documentin

193
C O R P ORATION IIQil ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS in<T 1 FINAL REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT VOLUME 2 APPENDIX A JACK'S CREEK SITE M1FFLIN COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDY EPA WORK ASSIGNMENT NUMBER 37-15-3L2W CONTRACT NUMBER 68-W8-0037 HALLIBURTON NUS PROJECT NUMBER 2567 AUGUST 1993

Upload: others

Post on 09-Jul-2020

16 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Documentin

C O R P ORATION IIQil ENGINEERS AND PLANNERSin<T 1

FINAL

REMEDIAL INVESTIGATIONREPORT

VOLUME 2APPENDIX A

JACK'S CREEK SITEM1FFLIN COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDY

EPA WORK ASSIGNMENT NUMBER 37-15-3L2WCONTRACT NUMBER 68-W8-0037

HALLIBURTON NUS PROJECT NUMBER 2567

AUGUST 1993

Page 2: Documentin

APPENDICES

Volume

A GEOLOGY .................................................. 2

A-1 Boring and Monitoring Well LogsA-2 Aquifer Testing

Slug TestingA-3 Groundwater Elevation LogsA-4 Jack's Creek Flow Measurements

B SAMPLE LOGSHEETS .......................................... 3

B-1 Surface Soil LogsheetsB-2 Subsurface Soil LogsheetsB-3 Sediment LogsheetsB-4 Waste and Sludge LogsheetsB-5 Drum LogsheetsB-6 Groundwater LogsheetsB-7 Surface Water Logsheets

C dHEMICAL DATA ......................................... 4 & 5

C-1 Data Summary FormsC-2 Computer Basefiles

D RISK ASSESSMENT ........................................... 6

D-1 EPA Risk-Based Screening LevelsD-2 Sample Calculation for Determining the 95 Percent Upper Confidence Limit

on a Mean Concentration of a Log-Normal DistributionD-3 Carcinogenic and Noncarcinogenic Risk CalculationsD-4 Uptake/Biokinetic Model Run for LeadD-5 Ecological DataD-6 NEPA Compliance Information and Correspondence

B C:\27307\RI\APPENDIX.TOC 4/12/93 3:41 1

AR300760

Page 3: Documentin

APPENDIX A

GEOLOGY

AR3QQ76)

Page 4: Documentin

A-1

Boring and Monitoring Well Logs

AR300762

Page 5: Documentin

iGannett FlemingI ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS DRILLING CONTRACTOR

BORING LOGBORING NO. ______ ___PROJECT NO. a."73Zr7.o/aiDATE STARTED 7 JDATE FINISHED

DEPTHSAMPLENO. ftTYPES-f

S-3

s-s

BLOWSORROD

a-«/-

7-/ST-

3-3-

S-T — -. „;zW-

HRECOV-ERY

LEQENO

/O"

/7//

r

as

PROJECT/LOCAnONGEOLOGIST/ENGINEER

DRILLERRIG TYPESURFACE ELEVATION

DRILUNQ METHOD /fc*aerTOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE ff"

GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Data, Time, Lava!)

8-f*'

DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(DctMNy, CofMMMncy or Rode HwonMSf uses

Cotor ClaiiHIrrtnn; «e. . . .)«**T*

O

0,O

6,6

FID

6-0

REMARKS

GENERAL REMARKS.k r IV ^* ixi

I I"SK»I.i-fta WtjJr. £!r|<S'T" »v^»

MR300763BORING NO.SHEET OF

Page 6: Documentin

Gannett FlemingENGINEERS AND PLANNERS **

GEOLOGIST/ENGINEERDRILLING CONTRACTOR

BORING LOG DRILLERBORING NO. MIAJ-2.OO RK3TYPEPROJECT NO.

DRILLING METHOD / C<tf rTOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE

DATE STARTEDDATERNISHED

QROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Data, Tlma, Lavai)

DEPTHSAMPLENO. ftTYPE

BLOWSORROD

HRECOV-ILEQENOIERY

DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(Mratty. CottMwicy or Rack Hatinm;

Color; Cm»«riHnn; Me. . . .)uses REMARKS

5-f3-3

2.0"s.'H-. -/Vac*

VJOM 0.0

as-3?

5V'-3T>j-w ic, . ^

S-J3

-7

S*-e S /f (T-cf")

^» __ _______ / '-+• y _______ _____ Mp y.'<*rT **<*>"- >"»uTiC roCiL Tf/i

GENERAL REMARKS

RQHIM« MO

SHEET ^ OF

Page 7: Documentin

GoiNieU FlemingI ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS *"

BORING LOGBORING NO.PROJECT NO.DATE STARTED ~7//2i<?DATE FINISHED

DEPTH

3s

SAMPLENO. ftTYPE

s-rr

s-ao

ORROD

11-03-20-3.7

RECOV-ERY

/V"

'5"

7"

r

PROJECT/LOCATIONGEOLOGIST/ENGINEERDRILLING CONTRACTOR v4CW/*- MJDRILLERRIG TYPE - / fySURFACE ELEVATION

DRILLING METHOD >??x«erTOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE ' ??'

GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Data, Tlma, Lavai)

LEGEND

.7*V

gv -»

DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(OwMftK CoraMMwy or Rock Ilirdrmi;

. . . .)uses

s//r a**ef v/erv -<«<i-'H»«'rai. reck

S,V/j /'Trip

i IT

0.0

REMARKS

rna*«

GENERAL REMARKS.

AR300765BORING NO. H\fJ -SHEET '? OF 3

Page 8: Documentin

,.£.SB Gannett Flemiid ENGINEERS AND PLANNERSng OVERBURDEN MONITORING WELL DATA

PROJECT/LOCATION 3otV»S Gttr\. Si nPROJECT NO. Vrrzcrr.o&i BORING NO. ,Huj-a.<v}GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER 5?fe/V<f.DRILLING CONTRACTOR Mardfn

. "" VTrtV

,"rfAV/ COMPLETION DATE 7/ J&UL*s ZHS, DRILLING METHOD Ax:e.r ^

DRILLER ZX»* \jJ\lU\J ' DEVELOPMENT METHOD" far Sum t, ^

. 1

SL —— If

EL — •wK*r"

EL. ———

C k.

EL.

EL.EL. ——EL. ——

• * ]

i* • JJJJ i

•V; =

'•'• = j;l- _ •"."• *• -

~~~~~~— - ———— LOCK/KEY SERIAL NO '

it. ———————————————— TYPE OF PROTECTIVE CASING SfV €.l

U' PROTECTIVE CASING DIAMETER ———

1 ————————————————— DIAMETER OF BOREHOLE IN OVERBURDEN ———

1 —————————————————— TYPE OF RISER PIPE V VC

1 n •'1 RISER PIPE ID <J.

1 ————————————————— TYPE OF BACKFILL L?£*H« "T £"1TOO-V

I1 • OZ/' C> ifI ——————————————————— DEPTH TO TOP OF SEAL fr* / ""*=*

| —————————————————— TYPE OF SEAL &t &&>*!• k fZ/lA-fa

TYPE OF FILTER PACK S*f*K3 (/« /e " 3 )

•' ——————————————————— DEPTH TO-TOP OF SCREEN &&.S~'

V TYPE OF SCREEN P/C

SCREEN SLOT SIZE ,, £2.6 "SCREEN ID. 3. *

- - 5>-5'/- —————————————————— DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF WELL -i? '

^ ' ncoru in BftTmu ne artOBuru B 7 ''"•""*""*• * '

GENERAL REMARKS W<t™f Cft*tt CxA" /*V P /C <xi arojTm* >VflC,veSScA. ,

———————————————————————————————————————— 1

BORING NO. AtM-3.£

AR300766

Page 9: Documentin

fife Gannett FlemlnJSl ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS

[Iff <

BORING LOG !BORING NO. /4iA/-Or00s ^PROJECT NO. 2.~7*0~Z6O/ -DATE STARTED 7//7A?/ *DATE FINISHED YyVgf/?/

DEPTH

•MM

••

:zr*

SAMPLENO. ftTYPE

>

fetowsORROD

HRECOV-ERY

LEGEND

»ROJECT/U>CATK>N J .U« C.ft,3EOLOGIST/ENQINEER AU*WILLING CONTRACTOR Vr WyJRILLER £k* U/;//«»/^IGTYPE S- ,/ '5URFACE ELEVATION S , 5"O

tk 5;-f,s/Lrf/' t.";, . M f r frt.6..

DRILLING METHOD /rl erTOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE 44 '

3ROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Data, Time, Laval) (/afifil, Mi3> S~S3- )

DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS 'Ts"(MMttK ComMMiey or flock H«dMM;

OK* e/#"-o ,J7 S,'!

<ra-< w\e.vx (_ "^p/

"i ^ / / -. _ j> \ . . ^ c ^ V y/ /

A ATi tAX f X . p"^ AV^G^ v_ 'V ^ ./ Ct . 3

j

.»l ( _ Li. ^ V- 'dCT1\NfiT C" >Tt v^C^ <K OO

uses

5

FK>

o.o

C-O

o.o

REMARKS

' SlS' lc;

GENERAL REMARKS /"Sarg-fafl/g v^AS Af.Og.irg TS *1* wocTu.auT" <g»ivy <;a.L^«y>l».T _ . _ ^ YT r~

j oV w\A-t'g-/v<i. Cov\S»S'i ^ oV Ti A ^j<^^sITTo»Ci7«t>BORING NO. HvJ-2.00^SHEET _2__OP ^&R30U/b7

Page 10: Documentin

irij connett FlemingIC3H ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS

BORING LOGBORING NO. /4u/-?LOOsPROJECT NO. t"7:?£J"%<0O/DATE STARTED "7/17/31DATE FINISHED 7//£/9J

DEPTH

y<9—

*!

SAMPLENO. ftTYPE

BLOWSORROD

HRECOV-ERY

PROJECT/LOCATION ~5Z.f ]*.><> r s*>»k SV^»GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER S¥a/jj,«.±t /3a«w«s 'DRILLING CONTRACTOR SJaLir» -Uulw 3T*C~DRILLER A** Ui'JttyRIG TYPE £-,£/SURFACE ELEVATION <f, ~O

DRILLING METHOD / <erTOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE - V'

GROUNDWWTER OBSERVATIONS (Data, Tlma, LavaQ (; /tf/<J/<? / /3 ; 533 - iOB

LEGEND

CA-fc/T/j X /57 ^ . HHFIDESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(OtraKy. ComfcMncy or Rock HwdnMK

Color, ClmHIcrtlon; Me. . . .)

_ V ii_ •» A• A*M.e iA>erf cu\T>.-'< «. .ex

uses PK)FID

00

iREMARKS

* *-* "2 * A

j *j I **i /O * t i«*vrtcS.

•—

GENERAL REMARKS.

AR3UU7b8BORING NO. vV/SHEET ^ OF

Page 11: Documentin

Connett FlemingENGINEERS AND PLANNERS m

OVERBURDEN MONITORING WELL DATAPROJECT/LOCATION 3Ta_PROJECT NO. 2-7%o-7 BORING NO. M\AJ - 2.OOSGEOLOGIST/ENGINEER »P/K* COMPLETION DATE ~) /DRIUJNG CONTRACTOR Hv> J/J i *~ i- -w. Uo u-. "]> f DRILLING METHODDRILLER "Qov y\j;»gtf DEVELOPMENT METHOD -»V LA *---st

STICKUP OF PROTECTIVE CASING

STICKUP OF RISER PIPE ~ °- I "7LOCK/KEY SERIAL NO. 2 (LZ?

GROUND SURFACE

TYPE OF PROTECTIVE CASING _PROTECTIVE CASING DIAMETER & "DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF PROTECTIVE CASING /£

DIAMETER OF BOREHOLE IN OVERBURDEN "7

TYPE OF FILTER PACKEL.

EL.EL._ < *.G>.*IS—————— u• u_tj——————————————— DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF WELL

TYPE OF RISER PIPE

RISER PIPE I.D

TYPE OF BACKFILL

20.DEPTH TO TOP OF SEAL __ _______TYPE OF SEAL •Oe4nT?>r> i"ht— » / f«»1DEPTH TO TOP OF FILTER PACK 32 ''

2}

DEPTH TO TOP OF SCREENTYPE OF SCREEN _____SCREEN SLOT SIZE &• &2-O 'SCREEN I.D. _________3. /X

EJ —•" " ' "———————— ...i^*^J——————————————— DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF SCREEN

DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLE **

GENERAL REMARKS jULU.sA- >VlrttuOr

BORING NO.

Page 12: Documentin

ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS

PROJECT/LOCATION , f Js r ,QEOLOQI8T/ENQIN6ER V « /DRILLING CONTRACTORDRILLER </? *s,//f yRIG TYPE f- £,/BORING NO. _----x ™»_Lir= ^ - <**' _ DRILLING METHOD

PROJECT NO. <&?J&-?. OO/ SURFACE ELEVAHON JTS . /O TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE '7.0''DATE S T A W T i H x > / x ?<9/ GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Date, Tlma,

DATE FINISHED Z (8/6/9 /> / 3rA.ra.fiDEPTH

SAMPLENO. ftTYPE

BLOWSORROD

HRECOV- JLEOENDlERY

DESCMPTION OF MATERIALS(DmKy; ComMHncy or Mock HartnwK

; We. . . .)JSCS P»

FID REMARKS

3--

"^* -

/ j- cr rrJ"

c/;-sr

/. SCO/?

GENERAL REMARKS.

BORING NO.flB30Q77Q SHEET_/_OF.

Page 13: Documentin

^ Gannett FleminHs3L ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS

\IQ <c

BORING LOG !BORING NO. M\A/-ZOI ^PROJECT NO. ,7L?a?. OO/ -DATE STARTED £/x,/f~>, vDATE FINISHED <£x£> rV *V

DEPTH

40^

K--

5&-E—

SS--E—

4o-:

65-^

•> ~

SAMPLENO. ftTYPE

'*9

ss*

"

/3

S3 *

/J*

43 *

•*•//

BLOWSORROD

'£Z

*£*•

%Zt

&%

soq/y

*Zy

7&-/%

HRECOV-ERY

<£ 0

——

'•%«

LEGEND

>fWJECT/LOCAnON 4*. £ 5 £3-. ^V<=3EOLOQIST/ENGINEER 5>1 ^ /" sZ?<.?jf.3RILUNG CONTRACTOR X - < 4*DRILLER XeVt, A ,//r vW3TYPE sf-£S ' DRILLING METHOD / TSURFACE ELEVATION 5> g1, /O TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE "7 f Q_3ROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Data, Tima, Lavai) (/0/9/5

cra/DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(O»o*ty, ConMwicy or Rock HUDTMH;

Colon CHnKlriilon; «e. . . .)

s-<rj-'aSL' i / c. c, /csVr a f-S/t, X -

/"*>fS/{, -H- s/2-vTs-, f-> /6"

uses

PH>FID

,,

?/, i03J3j£'JL6*<>8)?/t l$£3(., 523. oo S

REMARKS

tL ~Z~~

GENERAL REMARKS.

BORING NO. 'SHEET _2v_ OF __3

AR30077I

Page 14: Documentin

ir tforaiett FlemingJBI ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS **

BORING LOGBORING NO. MW-2O]PROJECT NO. . fifo? OO/DATE STARTED £— 2/1— *?/DATE FINISHED £ - Z.ST - 9 /

DEPTH

-««

75

^MM

SAMPLENO. ftTYPE

JS~*

'

BLOWSORROD

^

%RECOV-ERY

PROJECT/LOCATION c*j- {T.e f /<*GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER OVC^X sfresfDRILLING (X3NTRACTOR > ,«X-» /& ffDRILLER &<,-, *s,//r •RIG TYPE - C./SURFACE ELEVATION £<?% &

DRILLING METHOD KSsSTOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE 1C.Dr .

GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Data, Tlma, Laval) (JO/ ?/<?/> JOZ.O, 51%6 BC8/6/?t, /3sa, fftf f

LEGENDDESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(DwiMy, ComMMicy or Rock HwdfWM:

^ > - x ~>oe>4~, 4//

_^ / / 3 ' .Z/' '~>ar <» -T &t>- '-~>> y*~ (&

uses PIDF» REMARKS

•—

GENERAL REMARKS.

AR300772BORING NO. M.\- '-'-'SHEET.

Page 15: Documentin

Gannett FlemingENGWEER3 AND PLANNERS

SCREENED BEDROCK MONITORING WELL DATAPROJECT/LOCATIONPROJECT NO. >?J?0 Z& O/ BORING NO.GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER COMPLETION DATE £DRIUJhK3 CONTRACTOR DRILLING METHODDRILLER_______/}. DEVELOPMENT METHOD

it——•-> • "<? • 2- 7—————— I.. ,.| ———\—————————————————— STICKUP OF PROTECTIVE CASING 2.1%

EL. 4*12, (0

EL. +7 2, (O

GENERAL REMARKS.

y.

STICKUP OF PROTECTIVE CASING

STICKUP OF RISER PIPE /• & %....

LOCK/KEY SERIAL NO. 3 (L 2-2-

GROUND SURFACE

TYPE OF PROTECTIVE CASING SjVaPROTECTIVE CASING DIAMETER 4 "

•7 ? 7 'TO BOTTOM OF PROTECTIVE CASING *" ° *-

- TYPE OF BACKFILL / T

- TYPE OF RISER PIPE

RISER PIPE I.D. ___

DIAMETER OF BOREHOLE IN OVERBURDEN

DEPTH TO TOP OF SEAL /"/, 3

DEPTH TO TOP OF BEDROCK

TYPE OF SEAL ____

DEPTH TO TOP OF FILTER PACK "J"TYPE OF FILTER PACK ___ "*

DEPTH

TYPE OF SCREENSCREEN SLOT SIZE ____ &•SCREEN I.D. ___________e2

y

DIAMETER OF BOREHOLE IN BEDROCK X-?

EL - -' — ' -~ -~-——— ^LJ————————————————— DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF SCREENEL- —— "~~ —— ——— ^—^————————————————— DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF WELL

DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLE

ur--.nn-^ BORING NO.AR3UU//0

Page 16: Documentin

irjfrjGonnett Fleming\*3K ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS

BORING LOGBORING NO. Af \A/~ p rt / SPROJECT NO. -PL71A7.061DATE STARTED /£ 72£/f /DATE FINISHED t,y3.L'J9J

DEPTH

,T-E

/* -I

/ -E

-fc>-E

-E

•*9 -_30—

3<r~GENERAI__&«

SAMPLENO. ftTYPE

/

. REMARIC^ 1

BLOWSORROD

HRECOV-ERY

PROJECT/LOCATION JackGEOLOGIST/ENGINEER Sba.DRILUNG CONTRACTOR 7). U/,'DRILLER J-/Ar4t~ £/uk<t

« rrtf -S»A- P** 9

'tIf

RIG TYPE M, /* - /SURFACE ELEVATION 5* 7, 8Q

*v- c,DRILLING METHOD //T>?TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE 3O ^ . aV

GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Data, Tima, Lev*) (/£>/?/? /} 10SO; tt6-~< 0(8/6/9<> /3S37 s-x.8-0

LEGEND

« /7<0/f X%/<

DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(Dtxwtty CocvMvncy or Rock HudnMaX

/-/o) «si<- e\J

<n*y S-***»|0

/*f5'

4

rf-tfO ww

U-%« e

-f»43

r

l"

»

C

ItouVr)'.

&,4 of t»r\« € 30'

e.re.0. v^/o Saivf^/i^=?fe ; C i xj-a )', ' J

uses PIDFID REMARKS

•—

-h> A*pti, J° o '' aj

BORING NO. M\Aj'ciChSHEET / OF /

AR30077**

Page 17: Documentin

| Gannett FlemingIQI ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS

OVERBURDEN MONITORING WELL DATAPROJEGT/LCCAnON L/««r .r Cr** S ^ ?<•PROJECT NO. <&7JG?.00/ BORING NO. x*x*4X - <3o/ 3GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER 5VC -»x / rfffsf COMPLETION DATE £x£?&/7/DRILLING CONTRACTOR A6r t/>'~> 4/i6f DRILLING METHOD xyj"xDRILLER A. £s,//f ,/ DEVELOPMENT METHOD Atr-VLLSV^

' U~

EL .5- 7 .•?-£ I

EL. S-+-7. VO ^"VRV& -'t'

\EL ff-£".OS- \

' \

EL. £Bt,?0

EL. j$~2-«f . T<0

EL _^27.r^

EL -5V7.?0EL.EL ^-y-?, ?2>

T —— r

^

II••:•':.'•.••

~~~~— - ———— LOCK/KEY SERIAL NO "2-CLE2.

>> . __ ————— GROUND SURFACE

^/ ——————————————— TYPE OF PROTECTIVE CASING S't«« (7 xH "'J PROTECTIVE CASING DIAMETER *)-

—————————————————— TYPE OF RISER PIPE S f C.

HISER PIPE I.D. <P

————————————————— TYPE OF BACKFILL x> a» -?,/& t*f-*f* /' * -

-4* i /£** s Se + *w r

...,.,,.«. nPPTU TO TOP OP QPAI SC~>

—————————————————— TYPE OF SEAL /fa -» t, /f f//f/J————————————————— DEPTH TO TOP OF FILTER PACK /^ '

TYPE OF FILTER PACK s- T. r * 3nCDTU TF\ W O / C CfOCCKJ f r f3

TYPE OF SCREEN S&ISC

SCREEN SLOT SI2E O. OS O

SCREEN I.D. 3 ''

nPDTLJ TO DOTTO1J f-C Of*DCBM (O 7

nPOTM TO noTTOu OP aonpuni P ^7 0 . O'/*VWK»

rtFNFRAI REMARKS s4>£S*- ^ -rrf<S/ <x X-, >J> ./9X/;-.p Tfe O J9 •/ £/ ' /

BORING NO X ' "-? /

AR300775

Page 18: Documentin

DEPTHSAMPLENO. ftTYPE

BLOWSORROD

RECOV-ERY

£QENODESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(Dtnrtry, CumtKMicy or Book Mtrrtrmi; USCS

....) FID REMARKS

- 6.-/•?

C. _5V-£txVi> <* ~>

so—

GENERAL REMARKS.

AR300776BORING NO.SHEET

Page 19: Documentin

^ Gannett Fleming18 31 ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS

OVERBURDEN MONITORING WELL DATA

PROJECT/LOCATION sl, c .s- <Orr S O»PROJECT NO. >? r07*. <?O/ BORING NO. s 7</ - *3 O ~I?GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER _f> <» - X sf j-r COMPLETION DATE £,/£?•?/'?/DRILLING CONTRACTOR ^ .o/,— sZt fs' T c • DRILLING METHOD X/TDRILLER s9. ^x>xy>,/ DEVELOPMENT METHOD y»,V- <;6tJ-A

|i

EL. •£~3£~, / O ^~>>Rff&£* -'t -

EL r^, /r N

EL 3 1.I&

EL f2HO

EL 3 2 . <

EL. —

EL. .£""/6 • /

I

:|

•M " -5J5 i ._ *.

= 11

:X$::.

~~~" ~—— • ————— LOCK/KEY SERIAL NO 2-<2-?-2-

I PROTECTIVE CASING DIAMETER ^ "

\ —————————————————— DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF PROTECTIVE CASING 2 .. '

ni AIICTCD nc anncuru c IM rn/cnat lanciti 7^ '$^

———————————————————— TYPE OF RISER PIPE / f[C.

RISER PIPE ID. <=•1 y /s / /——————————————————— TYPE OF BACKFILL <T«- ~?f > •* /£ri S* , *

\ " .——————————————————— DEPTH TO TOP OF SEAL ^

—————————————————— TYPE OF SEAL tf ^ f e'/r Xj"nCDTLJ TO TOO OC P1ITBD Da\f*lf 1 *i

TYPE OF FILTER PACK S*7'o - -' f «J

——————————————————— DEPTH TO TOP OF SCREEN C ! £~

TYPE OF SCREEN X^^ C

SCREEN SLOT SIZE {?. £>>Z?O "

'SCREEN I.D «P '"

—————————————————— DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF SCREEN ——————————————————————— DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF WELL -^ 5

nFPTH TO Brvrrnu OF anaBHTM F / x ""*™r™r*

GENERAL REMARKS.

BORING NO

ftR30077/

Page 20: Documentin

PROJECT/LOCATIONGEOLOGIST/ENGINEERDRILLING CONTRACTOR

BORING LOG DRILLERBORING NO. KW-2Q3 RIG TYPE

PROJECT NO. 2.7 3D7. CO) SURFACE ELEVATION ££-<!(•. ~?O TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLEDRILLING METHOD

DATE STARTED 4 / /g 1 9 ) GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Date, Tim, Level)DATE FINISHED 9 1

DEPTHSAMPLENO. ftTYPE

BLOWSORROD

HRECOV-ERY

DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(OtmNy, CoraMMiey or Rock HardnMt;

Color CMmmr-inn: MB. . . .)REMARKS

SS-I

S5-2-

5-SS-3 8-20-

2*4-32.

55 -H 10-32.

10

bS-S 16-27-2-5-32.

2,0/2 .0

26-SS-4 9-9-

/0-/0O.b/2.0

55-7 6-31-lti-8

30-ss-s /. Z/2.0

SS-9 la -24-

"-«-> »x- X 0.0

,><T>f C>zsj-, t

<Sr

^ .X— « cf J'-'i - rx

0. O

o-o

o.o

««

o'-rTO-O

sr? c &>~ot •,«

*se- yjf

f-rc/ /"rym-s /off

GENERAL REMARKS.

BORING NO.SHEET OF

AR300778

Page 21: Documentin

$ft Gannett FlemingS-sIl ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS m

BORING LOGBORING NO. MIV-2T>^PROJECTNO. 27 'SOT. oofDATE STARTED £.[i<* l<9iDATE FINISHED A/2//<m

DEPTH

VO-E

-_

50 -_

SAMPLENO. ftTYPE

S5-M

S-S-J2,

BLOWSORROD

7-13-

too/-i

HRECOV-ERY

/. Z/i.o

/•5/2.0

Tr-

PROJECT/LOCATION Jo-ci 's Cr>«Lk- Sit*.GEOLOQISnEWGINEB <rKjaj-T- 15«jt5.eDRILLING CONTRACTOR <4*x-A, Mul«^- TTU^DRILLER tw>W.Mev(RIG TYPE S-61SURFACE ELEVWTON f4. ~)O

DRILLING METHOD »4A 1 Lvj -« A . e.rTOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE 5" . Q J

GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (DM, Tlm«, Levrt) (s6/7/f/j /33Q; 524>J-(> )(ff/4/9/j S) S~28 3/ )

LEGENDDESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(DMHIK ConHMney or flaek HHtMM;

Color CHiilllcMHn; Me. . . .)

x ,,r .S.r-i,

JV-* (* <7.S *9 tf r- tfc

^ ^ J" » " ? (• CV X *7 Cf •*> •

c*^xx» xw »-» — ^ *- */*.— yC.*• ' '~ *• *J^w ^ Cr t

( T1 ••»• & tf j- *9 & &

j~*«*> # *y <? aoisf

>x

'(<S

'?

uses PN>FID

o.o

REMARKS

• H

••1

•1

——

GENERAL REMARKS.

BORING NO.

HR3QQ779 SHPFT 2. OF

Page 22: Documentin

r£l Gannett FlemingIGH ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS

PROJECT/LOCATION _/«c Xr

OVERBURDEN MONITORING WELL DATA.ff f S*~

PROJECT NO. ?ZJ*O? OO/ BORING NO. '~*~>£' - ? & JGEOLOGIST/ENGINEERDRILLING CONTRACTOR X#-DRILLER ,/?. .'.//f s

EL. - 5T-7. <3-S~

EL. T .'f/ I

EL. ST*f-.~)O ^

-EL. Z'&.eS' N

EL. fit ~lO

EL. SV9,7£>

EL. S"/7. 2-<=>

EL. CTC?i?. «?EL. —EL. ~C7 C? - P2-

5X,« / Sfrfsr COMPLETION DATE ij /r/ ^e >"-> >£>£ ^ ^ DRILLING METHOD xi T fl

DEVELOPMENT METHOD / ./'v. < ^ j a«2_ 1

————

1:;;• ,*

.* *

..•

GENERAL REMARKS A csl/

<•4

I M

•M .

MM

.'

;;;.

~~~— —— ————— LOCK/KEY SERIAL NO -(L "2,7

*>H GROUND SURFACE

- ————————————————— TYPE OF PROTECTIVE CASING <S}~.e<2-f

7 PROTECTIVE CASING DIAMETER 4

1 -? •V' "'

I ———————————————————— TYPE OF RISER PIPE X /x;

1 RISER PIPE I.D. <=^

• TVDC OC D A U'ETII 1 - --. . X* x'x''/' X*"™ -,_-- -1 "7

11 ————————————————— DEPTH TO TOP OF SEAL JL?2 ———————————————————— TYPE OF SEAL *r -, -So -> . /e /*&//£ T J6 ————————————————— DEPTH TO TOP OF FILTER PACK O*O~ '

TYPE OF FILTER PACK x"»% ,-/,-• ^ nCDTU TO TOD OC C/^DCBM ? •? *

TYPE OF SCREEN S&ISC'. SCREEN SLOT SIZE &- O O

SCHFFN ID ip ''

' ncoTu TO nnTTou oc anncuni e . <^ V ""**•

-j, ^ X ;-5 rf*t f ' re/*£ x-, «/ - yif <•/-^

——————————————————————————————————————————— 1

BORING NO -"• Vw -«P

AR300780

Page 23: Documentin

GENERAL REMARKS.

8J3 Gannett FleminJO9 ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS

1fl <

(BORING LOG !

BORING NO. NVu/-2n4 IPROJECT NO. 2*7 "a cn rf\\ -DATE STARTED 6//e <3| vDATE FINISHED 4/19 91

DEPTH

5" -=

/O -

15 -

20 -

Z5 -

3o

v; _I

SAMPLENO. ftTYPE55-1

55-3

'

55-7

SS-8

BLOWSORROD6-38-11-23

I1-M7-

IOO/B

i«4- ii-20-21

6-6-/|- l£

e-!o

/fe-8-

/8-V-7-

HRECOV-ERY2.O/2.0

/-b/2-0

(.4/2.0

I.O/Z.Q

2..0/1.0

1.9/2,0

l-S'/i.o

LEGEND

"RCUECT/LOCATION OicAs.'* CV«.ic5i'->T_3EOLOGIST/ENGINEER j M -f J?< .*«.WILLING <X3NTRACTOR J-tc -A. -3RILLER Do^ \>J 1 1 Ity1K3TYPE B-&ISURFACE ELEVATION 5~60 .OO

Kobtr TUe..

DRILLING METHOD MB) |B, St« A »e -TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE H£ O J

3ROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (D«t«, Tinw, UMi) Z/'V?' , 0<ff0O * - *•; ^(/£>/?/<?/, 123&, 530*39) (ftfafil) Kltf) 53/.-V8)

DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(MnMK ComMMiey or Rock HMkMM;

s **" '

< y fy *JQ si Or 5" * » —f (*" CTC> & 0 S(\S .

^'^ O /

3 / *%j£jL*£ts * t~ *7 "~ O'— <> - «, — d " >t. "7 SKffY

£?S*} S C*** ' ' > - " C/®" &*O rf?/ J ' S s

s *— c* "* *7 0 » * ^ X NX / / } 'f f'f

- i 9*7 ? X 7 ' _

X/ po X ,,,; y^_~, X

^ *x> ~**-#f-fe//.-f-,.J£.f

uses FID

..

REMARKS

-*-'

BORING NO.SHEET / OF

AR30078I

Page 24: Documentin

ENOiNEcna AND PLANNERSPROJCCT/LOCATIONGEOIQGIST/ENGIMEEHDRHJJNQ CONTRACTOR

BORING LOG DRILLERBORING NO. RIQ TYPEPROJECT NO. ??. TO 7. GO/

DRILLING METHODTOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE

DATE STARTED GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Date, Him, LmQDATE FINISHED £ / ?/>/

DEPTHSAMPLENO. ftTYPE

BLOWSORROD

RECOV-ERY

£GENDDESCRiPnON OF MATERIALS

....)JSC8 P»

F» REMARKS

•»-<X

56-*) 2. -2.3

.i

GENERAL REMARKS.

BORING NO.

Page 25: Documentin

Gannett FlemingENGINEERS AND PLANNERS w

OVERBURDEN MONITORING WELL DATAPROJECT/LOCATION . xWyg,- S re*/-PROJECT NO. BORING NO.GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER COMPLETION DATE jL-,, /?./??/DRILLING CONTRACTOR DRILLING METHODDRILLER x r? JL,/S/ry DEVELOPMENT METHOD

STICKUP OF PROTECTIVE

STICKUP OF RISER PIPE ^ "?LOCK/KEY SERIAL NO. 3d2-2.

GROUND SURFACE

TYPE OF PROTECTIVE CASING -X

PROTECTIVE CASING DIAMETER __3."

DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF PROTECTIVE CASING _J3

DIAMETER OF BOREHOLE IN OVERBURDEN .

- TYPE OF RISER PIPE

RISER PIPE I.D. ___

TYPE OF BACKFILL /7Z"

EL. ^ / . <3O

EL. £3&> , TO

EL. S34--OO

EL. —EL. £~/1f&OEL. j5~/?>0&

i%

'• •

* • i

:'•'••.*'

:•';!•

^

••i•••HM

M^•H

MMm

«•"••mMMMMMMMBMMMBMM

Ml

UH

I;/.• •

* •

•£* *;.:

b.*• '

WH

nepTLj Tin TVMI f^c PCAI x 5^

— ————————————— TYPE OF SEAL ^ x» y /41 x V Xj"

TYPE OF FILTFH PACK ' "" f **

TYPE OF SCREEN X?/X£7y .

SCREEN SLOT SITE < - &<=?O

SCREEN ID. c^ *

—————————————————— DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF SCREEN———————————————————— DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF WELL ^/ O '

nCDTU Tn BOTTOM OF ROCIFMm F ^ >? < 7

GENERAL REMARKS. >Jj£ c. fs ~> CT+P*'* 'J* ST C.O ra/r £r &£

BORING NO

R.R300783

Page 26: Documentin

Gannett Fleming GEOLOGIST/ENGINEERI ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS - IQRILUNG CONTRACTOR

PRCU6CT/LOCATION

ROBING LOO DRILLER £. t ,,//r XBORING NO —•*' -— -3^»i«— nna i >r= <^? - 6=>_f DRILLING Met HODPROJECT NO. £??_3C>>? r>&/ SURWCE ELEVATION TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE

DATE STARTED GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Date, Tim*, Levrt) (V<7/?/?/, //

DATE RNISHED C, - 2, S- 47*7.

DEPTHSAMPLENO. ftTYPE

BLOWSORROD

HRECOV- LEGENDERY

DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(0«niNK Con«M*ney or Rook HtrdnMC

Color ClM«leMlen; MC. . . .)uses PID

RD REMARKS

-7

**> •=* 0.7-7

xjf

- 7- • >ccn -

0 s# -,<- V- G

&

GENERAL REMARKS.

