes Auto Company, LP’s outstanding equity partnership units. Other than the above, the Schedules reflect the following as to Reagor-Dykes II LLC:

a) Personal Property: As of the Petition Date, Reagor-Dykes II LLC did not have any personal property.

b) Real Property: As of the Petition Date, Reagor-Dykes II LLC did not have any real property.

c) Intellectual Property: As of the Petition Date, Reagor-Dykes II LLC did not have any intellectual property.

d) Other Property: As of the Petition Date, Reagor-Dykes II LLC did not have any other property.

Reagor-Dykes III LLC

As noted elsewhere in this Disclosure Statement, Reagor-Dykes III LLC is the general partner of Debtor Reagor-Dykes Plainview, LP. Reagor-Dykes III LLC owns a 1% interest in Debtor Reagor-Dykes Plainview, LP’s outstanding equity partnership units. Other than the above, the Schedules reflect the following as to Reagor-Dykes III LLC:

a) Personal Property: As of the Petition Date, Reagor-Dykes III LLC did not have any personal property.

b) Real Property: As of the Petition Date, Reagor-Dykes III LLC did not have any real property.

c) Intellectual Property: As of the Petition Date, Reagor-Dykes III LLC did not have any intellectual property.

d) Other Property: As of the Petition Date, Reagor-Dykes III LLC did not have any other property.

Reagor Auto Mall I LLC

As noted elsewhere in this Disclosure Statement, Reagor Auto Mall I LLC is the general partner of Debtors Reagor-Dykes Motors, LP, Reagor-Dykes Amarillo, LP, Reagor-Dykes Floydada, LP, Reagor-Dykes Imports, LP, Reagor Auto Mall, Ltd. and Reagor-Dykes Snyder, LP. Reagor Dykes II LLC owns a 1% interest in each of these listed debtor’s outstanding equity partnership units. Other than the above, the Schedules reflect the following as to Reagor Auto Mall I LLC:

a) Personal Property: As of the Petition Date, Reagor Auto Mall I LLC did not have any personal property.

b) Real Property: As of the Petition Date, Reagor Auto Mall I LLC did not have any real property.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 40 of 68

Page 41: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 364842-6525-0690.16

c) Intellectual Property: As of the Petition Date, Reagor Auto Mall I LLC did not have any intellectual property.

d) Other Property: As of the Petition Date, Reagor Auto Mall I LLC did not have any other property.

Section 6.2 Claims and Causes of Action of Debtors.

a) The Debtors held the following claims and causes of action that were pending as of the Petition Date:

Style of Case Status

Reagor Auto Mall, Ltd. v. Heather Morris Pending

Reagor Auto Mall v. Monica Rosendo Pending

Reagor Dykes Imports, LP, Reagor-Dykes Auto Company, LP, Reagor-Dykes Plainview, LP v. Vista Bank

Ongoing adversary in bankruptcy case no. 18-50214

b) As detailed in the Plan and except as otherwise compromised and settled pursuant to the Plan, pursuant to § 1123(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, all Causes of Action are preserved under the Plan and the Reorganized Debtors or the Creditors Trustee, as the case may be, shall, on behalf of the Debtors, retain the exclusive authority and all rights to enforce, commence, and pursue, as appropriate, any and all Causes of Action, including, without limitation, (i) any potential Cause of Action arising from or related to any transfer or other actions or omissions referenced in each of the Debtors’ Schedules or Statement of Financial Affairs, as same may be amended (ii) any potential Causes of Action against any past or present insider of the Debtors, (iii) any causes of action related to the extent, validity, and priority of any liens, (iv) any actions for breach of contract, (v) any actions arising in tort, (vi) any actions against retail lenders who have failed to fund vehicle purchases to the Debtors – sometimes called “contracts in transit,” and (vi) any action listed on attached Exhibit E. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Debtors retain and preserve any and all Causes of Action, except as otherwise compromised and settled pursuant to the Plan, against some or all of the Debtors’ prepetition lenders, including but not limited to Ford Credit, GM Financial, First Capital Bank, FB&T, IBC Bank, and Vista Bank (collectively, the “Lenders”) and against the Debtors’ prepetition independent auditor Lane Gorman Trubitt, LLC (“Auditor”):

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 41 of 68

Page 42: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 374842-6525-0690.16

(i) Claims Against Lenders: The Estates’ claims against the Lenders include, but are not limited to: (1) claims for wrongful setoff or seizure of estate funds and damages for the expense of preserving bank collateral during the chapter 11 case, namely (i) section 506 surcharge claims and other claims arising from status as prepetition floor plan lender against, among others, GM Financial, Ford Credit, FirstCapital, and FB&T, which provided floor-plan financing to several Debtors that the Debtors secured by inventory collateral without compensation, (ii) a security claim against IBC Bank, which provided real-estate financing to Reagor-Dykes through a Reagor-Dykes affiliate that leased real estate to the Reagor-Dykes dealerships (and the Estates preserved this real estate collateral during the Bankruptcy Cases), (iii) section 553 avoidance claims for millions of dollars of the Estates’ cash deposits that were “trapped” at one or more of the Lenders who have not provided an accounting of the cash deposits, (iv) section 553 avoidance claims against the banks that froze money paid into the Debtors’ accounts by retail lenders who financed cars sold by the Debtors and then setoff against debts owed by the Debtors to the Lenders, and (v) section 548 fraudulent transfer claims against the Lenders that held certificates of deposit as collateral even though not all of the Debtors owed money to those Lenders; and (2) damages claims, including but not limited to those against (i) First Capital Bank, FB&T, and Vista Bank, who knew or should have known that the Debtors’ former chief financial officer was using accounts at FB&T in an illegal check-kiting scheme but still charged the Debtors exorbitant bank charges related to the scheme and helped hide the practices of the former CFO that drove the company into bankruptcy, and (ii) First Capital Bank, who failed to fulfill a $2.1 million extension of floor-plan financing to RAM during the bankruptcy cases of the Original Debtors despite receiving more than $7.5 million in additional security from the Reagor-Dykes owners.

(ii) Claims Against Ford Credit: The Estates’ additional claims against Ford Credit include, without limitation, (a) lender-liability claims regarding whether Ford Credit (which provided floor-plan financing to Reagor-Dykes and rated its two previous audits of Reagor-Dykes as exemplary) knew, or should have known, on

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 42 of 68

Page 43: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 384842-6525-0690.16

or before July 30, 2018, about the selling-out-of-trust sales or double-pledged inventory for which the Debtors’ former CFO has now taken responsibility, and whether Ford Credit had a special duty to notify the Debtor’s owners of its CFO’s misconduct and given the owners a reasonable opportunity to correct the problems before withdrawing its financing and filing its lawsuit on July 31, 2018; (b) tort claims regarding whether Ford Credit tortiously interfered with RAM’s floor-plan loan agreement with First Capital Bank when Ford Credit’s lawyers notified First Capital Bank that Ford Credit was asserting a priming lien on certain RAM inventory that took priority over First Capital Bank’s lien securing floor-plan financing which interference deterred First Capital Bank from fulfilling $2.1 million in floor-plan financing to RAM, for which RAM had pledged $7.5 million in collateral to FirstCapital; (c) the section 506 surcharge claims described above; and (4) any section 547 or 548 avoidance actions against Ford Credit, because Ford Credit may have received payments from non-collateral and received payments while an unsecured creditor and outside of the ordinary course of business. The lawsuit filed against Ford Credit by IBC, which outlines some of the causes of action that the Debtors expect to bring against Ford Credit and maybe others if the restructuring option is not implemented, is attached as Exhibit F.19

(iii) Claims Against Auditor: The Estates’ claims against the auditor include, without limitation, all Causes of Action arising from or related to Auditor’s written reports and opinions regarding the financial position of the Debtors in 2015 and 2016, whether sounding in contract or tort, and specifically including negligence, gross negligence and/or negligent misrepresentation in performing its audit work, breach of warranty; claims under the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act; and/or breach of the duty to exercise reasonable care in rendering professional services as an independent auditor via the failure to detect accounting irregularities and/or in excess of $5.9 million in fraudulent

19 The Debtors are not parties to “guaranty litigation” between Bart Reagor and Ford Motor Credit and have not been made aware of such litigation by Ford Credit. But, to the extent any party believes the status of such litigation is relevant, the Debtors advise that it understands Ford Credit received summary judgment on guaranty liability against Bart Reagor and a jury trial on damages, offset, etc. is set for October 2019.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 43 of 68

Page 44: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 394842-6525-0690.16

accounting entries, the failure to comply with generally accepted auditing standards, failure to obtain reasonable assurance regarding whether the Debtors’ 2015 balance sheets and 2016 financial statements were free from material misstatements, and the failure to detect and disclose a $25 million material debt repayment prior to the issuance of the 2016 audit report.

c) As with most large and complex Chapter 11 cases, the Debtors’ Causes of Action (including Chapter 5 Causes of Action) have not yet been analyzed. The failure to list or describe any Cause of Action herein is not intended to limit the rights of the Reorganized Debtors to pursue any known or unknown Cause of Action. Unless Causes of Action against a Person or Entity are expressly waived, relinquished, released, compromised or settled herein or any Final Order, the Debtors or the Estates (before the Effective Date) and the Debtors and the Reorganized Debtors (as applicable), expressly reserve all Causes of Action (including the unknown Causes of Action) for later adjudication and therefore, no preclusion doctrine or other rule of law, including, without limitation, the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, issue preclusion, claim preclusion, estoppel (judicial, equitable or otherwise) or laches, shall apply to such Causes of Action upon, after, or as a result of the confirmation or Effective Date of the Plan, or the Confirmation Order. In addition, the Debtors and the Estates, and the Reorganized Debtors, expressly reserve the right to pursue or adopt any Claims not so waived, relinquished, released, compromised, or settled that are alleged in any lawsuit in which one of the Debtors or Estates is a defendant or an interested party, against any Person or Entity, including, without limitation, the plaintiffs and co-defendants in such lawsuits. No Entity may rely on the absence of a specific reference in the Plan, the Plan Supplement Documents, or the Disclosure Statement to any Cause of Action against them as any indication that the Trustee, on behalf of the Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors will not pursue any and all available Causes of Action against them. The Debtors and the Reorganized Debtors expressly reserve all rights to prosecute any and all Causes of Action other than Causes of Action settled, resolved or released pursuant to this Plan.

d) For the avoidance of doubt, the Reorganized Debtors reserve and shall retain all Causes of Action notwithstanding the rejection or repudiation of any Executory Contract or Unexpired Lease and will continue to review payments made

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 44 of 68

Page 45: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 404842-6525-0690.16

by and transactions involving the Debtors prior to the Petition Date to determine whether preference and other actions to avoid such payments and transactions should be brought. The Reorganized Debtors shall have the exclusive right, authority, and discretion to determine and to initiate, File, prosecute, enforce, abandon, settle, compromise, release, withdraw, or litigate to judgment any such Causes of Action and to decline to do any of the foregoing without the consent or approval of any third party or further notice to or action, order, or approval of the Bankruptcy Court. The Reorganized Debtors shall have the right to identify any additional Causes of Action prior to the Effective Date of the Plan.

IN REVIEWING THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT AND THE PLAN, AND IN DETERMINING WHETHER TO VOTE IN FAVOR OF OR AGAINST THE PLAN, HOLDERS OF CLAIMS AND INTERESTS (INCLUDING PARTIES THAT RECEIVED PAYMENTS FROM THE DEBTORS WITHIN NINETY (90) DAYS PRIOR TO THE PETITION DATE) SHOULD CONSIDER THAT A CAUSE OF ACTION MAY EXIST AGAINST THEM, THAT THE PLAN PRESERVES ALL CAUSES OF ACTION, AND THAT THE PLAN AUTHORIZES THE REORGANIZED DEBTORS TO PROSECUTE THE SAME.

All rights, if any, of a defendant to assert a claim arising from relief granted in any Cause of Action, together with the Reorganized Debtors’ right to oppose such claim are fully preserved.

ARTICLE VII LIABILITIES OF THE DEBTORS

Section 7.1 Administrative Claims: All Debtors. Administrative Claims are any claims defined in §503(b) of the Code as “administrative expenses” and granted priority under § 507(a)(1) of the Code, including:

a) Claim for any cost or expense of administration in connection with the Case, including, without limitation, any actual, necessary cost or expense of preserving the Debtor’s estate and of operating the business of the Debtors incurred on or before the Effective Date;

b) the full amount of all Claims for compensation for legal, accounting and other services or reimbursement of costs under §§330, 331 or 503 of the Bankruptcy Code;

c) all fees and charges assessed against the Debtors’ estates under Chapter 123 of Title 28 of the United States Code; and

d) a Claim for post-petition taxes and related items, including any interest and penalties on such post-petition taxes.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 45 of 68

Page 46: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 414842-6525-0690.16

Allowed Administrative Claims will be paid as follows: under the Restructuring as soon as reasonably practicable following the later to occur of: (a) the Effective Date and (b) the date on which such Administrative Claim becomes an Allowed Administrative Claim The following are the asserted outstanding Administrative Claims owed by the Debtors:

a) Professionals. Under the Plan, all professionals employed pursuant to §§ 327 and 330 shall be required to file with the Bankruptcy Court a final fee application within sixty (60) days after the Effective Date. As of June 30, 2019, accrued but unpaid professional fees and expenses against the Estates are in the aggregate approximate amount of $5 million. Nothing in the Plan or this Disclosure Statement is intended to restrict the ability of any party in interest or the U.S. Trustee to object to any final fee applications.

b) SAWCO Industries, LLC Administrative Claim. SAWCO Industries, LLC filed a request for administrative claim in the amount of $31,500.00 for post-petition goods, accessories, and equipment described in its application for compensation.

c) Earl Owen Co. Administrative Claim. Earl Owen Co. filed an application for allowance and payment of administrative expense claim in the amount of $92,312.97 for automotive goods and accessories delivered to the Debtors 20 days prior to the petition date.

d) Covenant Health System. Covenant Health System filed its application for administrative expenses amounting to $147,407.86, but after negotiation with the Debtors have agreed to the reduced amount of $82,247.77.

e) Reagan National Advertising of Austin. Reagan National Advertising of Austin filed its application for administrative expenses amounting to $9,716.43.

f) CDK Global, LLC. CDK Global, LLC has filed multiple proofs of claim against the Debtors in the aggregate amount of $129,029.61 asserting, in addition to unsecured claims, entitlement to an alleged administrative claim in an unspecified amount. Representations in CDK Global’s objection to the Disclosure Statement indicate that any request for administrative claim will be properly and timely filed by CDK Global. The Debtors have not verified or agreed to CDK Global’s alleged entitlement to an administrative claim. Both the Debtors and CDK Global reserve all rights incident to this alleged administrative claim.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 46 of 68

Page 47: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 424842-6525-0690.16

g) Eighty Second Street Investments, LLC and Lubbock Windmill Investments, LLC. Eighty Second Street Investments, LLC and Lubbock Windmill Investments, LLC asserts that it holds an administrative claim against the Debtors in the amount of $351,553.14 for postpetition unpaid rent. Eighty Second Street Investments, LLC and Lubbock Windmill Investments, LLC have filed a proof of claim, claim number 142 setting forth this amount but have not yet filed a request for payment of administrative-expense claim as required by section 503(a) of the Code although Eighty Second Street Investments, LLC and Lubbock Windmill Investments, LLC do intend to do so timely. The Debtors have not verified or agreed to the asserted amount of Eighty Second Street Investments, LLC and Lubbock Windmill Investments, LLC’s alleged administrative-expense claim. Both the Debtors and Eighty Second Street Investments, LLC and Lubbock Windmill Investments, LLC reserve all rights incident to this alleged administrative-expense claim.

h) Ford Credit. Ford Credit has indicated that it believes that it is entitled to assert an administrative claim in the amount of approximately $3.5 million under the various cash collateral orders entered during the Case. The Debtors have not verified or agreed to the asserted amount of Ford Credit’s alleged administrative-expense claim. As a result, the Debtors expect to object to any such asserted claim by Ford Credit, especially given the circumstances of the cases.

i) Other Asserted Administrative Claims. A review of the docket on June 28, 2019, reveals that no other requests for administrative expense payments have been filed in this case.

Section 7.2 Scheduled Secured and Priority Claims, Pending Litigation.

The scheduled and filed Claim amounts listed below do not include the accrual of interest after the filing of the Cases, to the extent such post-petition interest may be applicable.

a) Secured Claims: Scheduled: The Schedules reflect the following Secured Claims, listed below by the respective Debtor:

Debtor Secured Lender Amount

Reagor-Dykes Auto Company, LP

AIM Bank $357,915.06

First Capital Bank $2,442,093.00

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 47 of 68

Page 48: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 434842-6525-0690.16

Ford Credit $16,223,320.17

Vista Bank $792,500.00

Vista Bank $367,500.00

Reagor-Dykes Motors, LP Ford Credit $31,983,007.90

Ford Credit $3,916,674.00

Reagor-Dykes Plainview, LP AIM Bank $457,166.57

First Capital Bank $2,442,093.00

Ford Credit $15,964,252.12

Vista Bank $848,443.89

Vista Bank $596,880.00

Reagor-Dykes Amarillo, LP Ford Credit $9,287,555.82

First Capital Bank $2,442,093.00

Reagor-Dykes Floydada, LP Ford Credit $18,821,873.00

First Capital Bank $2,580,498.00

Reagor-Dykes Imports, LP First Capital Bank $2,442,093.00

Ford Credit $12,894,777.94

Vista Bank $359,056.11

Vista Bank $992,847.52

Reagor Auto Mall, Ltd. First Bank & Trust $3,257,100.00

First Capital Bank $9,575,238.80

First Capital Bank $308,850.00

Liberty Capital Bank $431,150.00

Reagor-Dykes Snyder, LP GM Financial Commercial Lending Service

$14,662,298.00

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 48 of 68

Page 49: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 444842-6525-0690.16

Secured Claims: Claims Register: The claims register reflects the following secured claims filed against each Debtor: Reagor-Dykes Motors, LP in the amount of $44,742,592.60, Reagor-Dykes Auto Company, LP in the amount of $30,039,843.26, Reagor-Dykes Plainview, LP in the amount of $24,447,326.74, Reagor-Dykes Floydada, LP in the amount of $22,708,430.64, Reagor-Dykes Imports, LP in the amount of $22,652,073.83, Reagor-Dykes Amarillo, LP in the amount of $18,049,369.10, Reagor-Dykes Snyder, L.P. in the amount of $28,555,095.50, Reagor Auto Mall, Ltd. in the amount of $19,966,237.30.

b) Priority Claims: The Schedules reflect the following Priority Claims, listed below by the respective Debtor:

Debtor Amount

Reagor-Dykes Auto Company, LP $171,185.00

Reagor-Dykes Motors, LP $212,107.00

Reagor-Dykes Plainview, LP $91,027.00

Reagor-Dykes Amarillo, LP $76,175.00

Reagor-Dykes Floydada, LP $75,526.00

Reagor-Dykes Imports, LP $146,189.00

Reagor Auto Mall, Ltd. $442,382.55

Reagor-Dykes Snyder, LP $29,839.00

c) Claims Asserted by the Texas Attorney General’s Office: The Texas Comptroller asserts that the below-referenced tax obligations of Debtors Reagor Auto Mall Ltd. and Reagor-Dykes Snyder, L.P. are secured by tax liens, notices of which were filed in Lubbock County on October 29, 2018. The Comptroller further states that although the lien notices refer to a specific

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 49 of 68

Page 50: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 454842-6525-0690.16

obligation, each lien secures all taxes, penalty, and interest owed to the Comptroller which may have accrued before or after the filing of the notice pursuant to Tex. Tax Code §§ 113.001 and 113.006(b), and that each tax lien continues until such time as the taxpayer owes nothing to the Comptroller per Tex. Tax Code §113.105(a). Because each referenced Debtor continuously owed outstanding taxes to the Comptroller since the lien notice filing, the Comptroller asserts, all tax obligations owed by these two Debtors are secured by the tax liens. The priority of these liens is determined by the timing of filing of the tax lien notices, vis-à-vis other secured creditors, in accordance with the time frames for objections to claims as set forth in the Plan.

Case No. Debtor Amount Tax Type Asserted Claim Type Date Claim No.

18-50214 Reagor-Dykes Motors LP $138,244.18 Sales Admin Exp 3/25/2019

145-1 (amending 34)

$12,840.39 Sales Prepetition 3/25/201933-2 (amending33-1)

$2,000.00 Franchise Prepetition 10/25/2018 32-1

$153,084.57

18-50215 Reagor-Dykes Imports LP $3,052.34 Sales Prepetition 3/25/2019

11-2 (amending 11-1)

$36,041.85 Sales Admin Exp 3/25/201912-2 (amending 12-1)

$39,094.19

18-50216 Reagor-Dykes Amarillo, LP $8,037.55 Sales Admin Exp 3/25/2019 54-1

$687.31 Sales Prepetition 3/26/201913-2 (amending 13-1)

$2,000.00 Franchise Prepetition 10/18/2018 12/1

$10,724.86

18-50217

Reagor-Dykes Auto Company LP $68,693.60 Sales Admin Exp 3/25/2019

25-2 (amending 25-1)

$3,587.76 Sales Prepetition 3/25/2019 24-2

$2,000.00 Franchise Prepetition 10/26/2018 23-1

$74,281.36

18-50218 Reagor-Dykes Plainview, LP $20,364.34 Sales Admin Exp 3/25/2019 10/2

$1,652.90 Sales Prepetition 3/25/2019 9/2

$2,000.00 Franchise Prepetition 10/24/2018 8/1

$24,017.24

18-50219 Reagor-Dykes Floydada, LP $21,338.55 Sales Admin Exp 3/26/2019 11/2

$2,190.72 Sales Prepetition 3/26/2019 10/2

$2,000.00 Franchise Prepetition 10/25/2018 9/1

$25,529.27

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 50 of 68

Page 51: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 464842-6525-0690.16

18-50321 Reagor-Dykes Snyder, LP $11,114.94 Sales Prepetition 1/24/2019 23-1 [secured]

$24,043.16 Sales Admin Exp 3/25/2019

24-2

(amending

24-1)

$1,000.00 Franchise Prepetition 1/24/2019 25-1 [secured]

$36,158.10

18-50322 Reagor-Dykes III, LLC

18-50323 Reagor-Dykes II, LLC

18-50324 Reagor Auto Mall, Ltd $74,032.42 Sales Admin Exp 3/22/2019 46-1

$27,454.78 Sales Prepetition 3/22/2019 45-1

$1,442,427.49 Franchise Prepetition 3/22/2019 43-1

$4,077.55 IFTA Prepetition 3/22/2019 42-1

$1,547,992.24

18-50325 Reagor Auto Mall I, LLC $95,189.13 Sales Prepetition 4/18/2019 19-1

d) Pending Litigation: The Debtors list the following litigation filed against one or more of the Debtors that was pending as of the Petition Date:

Style of Case Status

Zigler Motors, Inc. v. Reagor Auto Mall, Ltd. & Reagor Auto Mall I, LLC

Administratively closed; Suggestion of bankruptcy filed.

James Wood Autopark v. Reagor Auto Mall, Ltd. Pending; Suggestion of bankruptcy filed.

Citizens State Bank v. Texas Department of Motor Vehicles and Reagor-Dykes Snyder, L.P.

Pending; Suggestion of bankruptcy filed.

First Bank and Trust v. Reagor Auto Mall, Ltd., et. al.

Pending; Suggestion of bankruptcy filed.

Nyle Maxwell of Taylor, LLC v. Reagor Auto Mall, Ltd. et. al.

Pending; Suggestion of bankruptcy filed.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 51 of 68

Page 52: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 474842-6525-0690.16

Style of Case Status

World Motors, LLC v. Reagor-Dykes Dallas, LP, Reagor Auto Mall, Ltd., et. al.

Pending; Suggestion of bankruptcy filed.

MUSA Auto Leasing and Edward Lee Mitchell v. Family Dealership Group, LLC and Reagor Auto Mall

Pending

ND Auto Sales, LLC v. Reagor Auto Mall, Ltd. Pending

Vandergriff v. Reagor Auto Mall, Ltd., et. al. Pending

Section 7.3 Unsecured Claims.

The Schedules of each individual Debtor reflect Unsecured Claims in the following amounts: Reagor-Dykes Motors, LP in the amount of $2,171,246.74, Reagor-Dykes Auto Company, LP in the amount of $1,798,097.23, Reagor-Dykes Plainview, LP in the amount of $1,194,015.63, Reagor-Dykes Floydada, LP in the amount of $628,889.03, Reagor-Dykes Imports, LP in the amount of $2,138,876.83, Reagor-Dykes Amarillo, LP in the amount of $1,458,492.84, Reagor-Dykes Snyder, L.P. in the amount of $2,926,075.80, Reagor Auto Mall, Ltd. in the amount of $13,858,386.07.

The claims registers for each individual Debtor reflect Unsecured Claims asserted in the following amounts: Reagor-Dykes Motors, LP in the amount of $140,182,189.64,Reagor-Dykes Auto Company, LP in the amount of $ 144,744,831.79, Reagor-Dykes Plainview, LP in the amount of $ 148,555,514.12, Reagor-Dykes Floydada, LP in the amount of $ $149,151,071.06, Reagor-Dykes Imports, LP in the amount of $153,007,764.29, Reagor-Dykes Amarillo, LP in the amount of $154,947,354.34, Reagor-Dykes Snyder, L.P. in the amount of $ 41,286,253.33, Reagor Auto Mall, Ltd. in the amount of $ 60,097,393.15.

The bar date for filing additional proofs of claim against the Original Debtors was December 5, 2018; however, the bar date for the New Debtors was March 28, 2019.

Section 7.4 Intercompany Claims.

Due to the intertwined nature of the Debtors’ prepetition business operations, the state of the books and records when BlackBriar assumed its role as CRO, and in an effort to equitably maximize the recovery to creditors, all intercompany claims that the Debtors hold against one another are separately classified under the Plan and will receive no distribution.

ARTICLE VIII SUMMARY OF KEY MATTERS ARISING DURING THE CHAPTER 11 CASES

Section 8.1 Commencement of the Debtors’ Cases. Each Chapter 11 Case was commenced by the filing of a voluntary petition under chapter 11 on the dates identified as each Petition Date. Shortly after these cases were commenced, the Debtors filed several motions incident to the management of the Bankruptcy Cases that were granted by the Court, including the authority

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 52 of 68

Page 53: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 484842-6525-0690.16

to retain certain professionals and the joint administration of the Debtors’ cases under one case number.

Section 8.2 Employment of the Chief Restructuring Officer. The Debtors employed BlackBriar LLC to assist with restoring confidence in consumers, employees, and the community. BlackBriar assist the Debtor with stabilizing operations and acted as an objective intermediary that has pursued a path in the best interest of all parties in interest.

Section 8.3 Auction of Assets Held by Original Debtors. On September 10, 2018, the Original Debtors filed a Motion for Entry of an Order (I) Authorizing and Approving: (A) Bid Procedures; (B) Stalking Horse Bidder and Overbid Protections; and (C) Form and Manner of Notices [Doc. No. 222]. The Original Debtors were successful in procuring a stalking horse bidder and held an auction on the sale of the Original Debtors’ Assets. However, during the sale process, the New Debtors filed for bankruptcy protection. Around the time of the auction, the Debtors were apprised of certain potential investors seeking to reorganize the Debtors as opposed to a sale. After further negotiations and discussion, the Debtors believed that it was in the best interest of the stakeholders and the Estates to pursue a plan of reorganization as opposed to a sale of assets. On November 28, 2018, the Debtors asked that the Court table the sale indefinitely so that the Debtors can pursue the plan of reorganization. The Court granted the Debtors’ request.

Section 8.4 Consumer Protection Efforts. Motion for Order Authorizing and Directing Retail Lenders to Pay Outstanding Tax, Title, and License Fees and Trade-Lien Payoffs. Understanding that innocent consumers were facing difficult circumstances, on October 9, 2018, the Debtors filed a Motion for Order Authorizing and Directing Retail Lenders to Pay Outstanding Tax, Title, and License Fees and Trade-Lien Payoffs (“TT&L Motion”) [Doc. No. 349]. The TT&L Motion required subsequent retail lenders to pay off any outstanding tax, title, and license fees or trade-lien payments so that impacted consumers could then receive their titles and/or registration stickers on their car. The Debtors have engaged in extensive discussion with prior retail lenders, current retail lenders, and consumers in an attempt to reach agreements that resolve the consumer’s tax, title, license fees or trade-lien payoffs. The Debtors have reach multiple agreements with retail lenders and are continuing to engage retail lenders in negotiations and, to date, the Debtors have successfully addressed issues incident to vehicle titles, trade in liens and TT&L for approximately 480 consumers. With that continued cooperation among the retail lenders, the Debtors withdrew the TT&L Motion without prejudice. Under the Restructuring Alternative in the Plan, retail lenders may choose to become Qualified Retail Lenders and take advantage of the TT&L reimbursement provisions.

Section 8.5 Global Negotiations. The Debtors have been proactive in actively negotiating with floor plan lenders, dealers, retail lenders and other parties in interest on myriad complex issues and have had success resolving most substantive motions for relief without consuming the Court’s time. The Debtors have negotiated in good faith with opposing counsel on matters concerning everything from the use of cash collateral to motions to lift the automatic stay, and have

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 53 of 68

Page 54: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 494842-6525-0690.16

made every effort to expend the Debtors’ limited resources judiciously. The Debtors have been successful in reaching agreements and filing agreed orders with the Court in many instances.

ARTICLE IX ACCEPTANCE AND CONFIRMATION OF THE PLAN

Section 9.1 Requirements for Confirmation. At the Confirmation Hearing, the Court will determine whether the provisions of section 1129 of the Bankruptcy Code have been satisfied. Upon the showing that all such requirements are satisfied, and that all other conditions to confirmation set forth in the Plan are met, the Debtors will request that the Bankruptcy Court enter an Order confirming the Plan under §1129(a).

a) Provisions of Section 1129. Section 1129 of the Bankruptcy Code, as applicable here, provides as follows:

(i) The Plan must comply with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code, including section 1123 which specifies the mandatory contents of a plan and section 1122 which requires that Claims and Interests be placed in Classes with “substantially similar” Claims and Interests (section 1129(a)(1)).

(ii) The proponents of the Plan must comply with the applicable provisions of the Code (section 1129(a)(2)).

(iii) The Plan must have been proposed in good faith and not by any means forbidden by law (section 1129(a)(3)).

(iv) Any payment made or to be made by the Debtors, or by a person issuing securities or acquiring property under the Plan, for services or for costs and expenses in or in connection with the Chapter 11 Cases, or in connection with the Plan and incident to the Chapter 11 Cases, must be disclosed to the Court and approved or be subject to the approval of the Court as reasonable (section 1129(a)(4)).

(v) The Debtors must disclose the identity and affiliations of any individual proposed to serve, after Confirmation of the Plan, as a director, officer, or voting trustee of the reorganized debtor, of an affiliate of the Debtors participating in the Plan with the Debtors, or of a successor to the Debtors under the Plan. The appointment to, or continuance in, such office of such individual must be consistent with the interests of the Debtors’ creditors, equity holders, and with public policy. The Debtors must also disclose the identity of any insider that will be employed or retained by the reorganized debtor and the nature of any compensation for such insider (section 1129(a)(5)).