BORING NO.SHEET X OF

AR300781*

Page 27: Documentin

Gannett FlemingENGINEERS AND PLANNERS **

OVERBURDEN MONITORING WELL DATA

PROJECT/LOCATIONPROJECTNO.GEOLOGIST/ENGINEERDRILLING CONTRACTORDRILLER

EL.

GENERAL REMARKS.

BORING NO.COMPLETION DATEDRILLING METHODDEVELOPMENT METHOD Atir <!U&

EL 5~f '"7.3________ , ———————————————— STICKUP OF PROTECTIVE CASING 2 ,Z1STICKUP OF PROTECTIVE CASING

STICKUP OF RISER PIPE /' *? 4LOCK/KEY SERIAL NO.

GROUND SURFACE

TYPE OF PROTECTIVE CASINGPROTECTIVE CASING DIAMETER ^DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF PROTECTIVE CASING 2 •"? 3 '

DIAMETER OF BOREHOLE IN OVERBURDEN ^

TYPE OF RISER PIPE

RISER PIPE I.D. ___TYPE OF BACKFILL f~*r~> / <•

DEPTH TO TOP OF SEAL /TYPE OF SEAL ____DEPTH TO TOP OF FILTER

-sf ^TYPE OF FILTER PACK .DEPTH TO TOP OF SCREEN A. ft OTYPE OF SCREEN __SCREEN SLOT SIZE _SCREEN I.D. ______

EL. vj^-.y-r———— ..»;:L DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF SCREENEL. c, ,.,- .u_i..j DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF WELLEL. ^v*.,*> •:;.:.-;-i DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLE 2,2.

BORING NO. -0- 5

Page 28: Documentin

Gonnett FlemingI e&mBfejBEfMft Aun EM ttmm rim ••

GEOLOGIST/ENGINEERENGINEERS AND PLANNERS

DATE FINISHED 6X.7/9/

PRCJKTAJOCATION

DEPTHSAMPLENO. ftTYPE

ORROD

HRECOV-ERY

EGENDDESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(D«n-t» Com-«inc) or Hoc* 1 lirtnoi;

Color nmtmtmtn; «e. . . .)JSC8 P»no REMARKS

s-/ 3-3-

K-F— ~ . t~ i

S-3

S-S- .« <xs ««e exce.

20-

30-

IS"-

GENERAL REMARKS. Jcrce* -

„ „ „ ^ „ flR3007b6

Page 29: Documentin

Gannett Fleming™ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS

OVERBURDEN MONITORING WELL DATAPROJECT/LOCATION JacfcsS Crggk £PROJECTNO. 3.73*37, Q/V BORINGNO.GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER COMPLETION DATE X27?/DRILLING CONTRACTOR DRILLING METHOD

^DRILLER DEVELOPMENT METHOD

El" 5"3 « *""•——————————————————————————— STICKUP OF

STICKUP OF RISER PIPE 2 • 7 'LOCK/KEY SERIAL NO. " C-2.A

SURFACE

TYPE OF PROTECTIVE CASING

4 'PROTECTIVE CASING DIAMETERDEPTH TO BOTTOM OF PROTECTIVE CASING 1.74'

DIAMETER OF BOREHOLE IN OVERBURDEN "? "

- TYPE OF RISER PIPE PV£

RISER PIPE I.D.TYPE OF BACKFILL

DEPTH TO TOP OF SEALTYPE OF SEAL He»fTovnTP fellerk.DEPTH TO TOP OF FILTER PACK If'S"'

TYPE OF FILTER PACK Sgm i fKoV**2.)I TO TOP OF SCREEN ____SL

TYPE OF SCREEN _______P\/CSCREEN SLOT SIZE O> O3£>"SCREEN I.D. _______SLU!______

EL ---»—-'-•? -——— ...H=»^I——————————————— DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF SCREENEU——-g "" -»-J———————u-^_tj——————————————— DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF WELL-L- ———- ^ - ——————•:.-..•.• ——————————————— DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLE

GENERAL REMARKS.

BORING NO.

flR300787

Page 30: Documentin

1 Gannett FlemingENGINEERS AND PLANNERS DRILLING CONTRACTOR

PROJECT/LOCATION __ __GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER <5*»X)Wxi 73, ,

BORING LOG DRILLERBQRINQNO. /•/<*/- 2.O~? RIG TYPE .?-//PROJECT NO. £-73 Q~7. GO I SURFACE ELEVATION 5~4 7- 7 / TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE

DRILLING METHOD

DATE STARTED ~J8J9/ GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Date, Tinw, Ltv»f)

DATE FINISHED •//<»/9// /VA5;

DEPTHSAMPLENO. ftTYPE

BLOWSORROD

RECOV-ERY

£GENODESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(Own** ConiHnncy or Rock HaidMM;

Color rm-n<-in<v «c... .juses REMARKS

S-l 4T-/3-Si-3/

s-a. 7-X.I-

Z8-31

1-57*

S-ff

S-6

30 -_S-8

s-9A8-33

(5.0

, .

C-H-PS*J[ CJy)ao

&.

S--,.

o.o

0.0

(Moist-

_ Sil-h a.**!l*ck

veck Q.O

qUt£.O.O

GENERAL REMARKS. rtSA - »)/>LL.H.7

BORING NO. //Of-SHEET / OF

flR300788

Page 31: Documentin

KQ Gannett FlemingUsD ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS *"

BORING LOGBORING NO. M U - 3L0~7PROJECTNO. 27*0-7 flirt/DATE STARTED ~TJ8J ?SDATE FINISHED

DEPTH

«nj

SAMPLENO. ftTYPE

S-IO

'

BLOWSORROD

/_••*

HRECOV-ERY

0"

PfWJECT/LOCATION tf,_le _CiGEOLOGIST/ENGINEER St>p ],,..,

«•«•_: i4s«, Ti .«<i'ki

DRILLING CONTRACTOR //a // - M/b r HtC..DRILLER A»^i (sJ~,J/e\sRIG TYPE 5-// 'SURFACE ELEVATION 5 7.7 /

DRILLING METHOD tfu<c.rTOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE 4i»<'

QROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Date, Time, Level) f/0/f/V/, /V. 7 -S2Y- 75")(,8/6/W) /S~S<O> 52.6. /4)

LEGENDDESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(D«_ty, ConHMney or Rock Hardrww;

Color. CtaMMatton; MB. . . .)uses P1D

FID REMARKS

GENERAL REMARKS.

BORING NO.SHEET

&R300789

Page 32: Documentin

Gannett FlemingI ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS *"

OVERBURDEN MONITORING WELL DATAPRCJECT/LOCATfON

EL. 5"/7.2/

EL. gD$.1./EL .5"£ T . 2.

——$~1~f- Tfcgrc'——— , i ——————————————— STICKUP OF PROTECTIVE CASING ~

STICKUP OF RISER PIPE ~a- 41LOCK/KEY SERIAL NO. 2-&-H

GROUND SURFACE

TYPE OF PROTECTIVE CASING _PROTECTIVE CASING DIAMETER *°DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF PROTECTIVE CASING

DIAMETER OF BOREHOLE IN OVERBURDEN "7 '

/2/X

TYPE OF RISER PIPE

RISER PIPE I.D. ___

rYC,

TYPE OF BACKFILL G'rau'1'

•DEPTH TO TOP OF SEALTYPE OF SEAL Besrn*;**. S&/eADEPTH TO TOP OF FILTER PACK S~7.S"f

TYPE OF FILTER PACKDEPTH TO TOP OF SCREENTYPE OF SCREEN _SCREEN SLOT SIZE £).O3iOSCREEN I.D. ______3."

DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF SCREEN 3?-j£ 'DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF WELL ___

EL——w w> , • ._,——————— .......... ——————————————— DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLE

GENERAL REMARKS. y

flR300790BORING NO. MW-167

Page 33: Documentin

Gannett FlemingENGINEERS AND PLANNERS

BORING LOGBORING NO.PROJECTNO.DATE STARTED 739XDATE FINISHED 7 /&/<*/

DEPTHSAMPLENO. ftTYPE

M78-10-

/a."

33-40S-fc

S-7

".3-37-3J-,

/o00"

- *

s-S 7-?

s-9

S-IO 3-5-~ 1 »

GENERAL REMARKS.

S-l

S-3

s-s

BLOWSORROD

HRECOV-ERY

PROJECT/LOCATION JZ AGEOLOGIST/ENGINEERDRILLING CONTRACTORDRILLERRIG TYPE fl-4SURFACE ELEVATION 5".5"<9,

DRILLING METHOD ffv<«e.rTOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE

GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Date, Time, Level)

LEGENDDESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(Dw-tty, ComMMtcy or Rock H«rtnm;

B....)uses

8k*-. SiH- **4 Air/i (GlO (Maisf)

<iHtifl_Me

S-7 j.« r< r/ raflf c«»'-

*d -foot. tfuMdeJ «ntv«(.

Vkuae Ji

0,0

O.O

REMARKS

Spacvi MAS uMT,

BORING NO. A/11/SHEET OF

Page 34: Documentin

gft Gannett FlemingK3S ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS *"

BORING LOGBORING NO. M \JJ- 2-6 8

DATE STARTED -xV3/$*/DATE RNISHED ~f/&Je}f

DEPTH

*!*TT

"i

SAMPLENO. ftTYPE

/

BLOWSORROD

HRECOV-ERY

PROJECT/LOCATION Tff6* Cr*_C.Jk _S~/ /XGEOLOGIST/ENGINEER faaJiAL* x3~./v>C_4'DRILLING CONTRACTOR x44r* -.- >4 4*y w r.DRILLER >Qa . t// /V w/RIG TYPE £-£/SURFACE ELEVATION STj? x

DRILLING METHOD x f/»/-TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE J /' _.,_.

1

GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Date, Time, Level) £/£/?/?/, /V35 £23. B

LEGEND

C 8/4/7/j /S~33j S«L1.&9mfDESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(Oomlty, ComMtney or Rock HartnwK

£vxu/ M/a>d1i£>ieo rocx TY«a< v««»cKfs /airoiiTVo ' •••KflVa .c ), "n JtJt,

uses PIDFID

REMARKS

/**••* 35' * » to/I«/|TU S3* < cow«r .

•—

GENERAL REMARKS.

BORING NO.SHEET 3 OF

AR300792

Page 35: Documentin

Gonnen FlemingENGINEERS AND PLANNERS

OVERBURDEN MONITORING WELL DATA

PROJECT/LOCATIONPROJECTNO. 3C72£>-7.£>£>

>*£**BORING NO. MW-Oi&A

GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER COMPLETION DATE 7- 9- <?/DRILLING CONTRACTOR DRILLING METHODDRILLER DEVELOPMENT METHOD .3*.

STICKUP OF PROTECTIVE CASING A- 2.4

EL.

EL.

STICKUP OF RISER PIPE - O, C*LOCK/KEY SERIAL NO. __2

GROUND SURFACE

TYPE OF PROTECTIVE CASING SWI

PROTECTIVE CASING DIAMETER **>DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF PROTECTIVE CASING

DIAMETER OF BOREHOLE IN OVERBURDEN _

— TYPE OF RISER PIPE ___

RISER PIPE I.D. ______3.

TYPE OF BACKFILL & nocr '

DEPTH TO TOP OF SEAL __ _ _TYPE OF SEAL 8e.i*T>>»>/T!f f4.iieT<>DEPTH TO TOP OF FILTER PACK

TYPE OF FILTER PACK _DEPTH TO TOP OF SCREEN 33.5"TYPE OF SCREEN ______fiWlSCREEN SLOT SIZE O. Q3.<O X<SCREEN I.D. ________aL!L______

— DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF SCREENEL *^*"«>^i——————L-y-i^j——————————————— DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF WELL

'.5-'

EL. - -_*"_~_ —————— •;....-.• —————————————— DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLE

BORING NO. M \AJ~ZOt

AR300793

Page 36: Documentin

Gunnell FlemingENGINEERS AMD PLANNERS *"

PfHDJECT/LOCATKJNGEOLOGIST/ENGINEERDRILLING OJNTRACTOR

BORING LOG DRILLER Z2>»BORING NO. RIG TYPE g-

PROJECTNO. SURFACE ELEVATIONDRILLING METHODTOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE

DATE STARTED GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Date, Time, Level)DATE FINISHED 7//'9S

DEPTHSAMPLENO. ftTYPE

BLOWSORROD

HRECOV-ERY

DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(0*_ty. CoMMtney or Rock rtedMw

. . . .)uses REMARKS

O.O

5-31•** V ' * •* • .IMd-VVVC. C_fc ^_> » ^ *W » P^ » V_" > «__> >^ ,* ^k

S-3 r-'A«-

H-73-

a" Ydi<l

Gr«iy/_3/ftC/:

O.O

0.0

S-5-

3o—

GENERAL REMARKS.

BORING NOSHEET OF

AR30079U

Page 37: Documentin

;aS) Gannett Fleming116311 ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS ™

OVERBURDEN MONITORING WELL DATAPROJECTilOCATION 3Z&&.S Cft&k S"/fePROJECT NO. 2 7307, OO f BORING NO. M \AJ - 2 £><?GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER SJvoJie r f fA<Jf,' COMPLETION DATE 7//S/9/DRILLING CONTRACTOR Mlrd,*- /p/tjfas- .ZJW». DRILLING METHOD j3u*e.r-DRILLER 2)e» LU///ty ' DEVELOPMENT METHOD ~4 />_ s £ >

' x_/

fEL.4>5". C& l

£L

EL. x?, 75 ^

'EL. / . ^

EL. & 1 ~? ' S&

EL. 4>(S~, S&

EL. S~-X . -ST?EL. fof, £~oEL. ror, 5"<o

H |

ii:':/;'•::•:

gj _ ^ —————————— STICKUP OF RISER PIPE 2- C5 '

~~~~~~ —— ~ ————— LOCK/KEY SERIAL NO. -3 CL2 2,

%^ ————— GROUND SURFACE

'd- ————————————————— TYPE OF PROTECTIVE CASING __>?«?«/

1 PROTECTIVE CASING DIAMETER ^^

f ———————————————— DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF PROTECTIVE CASING 2.,~!~l'

————————————————— DIAMETER OF BOREHOLE IN OVERBURDEN 1 "

————————————————— TYPE OF RISER PIPE 7?/£

1 "RISER PIPE I.D. /5*.

————————————————— TYPE OF BACKFILL L tf tf/*'/ f -roa-r'

————————————————— DEPTH TO TOP OF SEAL 4

———————————————————— TYPE OF SEAL 1&AtfhlHtTe fe.l/eTSr>^r>TLJ Ty^ Tmn rtc CIITCD n*/"*i _^ '

TYPE OF FILTER PACK Sana ( MortA *££.)

TYPE OF SCREEN PVC

SCREEN SLOT SIZE O . 03.) //r

SCREEN I.D. "3L"

—————————————————— DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF WELL >x5"

nFPTU Tn Rrrrmu OF BORFUTM F /&'/«vw

f3FNEHAL REMARKS

BORING NO. MltJ~2£>

&R300795

Page 38: Documentin

Gonnett FlemingI ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS "

PROJECT/LOCATIONQEOLOQIST/ENGINEER ;— •-..__ ~~" y-"" -nir ff •Tin ahDRILLING CONTRACTOR // ^ - //„!&•

BORING LOG DRILLER 7)*« Lu.tlBORING NO. MVAJ-SUQ RETYPEPROJECT NO. SURFACE ELEVATON

DRILLING METHODTOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE

DATE STARTED 7/V?/ GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Date, Time, Level) ( W?/?/DATE FINISHED

DEPTHSAMPLENO. ftTYPE

BLOWSORROD

HRECOV-ERY

EGENODESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(DonoHyi ComloHney or Rock 1 lofdrmii

Color; CT-iKlr«lon: MB. , . .)JSCS REMARKS

4-7- <a«d[ Si' l-k

*'* «-*S-3

4," S«»vie .s S-J

/£"

/£> s-M

s-s r-//-3-3-s-r

'1

0.6

0.0

S-720 —I

s-s

rode.., .- -A- ———— ...x.. —————— --y,————--y.-., ' "W« r

/ >'

\s o-o

GENERAL REMARKS.

flR300796BORING NO. //(/I/ "<3 ISHEET / OF /

Page 39: Documentin

gftj Gannett FlemingUCaj ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS

PflOJECT/LOCATrON Ji_uc«$ £»**.{

OVERBURDEN MONITORING WELL DATA1 s/Jf

PROJECTNO. 3C73/y7. Oft/ BORINQNO. M\A/~H\C>GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER S/ed fDRILLING CONTRACTOR Mtrd,

Vf ** S

?»toSfr COMPLETION DATE 7/9/f/Vt/iff. 35* C> DRILLING METHOD j4u<te.r-

DRILLER 1)* £*////<y DEVELOPMENT METHOD /!»- <ZU +<&r ^ ^J

™- T / ' v O ———— tmrif-i ID nr marvTrrm/c meihin 2 . 7. £1

*W.«»

EL 36. <?£ \

'

EL -52 7/ 5"3

EL. Ztf. 2LO

EL. St4.'2&EL. Si 3. 70EL. 5V3 , 7d

I ————

si «

? ?

1 ^

'* • *

*•!•••.* * MM

:'*' 1•:'••'••:••.

^-___^ —————————— STICKUP OF RISER PIPE 2-. 14'

~~~ —— — • ———— LOCK/KEY SERIAL NO. <5 C.3 ^

">» ————— GROUND SURFACE

'd- ——————————————— TYPE OF PROTECTIVE CASING Sreel

7 PROTECTIVE CASING DIAMETER *7 '

U ————————————————— DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF PROTECTIVE CASING 2,74'

1 —————————————————— DIAMETER OF BOREHOLE IN OVERBURDEN 7

1 ————————————————— TYPE OF RISER PIPE PVC,

1 RISER PIPE I.D , ck '

1 ————————————————— TYPE OF BACKFILL Ce.l*tertT t$rQUT

1 f~* * J *l1 ————————————————— DEPTH TO TOP OF SEAL _&-&$ —————————————————— TYPE OF SEAL $Z*1*9*Jlk sQ/fel

^ \ /*M ^-nNTYPP OP PILTPR PACK J %Htff LntYit.** A)* in ii -.- -_._.... nCDTt-l TT^ T^D f\C C/ DCCKJ f ^\

TYPE OF SCREEN , PVC.

SCREEN SLOT SIZE <P t O oi <D "SCREEN I.D. "3L ' '

,_ _/__ _«. ncDTU "m ot \ i ii tu r^c cr^DCBM ^ jt ^

———————————————————— DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF WELL 3. 5" -<4 '

nCPTW Tn BftTTOU OF RnRFMTU F 3.5" — /L ''

fiFNFHAL REMARKS

BORING NO. A/ l/J ' _^ /

AR300797

Page 40: Documentin

Gannett FlemingI ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS *"

PROJECT/LOCATIONGEOLOGIST/ENGINEERDRILLING CONTRACTOR y 'e// - J/ts4u»jr. fitC

BORING LOG DRILLER TV,BORING NO. MM-3L11 RK3 TYPE 8-PROJECTNO. SURFACE ELEVATION s5~4 >. 60 TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE ' 39

DRILLING METHOD

DATE STARTED 7/J09/ GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Date, Time, Level) (/ty*?/?/, /V5~dyDATE FINISHED 7 V/0 /<?/TV/a.

BLOWSORROD

DEPTHSAMPLENO. ftTYPE

RECOV-ERY

fGENDDESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(Ocratty, ComiMMwy or Rock Hirdnm;

B. . . .)uses REMARKS

-< VBiMfc\, T-rw.CC Cloy

S-31

S-33-3 3"

//AV

S-3. o.o

2.* 3r alt' Hl*»*lr I'l., n . 1 \:H- f Ittu>If t*l *lf &.&

s-s-

w/e«.TW««i-re,

87-% /A" &wy/&iack w«A.W«»llT%t UVMc

GENERAL REMARKS.

BORING NO.

AR300798SHEET OF

Page 41: Documentin

rJKji Gannett FlemingIIC3H ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS

PROJECT/LOCATION jZd-S £rPROJECT NO. 2.73&7-&G /

a&L:OVERBURDEN MONITORING WELL DATA

r-" JBORING NO. MM~aH

GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER _S5fcd>W /Qnf-AcJrS COMPLETION DATE 7//O/<?/DRILUNG (X3NTRACTOR M&J,* -Mutter J_5r£- DRILUNG METHOD fluaerDRILLER Zte LU.'/k./ ' DEVELOPMENT METHOD At'*- <Z.u *-a*

»EL f~~*f £t f O t? fj*

EL 5 2 , £ 7

EL. 540.60

1EL. 7.7? >

. „ 'EL. &3-4~, £0

EL. $"22 , /<_)

EL. S"/ Z , EL. .-TV/ - ^

EL S"//» £<»

\• * *" • i

•• '

, •

-j

<•4

i

* •

BBl

BB1

BM '*•

mm•mm

— - ———— LOCIOKEY SERIAL NO. c3 C. ,3 -2

^ ————————————————— TYPE OF PROTECTIVE CASINO -_>T /

7 PROTECTIVE CASING DIAMETER ...„ ^ *"

f ————————————————— DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF PROTECTIVE CASING 2. £2'7//

———————————————————— TYPE OF RISER PIPE r'KC

RISER PIPE I.D. l '1 /» -J. /• L———————————— TYPE OF BACKFILL Le l& rr &r6or

—————————————————— TYPE OF SEAL $etffltHjT>. /&/et\

TYPE OF FILTER PACK #*J L/70ri€ "&"<3.)

——————————————————— DEPTH TO TOP OF SCREEN S&S '

TYPE OF SCREEN , , , PVCSCREEN SLOT SIZE , , O, <2 _> "

SCREEN I.D. ^ "

—————————————————— DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF SCREEN 3.8, &

ncDTw m nriTTnu OP RnaPMOi P 3iv"*"••«•'

fSENEHAL REMARKS L . . , _ . . .r . ^ . .

BORING NO. /yiA/- .//

AR300799

Page 42: Documentin

3b Gannett FlemiflJO| ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS

PROJECT/LOCATION JS.c '5 CreeJt Srfe \g GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER -/ oJ, x - cA'

DRILLING CONTRACTOR MA¥.*4,» -MsLt,- 2 /-.BORING LOG DRILLER 2>** uj',//*

BORING NO >fuy ^LISL RK3TYPE ff- £/ f DRILLING METHOD /?v1C.r-'PROJECTNO i73rP oo / SURFACE ELEVATION £-2.7.10 TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE 4« ' _DATE STARTED 7/1 j ?/ GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Date, Time, Level) (/O/9/9/, /&*>, SZ L '5~j MDATE FINISHED 7/3./9J

DEPTH

/O -

']

30-1

SAMPLENO. ftTYPEs-i

S-3

S-fe

s-r

GENERAL REMARI

BLOWSORROD

*~J~

A 1-13-

HRECOV-ERY

g"

a"

£T"

r7

LEGEND

(.8/4/7/1 /5atS", 531*0 7 )DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(Dtmtty, CoraMMKy or Rock Hwdnm;

Color; CtmMnnlen; *c. . . .)

grTAvei. TVa-c< CobblQ. *««/5/x

S uvte <c% S~l *T tcpr (veV w M-Csr

A«.,«-l 6»« i

DlCuCJ£J &*&.\J mCfluiM^fVo V6CI1CStpinOu v\c liM CSTdv cJ So A

uses^

L *O

*O

0.0

REMARKS

Speo -eV 7'

e« 7/a/<?/ /a /a.3/

V ./ c— ' _J* / • \ I/H'S T* If S.

\

<s^BB*

BORING NO M\A/'-2.l

SHEET / OF 3.

AR30013UO

Page 43: Documentin

ODl Gannett FlemhiIC3I ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS

1i .<

{BORING LOG !

BORING NO. ft uJ- 2. | 2 '-PROJECTNO. 2-7 30*7. 00 \ -DATE STARTED "7/J/9/ *DATE FINISHED 7/£/9/

DEPTH

"\vr—

SAMPLENO. ftTYPE

5-8

•S-?

BLOWSORROD

'°9£<r

HRECOV-ERY

<,,.

LEGEND

1ROJECT/LOGAnON Ct«n S C.r«3EOLOGIST/ENGINE£R <£U,aL«3RILUNG CONTRACTOR /AaZZj, -JfllLLER £Utf LiA //«\x1IGTYPE /?«._,/ 'SURFACE ELEVATION -5"2J2, 7 £>

ftW ScV«_

ST l•WC e..DRILLING METHOD >?L**>-TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE J W

3ROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Data, Time, Level) (Xtf/?/?/, /S O 55t/./5}

DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(Dtntlty ContiitMtcy or Hock Hwidnwn

Colon ClMdficalon: •«:....)

——————

uses PN>FID

O.6

REMARKS

J

BM

^

GENERAL REMARKS.

BORING NO.SHEET ,?» OF

AR30080I

Page 44: Documentin

iSS Gannett Fleming1150 ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS

OVERBURDEN MONITORING WELL DATAPROJECT/LOCATION 3Ae.k*l Cr££& Stf)*PROJECTNO. 2~7J?O7;a«O/ BORING NO. frvU-ZLIZt.GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER jSyWy 25 /» c_4' COMPLETION DATE "7J2j<il ADRILLING CONTRACTOR sW/DRILLER 2>ft** M///6V

**..-yXy /«r- _r , DRILUNG METHOD £i,a±r •DEVELOPMENT METHOD3 >!)./>, 5 ujr&e ^

•*" " (_ /

EL 5-2-7, £?

ELJT-27, 70"'-'•WSWJy -'4 '

VEL 5i 7f N

EL 5>/'. "?£>

4*4.2*

EL 4-93. *?x5EL 4 3 . 7

-^ i

* • •

'•:': = '•

III& 7! '

Ufi / a/

~~~~~ —— ~ ————— LOCIOKEY SERIAL NO ^C A^-

^^ ————— GROUND SURFACE

« '/ <irr- 1^76 ————————————————— TYPE OF PROTECTIVE CASING =?T5-_3 17 >4 "7 PROTECTIVE CASING DIAMFTFH ^-

Lf - nCDTU TT\ DrtTTT fcJ rtC DDrtTC/ T1\/C f*AOIKl/l f .1 1

1 ————————————————— DIAMETER OF BOREHOLE IN OVERBURDEN ~7

1 ———————————————————— TYPE OF RISER PIPE PV£

1 RISER PIPE I.D. 2.

1 ——————————————————— DEPTH TO TOP OF SEAL i £

^ —————————————————— TYPE OF SEAL &£*?&* /T? fellAT**a n C D T U TT^ TAD AC ETIf TCD DA/ I ^ 0

TYPE OF FILTER PACK S& H.Of\ *3.)

•' ————————————————— DEPTH TO TOP OF SCREEN .3.3 < S"': TYPE OF SCREEN VC

•'I SCREEN SLOT SIZE O' OAf±> ''I- SCREEN ID. J) "» ~

f JJ*3 -m. /ncoru Trt a/vrmftj /> c C^DCCKI *r T *i

GENERAL REMARKS

^•.._..__ _. ..... _ . .... __............. . ... ...... . ._ - , ———— - BJ

BORING NO AflA/-^ / '

AR300802

Page 45: Documentin

Gannett Flemingl ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS

BORING LOGBORING NO.PROJECTNO. *£? ?J>o2. Qfl/DATE STARTED _£/X /U /<??/DATE FINISHED 4,/S /& . /<?

DEPTH

so

ro —

SAMPLENO. 4TYPE

BLOWSORROD

HRECOV-ERY

PROJECT/LOCATION ,S*e ^ < - > .57 'X.GEOLOGIST/ENGINEERDRILLING CONTRACTORDRILLERRIG TYPESURFACE ELEVATION

DRILLING METHODTOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE "?/: J XX

GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Date, Time, Level)

£QENODESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(DwMttyi ComlKOTcy or Rock HardrwN;

Color; CtMrtfliiBlpii; He....)

>- -" ''tsSf **»'

> > x yr* J--J, /S~>fsS*

> 7 e~* f *i TX^<- / «. J

uses p»FID REMARKS

GENERAL REMARKS £~5ff' 9sf <• / 3~t ~- /f ,#6 ro/Srf^

. //>- t *-iCr ^.^

BORING NO.SHEET / OF

AR300803

Page 46: Documentin

irijl Gannett FlemingJD5 ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS *"

BORING LOGBORING NO. <v*x - J& PROJECTNO. £??_?0-? '. GO/DATE STARTED /i,/'*' sZ? /??/DATE FINISHED /i. Xx x Xx» X

DEPTH

"I

SAMPLENO. ItTYPE

'

BLOWSORROD

HRECOV-ERY

PfKWECT/LOCATION .sZ c 4>s- < -ff _J7r<-GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER *7r, S-,- X- . »/VDRILLING CONTRACTOR X- <»< X^y<-x- rDRILLER ,x5?.r?RIG TYPE -<&3 STZ/SURFACE ELEVATION 5" - 30

XTxXfx-DRILUNG METHOD y*J3vX S - sf%/>~ ./TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE x. ? X"-4

GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Date, Time, Level) (V<? /?/?/, 37 5" 7O ^(.8/6/7/1 / 34 7j S iS.f y

LEGENDDESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(DtraMy. CoralOKWy or Rock IHrdrmi;

Color; ClmlllrMInn; Me. . . .)

«4*-e> f-?

x ~ X / xjX

uses PIOFID REMARKS

•—

GENERAL REMARKS >. e -f,~—i s-rxxs T «9-»^ o Xo

BORING NO.SHEET

Page 47: Documentin

Gannett FlemingENGINEERS AND PLANNERS **

SCREENED BEDROCK MONITORING WELL DATAPROJiCT/LOCATlONPROJECT NO. <&Zr?0?.00 /GEOLOGIST/ENGINEERDRILLING CONTRACTORDRILLER

EL

EL.

ik.

GENERAL REMARKS ___ff ..£*>*- * <* y x «? ^ *?

BORING NO.COMPLETION DATEDRILUNG METHODDEVELOPMENT METHOD ?f> _S -•»,<=•

-> -)<-'STICKUP OF PROTECTIVE CASING *• - < S

STICKUP OF RISER PIPE 2 . S3 '

LOCK/KEY SERIAL NO. ^ C

GROUND SURFACE

TYPE OF PROTECTIVE CASING _PROTECTIVE CASING DIAMETER

SfMJDEPTH TO BOTTOM OF PROTECTIVE CASING

- TYPE OF BACKFILL &-•»?* , /f 1*V*sT

— TYPE OF RISER PIPE ___

RISER PIPE I.D. _______^S~ S*>£ /

DIAMETER OF BOREHOLE IN OVERBURDEN X'/'-X-TC •

TO TOP OF SEALI TO TOP OF BEDROCK XX

TYPE OF SEAL

DEPTH TO TOP OF FILTERTYPE OF FILTER PACK _

DEPTH TO TOP OF SCREEN / T.

TYPE OF SCREEN __________SCREEN SLOT SIZE _________x?. 03 O STCSCREEN I.D. ___________ 1/-s->c4.

DIAMETER OF BOREHOLE IN BEDROCK <?'<•

^——— ————————————— «-"————————————————— DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF SCREENDEPTH TO BOTTOM OF WELL ________x*X.JDEPTH TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLE 5* •/*•/

<g 9fo/e> 3 xjy XT Xxj <? Xxj<? #"

n - BORING NO.AH'JUUbutD

Page 48: Documentin

»———->- Ummmmlmm^m I1-"*"""•""-——-~"——«-««:*"* i >w-* TH7T.__________________I Iuonneii rieming •—•——•—•— -• ' ** r- 'euAi&iecne Aun CM AJUUCBO ^

PROJECT/LOCATION

ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS DRILLING CONTRACTOR

BORING LOG DULLERBORING NO. MW -3O3 RIQ TYPEPROJECTNO. 7J7307. OO I SURMCE ELEVATION 53* 3 ,

DRILLING METHODTOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE

DATE STARTED GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Date, Time, Level)DATE FINISHED 7 / «> /

DEPTHSAMPLENO.*TYPE

BLOWSORROD

RECOV-ERY

EOENODESCRIPTrON OF MATERIALS(Mntty. ConiMwwy or Rock HwdrMW REMARKS

<uA***c/tc« F

J,.

3(5.5

GENERAL REMARKS.

AR300806BORING NO. Af U7-3O3SHEET / OF .~2

Page 49: Documentin

PROJECTNO.DATE STARTEDDATE FINISHED

DEPTHSAMPLENO.*TYPE

BLOWSORROD

HRECOV-ERY

Cr ek Si4g.

GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Due, Time, Level)

LEGEND

s»i-4-

DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(0«r-l» Cum-Mni.) or Hock 1 Hrdn»»;

. . . .)

A S/ixrr

/6.WS4JT

, ,X

JSCS POFID REMARKS

<" — -, T f.-r-

GENERAL REMARKS.

AR3Q08Q7 SHEET _ji — OP

Page 50: Documentin

l Gannett Fleming15-3 ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS *"

BORING LOGBORING NO. /iJ/U-303PROJECTNO. "3T73&7.G&tDATE STARTED 6/Z.&/9/DATE FINISHED

DEPTH

f€) ™

^ "" •™

SAMPLENO.*TYPE

'

BLOWSORROD

HRECOV-ERY

PROJECT/LOCATION JTZtdus &GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER JSV jUnDRILLING CONTRACTOR M* ,*DRILLER £?M filterRIG TYPE j3-Af>SURFACE ELEVATION JT3. 2oGROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Date

LEGEND

r *J( -S/'r xr_> </*< tAj ' //r?. X > /'•?/-/r - Mjiutr- jCt*C, /

JDRILLING METHOD #rr JZo ryTOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE f/,o' j^^.Time, Level) f/o/9/9/} /3.3O, " • •l

(8/&)?/, /4<$3s S~X7.8 JDESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(Ociwtty, CoraMMwy or Rock Hardnwt;

Color; CI-MHIe-lon; Me. . . .)

£*/ fc, r4(". — f Or «T > «=X

O^-oxf"^^ > C. /f, ix* f y'

uses PIDno REMARKS

x-<; - JO ^ k

~

GENERAL REMARKS.

flH300808BORING NO.SHEET

Page 51: Documentin

[Gannett FlemingI ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS

SCREENED BEDROCK MONITORING WELL DATAPROJECT/LOCATIONPROJECTNO._____ 2? -?S~J &GEOLOGIST/ENGINEERDRILLING CONTRACTORDRILLER

• - A

'•-•/

EL

EL. 4, 2.10EL 462EL

GENERAL REMARKS.

BORING NO.COMPLETION DATE 7 - *? - ?/DRIUING METHOD ^ f ^ / / yDEVELOPMENT METHOD

STICKUP OF PROTECTIVE CASING '.£/STICKUP OF RISER PIPE 2,37

LOCK/KEY SERIAL NO. < £tc3-3.

GROUND SURFACE

StauUPROTECTIVE CASINO DIAMETER (J, '*

DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF PROTECTIVE

- TYPE OF BACKFILL ' » •&->/

TYPE OF RISER PIPE

RISER PIPE I.D. ___________x^

DIAMETER OF BOREHOLE IN OVERBURDEN

DEPTH TO TOP OF SEAL _____(Zi.'?DEPTH TO TOP OF BEDROCK

TYPE OF SEAL ____ -, , X X

DEPTH TO TOP OF FILTER PACKTYPE OF FILTER PACK -"

DEPTH TO TOP OF SCREEN ^ /

TYPE OF SCREEN _____SCREEN SLOT SIZE ________£2- O~ OSCREEN I.D. ______________^ '"x

^DIAMETER OF BOREHOLE IN

DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF SCREENDEPTH TO BOTTOM OF WELL _

7*/

DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLE '/

BORING NO. "*J&3ARdUUbUS

Page 52: Documentin

Guwiell FlemingI ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS *"

SCREENED BEDROCK MONITORING WELL DATAPROJECT/LOCATION 3«.PROJECTNO.

EL

EL <# 63.. 2.0EL

JT/.TJ

STICKUP OF PROTECTIVE CASING _

STICKUP OF RISER PIPE _____^. '

LOCK/KEY SERIAL NO. ____^L C 3. ai

GROUND SURFACE

,£/'

TYPE OF PROTECTIVE CASING _PROTECTIVE CASING DIAMETER

S-be.« _ 6€€*

DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE OF BACKFILL

L27'

TYPE OF RISER PIPE

RISER PIPE I.D. ___

DIAMETER OF BOREHOLE IN OVERBURDEN S3"

TO TOP OF SEAL*

DEPTH TO TOP OF BEDROCK __

ce**Tb*f/Te S/tTYPE OF SEAL

DEPTH TO TOP OF FILTER PACK _TYPE OF FILTER PACK Mar,*

A/ A

7/'TYPE OF SCREEN _SCREEN SLOT SIZESCREEN I.D. ____

PVO

x

DIAMETER OF BOREHOLE IN I

EL ( <=,<*.. ^ I=LL —— DEPTH TODEPTH TO BOTTOM OF WELL ___

DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEJ

GENERAL REMARKS

x^a' -& -H,* sL

N°-

Page 53: Documentin

! Guwiell Fleming*"

^ _, GEOLOGIST/ENGINEERENGINEERS AND PLANNERS " DRILLING CONTRACTOR

BORING LOGBORING NO.PROJECTNO.DATE STARTEDDATE FINISHED

DEPTHSAMPLENO. ftTYPE

BLOWSORROD

RECOV-ERY

PROJECT/LOCATION

DRILLERRIG TYPESURFACE ELEVATION

DRILLING METHODTOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE

GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Date, Time, Level) (JO/l/ty //S15J 52S".7O>

LEGENDDESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(Otntttf. ComHancy or Rock H«dnm;

Colon CtM-Br-Inn; Me....)

<y

uses PIOFID REMARKS

/O'/o / Ao/f

-'CO ->f

GENERAL REMARKS <~Sr<? f/*~*> c. -fj~-- **-fs2>t>< r

BORING NO.

AR3QQ8I I—————————— SHEET^OF.

Page 54: Documentin

^ Gannett Fleminglfc3J ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS

BORING LOGBORING NO. Vi'-a.S'PROJECTNO. <???O?.0£>/DATE STARTED &//C* /?/DATE FINISHED X>3? /9x-

DEPTH

9o-_

SAMPLENO. ftTYPE

BLOWSORROD

*RECOV-ERY

PROJECT/LOCATION t xie / <? ffj- . 57x>»GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER ^ Z ><• XI /- / /DRILLING CONTRACTOR X ^ vC x X/-x- x x,xDRILLER «i« x-C~x< rx~RIG TYPE X59' d>SURFACE ELEVATION .f<?£>, /O

DRILLING METHOD S ^ . f?,/, ^TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE ?" . ^

GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Dtte, Time, Level) (/0/4/?/f // 5> 5"J577C« B(&/6/9/> W/4> 5. j |

LEGENDDESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(DtmMy. ConiBBncy or Rock Hirdraw;

Color; ClMime-lon; «c. . . .)

V- .v' > -> CX XX ? '*XX

" «»*- /

uses PIOFK> REMARKS

jgi /f?^ c

•—

GENERAL REMARKS. ,/f

BORING NO.fl D O A r. .. SHEET Q? OFAn3Qua I 2

Page 55: Documentin

Gannett FlemingENGINEERS AND PLANNERS "

SCREENED BEDROCK MONITORING WELL DATAPROJECT/LOCATION . A.PROJECTNO. BORING NO.GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER COMPLETION DATEDRILLING CONTRACTOR DRILLING METHOD UtA / Ai'i~ /&r» <-L,DRILLER DEVELOPMENT METHOD

I "*^——————— I.. ..I ————————————————————— ST1CKUP OF PROTECTIVE CASING 2-J> 2.

EL, Tk,i.L^— LU—— —— —— ——— DEPTH TO TOP OF SCREEN

ELEL.

STICKUP OF PROTECTIVE CASING

STICKUP OF RISER PIPE 2 , /6

LOCK/KEY SERIAL NO.

GROUND SURFACE

TYPE OF PROTECTIVE CASING _PROTECTIVE CASING DIAMETER

Vr<2«-{

DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF PROTECTIVE CASING 2«£>

- TYPE OF BACKFILL r /*&•>&*** ff <9'-o T_/

- TYPE OF RISER PIPE _______*&//£______

RISER PIPE I.D. _____;_____7^"/-y<

DIAMETER OF BOREHOLE IN OVERBURDEN

DEPTH TO TOP OF SEAL _____DEPTH TO TOP OF BEDROCK // ^

TYPE OF SEAL _______x5?<? /of/ Sf

DEPTH TO TOP OF FILTER PACKTYPE OF FILTER PACK _____

TYPE OF SCREEN ______SCREEN SLOT SIZE __________&.. 0£>O *"< •SCREEN I.D. •________ */-/'>(&

DIAMETER OF BOREHOLE IN BEDROCK x

EL *- -I^ —— —— •SJ————————————————— DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF SCREENDEPTH TO BOTTOM OF WELL *?

DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLE __

GENERAL REMARKS ~ ~> -/

„ „ . .-, .-, t n BORING NO.RRJUUO I O

Page 56: Documentin

1 1 Gannett FlemingI"SH ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS

BORING LOGBORING NO. sV^-Ta^PROJECT NO. _xV_?xp 7 00 /DATE STARTED ,3? '/?/?'DATE FINISHED £?////?/

DEPTH

x<C7 -I

^ —

JT» —

# x~_I

J"<2?—

/tf ~

SAMPLENO. ftTYPE

I

BLOWSORROD

*RECOV-ERY

PROJECT/LOCATION ,^xicXj- S r* S -T^GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER x?X,. X , V/-DRILUNG CONTRACTOR X^ <»XV - X,. -3Z,DRILLER 5=?--, X x-RIG TYPE xf-x C? <? DRILLING METHOD // f /sf. J?/* .-SURFACE ELEVATION - 2. 2. TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE ^ X ^GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Date, Time, Level) (gj£/<?/ /4J.4 S~A6.£ ^

LEGENDDESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(0*n«Ky. ConMMncy or Rock HtrdTMH;

Color; CUxMe-ton; me....)

JVe. x , xo X * T x-

XT7AX - oP'O' > X2 - a4£.'/fG/

-»/ J"C'x"x/(«X*7 "X **7*j£r /S

•»X Xv'xj- /^ctT'ftt'?

_ --, x< , x,oX ^ --v 'j-.^" X

G>*vor C. /<5 y f •for'

*~-**> S .ffo' 2 '*y //*~?y,tSe f f0 f-y t f j ^

&ccc*f S&1C. / tf-xVjx jr*y* 5

<_?„ ^ ,£ j ~"VX " r-r™~*f+"*4 e>«?Xtf-xXv- j-f*r~,s*"«•*> X-<-x-^l. - Xx T-"

*r,r<*tj,_, ' -i-eS rrf

<&+*• +-*iy /"***# /o-- fISf'~Js £~o f-) s~r<ta J,~-,

y4> tsf,- -foSS -o ?fss

uses PIDFID REMARKS

d WXx Xfie S*. erf rr+jf.

tx O x > ? ""

«•

"*

GENERAL REMARKS

fiR3008ll*

Page 57: Documentin

nGannett FlENGINEERS AND PL

lentilANNERS

1Iff '

1BORING LOG 1

BORING NO. ,x<9K/- TO £ -PROJECTNO. ??J'0Jf oo / -DATE STARTED •?/?/?/ 'DATE FINISHED /xxX9/

DEPTH

"\

SAMPLENO. ftTYPE

>

BLOWSORROD

HRECOV-ERY

LEGEND

"RCUECTA.OCAT1ON <S, c r3EOLOGIST/ENGINEER / ^DRILUNG CONTRACTOR s$4 -DRILLER <_x?=. -O x'RIG TYPE 4af?t&O SZSSURFACE ELEVATION J-J£ z*£

eT tfjf T 7*i

r x4*i, rT T'«»< - x4J«l '-xX- _^»x/

DRILLING METHOD sf J / fs.. x xi xTOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE f Xj '

3ROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Date, Time, Level) £ gti to/ /t/2 1, S"-2.- 8 1)

DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(DwwttK ConMMney or Rock H*rdn«n;

Color; CtmHIcMton; Me. . . .)

7','x x-.: J:;,

«/

uses PIDFID REMARKS

*'~~'

GENERAL REMARKS.

AR3008I5BORING NO.SHEET rJ OF

Page 58: Documentin

Gannett FlemingENGINEERS AND PLANNERS **

SCREENED BEDROCK MONITORING WELL DATAPROJECT/LOCATIONPROJECTNO.GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER

BORING NO.COMPLETION DATE ?////<}/

DRILLING CONTRACTOR DRILLING METHODDRILLER DEVELOPMENT METHOD

it:——& *T> _____ .. jfl __________,———— STICKUP OF PROTECTIVE CASING 2« 33__. ._• _ I fe . .. >

EL

TYPE OF FILTER PACK

EL. "

EL —EL

X

STICKUP OF RISER PIPE 2, /4

LOCK/KEY SERIAL NO. <3C-«3-%

GROUND SURFACE

TYPE OF PROTECTIVE CASING ">T -> IPROTECTIVE CASING DIAMETER £PROTECTIVE CASING DIAMETER ______________DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF PROTECTIVE CASING 2-Cl

TYPE OF BACKFILL x <6x~-?rfe-7/ /T*X

TYPE OF RISER PIPE ____ — - - —

RISER PIPE I.D. _______

OF BOREHOLE IN OVERBURDEN

E1" y"72'2^—————III ||||_________________ DEPTH TO TOP OF SEALEL Sl4>,'Lt> ______MA Wk_________ _________ DEPTH TO TOP OF BEDROCK ^? S/.

TYPE OF SEAL -Jgo X>,x /f

DEPTH TO TOP OF FILTER PACK X/C

DEPTH TO TOP OF SCREEN

TYPE OF SCREEN _SCREEN SLOT SIZESCREEN I.D. ____

DIAMETER OF BOREHOLE I FJ

DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF SCREEN rDEPTH TO BOTTOM OF WELL f " XX

IL——TT*-"~——————I.-:----..- ——————————————— DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLE

GENERAL REMARKS

AR3Q08I6 BORING NO.

Page 59: Documentin

r fife] Gannett FlemlnUM_ ENGJNffiW AND PLANNERS

1n <cBORING LOG I

BORING NO. S&AS - 30 9 -PROJECT NO. <- yL?O 2. £70 / -DATE STARTED &/S&/9/ vDATE FINISHED ,? /x 9 /f/

DEPTH

ro—_

SAMPLENO. ftTYPE

'

BLOWSORROD

HRECOV-ERY

LEGEND

aflOJECT/LOCATKDN t f3EOLOGI9T/ENGINEER s sDRILLING CONTRACTOR X i-DRILLER .4Z* //fs'1IGTYPE -ifZeSO s&TVSURFACE ELEVATION S~2.f ,-?O

!T X r- j Jx'xi

r x^»x» //^=-X ^ /x l- Ax- Z

DRILLING METHOD x5£fX x-<x x- X^X, TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE 7 " '

3ROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Date, Time, Level) (V0/9/7/, /V5 511 A /*?)(&/6/9/> XSVST 5VU- H ")

DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(D ntty, CoraMMicy or Rock Hardnm;

5H ?51

0- -,- , Xf- /

0-X7X/ r, -xy

f

*' x " ^ ?'~T'*Sft *4f - x> oX .-,«X' X2.,/./ «-<9

uses PtORD REMARKS

_ J Of yf 'f f&

Cp& & X* S~&C "

GENERAL REMARKS a- *-. • /o * s 7 4 , -,£>& x* . 4 , f //

BORING NO.SHEET X OF

AR3008I7

Page 60: Documentin

fib Gannett FlemingaSSK ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS

BORING LOGBORING NO x*5',A-'-v-x;*£? /*PROJECT NO. ? JO 7 • OO /DATE STARTED #//&/<?/DATE FINISHED Xx f/1)/

DEPTH

^

SAMPLENO.*TYPE

BLOWSORROD

HRECOV-ERY

PROJECT/LOCATION ,x£r>£s- xW CGEOLOGIST/ENGINEER xj T ..,yDRILLING CONTRACTOR XX-x-<DRILLER 5?-, s*Z~//r /**RIG TYPE sf-rfg S7~£/SURFACE ELEVATION 0 .70

*/">/ JX.Sf J?C,<r .

DRILLING METHOD r / - $/* ixTOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE »<2 "T" ' - .

GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Date, Time, Level) (/W A ' ^ ^ S2l/ p(.8/&/T/* /-S"/ ) i iA ^

LEGENDDESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(Dwwfty. ComMmcy or Hock Hardnwi;

Color; OM-flritlon: «c. . . .)

/• —. r S >£ -* r- . s nfo/s * /fXV<t«*/

uses PIDRO REMARKS

x" * Xi» <S o/e» i» y'

*

GENERAL REMARKS_______~J-?& c f •''/CWJT S- c. S, y£, x^>^x-____________ n/fS«',/s '

BORING NO.SHEET e OF

AR3008I8

Page 61: Documentin

Gannett FlemingENGINEERS AND PLANNERS

SCREENED BEDROCK MONITORING WELL DATAPRCUECT/LQCATIONPROJECT NO.GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER

BORING NO.COMPLETION DATE ^ /, 9 / $>/

DRILLING CONTRACTOR DRILLING METHODDRILLER DEVELOPMENT METHOD

EL $-5-4.2-0

y.•s.X

EL. —ELEL

>."" TYPE OF SCREEN

TTt&

STICKUP OF PROTECTIVE CASING -- *STICKUP OF RISER PIPE 2 S"4 '

LOCK/KEY SERIAL NO. 3 £.3.3.

GROUND SURFACE

TYPE OF PROTECTIVE CASING _PROTECTIVE CASING DIAMETERDEPTH TO BOTTOM OF I

- TYPE OF BACKFILL c f "^ f ">/ &•? 4t, 4

- TYPE OF RISER PIPE ______

y-s-c <RISER PIPE I.D.

DIAMETER OF BOREHOLE IN OVERBURDEN /ywX

DEPTH TO TOP OF SEAL _____&3. O 4*^X1 X* /DEPTH TO TOP OF BEDROCK x <g -spf r

t /, ,4 s?<Sf/fTYPE OF SEAL _______x5^- /~->,T- /f fff

DEPTH TO TOP OF FILTER PACKTYPE OF FILTER PACK _____

DEPTH TO TOP OF SCREEN 5

SCREEN SLOT SIZE* SCREEN I.D. ______________*£_

DIAMETER OF BOREHOLE IN BEDROCK

DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF SCREEN— DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF WELL ______ °<? 3

DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLE

,„...,. ........ .. ft P Q 0 n a i Q BORING NO. X"*x-.7<?

Page 62: Documentin

iffil Gannett FlemingIE3H ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS

BORING LOGBORING NO. &4f//-/OOPROJECTNO. PjroZ.OO/DATE STARTED -p/SPf/*/DATE FINISHED /y /?/

DEPTH

r~2—

SO —

.~_

-

"I

SAMPLENO. ftTYPE

«y*

-yy-*'

1"S%*-v

BLOWSORROD

~*

XX -XX

X^-xX

"

i'ix. ,

HRECOVERY

x

x-J"

5W

*r*

art

PROJECT/LOCATION /<*c £r ( -ff>/' jf/ >£•GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER /» T . ~ £-/•DRILLING CONTRACTOR ^ ^ X /fDRILLER x f xC/Xx-/-RK3TYPE - O /7~(/SURFACE ELEVATION jf5 . f 7

DRILUNG METHOD / ^TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE «,£>xp - O^^

GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Date, Time, Level) J H

LEGENDDESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(DtncKy, CoraMiney or Rock HvdnMt;

Color; CmilflcMIon; *K. . . .)

y*** *« *> y xxX*^ >x" _ ^ •» * f/S X

*M ? O Or £*\ r ** >

X

Xjr-x/*•

-. X

/

-r T <=X ,=- X xiJ=S x-.'-jr <? X ?C. /

uses

0

PIDRD REMARKS

:;:-.-.-

••••

——

-

——

——

——

——

GENERAL REMARKS . J~->—je>'f-_r <?o//e-c- Xx- gX t xx .

y

AR300d2UBORING NO.SHEET X op

Page 63: Documentin

1 Gannett FlemirIC I ENGINEERS ANO PLANNERS >fl

'BORING LOG

BORING NO. xf X-x2?XPROJECTNO. y*ra>J> oo/DATE STARTED 7/ >r/'sf/ 'DATE FINISHED ?/<yf/J/

DEPTH

f ~

S&-2

x5" —

JO

«?r —

SAMPLENO. &TYPfl

J3"7"/

jj «C5»*

-rs- >

~nr y4

!

j-j- **r

jy "£

BLOWSORROD

xtxX<1

<?»-.&

3?-<,0fj-*

w-y?3f-Jr

/J*~J?jr-3>

>e-£33&-S/

?<&-/?*'%>

HRECOV-ERY

XV x/

X V

&

<?•?

/.-?

<P.O

LEGEND

PROJECT/LOCATION .xS^X^r CV--X JTX3EOLOGIST/ENGINEER ^ 7 ^ X x*/VDRILLING CONTRACTOR x-J<S - *X« f ^ ^ ZZfDRILLER <i5?x7 C 'RIG TYPE sf?S?a sS/2/ DRILLING METHOD sfj .SURFACE ELEVATION <T4/. 4 7 TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE ^X^ '3ROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Date, Time, Level)

DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(Omiiry, ConiMwMy or Roc* HtrdnMt;

Coton CUnlfluiion: «c. . . .)

j-~Sff-/' o "* X -5"xXX, T» «X^ •&u* ~i j*xXX

X CTX O -, j-xXXy C{*?y <?n«-XC V •> txx- X &/~\/

x -J. o/ -~e ~ -~' C /<* X<" X ~J"X //t~s SS J ~- -r „ «e X

X/'- e,. —— , j-x XX •» -i <=X' « -> t- X* ~~

?-+„*/ os*,:* ^ /

-*=__• X 4~0 -? C/-jSf , -TxXX

Axx r / o-"»^,-X "x-jf X^X y /

~o--' o oSfiZ/ &*sf 7

Xp*.~«3 X -. X^J" X;,-, A ff /4ff&

X 'oX oX ^ -- - * X _5_? ' '

uses PIDFID REMARKS

<T*oXXrr r oX_» -Xx

X ^ *>- *-ff". /

<Tc-//rc X'cXcX,- — , j < ~-/-;> • x<-.X , , r-- /= '

C'X'.- JT^-VyaX^-

^ J "3

C- X>-v, J--I ~.JS"'

a? 'j OO T>

GENERAL REMARKS

BORING NO.SHEET X. OF-

Page 64: Documentin

Gannett FlemingI ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS

PfXWECT/LOCATrONGEOLOGIST/ENGINEERDRILUNG CONTRACTOR

BORING LOG D*'LLE*BORING NO. x£x5 - /&J? HiG 1 VHEPROJECTNO. SURFACE ELEVATION

DRILUNG METHODTOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE cPx7 .5"

DATE STARTED P/ay9/ GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Date, Time, Level)DATE FINISHED

DEPTHSAMPLENO. ftTYPE

BLOWSORROD

HRECOV-ERY

LEGENDDESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(OtntttK CondMMicy or Rock Hardrm*;

Cotoruses PID

RD REMARKS

^ /" ~

J-x'XX <To.

JT

70%

X", i, •IY

-f

JO ~

GENERAL REMARKS.sf-r ^ X'-»,.-.«• r£ crc-xx c X- =±*

BORING NO.SHEET X OF

Page 65: Documentin

! Gannett Fleming**

GEOLOGIST/ENGINEERI ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS - I DRILUNG CONTRACTOR

BORING LOGBORING NO.PROJECT NO. 2."? 3/x* 7. O£>/DATE STARTED 7/2. SV1?/DATE FINISHED 7/24 )<?/

DEPTH

X3--I

3o -

SAMPLENO. 4TYPEs-l

s-a.S-3

S--7

s-5

BLOWSORROD

05-49-37vL.O3-13-34-3S

i\*XZ*r*M X*rf • f r~*f <r T*««v

• o */" CP y \ ~<e ceyOT-

17-27-

7-a-

HRECOV-ERY

"/a/A"

PROJECT/LOCATKDN

DRILLERRK3TYPE fl-. '•¥-SURFACE ELEVATION

DRILUNG METHODTOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE

GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Date, Time, Level)

LEGENC

S-5*

S-fe ««.j x« Q rv i «i%««« c «**a .-. \^ . fGo/or

DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(Otmtty. ContiMncy or Rock HWJTMM;

Cotor; rmtMcHlon; Me....)

C -x

uses0.0

RD REMARKS

GENERAL REMARKS.

BORING NO.SHEET OF

AR300823

Page 66: Documentin

fiiS Gannett FleminIC3l ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS

PROJECT/LOCATION JT tJ s £K0 GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER Sr-«jo «*f

DRILUNG CONTRACTOR Ato22,»-BORING LOG D*"-"* £*** <*&•/£./

BORING NO. RM-/O3 RIG TYPE ff- / ———————————PROJECTNO. ?L-1167.00t SURFACE ELEVATION

CA± Zi'-k'f-L f f.Lr

Hvber. JJiC.

DRILUNG METHOD /?IJa,e.rTOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE J fo ' . .

DATE STARTED /IsVf/ —————— GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Date, Time, Level) ^ jDATE FINISHED 7/2-tJ'?/

DEPTH

-J

"J

SAMPLENO. ftTYPE

S-?

S-yd-

S-ll

ORROD

Q-I5-

24-37-

RECOV-ERY

w'

LEGEND

1

~ ^DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(0*n*ky. CoraMMwy or Rock H*rdn*n;

Color; CltMHIetllon: Me. . . .)

£ro.y/ $ro>*"i V€»y WiA'tww*

j_!.Oi& 4-T S& '

A S pdCTic

t-ceUv

r

uses PIDRD REMARKS

1_

GENERAL REMARKS.

BORING NO.ASHEET OF

Page 67: Documentin

titt Gannett Flemiit*~3ll ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS iq

BORING LOGBORING NO. /Tx XX- /& yPROJECTNO. ?7 roJ oO/DATE STARTED / 6/fXDATE FINISHED t?f/£>.<i X?/

DEPTH

r —

/a — i

SAMPLENO. &TYP|

&~

3*

BLOWSORROD

1

i«X

«a?-«?>z

HRECOV-ERY

^

-

LEGENC

PROJECT/LOCATION tLC s C ef •GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER ^ > 'DRILUNG CONTRACTOR ^$4 -DRILLER <x ., xO x-x-RIG TYPE j rfO x x7SURFACE ELEVATION &£"?. ST4-GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Date

r x "-» X'7's»x; x . Xx x - ?>

DRILLING METHOD x CT- ,TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE / 3 ', Time, Lavol)

DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(Dcrnlty, Consistency or Rock H*rdn«u:

Color; Clauiflcation; MC. . . .}

i;f::

= ~ <3"'y *

uses PIDFID REMARKS

2: /5' - '

o" s -fc. -7

c •<>-»••> •y*-*f?/tf

GENERAL REMARKS siffiSt~, -">e< ^Jf JTA— et, ,/.,

BORING NO.

AR300825

Page 68: Documentin

DATE STARTEDDATE FINISHED

GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Date, Time, Level)

DEPTHSAMPLENO. &TYP

BLOWSORROD

RECOV-ERY

LEGENDDESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(Otiuity. Con«l«»ncy or Rock Hardrw**;

Color: Cludfluilon: «tc. . . .)uses PID

FID REMARKS

£0 —

,<sXx<6<-xS'Xx>_r

/.oXT'

xJVx-"

xlxc

XIXO /0 ^

<?-"<• jxc^-j^j"* £s »txr" X. r

GENERAL REMARKS '•,~i g e.-*-> X - X-X , - ^ /%' ,-,e£ <ae^<f<r— r , J~*~sy/r

AR3QQ826BORING NO.SHEET __X_ Of-

Page 69: Documentin

Gannett FlemingENGINEERS AND PLANNERS

BORING LOGBORINGNO.PROJECTNO. 3.7367.DATE STAffTEDDATERNISHED

DEPTHSAMPLENO. ftTYPE

s-sr3? -

37 -

S-7 V-5--f-S"

s-a V-GENERAL REMARKS.

S-3. 3-1- >5L" J, ., ;„ , . , , J IraCK

W

8"

ORROD

y/-//

HRECOV-ERY

LEGEND

PROJECT/LOCATIONGEOLOGIST/ENGINEERDRILUNG CONTRACTORDRILLER £**SURFACE ELEVATION S£ 3.7 TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE

DRILUNG METHOD

GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Date, Time, Level)

DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(Owntty, ContMmcy or Rock Hardmw;

Colon CUMHIc-lon; Me....)

and red X."/ /XJTS tff 6*ot}r)

foci-. Tm««i*t'*' , •f *ce C-K-P"

0.0t,f{/ />«ce -6*c* -<« «xi C*-»-if J

J^> —

uses

0-0

0-0

d.O

REMARKS

35-?: e

BORING NO.SHEET / OF

AR300827

Page 70: Documentin

I Gamett Fleming_ GEOLOGIST/ENGINEERENGINEERS AND PLANNERS ~ DHILUNG CONTRACTOR

PflOJECT/LOCATKDN

BORING LOG DRILLER J>.« Ld.'Jle.BORING NO.PROJECT NO. SURFACE ELEVATION

DRILUNG METHODTOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE

DATE STARTED 7/8/9I GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Date. Time, Level)DATE FINISHED 7/J.

DEPTHSAMPLENO. ftTYPE

BLOWS'ORROD

HRECOV- LEGENDERY

DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALSCoMMwwy or Rock Hwdnwi;

Cote; Cl«»-nciUon: Me. . . .)uses p REMARKS

8 -s

00

GENERAL REMARKS.

AR3Q0828BORING NO.SHEET ^ OF

Page 71: Documentin

Gannett FlemingI ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS *"

BORING LOGBORING NO.PROJECT NO.DATE STARTED 7/3.&S9 /DATE FINISHED

DEPTH

25-- •

SAMPLENO. ftTYPE

s-a53 3S-

s-3

S-S"

BLOWSORROD

9-7-7-/O

HRECOV-ERY

LEGEND

2.O"*\r ^ __ "~\ ~* __* ~" / r^ - - - - - , -_- - . . ,.. _.Sorne ^rAve(v rviace

/a"

PROJECT/LOCATIONGEOLOGIST/ENGINEERDRILUNG CONTRACTORDRILLER

SURFACE ELEVATION SS&.-J-J TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLEDRILUNG METHOD

GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Date, Time, Level)

£-8-e-s&W*v

K-

DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(DwKMy, CgnilMinc/ or Rock Harden**;

Cote; Climncillon; Me. . . .)uscs

red.

0.0

0-0

REMARKS

GENERAL REMARKS.

BORING NO.SHEET OF

AR300829

Page 72: Documentin

Gannett Fleming**

GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER j-r*s}nesi _ n*--ai\ ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS — *————————————————?T«V7ffg/7——/^Ifffai

PROJECT/LOCATION

DRILUNG CONTRACTORBORING LOG DRILLER

BORING NO. ftjj- RIG TYPEPROJECT NO. SURFACE ELEVATION

DRILUNG METHODTOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE

DATE STARTED 7/3 9S GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Date, Time, Level)DATE FINISHED

DEPTHSAMPLENO. ftTYPE

BLOWSORROD

HRECOV-ERY

LEGENDDESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(Dwutty, Comtottncy or Rock Hardnm;

Colon Cm-He-ton; Me....)uses RO REMARKS

•s-f

s-a. ,,___,__1 t'-f'

so-3S-3

S-H

s-r

/0-/S-

6-3-

3-9

-20:

GENERAL REMARKS.

.<c»-^. **-»s rrvwwj (•*-> C-vckaV) J

o-o

C-K-FS*-«L

BORING NO.

AK3U0830SHEET _L__ OF.

Page 73: Documentin

8iS Gannett FleminI"JI ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS

PROJECT/LOCAnON 3 'f <!.ig GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER - .rJi

DRILUNG CONTRACTOR Jt/J+J,*-BORING LOG DRILLER _&M &J.-//

BORING NO. #//- /&A HIP IVPE B-&* ___________PROJECT NO. ;{W£9. <*>/ SURMCE ELEVATION

-**£ *tf rjy_ ,, tzj.-s4/-b*r 3c*e-

DRILUNG METHOD ftuaf.?TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE W-W'

DATE STARTED "7 ._U97 ~~~ QROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Date, Time, Level)DATE FINISHED *7S2.5'J'9f

DEPTH

-j«r-

-j

SAMPLENO. ftTYPE

-5*

BLOWSORROD

*•&!/_*

' HRECOV-ERY

-r""

LEGENO

-4<-

DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(D«M«y, ConilMincy or Rock HMrww;

Cote; rtMttflcBiion *ie. . . .)

gfcciJ£s*.y V&ry weA.-fiver-eJL rock

W // MC9r *' ^ T*j">TjK ierf n ff ? £ttf&''Tf'f

\fPC I 'tff PTtfdJL -** ^ &S >Jf ffC. J<i **t£S*mtjt P

uses

'

tf£)F»

...

0.0

REMARKS

GENERAL REMARKS.

BORING N O . - -SHEET A. OF AAriJuUdJ i

Page 74: Documentin

fiiS Gannett Fleming(€11 ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS *"

BORING LOGBORING NO. /r2fx</- /O JPROJECTNO. *£>?L?a-? GO/DATE STARTED ?/tpy/t/DATE RNISHED ? fc*/1/

DEPTH

J' —

"\_

SAMPLENO. ftTYPE

-

**"

,SS*J>

BLOWSORROD^

'&'';?C '

V0/0>

HRECOV-ERYXlx-xi'

x

o

PHOJECT/LOCAnON /4<r/<r &-rr - Jfs/fGEOLOGIST/ENGINEER xx f ,?-„., £j-DRILUNG CONTRACTOR ^ . £f DRILLER >^>Cxx^xxRIG TYPE X - g? /l/SURFACE ELEVATION *55~. 9*

DRILUNG METHOD x CfxTOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE / 7 ? -/-' —

GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Dcte, Time, LeveO ^ B^ ^ "i

LEGEND

^DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(Dtntty, ConMttncy or Rock HwdnMf ;

x «O •"'• " e •*. •**> sJ"*- X/ •%-" ' /i

J"**-T 3» -r**-mf C^ &••"* >**• f ' S C

' JW^eX

uses PIORO REMARKS

* —7

*

-

^

GENERAL REMARKS ______ ?£.'fr <z/***•£ ^/r JT<4 osr-j- , J%<pX (_•'<*•"-.

'AR300832BORING NO. -SHEET _jl_ OF.

Page 75: Documentin

Gannett FlemingENGINEERS AND PLANNERS *•

BORING LOGBORING NO. x>2fy- XX2?PROJECT NO.DATE STARTEDDATE FINISHED

DEPTH

ay

SAMPLENO. ftTYPEJS'*'X

BLOWSORRODso-?

HRECOV-ERY

/.#'

PROJECT/LOCATKDN X ./ ( rr J~, Xx*GEOLOGIST/ENGINEERDRILUNQ CONTRACTORDRILLERRIG TYPESURFACE ELEVATION £~3 f,

DRILUNG METHODTOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE

GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Date, Time, Level)

LEGENDDESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(DwwMy. Con* Honey at Rock Haianm.

Cote; amKlcrton; •-....)uses

AxxX<

,—> /f<=/<s*r

'-+

PIDRD REMARKS

—, '/

GENERAL REMARKS.X -

BORING NO.______^^________ SHEET X OF.AR300833

Page 76: Documentin

Gannett Fleming '——"""-- -""ff""' "r* 'wr*—————————'e&iAikjnsBe Akin at Auuenct •*ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS

PROJECTAIXXnON 3Zs£>t< ^_ __ _.GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER 57 /iA. 15 7 27DRILUNG CONTRACTOR

BORING LOG DRILLER 80 „BORING NO.PROJECTNO. a73g>'7><?O/DATE STARTED/7/fV

SURMCE ATION ££DRILUNG METHODTOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE

GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Date, Time, Level)DATE FINISHED

DEPTHSAMPLENO. ftTYPE

BLOWSORROD

RECOV-ERY

LEGENDDESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(OwiMy, CoraMMicy or Rock HirdnMt;

Cote; CMMMcMfcn; «c....)uses REMARKS

j

s-a /ST-/0-

-fro sr-'H:S-5

S-6 no rTaaoe O.O

GENERAL REMARKS.

BORING NO.

AR300831*SHEET OF

Page 77: Documentin

Gannett Fleming1 ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS B

PROJECT/LOCATION

BORING LOGBORING NO. BH-/J(PROJECTNO.DATE STARTEDDATE RNISHED

DEPTHSAMPLENO. ftTYPE5-7

TO

S-8

S-9<Ay«j.fUereiTv«:\c

33-4*

BLOWSORRODS-tf-

as-

HRECOV-ERY

13.

DRILUNQ CONTRACTOR //*?.DRILLERRIG TYPE . _SURFACE ELEVATION

DRILUNG METHODTOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE S"1

GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Date, Time, Level)

LEGENDDESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(Dtrmry. Cornlmncy or Rock Hirrtnm;

Cote; a«Minc»Hofi; Me....)

Si i-h; fVxa re (Tk' r>««.4

voc--U. -

6? 5 '

uses

o.o

o.o

REMARKS

GENERAL REMARKS.

BORING NO.SHEET OF

AR3QQ835

Page 78: Documentin

tti Gannett FleminISlI ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS

PfKDJECT/lOCATKDN J '5 Cre.eJf J"fVg GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER S~- yJ,ff, f& oski'

DRILUNG CONTRACTOR Mtr-J.,* - /fulatr T*<L,BORING LOG DRILLER 8*« /£//*,-

BORING NO Wyf HZ -—RIG TYPE 8-8O DRILUNG METHOD /?*><Ser J #,r tieta.pROJFCT uo ttScrTOQ 1 ————— SURFACE ELEVATION &%7. ?4 TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE J£~% ' ^LDATE STARTED * //ffj9/ ~~ GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Date, Time, LeveO BDATE FINISHED 6/JSy\

DEPTH

r -_

/o —_

xr-E

C"-I

SAMPLENO. ftTYPE

S-i

3-3

S-5

S-6

BLOWSORROD4,-to-

s-t>-

/8-3S-

35-30

'7s-ie L

HRECOV-ERY

CACunDESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(DvfMtty, ConalMncy or Rock Hartntw;

Cotor HMitflr^inn; «c. . . .)

Bt&C/C/GTBty Sit? \Srs6j bsjfJTCc&.v?e. * PTittf 2-ecwoa ( D****yOJ* r 1•JCL ff C. £c>9 d*" 1

/f4*i/ tfK < J

/5J£l_Cj f /v* *•&. \J ^^< f • ffffaj \ W H IT£

^ <ft-Hd -* ^ -S • LTtC. Q t C*

o c: c*jA**Vt tf i -* ~* "

* *r

|Af«4B PIDRO REMARKS

J

GENERAL REMARKS.

BORING NO. W>4 -//ASHEET / OF P^

Page 79: Documentin

HiS] Gannett Flemtal&S) ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS

1a <«BORING LOG i

BORING NO. WA-?l3k '-PROJECTNO. 3L"73<y7,<3<9( -DATE STARTED £//g/9/ vDATE FINISHED <

DEPTH

#Z

66— _

4

SAMPLENO. ftTYPES-7

S"8*

s-//

S-J3

GENERAL REMARK

6/25V9/BLOWSORROD

*5

HRECOV-ERY

3"

LEGEND

»ROJECT/LOCATION J«.C<fe%i Qrff . C'Vi»3EOLOGIST/ENGINEER SJtyJlCM ftincp<ile.',DRILUNG CONTRACTOR M J] _ xVl/2e*- 7,xiDRILLER /5 f y v/Xfr*IGTYPE S-AD DRILUNG METHOD 0u<zfr J &,*• Ba-br^>SURFACE ELEVATION £B7, 3 H TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE 7 _; f3ROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Date, Time, Level)

DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(pwnltK CoMMMiey or Rock HwdmM;

£ nw/firwuAf St'fr ei*a H-fSnno

l-t-P1 S«.«« liArVAe -ve-w* A "ife

jL/'fifi' -*«l.y 5l rr a. HO. Tfli«ly- .t>«xi(dLe<i **K .r»i \rock« li KC MuOtirva

BVc.c.K./S'o-'** SAV CftsWJ <I«GLV yrk. <acx-V^lcc. vwwc t-usjk Qry)

OM C rou vici v_.v L t tV-)fya*j*\JTAiA/ Kt& Clay «.•*& S'/TSoMte C-K-F S« ^ 7T*«e >K*.VC!

* * * |"J

£Z \fL 0 S ^ '

uses WDRD REMARKS

-yr '«.*«/ V3.'

*<" 1 11. _C 1 L/ L_ <: o(S "< 'Ut»" Olv"T — fixVMyt V€T\> fll blo**> f*>iAY£ fflS "tS--i mr -77 _ M Tfiu \

BORING NO WA '/'A.

SHEET 2 OF ?>

« H

-

-

AR300837

Page 80: Documentin

IffilGomett FlemingICail ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS

OVERBURDEN MONITORING WELL DATAPROJECT/LOCATION lick Cr«ek S'A*PROJECTNO. 1730700 /GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER Shfb*DRILUNG CONTRACTOR /AuW,*DRILLER Bt* £„!/*-.

n

EL.

1<«- __ «

'""WM y -'4 '

1

PI

EL.

EL.

, EL.ELEL.

BORING NO. VVA-/JA.L^

taski COMPLETION DATE t/2&/1l ^Ws r«<L DRILLING METHOD >&<jer//ftr Be+i-ry M

DEVELOPMENT METHOD — ^ i

i ———

I•IS

«•4

m

M

MM

'

'::':T:

"~~~ ~~ —— — ———— LOCK/KEY SERIAL NO. M>*C,

** f*or\t iMn 01 IDCA/ C

'd- ———————————————— TYPE OF PROTECTIVE CASING M«"*e

/ PROTECTIVF CASING QIAMETPR ——

| ————————————————— DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF PROTECTIVE CASING ——

1 ————————————————— DIAMETER OF BOREHOLE IN OVERBURDEN & '

1 —————————————————— TYPE OF RISER PIPE PVC

1 V1 RISER PIPE I.D. eJL

1 ————————————————— TYPE OF BACKFILL KJovt ,

. 'I ———————————————————— TVPJS OF SFAL , J <>t_.&_

2 ————————————————— DEPTH TO TOP OF FILTER PACK rf 5"*

TYPE OF FILTER PACK S«Vl<i (ti~<f l€ i)

——————————————————— DEPTH TO TOP OF SCREEN 4 7'

TYPE OF SCREEN P\/C

SCREEN SLOT SIZE Q.O2.O "

SCREEN I.D . 5-*

I ——————————————— nPDTu *m nnnnu nc onneurM c <~2 '

GENERAL REMARKS «a rv J»N j»h , v x-v A. x*. BOPING NO W r\ - | 1 1

Page 81: Documentin

Goiwett FlemingENGINEERS AND PLANNERS v

BORING LOGBORING NO. VA/A-H3PROJECT NO. .37307. OC> IDATE STARTED £/2.Oj9/DATERNISHED

DEPTH

JO —

SAMPLENO. ftTYPES-l

s-a

S-5-

BLOWSORROD

6-7-

(,1-t.S-

HRECOV-ERY

LEGEND

/Z"

1C-HQ-w^ • «.

M-P

45-50-

PROJ6CT/LOCAT1ON J'ials's CjneeJeiGEOLOGIST/ENGINEERDRILUNG CONTRACTOR jU'Jlit.DRILLER10 TYPE S~

SURFACE ELEVAT10NDRILUNG METHODTOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE S~3 '-•</

QROUNOWATER OBSERVATIONS (Date, Time, Level)

DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(OWMtty; ConMMMicy or Rock HirdmM; USCS

Color. Ctta-HrMlon; He....)

;.&)*•«/>)

_ f (***£)

•Aa.ce

PIDRD REMARKS

GENERAL REMARKS.

BORING NO. W4- I <3SHEET / OF g^

Page 82: Documentin

PROjeCT/LOCATIONGEOLOGIST/ENGINEERDR.LUNG CONTRACTOR

PORING LOG DRILLER

BORING NO. \JJA- 113 RIG TYPE t$-&O

PROJECTNO. 3_T*>G7.6G/ SURFACE ELEVATION 5»2. S'ODRILUNG METHODTOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE

DATE STARTED GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Date, Time, Level)DATE FINISHED

DEPTHSAMPLENO. ftTYPE

BLOWSORROD

HRECOV-LEGEND)ERY

DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(DwMttyi CantHHnty or flock HardnMt;

Cote; Cm»Mrtllon: «e....)uses PIO

FID REMARKS

S-7 -fa*

S-//*H toi,

52>H s-13BS--

^ 30-

S-IM /ar .H-F'S'.ud,

GENERAL REMARKS Sim'tk*- 5p!'T- ftrYUl VT ^ i M** rxy.uTp

BORING NO. WA- H3SHEET ^ OF .3.

Page 83: Documentin

| Gannett FlemingUGH ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS

PROJECT/LOCATION T C 'i firPROJECTNO. 3LT5A-7.06J

*fikJ

OVERBURDEN MONITORING WELL DATA

sl-V*BORING NO. WA-H3

GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER S+*Oit£*« H.ur/x\Lr COMPLETION DATE A/2.//9/DRILUNG CONTRACTOR /fa Ttii- Muter. T.c, DRILUNG METHOD vdL^rDRILLER S^t Puller ' DEVELOPMENT METHOD ——

EL.

EL

^

.EL.

EL.

EL.EL.EL.

ll

* • ^H • '

•*• mm

:::/::•::^AURUHt

up - -< /'