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 54 of 68

Page 55: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 504842-6525-0690.16

(vi) The Plan must meet the “best-interest-of-creditors” test, which requires that each holder of a Claim or Interest of a Class of Claims or Interests that is impaired under the Plan either accept the Plan or receive or retain under the Plan on account of such Claim or Interest property of a value as of the Effective Date of the Plan, that is not less than the amount that such holder would receive or retain if the Debtors were liquidated on such date under chapter 7 of the Code. If the holders of a Class of Secured Claims make an election under section 1111(b) of the Code, each holder of a Claim in such electing Class must receive or retain under the Plan on account of its Claim property of a value, as of the Effective Date of the Plan, that is not less than the value of its interest in the Debtors’ interest in the property that secures its Claim (section 1129(a)(7)). To calculate what non-accepting holders would receive if the Debtors were liquidated under chapter 7, the Court must determine the dollar amount that would be generated upon disposition of the Debtors’ assets and reduce such amount by the costs of liquidation. Such costs would include the fees of a Trustee (as well as those of counsel and other professionals) and all expenses of sale.

(vii) Each Class of Claims or Interests must either accept the Plan or not be impaired under the Plan (section 1129(a)(8)). Alternatively, as discussed herein, the Plan may be confirmed over the dissent of a Class of Claims or Interests if the “cramdown” requirements of section 1129(b) of the Bankruptcy Code are met.

(viii) Except to the extent that the holder of a particular Claim has agreed to a different treatment of such Claim, the Plan must provide that holders of Administrative Claims and Priority Claims (other than tax claims) will be paid in full in cash on the Effective Date of the Plan, and that holders of priority tax Claims will receive on account of such Claims deferred cash payments, over a period not exceeding six (6) years after the date of assessment of such tax, of a value, as of the Effective Date of the Plan, equal to the Allowed amount of such Claim (section 1129(a)(9)).

(ix) At least one impaired Class must accept the Plan, determined without including the acceptance of the Plan by any insider holding a Claim of such Class (section 1129(a)(10)).

(x) The Plan must be “feasible”. In other words, it cannot be likely that confirmation of the Plan will be followed by the liquidation, or the need for further financial reorganization, of

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 55 of 68

Page 56: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 514842-6525-0690.16

the Debtors or any successor to the Debtors under the Plan, unless such liquidation is proposed in the Plan (section 1129(a)(11)).

(xi) All fees required to be paid under the Bankruptcy Code have been paid or the Plan provides for such payment on its Effective Date (section 1129(a)(12)).

b) The Plan Meets All of the Requirements for Confirmation. The Debtors believe that the Plan satisfies all statutory requirements of chapter 11 of the Code and should be confirmed. More specifically:

(i) The Plan complies with all of the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code;

(ii) The Debtors have complied with the Bankruptcy Code and have proposed the Plan in good faith;

(iii) All disclosure requirements concerning payments made or to be made for services rendered in connection with the Chapter 11 Cases or the Plan have been, or will be met prior to or at the Confirmation Hearing; and

(iv) Administrative Claims, Priority Claims, and fees required to be paid under the Code are appropriately treated under the Plan.

c) The Plan is Feasible: Restructuring Alternative: Furthermore, the Plan is feasible. The Bankruptcy Code requires that, as a condition to Confirmation of a plan, the Court find that Confirmation is not likely to be followed by a liquidation or a need for further financial reorganization except as proposed in that plan. The Debtors believe the Plan is feasible as it, under the Restructuring Alternative, provides for payment of creditors in accordance with the waterfall provisions of the Code, and for the continuation of the Debtors’ business pursuant to the Post-Confirmation Business Plan. Initially, the Plan provides for the payment in full of all Allowed Administrative Claims and Priority Claims by the Reorganized Debtors on or promptly after the Effective Date except for Priority Tax Claims which will be paid over time in accordance with the Bankruptcy Code. Next, Confirmation of the Plan shall effect the formation of the Creditors Trust. The Creditors’ Trust Assets shall consist of (a) under the Restructuring Alternative, 10% of the New Equity of the Reorganized Debtors that will be issued to the Creditors Trust pursuant to a Restructuring under this Plan for the express benefit of creditors holding Allowed Class 11 Claims against the Debtors, subject to the New Equity Redemption Right, and (b) under the Liquidation Alternative, all Causes of Action and the Litigation Proceeds for the express benefit of creditors holding Allowed Class 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15 Claims.

With regard to the Reorganized Debtors’ future business operations, the Post-Confirmation Business Plan, which consists of the three year projections of the income and expenses of the Debtors, including payroll, professional fees, operational

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 56 of 68

Page 57: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 524842-6525-0690.16

expenses, and payments due to Allowed Administrative Claims, Priority Tax Claims, and Priority Non-Tax Claims pursuant to the Plan, is attached as Exhibit B. The Post-Confirmation Business Plan includes various alternative business models on which the Restructuring Alternative may be achieved, labeled as B-1, B-2, and B-3. Upon confirmation of the Plan, the Dealerships will be recapitalized by the $13 million New Equity Infusion from the Plan Sponsor, the Debtors will benefit from the proven operational expertise of the Fin Ewing Group including Mr. Ron Blaylock as Chief Executive Officer, and will be well-positioned to accomplish their long-term business and financial goals as outlined in the Plan.20 The Debtors believe that the projections set forth in the Post-Confirmation Business Plan are conservative and achievable; the Plan is feasible.

d) The Plan is Feasible: Liquidating Alternative: If the Restructuring Alternative is unsuccessful, the Plan will instead go effective via the orderly and controlled disposition of all Assets by the Creditors Trustee under the Liquidation Alternative with Dennis Faulkner of Lain, Faulkner & Co. LLC as the proposed Creditors Trustee. To address an objection raised by a creditor regarding the need to engage a new and independent trustee, the Debtors suggested Mr. Faulkner and the objecting creditor agreed. Mr. Faulkner has served as a post-confirmation plan trustee in numerous large and complex Chapter 11 cases, and is well-qualified for this role. Mr. Faulkner will be assisted as necessary by Lyndon James, a principal of BlackBriar Advisors, LLC. BlackBriar is the duly employed Chief Restructuring Officer of the Debtors since the inception of these cases; as such, BlackBriar and Mr. James have irreplaceable institutional knowledge compared to any chapter 7 trustee. With Mr. James’s assistance and his own significant experience, Mr. Faulkner will be best positioned to oversee an orderly liquidation of assets that will result in the highest and best return to all creditors and parties in interest. In addition, Mr. Faulkner will not earn fees for such liquidation in excess of the fees that would have been earned by a chapter 7 trustee.

ARTICLE X LIQUIDATION ANALYSIS

The Debtors believe that the Plan, which either provides for the continued business operations of the Debtors, or a controlled orderly liquidation of assets, affords creditors the potential for the greatest realization from the Debtors’ assets, and, therefore, is in the best interests of creditors. As noted above, the value of the Debtors is in their Dealer Agreements, proven commitment to Lubbock and surrounding towns in West Texas, and – post-confirmation - the proven operational experience and expertise of the Fin Ewing Group including Mr. Ron Blaylock. If the Plan goes effective pursuant to the Restructuring Alternative, then maintaining the Debtors’ deep-seated commitment to the community of Lubbock and continuity of business operations pursuant to the Dealer Agreements will

20 Mr. Blaylock’s Executive Biography is attached as Exhibit G. The Post-Confirmation Business Plan includes all proposed compensation to Mr. Blaylock and the Fin Ewing Group for consulting services. If the proposed compensation is increased in a material way, the Debtors will include that increase in the Plan Supplement Documents. Exhibit G complies with §1129(a)(5)(A)(i), but neither Mr. Blaylock nor anyone currently employed with the Fin Ewing Group is an insider of the Debtors implicating §1129(a)(5)(B).

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 57 of 68

Page 58: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 534842-6525-0690.16

be the focus of the Debtors’ post-confirmation business, all as set forth in the Restructuring Alternative of the Plan and the Post-Confirmation Business Plan.

If the Plan is instead confirmed via the Liquidation Alternative, same is still preferable to a chaotic Chapter 7. As stated above, the proposed Trustee, Mr. Faulkner as assisted by Mr. James, will accomplish the dual goals to ensure a fresh look by an independent third party and simultaneously to preserve the irreplaceable institutional knowledge compared to a Chapter 7 trustee. To address any concerns regarding the comparative cost of a Creditors Trustee, the compensation to be paid to the Creditors Trustee under the Liquidation Alternative will not exceed the compensation that would be paid to a Chapter 7 trustee if the Chapter 11 Cases were converted to administration under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code. For that reason and others set forth below and to be explained at the Confirmation hearing, the Debtors believe that a controlled liquidation under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code through the Liquidation Alternative will generate more value to all general unsecured creditotrs.

The key benefits to confirmation of the Plan with Mr. Faulkner as Creditors Trustee with BlackBriar’s assistance as opposed to conversion include: BlackBriar has already invested significant time and resources investigation the Debtors’ Claims and Causes of Action (including Chapter 5 Causes of Action), BlackBriar is best positioned to oversee the continued redress of TT&L issues for the benefit of consumers, and BlackBriar is familiar with the Debtors’ dealerships, books and records and business operations. By contrast, a Chapter 7 trustee likely would not have the wide-ranging experience that Mr. Faulkner has in large and complex Chapter 11 cases, would incur significant cost and delay in “catching up” on all aspects of the Debtors and the Causes of Action with which BlackBriar is already well-versed, and liquidation of the remaining inventory vehicles by a Chapter 7 trustee at a “fire sale” would yield little comparative value to the Debtors’ secured lenders and no value for General Unsecured Creditors. Relatedly and to that point, the auction of the new and used vehicles currently in the Debtors’ possession would not raise nearly enough funds necessary to pay off their respective floor plan lenders that claim superior liens – Ford Credit, GM Financial, First Capital Bank and FB&T. A liquidation analysis depicting the likely results of a fire-sale liquidation is attached hereto as Exhibit “C.”

In a Chapter 7 liquidation scenario, a trustee would be appointed to administer the Estates, to resolve pending controversies against the Debtors and claims of the Estates against other parties, and to make distribution to Creditors. If the Cases were converted to cases under Chapter 7, significant additional Administrative Expenses would be incurred, and any distributions to holders of Claims would be substantially delayed and, in all likelihood, reduced as compared to the anticipated results of Confirmation of the Plan. A Chapter 7 trustee would be entitled to compensation in accordance with the scale set forth in § 326 of the Bankruptcy Code, and might also seek to retain new professionals, including attorneys and accountants, in order to resolve any disputed Claims and possibly to pursue claims of the Estates against other parties. There is a strong probability that such Chapter 7 trustee would not possess any particular knowledge of the Debtors’ industry. The trustee and any such new professionals retained by the trustee would need to expend time familiarizing themselves with the Debtors’ operations specifically and the industry generally, resulting in a duplication of effort, increased expense, and delay in payment to Creditors. Under the Bankruptcy Rules, a new bar date for the filing of proofs of claim would have to be set, and additional Claims against the Estates that will soon be time-barred (because they were not filed before the applicable bar dates set in the Cases) could be asserted.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 58 of 68

Page 59: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 544842-6525-0690.16

Further, Ford Credit objects to the Liquidating Alternative. The Debtors believe that objection is a confirmation objection. The Debtors also believe that Ford Credit opposes the Liquidating Alternative because it wants to control any liquidation through the election of a chapter 7 trustee. The Debtors do not believe that control over the liquidation or trustee election by any potential litigation target is proper or in the best interests of the Estates, given Ford Credit’s or other party’s potential litigation risk under any liquidation scenario. Further, a trustee-election fight will be expensive, which gives Ford Credit or other potential litigation target an advantage over the Estates. For a lot of reasons, including that the Creditor Trustee (with the assistance of BlackBriar) will be free from any influence by a potential litigation target and will not earn more than a chapter 7 trustee would in liquidation through chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code, the Debtors believe that a controlled liquidation under the Liquidating Alternative is in the best interests of the Estates.

THE DEBTORS BELIEVE THAT CONFIRMATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLAN IS PREFERABLE TO ANY OF THE ALTERNATIVES DESCRIBED HEREIN BECAUSE IT SHOULD PROVIDE GREATER RECOVERIES THAN THOSE AVAILABLE IN A CHAPTER 7 LIQUIDATION TO THE HOLDERS OF SECURED AND UNSECURED CLAIMS WHO WOULD LIKELY RECEIVE LESS IN A CHAPTER 7 LIQUIDATION. IN ADDITION, OTHER ALTERNATIVES WOULD INVOLVE DELAY, UNCERTAINTY, AND SUBSTANTIAL ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS.

ARTICLE XI VOTING PROCEDURES

ACCEPTANCE OR REJECTION OF THE PLAN WILL BE DETERMINED, PURSUANT TO THE BANKRUPTCY CODE, BASED UPON THE ALLOWED CLAIMS AND ALLOWED INTERESTS THAT ACTUALLY VOTE ON THE PLAN. THEREFORE, IT IS IMPORTANT THAT CLAIMANTS EXERCISE THEIR RIGHT TO VOTE TO ACCEPT OR REJECT THE PLAN.

Section 11.1 Classes Entitled to Vote on the Plan. All members of Impaired Classes who hold Allowed Claims are entitled to vote to accept or reject the Plan. Section 1124 of the Bankruptcy Code generally provides that a class of claims or interests is considered to be impaired under a plan unless the plan does not alter the legal, equitable, and contractual rights of the holders of such claims or interest. For purposes of Plan solicitation, Holders of Allowed Claims in Class 1 are Unimpaired; therefore, they are presumed to accept the Plan. Holders of Claims in Classes 1A, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15 are Impaired under the Plan; therefore, they are entitled to vote to accept or reject the Plan. Holders of Allowed Claims in Class 15 will receive no Distributions under the Plan on account of said Claims if the Plan is Confirmed under the Restructuring Alternative, and Holders of Allowed Claims in Class 16 and 17 and Interests in Class 18 are Impaired and will receive no Distributions under the Plan on account of said Claims or Interests; therefore, Classes 16, 17 and 18 are presumed to reject the Plan under § 1126(g) of the Bankruptcy Code.

Section 11.2 Persons Entitled to Vote on the Plan. Only holders of Allowed Claims and holders of Disputed Claims which have been temporarily allowed for voting purposes are entitled to vote on the Plan. For purposes of the Plan, an Allowed Claim is (i) a Claim against or Interest in a Debtor, proof of which, if filed on or before the Bar Date, which is not a Disputed Claim or Disputed Interest, (ii) if no proof of claim or interest was so filed, a Claim against or Interest in a Debtor that

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 59 of 68

Page 60: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 554842-6525-0690.16

has been or hereafter is listed by a Debtor in the Schedules as liquidated in amount and not disputed or contingent, or (iii) a Claim or Interest allowed hereunder or by Final Order. An Allowed Claim or Allowed Interest does not include any Claim or Interest or portion thereof which is a Disallowed Claim or Disallowed Interest which has been subsequently withdrawn, disallowed, released or waived by the holder thereof, by this Plan, or pursuant to Final Order. Unless otherwise specifically provided in the Plan, an Allowed Claim or Allowed Interest shall not include any amount for punitive damages or penalties. Therefore, although the holders of Disputed Claims will receive ballots, these votes will not be counted unless such Claims become Allowed Claims as provided under the Plan or are temporarily allowed for voting purposes by the Court.

THE CLAIMS IN CLASSES 1A, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 AND 15 UNDER THE PLAN ARE IMPAIRED AND ARE ENTITLED TO VOTE WITH RESPECT TO ACCEPTANCE OR REJECTION OF THE PLAN. HOLDERS OF ALLOWED CLAIMS IN CLASS 15 WILL RECEIVE NO DISTRIBUTIONS UNDER THE PLAN ON ACCOUNT OF SAID CLAIMS IF THE PLAN IS CONFIRMED UNDER THE RESTRUCTURING ALTERNATIVE, AND HOLDERS OF ALLOWED CLAIMS IN CLASS 16 AND 17 AND INTERESTS IN CLASS 18 ARE IMPAIRED AND WILL RECEIVE NO DISTRIBUTIONS UNDER THE PLAN ON ACCOUNT OF SAID CLAIMS OR INTERESTS; THEREFORE, THEY ARE PRESUMED TO REJECT THE PLAN. INTERESTS IN CLASS 18 WILL BE EXTINGUISHED.

Section 11.3 Vote Required for Class Acceptance. During the Confirmation Hearing, the Bankruptcy Court will determine whether the Classes voting on the Plan have accepted the Plan by determining whether sufficient acceptances have been received from the holders of Allowed Claims actually voting in such Classes. A Class of Claims will be determined to have accepted the Plan if the holders of Allowed Claims in the Class casting votes in favor of the Plan (i) hold at least two-thirds of the total amount of the Allowed Claims of the holders in such Class who actually vote and (ii) constitute more than one-half in number of holders of the Allowed Claims in such Class who actually vote on the Plan.

As a condition to Confirmation, the Bankruptcy Code requires that each impaired Class of Claims or Interests accept the Plan, subject to the “cramdown” exception of §1129(b) described herein. To effectuate the §1129(b) exception, at least one impaired Class of Claims must accept the Plan.

Section 11.4 Accepting Vote Is a Vote For Confirmation Under Either Alternative.

As stated throughout this Disclosure Statement, the Debtors believe that the Plan is confirmable under either the Restructuring or Liquidation Alternative. A vote to accept the Plan is a vote in favor of Confirmation regardless of under which alternative the Plan ultimately proceeds to an Effective Date. If the Debtors are unable to go “effective” on the Restructuring Alternative, they will notify the Court and go “effective” on the Liquidation Alternative.

Section 11.6 Voting Instructions.

a) Ballots and Voting. Holders of Allowed Claims entitled to vote on the Plan have been sent a Ballot, together with instructions for voting, with this Disclosure Statement. Claimants should read the Ballot carefully and follow the

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 60 of 68

Page 61: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 564842-6525-0690.16

instructions contained therein. In voting for or against the Plan, please use only the Ballot that accompanies this Disclosure Statement.

EACH CREDITOR WILL RECEIVE A SINGLE BALLOT ONLY. IF YOU HAVE MORE THAN ONE CLAIM AGAINST ONE OF THE DEBTORS, OR YOU HAVE CLAIMS AGAINST MORE THAN ONE DEBTOR, YOU MAY REPRODUCE THIS BALLOT AS MANY TIMES AS NECESSARY TO PROPERLY VOTE YOUR CLAIMS. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING THE BALLOT OR VOTING PROCEDURES, YOU SHOULD CONTACT COUNSEL FOR THE DEBTORS:

C. ASHLEY ELLIS FOLEY GARDERE, FOLEY & LARDNER LLP

2021 MCKINNEY AVENUE, SUITE 1600 DALLAS, TX 75201

(214) 999-3000 [email protected]

b) Returning Ballots and Voting Deadline. You should complete and sign each Ballot that you receive and return it either via email to [email protected] or in the pre-addressed envelope enclosed with each Ballot to the counsel for the Debtor in the self-addressed envelope provided, by the Voting Deadline.

THE VOTING DEADLINE IS 4:00 P.M., CENTRAL STANDARD TIME, ON [____________, 2019]. TO BE COUNTED, BALLOTS MUST BE ACTUALLY RECEIVED BY COUNSEL FOR THE DEBTOR VIA EMAIL OR VIA U.S. MAIL OR OTHER COURIER ON OR BEFORE 4:00 P.M., CENTRAL STANDARD TIME, ON THE VOTING DEADLINE AT THE ADDRESS SET FORTH IN THE BALLOT INSTRUCTIONS WHICH ACCOMPANY THE ENCLOSED BALLOT. EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT ALLOWED BY THE BANKRUPTCY COURT, BALLOTS RECEIVED AFTER THE VOTING DEADLINE MAY NOT BE ACCEPTED OR USED IN CONNECTION WITH THE DEBTORS’ REQUEST FOR CONFIRMATION OF THE PLAN OR ANY MODIFICATION THEREOF.

c) Incomplete or Irregular Ballots. Ballots which fail to designate the Class to which they apply shall be counted in the appropriate Class as determined by the Debtors, subject only to contrary determinations by the Bankruptcy Court.

d) Changing Votes. Bankruptcy Rule 3018(a) permits a Claimant, for cause, to move the Bankruptcy Court to permit such claimant to change or withdraw its acceptance or rejection of a plan of reorganization.

Section 11.7 Disputed and Unliquidated Claims. Disputed Claims are not entitled to vote to accept or reject the Plan. If you are the holder of a Disputed Claim, you may ask the Bankruptcy

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 61 of 68

Page 62: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 574842-6525-0690.16

Court pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 3018 to have your Claim temporarily Allowed for the purpose of voting.

Section 11.8 Possible Reclassification of Creditors and Interest Holders. The Debtors are required pursuant to §1122 of the Bankruptcy Code to place Claims and Interests into Classes that contain substantially similar Claims or Interests. While the Debtors believe that all Claims and Interests are classified in the Plan in compliance with §1122, it is possible that a Claimant or Interest holder may challenge the classification of its Claim or Interest. If the Debtors are required to reclassify any Claims or Interests of any Claimants or Interest holders under the Plan, the Debtors, to the extent permitted by the Bankruptcy Court, intend to continue to use the acceptances received from such Claimants or Interest holders pursuant to the solicitation of acceptances using this Disclosure Statement for the purpose of obtaining the approval of the Class or Classes of which such Claimants or Interest holders are ultimately deemed to be a member. Any reclassification of Claimants or Interest holders should affect the Class in which such Claimants or Interest holders were initially a member, or any other Class under the Plan, by changing the composition of such Class and the required vote thereof for approval of the Plan.

ARTICLE XII CRAMDOWN OR MODIFICATION OF THE PLAN

Section 12.1 “Cramdown:” Request for Relief under Section 1129(b). If any Impaired Class of Claims does not accept the Plan in accordance with § 1129(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Debtors shall request the Bankruptcy Court to confirm the Plan in accordance with the provisions of § 1129(b) of the Bankruptcy Code as to that non-accepting Impaired Class.

The Court may confirm a plan, even if it is not accepted by all impaired Classes, if a plan has been accepted by at least one impaired Class of Claims and the plan meets the “cramdown” provisions set forth in § 1129(b) of the Code. The “cramdown” provisions require that the Court find that a plan “does not discriminate unfairly” and is “fair and equitable” with respect to each non-accepting impaired Class. In the event that all impaired Classes do not vote to accept the Plan, the Debtors will request that the Bankruptcy Court nonetheless confirm the Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 1129(b) of the Code.

The Court may find that the Plan is “fair and equitable” with respect to a Class of non-accepting impaired Interests only if (a) the holder of an Interest will receive or retain under the Plan property of a value as of the Plan’s Effective Date equal to the greatest of any fixed liquidation preference or redemption price or the value of such Interest or (b) the holder of any Interest that is junior to such Interest will not receive or retain any property under the Plan.

The Court may find that the Plan is “fair and equitable” with respect to a Class of non-accepting impaired Unsecured Claims only if (a) each impaired unsecured Creditor receives or retains under the Plan property of a value as of the Effective Date of such Plan equal to the amount of its Allowed Claim, or (b) the holder of any Claim or Interest that is junior to the Claims of the dissenting Class will not receive or retain any property under the Plan.

The Court may find that the Plan is “fair and equitable” with respect to a Class of non-accepting Secured Claims, only if, under the Plan, (a) the holder of each Secured Claim in such Class retains such holder’s lien and receives deferred cash payments totaling at least the Allowed amount of

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 62 of 68

Page 63: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 584842-6525-0690.16

such Secured Claim and having a value, as of the Effective Date of the Plan, equal to or in excess of the value of such holder’s interest in the estate’s interest in the collateral for the Secured Claim, (b) the collateral for such Secured Claim is sold, the lien securing such Claims attached to the proceeds, and such liens on proceeds are afforded the treatment described under clause (a) or (c) of this sentence, or (c) the holders of such Secured Claims realize the “indubitable equivalent” of their claims.

If all of the provisions of section 1129 are met, the Court may enter an order confirming the Plan.

Section 12.2 The Plan Meets the “Best-Interest-of-Creditors” Test. The “best interest of creditors” test requires that the Court find that the Plan provides to each non-accepting holder of a Claim or Interest treated under the Plan a recovery which has a present value at least equal to the present value of the distribution that such person would receive from the Debtor if the Debtor were liquidated under Chapter 7 of the Code. An analysis depicting the likely recoveries and effect on Creditors in the event of a liquidation under Chapter 7 of the Code, including references to the likely increase in administrative expenses, is contained on Exhibit C.

Section 12.3 The Plan Meets the Cramdown Standard with Respect to Any Impaired Class of Claims Rejecting the Plan. The Plan satisfies the provisions for cramdown under §1129(b)(2) of the Code. Secured Creditors are, at a minimum, receiving (i) payment of their Allowed Secured Claim in full in cash, including interest, if applicable, as required under § 506(b) of the Bankruptcy Code; (ii) delivery of the Collateral securing their Allowed Secured Claim; or (iii) issuance of a restructured note with a present value equal to the amount of the value of their Collateral with interest, all in accordance with §1129(b)(2)(A). Interest Holders are not receiving or retaining any property under the Plan on account of their Interests, thus the Plan satisfies §1129(b)(2)(B)(ii) should a Class of Unsecured Claims reject the Plan. In the event that an impaired Class rejects the Plan, the Plan shall be deemed a motion for cramdown of such Class under §1129(b)(2) of the Code.

Section 12.4 Modification or Revocation of the Plan; Severability. Subject to the restrictions on modifications set forth in §1127 of the Bankruptcy Code and any applicable notice requirements, the Debtors reserve the right to alter, amend or modify the Plan before its substantial consummation. The Debtors also reserve the right to withdraw the Plan prior to the Confirmation Date. If the Debtors withdraw the Plan, or if Confirmation does not occur, then the Plan shall be null and void in all respects, and nothing contained in the Plan will prejudice in any manner the rights of the Debtors.

If, prior to Confirmation, any term or provision of the Plan is held by the Bankruptcy Court to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the Bankruptcy Court, at the request of the Debtors, has the power to alter and interpret such term or provision to make it valid or enforceable to the maximum extent practicable, consistent with the original purpose of the term or provision held to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, and such term or provision will then be applicable as altered or interpreted. Notwithstanding any such holding, alteration, or interpretation, the remainder of the terms and provisions of the Plan will remain in full force and effect and will in no way be affected, impaired or invalidated by such holding, alteration, or interpretation.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 63 of 68

Page 64: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 594842-6525-0690.16

ARTICLE XIII RISK FACTORS

Section 13.1 Factors Relating to Chapter 11 and Restructuring via the Plan. The following is intended as a summary of certain risks associated with the Plan, but is not exhaustive and must be supplemented by the analysis and evaluation of the Plan and this Disclosure Statement made by each Claimant as a whole in consultation with such Claimant’s own advisors. In the event of a Restructuring, it is unlikely, although possible, that the Reorganized Debtors will not be able to procure necessary space for the dealerships or floor plan financing, will be unable to procure the services of an adequate number of new or returning employees, and/or will face challenges restoring systems and controls to sell a high volume of cars, that the parties to the Dealer Agreements will seek termination despite Confirmation, that consumers may be resistant to doing business with the Reorganized Debtors due to negative press coverage and/or unfavorable attitudes toward the Debtors among those in the Lubbock community, or the projections set forth in the Post-Confirmation Business Plan will not be met. The fact remains, however, that in order for General Unsecured Creditors to be paid, and for Ford Credit, GM Financial, First Capital Bank or FB&T, to maximize recovery for the Debtors’ business operations must continue post-confirmation. The value of the Debtors’ estates is inexorably tied to the value that may be realized from continued/revived operations of the Dealerships at the Locations, whether the Plan is confirmed or not. In this regard, the Debtors’ proposed Restructuring is dependent on the existence of valid dealer license(s) and franchise agreement(s) with what is known in the industry as “OEMs,” which stands for Original Equipment Manufacturers. As relevant here, the OEMs include Ford Motor, General Motors, Mitsubishi and Gulf States Toyota. At this time, disputes exist with each of OEM about the Debtors’ ability to assume the respective franchise agreements pursuant to the Bankruptcy Code. Therefore, the Post-Confirmation Business Model attached as Exhibit B includes various alternative business models on which the Restructuring Alternative may be achieved, labeled as B-1, B-2, and B-3. As indicated thereon, model B-1 contemplates reorganized operations under franchise agreements with all Dealerships; model B-2 contemplates reorganized operations under franchise agreements with Ford, Toyota, and Mitsubishi; and model B-3 contemplates reorganized operations under franchise agreements with Ford and Mitsubishi.

Ford Credit has approved Mr. Dykes’s involvement, including ownership, in the Reorganized Debtors. At this time, no OEM has approved Mr. Dykes’s future involvement in the Reorganized Debtors. The Debtors believe that, unless they reach agreement with the OEMs prior to Confirmation, the issue of Mr. Dykes’s future involvement in the Reorganized Debtors will be resolved by the Plan Sponsor or the Court at or after Confirmation. At the request of the OEMs, the Debtors make, but do not agree with the representations stated, the following additional disclosures:

Statement by Toyota: The Toyota Dealer Agreement with Reagor-Dykes Plainview, LP d/b/a Reagor-Dykes Toyota is a twenty-four month term agreement. That agreement was set to expire on November 8, 2017. Gulf States Toyota (“GST”) issued two six month extensions. The second extension letter set November 8, 2018 as the expiration date. On October 17, 2018, GST and Reagor-Dykes Toyota agreed to the entry of that certain Agreed Order Granting Gulf States Toyota, Inc.’s Motion for Relief From The Automatic Stay [Docket No. 401] pursuant to which. GST sent a non-renewal notice on December 5, 2018. GST asserts that under Chapter 2301 of the Texas Occupations Code, Reagor-Dykes Toyota had until February 8, 2019 to file a protest with the Texas Department of Motor Vehicles to challenge the non-renewal of its Toyota Dealer Agreement. In January 2019,

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 64 of 68

Page 65: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 604842-6525-0690.16

GST and Reagor-Dykes Toyota agreed to the entry of that certain Agreed Order Granting Gulf States Toyota, Inc.’s Motion for Relief From the Automatic Stay [Docket No. 864] pursuant to which GST sent a separate notice to terminate the Toyota Dealer Agreement on fifteen days’ notice, based on GST’s allegations that the dealership had failed to conduct customary sales and service operations for seven consecutive business days on January 24, 2019. Reagor-Dykes Toyota notified the Texas Department of Motor Vehicles that it protested GST’s January 24, 2019 termination notice. GST and Reagor-Dykes Toyota have engaged in a statutorily-required mediation before the Texas Department of Motor Vehicles (MVD Docket No. 19-0020-LIC; Reagor-Dykes Plainview LP dba Reagor-Dykes Toyota, Protestant v. Gulf States Toyota, Inc., Respondent). GST informed Reagor-Dykes Toyota at the mediation that it intends to pursue non-renewal and/or termination to its conclusion. Likewise, Reagor-Dykes Toyota informed GST at the mediation that it intends to pursue assumption and assignment of the Toyota Dealer Agreement in connection with confirmation of the Plan. Reagor-Dykes Toyota disputes both the non-renewal and termination notices and reserves all rights and remedies that may be afforded by 11 U.S.C. §108 and all other applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code vis a vis the Toyota Dealer Agreement and disputes with GST; GST likewise reserves all rights and remedies against Reagor-Dykes Toyota incident to same.