~~~~~~~~~ —— ———— LOCK/KEY SERIAL NO A/0*C.

•jJ- ————————————— TYPE OF PROTECTIVE CASING NJo- <.

\J PROTECTIVE CASING DIAMETER ———

f —————————————————— DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF PROTECTIVE CASING ——y

———————————————— TYPE OF RISER PIPE PVC

n •«RISER PIPE ID <*.

—————————————————— TYPE OF BACKFILL N0 -

———————————————————— DEPTH TDTOP OF SEAL „ T1._M_ ,„, .,

—————————————— TYPP ne SFAI A"'?nffTDTU TH IT O /%C C1ITCD DAf*lf ^ *

\

TYPE OF FIIT B PACK , , S* A (Mofic "*__...._. nCDTU TT TT\O f\B CODCCIU rt

TYPE OF SCREEN f?VC

SCREEN SLOT SIZE 5' O 2lO "SCREEN ID ^. "

-.___. __ BO,-.,,.,, o- crpccM -^ ? '

—————————————————— DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLE £$-*{"

GENERAL REMARKS fi»riHC RU*^ Vwv"H\ D**.Tfc»».\fc Dfc\lC.» TvVa*** S"3'-V TO f 5 ' »r)J«A«r ~ -&

kvArJt-«. (a«u.-i»M.>.W •H.* si«.«.A Pvo-, 45" fa /3'' x

•~

B D O n n O I , BORING NO W/\- / G

Page 84: Documentin

ENQMHtRS AND PLANNERS

PROJ6CTAjOCAnONGEOLOGIST/ENGINEER x r , /yDfMLUNQ COfrrRACTOR

BORINQLOG DRILLER ^ ,<://*BORING NO. RETYPEPROJECTNO. SURFACE ELEVATION & 2 .

DRILUNG METHODTOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE

DATE STARTED GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Date, Time, Level)DATERNISHEO

DEPTHSAMPLENO. ftTYPE

BLOWSORROD

HRECOV-ERY

JEGENDDESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(DmiHK ComMwey or Rock H*rdrw«;

. . . .)uses PK>

FID REMARKS

r S

7-ff- *o/sr

GENERAL REMARKS. -,<5/ */'SlP t **> ~-> S x*"" dxJx»xjX *S

BORING NO.SHEET ./ OF.

Page 85: Documentin

\UM Guwietl FlemiiiIS-sffl BKJJNTOW AND PLANNERS

1fl <1BORING LOG <

BORING NO. 6*6/- //5~ -PROJECT NO. <???o?. OO/ -DATE STARTED P/J /I/DATERNISHED y /&j_/_fs

DEPTH

r —

/n~~—

SAMPLENO. ftTYPE

J3--X-

*»-_?

*£'

BLOWSORROD

x V

xy—X/

^

*f 7**3 •*

Om^ ~ s&

HRECOV-ERYXlxx/

/—

LEGEND

»ROJ6CT/LOCAnON , >,- r--x> - r: x.3BXOGI8T/ENGINEER x , ,:,/DRILUNG CONTRACTOR x£xi-DRILLER . //es-VQ TYPE x fc? 7ri/rSURFACE ELEVATION ^ «?. /

a/,±S AL J+ xx-

DRILUNG METHOD x£3"xTOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE />* - /

3ROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS (Date, Time, Level)

DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS(D«m» ComlHincy or Hock mrdn«M;

COHXI dMMflCfltfOflt MC* « • «)

X ' X

•»oX p if f/ Xx> , a/ -y

~ic/ oS f*-s' j efjS / - Xx

uses WDFID REMARKS

J" - yO X> O/ <Pfc »^

. -X'x'"*/' /

GENERAL REMARKS

BORING NO.SHEET x- OF

AR300843

Page 86: Documentin

A-2

Slug Testing

AR3008H

Page 87: Documentin

A-2

Aquifer Testing

AR3008lr5

Page 88: Documentin

A Q T E S O L V R E S U L T SVersion 1.10

10/23/91 12:49:56

TEST DESCRIPTION

Data set........... JCF200S.DATData set title..... FALLING HEAD SLUG TEST OF MW-200S

Knowns and Constants:No. of data points.................. 34Radius of well casing............... 0.083Radius of well...................... 0.29Aquifer saturated thickness......... 13.69Well screen length.................. 10Static height of water in well...... 13.69Log(Re/Rw).......................... 2.885A, B, C............................. 0.000, 0.000, 2.113

ANALYTICAL METHOD

Bouwer and Rice (unconfined aquifer slug test)

RESULTS FROM STATISTICAL CURVE MATCHING

STATISTICAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

Estimate Std. ErrorK - 3.3256E-003 +/- 6.6493E-004yO - 1.0281E+000 +/- 9.6394E-002

ANALYSIS OF MODEL RESIDUALS

residual - calculated - observedweighted residual - residual * weight

Weighted Residual Statistics:Number of residuals............... 34Number of estimated parameters.... 2Degrees of freedom................ 32Residual mean..................... 0.008854Residual standard deviation....... 0.2107Residual variance................. 0.04438

Model Residuals:

Time Observed Calculated Residual Weight

Page 89: Documentin

0.0166 1.899 0.9725 0.9265 I0.025 1.023 0.94554 0.077463 10.0333 0.966 0.91963 0.046368 10.0416 0.508 0.89444 -0.38644 10.05 0.745 0.86964 -0.12464 1

0.0583 0.606 0.84581 -0.23981 10.0666 0.685 0.82264 -0.13764 10.075 0.552 0.79983 -0.24783 10.0833 0.695 0.77792 -0.082922 1

0.1 0.575 0.73563 -0.16063 10.1166 0.638 0.69588 -0.057877 10.1333 1.007 0.65805 0.34895 1

0.15 0.394 0.62228 -0.22828 10.1666 0.568 0.58865 -0.020646 10.1833 0.527 0.55665 -0.029647 1

0.2 0.499 0.52639 -0.027387 10.2166 0.492 0.49794 -0.005939 10.2333 0.47 0.47087 -0.00087072 1

0.25 0.455 0.44527 0.0097261 10.2666 0.442 0.42121 0.020791 10.2833 0.426 0.39831 0.027688 1

0.3 0.413 0.37666 0.03634 10.3166 0.398 0.3563 0.041697 10.3333 0.385 0.33693 0.048065 10.4166 0.325 0.25496 0.070045 1

0.5 0.274 0.19286 0.081142 10.5833 0.227 0.14593 0.081066 10.6686 0.186 0.11043 0.075573 1

0.75 0.148 0.083531 0.064469 . 10.8333 0.113 0.063207 0.049793 10.9166 0.082 0.047828 0.034172 1

1 0.056 0.036179 0.019821 11.0833 0.031 0.027376 0.0036237 11.1666 0.009 0.020715 -0.011715 1

RESULTS FROM VISUAL CURVE MATCHING

VISUAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

EstimateK - 3.3256E-003yO - 1.0281E+000

Page 90: Documentin

A Q T E S O L V R E S U L T SVersion 1.10

10/23/91 15:39:43

TEST DESCRIPTION

Data set........... JCF202.DATData set title..... FALLING HEAD TEST OF MW-202

Knowns and Constants:No. of data points.................. 34Radius of well casing............... 0.083Radius of well....................... 0.29Aquifer saturated thickness......... 8.7Well screen length.................. 10Static height of water in well...... 8.7Log(Re/Rw).......................... 2.599A, B, C............................. 0.000, 0.000, 2.113

ANALYTICAL METHOD

Bouwer and Rice (unconfined aquifer slug test)

RESULTS FROM STATISTICAL CURVE MATCHING

STATISTICAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

Estimate Std. ErrorK - 2.6311E-002 +/' 4.4379E-003yO - 1.6763E+000 +/- 2.1822E-001

ANALYSIS OF MODEL RESIDUALS

residual - calculated - observedweighted residual - residual * weight

Weighted Residual Statistics:Number of residuals............... 34Number of estimated parameters.... 2Degrees of freedom................ 32Residual mean..................... 0.03456Residual standard deviation....... 0.1646Residual variance................. 0.02709

Model Residuals:

Time Observed Calculated Residual Weight

Page 91: Documentin

0.0083 1.784 1.3135 0.47053 10.0166 0.352 1.0292 -0.67719 10.025 0.864 0.80407 0.059929 10.0333 0.564 0.63004 -0.066043 10.0416 0.406 0.49368 -0.08768 10.05 0.46 0.3857 0.074304 1

0.0583- 0.324 0.30222 0.021782 10.0666 0.4 0.23681 0.16319 10.075 0.343 0.18501 0.15799 10.0833 0.106 0.14497 -0.038967 1

0.1 0.128 0.088745 0.039255 10.1166 0.223 0.054487 0.16851 10.1333 0.122 0.033356 0.088644 10.15 0.081 0.020419 0.060581 1

0.1666 0.049 0.012537 0.036463 10.1833 0.065 0.0076749 0.057325 1

0.2 0.027 0.0046983 0.022302 10.2166 0.049 0.0028847 0.046115 10.2333 0.087 0.0017659 0.085234 1

0.25 0.223 0.001081 0.22192 10.2666 0.027 0.00066374 0.026336 1

0.3 0.033 0.00024874 0.032751 10.3166 0.036 0.00015272 0.035847 10.3333 0.036 9.3491E-005 0.035907 10.4166 0.03 8.0853E-006 0.029992 1

0.5 0.024 6.9718E-007 0.023999 10.5833 0.021 6.0294E-008 0.021 10.66 6 0.014 5.2143E-009 0.014 1

0.75 0.014 4.4962E-010 0.014 10.8333 0.011 3.8884E-011 0.011 10.9166 0.008 3.3628E-012 0.008 1

1 0.008 2.8997E-013 0.008 11.0833 0.005 2.5077E-014 0.005 11.1666 0.005 2.1687E-015 0.005 1

RESULTS FROM VISUAL CURVE MATCHING

VISUAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

EstimateK - 7.6137E-003yO - 5.0119E-001

flR3008l*9

Page 92: Documentin

= A Q^T E S O L V R E S U L T SVersion 1.10

10/24/91 09:21:37

TEST DESCRIPTION

Data set........... JCF204.DATData set title..... FALLING HEAD SLUG TEST OF MW-204

Knowns and Cons tants:No. of data points.................. 64Radius of well casing............... 0.083Radius of well...................... 0.29Aquifer saturated thickness......... 9.8Well screen length.................. 15Static height of water in well...... 8.8Log(Re/Rw)................;......... 2.533A, B, C............................. 3.127, 0.502, 0.000

ANALYTICAL METHOD

Bouwer and Rice (unconfined aquifer slug test)

RESULTS FROM STATISTICAL CURVE MATCHING

STATISTICAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

Estimate Std. ErrorK - 4.7430E-004 +/- 8.6737E-005yO - 3.7346E-001 +/- 2.3484E-002

ANALYSIS OF MODEL RESIDUALS

residual - calculated - observedweighted residual - residual * weight

Weighted Residual Statistics:Number of residuals............... 64Number of estimated parameters.... 2Degrees of freedom................ 62Residual mean..................... 0.01114Residual standard deviation....... 0.09173Residual variance................. 0.008414

Model Residuals:

Time Observed Calculated Residual Weight

AR300850

Page 93: Documentin

0.0083 0.284 0.37094 -0.086944 10.0166 0.748 0.36844 0.37956 10.025 0.199 0.36593 -0.16693 10.0333 0.571 0.36346 0.20754 10.0416 0.36 0.36101 -0.0010064 10.05 0.439 0.35854 0.080458 l

0.0583 0.398 0.35612 0.041877 10.0666 0.549 0.35372 0.19528 10.075 0.6 0.35131 0.24869 10.0833 0.3 0.34894 -0.048937 1

0.1 0.53 0.34422 0.18578 10.1166 0.195 0.33959 -0.14459 10.1333 0.246 0.335 -0.088995 10.15 0.268 0.33046 -0.062464 1

0.1666 0.249 0.32602 -0.077021 10.1833 0.243 0.32161 -0.078611 1

0.2 0.24 0.31726 -0.077261 10.2166 0.236 0.313 -0.076995 10.2333 0.23 0.30876 -0.078762 10.25 0.227 0.30459 -0.077585 1

0.2666 0.224 0.30049 -0.07649 10.2833 0.221 0.29643 -0.075425 1

0.3 0.218 0.29242 -0.074416 10.3166 0.214 0.28848 -0.074484 10.3333 0.214 0.28458 -0.070582 10.4166 0.205 0.26589 -0.060893 1

0.5 0.195 0.24841 -0.053411 10.583-3 0.189 0.2321 -0.043097 10.6666 0.183 0.21685 -0.033854 10.75 0.176 0.2026 -0.026596 1

0.8333 0.173 0.18929 -0.016291 10.9166 0.167 0.17686 -0.0098597 1

1 0.161 0.16523 -0.0042313 11.0833 0.157 0.15438 0.0026199 11.1666 0.154 0.14424 0.0097586 11.25 0.148 0.13476 0.013242 1

1.3333 0.148 0.12591 0.022092 11.4166 0.145 0.11764 0.027361 1

1.5 0.142 0.1099 0.032096 11.5833 0.139 0.10269 0.036313 11.6666 0.135 0.095943 0.039057 11.75 0.132 0.089635 0.042365 1

1.8333 0.129 0.083748 0.045252 11.9166 0.126 0.078248 0.047752 1

2 0.123 0.073103 0.049897 12.5 0.11 0.048625 0.061375 13 0.097 0.032343 0.064657 1

3.5 0.085 0.021513 0.063487 14 0.075 0.01431 0.06069 1

4.5 0.066 0.0095181 0.056482 15 0.06 0.006331 0.053669 1

5.5 0.056 0.0042111 0.051789 16 0.044 0.002801 0.041199 1

6.5 0.041 0.0018631 0.039137 17 0.037 0.0012393 0.035761 1

7.5 0.034 0.00082429 0.033176 18 0.031 0.00054828 0.030452 1

8.5 0.025 0.00036469 0.024635 19 0.022 0.00024258 0.021757 1

AR30085I

Page 94: Documentin

9.5 0.018 0.00016135 0.017839 110 ' 0.015 0.00010732 0.014893 112 0.009 2.1008E-005 0.008979 114 0.009 4.1122E-006 0.0089959 116 0.003 8.0494E-007 0.0029992 1

RESULTS FROM VISUAL CURVE MATCHING

VISUAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

EstimateK - 4.7430E-004yO - 3.7346E-001

AR300852

Page 95: Documentin

A Q T E S O L V R E S U L T SVersion 1.10

10/24/91 09:29:32

TEST DESCRIPTION

Data set........... JCF205.DATData set title..... FALLING HEAD SLUG TEST OF MW-205

Knowns and Constants:No. of data points.................. 62Radius of well casing............... 0.083Radius of well...................... 0.29Aquifer saturated thickness......... 17.2Well screen length.................. 10Static height of water in well...... 16.7Log(Re/Rw).......................... 2.833A, B, C............................. 2.585, 0.421, 0.000

, ANALYTICAL METHOD

Bouwer and Rice (unconfined aquifer slug test)

RESULTS FROM STATISTICAL CURVE MATCHING

STATISTICAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

Estimate Std. ErrorK - 1.4390E-002 +/- 1.6925E-003yO - 1.0865E+000 +/- 9.0367E-002

ANALYSIS OF MODEL RESIDUALS

residual - calculated - observedweighted residual - residual * weight

Weighted Residual Statistics:Number of residuals............... 62Number of estimated parameters.... 2Degrees of freedom................ 60Residual mean..................... 0.04949Residual standard deviation....... 0.07988Residual variance................. 0.00638

Model Residuals:

Time Observed Calculated Residual Weight

AR300853

Page 96: Documentin

0.0166 1.018 0.85062 0.16738 10.025 0.746 0.75152 -0.0055163 10.0333 0.572 0.66494 -0.092941 10.0416 0.5 0.58834 -0.088339 10.05 0.43 0.5198 -0.089795 1

0.0666 0.348 0.40693 -0.058932 10.075 0.594 0.35952 0.23448 10.0833 0.285 0.31811 -0.033105 1

0.1 0.082 0.24867 --0.16667 10.1333 0.092 0.15218 -0.06018 10.15 0.032 0.11896 -0.086962 1

0.1666 0.152 0.093132 0.058868 10.1833 0.155 0.072802 0.082198 1

0.2 0.146 0.056911 0.089089 10.2166 0.136 0.044554 0.091446 10.2333 0.13 0.034828 0.095172 10.25 0.124 0.027226 0.096774 1

0.2666 0.117 0.021314 0.095686 10.2833 0.114 0.016662 0.097338 1

0.3 0.108 0.013025 0.094975 10.3166 0.105 0.010197 0.094803 10.3333 0.101 0.0079709 0.093029 10.4166 0.089 0.0023336 0.086666 1

0.5 0.082 0.00068221 0.081318 10..5833 0.076 0.00019973 0.0758 10.6666 0.07 5.8475E-005 0.069942 10.75 0.067 1.7095E-005 0.066983 1

O.SSS'S 0.064 5.0048E-006 0.063995 10.9166 0.064 1.4652E-006 0.063999 1

1 0.06 4.2835E-007 0.06 11.0833 0.06 1.2541E-007 0.06 11.1666 0.06 3.6715E-008 0.06 11.25 0.06 1.0733E-008 0.06 1

1.3333 0.06 3.1424E-009 0.06 11.4166 0.06 9.2E-010 0.06 1

1.5 0.057 2.6895E-010 0.057 11.5833 0.057 7.8741E-011 0.057 11.6666 0.057 2.3053E-011 0.057 11.75 0.057 6.7392E-012 0.057 1

1.8333 0.057 1.973E-012 0.057 11.9166 0.054 5.7765E-013 0.054 1

2 0.054 1.6887E-013 0.054 12.5 0.051 1.0603E-016 0.051 13 0.057 6.6573E-020 0.057 1

3.5 0.054 4.18E-023 0.054 14 0.054 2.6245E-026 0.054 1

4.5 0.054 1.6479E-029 0.054 15 0.051 1.0347E-032 0.051 1

5.5 0.051 6.4965E-036 0.051 16 0.054 4.079E-039 0.054 1

6.5 0.054 2.5611E-042 0.054 17 0.057 1.6081E-045 0.057 1

7.5 0.057 1.0097E-048 0.057 18 0.051 6.3396E-052 0.051 1

8.5 0.054 3.9805E-055 0.054 19 0.057 2.4993E-058 0.057 1

9.5 0.057 1.5692E-061 0.057 110 0.057 9.8529E-065 0.057 112 0.06 1.5313E-077 0.06 1

AR300851*

Page 97: Documentin

14 0.054 2.38E-090 0.054 116 0.057 3.6989E-103 0.057 118 0.057 5.7488E-116 0.057 1

RESULTS FROM VISUAL CURVE MATCHING

VISUAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

EstimateK - 1.4390E-002yO - 1.0865E+000

AR300855

Page 98: Documentin

A Q T E S O L V R E S U L T SVersion 1.10

10/24/91 10:07:39

TEST DESCRIPTION

Data set........... JCF206.DATData set title..... FALLING HEAD SLUG TEST OF MW-206

Knowns and Cons tants:No. of data points.................. 33Radius of well casing............... 0.083Radius of well...................... 0.29Aquifer saturated thickness......... 4.7Well screen length.................. 10Static height of water in well...... 4.7Log(Re/Rw).......................... 2.192A, B, C............................. 0.000, 0.000, 2.113

ANALYTICAL METHOD

Bouwer and Rice (unconfined aquifer slug test)

RESULTS FROM STATISTICAL CURVE MATCHING

STATISTICAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

Estimate Std. ErrorK - 7.8555E-003 +/- 5.4979E-004yO - 7.8108E-001 +/- 4.1568E-002

ANALYSIS OF MODEL RESIDUALS

residual - calculated - observedweighted residual - residual * weight

Weighted Residual Statistics:Number of residuals............... 33Number of estimated parameters.... 2Degrees of freedom................ 31Residual mean..................... 0.007912Residual standard deviation....... 0.03326Residual variance................. 0.001106

Model Residuals:

Time Observed Calculated Residual Weight

AR300856

Page 99: Documentin

0.0333 0.666 0.55238 0.11362 10.0416 0.53 0.50668 0.023322 1

0.05 0.419 0.46428 -0.045277 10.0583 0.397 0.42587 -0.028867 10.0666 0.321 0.39064 -0.069635 10.075 0.331 0.35795 -0.026946 10.0833 0.268 0.32833 -0.060333 1

0.1 0.268 0.27597 -0.007967 10.1333 0.208 0.19516 0.012838 10.1666 0.198 0.13802 0.059983 10.1833 0.116 0.116 -4.3901E-006 1

0.2 0.103 0.097503 0.0054972 10.2166 0.091 0.082037 0.0089626 10.2333 0.081 0.068953 0.012047 1

0.25 0.072 0.057956 0.014044 10.2666 0.065 0.048763 0.016237 10.2833 0.059 0.040986 0.018014 1

0.3 0.056 0.034449 0.021551 10.3166 0.05 0.028985 0.021015 10.3333 0.05 0.024362 0,025638 10.4166 0.034 0.010241 0.023759 1

0.5 0.027 0.0043003 0.0227 10.5833 0.021 0.0018077 0.019192 10.6666 0.018 0.00075986 0.01724 1

0.75 0.015 0.00031908 0.014681 10.8333 0.012 0.00013413 0.011866 10.9166 0.008 5.6381E-005 0.0079436 1

' 1 0.005 2.3675E-005 0.0049763 11.0833 0.005 9.9521E-006 0.00499 11.1666 0.005 4.1834E-006 0.0049958 1

1.25 0.005 1.7567E-006 0.0049982 11.3333 0.005 7.3844E-007 0.0049993 11.4166 0.005 3.1041E-007 0.0049997 1

RESULTS FROM VISUAL CURVE MATCHING

VISUAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

EstimateK - 7.8555E-003yO - 7.8108E-001

AR300857

Page 100: Documentin

A Q T E S O L V R E S U L T SVersion 1.10

10/23/91 13:17:58

TEST DESCRIPTION

Data set........... JCF207.DATData set title..... FALLING HEAD SLUG TEST OF MW-207

Knowns and Constants:No. of data points.................. 45Radius of well casing............... 0.083Radius of well...................... 0.29Aquifer saturated thickness......... 18.8Well screen length.................. 10Static height of water in well...... 18.3Log(Re/Rw).......................... 2.882A, B, C............................. 2.585, 0.421, 0.000

ANALYTICAL METHOD

Bouwer and Rice (unconfined aquifer slug test)

RESULTS FROM STATISTICAL CURVE MATCHING

STATISTICAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

Estimate Std. ErrorK - 2.0093E-002 +/- 2.0088E-003yO - 1.5593E+000 +/- 1.2931E-001

ANALYSIS OF MODEL-RESIDUALS

residual - calculated - observedweighted residual - residual * weight

Weighted Residual Statistics:Number of residuals............... 45Number of estimated parameters.... 2Degrees of freedom................ 43Residual mean..................... 0.02667Residual standard deviation....... 0.08741Residual variance................. 0.007641

Model Residuals:

Time ' Observed Calculated Residual Weight

flR300858

Page 101: Documentin

0.0166 1.301 1.1143 0.1867 10.025 0.793 0.94007 -0.14707 10.0333 0.906 0.79469 0.11131 10.0416 0.736 0.6718 0.064203 1

0.05 0.236 0.56676 -0.33076 10.0583 0.278 0.47911 -0.20111 10.0666 0.385 0.40502 -0.020019 10.075 0.394 0.34169 0.052308 10.0833 0.347 0.28885 0.058149 1

0.1 0.262 0.206 0.055998 10.1166 0.227 0.14721 0.079786 10.1333 0.195 0.10499 0.09001 10.15 0.17 0.074876 0.095124 1

0.1666 0.148 0.053508 0.094492 10.1833 0.132 0.038161 0.093839 1

0.2 0.12 0.027216 0.092784 10.2166 0.107 0.019449 0.087551 10.2333 0.094 0.013871 0.080129 1

0.25 0.088 0.0098922 0.078108 10.2666 0.078 0.0070692 0.070931 10.2833 0.072 0.0050416 0.066958 1

0.3 0.069 0.0035956 0.065404 10.3166 0.063 0.0025695 0.060431 10.3333 0.06 0.0018325 0.058168 10.4166 0.041 0.00033946 0.040661 1

0.5 0.031 6.2757E-005 0.030937 10.5833 0.025 1.1625E-005 0.024988 10.6666 0.022 2.1536E-006 0.021998 1

0.75 0.018 3.9813E-007 0.018 10.8333 0.015 7.3753E-008 0.015 10.9166 0.015 1.3662E-008 0.015 1

1 0.012 2.5258E-009 0.012 11.0833 0.012 4.6789E-010 0.012 11.1666 0.009 8.6675E-011 0.009 1

1.25 0.009 1.6024E-011 0.009 11.3333 0.006 2.9683E-012 0.006 11.4166 0.006 5.4988E-013 0.006 1

1.5 0.006 1.0166E-013 0.006 11.5833 0.006 1.8831E-014 0.006 11.6666 0.003 3.4885E-015 0.003 1

1.75 0.006 6.4492E-016 0.006 11.8333 0.006 1.1947E-016 0.006 11.9166 0.003 2.2131E-017 0.003 1

2 0.003 4.0914E-018 0.003 12.5 0.003 1.6467E-022 0.003 1

RESULTS FROM VISUAL CURVE MATCHING

VISUAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

EstimateK - 2.0093E-002yO - 1.5593E+000

AR300859

Page 102: Documentin

A Q T E S O L V R E S U L T SVersion 1.10

10/24/91 10:31:58

TEST DESCRIPTION

Data set........... JCF209.DATData set title..... FALLING HEAD SLUG TEST OF MW-209

Knowns and Constants:No. of data points.................. 45Radius of well casing............... 0.083Radius of well...................... 0.29Aquifer saturated thickness......... 10Well screen length.................. 10Static height of water in well...... 10Log(Re/Rw).......................... 2.688A. B, C............................. 0.000, 0.000, 2.113

ANALYTICAL METHODirBouwer and Rice (unconfined aquifer slug test)

RESULTS FROM STATISTICAL CURVE MATCHING

STATISTICAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

Estimate Std. ErrorK - 8.0412E-003 +/' 1.1824E-003yO - 7.3562E-001 +/- 6.3170E-002

ANALYSIS OF MODEL RESIDUALS

residual - calculated - observedweighted residual - residual * weight

Weighted Residual Statistics:Number of residuals............... 45Number of estimated parameters.... 2Degrees of freedom................ 43Residual mean..................... 0.01899Residual standard deviation....... 0.1009Residual variance................. 0.01018

Model Residuals:

Time Observed Calculated Residual Weight

AR300860

Page 103: Documentin

0.0083 1.224 0.68447 0.53953 10.0166 0.479 0.63687 -0.15787 10.025 0.441 0.59207 -0.15107 10.0333 0.431 0.5509 -0.1199 10.0416 0.453 0.51259 -0.059587 10.05 0.425 0.47653 -0.051528 1

0.0583 0.384 0.44339 -0.059391 10.0666 0.346 0.41256 -0.066558 10.075 0.315 0.38354 -0.068535 10.0833 0.302 0.35686 -0.054865 1

0.1 0.277 0.30869 -0.03169 10.1166 0.249 0.26725 -0.01825 10.1333 0.23 0.23117 -0.001173 1

0.15 0.211 0.19997 0.011034 10.1666 0.195 0.17312 0.021878 10.1833 0.186 0.14975 0.036249 1

0.2 0.177 0.12954 0.047464 10.2166 0.164 0.11215 0.051853 10.2333 0.155 0.097007 0.057993 1

0.25 0.148 0.083912 0.064088 10.2666 0.139 0.072647 0.066353 10.2833 0.133 • 0.06284 0.07016 1

0.3 0.126 0.054357 0.071643 10.3166 0.12 0.04706 0.07294 10.3333 0.114 0.040707 0.073293 10.4166 0.092 0.019748 0.072252 1

0.5 0.076 0.0095718 0.066428 10.583/3 0.063 0.0046435 0.058357 10.6666 0.051 0.0022526 0.048747 1

0.75 0.045 0.0010918 0.043908 10.8333 0.035 0.00052968 0.03447 10.9166 0.032 0.00025696 0.031743 1

1 0.026 0.00012455 0.025875 11.0833 0.022 6.042E-005 0.02194 11.1666 0.019 2.9311E-005 0.018971 11.25 0.016 1.4207E-005 0.015986 1

1.3333 0.013 6.892E-006 0.012993 11.4166 0.013 3.3435E-006 0.012997 1

1.5 0.01 1.6206E-006 0.0099984 11.5833 0.01 7.8617E-007 0.0099992 11.6666 0.007 3.8139E-007 0.0069996 11.75 0.007 1.8486E-007 0.0069998 1

1.8333 0.004 8.9678E-008 0.0039999 11.9166 0.004 4.3505E-008 0.004 1

2 0.004 2.1087E-008 0.004 1

RESULTS FROM VISUAL CURVE MATCHING

VISUAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

Estimate.K - 8.0412E-003yO - 7.3562E-001

AR30086I

Page 104: Documentin

A Q T E S O L V R E S U L T SVersion 1.10

10/23/91 13:58:23

TEST DESCRIPTION

Data set........... JCF210.DATData set title..... FALLING HEAD SLUG TEST OF MW-210

Knowns and Constants:No. of data points.................. 42Radius of well casing............... 0.083Radius of well...................... 0.29Aquifer saturated thickness......... 8.2Well screen length.................. 10Static height of water in well...... 8.2Log(Re/Rw).......................... 2.561A, B, C............................. 0.000, 0.000, 2.113

ANALYTICAL METHOD

Bouwer and Rice (unconfined aquifer slug test)

RESULTS FROM STATISTICAL CURVE MATCHING

STATISTICAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

Estimate Std. ErrorK - 1.9742E-003 +/- 2.3408E-004yO - 1.2495E+000 +/- 6.8467E-002

ANALYSIS OF MODEL RESIDUALS

residual - calculated - observedweighted residual - residual * weight

Weighted Residual Statistics:Number of residuals............... 42Number of estimated parameters.... 2Degrees of freedom................ 40Residual mean..................... 0.01979Residual standard deviation....... 0.1475Residual variance................. 0.02175

Model Residuals:

Time Observed Calculated Residual Weight

AR300862

Page 105: Documentin

0.0416 1.766 , 1.1384 0.62756 10.05 1.526 1.1172 0.40876 1

0.0583 0.932 1.0967 -0.16468 10.0666 0.774 1.0765 -0.3025 10.075 1.178 1.0565 0.12155 10.0833 0.894 1.037 -0.14301 1

0.1 0.916 0.99898 -0.082976 10.1166 0.884 0.96255 -0.078548 10.1333 0.846 0.92724 -0.081242 1

0.15 0.812 0.89323 -0.081231 10.1666 0.78 0.86066 -0.08066 10.1833 0.752 0.82909 -0.077091 1

0.2 0.723 0.79868 -0.07568 10.2166 0.698 0.76956 -0.071556 10.2333 0.676 0.74133 -0.065329 1

0.25 0.654 0.71414 -0.060137 10.2666 0.635 0.6881 -0.053096 10.2833 0.613 0.66286 -0.049857 1

0.3 0.597 0.63854 -0.041543 10.3166 0.578 0.61526 -0.037259 10.3333 0.562 0.59269 -0.030691 10.4166 0.489 0.4919 -0.0028989 1

0.5 0.429 0.40816 0.020844 10.5833 0.382 0.33875 0.043255 10.6666 0.341 0.28114 0.059862 1

0.75 0.303 0.23328 0.069724 10.8333 0.271 0.19361 0.077395 10.9166 0.246 0.16068 0.085319 1

1 0.221 0.13333 0.087674 11.0833 0.195 0.11065 0.084347 11.1666 0.176 0.091835 0.084165 1

1.25 0.157 0.076201 0.080799 11.3333 0.142 0.063242 0.078758 11.4166 0.129 0.052487 0.076513 1

1.5 0.116 0.043552 0.072448 11.5833 0.107 0.036145 0.070855 ' 11.6666 0.094 0.029998 0.064002 1

1.75 0.082 0.024891 0.057109 11.8333 0.072 0.020658 0.051342 11.9166 0.063 0.017145 0.045855 1

2 0.053 0.014226 0.038774 12.5 0.009 0.0046471 0.0043529 1

RESULTS FROM VISUAL CURVE MATCHING

VISUAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

EstimateK - 1.9742E-003yO - 1.2495E+000

AR300863

Page 106: Documentin

A Q T E S O L V R E S U L T SVersion 1.10

10/23/91 13:41:12

TEST DESCRIPTION

Data set........... JCF211.DATData set title..... FALLING HEAD SLUG TEST OF MW-211

Knowns and Constants:No. of data points.................. 61Radius of well casing............... 0.083Radius of well...................... 0.29Aquifer saturated thickness......... 13Well screen length.................. 10Static height of water in well...... 13Log(Re/Rw).......................... 2.853A, B, C............................. 0.000, 0.000, 2.113

ANALYTICAL METHOD

Bouwer and Rice (unconfined aquifer slug test)

RESULTS FROM STATISTICAL CURVE MATCHING

STATISTICAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

Estimate Std. ErrorK - 9.0070E-004 +/- 7.2126E-005yO - 1.1257E+000 +/- 3.3909E-002

ANALYSIS OF MODEL RESIDUALS

residual - calculated - observedweighted residual - residual * weight

Weighted Residual Statistics:Number of residuals............... 61Number of estimated parameters.... 2Degrees of freedom,............... 59Residual mean..................... 0.01834Residual standard deviation....... 0.1157Residual variance................. 0.01338

Model Residuals:

Time Observed Calculated Residual Weight

AR30086L*

Page 107: Documentin

0.0333 1.513 1.0918 0.42118 10.0416 1.352 1.0835 0.26845 10.05 0.793 1.0752 -0.28223 1

0.0583 1.45 1.0671 0.38291 10.0666 0.856 1.059 -0.203 10.075 1.105 1.0509 0.054125 10.0833 1.219 1.0429 0.17609 1

0.1 1.055 1.0271 0.027933 10.1166 0.831 1.0116 -0.18056 10.1333 1.14 0.99619 0.14381 10.15 0.947 0.98106 -0.034057 1

0.1666 0.846 0.96624 -0.12024 10.1833 0.887 0.95156 -0.064564 1

0.2 0.887 0.93711 -0.050108 10.2166 0.862 0.92296 -0.060957 10.2333 0.837 0.90894 -0.071936 10.25 0.821 0.89513 -0.074128 1

0.2666 0.805 0.88161 -0.076611 10.2833 0.789 0.86822 -0.079218 1

0.3 0.777 0.85503 -0.078029 10.3166 0.761 0.84212 -0.081117 10.3333 0.748 0.82932 -0.081324 10.4166 0.692 0.76836 -0.076358 1

0.5 0.641 0.71181 -0.070808 10.5833 0.597 0.65948 -0.06248 10.6666 0.559 0.611 -0.052 10.75 0.524 0.56603 -0.042031 1

0.83-33 0.492 0.52442 -0.03242 10.9166 0.464 0.48587 -0.021868 1

1 0.439 0.45011 -0.011109 11.0833 0.417 0.41702 -1.9908E-005 11.1666 0.398 0.38636 0.011637 11.25 0.379 0.35793 0.021072 1

1.3333 0.363 0.33162 0.031385 11.4166 0.347 0.30724 0.039763 1

1.5 0.331 0.28462 0.046375 11.5833 0.312 0.2637 0.048299 11.6666 0.3 0.24432 0.055685 11.75 0.287 0.22633 0.060666 1

1.8333 0.274 0.2097 0.064304 11.9166 0.262 0.19428 0.06772 1

2 0.249 0.17998 0.069019 12.5 0.199 0.11381 0.085189 13 0.157 0.071968 0.085032 1

3.5 0.129 0.045509 0.083491 14 0.11 0.028777 0.081223 1

4.5 0.101 0.018197 0.082803 15 0.088 0.011507 0.076493 1

5.5 0.075 0.0072763 0.067724 16 0.072 0.0046012 0.067399 1

6.5 0.069 0.0029095 0.06609 17 0.06 0.0018398 0.05816 1

7.5 0.053 0.0011634 0.051837 18 0.044 0.00073568 0.043264 1

8.5 0.037 . 0.0004652 0.036535 19 0.037 0.00029417 0.036706 1

9.5 0.034 0.00018602 0.033814 110 0.028 0.00011763 0.027882 112 0.025 1.8807E-005 0.024981 1

AR300865

Page 108: Documentin

14 0.012 3.0071E-006 0.011997 116 0.015 4.808E-007 0.015 1

RESULTS FROM VISUAL CURVE MATCHING

VISUAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

EstimateK - 9.0070E-004yO - 1.1257E+000

AR300866

Page 109: Documentin

A Q T E S O L V R E S U L T SVersion 1.10

10/23/91 14:04:41

TEST DESCRIPTION

Data set........... JCF212.DATData set title..... FALLING HEAD SLUG TEST OF MW-212

Knowns and Constants:No. of data points.................. 41Radius of well casing............... 0.083Radius of well...................... 0.29Aquifer saturated thickness......... 34Well screen length.................. 10Static height of water in well...... 34Log(Re/Rw).......................... 3.423A, B, C............................. 0.000, 0.000, 2.113

> ANALYTICAL METHOD

Bouwer and Rice (unconfined aquifer slug test)

RESULTS FROM STATISTICAL CURVE MATCHING

STATISTICAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

Estimate Std. ErrorK - 6.4735E-003 +/- 1.6759E-004yO - 1.4715E+000 +/- 2.1236E-002

ANALYSIS OF MODEL RESIDUALS

residual - calculated - observedweighted residual - residual * weight

Weighted Residual Statistics:Number of residuals............... 41Number of estimated parameters.... 2Degrees of freedom................ 39Residual mean..................... 0.01661Residual standard deviation....... 0.0373Residual variance................. 0.001391

Model Residuals:

Time Observed Calculated Residual Weight

AR300867

Page 110: Documentin

0.0166 1.254 1.3433 -0.089289 10.025 1.273 1.2827 -0.0097372 10.0333 1.282 1.2256 0.056412 10.0416 1.216 1.171 0.045015 10.05 1.153 1.1182 0.034799 1

0.0583 1.096 1.0684 0.027618 10.0666 1.036 1.0208 0.015217 10.075 0.985 0.97477 0.010231 10.0833 0.935 0.93134 0.0036589 1

0.1 0.843 0.84974 -0.006736 10.1166 0.761 0.77571 -0.014707 10.1333 0.688 0.70774 -0.019739 1

0.15 0.625 0.64573 -0.020726 10.1666 0.565 0.58947 -0.02447 10.1833 0.515 0.53782 -0.02282 1

0.2 0.47 0.4907 -0.020696 10.2166 0.429 0.44795 -0.018946 10.2333 0.394 0.4087 -0.014697 10.25 0.363 0.37289 -0.0098865 1

0.2666 0.331 0.3404 -0.0094006 10.2833 0.306 0.31057 -0.0045744 1

0.3 0.284 0.28336 0.0006385 10.3166 0.262 0.25868 0.0033249 10.3333 0.243 0.23601 0.0069903 10.4166 0.173 0.14938 0.023623 1

0.5 0.132 0.094493 0.037507 10.5833 0.107 0.059807 0.047193 10.666-6 0.088 0.037853 0.050147 1

0.75 0.075 0.023945 0.051055 10.8333 0.069 0.015156 0.053844 10.9166 0.063 0.0095924 0.053408 1

1 0.056 0.0060679 0.049932 11.0833 0.053 0.0038405 0.049159 11.1666 0.05 0.0024308 0.047569 11.25 0.05 0.0015377 0.048462 . 1

1.3333 0.047 0.00097323 0.046027 11.4166 0.044 0.00061598 0.043384 1

1.5 0.044 0.00038966 0.04361 11.5833 0.041 0.00024662 0.040753 11.6666 0.041 0.00015609 0.040844 11.75 0.037 9.8742E-005 0.036901 1

RESULTS FROM VISUAL CURVE MATCHING

VISUAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

EstimateK - 6.4735E-003yO - 1.4715E+000

AR300868

Page 111: Documentin

A Q T E S O L V R E S U L T SVersion 1.10

10/23/91 14:18:40

TEST DESCRIPTION

Data set........... JCF302.DATData set title..... FALLING HEAD SLUG TEST OF MW-302

Knowns and Constants:No. of data points.................. 47Radius of well casing............... 0.166Radius of well...................... 0.333Aquifer saturated thickness......... 79Well screen length.................. 20Static height of water in well...... 79Log(Re/Rw).......................... 3.985A, B, C............................. 0.000, 0.000, 2.991

ANALYTICAL METHOD

Bouwer and Rice (unconfined aquifer slug test)

RESULTS FROM STATISTICAL CURVE MATCHING

STATISTICAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

Estimate Std. ErrorK - 3.8414E-003 +/- 1.5597E-004yO - 1.9659E+000 +/- 4.2014E-002

ANALYSIS OF MODEL RESIDUALS

residual - calculated - observedweighted residual — residual * weight

Weighted Residual Statistics:Number of residuals............... 47Number of estimated parameters.... 2Degrees of freedom................ 45Residual mean..................... 0.01229Residual standard deviation....... 0.07879Residual variance................. 0.006207

Model Residuals:

Time Observed Calculated Residual Weight

AR300869

Page 112: Documentin

0.1166 1.789 1.67 0.11903 10.1333 1.692 1.6314 0.060597 1

0.15 1.651 1.5937 0.057277 10.1666 1.811 1.5571 0.25387 10.1833 1.604 1.5212 0.082833 1

0.2 1.377 1.486 -0.10903 10.2166 1.223 1.4519 -0.22891 10.2333 1.352 1.4184 -0.066379 1

0.25 1.38 1.3856 -0.0056196 10.2666 1.317 1.3538 -0.036806 10.2833 1.336 1.3225 0.013463 1

0.3 1.192 1.292 -0.099991 10.3166 1.166 1.2623 -0.096327 10.3333 1.135 1.2332 -0.098172 10.4166 0.984 1.0975 -0.1135 1

0.5 1.195 0.97661 0.21839 10.5833 0.852 0.86916 -0.017163 10.6666 0.758 0.77354 -0.015537 1

0.75 0.673 0.68833 -0.015335 10.8333 0.6 0.6126 -0.012603 10.9166 0.537 0.5452 -0.0082036 1

1 0.484 0.48515 -0.0011516 11.0833 0.43 0.43177 -0.0017745 11.1666 0.38 0.38427 -0.0042701 1

1.25 0.342 0.34194 5.5738E-005 11.3333 0.314 0.30432 0.0096769 11.4166 0.286 0.27084 0.015159 1

1..5 0.261 0.24101 0.019991 11.5833 0.242 0.21449 0.027507 11.6666 0.223 0.19089 0.032106 1

1.75 0.207 0.16987 0.037132 11.8333 0.191 0.15118 0.039821 11.9166 0.179 0.13455 0.044454 1

2 0.169 0.11973 0.049274 12.5 0.113 0.059476 0.053524 13 0.081 0.029546 0.051454 1

3.5 0.066 0.014678 0.051322 14 0.053 0.0072914 0.045709 1

4.5. 0.037 0.0036222 0.033378 15 0.037 0.0017994 0.035201 1

5.5 0.025 0.00089388 0.024106 16 0.031 0.00044405 0.030556 1

6.5 0.022 0.00022059 0.021779 17 0.022 0.00010958 0.02189 1

7.5 0.022 5.4438E-005 0.021946 18 0.022 2.7043E-005 0.021973 1

8.5 0.015 1.3434E-005 0.014987 1

RESULTS FROM VISUAL CURVE MATCHING

VISUAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

EstimateK - 3.8414E-003yO - 1.9659E+000

AR3Q0870

Page 113: Documentin

A Q T E S O L V R E S U L T SVersion 1.10

10/23/91 14:28:25

TEST DESCRIPTION

Data set........... JCF303.DATData set title..... FALLING HEAD SLUG TEST OF MW-303

Knowns and Constants:No. of data points.................. 44Radius of well casing............... 0.166Radius of well...................... 0.333Aquifer saturated thickness......... 60Well screen length.................. 20Static height of water in well...... 60Log(Re/Rw).......................... 3.823A, B, C............................. 0.000, 0.000, 2.991

ANALYTICAL METHOD

Bouwer and Rice (unconfined aquifer slug test)

RESULTS FROM STATISTICAL CURVE MATCHING

STATISTICAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

Estimate Std. ErrorK - 4.8267E-002 +/- 9.0748E-003yO - 1.7958E+000 +/' 3.0987E-001

ANALYSIS OF MODEL RESIDUALS

residual - calculated - observedweighted residual - residual * weight

Weighted Residual Statistics:Number of residuals............... 44Number of estimated parameters.... 2Degrees of freedom................ 42Residual mean..................... 0.02266Residual standard deviation....... 0.1671Residual variance................. 0.02793

Model Residuals:

Time Observed Calculated Residual Weight

AR30087I

Page 114: Documentin

0.025 1.703 . 1.1357 0.56729 10.0333 0.164 0.97544 -0.81144 10.0416 0.966 0.83779 0.12821 10.05 0.584 0.71824 -0.13424 1

0.0583 0.692 0.61688 0.075115 10.0666 0.695 0.52983 0.16517 10.075 0.35 0.45423 -0.10423 10.0833 0.53 0.39013 0.13987 1

0.1 0.262 0.28726 -0.025261 10.1166 0.246 0.21191 0.034094 10.1333 0.018 0.15603 -0.13803 10.15 0.041 0.11489 -0.07389 1

0.1666 0.186 0.084752 0.10125 10.1833 0.135 0.062405 0.072595 1

0.2 0.123 0.04595 0.07705 10.2166 0.113 0.033897 0.079103 10.2333 0.101 0.024959 0.076041 1

0.25 0.091 0.018378 0.072622 10.2666 0.085 0.013557 0.071443 10.2833 0.078 0.0099823 0.068018 1

0.3 0.072 0.0073502 0.06465 10.3166 0.069 0.0054221 0.063578 10.3333 0.063 0.0039924 0.059008 10.4166 0.047 0.00086732 0.046133 1

0.5 0.037 0.00018807 0.036812 10.5833 0.031 4.0857E-005 0.030959 10.6666 0.028 8.8759E-006 0.027991 10.75 0.025 1.9247E-006 0.024998 1

0.8333 0.022 4.1812E-007 0.022 10.9166 0.018 9.0833E-008 0.018 1

1 0.018 1.9696E-008 0.018 11.0833 0.015 4.2789E-009 0.015 11.1666 0.015 9.2955E-010 0.015 11.25 0.015 2.0157E-010 0.015 1

1.3333 0.012 4.3789E-011 0.012 11.4166 0.012 9.5127E-012 0.012 1

1.5 0.012 2.0628E-012 0.012 11.5833 0.009 4.4812E-013 0.009 11.6666 0.012 9.735E-014 0.012 11.75 0.009 2.111E-014 0.009 1

1.8333 0.009 4.5859E-015 0.009 11.9166 0.009 9.9624E-016 0.009 1

2 0.009 2.1603E-016 0.009 12.5 0.006 2.2624E-020 0.006 1

RESULTS FROM VISUAL CURVE MATCHING

VISUAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

EstimateK - 4.8267E-002yO - 1.7958E+000

AR300872

Page 115: Documentin

A Q T E S O L V R E S U L T SVersion 1.10

10/23/91 14:33:00

TEST DESCRIPTION

Data set........... JCF305.DATData set title..... FALLING HEAD SLUG TEST OF MW-305

Knowns and Constants:No. of data points.................. 21Radius of well casing............... 0.166Radius of well...................... 0.333Aquifer saturated thickness......... 74.3Well screen length.................. 20Static height of water in well...... 74.3Log(Re/Rw).......................... 3.949A, B, C. ............................ 0.000, 0.000, 2.991

ANALYTICAL METHODi

Bouwer and Rice (unconfined aquifer slug test)

RESULTS FROM STATISTICAL CURVE MATCHING

STATISTICAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

Estimate Std. ErrorK - 2.1808E-002 +/' 3.5246E-003yO - 1.5693E+000 +/- 1.9717E-001

ANALYSIS OF MODEL RESIDUALS

residual - calculated - observedweighted residual - residual * weight

Weighted Residual Statistics:Number of residuals............... 21Number of estimated parameters.... 2Degrees of freedom................ 19Residual mean..................... 0.001276Residual standard deviation....... 0.177Residual variance................. 0.03133

Model Residuals:

Time Observed Calculated Residual Weight

AR300873

Page 116: Documentin

0.0416 1.651 1.1243 0.52666 10.05 0.871 1.0511 -0.18012 1

0.0583 0.556 0.98347 -0.42747 10.0666 0.905 0.92016 -0.015163 10.075 0.984 0.86025 0.12375 10.0833 0.541 0.80487 -0.26387 1

0.1 0.71 0.70403 0.0059703 10.1166 0.669 0.61631 0.052686 10.1333 0.585 0.5391 0.045905 10.15 0.515 0.47155 0.043449 1

0.1666 0.459 0.4128 0.0462 10.1833 0.405 0.36108 0.04392 1

0.2 0.355 0.31584 0.039161 10.2166 0.311 0.27649 0.034511 10.2333 0.267 0.24185 0.025153 10.25 0.226 0.21155 0.014454 1

0.2666 0.191 0.18519 0.005811 10.2833 0.157 0.16199 -0.0049863 1

0.3 0.125 0.14169 -0.016691 10.3166 0.094 0.12404 -0.030037 10.3333 0.066 0.1085 -0.042497 1

RESULTS FROM VISUAL CURVE MATCHING

VISUAL MATCH, PARAMETER ESTIMATES

EstimateK - 2.1808E-002yO - 1.5693E+000

AR3Q087L*

Page 117: Documentin

A Q T E S O L V R E S U L T SVersion 1.10

10/28/91 11:09:33

TEST DESCRIPTION

Data set........... JCF309.DATData set title..... FALLING HEAD SLUG TEST OF MW-309

Knowns and Constants:No. of data points.................. 46Radius of well casing,.............. 0.16Radius of well...................... 0.33Aquifer saturated thickness......... 82.3Well screen length.................. 20Static height of water in well...... 82.3Log(Re/Rw).......................... 4.016A, B, C............................. 0.000, 0.000, 3.010

, ANALYTICAL METHODf

Bouwer and Rice (unconfined aquifer slug test)

RESULTS FROM STATISTICAL CURVE MATCHING

STATISTICAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

Estimate Std. ErrorK - 1.1763E-002 +/- 6.5623E-004yO - 2.0981E+000 +/- 5.8306E-002

ANALYSIS OF MODEL RESIDUALS

residual - calculated - observedweighted residual - residual * weight

Weighted Residual Statistics:Number of residuals............... 46Number of estimated parameters.... 2Degrees of freedom................ 44Residual mean..................... 0.02075Residual standard deviation....... 0.1234Residual variance................. 0.01524

Model Residuals:

Time Observed Calculated Residual Weight

AR300875

Page 118: Documentin

0.0083 2.49 2.0199 0.47005 10.0166 2.196 1.9447 0.25134 10.025 1.58 1.8713 -0.29132 10.0333 1.355 1.8016 -0.44657 10.0416 1.873 1.7344 0.13857 10.05 1.592 1.669 -0.077017 1

0.0583 1.592 1.6068 -0.014809 10.0666 1.529 1.5469 -0.017921 10.075 1.488 1.4886 -0.00058297 10.0833 1.409 1.4331 -0.024101 1

0.1 1.286 1.3277 -0.041656 10.1166 1.178 1.2305 -0.052532 10.1333 1.106 1.14 -0.033991 10.15 1.027 1.0561 -0.029113 1

0.1666 0.954 0.97885 -0.024853 10.1833 0.888 0.90683 -0.018831 1

0.2 0.827 0.84011 -0.013108 10.2166 0.771 0.77865 -0.0076502 10.2333 0.72 0.72136 -0.0013584 10.25 0.673 0.66828 0.004718 1

0.2666 0.632 0.61939 0.012606 10.2833 0.594 0.57382 0.02018 1

0.3 0.556 0.5316 0.024401 10.3166 0.524 0.49271 0.031289 10.3333 0.493 0.45646 0.036542 10.4166 0.369 0.31178 0.057225 1

0.5 0.284 0.21285 0.071145 10.5833 0.224 0.14539 0.078613 10.6666 0.18 0.099304 0.080696 10.75 0.148 0.067797 0.080203 1

0.8333 0.123 0.046307 0.076693 10.9166 0.107 0.031629 0.075371 1

1 0.091 0.021594 0.069406 11.0833 0.079 0.014749 0.064251 11.1666 0.069 0.010074 0.058926 11.25 0.063 0.0068779 0.056122 1

1.3333 0.053 0.0046978 0.048302 11.4166 0.047 0.0032088 0.043791 1

1.5 0.041 0.0021907 0.038809 11.5833 0.034 0.0014963 0.032504 11.6666 0.031 0.001022 0.029978 11.75 0.028 0.00069776 0.027302 1

1.8333 0.025 0.00047659 0.024523 11.9166 0.022 0.00032553 0.021674 1

2 0.019 0.00022224 0.018778 12.5 0.006 2.2546E-005 0.0059775 1

RESULTS FROM VISUAL CURVE MATCHING

VISUAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

EstimateK -- 1.1763E-002yO - 2.0981E+000

AR300876

Page 119: Documentin

A Q T E S O L V R E S U L T SVersion 1.10

10/23/91 12:56:00

, TEST DESCRIPTION

Data set........... JCR200S.DATData set title..... RISING HEAD SLUG TEST OF MW-200S

Knowns and Constants:No. of data points.................. 62Radius of well casing............... 0.083Radius of well...................... 0.29Aquifer saturated thickness......... 13.69Well screen length.................. 10Static height of water in well...... 13.69Log(Re/Rw).......................... 2.885A, B, C............................. 0.000, 0.000, 2.113

ANALYTICAL METHOD

Bouwer and Rice (unconfined aquifer slug test)

RESULTS FROM STATISTICAL CURVE MATCHING

STATISTICAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

Estimate Std. ErrorK - 5.4199E-004 +/- 6.1272E-005yO - 1.2019E+000 +/' 4.5184E-002

ANALYSIS OF MODEL RESIDUALS

residual - calculated - observedweighted residual - residual * weight

Weighted Residual Statistics:Number of residuals............... 62Number of estimated parameters.... 2Degrees of freedom................ 60Residual mean..................... 0.06796Residual standard deviation....... 0.1769Residual variance................. 0.0313

Model 'Residuals:

Time Observed Calculated Residual Weight

AR300877

Page 120: Documentin

0.0333 1.728 1.1802 0.54777 10.0416 1.172 1.1749 -0.0029023 1

0.05 1.431 1.1695 0.26147 10.0583 1.232 1.1642 0.067752 10.0666 1.295 1.159 0.13601 10.075 1.226 1.1537 0.072309 10.0833 1.222 1.1485 0.073521 1

0.1 1.175 1.1381 0.036935 10.1166 1.156 1.1278 0.028194 10.1333 1.124 1.1176 0.0064206 1

0.15 1.099 1.1074 -0.0084452 10.1666 1.08 1.0975 -0.017463 10.1833 1.058 1.0875 -0.029511 1

0.2 1.039 1.0776 -0.038649 10.2166 1.02 1.0679 -0.047935 10.2333 1.004 1.0583 -0.054251 1

0.25 0.989 1.0487 -0.059655 10.2666 0.973 1.0392 -0.066202 10.2833 0.957 1.0298 -0.072779 1

0.3 0.941 1.0204 -0.079441 10.3166 0.928 1.0112 -0.083243 10.3333 0.916 1.0021 -0.086073 10.4166 0.859 0.95756 -0.098559 1

0.5 0.808 0.91497 -0.10697 10.5833 0.764 0.87433 -0.11033 10.6666 0.723 0.83549 -0.11249 1

0.75 0.692 0.79833 -0.10633 10.8333 0.66 0.76287 -0.10287 10.9166 0.631 0.72898 -0.097984 1

1 0.603 0.69656 -0.093563 11.0833 0.581 0.66562 -0.084621 11.1666 0.559 0.63605 -0.077054 1

1.25 0.54 0.60777 -0.067766 11.3333 0.521 0.58077 -0.059769 11.4166 0.502 0.55497 -0.05297 1

1.5 0.486 0.53029 -0.044289 " 11.5833 0.47 0.50673 -0.036733 11.6666 0.455 0.48422 -0.029223 1

1.75 0.442 0.46269 -0.020688 11.8333 0.429 0.44214 -0.013135 11.9166 0.42 0.4225 -0.0024952 1

2 0.41 0.40371 0.0062945 12.5 0.366 0.30734 0.058662 1

3 0.338 0.23397 0.10403 13.5 0.325 0.17812 0.14688 14 0.315 0.1356 0.1794 1

4.5 0.312 0.10323 0.20877 15 0.315 0.078592 0.23641 1

5.5 0.315 0.059831 0.25517 16 0.309 0,045549 0.26345 1

6.5 0.306 0.034676 0.27132 17 0.309 0.026399 0.2826 1

7.5 0.312 0.020097 0.2919 18 0.309 0.0153 0.2937 1

8.5 0.309 0.011648 0.29735 19 0.309 0.0088673 0.30013 1

9.5 0.309 0.0067506 0.30225 110 0.3 0.0051392 0.29486 112 0.29 0.0017263 0.28827 1

AR300878

Page 121: Documentin

14 0.29 0.00057985 0.28942 116 0.287 0.00019477 0.28681 118 0.29 6.5423E-005 0.28993 1

RESULTS FROM VISUAL CURVE MATCHING

VISUAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

EstimateK - 5.4199E-004yO - 1.2019E+000

Page 122: Documentin

A Q T E S O L V R E S U L T SVersion 1.10

10/23/91 13:05:37

TEST DESCRIPTION

Data set........... JCR201.DATData set title..... RISING HEAD SLUG TEST OF MW-201

Knowns and Constants:No. of data points.................. 26Radius of well casing............... 0.083Radius of well........ ... ...... ..... 0.541Aquifer saturated thickness......... 56Well screen length.................. 20Static height of water in well...... 56Log(Re/Rw).......................... 3.373A, B, C............................. 0.000, 0.000, 2.195

ANALYTICAL METHODi

Bouwer and Rice (unconfined aquifer slug test)

RESULTS FROM STATISTICAL CURVE MATCHING

STATISTICAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

Estimate Std. ErrorK - 1.7944E-002 +/- 5.9383E-004yO - 1.8156E+000 +•/- 4.6917E-002

ANALYSIS OF MODEL RESIDUALS

residual - calculated - observedweighted residual - residual * weight

Weighted Residual Statistics:Number of residuals............... 26Number of estimated parameters.... 2Degrees of freedom................ 24Residual mean..................... 0.01631Residual standard deviation....... 0.03412Residual variance................. 0.001164

Model Residuals:

Time Observed Calculated Residual Weight

AR300880

Page 123: Documentin

0.0083 1.377 1.405 -0.027973 10.0166 1.138 1.0872 0.050762 10.025 0.864 0.83876 0.025235 10.0333 0.644 0.64908 -0.0050781 10.0416 0.474 0.50229 -0.028289 10.05 0.352 0.3875 -0.035498 1

0.0583 0.261 0.29987 -0.038865 10.0666 0.217 0.23205 -0.015051 10.075 0.169 0.17902 -0.010019 10.0833 0.15 0.13853 0.011466 1

0.1 0.122 0.082704 0.039296 10.1166 0.103 0.049527 0.053473 10.1333 0.084 0.029567 0.054433 10.15 0.072 0.017652 0.054348 1

0.1666 0.059 0.010571 0.048429 10.1833 0.05 0.0063106 0.043689 1

0.2 0.044 0.0037674 0.040233 10.2166 0.034 0.0022561 0.031744 10.2333 0.031 0.0013469 0.029653 10.25 0.025 0.00080408 0.024196 1

0.2666 0.022 0.00048152 0.021518 10.2833 0.018 0.00028747 0.017713 1

0.3 0.015 0.00017162 0.014828 10.3166 0.012 0.00010277 0.011897 10.3333 0.009 6.1354E-005 0.0089386 10.4166 0.003 4.6815E-006 0.0029953 1

RESULTS FROM VISUAL CURVE MATCHING

VISUAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

EstimateK - 1.7944E-002yO - 1.8156E+000

AR30088I

Page 124: Documentin

A Q T E S O L V R E S U L T SVersion 1.10

10/24/91 09:15:11

TEST DESCRIPTION

Data set........... JCR202.DATData set title..... RISING HEAD SLUG TEST OF MW-202

Knowns and Constants:No. of data points.................. 35 •Radius of well casing............... 0.083Radius of well...................... 0.29Aquifer saturated thickness......... 8.7Well screen length.................. 10Static height of water in well...... 8.7Log(Re/Rw).......................... 2.599A, B, C............................. 0.000, 0.000, 2.113

ANALYTICAL METHOD

Bouwer and Rice (unconfined aquifer slug test)

RESULTS FROM STATISTICAL CURVE MATCHING

STATISTICAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

Estimate Std. ErrorK - 1.9123E-002 +/- 9.0446E-004yO - 1.3761E+000 +/- 4.6434E-002

ANALYSIS OF MODEL RESIDUALS

residual - calculated - observedweighted residual - residual * weight

Weighted Residual Statistics:Number of residuals............... 35Number of estimated parameters.... 2Degrees of freedom................ 33Residual mean..................... 0.02923Residual standard deviation....... 0.04343Residual variance................. 0.001886

Model Residuals:

Time Observed Calculated Residual Weight

AR300882

Page 125: Documentin

0.0083 1.196 1.1526 0.043411 10.0166 0.975 0.96535 0.0096462 10.025 0.795 0.80681 -0.01181 10.0333 0.649 0.67575 -0.026746 10.0416 0.536 0.56597 -0.029973 10.05 0.444 0.47302 -0.029021 1

0.0583 0.371 0.39618 -0.02518 10.0666 0.314 0.33182 -0.017821 10.075 0.267 0.27733 -0.010325 10.0833 0.229 0.23227 -0.0032743 1