Statement by General Motors: GM asserts that the dealerships at Floydada and at Snyder have been terminated. GM obtained a prior order from this Court lifting the automatic stay to permit GM to take action before the Texas Department of Motor Vehicles related to the franchises. By letters dated April 29, 2019 as to Snyder and April 11, 2019 as to Floydada, the Texas Department of Motor Vehicles confirmed the termination of the applicable Dealer Sales and Services Agreements, but the Debtors intend to contest such termination pursuant to all applicable bankruptcy and non-bankruptcy law. GM further maintains that neither dealership is conducting operations, and the lender to the Debtor affiliate which owned these properties foreclosed on them and has placed them for sale with a broker. The Debtors dispute all non-renewal/termination notices and reserves all rights and remedies that may be afforded by 11 U.S.C. §108 and all other applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code vis a vis the Dealer Sales and Services Agreements and disputes with GM; GM likewise reserves all rights and remedies against the Debtors incident to same.

Discussions with the OEMs are ongoing. If no agreement is reached with the OEMs, the Debtors will request the Court to decide the core issues of assumption and assignment of the franchise agreements as executory contracts pursuant to §365 of the Bankruptcy Code. The Debtors further believe that the Business Plans attached as Exhibit B are reasonable, feasible and achievable. If the Plan is confirmed, the Debtors believe that they will achieve at the least the projections outlined in Exhibit B, and the risk that the effective Business Plan will not be realized is well within the range of acceptable risk for the hypothetical investor, given the projected return.

Section 13.2 Insufficient Acceptances. The Plan may not be confirmed without sufficient accepting votes. Each impaired Class of Claims and Interests receiving a distribution under the Plan is given the opportunity to vote to accept or reject the Plan. The Plan will be accepted by a Class of impaired Claims if the Plan is accepted by Claimants in such Class actually voting on the Plan who hold at least two-thirds (2/3) in amount and more than one-half (1/2) in number of the total Allowed Claims of that Class which actually vote. The Plan will be accepted by a Class of impaired Interests if it is accepted by holders of Interests in such Class actually voting on the Plan who hold at leasttwo-thirds (2/3) in amount of the total Allowed Interests of the Class which actually vote. However, an Interest Holder is deemed to have rejected the Plan and is therefore not entitled to vote on the

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 65 of 68

Page 66: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 614842-6525-0690.16

Plan. Only those members of a Class who vote to accept or reject the Plan will be counted for voting purposes. If any impaired Class of Claims under the Plan fails to provide acceptance levels sufficient to meet the minimum Class vote requirements but at least one impaired Class of Claims accepts the Plan, then, subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Debtors intend to request confirmation of the Plan under Section 1129(b) of the Bankruptcy Code.

Section 13.3 Lack of Material Recoveries on the Causes of Action. There is a risk that the litigation intended to be brought by the Creditors’ Trust or the Creditors Trust, as the case may be, under the Plan will not yield any material net recoveries for the payment of creditors. Risk is an inescapable part of any litigation, and exists independent of Chapter 11 and the Plan. The Debtors cannot guarantee that the net proceeds from the Causes of Action will exceed a certain amount under either a Restructuring or Liquidation.

ARTICLE XIV CERTAIN FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE PLAN

The following discussion summarizes certain possible federal income tax consequences of the Plan to the Debtors, and to the holders of Claims and Interests. It is based on the Bankruptcy Code, Treasury Regulations, and administrative and judicial interpretations thereof that are now in effect, but which could change, even retroactively, at any time. This disclosure is provided for informational purposes only. Moreover, this Disclosure Statement summarizes only certain of the federal income-tax consequences associated with the Plan’s confirmation and implementation. This discussion does not address all aspects of federal, state, and local tax laws that could impact the various classes of Claimants, the holders of Interests or the Debtors.

NO RULING HAS BEEN SOUGHT OR OBTAINED FROM THE IRS WITH RESPECT TO ANY OF THE TAX ASPECTS OF THE PLAN AND NO OPINION OF COUNSEL HAS BEEN OBTAINED BY THE DEBTORS WITH RESPECT THERETO. NO REPRESENTATIONS OR ASSURANCES ARE BEING MADE WITH RESPECT TO THE FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES AS DESCRIBED HEREIN. CERTAIN TYPES OF CLAIMANTS AND INTEREST HOLDERS MAY BE SUBJECT TO SPECIAL RULES NOT ADDRESSED IN THIS SUMMARY OF FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES. FURTHER, STATE, LOCAL, OR FOREIGN TAX CONSIDERATIONS MAY APPLY TO A HOLDER OF A CLAIM OR INTEREST WHICH ARE NOT ADDRESSED HEREIN. BECAUSE THE TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE PLAN ARE COMPLEX AND MAY VARY BASED ON INDIVIDUAL CIRCUMSTANCES, EACH HOLDER OF A CLAIM OR INTEREST AFFECTED BY THE PLAN MUST CONSULT, AND RELY UPON, HIS OR HER OWN TAX ADVISOR REGARDING THE SPECIFIC TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE PLAN WITH RESPECT TO THAT HOLDER’S CLAIM OR INTEREST. THIS INFORMATION MAY NOT BE USED OR QUOTED IN WHOLE OR IN PART IN CONNECTION WITH THE OFFERING FOR SALE OF SECURITIES.

Under the IRC, a taxpayer generally must include in gross income the amount of any discharge of indebtedness income realized during the taxable year. A Creditor who receives cash or other consideration in satisfaction of any Claim may recognize ordinary income. The impact of such ordinary income, as well as the tax year for which the income shall be recognized, shall depend upon

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 66 of 68

Page 67: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 624842-6525-0690.16

the individual circumstances of each Claimant, including the nature and manner of organization of the Claimant, the applicable tax bracket for the Claimant, and the taxable year of the Claimant. Each Creditor is urged to consult with its tax advisor regarding the tax implications of any payments or distributions under the Plan.

In general, the principal federal income tax consequences of the Plan to holders of Claims will be (a) recognition of loss or a bad debt deduction to the extent that the total payments received under the Plan with respect to the Claim are less than the adjusted basis of the holder in such Claim, or (b) recognition of taxable income by the holder of the Claim to the extent of the excess of the amount of any payments made under the Plan in respect of the Claim over the holder’s adjusted basis therein.

Common examples of holders of Claims who may recognize taxable income upon receipt of payments under the Plan include (a) former employees with Claims for services rendered while serving as employees of a Debtor, (b) trade creditors whose Claims represent an item not previously reported in income (including Claims for lost income upon rejection of leases or other contracts with a Debtor), (c) holders of Claims who had previously claimed a bad debt deduction with respect to their Claims in excess of their ultimate economic loss, and (d) holders of Claims that include amounts of pre-petition interest that had not previously been reported in income. Common examples of Claims who may recognize a loss or deduction for tax purposes as a result of implementation of the Plan, provided that such holders are not paid in full, include holders of Claims that arose out of cash actually loaned or advanced to a Debtor, and holders of Claims consisting of items that were previously included in income of such holders on the accrual method of accounting, to the extent, in both cases, that the economic loss to such holders has not been allowed as a tax deduction in a prior year.

The amount and character or any resulting income or loss recognized for federal income tax consequences to a holder of any Claim as a result of implementation of the Plan will, however, depend on many factors. The most significant of these factors include (a) the nature and origin of the Claim, (b) whether the holder is a corporation (c) the extent to which the Plan provides for payment of the particular Claim, (d) the extent to which any payment made is allocable to pre-petition interest which is part of such Claim, and (e) the prior tax reporting positions taken by the holder with respect to the item that constitutes the Claim. As to the last factor, relevant tax reporting positions include whether the holder had to report under its method of accounting any portion of the Claim (including accrued and unpaid interest) as income prior to receipt and whether the holder previously claimed a bad debt or worthlessness deduction with respect to the Claim, which would affect the adjusted basis of the holder in the Claim.

THE FOREGOING IS INTENDED TO BE A SUMMARY ONLY AND NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR CAREFUL TAX PLANNING OR CONSULTATION WITH A TAX ADVISOR. THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND FOREIGN TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE PLAN ARE COMPLEX AND, IN SOME CASES, UNCERTAIN. SUCH CONSEQUENCES MAY ALSO VARY BASED UPON THE INDIVIDUAL CIRCUMSTANCES OF EACH HOLDER OF A CLAIM OR INTEREST. ACCORDINGLY, EACH HOLDER OF A CLAIM OR INTEREST IS STRONGLY URGED TO CONSULT WITH HIS OR HER OWN TAX ADVISOR REGARDING THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND FOREIGN TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE PLAN.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 67 of 68

Page 68: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

FIRST AMENDED MODIFIED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECOND AMENDEDPLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP - PAGE | 634842-6525-0690.16

IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS IMPOSED BY THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, THE DEBTOR INFROMS ALL RECIPIENTS OF THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT THAT ANY U.S. TAX INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (INCLUDING THE EXHIBITS HERETO) IS NOT INTENDED OR WRITTEN TO BE USED, AND CANNOT BE USED, FOR THE PURPOSE OF (A) AVOIDING PENALTIES UNDER THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE, OR (B) PROMOTING, MARKETING, OR RECOMMENDING TO ANOTHER PARTY ANY TRANSACTION OR MATTER ADDRESSED HEREIN.

ARTICLE XV RECOMMENDATION OF THE DEBTORS

The Debtors believe the Plan is in the best interests of all Creditors. Accordingly, the Debtors recommend that you vote for acceptance of the Plan and hereby solicit your acceptance of the Plan.

DATED: August ___, 2019 Respectfully submitted,

Reagor-Dykes Motors, LP et al.

By: /s/ Robert Schleizer Chief Restructuring Officer

Prepared by:

Marcus A. Helt (TX 24052187) C. Ashley Ellis (TX 00794824) FOLEY GARDERE FOLEY & LARDNER 2021 McKinney Avenue, Suite 1600 Dallas, TX 75201 Telephone: (214) 999-3000 Facsimile: (214) 999-4667

COUNSEL FOR DEBTORS AND DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSION

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 68 of 68

Page 69: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

Exhibit A

Plan of Reorganization

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 1 of 66

Page 70: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

i

_______________________________________________________________________

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES AUTO GROUP

________________________________________________________________________

Marcus A. Helt (TX 24052187) C. Ashley Ellis (TX 00794824)

FOLEY GARDERE FOLEY & LARDNER, LLP

2021 McKinney Avenue, Suite 1600 Dallas, TX 75201

Telephone: (214) 999-3000 Facsimile: (214) 999-4667

[email protected] [email protected]

COUNSEL TO THE DEBTORS AND DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSION

Dated: August ___, 2019

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUBBOCK DIVISION

IN RE:

REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.

Debtors.

§§§§§

Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11 Jointly Administered

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 2 of 66

Page 71: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 3 of 66

Page 72: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 1

The Debtors1 in the above-referenced, jointly-administered Chapter 11 bankruptcy cases (collectively, “Reagor-Dykes” or the “Debtors”) hereby propose this Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization for Reagor-Dykes (the “Plan”) pursuant to §1121(a) of chapter 11 of title 11 of the United States Code, 11 U.S.C. §§ 101, et seq. (the “Bankruptcy Code”).

SUMMARY OF THE PLAN

1. Summary Only. The following is a brief summary of the Plan’s general terms and does not form a part of the Plan. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the provisions of the Plan. Capitalized terms used in this summary are defined in the Plan.

2. General Description of the Business. Reagor-Dykes historically operated eight (8) new and pre-owned car Dealerships comprised of thirteen (13) Locations – twelve (12) in West Texas and one (1) location in Dallas – as a consolidated group.

3. Alternative Paths to the Effective Date. This Plan provides two (2) alternative paths to a successful exit from Chapter 11 for the Debtors: (a) the Restructuring Alternative, or (b) if the Plan does not go effective under the Restructuring Alternative within seventy-five (75) days of Confirmation,2 a controlled liquidation of assets via the Liquidation Alternative. The Debtors believe that the Restructuring Alternative would yield the highest and best return for all creditors and parties in interest. But, if the Debtors determine at any time – pre-Confirmation or post-Confirmation – that despite their best efforts the Plan cannot go effective under the Reorganization Alternative, the Liquidation Alternative shall take effect.

4. Plan and Treatment of Claims – Restructuring Alternative. Under the Restructuring Alternative, the Plan will effectuate a reorganization of the Dealerships, the business, and the operations. Under the Restructuring Alternative:

a) The Dealerships will be recapitalized by the Plan Sponsor or its designee. The Reorganized Debtors will retain their operating assets together with Causes of Action not resolved by this Plan, and will continue to operate their business under a name selected by the Plan Sponsor.

b) The franchise agreements with Ford Motor, General Motors, Mitsubishi, and Toyota will be assumed in the Plan.

1 The Debtors are Reagor-Dykes Motors, LP (“RD Motors”) (Case No. 19-50214); Reagor-Dykes Imports, LP (“RD Imports”) (Case No. 18-50215); Reagor-Dykes Amarillo (“RD Amarillo”)(Case No. 18-50216); Reagor-Dykes Auto Company, LP (“RDAC”)(Case No. 18-50217); Reagor-Dykes Plainview, LP (“RD Plainview”)(Case No. 18-50218); Reagor-Dykes Floydada, LP (“RD Floydada”)(Case No. 18-50219); Reagor-Dykes Snyder, L.P. (“Snyder”) (Case No. 18-50321); Reagor Auto Mall Ltd (“RAM”)(Case No. 18-50324); and Reagor-Dykes III LLC, (Case No. 18-50322), Reagor-Dykes II LLC (Case No. 18-50323), and Reagor Auto Mall I LLC (Case No. 18-50325) (collectively, the “GP Debtors”).

2 Under the Plan, the Restructuring Alternative must go effective within seventy-five (75) days of the Confirmation Date unless otherwise agreed by the United States Trustee or approved by the Court. Any request to extend this seventy-five (75) day deadline must be filed prior to the expiration of same. The timely filing of such a motion shall toll the expiration of the deadline until further ruling by the Court.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 4 of 66

Page 73: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 2

c) Post-confirmation, the Reorganized Debtors will benefit from the proven operational expertise of Fin Ewing and his consulting group (collectively, the “Fin Ewing Group”). The Fin Ewing Group will provide consulting services to the Reorganized Debtors. These consulting services will help the Reorganized Debtors accomplish their long-term business and financial goals as outlined in the Plan.

d) Directors and officers of the Reorganized Debtors will be identified in the Plan Supplement Documents.

e) The Reorganized Debtors are expected to receive up to $13 mm in cash (the “New Equity Infusion”) from the Plan Sponsor. The New Equity Infusion may be a combination of (i) debtor-in-possession financing approved by the Bankruptcy Court and received by the Debtors before the Confirmation in a yet-to-be-determined amount and (ii) equity financing received by the Debtors after the Confirmation.

f) The New Equity Infusion will be used as follows: (i) approximately $4.3 million as initial post-confirmation working capital on an as-needed basis; (ii) pay all allowed, administrative expenses of the Estates, which such expenses are estimated to be approximately $4.5 million; (iii) approximately $.700 million to Qualified Retail Lenders in Class 9; (v) up to approximately $2 million to Ford Credit if certain conditions are satisfied; and (v) up to approximately $1.5 million to GM Financial if certain conditions are satisfied, including if GM Financial provides floorplan financing to the Reorganized Debtors.

g) The equity of the Reorganized Debtors will be owned (i) 90% by the Plan Sponsor or its designee and (ii) 10% by a Creditors Trust for the express benefit of creditors holding Allowed Class 11 General Unsecured Claims.

h) Each Allowed Class 11 Claim will receive a beneficial interest in the Creditors Trust. In addition to the 10% equity interest in the Reorganized Debtors, the Creditors Trust Assets will include $1 million in cash contributed by Rick Dykes.

i) Each beneficial interest and the 10% equity will be subject to a redemption right that will allow the Reorganized Debtors to redeem this equity upon payment in full of the Allowed amount of Unsecured Claims converted to equity or such amount agreed by the holders of such Unsecured Claims and the Reorganized Debtors. After distributions to holders of Allowed Class 11 Unsecured Claims reach a total of $7.5 million, the Creditors’ Trust will surrender this 10% equity to the Reorganized Debtors.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 5 of 66

Page 74: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 3

j) The Creditors Trust will make distributions to all Allowed Unsecured Claims in Class 11 pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Plan and a Creditors Trust Agreement.

k) The Reorganized Debtors will assume certain unsecured Assumed Trade Claims under this Plan. The identity of such assumed unsecured Assumed Trade Claims will be disclosed in the Plan Supplement. Such Assumed Trade Claims will be treated in Class 10 and will not participate in Class 11.

l) Ford Credit’s secured claim will be paid in full by surrender of Collateral.

m) Ford Credit’s unsecured claim will be paid from Excess Cash Flow and only after payment of all Allowed Administrative Expenses by (i) a $1 million cash payment in 2020, (ii) a $1 million cash payment in 2021, and (iii) a $5 million unsecured promissory note.

n) The $5 million unsecured promissory note payable to Ford Credit will have the following terms: (i) 10-year amortization, (ii) 7-year balloon payment, (iii) 6.5% interest per annum, (iv) payment-in-kind interest for 12 months, and (v) payable thereafter from Excess Cash Flow.

o) Payment of the $2.0 million to Ford Credit is subject to and conditioned on (i) the assumption of the Debtors’ franchise agreements with Ford Motor or issuance of a new franchise agreement(s), and (iii) implementation of the Restructuring Alternative under the Plan.

p) GM Financial’s secured claim will be paid in full by surrender of Collateral.

q) GM Financial’s unsecured claim will be paid as follows: As a settlement and full and final satisfaction and release of all unsecured claims, GM Financial will receive (i) $750,000 from Excess Cash Flow by the later of (x) 180 days after the Effective Date and (y) payment of all Allowed Administrative Expenses, and (ii) another $750,000 from Excess Cash Flow no later than twelve (12) months after the first $750,000 payment to GM Financial.

r) Payment of the $1.5 million is subject to and conditioned on (i) GM Financial providing floorplan financing to the Reorganized Debtors on mutually agreed terms, (ii) the assumption of the Debtors’ franchise agreement with General Motors or issuance of a new franchise agreement, and (iii) implementation of the Restructuring Alternative under the Plan.

s) First Capital Bank’s secured claim will be paid as follows: In full

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 6 of 66

Page 75: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 4

and final satisfaction of all First Capital’s secured claims against the Debtors, First Capital Bank will receive (a) the net proceeds from the liquidation of collateral after payment of (i) all fees incurred and (ii) expenses reimbursed related to the liquidation of such collateral, or (b) surrender of collateral.

t) First Capital Bank’s unsecured claim is a Disputed Claim. To the extent Allowed, First Capital Bank’s unsecured claim will be treated in Class 11 and paid as follows: In full and final satisfaction and release of all First Capital’s unsecured claims against the Debtors, First Capital Bank will receive its Pro Rata Share of Creditors Trust Assets, which includes 10% equity securities of the Reorganized Debtors. All Causes of Action against First Capital Bank are reserved under this Plan.

u) FB&T’s secured claim will be paid as follows: In full and final satisfaction of all secured claims against the Debtors, FB&T will receive (a) the net proceeds from the liquidation of collateral after payment of (i) all fees incurred and (ii) expenses reimbursed related to the liquidation of such collateral, or (b) surrender of collateral.

v) FB&T’s unsecured claim is a Disputed Claim. To the extent Allowed, FB&T’s unsecured claim will be treated in Class 11 and paid as follows: In full and final satisfaction and release of all FB&T’s unsecured claims against the Debtors, FB&T will receive its Pro Rata Share of Creditors Trust Assets, which includes 10% equity securities of the Reorganized Debtors. All Causes of Action against FB&T are reserved under this Plan.

w) Pursuant to the Plan, the Dealerships or Locations will be operated on the same real estate where the Dealerships or Locations were operated prior to and during the bankruptcy case. That real estate is now owned by IBC Bank. IBC Bank has given Rick Dykes and his assigns both an option right and a right of first refusal to purchase the real estate at mutually-agreed and confidential “strike prices.” To facilitate the Restructuring Alternative, Rick Dykes has agreed to assign his option and right of first refusal to the Reorganized Debtors to implement the Restructuring Alternative.

x) Each Qualified Retail Lender who (i) executes a TT&L Agreement, (ii) provides the Reorganized Debtors with proof of payment of a TT&L/Trade Liability, and (iii) agrees to provide future retail lending to the Reorganized Debtors on terms mutually acceptable to the Reorganized Debtors and said Retail Lender, thereby becoming a Qualified Retail Lender, will be reimbursed their Pro Rata Share for payment of the Debtors’ TT&L/Trade Liability either (x) within sixty (60) days after the Effective Date if funds are immediately available or (y) via receipt of an unsecured promissory

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 7 of 66

Page 76: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 5

note payable by the Reorganized Debtors at 3% interest per annum with a two-year term. Such reimbursement will be made from the Qualified Retail Lender Pool. This Qualified Retail Lender Pool will be up to $.700 million.

y) Allowed Administrative Claims will be paid at or before the Effective Date, or on such terms as the Reorganized Debtors and the holder of an Allowed Administrative Claim may otherwise agree.

5. Plan and Treatment of Claims – Liquidation Alternative. Under the Liquidation Alternative, the Plan will effect an orderly wind down of the Debtors’ business operations, a controlled liquidation of all Collateral, and the transfer of all Causes of Action to the Creditors Trust. Pursuant to the terms of the Plan and the Liquidation Alternative:

a) A Creditors Trust will be established and the Creditors Trustee will be appointed upon Confirmation.

b) All Assets, including Causes of Action, and all rights to challenge the extent, priority and validity of alleged liens, and all Collateral not surrendered under the terms of this Plan will be transferred to the Creditors Trust and the Creditors Trustee.

c) All Holders of Allowed Administrative Claims will be paid from liquidation proceeds in their relative priorities, all Holders of Allowed Unsecured Claims will receive a beneficial interest in the Creditors Trust equal to the pro rata amount of their Allowed Unsecured Claim, and the Creditors Trustee will make distributions to all Allowed Unsecured Claims in Class 11 pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Plan and a Creditors Trust Agreement.

d) Ford Credit’s Allowed Secured Claim will be paid in full by surrender of Collateral.

e) Ford Credit’s Unsecured Claim is a Disputed Claim. To the extent Allowed, Ford Credit’s Unsecured Claim will be treated in Class 12 and paid as follows: In full and final satisfaction and release of all Ford Credit’s Unsecured Claims against the Debtors, Ford Credit will receive its Pro Rata Share of the Creditors Trust Assets. All Causes of Action against Ford Credit are reserved under the Liquidation Alternative in this Plan.

f) GM Financial’s Allowed Secured Claim will be paid in full surrender of Collateral.

g) GM Financial’s Unsecured Claim is a Disputed Claim. To the extent Allowed, GM Financial’s Unsecured Claim will be treated in Class 13 and paid as follows: In full and final satisfaction and

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 8 of 66

Page 77: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 6

release of all GM Financial’s Unsecured Claims against the Debtors, GM Financial will receive its Pro Rata Share of the Creditors Trust Assets. All Causes of Action against GM Financial are reserved under the Liquidation Alternative in this Plan.

h) FB&T’s secured claim is a Disputed Claim. To the extent Allowed, FB&T’s Secured Claim will be paid as follows: In full and final satisfaction of all secured claims against the Debtors, FB&T will receive (i) the net proceeds from the liquidation of collateral after payment of (x) all fees incurred and (y) expenses reimbursed related to the liquidation of such collateral, or (ii) surrender of collateral.

i) FB&T’s unsecured claim is a Disputed Claim. To the extent Allowed, FB&T’s unsecured claim will be treated in Class 11 and paid as follows: In full and final satisfaction and release of all FB&T’s unsecured claims against the Debtors, FB&T will receive its Pro Rata Share of the Creditors Trust Assets. All Causes of Action against FB&T are reserved under this Plan.

j) The Creditors Trust shall make distributions to Holders of Allowed Class 11 Unsecured Claims of their Pro Rata Share (calculated together with Allowed Claims in Classes 12, 13, 14 and 15) of the Creditors Trust Assets.

Regardless of the alternative, all Causes of Action are hereby preserved.

Creditors holding Allowed Claims shall receive the following treatment under the Plan:

CLASS

CLAIMANT TREATMENT:RESTRUCTURING

ALTERNATIVE

TREATMENT:LIQUIDATION ALTERNATIVE

1. ALLOWED PRIORITY NON-TAX CLAIMS

Shall receive (i) Cash in an amount equal to the Allowed amount of such Priority Non-Tax Claim on the Effective Date or (ii) other treatment consistent with the provisions of § 1129(a)(9) of the Bankruptcy Code; provided, however, that Priority Non-Tax Claims that arise in the ordinary course of the Debtors’ business shall be paid by the Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors, as applicable, in the ordinary course of business.

Shall receive (i) Cash in an amount equal to the Allowed amount of such Priority Non-Tax Claim on the Effective Date or (ii) other treatment consistent with the provisions of § 1129(a)(9) of the Bankruptcy Code.

1A. ALLOWED 9019 LUBBOCK COUNTY CLAIM

Shall receive Cash as soon reasonably practicable when funds are available after the Effective Date consistent with the 9019 Order. Any amounts due to Lubbock County Tax Assessor will

Shall receive Cash as soon reasonably practicable when funds are available after the Effective Date consistent with the 9019 Order.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 9 of 66

Page 78: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 7

CLASS

CLAIMANT TREATMENT: RESTRUCTURING

ALTERNATIVE

TREATMENT: LIQUIDATION ALTERNATIVE

be paid before payment to General Unsecured Creditors.

2. SECURED CLAIM OF FORD CREDIT COMPANY, LLC

Ford Credit’s Class 2 Claim will be paid by surrender of the Collateral.

The amount, validity, extent, value, and priority of the Allowed Secured Class 2 Claim under § 506 of the Bankruptcy Code will be determined by the Bankruptcy Court after the Effective Date or pursuant to an agreement between the Reorganized Debtors and the Holder of the Class 2 Claim. Any Deficiency Claim or other Unsecured Claim of the Holder of the Class 2 Claim shall be treated in Class 12.

Ford Credit’s Class 2 Claim will be paid by surrender of the Collateral.

The amount, validity, extent, value, and priority of the Allowed Secured Class 2 Claim under § 506 of the Bankruptcy Code will be determined by the Bankruptcy Court after the Effective Date. Any Deficiency Claim or other Unsecured Claim of the Holder of the Class 2 Claim shall be treated in Class 12.

3. SECURED CLAIM OF GM FINANCIAL

GM Financial’s Class 3 Claim will be paid by surrender of the Collateral.

The amount, validity, extent, value, and priority of the Allowed Secured Class 3 Claim under § 506 of the Bankruptcy Code will be determined by the Bankruptcy Court after the Effective Date or pursuant to an agreement between the Reorganized Debtors and the Holder of the Class 3 Claim. Any Deficiency Claim or other Unsecured Claim of the Holder of the Class 3 Claim shall be treated in Class 13.

GM Financial’s Class 3 Claim will be paid by surrender of the Collateral.

The amount, validity, extent, value, and priority of the Allowed Secured Class 3 Claim under § 506 of the Bankruptcy Code will be determined by the Bankruptcy Court after the Effective Date. Any Deficiency Claim or other Unsecured Claim of the Holder of the Class 3 Claim shall be treated in Class 13.

4. SECURED CLAIM OF FIRST CAPITAL BANK

The Class 4 Claim will be satisfied in full and final satisfaction, settlement, release, and discharge of such Class 4 Claim (a) pursuant to an agreement between the Reorganized Debtors and the Holder of Class 4 Claim or (b) if no agreement is reached, at the Reorganized Debtors’ sole and absolute option, (i) the net proceeds from the liquidation of collateral after payment of all fees incurred and

First Capital Bank’s Class 4 Claim will be satisfied in full by surrender of the Collateral.

The amount, validity, extent, value, and priority of the Allowed Secured Class 4 Claim under § 506 of the Bankruptcy Code will be determined by the Bankruptcy Court after the Effective Date. Any Deficiency Claim or other Unsecured Claim of the Holder of the

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 10 of 66

Page 79: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 8

CLASS

CLAIMANT TREATMENT: RESTRUCTURING

ALTERNATIVE

TREATMENT: LIQUIDATION ALTERNATIVE

expenses reimbursed related to the liquidation of such collateral, or (ii) surrender of collateral.

The amount, validity, extent, value, and priority of the Allowed Secured Class 4 Claim under § 506 of the Bankruptcy Code will be determined by the Bankruptcy Court after the Effective Date or pursuant to an agreement between the Reorganized Debtors and the Holder of the Class 4 Claim. Any Deficiency Claim or other Unsecured Claim of the Holder of the Class 4 Claim shall be treated in Class 11.

Class 4 Claim shall be treated in Class11.

5. CLAIM OF FIRST BANK & TRUST

The Class 5 Claim will be satisfied in full and final satisfaction, settlement, release, and discharge of such Class 5 Claim (a) pursuant to an agreement between the Reorganized Debtors and the Holder of Class 5 Claim or (b) if no agreement is reached, at the Reorganized Debtors’ sole and absolute option, (i) the net proceeds from the liquidation of collateral after payment of all fees incurred and expenses reimbursed related to the liquidation of such collateral, or (ii) surrender of collateral.

The amount, validity, extent, value, and priority of the Allowed Secured Class 5 Claim under § 506 of the Bankruptcy Code will be determined by the Bankruptcy Court after the Effective Date or pursuant to an agreement between the Reorganized Debtors and the Holder of the Class 5 Claim. Any Deficiency Claim or other Unsecured Claim of the Holder of the Class 5 Claim shall be treated in Class 11.

FB&T’s Class 5 Claim will be paid by surrender of the Collateral.

The amount, validity, extent, value, and priority of the Allowed Secured Class 5 Claim under § 506 of the Bankruptcy Code will be determined by the Bankruptcy Court after the Effective Date. Any Deficiency Claim or other Unsecured Claim of the Holder of the Class 5 Claim shall be treated in Class 11.

6. SECURED CLAIM OF AIM BANK

The Class 6 Claim will be satisfied in full and final satisfaction, settlement, release, and discharge of such Class 6 Claim (a) pursuant to an agreement between the Reorganized Debtors and the Holder of Class 6 Claim or (b) if no agreement is reached, at the Reorganized Debtors’ sole and absolute option, (i) the net proceeds from the liquidation of collateral after

AIM Bank’s Class 6 Claim will be paid by surrender of the Collateral.

The amount, validity, extent, value, and priority of the Allowed Secured Class 6 Claim under § 506 of the Bankruptcy Code will be determined by the Bankruptcy Court after the Effective Date. Any Deficiency Claim or other Unsecured Claim of the Holder of the

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 11 of 66

Page 80: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 9

CLASS

CLAIMANT TREATMENT: RESTRUCTURING

ALTERNATIVE

TREATMENT: LIQUIDATION ALTERNATIVE

payment of all fees incurred and expenses reimbursed related to the liquidation of such collateral, or (ii) surrender of collateral.

The amount, validity, extent, value, and priority of the Allowed Secured Class 6 Claim under § 506 of the Bankruptcy Code will be determined by the Bankruptcy Court after the Effective Date or pursuant to an agreement between the Reorganized Debtors and the Holder of the Class 6 Claim. Any Deficiency Claim or other Unsecured Claim of the Holder of the Class 6 Claim shall be treated in Class 11.

Class 6 Claim shall be treated in Class 11.

7. SECURED CLAIM OF VISTA BANK

The Class 7 Claim will be satisfied in full and final satisfaction, settlement, release, and discharge of such Class 7 Claim (a) pursuant to an agreement between the Reorganized Debtors and the Holder of Class 7 Claim or (b) if no agreement is reached, at the Reorganized Debtors’ sole and absolute option, (i) the net proceeds from the liquidation of collateral after payment of all fees incurred and expenses reimbursed related to the liquidation of such collateral, or (ii) surrender of collateral.

The amount, validity, extent, value, and priority of the Allowed Secured Class 7 Claim under § 506 of the Bankruptcy Code will be determined by the Bankruptcy Court after the Effective Date or pursuant to an agreement between the Reorganized Debtors and the Holder of the Class 7 Claim. Any Deficiency Claim or other Unsecured Claim of the Holder of the Class 7 Claim shall be treated in Class 11.

Vista Bank’s Class 7 Claim will be paid by surrender of the Collateral.

The amount, validity, extent, value, and priority of the Allowed Secured Class 7 Claim under § 506 of the Bankruptcy Code will be determined by the Bankruptcy Court after the Effective Date. Any Deficiency Claim or other Unsecured Claim of the Holder of the Class 7 Claim shall be treated in Class 11.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 12 of 66

Page 81: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 10

CLASS

CLAIMANT TREATMENT: RESTRUCTURING

ALTERNATIVE

TREATMENT: LIQUIDATION ALTERNATIVE

8. OTHER SECURED CLAIMS

Holders of Allowed Class 8 Claims, if any, shall be designated as Class 8A, Class 8B et seq. and shall be satisfied at the Reorganized Debtors’ option by (i) payment of such Allowed Secured Claim in full in cash, including interest, if applicable, as required under § 506(b) of the Bankruptcy Code; (ii) delivery of the Collateral securing such Allowed Secured Claim; or (iii) issuance of a restructured note with a present value equal to the amount of the value of each Holder’s Collateral with interest payable at a rate of 3% annually, and payable in full in ten (10) years.

The amount, validity, extent, value, and priority, of any asserted Class 8 Claim under § 506 of the Bankruptcy Code will be determined by the Bankruptcy Court after the Effective Date or pursuant to an agreement between the Reorganized Debtors and the Holder of the Class 8 Claim. Any Deficiency Claim or other Unsecured Claim of the Holder of the Class 8 Claim shall be treated in Class 11.

Holders of Allowed Class 8 Claims, if any, shall be designated as Class 8A, Class 8B et seq. and will be paid by surrender of the Collateral.

The amount, validity, extent, value, and priority of the Allowed Secured Class 8 Claim under § 506 of the Bankruptcy Code will be determined by the Bankruptcy Court after the Effective Date. Any Deficiency Claim or other Unsecured Claim of the Holder of the Class 8 Claim shall be treated in Class 11.

9. CLAIMS OF QUALIFIED RETAIL LENDERS FOR PAYMENT OF TT&L/TRADE LIABILITY

As full and final satisfaction, settlement, release, and discharge of such Class 9 Claim, each Qualified Retail Lender in Class 9 will receive its Pro Rata Share from the Qualified Retail Lender Pool for reimbursement for such Qualified Retail Lenders’ payment of a TT&L/Trade Liability.

N/A under Liquidation Alternative

10. ASSUMED TRADE CLAIMS

As full and final satisfaction, settlement, release, and discharge of such Class 10 Claim, each member of the Plan Sponsor, the Debtors, and the Reorganized Debtors, each Holder of a Class 10 Claim will receive payment in full, over time, through the assumption of the indebtedness underlying the Allowed Class 10 Claim payable on terms to be agreed by each Holder of a Assumed Trade Claim and the Reorganized Debtors.

N/A under Liquidation Alternative

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 13 of 66

Page 82: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 11

CLASS

CLAIMANT TREATMENT: RESTRUCTURING

ALTERNATIVE

TREATMENT: LIQUIDATION ALTERNATIVE

11. GENERAL UNSECURED CLAIMS

As full and final satisfaction, settlement, release, and discharge of each Class 11 Claim against the Debtors, each member of the Plan Sponsor, and the Reorganized Debtors, each Holder of a Class 11 Claim shall be satisfied by Pro Rata Share of Distributions from Creditors Trust Assets.3

As full and final satisfaction, settlement, release, and discharge of each Class 11 Claim against the Debtors, each Holder of a Class 11 Claim shall be satisfied by Pro Rata Share (calculated together with Allowed Claims in Classes 12, 13, 14 and 15) of Distributions from the Creditors Trust Assets.

12. UNSECURED CLAIMS OF FORD CREDIT4

Ford Credit’s Unsecured Claim will be paid from Excess Cash Flow and only after payment of all Allowed Administrative Expenses by (i) a $1 million cash payment in 2020, (ii) a $1 million cash payment in 2021, and (iii) a $5 million unsecured promissory note.

The $5 million unsecured promissory note will have the following terms: (i) 10-year amortization, (ii) 7-year balloon payment, (iii) 6.5% interest per annum, (iv) payment-in-kind interest for 12 months, and (v) payable thereafter from Excess Cash Flow.

Ford Credit’s Unsecured Claim is a Disputed Claim. To the extent Allowed, Ford Credit’s Unsecured Claim will be treated in Class 12 and paid as follows: In full and final satisfaction and release of all Ford Credit’s Unsecured Claims against the Debtors, Ford Credit will receive its Pro Rata Share (calculated together with Allowed Claims in Classes 11, 13, 14 and 15) of Distributions from the Creditors Trust Assets. All Causes of Action against Ford Credit are reserved under this Plan.

3 Percentage Distribution to Holders of Allowed Class 11 Claims is dependent on a variety of risks and factors, including the success of the Reorganized Debtors’ post-confirmation business operations, value of the Creditors Trust Assets, the administration costs of the Creditor Trust, and whether the Restructuring or Liquidation Alternative proceeds.

4 Classes 12 and 13 Claims are held by Ford Credit and GM Financial, respectively. Each is an affiliate of Original Equipment Manufacturers or “franchisors” that are parties to franchise or “dealer” agreements with one or more of the Debtors. The Class 12 and 13 Claims asserted by Ford Credit and GM Financial arise, in whole or in part from money loaned for the purchase of vehicles from the Original Equipment Manufacturers, and in Ford Credit’s case from allegations of out-of-trust sales or double floorplanned inventory as stated in pleadings in this Chapter 11 Case and the Ford Litigation. For those reasons, the Claims in Classes 12 and 13 are qualitatively dissimilar to Assumed Trade Claims in Class 10 or General Unsecured Claims in Class 11.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 14 of 66

Page 83: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 12

CLASS

CLAIMANT TREATMENT: RESTRUCTURING

ALTERNATIVE

TREATMENT: LIQUIDATION ALTERNATIVE

13. UNSECURED CLAIMS OF GM FINANCIAL

GM Financial’s unsecured claim will be paid as follows: As a settlement and full and final satisfaction and release of all unsecured claims, GM Financial will receive (i) $750,000 from Excess Cash Flow by the later of (x) 180 days after the Effective Date and (y) payment of all Allowed Administrative Expenses and (ii) another $750,000 from Excess Cash Flow no later than twelve (12) months after the first $750,000 payment to GM Financial.

GM Financial’s Allowed Unsecured Claim will be treated in Class 13 and paid as follows: In full and final satisfaction and release of all GM Financial’s Unsecured Claims against the Debtors, GM Financial will receive its Pro Rata Share (calculated together with Allowed Claims in Classes 11, 12, 14 and 15) of Distributions from the Creditors Trust Assets. All Causes of Action against GM Financial are reserved under the Liquidation Alternative in this Plan.

14. UNSECURED CLAIMS OF IBC BANK

All prepetition claims of IBC Bank against the Debtors, held directly or indirectly, will be forgiven, and there will be no Distributions to Claims in Class 14.

Allowed Claims in Class 14 will receive their Pro Rata Share of the Creditors Trust Assets.

15. UNSECURED CLAIMS OF BART REAGOR AND RICK DYKES5

There will be no Distributions to Claims in Class 15.

Allowed Claims in Class 15 will receive their Pro Rata Share of the Creditors Trust Assets.

16. INTERCOMPANY CLAIMS

There will be no Distributions to Claims in Class 16.

There will be no Distributions to Claims in Class 16.

17. UNSECURED SUBORDINATED CLAIMS

There will be no Distributions to Claims in Class 17.

There will be no Distributions to Claims in Class 17.

18. INTERESTS IN THE DEBTORS

All Interests will be cancelled and discharged on the Effective Date, and no holder of an Interest shall receive a Distribution on account of such Interest.

All Interests will be cancelled and discharged on the Effective Date, and no holder of an Interest shall receive a Distribution on account of such Interest.

5 The Class 15 Claims are held by Insiders. The estimated amount of the Class 15 Claims is at least $1.8 million. As part of a Restructuring under this Plan, the Holders of the Class 15 Claims have agreed to waive and forego all Unsecured Claims they hold against the Debtors and will receive no Distribution under this Plan.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 15 of 66

Page 84: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 13

ARTICLE IINTRODUCTION

1.1. Introduction.

This Plan is proposed by and on behalf of the Debtors under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. Reference is made to the Disclosure Statement accompanying the Plan for a discussion of the Debtors’ history, results of operations, and for a summary and analysis of the Plan. All Holders of Claims against and Interests in the Debtors are encouraged to read the Plan and the Disclosure Statement in their entirety before voting to accept or reject the Plan. Other than the Disclosure Statement and any exhibits and schedules referenced therein or herein, no materials have otherwise been approved by the Debtors for use in soliciting acceptances of this Plan.

1.2. General Plan Structure; Funding Sources for Restructuring Alternative; Liquidation Alternative.

The New Equity Infusion from the Plan Sponsor will be used to consummate the Restructuring Alternative under this Plan. The New Equity Infusion will be a combination of (i) debtor-in-possession financing approved by the Bankruptcy Court and received by the Debtors before the Confirmation in a yet-to-be-determined amount and (ii) equity financing received by the Debtors after the Confirmation. The New Equity Infusion will be used as follows: (i) approximately $4.3 million as initial post-confirmation working capital on an as-needed basis; (ii) pay all allowed, administrative expenses of the Estates, which such expenses are estimated to be approximately $4.5 million; (iii) approximately $.700 million to Qualified Retail Lenders in Class 9; (v) up to $2 million to Ford Credit from Excess Cash Flow and subject to satisfaction of certain conditions; and (v) up to $1.5 million to GM Financial from Excess Cash Flow and subject to satisfaction of certain conditions, including if GM Financial provides floorplan financing to the Reorganized Debtors.

If the Restructuring Alternative is unsuccessful, the Plan will instead go effective via the orderly and controlled disposition of all Assets by the Creditors Trustee under the Liquidation Alternative.

ARTICLE IIDEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION

In addition to such other terms as may be defined in other provisions of the Plan, the following capitalized terms shall have the following meanings:

2.1. Definitions.

“9019 Lubbock County Claim” means the Allowed Priority Claim of Lubbock County pursuant to the 9019 Order.

“9019 Order” means the Order granting the Amended Motion for Approval of Settlement and Compromise with Lubbock County Tax Assessor-Collector Under Bankruptcy Rule 9019 [Docket No. 1147].

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 16 of 66

Page 85: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 14

“Administrative Claim” means any cost or expense of administration in connection with this Case of a kind specified in §§ 503(b) or 507(a)(1), including, without limitation, (a) the actual, necessary costs and expenses of preserving the Estates and of operating the business of the Debtors, including wages, salaries, commissions, or any other compensation for services rendered after the commencement of the bankruptcy case; (b) compensation for legal or other services, and reimbursement of costs and expenses under §§ 330(a) or 331, 363, or otherwise allowed by the Court; and (c) all fees and charges assessed against the Estate under 28 U.S.C. § 1930. For the avoidance of doubt, Administrative Claims include (a) fees earned and expenses incurred by Professionals; and (b) expenses incurred, if any, by an Entity in making a substantial contribution in the Case pursuant to §§ 503(b)(3) or (4).

“Affiliate” means as set forth in § 101(2) of the Bankruptcy Code.

“Allowed” means, with respect to Claims and Interests, (a) any Claim against or Interest in the Debtors, proof of which is timely Filed or by order of the Bankruptcy Court is not or will not be required to be Filed, (b) any Claim or Interest that has been or is hereafter listed in the Schedules as neither disputed, contingent nor unliquidated, and for which no timely Filed proof of Claim has been Filed, (c) any Interest registered in the Debtors’ books and records as of the Petition Date or (d) any Claim allowed pursuant to the Plan and, in each such case in (a), (b) and (c) above, as to which either (i) no objection to the allowance thereof has been Filed within the applicable period of time fixed by the Plan, the Bankruptcy Code, the Bankruptcy Rules, or the Bankruptcy Court, (ii) such an objection is so Filed and the Claim or Interest shall have been allowed pursuant to a Final Order (but only to the extent so allowed), or (iii) such an objection is so Filed and the Claim or Interest shall have been stipulated as allowed by the Reorganized Debtor, (but only to the extent so stipulated).

“Assets” means all assets of the Estates, including Causes of Action.

“Assumed Trade Claims” means Claims, in the sole and absolute discretion of the Reorganized Debtors, that will be assumed by the Reorganized Debtors and paid pursuant to an agreement between each Holder of an Assumed Trade Claim and the Reorganized Debtors if this Plan is Confirmed under the Restructuring Alternative.

“Ballot” means the ballot form on which Holders of Impaired Claims entitled to vote on the Plan shall indicate their acceptance or rejection of the Plan.

“Bankruptcy Code” means the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978, as subsequently amended, principally codified at 11 U.S.C. § 101, et seq. Unless otherwise stated herein or the Disclosure Statement, all section (§) references contained in the Plan and Disclosure Statement are to the Bankruptcy Code.

“Bankruptcy Court” or “Court” means the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas, Lubbock Division, or, if such court ceases to have jurisdiction over the Cases, such court or adjunct thereof having jurisdiction over the Case.

“Bankruptcy Rules” means the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure promulgated by the United States Supreme Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2075 as subsequently amended, and, where appropriate, the Local Bankruptcy Rules of the Bankruptcy Court.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 17 of 66

Page 86: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 15

“Bar Date” means the deadline for timely Filing proofs of claim and proofs of interest by all parties other than governmental units. For RD Motors, RD Imports, RD Amarillo, RDAC, RD Plainview, RD Floydada, the Bar Date was December 5, 2018, for all parties other than governmental units and is/was January 28, 2019, for the Filing of proofs of claims by all governmental units. For RAM, Snyder and the GP Debtors, the Bar Date is/was March 28, 2019, for the Filing of proofs of claim and proofs of interest by all parties other than governmental units, and is/was May 1, 2019, for the Filing of proofs of claims by all governmental units. The Bar Date is the last date on which proofs of claim or proofs of interest may be timely Filed against the Debtors.

“Business Day” means any day except Saturday, Sunday, or any other day on which the law authorizes commercial banks in the State of Texas to be closed.

“Cash” means cash and cash equivalents that evidence immediately available funds.

“Cash Collateral” means any Cash of the Debtors, or interest in Cash of the Debtors, that serves as security for the repayment of a debt or the performance of an obligation owed by one or more of the Debtors to the holder of an Allowed Secured Claim.

“Causes of Action” means any action, cause of action, suit, account, controversy, agreement, promise, right to legal remedies, right to equitable remedies, right to payment, and Claim, whether known or unknown, reduced to judgment, not reduced to judgment, liquidated, unliquidated, fixed, contingent, matured, unmatured, disputed, undisputed, secured, unsecured and whether asserted or assertable directly or indirectly or derivatively, in law, equity or otherwise, including (a) Chapter 5 Causes of Action; (b) those claims involved in those civil actions identified in each of the Debtors’ Statements of Financial Affairs; (c) other damages (general, exemplary, or both) relating to or based on (i) fraud, negligence, gross negligence, willful misconduct, or any tort actions, (ii) violations of federal or state securities laws, (iii) violations of applicable corporate or partnership laws, (iv) breaches of fiduciary or agency duties, or (v) causes of action based on alter ego or other liability theories; (vi) based on any other claim of the Debtors, to the extent not specifically compromised or released pursuant to the Plan or an agreement referred to, or incorporated into, the Plan or Final Order entered after notice and opportunity for hearing; (d) any claims of the Debtors for equitable subordination under § 510(c) or under other applicable laws; (e) any claim of the Debtors to recharacterize one or more Claims as Interests; and (f) any unresolved objection to any Disputed Claim.

“Chapter 5 Causes of Action” means any Cause of Action arising under §§ 510, 544 through 551 and 553 or otherwise under the Bankruptcy Code.

“Chapter 7” means chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code.

“Chapter 11” means chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code.

“Chapter 11 Cases” means, collectively, the voluntary Chapter 11 cases Filed by each of the Debtors, currently pending in the Bankruptcy Court under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, each a Case, jointly administered under Case No. 18-50214.

“Claim” means a claim against any one of the Debtors, whether or not asserted, as defined in § 101(5), by whatever right the Creditor may have against such Debtor.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 18 of 66

Page 87: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 16

“Claims Objection Deadline” shall be 270 days after the Effective Date, unless extended by Order of the Court.

“Class” means any group of substantially similar Claims or Interests classified by the Plan pursuant to § 1122.

“Collateral” means any property of one or more of the Debtors or interest in property of one or more of the Debtors that serves as security for the repayment of a debt or the performance of an obligation owed by one or more of the Debtors to the holder of an Allowed Secured Claim.

“Confirmation” means the entry of an order by the Court confirming this Plan pursuant to § 1129 of the Bankruptcy Code.

“Confirmation Date” means the date of the entry of the Confirmation Order by the Bankruptcy Court.

“Confirmation Hearing” means the hearing held by the Bankruptcy Court regarding Confirmation of the Plan, as such may be continued from time to time.

“Confirmation Order” means the order signed by the Court and caused to be entered that confirms this Plan pursuant to § 1129 of the Bankruptcy Code.

“Contingent Claim” means a Claim whose existence, or alleged liability of one or more of the Debtors thereon, is dependent on an event that has not occurred or may never occur.

“Creditor” means any Entity that is the holder of a Claim that arose on or before the Petition Date or a Claim of the kind specified in § 502(g), 502(h) or 502(i).

“Creditors Trust” means the trust to be created pursuant to Article VIII of the Plan.

“Creditors Trust Agreement” means the trust agreement governing the Creditors Trust, substantially in the form filed with the Bankruptcy Court as a Plan Supplement Document executed by the Debtors and the Trustee.

“Creditors Trust Assets” means (a) under the Restructuring Alternative, 10% of the New Equity of the Reorganized Debtors that will be issued to the Creditors Trust pursuant to a Restructuring under this Plan for the express benefit of creditors holding Allowed Class 11 Claims against the Debtors, subject to the New Equity Redemption Right, provided however, that after distributions to holders of Allowed Class 11 Unsecured Claims reach a total of $7.5 million, the Creditors’ Trust will surrender this 10% equity to the Reorganized Debtors; and (b) under the Liquidation Alternative, all Causes of Action and the Litigation Proceeds for the express benefit of creditors holding Allowed Class 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15 Claims; in no event shall the Creditors Trust Assets exceed the Allowed aggregate amount of Class 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15 Claims.

“Creditors Trust Beneficiaries” means Holders of Allowed Class 11 Claims.

“Creditors Trust Interest” means the beneficial ownership interest in the Creditors Trust entitling the Holder of Allowed Class 11 Claims to share in Distribution of the Creditors Trust Assets.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 19 of 66

Page 88: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 17

“Creditors Trustee” means Dennis Faulkner of Lain, Faulkner & Co., P.C., assisted as necessary by BlackBriar Advisors, LLC.

“Dealerships” means one or more of the Debtor entities.

“Debtors” means Reagor-Dykes Motors, LP (Case NO. 18-50214), Reagor-Dykes Imports, LP (Case No. 18-50215), Reagor-Dykes Amarillo (Case No. 18-50216), Reagor-Dykes Auto Company, LP (Case No. 18-50217), Reagor-Dykes Plainview, LP (Case No. 18-50218), Reagor-Dykes Floydada, LP (Case No. 18-50219), Reagor-Dykes Snyder, L.P. (Case No. 18-50321), Reagor-Dykes III LLC, (Case No. 18-50322), Reagor-Dykes II LLC (Case No. 18-50323), Reagor Auto Mall Ltd (Case No. 18-50324) and Reagor Auto Mall I LLC (Case No. 18-50325).

“Deficiency Claim” means any portion of a Claim (a) to the extent the value of the holder’s interest in Assets securing such Claim is less than the amount of such Claim or (b) to the extent the amount of a Claim is subject to setoff is less than the amount of the Claim, each as determined by § 506(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.

“Disallowed” means, with respect to a Claim, any portion thereof, that (a) has been disallowed by either a Final Order or pursuant to a settlement, or (b)(i) is set forth in the Schedules at zero or as contingent, disputed, or unliquidated and (ii) as to which a Bar Date has been established but no proof of claim has been Filed or deemed timely Filed with the Bankruptcy Court pursuant to either the Bankruptcy Code or any Final Order of the Bankruptcy Court or otherwise deemed timely Filed under applicable law.

“Disclosure Statement” means that certain Disclosure Statement in Support of Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization for Reagor-Dykes accompanying this Plan, as approved by the Bankruptcy Court for distribution pursuant to § 1125 [Docket No. __], together with any amendments or modifications thereto.

“Disputed Claim” means the portion (including, when appropriate, the whole) of a Claim that is not an Allowed Claim as to which: (a) a proof of Claim has been Filed, or deemed Filed under applicable law or order of the Bankruptcy Court; (b) an objection has been or may be timely Filed; and (c) such objection has not been: (i) withdrawn, (ii) overruled or denied in whole or in part pursuant to a Final Order, or (iii) granted in whole or part pursuant to a Final Order. Before the time that an objection has been or may be Filed, a Claim shall be considered a Disputed Claim (a) if the amount or classification of the Claim specified in the proof of Claim exceeds the amount or classification of any corresponding Claim scheduled by a Debtor in its Schedules, to the extent of such excess; (b) in its entirety, if any corresponding Claim scheduled by a Debtor has been scheduled as disputed, contingent or unliquidated in its Schedules; or (c) in its entirety, if no corresponding Claim has been scheduled by a Debtor in its Schedules.

“Disputed Claim Reserve Account” means the reserve account created pursuant to this Plan for the benefit of Unsecured Disputed Claims that become Allowed Claims.

“Disputed Administrative Claim Reserve Account” means the reserve account created pursuant to this Plan for the benefit of the Disputed Administrative, Priority Claims or Other Secured Claims that become Allowed Claims.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 20 of 66

Page 89: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 18

“Distribution(s)” means the payment of money or issuance of interest in accordance with this Plan.

“EBITDA” means for any period of consolidated Debtors, the net income of consolidated Debtors, determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles consistently applied, plus (a) interest expense for such period, plus (b) federal and state income taxes of Debtors for such period, plus (c) all depreciation and amortization of capitalized costs for such period. The adjustments described in (a), (b) and (c) above shall be made only to the extent such amounts were deducted from or included in the calculation of Debtors’ net income.

“Effective Date” means the first Business Day on which all conditions to the occurrence of the Effective Date, as set forth in this Plan, have been satisfied or duly waived.

“Entity(ies)” means any individual, corporation, partnership, joint venture, association, joint stock company, unincorporated organization, estate, trust, governmental unit, or other entity including one of the Debtors and the United States Trustee, whether singular or plural.

“Estates” means the bankruptcy estates created in these Cases pursuant to § 541 of the Bankruptcy Code.

“Estimated Claim” means any Disputed Claim which is estimated in accordance with §502(c) of the Code. For purposes of distribution, the estimated amount of such Disputed Claim shall be deemed the Allowed Amount of such Claim. For the full satisfaction of its Estimated Claim, a Claimant shall have, as its sole and exclusive remedy, the rights to payment provided under this Plan and shall have no other rights or remedies and may not, following the Effective Date, assert any other right against the Debtors, Claimant’s Estimated Claim being deemed Allowed and fully satisfied by the Debtors’ payment obligations described in this Plan, and any amount in excess thereof being fully released, voided and discharged by the confirmation of this Plan.

“Excess Cash Flow” means, for any period of determination, the remainder of (a) EBITDA for such period, minus (b) the sum, without duplication, of (i) scheduled repayments of principal of the Note made during such period, plus (ii) voluntary prepayments of the Note made during such period, plus (iv) all income taxes paid in cash by Debtor during such period, plus (v) cash interest expense of Debtor during such period.

“Executory Contract” means any prepetition executory contract or unexpired lease governed by § 365 of the Code.

“Exit Financing” means replacement floorplan financing for one or more of the Dealerships or Locations provided pursuant to the Exit Financing Documents, if necessary.

“Exit Financing Documents” means any credit agreement between the Debtors and an Exit Lender providing replacement floorplan financing for one or more of the Dealerships or Locations, and all documents related to that credit agreement.

“Exit Lender” means an entity or financial institution, other than Ford Credit or GM Financial, that provides the Reorganized Debtors with replacement floorplan financing post-confirmation if this Plan is Confirmed under the Restructuring Alternative.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 21 of 66

Page 90: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 19

“Face Amount” means (a) with respect to a particular Claim, (i) if the Claim is listed in the Schedules and the holder of such Claim has not Filed a proof of Claim within the applicable period of limitation fixed by the Bankruptcy Court pursuant to the Bankruptcy Code, the Bankruptcy Rules or other applicable law, the amount of such Claim that is listed in the Schedules as not disputed, contingent or unliquidated; or (ii) if the holder of such Claim has Filed a proof of Claim with the Bankruptcy Court within the applicable period of limitation fixed by the Bankruptcy Court pursuant to the Bankruptcy Code, the Bankruptcy Rules or other applicable law, the liquidated amount stated in such proof of Claim, or such amount as is determined by the Final Order of the Bankruptcy Court; (b) in the case of an Administrative Claim, the liquidated amount set forth in any application Filed with respect thereto, or the amount set forth in the Debtors’ books and records or such amount as is determined pursuant to a Final Order; or (c) in all other cases, zero or such amount as shall be fixed or estimated pursuant to a Final Order.

“FB&T” means First Bank & Trust.

“Fee Claim” means a Claim by a Professional or any other party-in-interest pursuant to §§ 327, 328, 330, 331, 363, 503(b) or 1103 of the Bankruptcy Code or otherwise relating to services performed after the Petition Date and prior to and including the Effective Date.

“File” or “Filed” or “Filing” means file or filed or filing with the Bankruptcy Court in this Case.

“Final Decree” means an Order of the Bankruptcy Court closing the Case.

“Final Distribution” means the last and final Distribution made by the Creditors Trustee to the Creditors Trust Beneficiaries such that the Creditors Trustee may proceed to dissolve and terminate the Creditors Trust.

“Final Order” means an Order or judgment of the Bankruptcy Court entered by the Clerk of the Bankruptcy Court on the docket in the Chapter 11 Cases, which has not been reversed, vacated or stayed and as to which (a) the time to appeal, petition for certiorari or move for a new trial, reargument or rehearing has expired and as to which no appeal, petition for certiorari or other proceedings for a new trial, reargument or rehearing shall then be pending or (b) if an appeal, writ of certiorari, new trial, reargument or rehearing thereof has been sought, such order or judgment of the Bankruptcy Court shall have been affirmed by the highest court to which such order was appealed, or certiorari shall have been denied or a new trial, reargument or rehearing shall have been denied or resulted in no modification of such order, and the time to take any further appeal, petition for certiorari or move for a new trial, reargument or rehearing shall have expired; provided, however, that the possibility that a motion under Rule 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or any analogous rule under the Bankruptcy Rules, may be Filed relating to such order, shall not cause such order not to be a Final Order.

“First Capital Bank” means FirstCapital Bank of Texas, N.A., the prepetition floorplan lender to RAM.

“Ford Credit” means Ford Motor Credit Company, LLC, the prepetition floorplan lender to RDAC, RD Floydada, RD Amarillo, RD Imports, RD Motors and RD Plainview.

“Ford Credit Note” means a $5 million unsecured promissory note. The $5 million

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 22 of 66

Page 91: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 20

unsecured promissory note will have the following terms: (i) 10-year amortization, (ii) 7-year balloon payment, (iii) 6.5% interest per annum, (iv) payment-in-kind interest for 12 months, and (v) payable thereafter from Excess Cash Flow on a quarterly basis. If the Liquidation Alternative is implemented, then Ford Credit’s unsecured claim will be a Disputed Claim, and, to the extent Allowed, Ford Credit’s unsecured claim will be treated in Class 12 and will receive a Pro Rata Share of Creditors Trust Assets. Under the Liquidation Alternative, all Causes of Action against Ford Credit are preserved under this Plan. Ford Credit will not participate in Class 10 or Class 11. The Ford Credit Note will only apply if the Restructuring Alternative is implemented.

“Ford Litigation” means the lawsuit styled Ford Motor Credit Company LLC v. Reagor-Dykes Amarillo, L.P. et al., Civil Action No. 5:18-cv-00186, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (Lubbock Division).

“Ford Motor” means Ford Motor Company.

“General Motors” means General Motors LLC.

“GM Financial” means AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc., d/b/a GM Financial, the prepetition floorplan lender to Snyder.

“GM Financial Secured Note” means secured promissory note with a present value equal to the amount of the value of GM Financial’s Collateral with principal and 3% per annum interest payable upon liquidation of that Collateral. The GM Financial Secured Note will be a Plan Supplement Document.

“General Unsecured Claim” means every Claim against each of the Debtors that is not an Administrative Claim, a Priority Tax Claim, a Priority Non-Tax Claim, a Secured Claim, an Assumed Trade Claim, an Unsecured Claim of Ford Credit, an Unsecured Claim of GM Financial, an Unsecured Claim of Bart Reagor, an Unsecured Claim of Rick Dykes, a Subordinated Claim, or an Interest in the Debtors.

“Auto Investment Group” means the group of investors formed by Henry Resources to own and operate the Reorganized Debtors. Henry Resources will own and control at least 50% of this group.

“Holder” or “holder” means an Entity holding a Claim or Interest.

“IBC Bank” means International Bank of Commerce.

“Impaired” means as set forth in § 1124 of the Bankruptcy Code.

“Interest” means equity in a Debtor, whether or not asserted, by an equity security holder as defined in § 101(17).

“Insider” means any Entity that is either an “affiliate” or an “insider” as those terms are defined in § 101(2) and (31) of the Bankruptcy Code.

“Intercompany Claim” means any Claim that any Debtor holds or asserts against another Debtor.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 23 of 66

Page 92: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 21

“Lien” means any Security Interest, charge against, encumbrance on or other interest in property, the purpose of which is to secure payment of a debt or performance of an obligation.

“Liquidation Alternative” means the process by which all Assets of the Debtors, including all Causes of Action, will be transferred to a Creditors Trust and liquidated in a controlled fashion pursuant to this Plan.