0.1 0.175 0.16259 0.012408 10.1166 0.141 0.11406 0.026943 10.1333 0.118 0.07984 0.03816 10.15 0.106 0.055888 0.050112 1

0.1666 0.093 0.039205 0.053795 10.1833 0.087 0.027443 0.059557 1

0.2 0.081 0.01921 0.06179 10.2166 0.077 0.013476 0.063524 10.2333 0.071 0.0094331 0.061567 1

0.25 0.068 0.0066032 0.061397 10.2666 0.068 0.0046321 0.063368 10.2833 0.065 0.0032424 0.061758 1

0.3 0.062 0.0022697 0.05973 10.3166 0.058 0.0015922 0.056408 10.3333 0.058 0.0011145 0.056885 10.4166 0.049 0.00018812 0.048812 1

0.5 0.046 3.1684E-005 0.045968 10.5833 0.039 5.3479E-006 0.038995 10.6666 0.036 9.0265E-007 0.035999 10.75 0.033 1.5203E-007 0.033 1

0.8333 0.033 2.5661E-008 0.033 10.9166 0.03 4.3312E-009 0.03 1

1 0.027 7.2949E-010 0.027 11.0833 0.024 1.2313E-010 0.024 11.1666 0.02 2.0783E-011 0.02 • 1

RESULTS FROM VISUAL CURVE MATCHING

VISUAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

EstimateK - 1.9123E-002yO - 1.3761E+000

AR300883

Page 126: Documentin

A Q T E S O L V R E S U L T SVersion 1.10

10/23/91 13:13:17

TEST DESCRIPTION

Data set........... JCR204.DATData set title..... RISING HEAD SLUG TEST OF MW-204

Knowns and Constants:No. of data points.................. 61Radius of well casing............... 0.083Radius of well...................... 0.29Aquifer saturated thickness......... 13.7Well screen length.................. 15Static height of water in well...... 12.7Log(Re/Rw).......................... 2.751A, B, C............................. 3.127, 0.502, 0.000

ANALYTICAL METHOD

Bouwer and Rice (unconfined aquifer slug test)

RESULTS FROM STATISTICAL CURVE MATCHING

STATISTICAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

Estimate Std. ErrorK - 8.0593E-003 +/' 1.1844E-003yO - 1.4348E+000 +/- 1.4864E-001

ANALYSIS OF MODEL RESIDUALS

residual - calculated - observedweighted residual - residual * weight

Weighted Residual Statistics:Number of residuals............... 61Number of estimated parameters.... 2Degrees of freedom................ 59Residual mean..................... 0.07828Residual standard deviation....... 0.1512Residual variance................. 0.02285

Model Residuals:

Time Observed Calculated Residual Weight

AR3008814

Page 127: Documentin

0.0166 1.747 1.1609 0.58607 10.025 0.66 1.0429 -0.38295 10.0333 1.105 0.93815 0.16685 10.0416 0.613 0.84388 -0.23088 10.05 0.714 0.75812 -0.044122 1

0.0583 0.505 0.68194 -0.17694 10.0666 0.527 0.61342 -0.086422 10.075 0.407 0.55108 -0.14408 10.0833 0.401 0.49571 -0.094707 1

0.1 0.338 0.40058 -0.062582 10.1166 0.303 0.32412 -0.021125 10.1333 0.284 0.26193 0.022074 10.15 0.271 0.21166 0.059337 1

0.1666 0.262 0.17126 0.090737 10.1833 0.246 0.1384 0.1076 1

0.2 0.23 0.11184 0.11816 10.2166 0.221 0.090494 0.13051 10.2333 0.218 0.073128 0.14487 10.25 0.218 0.059095 0.15891 1

0.2666 0.214 0.047816 0.16618 10.2833 0.208 0.03864 0.16936 1

0.3 0.208 0.031225 0.17677 10.3166 0.199 0.025265 0.17373 10.3333 0.195 0.020417 0.17458 10.4166 0.183 0.0070539 0.17595 1

0.5 0.176 0.002434 0.17357 10.5833 0.173 0.00084092 0.17216 10.6666 0.167 0.00029053 0.16671 10.75 0.161 0.00010025 0.1609 1

0.8333 0.157 3.4635E-005 0.15697 10.9166 0.154 1.1966E-005 0.15399 1

1 0.148 4.129E-006 0.148 ' 11.0833 0.145 1.4265E-006 0.145 11.1666 0.142 4.9286E-007 0.142 11.25 0.139 1.7006E-007 0.139 1

1.3333 0.135 5.8755E-008 0.135 11.4166 0.129 2.0299E-008 0.129 1

1.5 0.126 7.0044E-009 0.126 11.5833 0.123 2.42E-009 0.123 11.6666 0.12 8.3608E-010 0.12 11.75 0.116 2.8849E-010 0.116 1

1.8333 0.113 9.9672E-011 0.113 11.9166 0.113 3.4436E-011 0.113 1

2 0.11 1.1882E-011 0.11 12.5 0.101 2.0157E-014 0.101 13 0.088 3.4194E-017 0.088 1

3.5 0.082 5.8007E-020 0.082 14 0.069 9.8403E-023 0.069 1

4.5 0.063 1.6693E-025 0.063 15 0.056 2.8318E-028 0.056 1

5.5 0.05 4.8038E-031 0.05 16 0.044 8.1492E-034 0.044 1

6.5 0.037 1.3824E-036 0.037 17 0.031 2.3452E-039 0.031 1

7.5 0.028 3.9783E-042 0.028 18 0.025 6.7488E-045 0.025 1

8.5 0.025 1.1449E-047 0.025 19 0.022 1.9421E-050 0.022 1

9.5 0.018 3.2946E-053 0.018 1

AR300885

Page 128: Documentin

10 0.012 5.589E-056 0.012 112 0.003 4.6286E-067 0.003 1

RESULTS FROM VISUAL CURVE MATCHING

VISUAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

EstimateK - 8.0593E-003yO - 1.4348E+000

AR300886

Page 129: Documentin

A Q T E S O L V R E S U L T SVersion 1.10

10/24/91 09:38:02

TEST DESCRIPTION

Data set........... JCR205.DATData set title..... RISING HEAD SLUG TEST OF MW-205

Knowns and Cons tants:No. of data points.................. 22Radius of well casing............... 0.083Radius of well...................... 0.29Aquifer saturated thickness......... 17.2Well screen length.................. 10Static height of water in well...... 16.7Log(Re/Rw).......................... 2.833A, B, C............................. 2.585, 0.421, 0.000

ANALYTICAL METHODI

Bouwer and Rice (unconfined aquifer slug test)

RESULTS FROM STATISTICAL CURVE MATCHING

STATISTICAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

Estimate Std. ErrorK - 2.5089E-002 +/- 1.1611E-003yO - 1.3869E+000 +/- 4.7970E-002

ANALYSIS OF MODEL RESIDUALS

residual - calculated - observedweighted residual - residual * weight

Weighted Residual Statistics:Number of residuals............... 21Number of estimated parameters.... 2Degrees of freedom................ 19Residual mean..................... 0.01626Residual standard deviation....... 0.03972Residual variance................. 0.001578

Model 'Residuals:

Time Observed Calculated Residual Weight

AR300887

Page 130: Documentin

0.0083 1.185 1.1204 0.064641 10.0166 0.903 0.90507 -0.0020691 10.025 0.676 0.72927 -0.053272 10.0333 0.546 0.58913 -0.043134 10.0416 0.436 0.47592 -0.039925 10.05 0.357 0.38348 -0.026483 1

0.0583 0.297 0.30979 -0.012792 10.0666 0.256 0.25026 0.005738 10.075 0.227 0.20165 0.025348 10.0833 0.196 0.1629 0.033098 1

0.1 0.155 0.10604 0.048963 10.1166 0.126 0.0692 0.0568 10.1333 0.101 0.045044 0.055956 1

0.15 0.079 0.029321 0.049679 10.1666 0.063 0.019135 0.043865 10.1833 0.05 0.012455 0.037545 1

0.2 0.041 0.0081075 0.032893 10.2166 0.031 0.005291 0.025709 10.2333 0.022 0.003444 0.018556 1

0.25 0.015 0,0022418 0.012758 10.2666 0.009 0.001463 0:007537 1

RESULTS FROM VISUAL CURVE MATCHING

VISUAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

EstimateK - 2.5089E-002yO - 1.3869E+000

AR300888

Page 131: Documentin

A Q T E S O L V R E S U L T SVersion 1.10

10/24/91 10:11:54

TEST DESCRIPTION

Data set........... JCR206.DATData set title..... RISING HEAD SLUG TEST OF MW-206

Knowns and Constants:No. of data points.................. 60Radius of well casing............... 0.083Radius of well...................... 0.29Aquifer saturated thickness......... 4.7Well screen length.................. 10Static height of water in well...... 4.7Log(Re/Rw) ........................... 2.192A, B, C.....;....................... 0.000, 0.000, 2.113

ANALYTICAL METHOD

Bouwer and Rice (unconfined aquifer slug test)

RESULTS FROM STATISTICAL CURVE MATCHING

STATISTICAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

Estimate Std. ErrorK - 1.3379E-002 +/- 7.0843E-004yO - 1.5369E+000 +/' 6.4135E-002

ANALYSIS OF MODEL RESIDUALS

residual - calculated - observedweighted residual - residual * weight

Weighted Residual Statistics:Number of residuals............... 60Number of estimated parameters.... 2Degrees of freedom................ 58Residual mean..................... 0.0295Residual standard deviation....... 0.04906Residual variance................. 0.002407

Model Residuals:

Time Observed Calculated Residual Weight

AR300889

Page 132: Documentin

0.0166 1.306 1.1453 0.16074 10.025 0.968 0.98688 -0.018878 10.0333 0.794 0.85191 -0.057906 10.0416 0.665 0.73539 -0.070394 10.05 0.564 0.63369 -0.069693 1

0.0583 0.488 0.54703 -0.059025 10.0666 0.428 0.47221 -0.044211 10.075 0.38 0.40691 -0.026907 10.0833 0.339 0.35126 -0.012256 1

0.1 0.279 0.26128 0.017717 10.1166 0.232 0.1947 0.037299 10.1333 0.2 0.14483 0.055171 10.15 0.172 0.10773 0.064269 1

0.1666 0.15 0.080278 0.069722 10.1833 0.134 0.059715 0.074285 1

0.2 0.118 0.044419 0.073581 10.2166 0.105 0.0331 0.0719 10.2333 0.096 0.024622 0.071378 1

0.25 0.09 0.018315 0.071685 10.2666 0.083 0.013648 0.069352 10.2833 0.077 0.010152 0.066848 1

0.3 0.071 0.0075515 0.063448 10.3166 0.067 0.0056272 0.061373 10.3333 0.064 0.0041858 0.059814 10.4166 0.048 0.00095666 0.047043 1

0.5 0.042 0.00021825 0.041782 10.5833 0.042 4.9881E-005 0.04195 10.666/5 0.039 1.14E-005 0.038989 1

0.75 0.036 2.6009E-006 0.035997 10.8333 0.036 5.9442E-007 0.035999 10.9166 0.036 1.3585E-007 0.036 1

1 0.036 3.0994E-008 0.036 11.0833 0.036 7.0835E-009 0.036 11.1666 0.033 1.6189E-009 0.033 1

1.25 0.033 3.6934E-010 0.033 11.3333 0.033 8.4413E-011 0.033 11.4166 0.033 1.9292E-011 0.033 1

1.5 0.029 4.4014E-012 0.029 11.5831 0.033 1.0059E-012 0.033 11.6666 0.033 2.299E-013 0.033 11.75 0.033 5.245E-014 0.033 1

1.8333 0.033 1.1987E-014 0.033 11.9166 0.033 2.7397E-015 0.033 1

2 0.033 6.2503E-016 0.033 12.5 0.029 8.876E-020 0.029 13 0.029 1.2605E-023 0.029 1

3.5 0.026 1.79E-027 0.026 14 0.029 2.5419E-031 0.029 1

4.5 0.029 3.6097E-035 0.029 15 0.026 5.1261E-039 0.026 1

5.5 0.026 7.2794E-043 0.026 16 0.026 1.0337E-046 0.026 1

6.5 0.023 1.468E-050 0.023 17 0.017 2.0847E-054 0.017 1

7.5 0.011 2.9604E-058 0.011 18 0.014 4.204E-062 0.014 1

8.5 0.011 5.97E-066 0.011 19 O.OH 8.478E-070 0.014 1

9.5 0.011 1.2039E-073 0.011 1

AR300890

Page 133: Documentin

10 0.011 1.7097E-077 0.011

RESULTS FROM VISUAL CURVE MATCHING

VISUAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

EstimateK - 1.3379E-002yO - 1.5369E+000

AR30089!

Page 134: Documentin

A Q T E S O L V R E S U L T SVersion 1.10

10/28/91 15:43:08

TEST DESCRIPTION

Data set........... jcr207.datData set title..... RISING HEAD SLUG TEST OF MW-207

Knowns and Constants:No. of data points.................. 30Radius of well casing............... 0.083Radius of well....................... 0.29Aquifer saturated thickness ......... 18.8Well screen length.................. 10Static height of water in well...... 18.3Log(Re/Rw).......................... 2.882A, B, C............................. 2.585, 0.421, 0.000

ANALYTICAL METHOD

Bouwer and Rice (unconfined aquifer slug test)

RESULTS FROM STATISTICAL CURVE MATCHING

STATISTICAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

Estimate Std. ErrorK - 1.5416E-002 +/- 1.1118E-003yO - 1.3985E+000 +/- 8.5784E-002

ANALYSIS OF MODEL RESIDUALS

residual - calculated - observedweighted residual - residual * weight

Weighted Residual Statistics:Number of residuals............... 30Number of estimated parameters.... 2Degrees of freedom................ 28Residual mean..................... 0.01957Residual standard deviation....... 0.05612Residual variance................. 0.00315

Model Residuals:

Time Observed Calculated Residual Weight

AR300892

Page 135: Documentin

0.025 1.052 0.94852 0.10348 10.0333 0.947 0.83381 0.11319 10.0416 0.635 0.73297 -0.097975 1

0.05 0.527 0.64333 -0.11633 10.0583 0.499 0.56553 -0.066534 10.0666 0.464 0.49714 -0.033143 10.075 0.401 0.43634 -0.035344 10.0833 0.353 0.38358 -0.030576 1

0.1 0.293 0.29595 -0.0029522 10.1166 0.243 0.2287 0.0143 10.1333 0.205 0.17646 0.028544 1

0.15 0.176 0.13615 0.039854 10.1666 0.154 0.10521 0.048791 10.1833 0.135 0.081175 0.053825 1

0.2 0.116 0.062631 0.053369 10.2166 0.101 0.048399 0.052601 10.2333 0.091 0.037343 0.053657 1

0.25 0.082 0.028812 0.053188 10.2666 0.075 0.022265 0.052735 10.2833 0.069 0.017179 0.051821 1

0.3 0.063 0.013254 0.049746 10.3166 0.056 0.010242 0.045758 10.3333 0.053 0.0079027 0.045097 10.4166 0.037 0.0021676 0.034832 1

0.5 0.028 0.00059361 0.027406 10.5833 0.018 0.00016282 0.017837 10.6666 0.012 4.4658E-005 0.011955 1

0.75 0.009 1.223E-005 0.0089878 10.8333 0.006 3.3545E-006 0.0059966 10.9166 0.003 9.2007E-007 0.0029991 1

RESULTS FROM VISUAL CURVE MATCHING

VISUAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

EstimateK - 1.5416E-002yO - 1.3985E+000

AR300893

Page 136: Documentin

A Q T E S O L V R E S U L T SVersion 1.10

10/23/91 - 13:55:43

TEST DESCRIPTION

Data set........... JCR208.DATData set title..... RISING HEAD SLUG TEST OF MW-208

Knowns and Constants:No. of data points.................. 42Radius of well casing............... 0.083Radius of well...................... 0.29Aquifer saturated thickness......... 22.3Well screen length.................. 10Static height of water in well...... 22.3Log(Re/Rw).......................... 3.179A, B, C............................. 0.000, 0.000, 2.113

ANALYTICAL METHOD

Bouwer and Rice (unconfined aquifer slug test)

RESULTS FROM STATISTICAL CURVE MATCHING

STATISTICAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

Estimate Std. ErrorK - 6.3086E-003 +/- 1.0356E-003yO - 9.7653E-001 +/- 8.5343E-002

ANALYSIS OF MODEL RESIDUALS

residual - calculated - observedweighted residual — residual * weight

Weighted Residual Statistics:Number of residuals............... 42Number of estimated parameters.... 2Degrees of freedom................ 40Residual mean..................... 0.08718Residual standard deviation....... 0.165Residual variance................. 0.02722

Model Residuals:

Time Observed Calculated Residual Weight

AR30089U

Page 137: Documentin

0.0083 1.178 0.93092 0.24708 10.0166 1.143 0.88745 0.25555 10.025 0.903 0.84552 0.057477 10.0333 0.742 0.80604 -0.064039 10.0416 0.688 0.7684 -0.080399 10.05 0.666 0.73209 -0.066095 1

0.0583 0.628 0.69791 -0.069907 10.0666 0.578 0.66532 -0.087317 10.075 0.537 0.63388 -0.096883 10.0833 0.499 0.60428 -0.10528 1

0.1 0.445 0.54885 -0.10385 10.1166 0.398 0.49878 -0.10078 10.1333 0.36 0.45303 -0.093026 10.15 0.331 0.41147 -0.080466 1

0.1666 0.312 0.37393 -0.061935 10.1833 0.297 0.33963 -0.042631 1

0.2 0.284 0.30847 -0.024474 10.2166 0.274 0.28034 -0.0063363 10.2333 0.268 0.25462 0.013381 10.25 0.262 0.23126 0.030739 1

0.2666 0.259 0.21017 0.048834 10.2833 0.255 0.19089 0.064114 1

0.3 0.252 0.17337 0.078626 10.3166 0.249 0.15756 0.09144 10.3333 0.249 0.14311 0.10589 10.4166 0.243 0.088555 0.15444 1

0.5 0.24 0.054767 0.18523 10.58-33 0.236 0.03389 0.20211 10.6666 0.236 0.020972 0.21503 10.75 0.236 0.01297 0.22303 1

0.8333 0.233 0.0080259 0.22497 10.9166 0.236 0.0049665 0.23103 1

1 0.233 0.0030715 0.22993 11.0833 0.233 0.0019007 0.2311 11-1666 0.233 0.0011762 0.23182 11.25 0.233 0.0007274 0.23227 1

1.3333 0.233 0.00045012 0.23255 11.4166 0.233 0.00027854 0.23272 1

1.5 0.233 0.00017226 0.23283 11.5833 0.23 0.0001066 0.22989 11.6666 0.233 6.5964E-005 0.23293 11.75 0.23 4.0795E-005 0.22996 1

RESULTS FROM VISUAL CURVE MATCHING

VISUAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

EstimateK - 6.3086E-003yO - 9.7653E-001

AR300895

Page 138: Documentin

A Q T E S O L V R E S U L T SVersion 1.10

10/28/91 10:58:22

TEST DESCRIPTION

Data set........... JCR209.DATData set title..... RISING HEAD SLUG TEST OF MW-209

Knowns and Constants:No. of data points.................. 38Radius of well casing............... 0.083Radius of well...................... 0.29Aquifer saturated thickness......... 10Well screen length.................. 10Static height of water in well...... 10Log(Re/Rw).......................... 2.688A, B, C............................. 0.000, 0.000, 2.113

ANALYTICAL METHOD

Bouwer and Rice (unconfined aquifer slug test)

RESULTS FROM STATISTICAL CURVE MATCHING

STATISTICAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

Estimate Std. ErrorK - 9.5843E-003 +/- 8.9848E-004yO - 8.4580E-001 +/- 4.7908E-002

ANALYSIS OF MODEL RESIDUALS

residual - calculated - observedweighted residual - residual * weight

Weighted Residual Statistics:Number of residuals............... 38Number of estimated parameters.... 2Degrees of freedom................ 36Residual mean..................... 0.01998Residual standard deviation....... 0.06958Residual variance................. 0.004841

Model 'Residuals:

Time Observed Calculated Residual Weight

AR300896

Page 139: Documentin

0.0083 " 0.96 0.77617 0.18383 10.0166 0.885 0.71228 0.17272 10.025 0.589 0.65297 -0.063967 10.0333 0.476 0.59921 -0.12321 10.0416 0.451 0.54989 -0.098887 10.05 0.425 0.5041 -0.079098 1

0.0583 0.388 0.4626 -0.0746 10.0666 0.356 0.42452 -0.068519 10.075 0.331 0.38917 -0.058169 10.0833 0.312 0.35713 -0.045133 1

0.1 0.278 0.30044 -0.022443 10.1166 0.252 0.25301 -0.0010141 10.1333 0.221 0.21285 0.0081481 10.15 0.208 0.17906 0.028935 1

0.1666 0.186 0.1508 0.035203 10.1833 0.171 0.12686 0.04414 1

0.2 0.161 0.10672 0.054277 10.2166 0.149 0.089875 0.059125 10.2333 0.142 0.075609 0.066391 1

0.25 0.133 0.063607 0.069393 10.2666 0.127 0.053566 0.073434 10.2833 0.117 0.045063 0.071937 1

0.3 0.111 0.03791 '0.07309 10.3166 0.105 0.031925 0.073075 10.3333 0.101 0.026858 0.074142 10.4166 0.076 0.01134 0.06466 1

0.5 0.06 0.0047835 0.055217 10.58&3 0.048 0.0020198 0.04598 10.6666 0.038 0.00085284 0.037147 1

0.75 0.029 0.00035973 0.02864 10.8333 0.023 0.0001519 0.022848 10.9166 0.016 6.4137E-005 0.015936 1

1 0.013 2.7053E-005 0.012973 11.0833 0.01 1.1423E-005 0.0099886 11.1666 0.007 4.8233E-006 0.0069952 1

1.25 0.004 2.0345E-006 0.003998 11.3333 0.001 8.5906E-007 0.00099914 11.4166 0.001 3.6273E-007 0.00099964 1

RESULTS FROM VISUAL CURVE MATCHING

VISUAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

EstimateK - 9.5843E-003yO - 8.4580E-001

3R300897

Page 140: Documentin

A Q T E S O L V R E S U L T SVersion 1.10

10/23/91 13:59:47

TEST DESCRIPTION

Data set........... JCR210.DATData set title..... RISING HEAD SLUG TEST OF MW-210

Knowns and Constants:No. of data points.................. 60Radius of well casing............... 0.083Radius of well...................... 0.29Aquifer saturated thickness......... 8.2Well screen length.................. 10Static height of water in well...... 8.2Log(Re/Rw).......................... 2.561A, B, C............................. 0.000, 0.000, 2.113

ANALYTICAL METHOD

Bouwer and Rice (unconfined aquifer slug test)

RESULTS FROM STATISTICAL CURVE MATCHING

STATISTICAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

Estimate Std. ErrorK - 1.0446E-003 +/- 7.8377E-005yO - 1.3384E+000 +/- 3.6561E-002

ANALYSIS OF MODEL RESIDUALS

residual - calculated - observedweighted residual - residual * weight

Weighted Residual Statistics:Number of residuals............... 60Number of estimated parameters...; 2Degrees of freedom................ 58Residual mean..................... 0.04708Residual standard deviation....... 0.1291Residual variance................. 0.01666

Model Residuals:

Time Observed Calculated Residual Weight

AR300898

Page 141: Documentin

0.0083 1.681 1.3253 0.35569 l0.0166 1.529 1.3124 0.21665 10.025 1.456 1.2994 0.15664 10.0333 1.466 1.2867 0.17934 l0.0416 1.472 1.2741 0.19792 1

0.05 1.336 1.2615 0.074534 10.0583 1.282 1.2491 0.03287 10.0666 1.254 1.2369 0.017086 10.075 1.226 1.2247 0.0013274 10.0833 1.194 1.2127 -0.018696 1

0.1 1.143 1.189 -0.045952 10.1166 1.102 1.1658 -0.063812 10.1333 1.061 1.143 -0.081986 1

0.15 1.03 1.1206 -0.090607 10.1666 0.998 1.0988 -0.1008 10.1833 0.97 1.0773 -0.10728 1

0.2 0.944 1.0562 -0.11219 10.2166 0.919 1.0356 -0.11663 10.2333 0.897 1.0154 -0.11836 1

0.25 0.875 0.99548 -0.12048 10.2666 0.853 0.9761 -0.1231 10.2833 0.834 0.95699 -0.12299 1

0.3 0.818 0.93825 -0.12025 10.3166 0.799 0.91999 -0.12099 10.3333 0.783 0.90198 -0.11898 10.4166 0.71 0.81726 -0.10726 1

0.5 0.65 0.74042 -0.090416 10.5833 0.6 0.67087 -0.070874 10.6666 0.559 0.60786 -0.048864 1

0.75 0.521 0.55071 -0.029707 10.8333 0.489 0.49898 -0.0099828 10.9166 0.461 0.45212 0.008883 1

1 0.436 0.4096 0.026395 11-0833 0.41 0.37113 0.038867 11.1666 0.391 0.33628 0.054724 1

1.25 0.369 0.30466 0.064344 11.3333 0.353 0.27604 0.076958 11.4166 0.338 0.25012 0.087885 1

1.5 0.322 0.2266 0.095403 11.5833 0.309 0.20531 0.10369 11.6666 0.3 0.18603 0.11397 1

1.75 0.29 0.16854 0.12146 11.8333 0.281 0.15271 0.12829 11.9166 0.271 0.13837 0.13263 1

2 0.262 0.12536 0.13664 12.5 0.224 0.069348 0.15465 13 0.205 0.038364 0.16664 1

3.5 0.192 0.021223 0.17078 14 0.18 0.011741 0.16826 1

4.5 0.176 0.0064951 0.1695 15 0.167 0.0035932 0.16341 1

5.5 0.161 0.0019878 0.15901 16 0.154 0.0010997 0.1529 1

6.5 0.151 0.00060834 0.15039 17 0.151 0.00033654 0.15066 1

7.5 0.154 0.00018618 0.15381 18 0.148 0.00010299 0.1479 1

8.5 0.148 5.6977E-005 0.14794 19 0.145 3.152E-005 0.14497 1

AR300899

Page 142: Documentin

9.5 0.142 1.7437E-005 0.14198

RESULTS FROM VISUAL CURVE MATCHING

VISUAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

EstimateK - 1.0446E-003yO - 1.3384E+000

AR300900

Page 143: Documentin

A Q T E S O L V R E S U L T SVersion 1.10

10/23/91 13:43:20

TEST DESCRIPTION

Data set........... JCR211.DATData set title..... RISING HEAD SLUG TEST OF MW-211

Knowns and Constants:No. of data points.................. 56Radius of well casing............... 0.083Radius of well...................... 0.29Aquifer saturated thickness......... 13Well screen length.................. 10Static height of water in well...... 13Log(Re/Rw).......................... 2.853A, B, C............................. 0.000, 0.000, 2.113

ANALYTICAL METHODtBouwer and Rice (unconfined aquifer slug test)

RESULTS FROM STATISTICAL CURVE MATCHING

STATISTICAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

Estimate Std. ErrorK - 9.9033E-004 +/- 6.5362E-005yO - 1.1025E+000 +/- 2.7182E-002

ANALYSIS OF MODEL RESIDUALS

residual - calculated - observedweighted residual - residual * weight

Weighted Residual Statistics:Number of residuals............... 56Number of estimated parameters.... 2Degrees of freedom................ 54Residual mean..................... 0.02149Residual standard deviation....... 0.09348Residual variance................. 0.008738

Model Residuals:

Time Observed Calculated Residual Weight

AR3Q090I

Page 144: Documentin

0.025 1.494 1.0751 0.41889 10.0333 1.279 1.0662 0.21285 10.0416 1.071 1.0573 0.013726 10.05 1.207 1.0484 0.15864 1

0.0583 1.074 1.0396 0.034373 10.0666 1.064 1.031 0.033033 10.075 1.052 1.0223 0.029724 10.0833 1.011 1.0138 -0.0027599 1

0.1 0.976 0.99684 -0.02084 10.1166 0.944 0.9803 -0.036301 10.1333 0.913 0.96394 -0.05094 10.15 0.887 0.94785 -0.060851 1

0.1666 0.865 0.93213 -0.067125 10.1833 0.843 0.91657 -0.073568 1

0.2 0.824 0.90127 -0.07727 10.2166 0.808 0.88632 -0.078317 10.2333 0.789 0.87152 -0.082524 10.25 0.774 0.85698 -0.082978 1

0.2666 0.758 0.84276 -0.08476 10.2833 0.745 0.82869 -0.083694 1

0.3 0.729 0.81486 -0.085863 10.3166 0.717 0.80134 -0.084343 10.3333 0.704 0.78797 -0.083969 10.4166 0.647 0.72452 -0.077516 1

0.5 0.597 0.66611 -0.069106 10.5833 0.556 0.61247 -0.056467 10.6666 0.518 0.56315 -0.045147 10.75 0.483 0.51775 -0.034747 1

0.8333 0.455 0.47605 -0.021054 10.9166 0.429 0.43772 -0.0087195 1

1 0.404 0.40243 0.0015691 11.0833 0.382 0.37002 0.011975 11.1666 0.363 0.34023 0.022772 11.25 0.344 0.3128 0.031201 1

1.3333 0.328 0.28761 0.04039 11.4166 0.312 0.26445 0.04755 1

1.5 0.297 0.24313 0.05387 11.5833 0.284 0.22355 0.060448 11.6666 0.271 0.20555 0.06545 11.75 0.259 0.18898 0.070021 1

1.8333 0.246 0.17376 0.072239 11.9166 0.236 0.15977 0.076231 1

2 0.23 0.14689 0.083112 12.5 0.183 0.088743 0.094257 13 0.151 0.053614 0.097386 1

3.5 0.135 0.032391 0.10261 14 0.12 0.019569 0.10043 1

4.5 0.101 0.011823 0.089177 15 0.094 0.0071429 0.086857 1

5.5 0.085 0.0043154 0.080685 16 0.082 0.0026072 0.079393 1

6.5 0.072 0.0015751 0.070425 17 0.069 0.00095162 0.068048 1

7.5 0.066 0.00057493 0.065425 18 0.05 0.00034734 0.049653 1

8.5 0.05 0.00020985 0.04979 1

AR300902

Page 145: Documentin

RESULTS FROM VISUAL CURVE MATCHING

VISUAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

EstimateK - 9.9033E-004yO - 1.1025E+000

AR300903

Page 146: Documentin

A Q T E S O L V R E S U L T SVersion 1.10

10/23/91 14:14:13

TEST DESCRIPTION

Data set........... JCR212.DATData set title..... RISING HEAD SLUG TEST OF MW-212

Knowns and Constants:No. of data points.................. 46Radius of well casing............... 0.083Radius of well...................... 0.29Aquifer saturated thickness......... 34Well screen length.................. 10Static height of water in well...... 34Log(Re/Rw).......................... 3.423A, B, C............................. 0.000, 0.000, 2.113

ANALYTICAL METHOD

Bouwer and Rice (unconfined aquifer slug test)

RESULTS FROM STATISTICAL CURVE MATCHING

STATISTICAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

Estimate Std. ErrorK - 7.8062E-003 +/' 9.7069E-005yO - 1.6064E+000 +/' 1.1011E-002

ANALYSIS OF MODEL RESIDUALS

residual - calculated - observedweighted residual - residual * weight

Weighted Residual Statistics:Number of residuals............... 46Number of estimated parameters.... 2Degrees of freedom................ 44Residual mean..................... 0.009196Residual standard deviation....... 0.02005Residual variance................. 0.000402

Model Residuals:

Time Observed Calculated Residual Weight

Page 147: Documentin

0.0083 1.579 1.5205 0.058531 10.0166 1.466 1.4392 0.026838 10.025 1.349 1.3613 -0.012301 10.0333 1.292 1.2885 0.0034942 10.0416 1.21 1.2196 -0.0096031 10.05 1.14 1.1536 -0.013621 1

0.0583 1.077 1.0919 -0.014931 10.0666 1.017 1.0335 -0.01654 10.075 0.96 0.97762 -0.017624 10.0833 0.906 0.92535. -0.019346 1

0.1 0.808 0.82848 -0.020478 10.1166 0.723 0.74224 -0.019241 10.1333 0.647 0.66454 -0.017541 10.15 0.581 0.59497 -0.013975 1

0.1666 0.524 0.53304 -0.0090436 10.1833 0.473 0.47724 -0.0042429 1

0.2 0.429 0.42728 0.0017165 10.2166 0.388 0.38281 0.0051925 10.2333 0.35 0.34273 0.007266 10.25 0.319 0.30686 0.012145 1

0.2666 0.29 0.27491 0.015085 10.2833 0.265 0.24614 0.018864 1

0.3 0.243 0.22037 0.02263 10.3166 0.221 0.19743 0.023569 10.3333 0.202 0.17676 0.025237 10.4166 0.132 0.10182 0.030176 1

0.5 0.088 0.058617 0.029383 10.5833 0.063 0.033766 0.029234 10.6666 0.044 0.019451 0.024549 10.75 0.034 0.011197 0.022803 1

0.8333 0.028 0.0064501 0.02155 10.9166 0.022 0.0037156 0.018284 1

1 0.022 0.0021389 0.019861 11.0833 0.018 0.0012321 0.016768 11.1666 0.018 0.00070977 0.01729 11.25 0.018 0.00040859 0.017591 1

1.3333 0.018 0.00023537 0.017765 11.4166 0.018 0.00013558 0.017864 1

1.5 0.018 7.8051E-005 0.017922 11.5833 0.015 4.4961E-005 0.014955 11.6666 0.015 2.59E-005 0.014974 11.75 0.015 1.491E-005 0.014985 1

1.8333 0.015 8.5886E-006 0.014991 11.9166 0.012 4.9475E-006 0.011995 1

2 0.012 2.8481E-006 0.011997 12.5 0.006 1.0393E-007 0.0059999 1

RESULTS FROM VISUAL CURVE MATCHING

VISUAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

EstimateK - 7.8062E-003yO - 1.6064E+000

AR300905

Page 148: Documentin

A Q T E S O L V R E S U L T SVersion 1.10

10/23/91 14:20:53

TEST DESCRIPTION

Data set........... JCR302.DATData set title..... RISING HEAD SLUG TEST OF MW-302

Knowns and Constants:No. of data points.................. 44Radius of well casing............... 0.166Radius of well...................... 0.333Aquifer saturated thickness......... 79Well screen length.................. 20Static height of water in well...... 79Log(Re/Rw).......................... 3.985A, B, C............................. 0.000, 0.000, 2.991

ANALYTICAL METHOD

Bouwer and Rice (unconfined aquifer slug test)

RESULTS FROM STATISTICAL CURVE MATCHING

STATISTICAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

Estimate Std. ErrorK - 4.3282E-003 +/- 7.7625E-005yO -. 2.0154E+000 +/- 1.8932E-002

ANALYSIS OF MODEL RESIDUALS

residual - calculated - observedweighted residual - residual * weight

Weighted Residual Statistics:Number of residuals............... 44Number of estimated parameters.... 2Degrees of freedom................ 42Residual mean..................... 0.01286Residual standard deviation....... 0.03467Residual variance................. 0.001202