“Litigation Proceeds” means the net proceeds received from Causes of Action, after payment of (a) all fees incurred and expenses reimbursed related to the prosecution, litigation, or liquidation of such Causes of Action and (b) all other Administrative Expenses. Litigation Proceeds received by the Creditors Trust under the Liquidation Alternative will not exceed the Allowed Class 11, Class 12, Class 13, Class 14, and Class 15 Claims.

“Locations” means one or more of the following brick and mortar automobile dealerships operated by the Debtors, as the context requires: Reagor-Dykes Plainview Ford, Reagor-Dykes Chevrolet Floydada, Reagor-Dykes Amarillo Mitsubishi, Reagor-Dykes Mitsubishi Lubbock, Spike Dykes Ford Lamesa, Reagor-Dykes Auto Mall, Reagor-Dykes Auto Mall Downtown, Reagor-Dykes Auto Mall Dallas (permanently closed), Reagor-Dykes Auto Mall Imports, Reagor-Dykes Auto Mall of Midland, Reagor-Dykes Chevrolet Buick GMC, Reagor-Dykes Toyota Plainview, Reagor-Dykes Auto Mall West Lubbock, and Reagor-Dykes Auto Mall Leveland.

“New Equity” means all shares of partnership interests, stock, or membership interests, as the case may be, in the Reorganized Debtors.

“New Equity Infusion” means, collectively, (a) the Plan Sponsor Advances plus (b) the up to $13 million in cash that the Plan Sponsor will invest in the Reorganized Debtors on the Effective Date of this Plan to be used for working capital and as set forth pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Plan.

“New Equity Infusion Documents” means (a) the Plan Sponsor Credit Documents and all other agreements executed or contemplated to be executed in connection with the Plan Sponsor DIP Facility, if same becomes necessary, and (b) all documents executed by and between the Debtors and the Plan Sponsor governing the $13 million cash portion of the New Equity Infusion by the Plan Sponsor pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Plan.

“New Equity Redemption Right” means the redemption right under which the Plan Sponsor may choose, at its sole discretion, to redeem the 10% of the New Equity owned by the Creditors Trust in exchange for payment to the Creditors Trust of the total amount of Allowed Class 11, 12 and 13 Claims entitled to Distributions from the Creditors Trust pursuant to this Plan or each Beneficial Interest in the Creditors Trust on the payment of the value of that Beneficial Interest or an amount agreed by the Holder of the Beneficial Interest.

“Order” means any mandate, precept, command, or direction given by a court.

“Other Secured Claim” means any Secured Claim other than the asserted alleged Secured Claims of Ford Credit, GM Financial, First Capital, FB&T, AIM Bank, and Vista Bank.

“Person” means a person as defined in § 101(41) of the Bankruptcy Code.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 24 of 66

Page 93: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 22

“Petition Date” means, for RD Motors, RD Imports, RD Amarillo, RDAC, RD Plainview, RD Floydada, August 1, 2018, and, for RAM, Snyder and the GP Debtors, November 2, 2018, each the date on which the referenced Cases were commenced.

“Plan” means this Second Amended Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization for Reagor-Dykes, dated [August ____, 2019], including any amendments or modifications hereto.

“Plan Documents” means the agreements, documents and instruments entered into on or as of the Effective Date as contemplated by, and in furtherance of, the Plan (including all documents necessary to consummate the transactions contemplated in the Plan), copies of which shall be available to Creditors upon request to Debtors’ counsel.

“Plan Sponsor” means the entity(ies) owned by Auto Investment Group, SLJ Company, or other investor identified in the Plan Supplement or at the Confirmation Hearing if SLJ Company declines to participate, Rick Dykes, and Ron Blaylock. The Plan Supplement Documents will outline the final equity percentages of ownership in the Plan Sponsor, but the initial equity percentages of ownership in the Plan Sponsor are as follows: (a) Auto Investment Group = 65%; (b) SLJ Company = 20; and (c) Ron Blaylock = 5%.

“Plan Sponsor Advances” means the funds actually advanced by Plan Sponsor to the Debtors under the Plan Sponsor DIP Facility, if any.

“Plan Sponsor DIP Facility” means the debtor-in-possession financing, if any, received by the Debtors pursuant to §§ 105(a) and 364(c)(1) and (2) pursuant to the Plan Sponsor DIP Order.

“Plan Sponsor DIP Order” means the Final Order granting any motion authorizing the Debtors to incur postpetition financing from the Plan Sponsor.

“Plan Sponsor Superpriority Claim” means the Plan Sponsor’s or any member or equity partner of the Plan Sponsor’s Allowed, senior, superpriority Administrative Claim against the Estates, such claim having priority in payment over any other indebtedness and/or obligation now in existence or incurred hereafter by the Debtors and over all Administrative Claims or charges arising in the Chapter 11 Cases and any subsequent Chapter 7 cases including, without limitation, those specified in Bankruptcy Code §§ 362, 503(b), 506(c), 507(b), 726, 1113 or 1114 as set forth in a Plan Sponsor DIP Order, should one be entered.

“Plan Supplement Document(s)” means the documents, including (each as necessary and to the extent applicable under the Restructuring or Liquidation Alternatives) the Schedule of Assumed Contracts and Non-Real Property Leases, the Creditors Trust Agreement, the Creditors Trust Agreement, a description of the Plan Sponsor, the New Equity Infusion Documents, the Exit Financing Documents (if any), and the identity of the individuals who will serve on the Reorganized Debtors’ initial board(s) of directors, all of which shall be included in a notice Filed with the Bankruptcy Court not less than ten (10) days prior to the Voting Deadline, unless otherwise established by the Court in a separate Order. The Plan Supplement Documents may be reviewed via the Bankruptcy Court’s ECF docket for this Case, via www.jndla.com/cases/rdmotors, or requested in writing from the Debtors’ counsel.

“Post-Confirmation Business Plan” means the three-year (3) projections of the income and expenses of the Reorganized Debtors under a Restructuring Alternative (inclusive of a variance of up

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 25 of 66

Page 94: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 23

to 15% in the aggregate), including payroll, professional fees, operational expenses, and payments due to Allowed Administrative Claims, Priority Tax Claims, and Priority Non-Tax Claims attached to the Disclosure Statement as Exhibit B.

“Priority Non-Tax Claim” means a Claim, other than an Administrative Claim or a Priority Tax Claim or the 9019 Lubbock County Claim, entitled to priority in payment under § 507(a).

“Priority Tax Claim” means a Claim entitled to priority in payment pursuant to §§ 502(i) and 507(a)(8).

“Professional” means each Entity that is either (a) employed pursuant to an order of the Court in accordance with §§ 327 or 1103 providing for compensation for services rendered prior to the Effective Date pursuant to §§ 327, 328, 329, 330 331, and 363, (b) seeking compensation and reimbursement pursuant to §§ 503(b)(2) or (4), or (c) awarded compensation and reimbursement by the Bankruptcy Code pursuant to § 503(b)(4) of the Bankruptcy Code inclusive of such Entities’ predecessors, professionals, successors, assigns, affiliates, current officers and directors, principals, shareholders, members, partners, managers, employees, subcontractors, agents, advisory board members, financial advisors, attorneys, accountants, investment bankers, consultants, representatives, management companies, and other professionals, and such entities’ respective heirs, executors, estates, servants, and nominees, in each case in their capacity as such.

“Pro Rata” means, as it relates to Claims, the proportion that an Allowed Claim in a particular Class bears to the aggregate amount of all Allowed Claims in that Class and, as it relates to equity in the Reorganized Debtor, the proportion of New Equity Infusion contributed by one bears to the aggregate amount of all New Equity Infusion contributed by all.

“Pro Rata Share” means, at any time, and, (a) as it relates to Allowed Claims, the proportion that the Face Amount of the Allowed Claim in a particular Class bears to the aggregate Face Amount of all Allowed Claims in such Class and (b) as it relates to equity in the Reorganized Debtors, the proportion that the New Equity Infusion contributed by one party bears to the aggregate amount of the New Equity Infusion contributed by all parties.

“Qualified Retail Lender” means a Retail Lender who casts a ballot accepting this Plan and (i) executes a TT&L Agreement, (ii) provides the Reorganized Debtors with proof of payment of a TT&L/Trade Liability, and (iii) agrees to provide future retail lending on terms mutually acceptable to the Reorganized Debtors and said Retail Lender.

“Qualified Retail Lender Pool” means the up to $.700 million funded on the Effective Date earmarked to reimburse all Qualified Retail Lenders if this Plan goes effective under the Restructuring Alternative.

“Rejection Damages Claim” means any Claim arising from the rejection of any executory contract or unexpired lease, including any Claim of (a) a lessor for damages resulting from the rejection of a lease of real property as any such Claim shall be calculated in accordance with § 502(b)(6) or (b) an employee for damages resulting from the rejection of an employment agreement as any such Claim shall be calculated in accordance with § 502(b)(7). A Rejection Damages Claim shall constitute a General Unsecured Claim treated in Class 11.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 26 of 66

Page 95: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 24

“Rejection Damages Bar Date” means the later of thirty (30) days after such Rejection Damages Claim is Allowed by Final Order or thirty (30) days after the Effective Date.

“Released Parties” means the Debtors, Professionals of the Estates, the Plan Sponsor, and Rick Dykes.

“Releasing Parties” means (a) Holders of Claims who vote to accept the Plan but do not opt out of the releases on the Ballot, (b) Holders of Claims that are Unimpaired under this Plan; (c) Holders of Claims whose vote to accept or reject this Plan is solicited but who do not vote to either accept or reject this Plan; and (d) Holders of Claims who vote to reject the Plan but do not opt out of the releases on the Ballot.

“Reorganized Debtors” means the Debtors, as reorganized as of the Effective Date.

“Restructuring or Restructuring Alternative” means the Debtors’ financial and operational restructuring, the principal terms of which are in the Plan, the Plan Supplement Documents and Plan Documents.

“Retail Lenders” means a retail financing lender that provided prepetition financing to a consumer customer of Reagor-Dykes in the ordinary course of business, inclusive of funds loaned to pay tax, title and license fees on a consumer’s newly purchased vehicle and/or funds loaned to payoff liens on a consumer’s trade-in vehicle.

“Schedules” means the Schedules of Assets and Liabilities Filed by the Debtors under § 521 and Bankruptcy Rule 1007 on October 19, 2018 [Docket Nos. 421, 423, 425, 427, 429 and 431 for RD Motors, RD Plainview, RD Amarillo, RDAC, RD Floydada, RD Imports], on December 17, 2018 [Docket Nos. 720-722 for the GP Debtors], on December 19, 2018 [Docket No. 731 for Snyder] and on December 27, 2018 [Docket No. 750 for RAM], each as amended from time to time.

“Schedule of Assumed Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases” means the list of each Executory Contract not already identified in this Plan for assumption that the Debtors intend to assume on the Effective Date or as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter. For the avoidance of doubt, this Schedule of Assumed Contracts and Unexpired Leases includes all real property leases to be assumed and non-real-property leases and executory contracts to be assumed, and will be Filed as part of the Plan Supplement Documents.

“Secured Claim” means a Claim that arose before the Petition Date, to the extent secured by a lien or other Security Interest on property of the Debtors, which lien is valid, perfected, and enforceable under applicable law and which is not subject to avoidance under the Bankruptcy Code or other applicable non-bankruptcy law and which is duly established in the Case.

“Security Interest” means as defined in § 101(51) of the Bankruptcy Code.

“Toyota” means Gulf States Toyota, Inc.

“TT&L/Trade Liability” means the dollar amount of funds actually advanced by a Retail Lender post-petition to pay the outstanding (a) tax, title and license fees on a vehicle purchased prepetitionand/or (b) amount of a prepetition lien against a trade-in vehicle of a Reagor-Dykes consumer customer.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 27 of 66

Page 96: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 25

“Unclaimed Property” means any Cash or other property unclaimed made in respect of the relevant Allowed Claim or Allowed Interest. Unclaimed Property shall include: (a) checks (and the funds represented thereby) mailed to an address of a holder of an Allowed Claim or Interest and returned as undeliverable without a proper forwarding address; (b) funds for uncashed checks; and (c) checks (and the funds represented thereby) not mailed or delivered because no address to mail or deliver such property was available.

“Unexpired Lease” means a lease to which one of the Debtors is a party that is subject to assumption or rejection under § 365 of the Bankruptcy Code.

“Unimpaired” means not Impaired.

“Unsecured Claim” means a Claim that is not secured by Collateral.

“U.S. Trustee” means the United States Trustee for the Northern District of Texas.

“Voting Deadline” means_____________, 2019, at 4:00 p.m. (prevailing Central Time), which is the deadline established by the Court for the submission of Ballots to counsel for the Debtors in accordance with the Voting Procedures.

“Voting Procedures” means the procedures for submitting a Ballot in which a holder of a Claim votes for or against the Plan as described in the Disclosure Statement.

2.2. Interpretation, Rules of Construction, and Other Terms

(a) Any term used in this Plan that is not defined herein, whether in Article I or elsewhere, but that is used in the Bankruptcy Code or the Bankruptcy Rules, has the meaning assigned to that term in the Bankruptcy Code or the Bankruptcy Rules and shall be construed in accordance with the rules of construction thereunder.

(b) If a conflict between the Plan and the Disclosure Settlement exists, the Plan will govern over the Disclosure Statement. If a conflict between the Plan and any document implementing the Plan exists, the document shall govern. If a conflict between the Plan and the Confirmation Order exists, the Confirmation Order shall govern.

(c) The words “herein,” “hereof,” “hereto,” “hereunder,” and others of similar import, refer to the Plan as a whole and not to any particular article, section, or clause contained in this Plan.

(d) Unless specified otherwise in a particular reference, a reference in this Plan to an article or section is a reference to that article or section of this Plan.

(e) Unless otherwise provided for herein, any reference in this Plan to an existing document or instrument means such document or instrument as it may have been amended, modified, or supplemented from time to time.

(f) As contextually appropriate, each term stated in either the singular or plural shall include both the singular and the plural.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 28 of 66

Page 97: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 26

(g) In addition to the above, the rules of construction set forth in § 102 of the Bankruptcy Code shall apply to this Plan.

(h) Use of the word “include” or any form thereof means “including without limitation” without repeating the same each time used. Further, each definition above includes the plural as the context requires.

(i) All exhibits to this Plan are incorporated into this Plan, and shall be deemed to be included in this Plan, regardless of when Filed with the Court.

2.3. Computation of Time

Unless otherwise specifically stated herein, the provisions of Bankruptcy Rule 9006(a) shall apply in computing any period of time prescribed or allowed herein.

2.4. Governing Law

Unless a rule of law or procedure is supplied by federal law (including the Bankruptcy Code and Bankruptcy Rules) or unless otherwise specifically stated, the laws of the State of Texas, without giving effect to the principles of conflict of laws, shall govern the rights, obligations, construction, and implementation of the Plan, any agreements, documents, instruments, or contracts executed or entered into in connection with the Plan (except as otherwise set forth in those agreements; in which case, the governing law of such agreement shall control); provided, however, that corporate governance matters relating to the Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors, not incorporated in Texas shall be governed by the laws of the state or province of incorporation of the Debtors.

2.5. Reference to Monetary Figures

All references in the Plan to monetary figures shall refer to currency of the United States of America, unless otherwise expressly stated.

ARTICLE IIICLASSIFICATION OF CLAIMS AND INTERESTS

Pursuant to § 1122 of the Bankruptcy Code, and for the purposes of voting and all confirmation matters, except as otherwise provided herein, all Claims against and all Interests in the Debtors shall be classified as set forth in this Article III.

3.1. Administrative Claims and Priority Tax Claims

As provided in § 1123(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, Administrative Claims and Priority Tax Claims shall not be classified; thus, they are excluded from the Classes of Claims and Interests set forth in the Plan.

3.2. Plan Sponsor Superpriority Claim

The Plan Sponsor Superpriority Claim, if any, may be converted to its Pro Rata Share or other amount agreed by the Reorganized Debtor and Plan Sponsor of the 90% of New Equity in the Reorganized Debtors allocated to the Plan Sponsor.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 29 of 66

Page 98: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 27

3.3. Classes of Claims and Interests

A Claim or Interest is in a particular Class only to the extent the Claim or Interest is an Allowed Claim or Allowed Interest as defined herein. For purposes of organization, voting, and all confirmation matters, except as otherwise provided herein, all Claims (except for Administrative Claims and Priority Tax Claims) and Interests shall be classified as follows:

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 30 of 66

Page 99: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 28

Class Type of Allowed Claim or Interest

Treatment: Restructuring

Treatment: Liquidation

Status

1 Priority Non-Tax Claims Cash Distribution Cash Distribution Unimpaired; Deemed to Accept.

1A 9019 Lubbock County Claim

Cash Distribution Cash Distribution Impaired; Entitled to Vote

2 Secured Claim of Ford Credit

Return of Collateral Return of Collateral Impaired; Entitled to Vote

3 Secured Claim of GM Financial

Return of Collateral Return of Collateral Impaired; Entitled to Vote

4 Secured Claim of First Capital Bank

Cash Distributions and/or Return of Collateral

Return of Collateral Impaired; Entitled To Vote

5 Secured Claim of FB&T Cash Distributions and/or Return of Collateral

Return of Collateral Impaired; Entitled to Vote

6 Secured Claim of AIM Bank

Cash Distributions and/or Return of Collateral

Return of Collateral Impaired, Entitled to Vote

7 Secured Claim of Vista Bank

Cash Distributions and/or Return of Collateral

Return of Collateral Impaired, Entitled to Vote

8 Other Secured Claim Cash Distributions, Return of Collateral and/or Restructured Note

Cash Distributions and/or Return of Collateral

Impaired, Entitled to Vote

9 Claims of Qualified Retail Lenders For Payment of TT&L/Trade Liability

Cash from Qualified Retail Lender Pool

N/A Impaired; Entitled to Vote

10 Assumed Trade Claims As Agreed by Reorganized Debtors and Holders of Class 10 Claims

N/A Impaired; Entitled to Vote

11 General Unsecured Claims Distributions from Creditors Trust

Distributions from Creditors Trust

Impaired; Entitled to Vote

12 Unsecured Claims of Ford Credit

Cash Payment; Unsecured Promissory Note

Distributions from Creditor Trust

Impaired, Entitled to Vote

13 Unsecured Claims of GM Financial

Cash Payment Distributions from Creditor Trust

Impaired, Entitled to Vote

14 Unsecured Claims of IBC Bank

No Distributions to Such Claims

Distributions from Creditor Trust

Impaired, Entitled to Vote

15 Unsecured Claims of Bart Reagor and Rick Dykes

No Distributions to Such Claims

Distributions from Creditors Trust

Impaired; Entitled to Vote

16 Intercompany Claims No Distributions to Such Claims

No Distributions to Such Claims

Impaired; Deemed to Reject.

17 Unsecured Subordinated Claims

No Distributions to Such Claims

No Distributions to Such Claims

Impaired; Deemed to Reject

18 Interests in the Debtors Interests shall not be retained

Interests shall not be retained

Impaired; Deemed to Reject.

ARTICLE IVTREATMENT OF CERTAIN UNCLASSIFIED CLAIMS

4.1. Administrative Claims

(a) Time for Filing Administrative Claims.

For any Administrative Claim, other than (i) a Professional Fee Claim, (ii) a liability incurred and payable in the ordinary course of business by the Debtors, or (iii) an Administrative Claim that

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 31 of 66

Page 100: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 29

has been Allowed on or before the Effective Date, an application or request for payment must be Filed with the Bankruptcy Court and served on the Reorganized Debtors or the Creditors Trustee as the case may be, the Office of the United States Trustee, within thirty (30) days after the Effective Date, unless an earlier date is established by the Bankruptcy Court.

Such notice must include at a minimum (i) the name of the holder of the Claim, (ii) the amount of the Claim, and (iii) the basis of the Claim. Failure to timely and properly File and serve the application required under this subsection shall result in the Administrative Claim being forever barred and discharged. Any party in interest may File an objection to an Administrative Claim Filed pursuant to this subsection in accordance with the timeframes and procedures set forth in the Bankruptcy Rules.

(b) Time for Filing Fee Claims.

Each Professional who holds or asserts an Administrative Claim that is a Fee Claim for compensation for services rendered and reimbursement of expenses incurred prior to the Effective Date shall be required to File with the Bankruptcy Court and serve on all parties required to receive such notice a fee application within sixty (60) days after the Effective Date. Failure to timely and properly File and serve a fee application as required under this Section shall result in the Fee Claim being forever barred and discharged. No Fee Claim will be deemed Allowed until an order allowing the Fee Claim becomes a Final Order. Any party in interest may File an objection to a Fee Claim, but any objection must be Filed in accordance with the timeframes and procedures set forth in the Bankruptcy Rules.

(c) Payment of Allowed Administrative Claims.

Except to the extent that any Person entitled to payment of an Administrative Claim agrees otherwise, each Holder of an Allowed Administrative Claim (other than Fee Claims) shall, in full and final satisfaction of any Administrative Claim, receive Cash from the Reorganized Debtors, or the Creditors Trustee as the case may be, in an amount equal to such Allowed Administrative Claim on or as soon as reasonably practicable following the later to occur of: (a) the Effective Date and (b) the date on which such Administrative Claim becomes an Allowed Administrative Claim; provided, however, Allowed Administrative Claims representing liabilities incurred in the ordinary course of business by the Debtors may be paid in full in the ordinary course of business in accordance with the terms and subject to the conditions of any agreements governing, instruments evidencing, or other documents relating to such transactions, provided that either (x) such Allowed Administrative Claims were included in the cash-collateral budgets previously approved by the Bankruptcy Court, or (y) the Bankruptcy Court approves such payments in writing.

Each Professional that intends to File a Fee Claim must provide the Debtors a reasonable estimate of the amount of such Fee Claim at least five (5) days prior to the Confirmation Hearing. On the Effective Date, the Debtors shall transfer Cash in an amount sufficient to pay the Fee Claims reasonably estimated by such Professionals to a trust account maintained by the Debtors’ counsel under the Restructuring Alternative. The Debtors’ counsel shall hold such Cash in trust for the exclusive purpose of paying Allowed Fee Claims, and any excess funds remaining after all Fee Claims have been resolved by a Final Order of the Bankruptcy Court shall be transferred to and retained by the Reorganized Debtors or the Creditors Trustee as the case may be. Each Allowed Fee Claim, after deducting any retainer, shall be paid from such trust account within five (5) Business Days after such Claim is Allowed by a Final Order.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 32 of 66

Page 101: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 30

Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, all fees, expenses and other compensation arising after the Effective Date and due and payable to Professionals retained by the Reorganized Debtors shall be paid by the Reorganized Debtors first from funds remaining from those reserved for fees and then from operations of the Reorganized Debtors should the Restructuring Alternative go effective.

All trade payables and current liabilities of the Debtors, excluding payments to utility service providers, that (a) arise in the ordinary course of business after the Effective Date, including payroll and salaries which have accrued prior to the Effective Date, and (b) otherwise qualify as Administrative Claims, shall be paid by the Reorganized Debtors in the ordinary course of business should the Restructuring Alternative go effective.

4.2. Post-Confirmation Date Fees and Expenses

Except as otherwise specifically provided in the Plan, from and after the Effective Date, the Reorganized Debtors shall, in the ordinary course of business and without further notice or action, order or approval of the Bankruptcy Court, pay in Cash the reasonable legal, professional, or other fees and expenses related to the implementation and consummation of the Plan incurred by the Reorganized Debtors through and including the Effective Date. Upon the Confirmation Date, any requirement that Professionals comply with §§ 327 through 331 and 1103 of the Bankruptcy Code in seeking retention or compensation for services rendered after such date shall terminate, and the Reorganized Debtors may employ and pay any Professional for services rendered or expenses incurred after the Confirmation Date in the ordinary course of business without further notice to any party or action, order, or approval of the Bankruptcy Court.

4.3. Priority Tax Claims

At the election of the Debtors or the Creditors Trustee, as the case may be, each holder of an Allowed Priority Tax Claim will receive from the Reorganized Debtors or the Creditors Trust in full satisfaction of such Allowed Priority Tax Claim (i) payments in Cash, in regular installments over a period ending not later than five (5) years after the Petition Date, of a total value, as of the Effective Date, equal to the Allowed amount of such Claim; (ii) a lesser amount in one Cash payment as may be agreed in writing by such holder; or (iii) such other treatment as may be agreed in writing by such holder; provided, that such agreed treatment may not provide such holder with a return having a present value as of the Effective Date that is greater than the amount of such holder’s Allowed Priority Tax Claim or that is less favorable than the treatment provided to the most favored nonpriority Unsecured Claims under the Plan. The Confirmation Order shall enjoin any holder of an Allowed Priority Tax Claim from commencing or continuing any action or proceeding against any responsible person, officer or director of the Reorganized Debtors that otherwise would be liable to such holder for payment of an Allowed Priority Tax Claim so long as the Debtors or the Creditors Trustee, as the case may be, are in compliance with this Section. So long as the holder of an Allowed Priority Tax Claim is enjoined from commencing or continuing any action or proceeding against any responsible person, officer, or director under this Section or pursuant to the Confirmation Order, the statute of limitations for commencing or continuing any such action or proceeding shall be tolled. To the extent interest is required to be paid on any Allowed Priority Tax Claim, the rate of such interest shall be the rate provided in § 511 of the Bankruptcy Code. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any penalty arising with respect to or in connection with an Allowed Priority Tax Claim shall be treated as a Class 11 General Unsecured Claim.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 33 of 66

Page 102: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 31

4.4. Payment of Statutory Fees

All fees due and payable on or before the Effective Date (i) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1930, as determined by the Bankruptcy Court at the Confirmation Hearing, and (ii) to the United States Trustee, shall be paid by the Debtors on or before the Effective Date. All such fees payable after the Effective Date shall be paid by the Reorganized Debtors or the Creditors Trustee, as the case may be, until entry of the final decree in the Bankruptcy Case.

ARTICLE VTREATMENT OF CLASSIFIED CLAIMS AND INTERESTS

5.1. Class 1 – Allowed Priority Non-Tax Claims (Restructuring or Liquidation Alternative)

(a) Classification. Class 1 consists of Priority Non-Tax Claims.

(b) Treatment. Except to the extent that a Holder of an Allowed Priority Non-Tax Claim agrees to less-favorable treatment, in exchange for full and final satisfaction, settlement, release, and discharge of each Allowed Priority Non-Tax Claim, each Holder of such Allowed Priority Non-Tax Claim shall be paid (a) in full in Cash by the Reorganized Debtors or the Creditors Trustee, as the case may be, on or as reasonably practicable after (i) the Effective Date, (ii) the date on which such Priority Non-Tax Claim against the Debtors becomes an Allowed Priority Non-Tax Claim, or (iii) such other date as may be agreed by the parties or ordered by the Bankruptcy Court; Date or (b) shall receive treatment consistent with the provisions of § 1129(a)(9) of the Bankruptcy Code; provided, however, that Priority Non-Tax Claims that arise in the ordinary course of the Debtors’ business shall be paid by the Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors, as applicable, in the ordinary course of business.

(c) Impairment and Voting. Class 1 is Unimpaired. In accordance with § 1126(f) of the Bankruptcy Code, each Holder of a Class 1 Claim is presumed to accept this Plan; therefore, no such Holder is entitled to vote to accept or reject this Plan.

5.1A. Class 1A – Allowed 9019 Lubbock County Claim (Restructuring or Liquidation Alternative)

(d) Classification. Class 1A consists of the Allowed 9019 Lubbock County Claim pursuant to the 9019 Order.

(e) Treatment. Consistent with the terms of the 9019 Order, except to the extent that the Holder of the Allowed 9019 Lubbock County Claim agrees to less-favorable treatment, in exchange for full and final satisfaction, settlement, release, and discharge of the 9019 Lubbock County Claim, Class 1A shall be paid in full in Cash by the Reorganized Debtors or the Creditors Trustee, as the case may be, as soon reasonably practicable when funds are available after the Effective Date.

(f) Impairment and Voting. Class 1A is Impaired and entitled to vote to accept or reject the Plan.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 34 of 66

Page 103: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 32

5.2. Class 2 – Secured Claim of Ford Credit (Restructuring or Liquidation Alternative)

(a) Claim and Lien Determination. The amount, validity, extent, value, and priority of the Allowed Secured Class 2 Claim under § 506 of the Bankruptcy Code will be determined by the Bankruptcy Court after the Effective Date or pursuant to an agreement between the Reorganized Debtors and the Holder of the Class 2 Claim. Any Deficiency Claim or other Unsecured Claim of the Holder of the Class 2 Claim shall be treated in Class 12.

(b) Treatment. Ford Credit’s Class 2 Claim will be paid in full by delivery of the Collateral securing such Allowed Secured Claim.

(c) Impairment and Voting. Class 2 is Impaired under the Plan. Class 2 includes only the Secured Claim of Ford Credit. The Holder of a Class 2 Claim is entitled to vote to accept or reject the Plan. Under the Liquidation Alternative, all Causes of Action against Ford Credit are preserved under the Plan.

5.3. Class 3 — Secured Claim of GM Financial (Restructuring or Liquidation Alternative)

(a) Claim and Lien Determination. The amount, validity, extent, value, and priority of the Allowed Secured Class 3 Claim under § 506 of the Bankruptcy Code will be determined by the Bankruptcy Court after the Effective Date or pursuant to an agreement between the Reorganized Debtors and the Holder of the Class 3 Claim. Any Deficiency Claim or other Unsecured Claim of the Holder of the Class 3 Claim shall be treated in Class 13.

(b) Treatment. GM Financial’s Class 3 Claim will be paid in full by delivery of the Collateral securing such Allowed Secured Claim.

(c) Impairment and Voting. Class 3 is Impaired under the Plan. Class 3 includes only the Secured Claim of GM Financial. The Holder of a Class 3 Claim is entitled to vote to accept or reject the Plan. Under the Liquidation Alternative, all Causes of Action against GM Financial are preserved under this Plan.

5.4. Class 4 — Secured Claim of First Capital Bank (Restructuring or Liquidation Alternative)

(a) Claim and Lien Determination. The amount, validity, extent, value, and priority of the Allowed Secured Class 4 Claim under § 506 of the Bankruptcy Code will be determined by the Bankruptcy Court after the Effective Date or pursuant to an agreement between the Reorganized Debtors and the Holder of the Class 4 Claim. Any Deficiency Claim or other Unsecured Claim of the Holder of the Class 4 Claim shall be included as a Class 11 General Unsecured Claim.

(b) Treatment: Restructuring Alternative. The Class 4 Claim will be satisfied in full and final satisfaction, settlement, release, and discharge of such Class 4 Claim (a) pursuant to an agreement between the Reorganized Debtors and the Holder of Class 4 Claim or (b) if no agreement is reached, at the Reorganized Debtors’ sole and absolute option, (i) the net proceeds from

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 35 of 66

Page 104: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 33

the liquidation of collateral after payment of all fees incurred and expenses reimbursed related to the liquidation of such collateral, or (ii) surrender of collateral.

(c) Treatment: Liquidation Alternative. In full and final satisfaction of all secured Class 4 claims against the Debtors, First Capital Bank will receive surrender of the Collateral.

(d) Impairment and Voting. Class 4 is Impaired under the Plan. Class 4 includes only the Secured Claim of First Capital Bank. Each Holder of a Class 4 Claim is entitled to vote to accept or reject the Plan. All Causes of Action against First Capital Bank are preserved under the Plan.

5.5. Class 5 — Secured Claim of First Bank & Trust (Restructuring or Liquidation Alternative)

(a) Claim and Lien Determination. The amount, validity, extent, value, and priority, of the Allowed Secured Class 5 Claim under § 506 of the Bankruptcy Code will be determined by the Bankruptcy Court after the Effective Date or pursuant to an agreement between the Reorganized Debtors and the Holder of the Class 5 Claim. Any Deficiency Claim or other Unsecured Claim of the Holder of the Class 5 Claim shall be included as a Class 11 General Unsecured Claim.

(b) Treatment: Restructuring Alternative. The Class 5 Claim will be satisfied in full and final satisfaction, settlement, release, and discharge of such Class 5 Claim (a) pursuant to an agreement between the Reorganized Debtors and the Holder of Class 5 Claim or (b) if no agreement is reached, at the Reorganized Debtors’ sole and absolute option, (i) the net proceeds from the liquidation of collateral after payment of all fees incurred and expenses reimbursed related to the liquidation of such collateral, or (ii) surrender of collateral.

(c) Treatment: Liquidation Alternative. In full and final satisfaction of all secured Class 5 claims against the Debtors, FB&T will receive surrender of the Collateral.

(d) Impairment and Voting. Class 5 is Impaired under the Plan. Class 5 includes only the Secured Claim of FB&T. Each Holder of a Class 5 Claim is entitled to vote to accept or reject the Plan. All Causes of Action against FB&T are preserved under the Plan.

5.6. Class 6 — Secured Claim of AIM Bank (Restructuring or Liquidation Alternative)

(a) Claim and Lien Determination. The amount, validity, extent, value, and priority of the Allowed Secured Class 6 Claim under § 506 of the Bankruptcy Code will be determined by the Bankruptcy Court after the Effective Date or pursuant to an agreement between the Reorganized Debtors and the Holder of the Class 6 Claim. Any Deficiency Claim or other Unsecured Claim of the Holder of the Class 6 Claim shall be included as a Class 11 General Unsecured Claim.

(b) Treatment: Restructuring Alternative. The Class 6 Claim will be satisfied in full and final satisfaction, settlement, release, and discharge of such Class 6 Claim (a) pursuant to an agreement between the Reorganized Debtors and the Holder of Class 6 Claim or (b) if no agreement is reached, at the Reorganized Debtors’ sole and absolute option, (i) the net proceeds from

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 36 of 66

Page 105: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 34

the liquidation of collateral after payment of all fees incurred and expenses reimbursed related to the liquidation of such collateral, or (ii) surrender of collateral.

(c) Treatment: Liquidation Alternative. In full and final satisfaction of all secured Class 6 claims against the Debtors, AIM Bank will receive surrender of the Collateral.

(d) Impairment and Voting. Class 6 is Impaired under the Plan. Class 6 includes only the Secured Claim of AIM Bank. Each Holder of a Class 6 Claim is entitled to vote to accept or reject the Plan. All Causes of Action against AIM Bank are preserved under the Plan.

5.7. Class 7 — Secured Claim of Vista Bank (Restructuring or Liquidation Alternative)

(a) Claim and Lien Determination. The amount, validity, extent, value, and priority of the Allowed Secured Class 7 Claim under § 506 of the Bankruptcy Code will be determined by the Bankruptcy Court after the Effective Date or pursuant to an agreement between the Reorganized Debtors and the Holder of the Class 7 Claim. Any Deficiency Claim or other Unsecured Claim of the Holder of the Class 7 Claim shall be included as a Class 11 General Unsecured Claim.

(b) Treatment: Restructuring Alternative. The Class 7 Claim will be satisfied in full and final satisfaction, settlement, release, and discharge of such Class 7 Claim (a) pursuant to an agreement between the Reorganized Debtors and the Holder of Class 7 Claim or (b) if no agreement is reached, at the Reorganized Debtors’ sole and absolute option, (i) the net proceeds from the liquidation of collateral after payment of all fees incurred and expenses reimbursed related to the liquidation of such collateral, or (ii) surrender of collateral.

(c) Treatment: Liquidation Alternative. In full and final satisfaction of all secured Class 7 claims against the Debtors, Vista Bank will receive surrender of the Collateral.

(d) Impairment and Voting. Class 7 is Impaired under the Plan. Class 7 includes only the Secured Claim of Vista Bank. Each Holder of a Class 7 Claim is entitled to vote to accept or reject the Plan. All Causes of Action against Vista Bank are preserved under the Plan.

5.8. Class 8 — Other Secured Claims (Restructuring or Liquidation Alternative)

(a) Claim and Lien Determination. The amount, validity, extent, value, and priority of the Allowed Other Secured Class 8 Claim under § 506 of the Bankruptcy Code will be determined by the Bankruptcy Court after the Effective Date or pursuant to an agreement between the Reorganized Debtors and the Holder of a Class 8 Claim. Any Deficiency Claim or other Unsecured Claim of the Holder of the Class 8 Claim shall be included as a Class 11 General Unsecured Claim.

(b) Treatment: Restructuring Alternative. Holders of Allowed Class 8 Claims, if any, shall be designated as Class 8A, Class 8B et seq. and shall be satisfied at the Reorganized Debtors’ option by (i) payment of such Allowed Secured Claim in full in cash, including interest, if applicable, as required under § 506(b) of the Bankruptcy Code; (ii) delivery of the Collateral securing such Allowed Secured Claim; or (iii) issuance of a restructured note with a present value equal to the amount of the

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 37 of 66

Page 106: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 35

value of their Collateral with interest payable from net profits of the Reorganized Debtors at a rate of 3% annually, and payable in full in ten (10) years.

(c) Treatment: Liquidation Alternative. Holders of Allowed Class 8 Claims, if any, shall be designated as Class 8A, Class 8B et seq. and will be paid by surrender of the Collateral.

(d) Impairment and Voting. Class 8 is Impaired under the Plan. Class 8 includes only Secured Claims not otherwise classified under this Plan. Each Holder of a Class 8 Claim is entitled to vote to accept or reject the Plan. All Causes of Action against any holder of a Class 8 are preserved under this Plan.

5.9. Class 9 — Claims of Qualified Retail Lenders for Payment of TT&L/Trade Liability (Restructuring Alternative Only)6

(a) Class 9 Eligibility. A Retail Lender who accepts the Plan and, on such accepting Ballot, indicates its agreement to (i) execute a TT&L Agreement, (ii) provide the Reorganized Debtors with proof of payment of a TT&L/Trade Liability, and (iii) provide future retail lending on terms mutually acceptable to the Reorganized Debtors will be given a Class 9 Claim for the amount payment pursuant to (a)(ii) above.

(b) Treatment. As full and final satisfaction, settlement, release, and discharge of each Class 9 Claim, each Holder of a Class 9 Claim will receive is Pro Rata Share of the Qualified Retail Lender Pool.

(c) Impairment and Voting. Class 9 is Impaired under the Plan. Class 9 includes only the Claims of Qualified Retail Lenders. Each Holder of a Class 9 Claim is entitled to vote to accept or reject the Plan; however, any Retail Lender who does not qualify for a Class 9 Claim but asserts a Claim against the Debtors will have that Claim treated as a Class 11 Claim. All Causes of Action against any Retail Lender are preserved under the Plan.

5.10. Class 10 — Unsecured Assumed Trade Claims (Restructuring Alternative Only)7

(a) Class 10 Eligibility. The Plan Sponsor may, not less than ten (10) days before the Voting Deadline, identify certain Unsecured Claims held by Creditors whose future cooperation the Plan Sponsor deems critical to the success of the business operations of the Reorganized Debtors and designate each an Assumed Trade Claim. Claims denominated as Assumed Trade Claims by the Plan Sponsor will be treated in Class 10.

(b) Treatment. As full and final satisfaction, settlement, release, and discharge of such Class 10 Claim, each Holder of a Class 10 Claim will receive payment in full, over time, through

6 Class 9 is not an option under the Liquidation Alternative; all Claims that could qualify as Claims of Qualified Retail Lenders under the Restructuring Alternative will be treated in Class 11 under the Liquidation Alternative.

7 Class 10 is not an option under the Liquidation Alternative; all Claims that could qualify as Assumed Trade Claims will be treated in Class 11 under the Liquidation Alternative.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 38 of 66

Page 107: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 36

the assumption of the indebtedness underlying the Allowed Class 10 Claim payable on terms to be agreed by each Holder of an Assumed Trade Claim and the Reorganized Debtors.

(c) Impairment and Voting. Class 10 is Impaired under the Plan. Class 10 includes only Unsecured Assumed Trade Claims. The Holders of Class 10 Claims are entitled to vote to accept or reject the Plan. All Causes of Action against any holder of a Class 10 Claim are preserved under the Plan.

5.11. Class 11 — General Unsecured Claims (Restructuring or Liquidation Alternative)

(a) Treatment: Restructuring Alternative. As full and final satisfaction, settlement, release, and discharge of each Class 11 Claim against the Debtors, each member of the Plan Sponsor, and the Reorganized Debtors, each Holder of a Class 11 Claim shall be satisfied by Pro Rata Share (calculated together with Allowed Claims in Class 12 and Class 13) of Distributions from Creditors Trust Assets, provided however, that after distributions to holders of Allowed Class 11 Unsecured Claims reach a total of $7.5 million, the Creditors’ Trust will surrender this 10% equity to the Reorganized Debtors.

(b) Treatment: Liquidation Alternative. As full and final satisfaction, settlement, release, and discharge of each Class 11 Claim against the Debtors, each Holder of a Class 11 Claim shall be satisfied by Pro Rata Share (calculated together with Allowed Claims in Classes 12, 13, 14 and 15) of Distributions from the Creditors Trust Assets.

(c) Impairment and Voting. Class 11 is Impaired under the Plan. Class 11 includes only General Unsecured Claims. The Holders of Class 11 Claims are entitled to vote to accept or reject the Plan. All Causes of Action against any holder of a Class 11 Claim are preserved under this Plan.

5.12. Class 12 — Unsecured Claims of Ford Credit (Restructuring or Liquidation Alternative)

(a) Claim Determination: Restructuring Alternative. Ford Credit shall have an Allowed Class 12 Claim of $7 million.

(b) Claim Determination: Liquidation Alternative. Ford Credit’s Unsecured Claim is a Disputed Claim. Under the Liquidation Alternative, all Causes of Action against Ford Credit are reserved under the Plan. Until such Causes of Action are resolved on a final basis by litigation or settlement by the Creditors Trustee, the Allowed amount of Ford Credit’s Unsecured Claim, if any, is unknown.

(c) Treatment: Restructuring Alternative. As full and final satisfaction, settlement, release, and discharge of such Class 12 Claims against the Debtors, each member of the Plan Sponsor, and the Reorganized Debtors, Ford Credit’s Class 12 Claim will be paid from Excess Cash Flow and only after payment of all Allowed Administrative Expenses by (i) a $1 million cash payment in 2020, (ii) a $1 million cash payment in 2021, and (iii) issuance of the Ford Credit Note.

**FORD CREDIT ONLY GETS A RELEASE AND PAYMENT OF $2 MM CASH AND $5 MM NOTE IF (A) THE RESTRUCTURING ALTERNATIVE IS APPROVED BY THE BANKRUPTCY COURT AND THE EFFECTIVE

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 39 of 66

Page 108: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 37

DATE FOR SUCH ALTERNATIVE OCCURS, (B) FORD CREDIT VOTES IN FAVOR OF THE PLAN, AND (C) FORD MOTOR AGREES TO THE ASSUMPTION OF THE DEALER AGREEMENTS OR THE ISSUANCE OF NEW DEALER AGREEMENTS ON TERMS AT LEAST AS FAVORABLE AS THE TERMS IN THE CURRENT DEALER AGREEMENTS.

(d) Treatment: Liquidation Alternative. Ford Credit’s Unsecured Claim is a Disputed Claim. To the extent Allowed, Ford Credit’s Unsecured Claim will be treated in Class 12 and paid as follows: In full and final satisfaction and release of all Ford Credit’s Unsecured Claims against the Debtors, Ford Credit will receive its Pro Rata Share (calculated together with Allowed Claims in Classes 11, 13, 14, and 15) of Distributions from the Creditors Trust Assets.

(e) Impairment and Voting. Class 12 is Impaired under the Plan. Class 12 includes only the Unsecured Claim of Ford Credit. The Holders of Class 12 Claims are entitled to vote to accept or reject the Plan. All Causes of Action against Ford Credit are preserved under the Liquidation Alternative of the Plan or if Ford Credit does not satisfy the conditions precedent to the payment of the Class 12 Claim under the Restructuring Alternative.

5.13. Class 13 — Unsecured Claims of GM Financial (Restructuring or Liquidation Alternative)

(a) Treatment: Restructuring Alternative. As full and final satisfaction, settlement, release, and discharge of such Class 13 Claims against the Debtors, each member of the Plan Sponsor, and the Reorganized Debtors, GM Financial will receive (i) $750,000 from Excess Cash Flow by the later of (x) 180 days after the Effective Date and (y) payment of all Allowed Administrative Expenses and (ii) another $750,000 from Excess Cash Flow no later than twelve (12) months after the first payment of $750,000 to GM Financial.

***GM FINANCIAL ONLY GETS A RELEASE AND THE $1.5 MM PAYMENT IF (A) THE RESTRUCTURING ALTERNATIVE IS APPROVED BY THE BANKRUPTCY COURT AND THE EFFECTIVE DATE FOR SUCH ALTERNATIVE OCCURS, (B) GM FINANCIAL VOTES IN FAVOR OF THE PLAN, (C) GM FINANCIAL PROVIDES FLOOR-PLAN FINANCING TO THE REORGANIZED DEBTORS ON TERMS AND CONDITIONS REASONABLY ACCEPTABLE TO THE REORGANIZED DEBTORS; AND (D) GENERAL MOTORS AGREES TO THE ASSUMPTION OF THE DEALER AGREEMENT OR THE ISSUANCE OF NEW DEALER AGREEMENT ON TERMS AT LEAST AS FAVORABLE AS THE TERMS IN THE CURRENT DEALER AGREEMENT.

(b) Treatment: Liquidation Alternative. GM Financial’s Unsecured Claim will be a Disputed Claim, and, to the extent Allowed, GM Financial’s Class 13 Claim will receive its Pro Rata Share (calculated together with Allowed Claims in Classes 11, 12, 14, and 15) of Distributions from the Creditor Trust Assets. All Causes of Action against GM Financial are reserved under the Liquidation Alternative in this Plan.

(c) Impairment and Voting. Class 13 is Impaired under the Plan. Class 13 includes only the Unsecured Claim of GM Financial. The Holders of Class 13 Claims are entitled to vote to accept or reject the Plan. All Causes of Action against GM Financial are preserved under the Liquidation Alternative of the Plan or if GM Financial does not satisfy the conditions precedent to the payment of the Class 13 Claim under the Restructuring Alternative.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 40 of 66

Page 109: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 38

5.14. Class 14 — Unsecured Claims of IBC Bank (Restructuring or Liquidation Alternative)

(a) Treatment: Restructuring Alternative. All prepetition claims of IBC Bank against the Debtors, directly or indirectly, will be forgiven, and there will be no Distributions to Claims in Class 14.

(b) Treatment: Liquidation Alternative. In full and final satisfaction and release of all of IBC Bank’s Claims against the Debtors, IBC Bank will receive its Pro Rata Share (calculated together with Allowed Claims in Classes 11, 12, 13, and 15) of Distributions from the Creditor Trust Assets.

(c) Impairment and Voting. Class 14 is Impaired under the Plan. Class 14 includes only the Unsecured Claim of IBC Bank. The Holders of Class 14 Claims are entitled to vote to accept or reject the Plan.

5.15. Class 15 — Unsecured Claims of Bart Reagor and Rick Dykes (Restructuring or Liquidation Alternative)

(a) Treatment: Restructuring Alternative. The Holders of Class 15 Claims are not entitled to receive any Distribution under the Plan.

(b) Treatment: Liquidation Alternative. Allowed Claims in Class 15 will receive their Pro Rata Share (calculated together with Allowed Claims in Classes 11, 12, 13, and 15) of Distributions from the Creditor Trust Assets.

(c) Impairment and Voting. Class 15 includes only the Unsecured Claims of Bart Reagor and Rick Dykes, and such Claims are Impaired under the Plan and entitled to vote.8

5.16. Class 16 — Intercompany Claims (Restructuring or Liquidation Alternative)

(a) Treatment Restructuring or Liquidation Alternative. On the Effective Date, all Intercompany Claims shall be cancelled and discharged. The Holders of Class 16 Claims are not entitled to receive any Distribution under the Plan.

(b) Impairment and Voting. Class 16 consists of all Intercompany Claims. Holders in Class 16 are not entitled to a Distribution under the Plan; therefore, they are deemed to have rejected the Plan under § 1126(g) of the Bankruptcy Code.

5.17. Class 17 — Subordinated Unsecured Claims (Restructuring or Liquidation Alternative)

(a) Treatment: Restructuring or Liquidation Alternative. The Holders of Class 17 Claims are not entitled to receive any Distribution under the Plan.

8 Because such Claims will receive no Distribution under the Plan, Class 15 will be deemed to have rejected the Plan under § 1126(g) of the Bankruptcy Code if the Plan is Confirmed pursuant to the Restructuring Alternative.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 41 of 66

Page 110: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 39

(b) Impairment and Voting. Class 17 includes only Unsecured Claims that are subordinated pursuant to contractual, legal, or equitable subordination, whether arising under general principles of equitable subordination, § 510(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, or otherwise. Because Class 17 Claims are disallowed in full and will receive no Distribution under the Plan, Class 17 is deemed to have rejected the Plan under § 1126(g) of the Bankruptcy Code.

5.18. Class 18 — Holders of Allowed Interests in the Debtors (Restructuring or Liquidation Alternative)

(a) Treatment Restructuring or Liquidation Alternative. On the Effective Date, all Interests shall be cancelled and discharged.

(b) Impairment and Voting. Class 18 consists of all Interests. Holders in Class 18 are not entitled to a Distribution under the Plan; therefore, they are deemed to have rejected the Plan under § 1126(g) of the Bankruptcy Code.

ARTICLE VINON-VOTING AND UNIMPAIRED CLASSES

6.1. Impaired/Unimpaired Classes

Holders of Allowed Claims in Class 1 are Unimpaired; therefore, they are presumed to accept the Plan. Holders of Claims in Classes 1A, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15 are Impaired under the Plan; therefore, they are entitled to vote to accept or reject the Plan. Holders of Allowed Claims in Class 15 will receive no Distributions under the Plan on account of said Claims if the Plan is Confirmed under the Restructuring Alternative, and Holders of Allowed Claims in Class 16 and 17 and Interests in Class 18 are Impaired and will receive no Distributions under the Plan on account of said Claims or Interests; therefore, Classes 16, 17 and 18 are presumed to reject the Plan under § 1126(g) of the Bankruptcy Code. The Debtors need not solicit acceptances of the Plan from Holders of Claims in Class 1. Except as otherwise provided in the Plan, nothing under the Plan shall affect the Debtors’ rights regarding any Claim that is not Impaired, including all rights in respect of legal and equitable defenses to or setoffs or recoupments against any such Claims.

6.2. Controversy Concerning Impairment

If a controversy arises as to whether any Claim or Interest, or any class of Claims or Interests, is impaired under the Plan, the Bankruptcy Court shall, after notice and a hearing, determine such controversy.

6.3. Elimination of Vacant Classes

Any Class of Claims or Interests that does not have a Holder of an Allowed Claim or Allowed Interest or a Claim or Interest temporarily Allowed by the Bankruptcy Court as of the date of the Confirmation Hearing shall be deemed eliminated from the Plan for purposes of voting and for purposes of determining acceptance or rejection of the Plan by such Class pursuant to § 1129(a)(8) of the Bankruptcy Code.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 42 of 66

Page 111: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 40

6.4. Subordinated Claims

Except as expressly provided herein, the allowance, classification, and treatment of Allowed Claims and Interests and the respective distributions and treatments under the Plan take into account and conform to the relative priority and rights of the Claims and Interests in each Class in connection with any contractual, legal, and equitable-subordination rights relating thereto, whether arising under general principles of equitable subordination, § 510(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, or otherwise. Pursuant to § 510 of the Bankruptcy Code, the Reorganized Debtors or the Creditor Trustee, as the case may be, reserve the right to re-classify any Allowed Claim or Interest in accordance with any contractual, legal, or equitable subordination relating thereto.

ARTICLE VIIMEANS FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLAN: RESTRUCTURING

ALTERNATIVE

7.1. Continued Corporate Existence

The Debtors shall each continue to exist after the Effective Date as Reorganized Debtors in accordance with applicable laws of the jurisdiction in which each is incorporated or organized. On or after the Effective Date, the Reorganized Debtors may, in each of their sole and absolute discretion, take such action as permitted by applicable law and each of the Reorganized Debtors’ organizational documents as the Reorganized Debtors may determine is reasonable and appropriate.

7.2. Operations Between the Confirmation Date and the Effective Date

During the period from the Confirmation Date through and until the Effective Date, the Debtors shall continue to operate their business as debtors-in-possession, subject to the oversight of the Bankruptcy Court as provided in the Bankruptcy Code, the Bankruptcy Rules, and all orders of the Bankruptcy Court that are then in full force and effect.

7.3. Implementation Transactions on or Prior to the Effective Date by Reorganized Debtors or Creditor Trust – As Applicable

(a) New Equity Infusion. On the Effective Date, the Reorganized Debtors will execute the New Equity Infusion Documents and receive the up to $13 million in cash and financing from the Plan Sponsor to be used for working capital and to pay Allowed Claims pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Plan and the Post-Confirmation Business Plan.

(b) Issuance of New Equity. On the Effective Date, the Interests in the Debtors shall be cancelled and discharged, and the Reorganized Debtors are authorized to issue or cause to be issued the New Equity with 90% of the New Equity issued to the Plan Sponsor in exchange for the contribution of the New Equity Infusion, and 10% of the New Equity placed into the Creditors Trust, subject to the New Equity Redemption Right. The issuance of the New Equity and the Distribution thereof shall be exempt from registration under applicable securities laws pursuant to § 1145(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.

(c) Post-Confirmation Business Plan. The Debtors, with the support and input of the Plan Sponsor, have prepared three-year projections of the income and expenses of the

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 43 of 66

Page 112: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 41

Reorganized Debtors (inclusive of a variance of up to 15% in the aggregate) including payroll, professional fees, operational expenses, and payments due to Allowed Administrative Claims, Priority Tax Claims, and Priority Non-Tax Claims pursuant to this Plan. The Post-Confirmation Business Plan is attached to the Disclosure Statement as Exhibit B.

(d) Exit Financing, If Necessary. If the Reorganized Debtors need to find replacement floorplan financing, then the Reorganized Debtors are authorized to obtain Exit Financing and execute and deliver Exit Financing Documents to an Exit Lender on the Effective Date. This Exit Financing will be from an entity or financial institution in an amount sufficient to allow the Reorganized Debtors to execute the Ford Credit Secured Note and/or the GM Financial Secured Note. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, it is anticipated that the obligations of the Reorganized Debtors under such Exit Financing Documents shall be secured by a first-priority lien in and on substantially all of the assets of the Dealerships or Locations to which such financing relates, subject only to certain customary permitted liens.

(e) Restructuring-Alternative Transactions. On the Effective Date, the Reorganized Debtors shall execute the Creditors Trust Agreement and shall execute and deliver to the Plan Sponsor and, if necessary, to an Exit Lender, documents necessary to implement the Plan, including, without limitation, (i) the New Equity Infusion Documents and (ii) Exit Financing Documents, if necessary. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, these documents shall provide that (i) the obligations of the Reorganized Debtors to the Plan Sponsor shall be secured by a first-priority lien in and on substantially all of the Reorganized Debtors’ assets, potentially subject to a superior lien of a floorplan lender in specified Collateral of the Dealerships or Locations to which such floorplan financing relates. The issuance of these documents shall be exempt from registration under applicable securities laws pursuant to § 1145(a) of the Bankruptcy Code. Further, on the Effective Date, or as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter, the Reorganized Debtors may also take all actions as may be necessary or appropriate to effect any transaction described in, approved by, contemplated by or necessary to effectuate the Plan, including (i) the execution and delivery of appropriate agreements or other documents of merger, consolidation, restructuring, conversion, disposition, transfer, dissolution, or liquidation containing terms that are consistent with the terms of the Plan and that satisfy the applicable requirements of applicable law and any other terms to which the applicable Entities may agree; (ii) the execution and delivery of appropriate instruments of transfer, assignment, assumption, or delegation of any asset, property, right, liability, debt, or obligation on terms consistent with the terms of the Plan and having other terms for which the applicable parties agree; (iii) the filing of appropriate certificates or articles of incorporation, reincorporation, merger, consolidation, conversion, or dissolution pursuant to applicable state law; and (iv) all other actions that the applicable Entities determine to be necessary or appropriate, including making filings or recordings that may be required by applicable law.

(f) Corporate Action. Upon the Effective Date, or as soon thereafter as is reasonably practicable, all actions contemplated by the Plan shall be deemed authorized and approved in all respects, including: (a) execution and entry into the New Equity Infusion Documents and, if necessary, Exit Financing Documents; (b) Distribution of the New Equity Interests; (c) selection of the directors and officers for the Reorganized Debtors; (d) implementation of the restructuring transactions contemplated by this Plan, as applicable; and (e) all other actions contemplated by the Plan (whether to occur before on or after the Effective Date). All matters provided for in the Plan involving the corporate structure of the Reorganized Debtors, and any corporate action required by one of the Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors in connection with the

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 44 of 66

Page 113: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 42

Plan shall be deemed to have occurred and shall be in effect, without any requirement of further action by the directors or officers of the Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors. On or before the Effective Date, the appropriate officers of the Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors (as applicable) shall be authorized and directed to issue, execute, and deliver the agreements, documents, securities, and instruments contemplated by and consistent with the Plan (or necessary or desirable to effect the transactions contemplated by the Plan) in the name of and on behalf of the Reorganized Debtors, including the New Equity Infusion Documents and, if necessary, Exit Financing Documents, and any and all related and ancillary agreements, documents, and filings, New Equity Interests, or Creditor Trust, as applicable, and any and all other agreements, documents, securities, and instruments relating to the foregoing. The authorizations and approvals contemplated by this Article shall be effective notwithstanding any requirements under non-bankruptcy law. The issuance of the New Equity Interests shall be exempt from the requirements of section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (pursuant to Rule 16b-3 promulgated thereunder) with respect to any acquisition of such securities by an officer or director (or a director deputized for purposes thereof) as of the Effective Date.

(g) New Certificates of Incorporation and New By-Laws. On or around the Effective Date, the Reorganized Debtors will File each of their respective New Certificates of Incorporation with the applicable Secretary of State and/or other applicable authorities in its state. Pursuant to § 1123(a)(6) of the Bankruptcy Code, the New Certificates of Incorporation will prohibit the issuance of non-voting equity securities. After the Effective Date, the Reorganized Debtors may amend and restate its New Certificate of Incorporation and New By-Laws and other constituent documents as permitted by the laws of its state.

(h) Cancellation of Prepetition Interests. Except as expressly provided herein, on the Effective Date, all notes, instruments, certificates evidencing Interests in the Debtors shall be deemed surrendered and cancelled and the Debtors’ obligations thereunder shall be discharged.

(i) Release of Liens. Upon full payment or other satisfaction of Secured Claims pursuant to this Plan, the Holders of such Secured Claims shall deliver to the Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors, or Creditor Trustee, as applicable, any Collateral or other property of the Debtors held by such Holder, together with any termination statements, instruments of satisfaction, or releases of all Security Interests with respect to Allowed Secured Claims that may be reasonably required to terminate any related financing statements, mortgages, mechanics’ or other statutory liens, or lis pendens, or similar interests or documents. The Reorganized Debtors are authorized to file any such UCC-3 termination statement(s) as may be necessary to fulfill the terms of this Section.

(j) Directors and Officers of the Reorganized Debtors. As of the Effective Date, a new initial board of directors of the Reorganized Debtor shall be appointed by the Reorganized Debtors. Pursuant to § 1129(a)(5) of the Bankruptcy Code, the initial board of directors for the Reorganized Debtors will be as identified in the Plan Supplement Documents. To the extent any such director or officer is an “insider” as such term is defined in § 101(31) of the Bankruptcy Code, the nature of any compensation to be paid to such director or officer will also be disclosed in the Plan Supplement Documents. Each such director and officer shall serve from and after the Effective Date pursuant to the terms of the organizational and other constituent documents of the Reorganized Debtors.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 45 of 66

Page 114: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 43

(k) Effectuating Documents; Further Transactions. Entry of the Confirmation Order shall constitute authorization for the Reorganized Debtors and the Debtors, pursuant to § 1123(a)(5)(D), and the officers and members of the new board of directors to issue, execute, deliver, File, or record such contracts, securities, instruments, releases, and other agreements or documents and take such actions as may be necessary or appropriate to effectuate, implement, and further evidence the terms and conditions of the Plan and the securities issued pursuant to the Plan, in the name of and on behalf of the Reorganized Debtors, without the need for any approvals, authorization or consents except those expressly required pursuant to the Plan.

(l) Exemption from Certain Taxes and Fees. Pursuant to § 1146(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, any transfers of property pursuant hereto shall not be subject to any stamp tax or other similar tax or governmental assessment in the United States, and the Confirmation Order shall direct and be deemed to direct the appropriate state or local governmental officials or agents to forgo the collection of any such tax or governmental assessment and to accept for filing and recordation instruments or other documents pursuant to such transfers of property without the payment of any such tax or governmental assessment. Such exemption specifically applies, without limitation, to (i) the creation of any mortgage, deed-of-trust, lien, or other Security Interest, (ii) the making or assignment of any lease or sublease, (iii) any restructuring transaction authorized by the Plan, or (iv) the making or delivery of any deed or other instrument of transfer under, in furtherance of or in connection with the Plan, including: (a) any merger agreements; (b) agreements of consolidation, restructuring, disposition, liquidation, or dissolution; (c) deeds; (d) bills of sale; or (e) assignments executed in connection with any restructuring transaction occurring under the Plan.

7.4. Vesting of Assets

On the Effective Date, except as otherwise expressly provided herein, title to all Assets shall remain/vest (a) in the Reorganized Debtors, as applicable, free and clear of all liens, Claims, Causes of Action, interests, rights, Security Interests, and other encumbrances under the Restructuring Alternative and without further order of the Bankruptcy Court or (b) in the Creditors Trust, free and clear of all liens, Claims, Causes of Action, interests, rights, Security Interests, and other encumbrances under the Liquidation Alternative. On and after the Effective Date, except as otherwise provided herein, the Debtors and the Reorganized Debtors may operate their business and may use, acquire, and dispose of their Assets free of any restrictions of the Bankruptcy Code.

7.5. Sources of Cash for Plan Distributions

All Cash necessary for the Debtors, Reorganized Debtors, or the Creditors Trustee, as the case may be, to make Distributions to Holders of Allowed Claims shall be obtained from the proceeds of the Plan Sponsor DIP Facility (if any), the New Equity Infusion, and/or Exit Financing.