Model Residuals:

Time Observed Calculated Residual Weight

AR300906

Page 149: Documentin

0.1 ' 1.792 1.7215 0.070532 10.1166 1.726 1.677 0.049001 10.1333 1.67 1.6334 0.036579 1

0.15 1.616 1.591 0.025025 10.1666 1.566 1.5499 0.016123 10.1833 1.516 1.5096 0.0063978 1

0.2 1.468 1.4704 -0.0023741 10.2166 1.424 1.4324 -0.0083912 10.2333 1.38 1.3952 -0.01517 10.25 1.339 1.3589 -0.019915 1

0.2666 1.299 1.3238 -0.024811 10.2833 1.258 1.2894 -0.031411 1

0.3 1.223 1.2559 -0.032905 10.3166 1.188 1.2235 -0.035462 10.3333 1.151 1.1917 -0.04067 10.4166 1.012 1.045 -0.033008 1

0.5 0.88 0.91625 -0.036251 10.5833 0.767 0.80349 -0.036486 10.6666 0.676 0.7046 -0.028599 10.75 0.597 0.61778 -0.020784 1

0.8333 0.528 0.54175 -0.013752 10.9166 0.468 0.47508 -0.0070772 1

1 0.418 0.41654 0.0014575 11.0833 0.374 0.36528 0.0087225 11.1666 0.339 0.32032 0.018678 1

1.25 0.305 0.28085 0.024145 11.3333 0.276 0.24629 0.029711 11.416r'6 0.248 0.21598 0.032022 1

1.5 0.226 0.18937 0.036633 11.5833 0.207 0.16606 0.040939 11.6666 0.188 0.14562 0.042377 1

1.75 0.172 0.12768 0.044319 11.8333 0.157 0.11197 0.045033 11.9166 0.144 0.098187 0.045813 1

2 0.135 0.086089 0.048911 12.5 0.091 0.039138 0.051862 13 0.066 0.017793 0.048207 1

3.5 0.053 0.0080888 0.044911 14 0.047 0.0036773 0.043323 1

4.5 0.037 0.0016718 0.035328 15 0.031 0.00076 0.03024 1

5.5 0.028 0.00034551 0.027654 16 0.031 0.00015707 0.030843 1

6.5 0.018 7.1409E-005 0.017929 1

RESULTS FROM VISUAL CURVE MATCHING

VISUAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

EstimateK - 4.3282E-003yO - 2.0154E+000

flR300907

Page 150: Documentin

A Q T E S O L V R E S U L T SVersion 1.10

10/23/91 14:30:16

TEST DESCRIPTION

Data set........... JCR303.DATData set title..... RISING HEAD SLUG TEST OF MW-303

Knowns and Constants:No. of data points.................. 32Radius of well casing............... 0.166Radius of well...................... 0.333Aquifer saturated thickness......... 60Well screen length.................. 20Static height of water in well...... 60Log(Re/Rw).......................... 3.823A, B, C............................. 0.000, 0.000, 2.991

ANALYTICAL METHOD

Bouwer and Rice (unconfined aquifer slug test)

RESULTS FROM STATISTICAL CURVE MATCHING

STATISTICAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

Estimate Std. ErrorK - 5.0618E-002 +/' 1.4698E-003yO - 1.5893E+000 +/' 3.2055E-002

ANALYSIS OF MODEL RESIDUALS

residual - calculated - observedweighted residual - residual * weight

Weighted Residual Statistics:Number of residuals............... 32Number of estimated parameters.... 2Degrees of freedom................ 30Residual mean..................... 0.01352Residual standard deviation....... 0.03205Residual variance................. 0.001027

Model Residuals:

Time Observed Calculated Residual Weight

AR300908

Page 151: Documentin

0.0083 1.418 1.355 0.06303 10.0166 1.115 1.1552 -0.040169 10.025 1.001 0.98294 0.018062 10.0333 0.789 0.838 -0.048996 10.0416 0.695 0.71443 -0.019427 10.05 0.641 0.60791 0.033091 1

0.0583 0.486 0.51827 -0.032268 10.0666 0.413 0.44184 -0.028845 10.075 0.353 0.37597 -0.022968 10.0833 0.303 0.32053 -0.017528 1

0.1 0.233 0.23252 0.00047871 10.1166 0.192 0.169 0.022997 10.1333 0.161 0.1226 0.0384 10.15 0.129 0.088938 0.040062 1

0.1666 0.11 0.064643 0.045357 10.1833 0.091 0.046894 0.044106 1

0.2 0.078 0.034018 0.043982 10.2166 0.066 0.024725 0.041275 10.2333 0.06 0.017937 0.042063 10.25 0.047 0.013012 0.033988 1

0.2666 0.041 0.0094573 0.031543 10.2833 0.037 0.0068606 0.030139 1

0.3 0.034 0.0049769 0.029023 10.3166 0.028 0.0036174 0.024383 10.3333 0.025 0.0026241 0.022376 10.4166 0.015 0.00052922 0.014471 1

0.5 0.006 0.00010653 0.0058935 10.58*33 0.006 2.1484E-005 0.0059785 10.6666 0.003 4.3327E-006 0.0029957 1

0.75 0.003 8.7212E-007 0.0029991 10.8333 0.003 1.7589E-007 0.0029998 10.9166 0.003 3.5472E-008 0.003 1

RESULTS FROM VISUAL CURVE MATCHING

VISUAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

EstimateK - 5.0618E-002yO - 1.5893E+000

AR300909

Page 152: Documentin

A Q T E S O L V R E S U L T SVersion 1.10

10/23/91 14:36:17

TEST DESCRIPTION

Data set........... JCR305.DATData set title..... RISING HEAD SLUG TEST OF MW-305

Knowns and Constants:No. of data points.................. 52Radius of well casing............... 0.166Radius of well...................... 0.333Aquifer saturated thickness......... 74.3Well screen length.................. 20Static height of water in well...... 74.3Log(Re/Rw).......................... 3.949A, B, C............................. 0.000, 0.000, 2.991

^ ANALYTICAL METHOD

Bouwer and Rice (unconfined aquifer slug test)

RESULTS FROM STATISTICAL CURVE MATCHING

STATISTICAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

Estimate Std. ErrorK - 2.0986E-003 +/' 3.5344E-004yO - 1.5015E+000 +/' 1.1262E-001

ANALYSIS OF MODEL RESIDUALS

residual - calculated - observedweighted residual - residual * weight

Weighted Residual Statistics:Number of residuals............... 52Number of estimated parameters.... 2Degrees of freedom................ 50Residual mean..................... 0.1341Residual standard deviation....... 0.2922Residual variance................. 0.08535

Model Residuals:

Time Observed Calculated Residual Weight

AR3009IO

Page 153: Documentin

0.1166 1.777 1.3723 0.40467 10.1333 1.685 1.3548 0.33024 1

0.15 1.604 1.3374 0.26658 10.1666 1.528 1.3204 0.20759 10.1833 1.462 1.3035 0.15849 1

0.2 1.38 1.2868 0.093179 10.2166 1.324 1.2704 0.053552 10.2333 1.267 1.2542 0.012813 1

0.25 1.217 1.2381 -0.021134 10.2666 1.17 1.2224 -0.05238 10.2833 1.126 1.2067 -0.080734 1

0.3 1.085 1.1913 -0.10629 10.3166 1.047 1.1761 -0.12913 10.3333 1.012 1.1611 -0.14908 10.4166 0.877 1.0888 -0.21182 1

0.5 0.773 1.021 -0.24797 10.5833 0.695 0.95743 -0.26243 10.6666 0.641 0.89784 -0.25684 1

0.75 0.6 0.8419 -0.2419 10.8333 0.572 0.7895 -0.2175 10.9166 0.547 0.74037 -0.19337 1

1 0.528 0.69424 -0.16624 11.0833 0.515 0.65103 -0.13603 11.1666 0.506 0.61051 -0.10451 1

1.25 0.496 0.57247 -0.076472 , 11.3333 0.49 0.53684 -0.046843 11.4166 0.487 0.50343 -0.016432 1

1.5 0.481 0.47206 0.0089361 11.5833 0.478 0.44268 0.035316 11.6666 0.474 0.41513 0.058867 11.75 0.471 0.38927 0.081733 1

1.8333 0.468 0.36504 0.10296 11.9166 0.468 0.34232 0.12568 1

2 0.465 0.32099 0.14401 12.5 0.465 0.21827 0.24673 13 0.462 0.14842 0.31358 1

3.5 0.465 0.10092 0.36408 14 0.465 0.068623 0.39638 1

4.5 0.465 0.046662 0.41834 15 0.462 0.031729 0.43027 1

5.5 0.452 0.021575 0.43043 16 0.449 0.01467 0.43433 1

6.5 0.452 0.0099755 0.44202 17 0.459 0.0067831 0.45222 1

7.5 0.462 0.0046123 0.45739 18 0.462 0.0031363 0.45886 1

8.5 0.462 0.0021326 0.45987 19 0.462 0.0014501 0.46055 1

9.5 0.462 0.00098604 0.46101 110 0.456 0.00067048 0.45533 112 0.462 0.00014334 0.46186 114 0.465 3.0643E-005 0.46497 1

RESULTS FROM VISUAL CURVE MATCHING

VISUAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

AR3009II

Page 154: Documentin

EstimateK - 2.0986E-003yO - 1.5015E+000

AR3009I2

Page 155: Documentin

A Q T E S O L V R E S U L T SVersion 1.10

10/28/91 11:12:56

TEST DESCRIPTION

Data set........... JCR309.DATData set title..... RISING HEAD SLUG TEST OF MW-309

Knowns and Constants:No. of data points.................. 62Radius of well casing............... 0.16Radius of well...................... 0.33Aquifer saturated thickness......... 82.3Well screen length.................. 20Static height of water in well...... 82.3Log(Re/Rw).......................... 4.016A, B, C............................. 0.000, 0.000, 3.010

, ANALYTICAL METHOD

Bouwer and Rice (unconfined aquifer slug test)

RESULTS FROM STATISTICAL CURVE MATCHING

STATISTICAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

Estimate Std. ErrorK - 1.2086E-002 +/- 3.6133E-004yO - 2.2475E+000 +/- 3.3752E-002

ANALYSIS OF MODEL RESIDUALS

residual - calculated - observedweighted residual - residual * weight

Weighted Residual Statistics:Number of residuals............... 62Number of estimated parameters.... 2Degrees of freedom................ 60Residual mean..................... 0.03738Residual standard deviation....... 0.07072Residual variance................. 0.005001

Model Residuals:

Time Observed Calculated Residual Weight

Page 156: Documentin

0.0083 2.386 2.1615 0.22453 10.0166 2.124 2.0787 0.045255 10.025 2.061 1.9982 0.062755 10.0333 1.912 1.9218 -0.009765 10.0416 1.843 1.8482 -0.0052124 10.05 1.754 1.7766 -0.022639 1

0.0583 1.666 1.7086 -0.042641 10.0666 1.587 1.6432 -0.056246 10.075 1.517 1.5796 -0.06261 10.0833 1.454 1.5192 -0.065153 1

0.1 1.337 1.4044 -0.067431 10.1166 1.23 1.299 -0.068984 10.1333 1.138 1.2009 -0.062888 10.15 1.056 1.1102 -0.054201 1

0.1666 0.98 1.0268 -0.046845 10.1833 0.914 0.9493 -0.035301 1

0.2 0.847 0.87761 -0.030613 10.2166 0.797 0.81172 -0.01472 10.2333 0.74 0.75042 -0.010421 10.25 0.696 0.69375 0.0022483 1

0.2666 0.651 0.64166 0.0093366 10.2833 0.62 0.59321 0.026793 1

0.3 0.582 0.54841 0.03359 10.3166 0.547 0.50723 0.039766 10.3333 0.512 0.46893 0.043071 10.4166 0.392 0.31696 0.075035 1

0.5 0.313 0.21415 0.098854 10.583/3 0.256 0.14475 0.11125 10.6666 0.215 0.09784 0.11716 1

0.75 0.187 0.066102 0.1209 10.8333 0.162 0.044681 0.11732 10.9166 0.146 0.030201 0.1158 1

1 0.13 0.020404 0.1096 11.0833 0.117 0.013792 0.10321 11.1666 0.111 0.0093224 0.10168 1

1.25 0.102 0.0062984 0.095702 11.3333 0.095 0.0042573 0.090743 11.4166 0.089 0.0028776 0.086122 1

1.5 0.086 0.0019442 0.084056 11.5833 0.083 0.0013141 0.081686 11.6666 0.076 0.00088826 0.075112 1

1.75 0.073 0.00060012 0.0724 11.8333 0.07 0.00040564 0.069594 11.9166 0.07 0.00027419 0.069726 1

2 0.067 0.00018524 0.066815 12.5 0.054 1.7651E-005 0.053982 13 0.048 1.6818E-006 0.047998 1

3.5 0.045 1.6024E-007 0.045 14 0.045 1.5268E-008 0.045 1

4.5 0.041 1.4548E-009 0.041 15 0.038 1.3862E-010 0.038 1

5.5 0.038 1.3208E-011 0.038 16 0.035 1.2585E-012 0.035 1

6.5 0.032 1.1991E-013 0.032 17 0.032 1.1425E-014 0.032 1

7.5 0.032 1.0886E-015 0.032 18 0.032 1.0373E-016 0.032 1

8.5 0.032 9.8833E-018 0.032 19 0.029 9.417E-019 0.029 1

AR3009U

Page 157: Documentin

9.5 0.029 8.9727E-020 0.029 110 0.032 8.5494E-021 0.032 112 0.029 7.0467E-025 0.029 1

RESULTS FROM VISUAL CURVE MATCHING

VISUAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES

EstimateK - 1.2086E-002yO - 2.2475E+000

AR3009I5

Page 158: Documentin

A-3

Groundwater Elevation Logs

AR3009I6

Page 159: Documentin

30 Gonnett Fleming-*l ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS

GROUNDWATER LEVEL MEASUREMENT DATAPROJECT/LOCATION JWiL's £^efc- S.'-f-n / .tfW/sfou) . PAPROJECT NO. 2. -} 3c>-7. &=> I \ INSTRUMENT MANUFACTURER & MODEL So 1 t v\-S±- 1 OO - foer* \M L 1DATE(S) to - - 1 1 \ INSTRUMENT NO. Cf- * (O463 | CALIBRATION DATEMEASURED BY K0cj- ^i^ 1 TIDAL INFLUENCE d YES IS NOWEATHER CONDITIONS Suun^ , kUk ~?O"F

WELL ORPIEZOMETER

NO.DATEmME

REFERENCEPOINT

ELEVATION(FT.)

WATER LEVELMEASUREMENT

(FT.)

ADJUSTEDMEASUREMENT

(FT.)

GROUNDWATERELEVATION

(FT.)

{01.0

/£>££> 23. JO 526.

tits' 13 .

MU) - 16 -

(0-1 \-i3o 57

MM- 52. 9.

(JO -302. t-2.37 527. 2.1

-zoo to-1 1+10 535. 14uO - ZOO'S If/3 535.43

/42S" 30 2-2.S&

lo-q 52.3.3$

MIA/-2./I tO-1 £+2. 67 52 .22.

AHA; - lies' . SO 5.52.£2 7.. 24 -OS"

1500

GENERAL REMARKS ._ fa\*3 - 2.O O lps\£(L<><JUre£ -f -f , -f-ap erf-j~, r ~ 7 _ ^ ~ . — j i • T_ i.' x—i ' Ipx?i-»vr x^l-g t/Q.TigHr>—t-ftrS&m——t-rnw-iJ

SHEET NO. __L. OF.

AR3009I7

Page 160: Documentin

Gannett FlemingAND PLANNERS

GROUNDWATER LEVEL MEASUREMENT DATAPROJECT/LOCATION J-bx^ '.? rree.£ .Tstr / L. f us/S /o,. xv-7 , /V?PROJECT NO. A~73n~7,OG/ INSTRUMENT MANUFACTURER & MODEL

- O g - "7 / __________I. INSTRUMENT NO._______________\ CALIBRATION DATEMEASURED BY XWeo . m ao/r, //*,r* fy-rarsoA TIDAL INFLUENCE D YES BT NOWEATHER CONDITIONS

GENERAL REMARKS rcxj^d n~f n rot )/->d njofa T /£,;(>! sntQS&rt/nP/?/^

/G O j6 O O fc_____A/f>. V ~

SHEET NO. / OF

AR3009I8

Page 161: Documentin

GENERAL REMARKS.

SHEET NO. _/_ OF.

AR3009I9

Page 162: Documentin

s-*

ENGINEERS AND PLANNERSSB Gannett Fleming" ' * CKtriiMCCDo Akin DI AKIKICDO *

GROUNDWATER LEVEL MEASUREMENT DATAPROJECT/LOCATIONPROJECTNO. 27307, 00 f INSTRUMENT MANUFACTURER & MODEL S/cfe i fnfk/- 6>, , "*" S~/f 3DATE(S) ll-3~?2. I/-?-?2 11-16-92.1 INSTRUMENT NO.( /,v,/J /YJ7? | CALIBRATION DATEMEASURED BY filar (,& ?ecAiwi TIDAL INFLUENCE O YES D3"NOWEATHER CONDITIONS $-e«

WELL ORPIEZOMETER

NO.DATE/TIME

REFERENCEPOINT

ELEVATION(FT.)

WATER LEVELMEASUREMENT

(FT.)

ADJUSTEDMEASUREMENT

(FT.)

GROUNDWATERELEVATION

(FT.)

I/- 3- £2 53 27 CT»C)-2/0 5-2 7

/A l^ - 2. / /

122$; \

- 2-05" $27.30//I ix -Z02 , 70

MIA/-20 G f/~?-?2 II 10 5 ,27 92K.07-/V. 3 (7»ci- /7,

//-?-?<?, (2/7 - 5; /

^ 6' fee)

l/oo 5-2 7,5-72 7 2 7

ftw -

GENERAL REMARKS.11-3-72 hfyh yjctks- .recggJiVv (/?Q-^OO. cfj i\

AR300920 SHEET NO. J__ OF xl

Page 163: Documentin

;*=*=*,23 Gunnel»— «. FNGINEERS /

tt FlemingkND PLANNERS

GROUNDWATER LEVEL MEASUREMENT DATAPROJECT/LOCATION Jc,c '<r CAU? 'f £j/t_TPROJECTNO. 27307,001 \ INSTRUMENT MANUFACTURER & MODEL Shfk. Txvs/Wcv <^. * S~ 5~3DATE(S) ll-23-y-Z INSTRUMENT NO. /Y37? CALIBRATION DATEMEASURED BY dknAvf/Rf Df<w f A* //<*«?>, TIDAL INFLUENCE a YES ta'NOWEATHER CONDITIONS 5\<rt«'/ «.' .'/c/ , (v y i U "fLi cfeK e oA« . wo'k/- H?c - f5$-/f2 c T

WELL ORPIEZOMETER

NO.

/>iu/-2ff£Al(A/-2/0/VllAX-x?//'

/n 1 - 09^K/-?or/v\(v -202.

i

DATE/TIME

(f_2j-?2 «-/r(/-23-"72 /5^2

11-23^2 155 JM-Z3-f^ /_^Vtf-?.)~7> fe/of/-27~^a jyfo

REFERENCEPOINT

ELEVATION(FT.)

934,27/,W2, 792 . 05~ .YO5-3£,?£>

WATER LEVELMEASUREMENT

(FT.)

-V./g'&oc)-12,7' (ro )-/^3'6Vc)

-^s'Cr^c)-/U'C/^c]-^ ' (7 c)

^ADJUSTED

MEASUREMENT(FT.)

\ /

\ /

VA/ \1 \\

GROUNDWATERELEVATION

(FT.)

£30,0?

528. 6Y5Z6.3-7

22,00*z?jo£~3(.7C

GENERAL REMARKS.

SHEET NO. OF J=_

Page 164: Documentin

A-4

Jack's Creek Flow Measurements

AR300922

Page 165: Documentin

Gauge Nat

-—GaigeNo.2

- - - - - - - - - -—— ------ ... ———— - .:.:-:-:-

gauge eaauredix-. r-srii-ii.- !--- . . = =i,i( -<-. - T-CiiSlliA ^------ _-.-i^._^ "«•-:-=- -=":-- isij:jiilX-1-1 -.1"-:" i*:.":-..._Uj± . i&&£3.l;£>& j&i""" - -== - =i;x " . = . = _- . i- " .-.. - --- -, --I--;-- -I ; rflr . ri jassA:; .-... -j;;. :.-

^ ^ ——— .- . tarft. ^ ^ .MS - Mi PS t WtS* ^

.

Readrta^- Row

__ _

r i iSH -r:;

fi pi:;;:; :? ^ ^ i r ^ i ^

7/08/91T/1OT1

. . ------- _: I> I.; - - : J' : =- -=1- - ~ -

'"_'- '±r rft : ?1:: --- > ':'- •-'--- ' . : " . . . .' :ri=?=i—J:?""iili-J^W'i /.'-•--•=-- ^ - . "•_-'" 1! "- ':

^ v : - ;: f i - K - f ^ f f t :

:. i= -,-,- :=.-. -, . ---~-.L- ~.

- -~ - :r -- v- -" .-. -. . .

Page 166: Documentin

UU4

reek FUw CaJcuJafions

Velocity MeasurementsDistance Velocity

(R) (TtffieC)10425.0

Depth - Area Measurements

Incremental ; VTetalDistance Depth A»a *rea

0,80 ' (US fc w US Wr ; . ;:-gO 045 I- W : t48|>s NsH: »:fid 0.72 246 . 1 t43 -;% v -

12.0 045 246164 045 2.70184 040 243 _ ^

14.0 0.3S274 040804 0.90

-J H.H - " " ~ - ^h^ At*.834 045 1-73 20490.00 OJO

. -:FtowCalcdafiwis -

W0-18 114t ? 14918-*37 848 ^?! r>**

. - T - -. ~WEF, --::vf

r

c-i'=nnc t: flR30092U

Page 167: Documentin

Jack's CreekDate: 6/19/91-6/21/91Stair Gauge No.

Incremental TotalDistance Depth (ft) Area(tT2) Area(fr2)

4.5 0.45 1.01 1.019 2.00 5.51 6.53

17.4 0.37 9.95 16.4830.7 0.00 2.46 18.94

aaSsttSffiagStaff Gauge No. Staff Gauge ReadingTagSsgr Sr-no

Incremental r TottSr* '••*<**«>•<••"Distance. Depth (ft) -Area(fT2) Area(fT2)____J£^__wa^S-SLBr-__„ J7.00 __7.00•W.MA........ _ *«*«.**.*.......,, x MfM, —...X-"*«w*w*«v*,,-«..,....', **—,-r-nrn jjjj....—.—,..t*C •*«»x••B* _ •!:?ly;*?y::1,|K.)..<4.

Steff Gauge No. Staff Gauge Reading3 1.30

Incremental . TotalDistance Depth (ft) Area(fT2) Area t*2)

10.5 0.34 5J37 3.57

AR300925

Page 168: Documentin

Jack's CreekDate: 6/24/91

KS& ^ SS ^ SSsS SS ^ ^ i ^ ^ naax4o. Staff Gauge Reading0.20iSSffiKSsSSSSSSSSSsM

Incremental TotalDepth (ft) Area(fT2) Area(fT2)

0.50 0.7S 0.750.50 1.50 250.50 1.50 3.750.70 1.80 5.550.48 1.77 7.320.30 1.17 8.490.15 0.67 9.170.26 0.62 9.780.12 0.57 10.350.00 0.22 10.57

a jsSS Ssa « SSs«?SStaff Gauge Reading

1.10si is i ^ tS ^ ^ s ^ ^ ^ y ^ K E;

Incremental TotalDistance Depth (ft) Area(fT2) Area(ft*2)

3.0 0.75 1.18 1.139.0 0.70 4.35 5.4812.0 0.60 1.95 7.4313-0 0.00 0.30 7.73

Staff Gauge No. Staff Gauge Reading_^ __^ _ __ 1IncrementaJ Total

Distance Depth (ft) Area(ft*2) Area(fT2)3.0 0.22 0.33 0.336.0 0.35 0.86 1.199.0 0.30 0.98 2.1612.0 0.38 1.02 3.1815.0 0.10 0.72 3.9016.1 0.00 0.06 3.96

AR30Q926

Page 169: Documentin

Jack's CreekDate: 7/1/91

stK?*T»i»«s r;r s«w K**w£ ™*SaugeKo. Staff Gauge Readingi 0.20«SS»SSS8SSaS»S?S5Srs ^

Incremental TotalDistance Depth (ft) An3a(fr2) Area(ft*2)

3.0 0.50 0.75 0.756.0 0.45 1.43 2.189.0 0.45 1.35 3.5312.0 0.60 1.58 5.1015.6 0.45 1.58 6.6818.0 0.35 1.20 7.8821.0 0.15 0.75 8.63 ;24.0 0.25 0.60 9.2327.0 0.50 1.13 10.3528,9 0.00 0.47 10.83

Staff Gauge No. ' Staff Gauge Reading2 1.10

incremental TotalDistance Depth (ft) Area(ft*2) Area(fT2)

3.0 0.50 0.75 .0.759.0 0.50 3.00 3.7512.0 0.75 1.88 5.6313.0 0.60 0.68 6.3015.0 0.50 1.10 7.4016.6 0.00 0.40 7.80

Staff Gauge No. Staff Gauge Reading3 1.32

ssEBSS sssaszssssass ^Incremental Total

Distance Depth (fQ Area(ft*2) Area(fT2)3.0 00 0.30 0.306.0 0.35 0.83 1.139.0 0.45 1.20 2.3312,0 0.30 1.13 3.4515.0 0.25 0.83 . 4.2818.0 0.20 0.68 4.9520.0 0.00 0.20 5.15

AR300927

Page 170: Documentin

Jack's CreekDate: 7/8/91

Gauge No. Staff Gauge Reading1 0.22

Incremental TotalDistance Depth (ft) Area(ft*2) Area(ft*2)

3.0 " 6:50 0.75 0.756.0 0.49 1.49 2.249.0 0.42 1.37 3.6012.0 045 1,46 5.0615.0 0.51 1.59 6.6518.6 0.22 1.10" 7.74.21.0 0.23 0.68 8.4224.0 0.22 0.68 9.0931.0 0.00 0.77 9.86

Staff Gauge No. Staff Gauge Reading2 1.30

Incremental TotalDistance. Depth (ft) Area(ft*2) Area{ft*2J

3.0 0.60 0.90 0.906.0 0.32 1.38 £287.0 0.00 0.16 2.44

0.0 0.40 0.00 0.003.0 0.45 1-28 1.286.0 0.40 1.28 . 2.55

Staff Gauge No. Staff Gauge Reading3 1.40

Distance3.0.6.09.012.015.016.0

^300928

Page 171: Documentin

Jack's CreekDate: 7/15/91

0.16Incremental Total

Distance Depth (ft) Area(fT2) Area(ft*2)3.0 0.50 0.75 0.756.0 0.45 1.43 2.189.0 0.50 1.43 3.60

12.0 0.50 1.50 5.10Q2S 1.13 6.23

18.0 0.15 0.6015.0 Q . 6.8321.0 0.20 0.53 7.35

0.00 0.76 8.11Staff Gauge ReadingStaff Gauge No,2 liOS

t ^ i ^ S Si ^ ^ ^ ilSs ^ ^ ^ Sia liincremental Total

Distance Depth (ft) Area(fT2) Area(ft*2)3.0 0.40 0.60 0.60

1-58 2,186.0 0.659.0 0.68 2.00 4.171U 0.68 2.04 6 1150 0.40 I-* 7*17.6- __0.00

"S iff Gauge Nom< 'Y*y ^ ti»>iik<i <S .'» W?'")*

'staff Gauge Reading1.27

J -gss* ^—— Incremental TOtai

W-» A V4

6.0 0.28 0.71

£ 52 «150 0.30 1-06

ss ^ - -

AR300929

Page 172: Documentin

Jack's CreekDate: 8/20/91^ aa ^ 5 ^ S SSS£ «S ^ sStaff Gauge No. Staff Gauge Reading

1 0.54Staff Gauge No. Staff Gauge Reading

2 1.54S®BSSSS ®S58SS5SBS S«3 «S SSSS S ^ gs® S gSStaff Gauge No. Staff Gauge Reading

3 1.7Sincremental Total

Distance Depth (ft) Area(fT2) Area(fT2)3.0 0.30 Oi45 0.456.0 0.65 1.43 1.889.0 0.72 2.06 3.9312.0 0.85 2.36 6915.0 0.95 2.70 8.9918.0 0.80 2.63 11.6121.0 0.45 1.88 13.4924.0 0.35 1.20 14.6827.0 0.60 1.43 16.1130.0 0.90 2,25 18.3633.0 0.25 1.73 20.0937.0 0.00 0.50 20.59

^300930

Page 173: Documentin

Flow CalculationDate: 11/2/92Station: 1 - Jack's Creek Flow Flow Flow

(cfs per (cfs per (cfs perDistance Depth Depth Area Velocity Velocity Velocity incremental incremental incremental

(ft) (in) (ft) (ftA2) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) width) width) width)0.5 0.0 0.001.0 6.0 0.50 0.31 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.01.8 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.02.9 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.03.0 5.3 0.44 0.13 0.8 0.7 1.0 0.1 0.1 0.13.5 6.0 0.50 0.25 1.3 1.4 1.4 0.3 0.4 0.44.0 6.5 0.54 0.27 1.3 1.4 1.4 0.4 0.4 0.44.5 6.5 0.54 0.27 1.4 1.4 1.4 0.4 0.4 0.45.0 7.0 0.58 0.29 1.4 1.3 1.4 0.4 0.4 0.45.5 7.0 0.58 0.29 1.4 1.4 1.4 0.4 0.4 0.46.0 6.0 0.50 0.25 1.6 1.4 1.5 0.4 0.4 0.46.5 5.0 0.42 0.21 1.3 1.2 1.2 0.3 0.3 0.37.0 6.0 0.50 0.25 1.4 1.4 1.4 0.4 0.4 0.47.5 6.0 0.50 0.25 1.3 1.4 1.3 0.3 0.4 0.38.0 6.0 0.50 0.25 1.3 1.1 1.3 0.3 0.3 0.38.5 5.5 0.46 0.23 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.19.0* 3.0 0.25 0.09 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.09.3 0.0 0.00

Flow= 3.8 3.7 3.7 cfsAvg. Flow = 3.7 cfs

AR30093I

Page 174: Documentin

Flow CalculationDate: 11/2/92Station: 2 - Jack's Creek Flow Flow Flow

(cfs per (cfs per (cfs perDistance Depth Depth Area Velocity Velocity Velocity incremental incremental incremental

(ft) (in) (ft) (ftA2) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) width) width) width)2.8 0.0 0.003.0 1.5 0.13 0.08 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.04.0 3.0 0.25 0.25 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.05.0 3.5 0.29 0.29 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.16.0 4.0 0.33 0.33 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.27.0 4.0 0.33 0.33 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.28.0 4.0 0.33 0.33 0.5 0.7 0.8 0.2 0.2 0.39.0 3.0 0.25 0.25 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.110.0 5.0 0.42 0.42 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.3 0.4 0.411.0 6.5 0.54 0.54 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.312.0 6.5 0.54 0.54 0.7 0.9 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.313.0 7.0 0.58 0.58 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.514.0 6.0 0.50 0.50 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.4 0.4 0.415.0 6.3 0.52 0.52 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.416.0 6.0 0.50 0.50 0.9 0.6 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.417.p 6.0 0.50 0.50 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.318.0 5.0 0.42 0.42 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.3 0.3 0.319.0 5.0 6.42 0.42 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.220.0 5.0 0.42 0.42 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.221.0 3.8 0.31 0.31 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.122.0 3.0 0.25 0.19 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.022.5 0.0 0.00

Flow= 3.9 4.2 4.0 cfsAvg. Flow = 4.1 cfs

3R300932

Page 175: Documentin

Flow CalculationDate: 11/2/92Station: 3 - Jack's Creek Flow Flow Flow

(cfs per (cfs per (cfs perDistance Depth Depth Area Velocity Velocity Velocity incremental incremental incremental

(ft) (in) (ft) (ftA2) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) width) width) width)0.0 0.0 0.001.0 7.8 0.65 0.65 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.02.0 14.0 1.17 1.17 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.03.0 15.0 1.25 1.25 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.04.0 15.3 1.27 1.27 0.5 0.8 0.5 0.6 1.0 0.65.0 15.0 1.25 1.25 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.46.0 12.0 1.00 1.00 0.6 0.6 0.9 0.6 0.6 0.97.0 13.0 1.08 1.08 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.68.0 10.0 0.83 0.83 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.39.0 11.0 0.92 0.92 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.110.0 9.0 0.75 0.75 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.111.0 9.0 0.75 0.75 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.012.0 7.0 0.58 0.58 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.013.0 7.0 0.58 0.58 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.014.0 5.5 0.46 0.46 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.015.0 4.0 0.33 0.33 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.016.0 2.5 0.21 0.21 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.017.0 0.0 0.00

Flow= 3.1 3.7 4.0 cfsAvg. Flow = 3.6 cfs

Station: A - Jack's Creek Flow Flow Flow(cfs per (cfs per (cfs per

Distance Depth Depth Area Velocity Velocity Velocity incremental incremental incremental(ft) (in) (ft) (ftA2) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) width) width) width)0.0 0.0 0.000.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.00

Flow= 0.0 0.0 0.0 cfsAvg. Flow = 0.0 cfs

Station: B - Jack's Creek Flow Flow Flow(cfs per (cfs per (cfs per

Distance Depth Depth Area Velocity Velocity Velocity incremental incremental incremental(ft) (in) (ft) (ftA2) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) width) width) width)1.0 0.0 0.001.5 1.5 0.13 0.06 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.02.0 2.5 0.21 0.10 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.12.5 2.0 0.17 0.08 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.03.0 2.0 0.17 0.08 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.03.5 2.0 0.17 0.06 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.03.8 0.0 0.00

Flow= 0.2 0.2 0.1 cfsAvg. Flow = 0,2 cfs

AR300933

Page 176: Documentin

Flow CalculationDate: 11/2/92Station: C - Jack's Creek Flow Flow Flow

(cfs per (cfs per (cfs perDistance Depth Depth Area Velocity Velocity Velocity incremental incremental incremental

(ft) (in) (ft) (ftA2) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) width) width) width)0.0 0.0 0.000.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.00

Flow= 0.0 0.0 0.0 cfsAvg. Flow = 0.0 cfs

Station: D - Jack's Creek Flow Flow Flow(cfs per (cfs per (cfs per

Distance Depth Depth Area Velocity Velocity Velocity incremental incremental incremental(ft) (in) (ft) (ftA2) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) width) width) width)0.6 0.0 0.001.0 3.0 0.25 0.11 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.01.5 3.5 0.29 0.15 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.02.0 3.0 0.25 0.13 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.02.5 2.5 0.21 0.10 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.03.0 2.5 0.21 0.10 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.03.5 2.5 0.21 0.10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.04.0 2.5 0.21 0.10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.04.5 0.0 0.00

Flow= 0.1 0.1 0.1 cfsAvg. Flow= 0.1 cfs

Page 177: Documentin

Flow CalculationDate: 11/3/92Station: 1 - Jack's Creek Flow Flow Flow

(cfs per (cfs per (cfs perDistance Depth Depth Area Velocity Velocity Velocity incremental incremental incremental

(ft) (in) (ft) (ftA2) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) width) width) width)55.0 0.0 0.0053.0 7.3 0.60 1.21 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.151.0 23.0 1.92 3.83 1.2 1.1 1.3 4.6 4.2 5.049.0 23.5 1.96 3.92 1.8 1.8 1.7 7.1 7.1 6.747.0 16.5 1.38 2.75 2.7 2.7 2.4 7.4 7.4 6.645.0 26.5 2.21 4.42 2.7 2.6 2.7 11.9 11.5 11.943.0 27.0 2.25 4.50 1.9 2.0 2.1 8.5 9.0 9.541.0 29.0 2.42 4.83 1.6 1.9 1.8 7.7 9.2 8.739.0 29.0 2.42 4.83 1.7 1.7 1.5 8.2 8.2 7.337.0 28.0 2.33 4.67 1.6 1.7 2.2 7.5 7.9 10.335.0 27.0 2.25 4.50 2.7 2.5 2.3 12.2 11.3 10.433.0 28.0 2.33 4.67 1.9 1.9 1.6 8.9 8.9 7.531.0 27.0 2.25 4.50 1.9 2.5 2.9 8.5 11.3 13.0

. 29.0 28.0 2.33 4.67 2.7 2.6 2.5 12.6 12.1 11.727.0 26.5 2.21 4.42 2.2 2.1 2.0 9.7 9.3 8.825.0; 29.0 2.42 4.83 2.2 2.4 2.4 10.6 11.6 11.623.0 29.0 2.42 4.83 2.5 2.8 2.8 12.1 13.5 13.521.0 25.0 2.08 4.17 2.3 2.5 2.7 9.6 10.4 11.319.0 27.0 2.25 4.50 2.4 2.7 2.9 10.8 12.2 13.017.0 27.0 2.25 4.50 2.0 2.2 2.0 9.0 9.9 9.015.0 26.5 2.21 4.42 0.7 0.8 0.6 3.1 3.5 2.713.0 23.5 1.96 3.92 0.6 0.5 0.5 2.3 2.0 2.011.0 22.0 1.83 3.67 1.1 1.3 1.2 4.0 4.8 4.49.0 21.0 1.75 3.50 1.2 1.2 1.1 4.2 4.2 3.97.0 21.0 1.75 3.50 1.0 1.1 0.9 3.5 3.9 3.25.0 21.0 1.75 3.50 0.5 0.4 0.4 1.8 1.4 1.43.0 13.0 1.08 2.17 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.01.0 0.0 0.00

Flow=* 186.2 195.2 193.2 cfsAvg. Flow = 191.5 cfs

AR300935

Page 178: Documentin

Flow CalculationDate: 11/3/92Station: 2 - Jack's Creek Flow Flow Flow

(cfs per (cfs per (cfs perDistance Depth Depth Area Velocity Velocity Velocity incremental incremental incremental

(ft) (in) (ft) (ftA2) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) width) width) width)47.0 2.5 0.2145.0 10.0 0.83 1.67 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.743.0 13.0 1.08 2.17 0.6 0.7 0.7 1.3 1.5 1.541.0 16.0 1.33 2.67 1.7 1.9 1.6 4.5 5.1 4.339.0 16.5 1.38 2.75 1.9 2.0 2.1 5.2 5.5 5.837.0 17.5 1.46 2.92 2.4 2.0 2.3 7.0 5.8 6.735.0 18.5 1.54 3.08 2.5 2.3 2.5 7.7 7.1 7.733.0 21.0 1.75 3.50 2.4 2.6 2.5 8.4 9.1 8.831.0 21.0 1.75 3.50 2.5 2.3 2.6 8.8 8.0 9.129.0 22.0 1.83 3.67 2.7 2.6 2.7 9.9 9.5 9.927.0 22.0 1.83 3.67 2.2 2.6 2.4 8.1 9.5 8.825.0 23.0 1.92 3.83 3.0 2.8 2.6 11.5 10.7 10.023.0 22.0 1.83 3.67 2.5 2.9 2.5 9.2 10.6 9.2

, 21.0 23.5 1.96 3.92 2.0 3.1 2.9 7.8 12.1 11.419.0 22.5 1.88 3.75 3.0 2.8 2.6 11.3 10.5 9.817.p 22.0 1.83 3.67 2.7 2.7 2.8 9.9 9.9 10.315.0 21.0 1.75 3.50 2.6 2.5 2.6 9.1 8.8 9.113.0 19.0 1.58 3.17 2.6 2.9 2.7 8.2 9.2 8.611.0 17.0 1.42 2.83 2.2 2.6 3.0 6.2 7.4 8.59.0 16.0 1.33 2.67 2.6 2.8 2.9 6.9 7.5 7.77.0 16.0 1.33 2.67 2.8 2.6 2.7 7.5 6.9 7.25.0 7.0 0.58 1.17 2.6 2.6 2.6 3.0 3.0 3.03.0 5.0 0.42 0.63 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.22.0 0.0 0.00

Flow= 119.6 123.9 122.1 cfsAvg. Flow = 121.9 cfs

3R300936

Page 179: Documentin

Flow CalculationDate: 11/3/92Station: 3 - Jack's Creek ' Flow Flow Flow

(cfs per (cfs per (cfs perDistance Depth Depth Area Velocity Velocity Velocity incremental incremental incremental

(ft) (in) (ft) (ftA2) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) width) width) width)0.8 14.0 1.172.0 20.0 1.67 2.64 1.2 1.7 1.8 3.2 4.5 4.84.0 24.0 2.00 4.00 4.8 4.7 4.7 19.2 18.8 18.86.0 22.0 1.83 3.67 4.4 4.6 4.2 16.1 16.9 15.48.0 19.0 1.58 3.17 2.7 2.9 3.1 8.6 9.2 9.8

10.0 19.0 1.58 3.17 3.4 3.5 3.5 10.8 11.1 11.112.0 17.0 1.42 2.83 3.7 3.6 3.7 10.5 10.2 10.514.0 15.0 1.25 2.50 3.1 3.1 2.8 7.8 7.8 6.916.0 13.0 1.08 2.17 3.6 3.5 3.6 7.8 7.6 7.818.0 11.0 0.92 1.83 . 3.6 3.7 3.5 6.6 6.8 6.420.0 7.0 0.58 1.17 3.3 3.4 3.2 3.9 4.0 3.722.0 7.0 0.58 1.17 3.5 3.5 3.6 4.1 4.1 4.224.0 5.0 0.42 0.83 2.7 3.1 3.1 2.3 2.6 2.626.0 5.0 0.42 0.83 2.2 2.1 2.4 1.8 1.8 2.028.0 4.0 0.33 0.67 2.3 2.2 2.4 1.5 1.5 1.630.0, 1.5 0.13 0.25 1.1 1.2 1.2 0.3 0.3 0.332.0 0.0 0.00

Flow= 104.3 106.9 105.9 cfsAvg. Flow = 105.7 cfs

Station: A - Jack's Creek Flow Flow Flow(cfs per (cfs per (cfs per

Distance Depth Depth Area Velocity Velocity Velocity incremental incremental incremental(ft) (in) (ft) (ft*2) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) width) width) width)0.0 0.0 0.000.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.00

Flow= 0.0 0.0 0.0 cfsAvg. Flow = 0.0 cfs

Station: B - Jack's Creek Flow Flow Flow(cfs per (cfs per (cfs per

Distance Depth Depth Area Velocity Velocity Velocity incremental incremental incremental(ft) (in) (ft) (ftA2) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) width) width) width)0.8 0.0 0.001.3 4.3 0.35 0.18 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.11.8 6.5 0.54 0.27 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.22.3 6.5 0.54 0.27 1.0 0.8 0.9 0.3 0.2 0.22.8 6.0 0.50 0.25 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.22.3 5.0 0.42 0.42 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.13.8 4.5 0.38 0.38 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.04.3 2.0 0.17 0.06 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.04.4 0.0 0.00

Flow= 0.9 0.7 0.8 cfsAvg. Flow = 0.8 cfs

flR300937

Page 180: Documentin

Flow CalculationDate: 11/3/92Station: Cl - Jack's Creek Flow Flow Flow

(cfs per (cfs per (cfs perDistance Depth Depth Area Velocity Velocity Velocity incremental incremental incremental

(ft) (in) (ft) (ft*2) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) width) width) width)0.4 0.0 0.000.9 3.0 0.25 0.13 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.01.4 5.0 0.42 0.21 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.11.9 4.0 0.33 0.17 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.02.4 4.0 0.33 0.17 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.02.9 3.0 0.25 0.13 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.03.4 1.0 0.08 0.04 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.03.9 1.5 0.13 0.06 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.04.4 0.0 0.00

Flow= 0.2 0.1 0.2 cfsAvg. Flow = 0.2 cfs

Station: C2 - Jack's Creek Flow Flow Flow(cfs per (cfs per (cfs per

Distance Depth Depth Area Velocity Velocity Velocity incremental incremental incremental(ft) , (in) (ft) (ftA2) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) width) width) width)0.7 0.0 0.001.2 2.0 0.17 0.08 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.01.7 1.5 0.13 0.06 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.02.2 4.0 0.33 0.17 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.02.7 4.5 0.38 0.22 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.03.3 0.0 0.00

Flow= 0.1 0.1 0.1 cfsAvg. Flow = 0.1 cfs

Station: D - Jack's Creek Flow Flow Flow(cfs per (cfs per (cfs per

Distance Depth Depth Area Velocity Velocity Velocity incremental incremental incremental(ft) (in) (ft) (ftA2) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) width) width) width)1.0 0.0 0.001.5 3.0 0.25 0.13 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.12.0 3.5 0.29 0.15 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.1 0.1 0.12.5 3.0 0.25 0.13 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.13.0 2.5 0.21 0.10 0.8 0.9 0.7 0.1 0.1 0.13.5 2.5 0.21 0.10 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.14.0 0.0 0.00

Flow= 0.4 0.4 0.4 cfsAvg. Flow = 0.4 cfs

AR300938

Page 181: Documentin

Flow CalculationDate: 11/9/92Station: 1 - Jack's Creek Flow Flow Flow

(cfs per (cfs per (cfs perDistance Depth Depth Area Velocity Velocity Velocity incremental incremental incremental

(ft) (in) (ft) (ftA2) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) width) width) width)0.0 0.0 0.001.0 5.8 0.48 0.48 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.12.0 6.8 0.56 0.56 0.9 0.8 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.23.0 6.0 0.50 0.50 1.8 1.9 1.9 0.9 1.0 1.04.0 6.0 0.50 0.50 1.9 1.9 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.05.0 6.0 0.50 0.50 1.7 1.7 1.7 0.9 0.9 0.96.0 6.5 0.54 0.54 1.6 1.9 1.6 0.9 1.0 0.97.0 5.0 0.42 0.42 1.6 1.7 1.6 0.7 0.7 0.78.0 3.0 0.25 0.25 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.09.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

13.7 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.014.0 2.0 0.17 0.11 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.015.0 3.0 0.25 0.25 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.016.0 3.0 0.25 0.25 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.117.0 2.5 0.21 0.21 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.118.0; 2.0 0.17 0.14 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.018.7 0.0 0.00

Flow = 5.0 5.2 4.8 cfsAvg. Flow = 5.0 cfs

AR300939

Page 182: Documentin

Flow CalculationDate: 11/9/92Station: 2 - Jack's Creek Flow Flow Flow

(cfs per (cfs per (cfs perDistance Depth Depth Area Velocity Velocity Velocity incremental incremental incremental

(ft) (in) (ft) (ftA2) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) width) width) width)31.5 0.0 0.0031.0 2.0 0.17 0.13 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.030.0 4.0 0.33 0.33 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.229.0 3.3 0.27 0.27 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.228.0 3.0 0.25 0.25 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.2 0.2 0.227.0 4.0 0.33 0.33 0.7 0.7 0.9 0.2 0.2 0.326.0 4.0 0.33 0.33 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.3 0.3 0.325.0 5.0 0.42 0.42 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.4 0.4 0.324.0 5.0 0.42 0.42 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.4 0.4 0.423.0 5.0 0.42 0.42 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.222.0 7.0 0.58 0.58 1.2 1.1 1.1 0.7 0.6 0.621.0 5.5 0.46 0.46 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.520.0 5.0 0.42 0.42 0.9 0.7 0.8 0.4 0.3 0.319.0 4.0 0.33 0.33 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.3 0.3 0.318.0 3.5 0.29 0.29 0.7 0.4 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.217.JJ 4.5 0.38 0.38 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.4 0.4 0.316.0 3.0 0.25 0.25 1.1 1.1 0.9 0.3 0.3 0.215.0 2.5 0.21 0.21 0.7 0.8 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.114.0 2.5 0.21 0.21 0.7 0.2 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.113.0 2.5 0.21 0.21 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.112.0 0.0 0.00

Flow= 5.1 4.8 4.8 cfsAvg. Flow = 4.9 cfs

Page 183: Documentin

Flow CalculationDate: 11/9/92Station: 3 - Jack's Creek Flow Flow Flow

(cfs per (cfs per (cfs perDistance Depth Depth Area Velocity Velocity Velocity incremental incremental incremental

(ft) (in) (ft) (ftA2) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) width) width) width)0.5 0.0 0.001.0 2.3 0.19 0.14 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.02.0 9.0 0.75 0.75 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.03.0 11.0 0.92 0.92 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.24.0 13.5 1.13 1.13 1.1 1.1 0.9 1.2 1.2 1.05.0 13.0 1.08 1.08 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.16.0 11.5 0.96 0.96 0.9 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.0 0.97.0 11.5 0.96 0.96 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.78.0 9.0 0.75 0.75 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.49.0 9.0 0.75 0.75 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.210.0 9.0 0.75 0.75 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.211.0 7.0 0.58 0.58 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.112.0 6.5 0.54 0.54 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.013.0 5.0 0.42 0.42 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.014.0 4.0 0.33 0.33 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.015.0; 3.0 0.25 0.25 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.016.0 2.0 0.17 0.17 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.017.0 0.0 0.00

Flow= 4.9 5.1 4.6 cfsAvg. Flow = 4.9 cfs

Station: A - Jack's Creek Flow Flow Flow(cfs per (cfs per (cfs per

Distance Depth Depth Area Velocity Velocity Velocity incremental incremental incremental(ft) (in) (ft) (ftA2) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) width) width) width)0.0 0.0 0.000.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.00

Flow= 0.0 0.0 0.0 cfsAvg. Flow = 0.0 cfs

AR3009M

Page 184: Documentin

Flow CalculationDate: 11/9/92Station: B - Jack's Creek Flow Flow Flow

(cfs per (cfs per (cfs perDistance Depth Depth Area Velocity Velocity Velocity incremental incremental incremental

(ft) (in) (ft) (ftA2) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) width) width) width)0.7 0.0 0.001.2 1.0 0.08 0.04 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.01.7 3.0 0.25 0.12 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.02.2 4.0 0.33 0.17 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.02.7 4.0 0.33 0.17 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.03.2 2.5 0.21 0.11 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.03.8 1.5 0.13 0.06 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.04.2 0.0 0.00

Flow= 0.1 0.1 0.1 cfsAvg. Flow = 0.1 cfs

Station: C - Jack's Creek Flow Flow Flow(cfs per (cfs per (cfs per

Distance Depth Depth Area Velocity Velocity Velocity incremental incremental incremental(ft) (in) (ft) (ftA2) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) width) width) width)0.0 0.0 0.000.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.00

Flow= 0.0 0.0 0.0 cfsAvg. Flow = 0.0 cfs

Station: D - Jack's Creek Flow Flow Flow(cfs per (cfs per (cfs per

Distance Depth Depth Area Velocity Velocity Velocity incremental incremental incremental(ft) (in) (ft) (ftA2) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) width) width) width)1.0 0.0 0.001.5 1.0 0.08 0.04 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.02.0 1.0 0.08 0.04 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.02.5 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.03.0 0.0 0.00

Flow= 0.0 0.0 0.0 cfsAvg. Flow = 0.01 cfs

Page 185: Documentin

Flow CalculationDate: 11/16/92Station: 1 - Jack's Creek Flow Flow Flow

(cfs per (cfs per (cfs perDistance Depth Depth Area Velocity Velocity Velocity incremental incremental incremental

(ft) (in) (ft) (ftA2) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) width) width) width)36.8 0.0 0.0036.0 6.0 0.50 0.46 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.035.0 8.0 0.67 0.67 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.134.0 7.5 0.63 0.63 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.133.0 9.0 0.75 0.75 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.532.0 8.5 0.71 0.71 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.6 0.6 0.631.0 8.0 0.67 0.67 0.6 0.8 0.7 0.4 0.5 0.530.0 7.5 0.63 0.63 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.529.0 6.5 0.54 0.54 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.4 0.4 0.428.0 7.0 0.58 0.58 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.5 0.5 0.527.0 7.0 0.58 0.58 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.5 0.5 0.526.0 7.0 0.58 0.58 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.4 0.5 0.525.0 6.0 0.50 0.50 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.4 0.4 0.424.0 9.0 0.75 0.75 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.523.0 6.0 0.50 0.50 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.322.0 10.0 0.83 0.83 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.521.0f 10.5 0.88 0.88 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.520.0 9.5 0.79 0.79 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.519.0 9.5 0.79 0.79 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.618.0 11.0 0.92 0.92 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.6 0.617.0 8.0 0.67 0.67 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.516.0 9.0 0.75 0.75 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.515.0 8.0 0.67 0.67 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.514.0 10.0 0.83 0.83 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.613.0 10.0 0.83 0.83 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.312.0 9.0 0.75 0.75 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.311.0 10.0 0.83 0.83 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.510.0 11.0 0.92 0.92 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.59.0 9.0 0.75 0.75 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.58.0 10.0 0.83 0.83 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.77.0 11.0 0.92 0.92 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0-7 0.66.0 11.0 0.92 0.92 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.65.0 10.0 0.83 0.83 0.9 0.9 1.1 0.8 0.8 0.94.0 9.0 0.75 0.75 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.53.0 8.5 0.71 0.71 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.42.0 8.0 0.67 0.67 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.01.0 6.0 0.50 0.29 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.8 0.0 0.00

Flow= 10.2 10.7 10.8 cfsAvg. Flow = 10.6 cfs

Page 186: Documentin

Flow CalculationDate: 11/16/92Station: 2 - Jack's Creek Flow Flow Flow

(cfs per (cfs per (cfs perDistance Depth Depth Area Velocity Velocity Velocity incremental incremental incremental

(ft) (in) (ft) (ftA2) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) width) width) width)9.5 0.0 0.0010.0 3.0 0.25 0.19 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.011.0 4.5 0.38 0.38 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.012.0 4.0 0.33 0.33 1.0 0.9 1.2 0.3 0.3 0.413.0 5.0 0.42 0.42 1.4 1.0 1.3 0.6 0.4 0.514.0 5.5 0.46 0.46 1.2 1.1 1.1 0.5 0.5 0.515.0 6.5 0.54 0.54 1.1 1.1 1.2 0.6 0.6 0.616.0 6.5 0.54 0.54 1.4 1.9 1.8 0.8 1.0 1.017.0 7.0 0.58 0.58 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.0 1.1 1.118.0 7.0 0.58 0.58 1.7 1.4 1.4 1.0 0.8 0.819.0 7.0 0.58 0.58 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.0 1.1 1.120.0 7.0 0.58 0.58 1.6 1.6 1.7 0.9 0.9 1.021.0 9.0 0.75 0.75 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.2 1.2 1.322.0 9.0 0.75 0.75 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.3 1.3 1.423.0 9.0 0.75 0.75 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.2 1.1 1.224.p 8.0 0.67 0.67 1.4 1.5 1.3 0.9 1.0 0.925.0 8.0 0.67 0.67 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.1 1.2 1.226.0 7.0 0.58 0.58 1.6 1.5 1.6 0.9 0.9 0.927.0 6.0 0.50 0.50 1.6 1.7 1.7 0.8 0.9 0.928.0 7.0 0.58 0.58 1.4 1.4 1.5 0.8 0.8 0.929.0 6.0 0.50 0.50 1.2 1.3 1.4 0.6 0.7 0.730.0 5.0 0.42 0.42 1.3 1.3 1.4 0.5 0.5 0.631.0 3.5 0.29 0.29 1.2 1.0 0.9 0.4 0.3 0.332.0 5.0 0.42 0.42 0.9 1.1 1.2 0.4 0.5 0.533.0 2.5 0.21 0.16 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.133.5 0.0 0.00

Flow= 15.1 15.1 15.7 cfsAvg. Flow = 15.3 cfs

AR3009H I

Page 187: Documentin

Flow CalculationDate: 11/16/92Station: 3 - Jack's Creek Flow Flow Flow

(cfs per (cfs per (cfs perDistance Depth Depth Area Velocity Velocity Velocity incremental incremental incremental

(ft) (in) (ft) (ftA2) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) width) width) width)0.7 0.0 0.001.0 5.0 0.42 0.28 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.02.0 13.0 1.08 1.08 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.03.0 15.0 1.25 0.94 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.73.5 15.0 1.25 0.63 1.5 2.0 1.9 0.9 1.3 1.24.0 15.5 1.29 0.65 2.9 2.8 2.9 1.9 1.8 1.94.5 15.5 1.29 0.65 2.4 2.3 2.4 1.6 1.5 1.65.0 15.0 1.25 0.63 2.1 1.8 2.1 1.3 1.1 1.35.5 15.0 1.25 0.63 2.1 1.9 1.9 1.3 1.2 1.26.0 14.0 1.17 0.58 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.2 1.1 1.16.5 13.5 1.13 0.56 2.0 1.8 1.9 1.1 1.0 1.17.0 13.0 1.08 0.54 2.0 1.7 1.9 1.1 0.9 1.07.5 11.0 0.92 0.46 1.8 1.7 1.9 0.8 0.8 0.9

. 8.0 10.0 0.83 0.42 1.8 1.7 1.5 0.8 0.7 0.68.5 11.5 0.96 0.48 1.6 1.5 1.6 0.8 0.7 0.89.0y 11.0 0.92 0.46 1.3 1.4 1.4 0.6 0.6 0.69.5 11.5 0.96 0.48 1.3 1.2 1.2 0.6 0.6 0.610.0 9.5 0.79 0.59 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.6 0.6 0.611.0 9.0 0.75 0.75 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.512.0 5.0 0.42 0.42 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.213.0 7.0 0.58 0.58 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.214.0 5.0 0.42 0.42 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.015.0 5.0 0.42 0.42 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.016.0 4.0 0.33 0.33 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.017.0 2.0 0.17 0.17 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.018.0 5.0 0.42 0.28 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.018.3 0.0 0.00

Flow= 14.4 13.8 14.5 cfsAvg. Flow = 14.2 cfs

Station: A - Jack's Creek Flow Flow Flow(cfs per (cfs per (cfs per

Distance Depth Depth Area Velocity Velocity Velocity incremental incremental incremental(ft) (in) (ft) (ftA2) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) width) width) width)0.0 0.0 0.000.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.00

Flow= 0.0 0.0 0.0 cfsAvg. Flow = 0.0 cfs

Page 188: Documentin

Flow CalculationDate: 11/16/92Station: B - Jack's Creek Flow Flow Flow

(cfs per (cfs per (cfs perDistance Depth Depth Area Velocity Velocity Velocity incremental incremental incremental

(ft) (in) (ft) (ftA2) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) width) width) width)0.7 0.0 0.001.0 1.5 0.13 0.05 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.01.5 4.0 0.33 0.17 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.02.0 5.0 0.42 0.21 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.12.5 4.0 0.33 0.17 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.03.0 3.0 0.25 0.13 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.03.5 2.0 0.17 0.08 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.04.0 1.0 0.08 0.03 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.04.3 0.0 0.00

Flow= 0.1 0.2 0.2 cfsAvg. Flow = 0.1 cfs

Station: C - Jack's Creek Flow Flow Flow(cfs per (cfs per (cfs per

Distance Depth Depth Area Velocity Velocity Velocity incremental incremental incremental(ft) (in) (ft) (ftA2) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) width) width) width)0.0 0.0 0.000.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.00

Flow= 0.0 0.0 0.0 cfsAvg. Flow = 0.0 cfs

Station: D - Jack's Creek Flow Flow Flow(cfs per (cfs per (cfs per

Distance Depth Depth Area Velocity Velocity Velocity incremental incremental incremental(ft) (in) (ft) (ftA2) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) width) width) width)1.0 0.0 0.001.5 1.0 0.08 0.04 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.02.0 1.0 0.08 0.04 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.02.5 1.0 0.08 0.04 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.03.0 1.0 0.08 0.04 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.03.5 0.0 0.00

Flow= 0.0 0.0 0.0 cfsAvg. Flow = 0.03 cfs

Page 189: Documentin

Flow CalculationDate: 11/23/92Station: 1 - Jack's Creek Flow Flow Flow

(cfs per (cfs per (cfs perDistance Depth Depth Area Velocity Velocity Velocity incremental incremental ncremental

(ft) (in) (ft) (ftA2) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) width) width) width)1.0 0.0 0.003.0 15.0 1.25 2.50 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.05.0 17.0 1.42 2.83 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.07.0 18.0 1.50 3.00 1.9 1.8 1.9 5.7 5.4 5.79.0 19.0 1.58 3.17 1.9 1.9 1.9 6.0 6.0 6.011.0 20.0 2.70 5.40 2.5 0.3 0.1 13.5 1.6 0.513.0 20.0 1.67 3.33 3.4 3.5 3.6 11.3 11.7 12.015.0 20.0 1.67 3.33 3.6 3.8 3.6 12.0 12.7 12.017.0 20.5 1.71 3.42 3.4 3.5 3.5 11.6 12.0 12.019.0 20.0 1.67 3.33 3.0 2.9 2.9 10.0 9.7 9.721.0 21.0 1.75 3.50 3.1 3.0 3.2 10.9 10.5 11.223.0 21.0 1.75 3.50 3.0 2.9 2.8 10.5 10.2 9.825.0 21.0 1.75 3.50 2.6 2.8 3.0 9.1 9.8 10.527.0 19.0 1.58 3.17 2.4 2.3 2.4 7.6 7.3 7.629.0 20.0 1.67 3.33 2.6 2.5 2.5 8.7 8.3 8.331.0. 19.0 1.58 3.17 2.4 2.4 2.5 7.6 7.6 7.933.0 20.0 1.67 3.33 2.7 2.8 2.8 9.0 9.3 9.335.0 19.0 1.58 3.17 2.9 3.1 3.0 9.2 9.8 9.537.0 18.0 1.50 3.00 3.1 3.1 3.2 9.3 9.3 9.639.0 6.0 0.50 1.00 2.9 2.9 3.0 2.9 2.9 3.041.0 12.0 1.00 2.00 1.4 1.0 1.4 2.8 2.0 2.843.0 13.0 1.08 2.17 1.0 1.1 1.0 2.2 2.4 2.245.0 15.0 1.25 2.81 2.1 2.1 2.0 5.9 5.9 5.647.5 0.0 0.00

Flow= 165.7 154.3 155.3 cfsAvg. Flow = 158.4 cfs

Page 190: Documentin

Flow CalculationDate: 11/23/92Station: 2 - Jack's Creek Flow Flow Flow

(cfs per (cfs per (cfs perDistance Depth Depth Area Velocity Velocity Velocity incremental incremental ncremental

(ft) (in) (ft) (ftA2) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) width) width) width)1.5 0.0 0.003.0 7.0 0.58 1.02 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.25.0 8.0 0.67 1.33 3.7 3.7 3.7 4.9 4.9 4.97.0 18.0 1.50 3.00 3.2 3.4 3.3 9.6 10.2 9.99.0 18.0 1.50 3.00 3.2 3.2 3.3 9.6 9.6 9.911.0 22.0 1.83 3.67 3.2 3.3 3.2 11.7 12.1 11.713.0 21.0 1.75 3.50 3.4 3.3 3.5 11.9 11.5 12.315.0 22.0 1.83 3.67 3.1 3.1 3.0 11.4 11.4 11.017.0 23.0 1.92 3.83 3.0 3.1 3.0 11.5 11.9 11.519.0 25.0 2.08 4.17 3.0 3.2 3.3 12.5 13.3 13.821.0 25.0 2.08 4.17 3.1 3.0 3.1 12.9 12.5 12.923.0 25.0 2.08 4.17 3.3 3.2 3.0 13.8 13.3 12.525.0 24.0 2.00 4.00 3.1 3.0 3.0 12.4 12.0 12.027.0 23.0 1.92 3.83 2.8 2.5 2.8 10.7 9.6 10.729.0 23.0 1.92 3.83 2.8 2.9 3.0 10.7 11.1 11.531?0 21.0 1.75 3.50 2.7 2.9 2.9 9.5 10.2 10.233".0 20.0 1.67 3.33 2.8 2.9 2.9 9.3 9.7 9.735.0 17.0 1.42 2.83 2.3 2.3 2.3 6.5 6.5 6.537.0 18.0 1.50 3.00 2.6 2.8 2.9 7.8 8.4 8.739.0 17.0 1.42 2.83 2.4 2.5 2.6 6.8 7.1 7.441.0 17.0 1.42 2.83 1.7 1.9 2.0 4.8 5.4 5.743.0 12.0 1.00 2.00 1.2 1.4 1.3 2.4 2.8 2.645.0 9.0 0.75 1.69 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.347.5 0.0 0.00

Flow= 162.5 163.3 164.4 cfsAvg. Flow = 163.4 cfs

Page 191: Documentin

Flow CalculationDate: 11/23/92Station: 3 - Jack's Creek Flow Flow Flow

(cfs per (cfs per (cfs perDistance Depth Depth Area Velocity Velocity Velocity incremental incremental ncremental

(ft) (in) (ft) (ftA2) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) width) width) width)1.0 20.0 1.673.0 26.0 2.17 4.33 4.5 4.7 4.9 19.5 20.4 21.25.0 27.0 2.25 4.50 4.3 4.1 4.2 19.3 18.5 18.97.0 25.0 2.08 4.17 4.2 4.4 4.5 17.5 18.3 18.89.0 24.0 2.00 4.00 4.6 4.5 4.4 18.4 18.0 17.611.0 24.0 2.00 4.00 4.0 4.2 4.1 16.0 16.8 16.413.0 20.0 1.67 3.33 4.2 4.2 4.3 14.0 14.0 14.315.0 19.0 1.58 3.17 3.7 3.7 3.9 11.7 11.7 12.417.0 16.0 1.33 2.67 3.9 4.0 3.9 10.4 10.7 10.419.0 11.0 0.92 1.83 4.1 4.2 4.1 7.5 7.7 7.521.0 11.0 0.92 1.83 4.0 4.1 3.9 7.3 7.5 7.123.0 9.0 0.75 1.50 3.9 4.1 4.0 5.9 6.1 6.025.0 8.0 0.67 1.33 3.2 3.3 3.2 4.3 4.4 4.327.0 8.0 0.67 1.33 3.2 3.4 3.3 4.3 4.5 4.429.0 5.0 0.42 0.83 2.8 3.0 3.1 2.3 2.5 2.6Sl.Oy 4.0 0.33 0.67 1.3 1.2 1.3 0.9 0.8 0.933.0 2.0 0.17 0.33 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.135.0 2.0 0.17 0.33 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.037.0 0.0 0.00

Flow= 159.3 161.9 162.8 cfsAvg. Flow = 161.3 cfs

Station: A - Jack's Creek Flow Flow Flow.-' — .-. (cfs per (cfs per (cfs per

Distance Depth Depth Area Velocity Velocity Velocity incremental incremental ncremental(ft) (in) (ft) (ftA2) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) width) width) width)0.0 0.0 0.000.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.00

Flow= 0.0 0.0 0.0 cfsAvg. Flow = 0.0 cfs

A.R3009«*9

Page 192: Documentin

Flow CalculationDate: 11/23/92Station: B - Jack's Creek Flow Flow Flow

(cfs per (cfs per (cfs perDistance Depth Depth Area Velocity Velocity Velocity incremental incremental ncremental

(ft) (in) (ft) (ftA2) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) width) width) width)0.7 0.0 0.001.0 3.8 0.31 0.13 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.01.5 5.5 0.46 0.23 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.12.0 6.8 0.56 0.28 1.3 1.2 1.3 0.4 0.3 0.42.5 6.5 0.54 0.27 1.0 0.8 0.9 0.3 0.2 0.23.0 5.0 0.42 0.21 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.13.5 4.0 0.33 0.17 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.14.0 3.0 0.25 0.13 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.04.5 1.0 0.08 0.03 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.04.8 0.0 0.00

Flow= 0.9 0.9 1.0 cfsAvg. Flow = 0.9 cfs

Station: Cl - Jack's Creek Flow Flow Flow(cfs per (cfs per (cfs per

Distance Depth Depth Area Velocity Velocity Velocity incremental incremental ncremental(ft)' (in) (ft) (ftA2) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) width) width) width)1.0 0.0 0.001.5 3.5 0.29 0.15 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.02.0 6.0 0.50 0.25 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.12.5 7.0 0.58 0.29 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.13.0 6.0 0.50 0.21 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.03.3 0.0 0.00

Flow= 0.1 0.1 0.2 cfsAvg. Flow = 0.1 cfs

Station: C2 - Jack's Creek Flow Flow Flow(cfs per (cfs per (cfs per

Distance Depth Depth Area Velocity Velocity Velocity incremental incremental ncremental(ft) (in) (ft) (ftA2) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) width) width) width)1.3 3.5 0.291.8 5.0 0.42 0.21 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.12.3 4.5 0.38 0.19 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.12.8 2.0 0.17 0.06 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.03.0 0.0 0.00

Flow= 0.2 0.2 0.2 cfsAvg. Flow = 0.2 cfs

AR300950

Page 193: Documentin

Flow CalculationDate: 11/23/92Station: D - Jack's Creek Flow Flow Flow

(cfs per (cfs per (cfs perDistance Depth Depth Area Velocity Velocity Velocity incremental incremental ncremental

(ft) (in) (ft) (ftA2) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) (ft/sec) width) width) width)0.5 0.0 0.001.0 4.0 0.33 0.17 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.01.5 5.0 0.42 0.21 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.1 0.1 0.12.0 5.0 0.42 0.21 1.0 0.9 1.0 0.2 0.2 0.22.5 4.0 0.33 0.17 1.1 1.1 1.1 0.2 0.2 0.23.0 4.0 0.33 0.17 1.0 1.1 1.0 0.2 0.2 0.23.5 3.5 0.29 0.15 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.1 0.1 0.14.0 3.5 0.29 0.15 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.14.5 2.0 0.17

Flow= 0.7 0.7 0.7 cfsAvg. Flow = 0.7 cfs

AR30095!