7.6. Approval of Agreements

The solicitation of votes on the Plan shall be deemed a solicitation for the approval of the Plan Supplement Documents, Plan Documents and all transactions contemplated by the Plan. Entry of the Confirmation Order shall constitute approval of the Plan Supplement Documents and such transactions and authorization for the Reorganized Debtors and the Debtors, as appropriate, to execute and deliver each of the Plan Documents.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 46 of 66

Page 115: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 44

7.7. Entry of Final Decree

As soon as is practicable after the Effective Date, the Reorganized Debtors shall File an application with the Clerk of the Court requesting the entry of a Final Decree closing the Case. The Reorganized Debtors shall be responsible for all U.S. Trustee fees owed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1930 until entry of the final decree and closing of the bankruptcy case. Neither the Reorganized Debtors nor the Creditors Trust shall be responsible for any U.S. Trustee fees after the bankruptcy case is closed.

7.8. Retention of Rights to Pursue Causes of Action

Pursuant to § 1123(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, all Causes of Action (including Chapter 5 Causes of Action) are hereby preserved by this Plan, notwithstanding the occurrence of the Effective Date. The Reorganized Debtors (under the Restructuring Alternative) or the Creditor Trustee (under the Liquidation Alternative) shall, on behalf of the Debtors, retain the exclusive authority and all rights to enforce, commence, and pursue, as appropriate, any and all Causes of Action, whether arising before or after the Petition Date, including any actions specifically enumerated in the Plan Supplement Document, and the Reorganized Debtors’ or the Creditor Trustee’s, as the case may be, rights to commence, prosecute, or settle such Causes of Action shall be preserved. For the avoidance of doubt, the preservation of Causes of Action herein includes, without limitation, the right to object to all Claims, including Secured Claims, Administrative Claims, Priority Claims, and General Unsecured Claims.

The Debtors have not fully investigated any potential Causes of Action against any Persons or Entities at this time. The failure to list or describe any unknown Cause of Action herein is not intended to limit the rights of the Reorganized Debtors or the Creditor Trustee, as the case may be to pursue any known or unknown Cause of Action. Unless Causes of Action against a Person or Entity are expressly waived, relinquished, released, compromised or settled herein or any Final Order, the Debtors or the Estates (before the Effective Date) and the Debtors and the Reorganized Debtors (as applicable), hereby expressly reserve all Causes of Action (including the unknown Causes of Action) for later adjudication and therefore, no preclusion doctrine or other rule of law, including, without limitation, the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, issue preclusion, claim preclusion, estoppel (judicial, equitable or otherwise) or laches, shall apply to such Causes of Action after, or as a result of the confirmation or Effective Date of the Plan, or the Confirmation Order. In addition, the Debtors and the Estates, and the Reorganized Debtors, expressly reserve the right to pursue or adopt any Claims not so waived, relinquished, released, compromised, or settled that are alleged in any lawsuit in which one of the Debtors or Estates is a defendant or an interested party, against any Person or Entity, including, without limitation, the plaintiffs and co-defendants in such lawsuits. No Entity may rely on the absence of a specific reference in the Plan, the Plan Supplement Documents, or the Disclosure Statement to any Cause of Action against them as any indication that the Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors (under the Restructuring Alternative) or the Creditor Trustee (under the Liquidation Alternative) will not pursue any and all available Causes of Action against them. The Debtors and the Reorganized Debtors, on behalf of themselves or the Creditors Trustee, as the case may be, expressly reserve all rights to prosecute any and all Causes of Action other than Causes of Action settled, resolved or released pursuant to this Plan.

For the avoidance of doubt, the Reorganized Debtors reserve and shall retain all Causes of Action notwithstanding the rejection or repudiation of any Executory Contract or Unexpired Lease

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 47 of 66

Page 116: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 45

during the Chapter 11 Cases or pursuant to the Plan. The Reorganized Debtors shall retain and may exclusively enforce any and all such Causes of Action. The Reorganized Debtors (under the Restructuring Alternative) or the Creditor Trustee (under the Liquidation Alternative) shall have the exclusive right, authority, and discretion to determine and to initiate, File, prosecute, enforce, abandon, settle, compromise, release, withdraw, or litigate to judgment any such Causes of Action and to decline to do any of the foregoing without the consent or approval of any third party or further notice to or action, order, or approval of the Bankruptcy Court.

Such retained potential causes of action include, without limitation, (i) any potential Cause of Action arising from or related to any transfer or other actions or omissions referenced in each of the Debtors’ Schedules or Statement of Financial Affairs, as same may be amended (ii) any potential Causes of Action against any past or present insider of the Debtors, (iii) any causes of action related to the extent, validity, and priority of any liens, (iv) any actions for breach of contract, and (v) any actions arising in tort. The Reorganized Debtors or the Creditor Trustee, as the case may be, will review payments made by and transactions involving the Debtors prior to the Petition Date to determine whether preference and other actions to avoid such payments and transactions should be brought. Failure to specifically identify potential actions herein shall not be deemed a waiver of any such action by the Debtors or any other party. The Debtors shall have the right to identify any additional Causes of Action prior to the Effective Date of the Plan.

ARTICLE VIIIRESTRUCTURING ALTERNATIVE: THE CREDITORS TRUST

8.1. Creation of the Creditors Trust and Appointment of the Trustee

(a) On the Effective Date, the Creditors Trust will be created pursuant to the Creditors Trust Agreement.

(b) The Creditors Trust shall be administered by the Creditors Trustee who shall be selected by the Debtors and the Plan Sponsor and identified no later than ten (10) days prior to the Voting Deadline and notice of same shall be filed and served via ECF. The appointment of the initial Creditors Trustee and the terms of his/her compensation shall be subject to the approval of the Bankruptcy Court at the Confirmation Hearing.

(c) On the Effective Date, all of the Creditor Trust Assets shall transfer to and vest in the Creditors Trust free and clear of all Claims, Liens, interests, rights, and encumbrances without the need for any action by the Debtors or the Bankruptcy Court.

(d) Compensation owed to the Creditors Trustee and the Creditors Trustee’s counsel shall be paid from the Creditor Trust Assets, not from the Reorganized Debtors.

8.2. Property of the Creditors Trust

On the Effective Date, notwithstanding any prohibition of assignability under applicable law, the Reorganized Debtors shall be deemed to have automatically transferred to the Creditors Trust all of its right, title, and interest in and to the Creditors Trust Assets, and the right to object to any Claims, unless otherwise agreed. The Reorganized Debtors shall reasonably cooperate with the Creditors Trustee to provide access to the Reorganized Debtors’ books and records, necessary accounting

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 48 of 66

Page 117: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 46

information and documentation to enable the Creditors Trustee to efficiently and timely perform the functions of this Plan.

8.3. Purpose of the Creditors Trust

On the Effective Date, the Creditors Trust will be established and become effective for the benefit of the Creditors Trust Beneficiaries and for the primary purpose of liquidating its assets in accordance with Treas. Reg. § 301.7701-4(d) with no objective to continue or engage in the conduct of a trade or business, except to the extent reasonably necessary to, and consistent with, the liquidating purpose of the Creditors Trust. The Debtors, all Claimants, and all Holders of Interests shall be deemed to have adopted and approved the Creditors Trust Agreement. The purpose of the Creditors Trust is to (a) liquidate all Creditors Trust Assets and (b) distribute the proceeds of the Creditors Trust Assets to the Creditors Trust Beneficiaries. The Creditors Trust shall not be deemed a successor-in-interest of the Debtors or Reorganized Debtors for any purpose other than as specifically set forth herein or in the Creditors Trust Agreement. The Creditors Trust is intended to qualify as a “grantor trust” for federal income tax purposes, with the Holders of the Creditors Trust Interests treated as grantors and owners of the Creditors Trust. As soon as practicable after the Effective Date, the Creditors Trustee (to the extent that the Creditors Trustee deems it necessary or appropriate in his or her sole discretion) shall value the assets of the Creditors Trust based on the good faith determination of the Creditors Trustee. The valuation shall be used consistently by all parties for all federal income tax purposes. The Bankruptcy Court shall resolve any dispute regarding such valuation.

8.4. Powers of the Creditors Trustee

The Creditors Trustee shall have the power to administer the assets of the Creditors Trust in a manner consistent with the Creditors Trust Agreement. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Creditors Trustee shall (a) hold, administer, and prosecute the assets of the Creditors Trust and any proceeds thereof; (b) have the power and authority to retain, as an expense of the Creditors Trust, attorneys, advisors, other professionals and employees as may be appropriate to perform the duties required of the Creditors Trustee hereunder or in the Creditors Trust Agreement; (c) make distributions to Holders of Allowed Class 11, 12 and 13 Claims; and (d) provide periodic reports and updates to the Reorganized Debtors regarding the status of the administration of the Creditors Trust. The Creditors Trustee shall step into the shoes of the Reorganized Debtors under the Plan when making Distributions to Creditors Trust Beneficiaries pursuant to the Creditors Trust Agreement. The Bankruptcy Court shall retain jurisdiction to the extent permissible under applicable law, to resolve any disputes regarding the Creditors Trust, hear objections to Claims, and otherwise address such additional matters brought by the Creditors Trustee in the fulfillment of his/her duties pursuant to the Plan and the Creditors Trust Agreement.

8.5. Cooperation Between the Creditors Trustee and Reorganized Debtors

The Creditors Trustee and the Reorganized Debtors shall consult and cooperate reasonably in the performance of their duties under the Plan.

8.6. Termination of the Creditor Trust

The Creditors Trust shall continue to exist until the Creditors Trustee has administered all Creditors Trust Assets and made a final Distribution to Holders of Allowed Claims in accordance

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 49 of 66

Page 118: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 47

with the terms of the Plan and performed all other duties required by the Plan and the Creditor Trust Agreement. Multiple extensions of the termination of the Creditors Trust may be obtained so long as Bankruptcy Court approval is obtained prior to the expiration of each extended term. As soon as reasonably practicable after the Final Distribution, the Creditors Trustee shall dissolve the Creditors Trust pursuant to the Creditors Trust Agreement. Upon dissolution, the Creditors Trustee’s duties under the Creditors Trust Agreement and the Plan shall terminate.

ARTICLE IXLIQUIDATION ALTERNATIVE

9.1. Notice of Implementation of the Liquidation Alternative

If the Plan does not go effective under the Restructuring Alternative, (a) the Debtors shall file a notice with the Bankruptcy Court (the “Liquidation Notice”), stating that the Plan is effective under the Liquidation Alternative.

ARTICLE XCONDITIONS PRECEDENT TO EFFECTIVE DATE;

EFFECT OF PLAN CONFIRMATION

10.1. Conditions to Confirmation

The following are conditions precedent to confirmation of the Plan:

(a) The Clerk of the Bankruptcy Court shall have made findings and/or entered an order or orders (i) approving the Disclosure Statement as containing “adequate information” pursuant to § 1125 of the Bankruptcy Code, (ii) authorizing solicitation of votes with respect to the Plan, (iii) determining that all votes are binding and have been properly tabulated as acceptances or rejections of the Plan, (iv) confirming and giving effect to the terms and provisions of the Plan, (v) determining that all applicable tests, standards, and burdens in connection with the Plan have been duly satisfied and met by the Debtors and the Plan, and (vi) authorizing the Debtors to execute, enter into, and deliver the Plan Documents and to execute, implement, and to take all actions otherwise necessary or appropriate to give effect to the transactions and transfer of assets contemplated by the Plan and the Plan Documents;

(b) The Confirmation Order, the Plan Documents, and the Plan are each in a form satisfactory to the Debtors and the Plan Sponsor (if applicable); and

(c) The Confirmation Order shall include a determination that all of the settlements and compromises contained herein meet the applicable standards under § 1123(b)(3) of the Bankruptcy Code and Bankruptcy Rule 9019 for approval and implementation.

10.2. Conditions Precedent to the Effective Date: Restructuring Alternative

The following are conditions precedent to the occurrence of the Effective Date:

(a) The New Equity Infusion Documents have been executed and all conditions to the effectiveness thereof shall have been satisfied or waived;

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 50 of 66

Page 119: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 48

(b) All additional documents effectuating the Plan and the transactions thereunder have been executed and delivered by the parties thereto, and all conditions to the effectiveness of such documents have been satisfied or waived as provided therein;

(c) Approval by the Bankruptcy Court or the State of Texas, as applicable, of (i) the assumption or assumption and assignment or other transfer (if necessary) to the Plan Sponsor of the franchise or dealer agreements between one or more of the Debtors and Ford Motor Company, General Motors, Mitsubishi, and Toyota or (ii) other acceptance or approval of the Plan Sponsor (or members/equity owners of the Plan Sponsor) as the holder of the equity in the Reorganized Debtor;

(d) Payment of the New Equity Infusion by the Plan Sponsor to the Reorganized Debtors;

(e) All real estate on which the Reorganized Debtors will operate the Dealerships is owned or leased by the Reorganized Debtors.

(f) The Confirmation Order has become a Final Order, and it authorizes and directs the Debtors and the Reorganized Debtors to take all actions necessary or appropriate to implement and consummate the provisions of, and transactions described or contemplated in, the Plan;

(g) The Creditors Trust has been created;

(h) The New Equity has been issued; and

(i) Unless extended by the United States Trustee or the Court, the Restructuring Alternative under this Plan must go effective on or before seventy-five (75) days after the Confirmation Date.

10.3. Conditions Precedent to the Effective Date: Liquidation Alternative

The following are conditions precedent to the occurrence of the Effective Date:

(a) The Confirmation Order has become a Final Order, and it authorizes and directs the Debtors and the Creditor Trustee to take all actions necessary or appropriate to implement and consummate the provisions of, and transactions described or contemplated in, the Plan;

(b) The Creditors Trust has been created.

10.4. Waiver of Conditions

The Debtors may waive any one or more of the conditions set forth in Sections 10.1, 10.2(a)-(h) or 10.3 in a writing executed by the Debtors without notice or order of the Bankruptcy Court and without notice to any parties in interest other than the Plan Sponsor. The condition precedent in 10.2(i) cannot be waived or modified without approval by the United States Trustee or the Court.

10.5. Effect of Non-Occurrence of the Effective Date

If the Effective Date shall not occur, the Plan shall be null and void, and nothing contained herein shall: (a) constitute a waiver or release of any Claims against or Interests in the Debtors, (b)

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 51 of 66

Page 120: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 49

prejudice in any manner the Debtors’ rights, including, without limitation, any right to seek a further extension of the exclusivity periods under § 1121(d) of the Bankruptcy Code; or (c) constitute an admission, acknowledgement, offer, or undertaking by the Debtors.

ARTICLE XICLAIM OBJECTIONS, AND

MISCELLANEOUS DISTRIBUTION PROVISIONS

11.1. Objections to Claims

(a) All objections to Claims must be Filed on or before the Claims Objection Deadline, which is two hundred seventy (270) days after the Effective Date, unless extended by the Bankruptcy Court for cause shown. Any Disputed Claim to which an objection is not Filed on or before the Claims Objection Deadline will be deemed to constitute an Allowed Claim following the Claims Objection Deadline. The Creditors Trustee may, on or before the Claims Objection Deadline, File a motion with the Bankruptcy Court requesting an extension of the Claim Objection Deadline. Any such motion Filed by the Claims Objection Deadline shall, if granted, toll the Claims Objection Deadline solely with respect to the Claim that is the subject of the motion, until and including the date that is ten (10) business days following the date of entry of the Order granting the motion.

(b) Until a Contingent Claim becomes an Allowed Claim or is Disallowed, the Claim will be treated as a Disputed Claim. The Holder of a Contingent Claim will be entitled to a Distribution under the Plan only when the Contingent Claim becomes an Allowed Claim. Any Contingent Claim for reimbursement or contribution held by a Person that may be liable with the Debtors on a Claim of a Claimant is Disallowed as of the Effective Date if: (a) that Claimant’s Claim is Disallowed; (b) the Claim for reimbursement or contribution is contingent as of the Effective Date; or (c) that Person asserts a right of subrogation to the rights of the Claimant under § 509 of the Bankruptcy Code.

(c) To facilitate the timely and effective administration of Claims, except as otherwise expressly stated herein, following the later of the Effective Date and the applicable Bar Date, no original or amended proof of Claim may be Filed in any of the Chapter 11 Cases to assert a Claim against one of the Debtors or the Estates without prior authorization of the Bankruptcy Court, and any such proof of Claim which is Filed without such authorization shall be deemed null, void and of no force or effect; provided, however, that the Holder of a Claim that has been evidenced in the Chapter 11 Cases by the filing of a proof of Claim on or before the Bar Date shall be permitted to File an amended proof of Claim in relation to such Claim at any time if the sole purpose of the amendment is to reduce the amount of the Claim asserted.

11.2. Estimation of Claims

As applicable, the Creditors Trustee may at any time request that the Bankruptcy Court estimate any contingent, unliquidated, or Disputed Claim pursuant to § 502(c) of the Bankruptcy Code, regardless of whether the Debtors had previously objected to or otherwise disputed such Claim or whether the Bankruptcy Court has ruled on any such objection. The Bankruptcy Court shall retain jurisdiction to estimate any Claim at any time during litigation concerning any objection to any Claim, including during the pendency of any appeal relating to any such objection. If the Bankruptcy Court estimates any contingent, unliquidated, or Disputed Claim, the amount so estimated shall constitute either (a) the Allowed amount of such Claim or (b) a maximum limitation on such Claim, as

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 52 of 66

Page 121: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 50

determined by the Bankruptcy Court. If the estimated amount constitutes a maximum limitation on the amount of such Claim, the Creditors Trustee may pursue supplementary proceedings to object to the allowance of such Claim.

11.3. Distributions Under the Plan

(a) Allowed Claims

Distributions by either of the Trusts established hereunder will only be made to Holders of Allowed Claims in accordance with the terms of this Plan, the Plan Documents, and the Plan Supplement Documents. No payment or Distribution provided under this Plan shall be made on account of a Claim unless and until (and only to the extent that) such Claim becomes an Allowed Claim. Distribution will be made by the Creditors Trustee to Holders of Allowed Claims in all Classes entitled to Distribution pursuant to the Plan.

Any Holder of an Allowed Claim may receive, instead of the Distribution or treatment to which it is entitled under this Plan, any other Distribution or treatment that it and the Reorganized Debtors, Creditors Trustee, as the case may be, may agree to in writing, so long as such alternative treatment is (a) substantially the same or less favorable to the Claimant than the treatment otherwise prescribed herein and (b) does not violate any term of this Plan, the Plan Documents, or the Plan Supplement Documents.

(b) No Post-Petition Interest on Claims

Except as otherwise specifically provided in the Plan or Confirmation Order, post-petition interest shall not accrue or be paid on any Claim, and no Holder of a Claim shall be entitled to interest accruing on such Claim on or after the Petition Date.

(c) Due Authorization by Claimants

Every Claimant who elects to participate in the Distributions provided in this Plan warrants that the Claimant is authorized to accept in consideration of its Claim against the Debtors the Distributions provided for in this Plan and that there are no outstanding commitments, agreements, or understandings, express or implied, that may or can in any way defeat or modify the rights conveyed or obligations undertaken by the Claimant under the Plan.

(d) De Minimis Distributions and Rounding

Ratable Distributions to holders of Allowed Claims will not be made if such Distribution will result in a Distribution amount of less than $150.00, unless a request therefore is made in writing to the Trustee.

(e) Distribution Record Date

As of the close of business on the Effective Date, the various lists of Holders of Claims in each Class, as maintained by the Debtors or their respective agent(s), shall be deemed closed, and there shall be no further changes in the record Holders of any Claims after the Effective Date. Neither

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 53 of 66

Page 122: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 51

the Debtors, the Reorganized Debtors, nor the Creditors Trustee has any obligation to recognize any transfer of a Claim occurring after the close of business on the Effective Date.

(f) Delivery of Distributions and Other Notices

As applicable, the Reorganized Debtors or the Creditors Trustee will issue or cause to be issued, the applicable consideration under this Plan and, subject to Bankruptcy Rule 9010, will make Distributions to any Holder of an Allowed Claim as and when required by this Plan at (i) the address of such Holder on the books and records of the Debtors; (ii) the address set forth in any timely-filed proof of Claim; or (iii) the address listed in any “address-change” notice delivered to the Reorganized Debtors and the applicable Trustee, including any addresses included on any transfers of Claim Filed pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 3001 prior to the Effective Date. If any Distribution to any Holder is returned as undeliverable, no Distribution or payment to such Holder shall be made unless and until the Reorganized Debtors or the applicable Trustee, as the case may be, has been notified of the then-current address of such Holder. The Creditors Trustee may require any Trust Beneficiary or other party receiving a Distribution to furnish to said Trustee in writing his/her/its employer or taxpayer-identification number, as assigned by the IRS. Such Trustee may condition any Distribution to any Trust Beneficiary or other party receiving a Distribution on the receipt of such identification number. Notwithstanding the foregoing, neither the Creditors Trustee nor the Reorganized Debtors is under any duty to take any action to either attempt to locate any holder of a Claim, or obtain an executed Internal Revenue Service Form W-9 from any holder of a Claim. Neither Trustee has any responsibility to ensure that it has the correct mailing address and taxpayer or employer-identification number for a Creditor.

(g) Distributions to be Pro Rata Within a Class

Except as otherwise provided herein, all Distributions constituting a partial payment to holders of Allowed Claims within a specific Class shall be made on a Pro Rata basis to the holders of Allowed Claims in such Class.

(h) Distributions on Account of Disputed Claims

No Distributions will be made on a Disputed Claim unless and until such Disputed Claim becomes an Allowed Claim. In determining the amount of Distributions to be made under the Plan to Holders of Allowed Claims on the Effective Date or a Distribution date, the appropriate Distributions shall be made as if all the Disputed Claims as of such Distribution date were Allowed Claims in the full amount claimed by the Holders thereof, unless otherwise ordered or estimated by the Bankruptcy Court.

(i) Disputed Claim Reserves

(i) Disputed Claim Reserve Account

In addition to as provided otherwise in the Plan, the Creditors Trustee shall reserve for the account of each Holder of a Disputed Claim entitled to receive a Distribution in the Disputed Claim Reserve Account (x) Trust Assets that would otherwise be distributable to such Holder on such date in accordance with the Plan were such Disputed Claim an Allowed Claim on such date or (y) such

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 54 of 66

Page 123: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 52

other property as may be agreed between said Trustee, the Holder of the Disputed Claim, and the Reorganized Debtors.

Property reserved under this Section shall be set aside and, to the extent practicable, held by the applicable Trustee in an interest-bearing account to be maintained by said Trustee pending resolution of such Disputed Claims; provided, however, that Cash shall be invested in a manner consistent with the requirements of § 345 or as otherwise ordered by the Bankruptcy Court. All interest accruing on funds held in the Disputed Claim Reserve Account shall revert to the applicable Trust.

If a Disputed Claim becomes an Allowed Claim, property of the applicable Trust reserved for the Holder thereof shall be distributed by the Trustee to such Holder as soon as practicable after such Claim becomes an Allowed Claim pursuant to, and to the extent provided for in, the Plan. To the extent an objection to a Disputed Claim is upheld or a Claim is withdrawn or reduced, the reserves held on account of such Disputed or withdrawn Claim shall be reallocated to the Allowed Claimants in the applicable Class pursuant to their respective Pro Rata Share.

(ii) Disputed Administrative Claim Reserve Account

As to Priority Claims, Administrative Claims, and Other Secured Claims, the Reorganized Debtors shall reserve in the Disputed Administrative Claim Reserve Account on account of the Holder of a Disputed Claim (a) Assets of the Reorganized Debtors or the Creditors Trust, as the case may be, that would otherwise be distributable to such Holder on such date in accordance with the Plan were such Disputed Claim an Allowed Claim on such date or (b) such other property as may be agreed between the Reorganized Debtors or the Creditors Trustee, as the case may be, and the Holder of the Disputed Claim.

Property reserved under this Section shall be set aside and, to the extent practicable, held by the Reorganized Debtors or the Creditors Trustee, as the case may be, in an interest-bearing account to be maintained by the Reorganized Debtors or the Creditors Trustee, as the case may be, pending resolution of such Disputed Claims; provided, however, that Cash shall be invested in a manner consistent with the requirements of § 345 or as otherwise ordered by the Bankruptcy Court. All interest accruing on funds held in the Disputed Administrative Claims Reserve Account shall revert to the Reorganized Debtors or the Creditors Trust, as the case may be.

If a Disputed Claim becomes an Allowed Claim, property of the Reorganized Debtors or the Creditors Trust, as the case may be, that was reserved for the Holder thereof shall be distributed by the Reorganized Debtors or Creditors Trustee to such Holder as soon as practicable after such Claim becomes an Allowed Claim pursuant to (i) and to the extent provided for in the Plan; (ii) an agreement between the Holder of the Disputed Claim and the Reorganized Debtors or Creditors Trustee; or (iii) to a final and non-appealable order of the Bankruptcy Court. To the extent an objection to a Disputed Claim is upheld or a Claim is withdrawn or reduced, the reserves held on account of such Disputed or withdrawn Claim shall be reallocated to the Reorganized Debtors or the Creditors Trust, as the case may be.

(j) Undeliverable or Unclaimed Distributions

Any Entity that is entitled to receive a Cash Distribution under the Plan but that fails to cash a check within 90 days of its issuance shall be entitled to receive a reissued check from the Creditors

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 55 of 66

Page 124: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 53

for the amount of the original check, without any interest, if such Entity requests the Creditors Trust to reissue such check and provides such documentation as may be requested to verify that such Entity is entitled to such check prior to the later of (a) the first anniversary of the Effective Date and (b) 180 days after such Entity’s Claim becomes an Allowed Claim. If an Entity fails to cash a check within 90 days of its issuance and fails to request reissuance of such check pursuant to the terms of this Plan, such Entity shall not be entitled to receive any distribution under the Plan with respect to the amount of such check. If the distribution to any holder of an Allowed Claim is returned to the Creditors as undeliverable, no further Distributions will be made to such holder unless and until the Creditors Trust is notified in writing of such Holder’s current address; provided, however, that the Creditors Trust shall make reasonable efforts to contact the Holder of such Allowed Claim, identify the correct mailing address and resend the Distribution. All unclaimed property shall revert to the Creditors Trust for further disbursement in accordance with this Plan, and the Claim of any Holder or successor to such Holder with respect to such Claim shall be discharged and forever barred notwithstanding any federal or state escheatment laws to the contrary. In no event shall any funds escheat to the State of Texas.

11.4. Setoffs

Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, pursuant to §§ 502(d) or 553 of the Bankruptcy Code or any applicable non-bankruptcy law, agreements entered into in connection with the Plan, the Confirmation Order, or in agreements previously approved by Final Order of the Bankruptcy Court, the Debtors, the applicable Trustee, and the Reorganized Debtors may, but will not be required to, setoff against any Claim and the Distributions made with respect to the Claim, before any Distribution is made on account of such Claim, any and all of the claims, rights and Causes of Action of any nature that any of the Debtors may hold against the Holder of such Claim; provided, however, that neither the failure to effect such a setoff, the allowance of any Claim hereunder, any other action or omission of the Debtors, nor any provision of the Plan shall constitute a waiver or release by the Debtors or the Creditors Trustee of any such claims, rights and Causes of Action that the Debtors may possess against such Holder. If the Debtors fail to setoff against a Holder of a Claim and seek to collect a claim from the Holder of such Claim after a Distribution to the Holder of such Claim pursuant to the Plan, the Reorganized Debtors or Creditors Trustee shall be entitled to full recovery on its claim, if any, against the Holder of such Claim or Interest. In event shall any Party be entitled to setoff any Claim or Interest against any Claim of the Debtors without the consent of the Debtors, Reorganized Debtors and/or the Creditors Trustee unless such Party files a motion with the Bankruptcy Court requesting the authority to perform such setoff notwithstanding any indication in any proof of Claim or otherwise that such Party asserts, has, or intends to preserve any right of setoff pursuant to section 553 of the Bankruptcy Code or otherwise.

11.5. Recoupment

Except as otherwise expressly provided for in the Plan, in no event all shall any holder of Claims if Interests be entitled to recoup any Claim of Interest against any Claim, right or account receivable of the Debtors, the Reorganized Debtors and/or the applicable Trustee unless (a) such holder actually provides notice thereof in writing to the Debtors, the Reorganized Debtors and/or the applicable Trustee of its intent to perform a recoupment; (b) such notice includes the amount to be recouped by the holder of the Claim or Interest and a specific description of the basis for the recoupment, and (c) the Debtors and/or the applicable Trustee consents to the requested recoupment. In the absence of a written response from the Debtors, the Reorganized Debtors and/or the applicable

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 56 of 66

Page 125: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 54

Trustee consenting to a recoupment or an order of the Bankruptcy Court authorizing a recoupment, no recoupment by the holder of a Claim or Interest shall be allowed.

ARTICLE XIIEXECUTORY CONTRACTS AND UNEXPIRED LEASES

12.1. Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases to be Rejected Unless Expressly Assumed

To the extent necessary, under the Restructuring Alternative, the Plan operates as a motion under § 365 to assume all agreements, including sales and service agreements and real estate leases under which the Debtors operate automotive/vehicle franchise agreements at the Dealerships, including such agreements with Mitsubishi, Toyota, General Motors, and Ford Motor Company. The Confirmation Order shall constitute an order of the Bankruptcy Court approving such assumptions and, where applicable, assignments pursuant to § 365 of the Bankruptcy Code. All proposed cure amounts will be identified on the Schedule of Assumed Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases. If no such cure amount is on the Schedule of Assumed Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases, then the cure amount is zero. For all other Executory Contracts or Unexpired Leases, and for the foregoing automotive/vehicle franchise agreements in the event of the Liquidation Alternative, except as otherwise provided herein or in any order of the Bankruptcy Court, on the Effective Date or no later than thirty (30) days after the Effective Date, every Executory Contract and Unexpired Lease shall be deemed rejected unless it is identified on the Schedule of Assumed Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases. The Confirmation Order shall constitute an order of the Bankruptcy Court approving such rejections, pursuant to § 365 of the Bankruptcy Code, effective as of the Petition Date. Any party to an Executory Contract identified for rejection as provided herein may, within the same deadline and in the same manner established for Filing objections to Confirmation, File any objection thereto. Failure to file any such objection within the time period set forth above shall constitute consent and agreement to the rejection

Each Executory Contract on the Schedule of Assumed Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases shall be assumed only to the extent that it constitutes an executory contract or unexpired lease as contemplated by § 365 of the Bankruptcy Code. Nothing contained in this Plan constitutes an admission by the Debtors that any such contracts or leases are “executory” or that the Debtors have any liability thereunder. Further, such assumption is subject to the same rights that the Debtors held or hold on or after the Petition Date to modify or terminate such agreement(s) under applicable non-bankruptcy law. If the Bankruptcy Court or any other court of competent jurisdiction determines before, on, or after the Effective Date, that any agreement in the form of a lease of real or personal property identified for assumption on the Schedule of Assumed Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases is, in fact, a secured transaction, the resulting secured indebtedness arising from such determination shall be treated as a Class 8 Claim. Each Executory Contract assumed pursuant to this section shall be fully enforceable by the Reorganized Debtors in accordance with its terms, except as modified by the provisions of the Plan, any order of the Bankruptcy Court authorizing and providing for its assumption or applicable federal law. The Debtors/Reorganized Debtors reserve the right to modify the treatment of an Executory Contract pursuant to this Plan.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 57 of 66

Page 126: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 55

12.2. Approval of Assumptions

Subject to the occurrence of the Closing, the Confirmation Order (except as otherwise provided therein) shall approve the assumptions, revestments, and, to the extent not subject to dispute, the cure amounts described in this Article and listed on the Schedule of Assumed Contracts pursuant to § 365 of the Bankruptcy Code.

12.3. Objections to Assumption of Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases

Any Entity objecting to the proposed assumption of an Executory Contract based on any ground, including a lack of adequate assurance of future performance or the adequacy of the cure amount listed in the Schedule of Assumed Contracts and Unexpired Leases, shall File and serve a written objection to the proposed assumption of such Executory Contract by the same deadline and in the same manner established for filing objections to Confirmation.

Failure to File an objection within the time period set forth above shall constitute consent to the assumption of those Executory Contracts by the Reorganized Debtors, including an acknowledgment that the proposed assumption provides adequate assurance of future performance. If any Entity files an objection to the proposed assumption of an Executory Contract by the applicable Debtor based on any ground other than the adequacy of the cure amount set forth in the Schedule of Assumed Contracts and Unexpired Leases, and the Bankruptcy Court ultimately determines that the Debtors cannot assume such contract or lease or that the Debtors cannot provide adequate assurance of future performance as proposed or in any modified proposal submitted by the Debtors, then the Executory Contract shall automatically be deemed to have been rejected pursuant to this Article.

12.4. Payments Related to Assumption of Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases

If not the subject of bona-fide dispute pursuant to this Article as of Confirmation Date, monetary defaults, if any, under each Executory Contract to be assumed under the Plan shall be satisfied by the Debtors pursuant to § 365(b)(1) by payment in Cash of the amount set forth in the Schedule of Assumed Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases or such other amount as ordered by the Bankruptcy Court or agreed to by the parties on or as soon after the Effective Date as practicable or on such other terms as agreed to by the parties to such Executory Contract.

12.5. Rejection of Executory Contracts

The Plan constitutes and incorporates a motion by the Debtors to reject, as of the Effective Date, all Executory Contracts to which one of the Debtors is a party, except for Executory Contracts that (a) have been assumed or rejected pursuant to a Final Order of the Bankruptcy Court, (b) are the subject of a separate motion pursuant to § 365 of the Bankruptcy Code to be Filed and served by the Debtors on or before the Confirmation Date, or (c) are specifically designated on the Schedule of Assumed Contracts and Unexpired Leases.

12.6. Bar Date for Rejection Damages

If the rejection of an Executory Contract pursuant to this Article gives rise to a Claim by the other party or parties to such Executory Contract, such Claim must be Filed with the Bankruptcy

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 58 of 66

Page 127: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 56

Court by the Rejection Damages Bar Date. If such Claim is timely Filed and is an Other Secured Claim, it shall be classified in Class 8. If such Claim is timely Filed and is a General Unsecured Claim, it shall be classified in Class 11; provided, however, that in either event, any Claim arising from the rejection of an Executory Contract shall be forever barred and shall not be enforceable against the Debtors or the Estates, affiliates, successors, or properties, unless a proof of Claim is Filed by the Rejection Damages Bar Date.

ARTICLE XIIIRELEASES; INDEMNIFICATION; PLAN INJUNCTION

13.1. Binding Effect

Except as otherwise provided in § 1141(d)(3) of the Bankruptcy Code, and subject to the occurrence of the Effective Date, on and after entry of the Confirmation Order, the provisions of this Plan shall bind every Holder of a Claim against or Interest in each of the Debtors and inure to the benefit of and be binding on such Holder’s respective successors and assigns, regardless of whether the Claim or Interest of such Holder is impaired under this Plan and whether such Holder has accepted the Plan.

13.2. Compromise and Settlement of Claims, Interests, and Controversies

Pursuant to §§ 363 and 1123 of the Bankruptcy Code and Bankruptcy Rule 9019, and in consideration for the distributions and other benefits provided pursuant to the Plan, the provisions of the Plan shall constitute a good-faith compromise of substantially all Claims, Interests, and controversies relating to the contractual, legal, and subordination rights that a Holder of a Claim may have with respect to any Allowed Claim or Interest or any Distribution to be made on account of such Allowed Claim or Interest. Entry of the Confirmation Order shall constitute the Bankruptcy Court’s approval of the compromise or settlement of all such Claims, Interests, and controversies, as well as a finding by the Bankruptcy Court that such compromise or settlement is in the best interests of the Debtors, the Estates, and Holders, and is fair, equitable, and reasonable. In accordance with the provisions of the Plan, pursuant to § 363 of the Bankruptcy Code and Bankruptcy Rule 9019(a), without any further notice to or action, order, or approval of the Bankruptcy Court, after the Effective Date, the Trustee, in conjunction with the Reorganized Debtors, may compromise and settle Claims against them and Causes of Action against other Entities.

13.3. Discharge of Claims and Termination of Interests

Upon the Effective Date, and in consideration of the Distributions to be made under this Plan, except as otherwise provided in this Plan or in the Confirmation Order, each Holder of a Claim or Interest and any successor, assign, or affiliate of such Holder shall be deemed to have forever waived, released, and discharged the Debtors of and from any and all Claims, Interests, rights, and liabilities that arose prior to the Effective Date. Except as otherwise provided in the Plan, upon the Effective Date, all such Holders of Claims and Interests and their successors, assigns, and affiliates shall be forever precluded and enjoined, pursuant to §§ 105, 524, and 1141 of the Bankruptcy Code, from asserting any such discharged Claim against or terminated Interest in the Debtors or Reorganized Debtors.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 59 of 66

Page 128: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 57

13.4. Releases by a Holder of a Claim

As of the Effective Date, except for the rights that remain in effect from and after the Effective Date to enforce this Plan, the Plan Supplement Documents, and the Plan Documents, for good and valuable consideration, including the contributions and services of the Released Parties to the Debtors’ reorganization, the adequacy of which is hereby confirmed, and except as otherwise expressly provided in the Plan or the Confirmation Order, as an integral component of this Plan, the Released Parties are deemed forever released and discharged by the Releasing Parties from any and all claims, obligations, suits, judgments, damages, demands, debts, rights, Causes of Action, losses, and liabilities whatsoever, including any derivative claims, asserted or assertable on behalf of one or more of the Holders of Claims or other Entity, whether liquidated or unliquidated, fixed or contingent, matured or unmatured, known or unknown, foreseen or unforeseen, existing or hereinafter arising, in law, equity, or otherwise, that one or more of the Holders of Claims or other Entities would have been legally entitled to assert in its own right (whether individually or collectively) or on behalf of the Debtors or the Estates or other Entities, based on or related to, or in any manner arising from, in whole or in part, the Debtors, the Chapter 11 Cases, the subject matter of or the transactions or events giving rise or related to, any Claim or Interest that is treated in this Plan, the Debtors’ business, contractual arrangements between the Debtors and any Released Party, the restructuring of any Claim before or during the Chapter 11 Cases, the Disclosure Statement, this Plan, the Plan Support Documents, and the negotiation, formulation, or preparation thereof or the terms therein, the solicitation of votes with respect to this Plan, or any act or omission, other than Claims or Causes of Action arising out of or related to any act or omission of a Released Party that is a criminal act, willful misconduct, or gross negligence.

13.5. Exculpation, Release, and Injunction

(a) Exculpation and Release

To the extent permitted by applicable law, the Professionals of the Estates are hereby released and exculpated from any claim, obligation, suit, judgment, damage, demand, debt, right, Cause of Action, loss, and liability for any claim in connection with or arising out of the administration of the Chapter 11 Cases, including, without limitation, the planning, filing or the administration of the Chapter 11 Cases, the formulation, preparation, dissemination, approval, confirmation, administration, or consummation of the Plan, the Disclosure Statement, the solicitation of votes for or confirmation of the Plan or consummation or administration of the Plan, except to the extent arising out of or related to any act or omission of such Professional that is a criminal act, willful misconduct, or gross negligence. The protections of this section shall be in addition to, and shall not limit, all other releases, injunctions, exculpations, and any other applicable law or rule protecting the Professionals of the Estates and the Released Parties from liability. By accepting Distributions to this Plan, each Holder of an Allowed Claim will be deemed to have affirmatively and specifically consented to be bound by this Plan, including the injunctions set forth in this Plan.

(b) Injunction / Bankruptcy Court Jurisdiction

The Bankruptcy Court shall retain exclusive jurisdiction over any suit brought on any claim or Cause of Action against a Released Party or one of the Professionals of the Estates in connection with or arising out of the administration of the Chapter 11 Cases, including the negotiation and pursuit of the Disclosure Statement, the Plan Supplement Documents, the Plan Documents, the Restructuring,

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 60 of 66

Page 129: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 58

the solicitation of votes for, or confirmation of, this Plan, the funding of the Plan, the occurrence of the Effective Date, the administration of this Plan or the property to be distributed under the Plan, the issuance of securities under or in connection with this Plan or the transactions in furtherance of any of the foregoing, and any Entity bringing such suit shall do so in the Bankruptcy Court or such other court as the Bankruptcy Court may direct.

13.6. Injunction Related to Releases and Exculpation

The Confirmation Order shall permanently enjoin the commencement or prosecution by any Entity, whether directly, derivatively, or otherwise, of any Claims, obligations, suits, judgments, damages, demands, debts, rights, Causes of Action, losses, or liabilities released or exculpated pursuant to this Plan.

13.7. Term of Stay or Injunctions

Unless otherwise provided in the Plan or in the Confirmation Order, all injunctions or stays in effect in the Chapter 11 Cases or pursuant to §§ 105 or 362 of the Bankruptcy Code or any order of the Bankruptcy Court, and extant on the Confirmation Date (excluding any injunctions or stays contained in the Plan or the Confirmation Order), shall remain in full force and effect until the Effective Date. All injunctions or stays contained in the Plan or the Confirmation Order shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with their terms.

13.8. Injunction Against Interference with Plan

Upon entry of the Confirmation Order, all Holders of Claims and Interests and all other parties in interest, along with their respective successors and assigns and present and former affiliates, employees, agents, officers, directors, and principals, shall be enjoined from taking any action to interfere with the implementation or occurrence of the Effective Date and, after the occurrence of the Effective Date in the event of a Restructuring, shall be further enjoined from obstruction or interference, directly or indirectly, with the business operations, business relationships, existing contracts, or prospective contractual relationships of the Reorganized Debtors and/or any effort to impede the Reorganized Debtors’ ability to meet the Post-Confirmation Business Plan or otherwise perform their obligations under this Plan.

ARTICLE XIVMISCELLANEOUS

14.1. Retention of Jurisdiction

Notwithstanding entry of the Confirmation Order, the Bankruptcy Court shall retain jurisdiction as is legally permissible, including, without limitation, for the following purposes:

(a) to determine (i) any Disputed Claims, Disputed Interests and all related Claims accruing after the Confirmation Date including rights and liabilities under contracts giving rise to such Claims, (ii) the validity, extent, priority and avoidability of consensual and nonconsensual Liens and other encumbrances, (iii) preconfirmation tax liability pursuant to § 505, and (iv) controversies and disputes regarding the interpretation of the Plan and documents executed in connection therewith;

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 61 of 66

Page 130: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 59

(b) to allow, disallow, estimate, liquidate or determine any Claim or Interest against a Debtor and to enter or enforce any order requiring the filing of any such Claim or Interest before a particular date;

(c) to approve all matters related to the assumption, assumption and assignment, or rejection of any Executory Contract of the Debtor pursuant to § 365 and this Plan;

(d) to determine any request for payment of an Administrative Claim entitled to priority under § 507(a)(1), including compensation of parties entitled thereto, or fees and reimbursements to the Reorganized Debtors;

(e) to resolve controversies and disputes regarding the interpretation and implementation of the Plan, any disputes relating to whether or not a timely and proper proof of Claim was Filed or whether a Disallowed Claim or Disallowed Interest should be reinstated;

(f) to implement the provisions of the Plan and entry of orders in aid of confirmation and consummation of the Plan, including any disputes concerning the enforceability or applicability of the releases and injunctions contained herein;

(g) to modify the Plan pursuant to § 1127 of the Plan;

(h) to adjudicate any and all Causes of Action that arose in the Case prior to the Confirmation Date or in connection with the implementation of the Plan, whether or not pending on the Confirmation Date, including without limitation, any remands of appeals;

(i) to resolve disputes concerning any reserves with respect to Disputed Claims, Disputed Interests or the administration thereof;

(j) to resolve disputes, including to hear, adjudicate, and resolve any matter or dispute brought by the Reorganized Debtors or the Trustee, including (i) Claims objections and (ii) any other matter relating to Class 11, a Creditors Trust Asset, this Plan, a Plan Document, a Plan Supplement Document, or anything related to the Plan and the Confirmation Order;

(k) to resolve any disputes concerning whether a person or entity had sufficient notice of the Case, the applicable Bar Date, the hearing on the approval of the Disclosure Statement as containing adequate information, or the Confirmation Hearing for the purpose of determining whether a Claim or Interest is discharged hereunder or for any other purpose;

(l) to determine any and all applications, Claims, Interests, pending adversary proceedings and contested matters (including, without limitation, any adversary proceeding or other proceeding to recharacterize agreements or reclassify Claims or Interests) in these Case;

(m) to enter and implement such orders as may be appropriate in the event the Confirmation Order is for any reason stayed, revoked, modified, or vacated;

(n) to seek the issuance of such orders in aid of execution of the Plan, to the extent authorized by § 1142 of the Bankruptcy Code;

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 62 of 66

Page 131: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 60

(o) to consider any modifications of the Plan, to cure any defect or omission, or reconcile any inconsistency in any order of the Bankruptcy Court, including, without limitation, the Confirmation Order;

(p) to recover all Assets of the Debtors and property of the Estates, wherever located, including any Cause of Action;

(q) to resolve any dispute relating to the approval and payment of the fees and expenses of the Debtors or its respective professionals;

(r) to resolve matters concerning state, local, and federal taxes in accordance with §§ 346, 505, and 1146;

(s) to hear any other matter not inconsistent with the Bankruptcy Code;

(t) to resolve any and all disputes or controversies relating to distributions to be made, and/or reserves or escrows to be established, under the Plan;

(u) to enter one or more final decrees closing the Case;

(v) to enforce the Plan, including the releases, injunctions, and exculpations granted herein; and

(w) to approve settlements relating to the above.

14.2. Successors and Assigns

The rights, benefits, and obligations of any Entity named or referred to in this Plan shall be binding on, and shall inure to the benefit of, any heir, executor, administrator, successor, or assign of such Entity.

14.3. Ipso Facto and Similar Provisions Ineffective

Any term of any policy, contract, instrument, or other obligation applicable to the Debtors shall be void and of no further force or effect with respect to the Debtors to the extent that such policy, contract, or other obligation is conditioned on, creates an obligation of the Debtors as a result of or gives rise to a right of any Entity based on any of the following (a) the insolvency or financial condition of the Debtors, (b) the commencement of the Chapter 11 Cases, and (c) the confirmation or consummation of this Plan.

14.4. Cram Down

If all of the applicable requirements for Confirmation of the Plan are met as set forth in § 1129(a) except subsection (8) thereof, the Debtors may request the Bankruptcy Court to confirm the Plan pursuant to § 1129(b), notwithstanding the requirements of § 1129(a)(8), on the basis that the Plan is fair and equitable as to the Creditors and does not discriminate unfairly with respect to any Impaired Class of Claims against the Debtors that does not vote to accept the Plan as described in the

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 63 of 66

Page 132: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 61

Disclosure Statement. The Debtors reserve the right to alter the treatment of any Class in order to effectuate a cram down under § 1129(b).

14.5. Modification of the Plan

The Debtors reserve the right, in accordance with the Bankruptcy Code, to amend or modify this Plan prior to the Confirmation Date. After the Confirmation Date, the Debtors may, upon order of the Court, amend or modify this Plan in accordance with § 1127(b), or remedy any defect or omission or reconcile any inconsistency in this Plan in such manner as may be necessary to carry out the purposes and intent of this Plan.

14.6. Withdrawal or Revocation of the Plan

The Debtors reserve the right to revoke or withdraw the Plan prior to the Confirmation Date. If the Plan is revoked or withdrawn by the Debtors, or if the Confirmation Date does not occur with respect to the Debtors, the Plan shall be of no further force or effect.

14.7. Notices

All notices, requests, elections, or demands in connection with the Plan shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been given when received or, if mailed, five (5) days after the date of mailing provided such writing shall have been sent by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, and sent to the following:

Counsel for the Debtors: Marcus A. Helt C. Ashley Ellis Foley Gardere 2021 McKinney Avenue Suite 1600 Dallas, Texas 75201 Telephone: (214) 999-3000 Facsimile: (214) 999-4667

To the Creditors Trustee: Dennis Faulkner Lain, Faulkner & Co., P.C. 400 N. St. Paul, Suite 600 Dallas, Texas 75201 Telephone: (214) 720-1929

To the Creditors Trustee’s Counsel:

Telephone: (___) ___-____ Facsimile: (___) ___-____

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 64 of 66

Page 133: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 62

To the Plan Sponsor: ____________________ _____________________ _____________________ __________________ Telephone: (___) ___-____ Facsimile: (___) ___-____

To the Plan Sponsor’s Counsel: ____________________

_____________________ _____________________ __________________ Telephone: (___) ___-____ Facsimile: (___) ___-____

14.8. Severability

Should any term or provision of the Plan be determined by the Bankruptcy Court to be invalid, void or unenforceable, such determination shall in no way limit or affect the enforceability or operative effect of any other provision of the Plan. If any term or provision of the Plan is of such a character as to deny Confirmation, the Debtors reserve the right to strike such provisions from the Plan and seek Confirmation of the Plan as modified. Notwithstanding any such holding, alteration, or interpretation, the remainder of the terms and provisions of the Plan will remain in full force and effect and will in no way be affected, impaired or invalidated by such holding, alteration or interpretation. The Confirmation Order will constitute a judicial determination and will provide that each term and provision of the Plan, as it may have been altered or interpreted in accordance with the foregoing, is valid and enforceable pursuant to its terms.

14.9. All Claims

This Plan is intended to deal with all Claims against and Interest in each of the Debtors of whatever character whether or not disputed, contingent, or liquidated and whether or not allowed by the Bankruptcy Court under § 502 of the Bankruptcy Code. However, only those Claims Allowed under § 502 shall be entitled to receive the treatment afforded by the Plan.

14.10. Immediate Binding Effect

This Plan shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of each of the Debtors, the Reorganized Debtors, all present and future Holders of Claims and Interests, and their respective successors and assigns, and all other parties in interest in the Case. In addition, notwithstanding Bankruptcy Rules 3020(e), 6004(h), or 7062 or otherwise, upon the occurrence of the Effective Date, the terms of the Plan and the Plan Supplement Documents shall be immediately effective and enforceable and deemed binding on the Debtors, the Reorganized Debtors, and any and all Holders of Claims or Interests (irrespective of whether their Claims or Interests are deemed to have accepted the Plan), all Entities that are parties to or are subject to the settlements, compromises, releases, discharges, and injunctions described in the Plan, each Entity acquiring property right under the Plan, and any and all non-Debtor parties to Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases with one of the Debtors.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 65 of 66

Page 134: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR REAGOR-DYKES – PAGE 634505-7683.14

14.11. Reservation of Rights.

Except as expressly set forth in the Plan, the Plan shall have no force or effect unless the Bankruptcy Court enters the Confirmation Order, and the Confirmation Order shall have no force or effect if the Effective Date does not occur. None of the filing of the Plan, any statement or provision contained in the Plan, or the taking of any action by any Debtor with respect to the Plan, the Disclosure Statement, or the Plan Supplement Document shall be or shall be deemed to be an admission or waiver of any rights of any Debtor with respect to the Holders before the Effective Date.

Dated: August ___, 2019 Respectfully submitted, Reagor-Dykes Motors, LP et al.

By: /s/ Robert Schleizer Chief Restructuring Officer

Prepared by:

Marcus A. Helt (TX 24052187) C. Ashley Ellis (TX 00794824) FOLEY GARDERE FOLEY & LARDNER 2021 McKinney Avenue, Suite 1600 Dallas, TX 75201 Telephone: (214) 999-3000 Facsimile: (214) 999-4667

COUNSEL FOR DEBTORS AND DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSION

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-1 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 66 of 66

Page 135: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-2 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 1 of 7

Page 136: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-2 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 2 of 7

Page 137: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-2 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 3 of 7

Page 138: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-2 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 4 of 7

Page 139: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-2 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 5 of 7

Page 140: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-2 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 6 of 7

Page 141: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-2 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 7 of 7

Page 142: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-3 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 1 of 5

Page 143: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-3 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 2 of 5

Page 144: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-3 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 3 of 5

Page 145: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-3 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 4 of 5

Page 146: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-3 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 5 of 5

Page 147: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-4 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 1 of 4

Page 148: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-4 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 2 of 4

Page 149: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-4 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 3 of 4

Page 150: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-4 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 4 of 4

Page 151: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

4846-0049-7563.4

EXHIBIT E

Causes of Action

All Causes of Action are retained by the Reorganized Debtor(s) or the successor to the Debtors – that is, the Creditor Trustee – as applicable, under the Plan. In the abundance of caution, in addition to the Avoidance Actions and the Causes of Action and claims of the Estates listed in the Debtors’ Statement of Financial Affairs and the Disclosure Statement, the Debtors also list the following Causes of Action and claims as being retained by the Plan and the Confirmation Order:

all claims and Causes of Action listed in, referenced in, or attached as an exhibit to the Plan, the Disclosure Statement, the Schedules, Statements of Financial Affairs, Plan Supplement, or in any Plan Document, and all claims and causes of action for all contract theories of recovery, including contract and usury, quasi-contract claims, including quantum meruit, promissory estoppel, suit on a sworn account, money had and received, tort theories of liability, including tortious interference with existing contract, tortious interference with contractual/business relations, conversion, breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, bad faith denial of coverage or other insurance claim, constructive eviction, wrongful eviction, wrongful foreclosure, malpractice, libel, slander, malicious prosecution, negligence, gross negligence, premises liability, trade-secret misappropriation, misrepresentation; breach of warranty claims and related theories of recovery; statutory claims and related theories of recovery, including claims under the Bankruptcy Code, including objections to the allowance of claims for disgorgement or otherwise, including any related to extent, priority, subordination, or validity of liens, claims under 11 U.S.C. §§ 509, 510, 542, 543, 544, 547, 548, 549, and 550, claims pursuant to the Texas Business and Commerce Code, including fraudulent transfers under all applicable law, including chapter 27, and claims pursuant to title 18 U.S.C., participatory, vicarious, secondary, and related theories of liability including, without limitation, aiding and abetting, conspiracy, principal-agent, partnership, alter ego, common enterprise, joint and several liability, proportionate responsibility, contribution, and veil piercing; equitable claims including claims for lien subordination and contempt; any such claim or cause of action relating to any counterclaim, demand, controversy, cost, debt, sum of money, account, reckoning, bond, bill, damage, obligation, liability, objection, legal proceeding, equitable proceeding, and execution of any nature, type, or description, avoidance action, preference action, fraudulent-transfer action, strong-arm-power action, state-law fraudulent-transfer action, improper assignment of interest, negligence, gross negligence, willful misconduct, usury, fraud, deceit, misrepresentation, conspiracy, unconscionability, duress,

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-5 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 1 of 5

Page 152: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

4846-0049-7563.4

economic duress, defamation, control, interference with contractual and business relations, conflict of interest, misuse of insider information, concealment, disclosure, secrecy, misuse of collateral, wrongful release of collateral, failure to inspect, environmental due diligence, negligent loan processing and administration, wrongful recoupment, wrongful setoff, violations of statutes and regulations of governmental entities, instrumentalities and agencies, equitable subordination, debt recharacterization, substantive consolidation, securities and antitrust laws violations, tying arrangements, deceptive trade practices, breach or abuse of any alleged fiduciary duty, breach of any special relationship, course of conduct or dealing, obligation of fair dealing, obligation of good faith, at law or in equity, in contract, in tort, or otherwise, known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected; and any claims or causes of action related to any matter listed on the Schedules or Statement of Financial Affairs of any of the Debtor, including all attachments and amendments thereto (the foregoing claims and causes of action along with the same found in the Confirmed Plan and Confirmation Order are collectively referred to as the “Claims and Causes of Action”).

The Reorganized Debtors or the Creditor Trustee shall have the right to supplement the Claims and Causes of Action as necessary throughout their/his investigation of the Debtors’ affairs. In connection with the Claims and Causes of Action, the following is designated as potential damages claims:

All available theories of recovery and damages, including, without limitation, all actual, punitive, and other statutory damage claims, rights to reimbursement and costs, and all other relief, general or special, at law or in equity, to which the Debtors, the Reorganized Debtors, or the Creditor Trustee may be rightfully entitled. The Reorganized Debtors and the Creditor Trustee shall have the right to supplement the Claims and Causes of Action as necessary throughout its/his investigation of the Debtors’ affairs.

The following non-exhaustive and non-mutually exclusive list of entities and individuals as potential defendants to the Claims and Causes of Action includes all names listed in the Schedules, and:

All current and former officers, directors, employees, and other agents of the Debtors and all affiliates of the Debtors, all trade vendors and other creditors of the Debtor, all entities and individuals that received transfers from or on behalf of the Debtors at least from July 31, 2014, (and maybe longer) to the present and maybe longer; all entities and individuals that owed fiduciary duties to the Debtors from July 31, 2014, (and maybe

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-5 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 2 of 5

Page 153: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

4846-0049-7563.4

longer) to the present; all banks who received money from the Debtors, held deposited funds, or otherwise did business with the Debtors; all “retail lenders” with whom the Debtors did business, including lenders who are later found to have not funded retail installment contracts;1 all insurance companies with any insurance coverage in place for the benefit of the Debtors from July 31, 2014 (and maybe longer), to the present; all individuals and entities listed on the Schedules or Statement of Financial Affairs of the Debtors, including any attachments and amendments thereto; all companies that furnished utilities for the Debtors, all unsecured creditors of the Debtors, all investors of the Debtors and the Non-Debtor Affiliates, any entity or individual in possession of or having control over property of the Debtors or operations of the Debtors; any entity or individual responsible or who contributed to any losses or damages suffered by the Debtors or its creditors or investors, or any party that has appeared in the Bankruptcy Case (collectively referred to as the “Potential Parties”).

To the extent not otherwise already included above, the Potential Parties include, without limitation, the following:

Ford Motor Credit Company, LLC

AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. d/b/a GM Financial, LLC

AIM Bank

First Capital Bank of Texas, N.A.

First Bank and Trust, Co.

Liberty Capital Bank

Vista Bank

Ford Motor Company

Gulf States Toyota

General Motors Company

1 The Debtors estimate that they conducted business with over 58 such retail lenders, including those listed herein, many of whom have filed motions in the Bankruptcy Court. These include banks, finance companies, and credit unions.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-5 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 3 of 5

Page 154: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

4846-0049-7563.4

Lane Gorman Trubitt

Ally Financial, Inc.

Americredit

Bank of The West

BB&T Dealer Finance

BBT

BBT Dealer Finance

BBVA Compass

Credit Acceptance Corporation

Capital One

Compass Bank

CPS

Exeter Finance LLC

First Basin Credit Union

First Financial Bank

Flagship Credit Acceptance

Foursight Capital LLC

Global Lending Services, LLC

MUSA

MY Community Federal Credit Union

PAC Auto Finance

Regional Acceptance Corporation

Santa Fe Federal Credit Union

Santander Consumer USA Inc.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-5 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 4 of 5

Page 155: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

4846-0049-7563.4

SunTrust Banks, Inc.

TD Auto Finance LLC

US Bank

Westlake Financial Services

To reiterate, the preserved litigation includes litigation against all parties who participated in any scheme and all parties (including “retail lenders”) who did not fund sales of chattel paper (also known sometimes as “contracts in transit”), owe the Debtors/Estates for any cause of action, benefitted from payments made by the Debtors, or otherwise holds money due to the Debtors.

Potential Parties includes all affiliates, successors, transferees, directors, officers, employees, and other agents of any entity or individual that would otherwise qualify as a Potential Party.

The Reorganized Debtors or Creditor Trustee shall have the right to supplement the Claims and Causes of Action as necessary throughout its/his investigation of the Debtors’ affairs.

*This is a non-exclusive list. The failure to include any name or title on this list, the Schedules, the Statements of Financial Affairs, the Plan, the Disclosure Statement, or any Plan Document or Plan Supplement should not be construed as a waiver of any Cause of Action against that individual or Entity.

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-5 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 5 of 5

Page 156: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-6 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 1 of 10

Page 157: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-6 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 2 of 10

Page 158: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-6 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 3 of 10

Page 159: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-6 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 4 of 10

Page 160: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-6 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 5 of 10

Page 161: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-6 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 6 of 10

Page 162: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-6 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 7 of 10

Page 163: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-6 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 8 of 10

Page 164: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-6 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 9 of 10

Page 165: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-6 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 10 of 10

Page 166: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-7 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 1 of 1

Page 167: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE …strettodocs.s3.amazonaws.com/files/b7b10cd8-d9eb... · REAGOR-DYKES MOTORS, LP, et al.1 Debtors. § § § § § Case No. 18-50214-rlj-11

Reagor-Dykes Auto Group

Case Number: 18-20214

Balance Sheet as of March 30, 2019

31-Mar-19

ASSETSUNRESTRICTED CASH 68,069

RESTRICTED CASH -

TOTAL CASH 68,069

ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE (NET) -

INVENTORY

NOTES RECEIVABLE -

PREPAID EXPENSES -

OTHER (SEE SUPPORTING SCHEDULE) -

TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 68,069

PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT -

LESS: ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION -

NET PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT -

NOTES RECEIVABLE -

OTHER ASSETS - NET OF AMORT -

OTHER (SEE SUPPORT SCHEDULE) -

TOTAL ASSETS 68,069

POSTPETITION LIABILITIESACCOUNTS PAYABLE 1,066,274

TAXES PAYABLE 34,456

NOTES PAYABLE -

TRUSTEE FEES 26,232

PROFESSIONAL FEES 3,863,314

SECURED DEBT -

OTHER 1,141,571

Total Postpetition Liabilities 6,131,847

PREPETITION LIABILITIES (See Prepetition Liabilities Schedule) -

SECURED DEBT 75,528,534

PRIORITY DEBT 341,821

UNSECURED DEBT 18,781,300

OTHER (ATTACH LIST) -

Total Prepetition Liabilities 94,651,655

Total Liabilities 100,783,502

EQUITY -

PREPETITION OWNERS' EQUITY (36,975,022)

POSTPETITION CUMULATIVE PROFIT OR (LOSS) (63,740,412)

DIRECT CHARGES TO EQUITY (ATTACH EXPLANATION) -

TOTAL EQUITY (100,715,434)

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY 68,069

Balance Sheet

Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 1390-8 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 06:52:35 Page 1 of 1