impuls seminar, tokyo, japan€¦ · impuls seminar, tokyo, japan a/p christine lee head,...
TRANSCRIPT
11/12/06
1
School-Based Lesson Study in Singapore
30 November 2011
IMPULS SEMINAR, Tokyo, Japan
A/P Christine Lee Head, Curriculum, Teaching & Learning Academic Group
National Institute of Education
Outline of Presentation
• Extent of School-based Lesson Study in Singapore schools.
• Practice of Lesson Study.
• Issues arising from practice of Lesson Study in Singapore schools.
11/12/06
2
§ About 364 primary, secondary and post-secondary schools
§ About 31,000 teachers with 79% graduate teachers; 1847 Allied Educators
§ English is the medium of instruction
§ Centralised Curriculum (80%) from MOE and 20% (school-based curriculum)
Context of Educational System
• teach less • improve the quality of interaction
between teachers and students • equip students with the knowledge
and skills and values to prepare them for life
A call from PM Lee Hsien Loong during his inaugural National Day Rally in 2004 for schools and teachers to:
Reform Initiative: Teach Less, Learn More
11/12/06
3
§ Three a'ribu+ng factors prevalent in top performing educa+on systems (McKinsey, 2007) • geAng the right people to become teachers • developing them into effec+ve teachers; • ensuring that the system is able to deliver the best possible instruc+on for every child.
§ Teacher quality made the largest difference in student achievement and the most effec+ve school systems invested in their teachers (McKinsey, 2007).
§ High investment in educa+on in Singapore: Much of the investment goes to the development of teachers.
HIGH INVESTMENT IN TEACHER EDUCATION
• Give teachers more time and space. – Reduce curriculum content – Creation of white space
• Provide additional resources to schools ready to prototype their ideas for TLLM and bring in new school practices.
Support from MOE Provision of Top Down Support for
Bottom-up Initiatives
11/12/06
4
Support from MOE
• Enhance professional development and mentorship of teachers:
– Strengthen focus on professional development in curriculum customisation, pedagogy and assessment;
– Offload experienced teachers, such as Senior Teachers or Heads of Department, to mentor beginning teachers;
– A new position of school staff developer in schools created.
q Lesson Study started in Singapore schools in 2004 supported by the faculty from the National Institute of Education.
q It has now grown by leaps and bounds.
Extent of LS in Singapore
Exploratory Stage: Just do it
11/12/06
5
Results from Dipstick Survey 2011
Primary Secondary Jr College Total Responded 94 104 4 202 Doing LS 64 (68%) 70 (67%) 2 (50%) 136 (67%) Beyond 2012
78 (83%) 81 (78%) 3 (75%) 162 (80%)
Overall Response Rate to Online Survey: 60%
The Growing Interest in Lesson Study in Singapore
11/12/06
6
Number of Lesson Study Teams in 2011
Impetus for Growth of Lesson Study in Singapore schools
• PLC Initiative from STB, MOE in 2009. Lesson Study is one of 3 platforms for developing PLCs
• In Sep 2009, at the annual MOE Work Plan Seminar, the Minister cited Lesson Study as an avenue for building schools into Professional Learning Communities, thus escalating demand for lesson study training.
• The launch of Academy of Singapore Teachers in 2010.
• Marshall Cavendish Institute also offers Lesson Study training and support to schools.
11/12/06
7
MOE Support of Lesson Study
• 26 Aug 2009: Address by the Director-‐General (Educa+on) at the Teachers’ Mass Lecture – “teachers taking ownership in designing learning for students”
– “Professional Learning Communities are powerful platforms for teachers to learn from one another, and for teachers to be leading teachers. There are 51 Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) today. We will in fact increase the number of these PLCs as we go forward. PLCs are a way of learning that can help level up teacher professionalism in a quick and effective way.”
MOE Support of Lesson Study
• 17 Sep 2009: Speech by Minister of Educa+on (Dr Ng Eng Hen) at MOE Workplan Seminar – Teacher-driven culture of professional excellence: “enabling teachers to develop themselves”
– Professional Learning Communi+es — Teachers driving professionalism: “an example is Tampines Primary, where teachers conduct peer lesson observa+ons, with a post-‐lesson observa+on conference to provide feedback and exchange best prac+ces with one another”
– Video clip of teacher who a'ended WALS Conference 2008.
11/12/06
8
Course Title Duration Participants INTRODUCTION TO LESSON STUDY
7 hrs Teams composed of key personnel (P, VPs, HODs) and teachers from all levels
CRAFTING A RESEARCH LESSON
10 hrs Members of lesson study team
EXPERIENCING LESSON STUDY
7 hrs Teams composed of key personnel (P, VPs, HODs) and teachers from all levels
LESSON STUDY AS A TOOL FOR TEACHER LEADERS
14 hrs Teams composed of key personnel (P, VPs, HODs) and teachers from all levels
NIE’s Provision of Training to Schools
Number of schools trained in introductory workshops (as of Nov 2011)
NORTH ZONE 65/89 schools
(31 Pri/32 Sec/2 JC)
EAST ZONE 70/90 Schools
(31 Pri/35 Sec/4 JC)
SOUTH ZONE 57/87 Schools
(26 Pri/27 Sec/4 JC)
WEST ZONE 61/88 Schools
(32 Pri/26 Sec/3 JC)
Total of 253/354 schools (71.47%)
11/12/06
9
Number of Schools with CriOcal Mass Trained (> 5 as of Nov 2011)
NORTH ZONE 29/89 schools
EAST ZONE 38/90 Schools
SOUTH ZONE 27/87 Schools
WEST ZONE 39/88 Schools
Total of 133/354 schools
(37.57%)
Major Findings from a CRPP Funded Lesson Study
Pilot Project in a Primary School (2006 – 2007)
11/12/06
10
Researchers
NIE/CRPP/CTL Research Community
NIE Teacher Educator Community
Subject & Curriculum Experts
School as a Professional Teaching Community
School Leaders/Teachers
• Classroom & Pupils • Protected time for LS • Teaching Resources
• Research theories • Research methodologies e.g. Design Experiment
Lesson Study as a Community of Practice (COP)
Lesson Study
• Subject knowledge • PCK • Educational theory and philosophy
Community of Practice (Wenger, 1998)
Implementing LS in a Primary School
20 Studies of Lessons Across Grades & Subjects
6 in Mathematics, 5 in English, 2 in Social Studies
2 in Malay Language, 2 in Tamil Language, 1 in Science,
1 in Chinese Language & 1 in Physical Education
2006 Cycle 1 (Jan-Apr) Learning by doing
Cycle 2 (July-Sept)
Improving & adapting to local context
2007 Cycle 3 (Jan-April)
Experimenting with whole school approach - teacher leaders as
facilitators
Cycle 4 (July-Sept) Deepening teachers curriculum and
subject matter knowledge
11/12/06
11
Major Findings: Teachers’ Participation
• Majority of teachers: – were satisfied with Lesson Study as a process for
improving teaching and learning in the subject areas but found it difficult to cope with the competing demands in the school.
– felt more confident to have colleagues observe their lessons.
– gained confidence in teaching the topics (of research lessons) selected by their teams.
• Lesson study teams became sites for mentoring beginning teachers
Shift in Teachers’ Planning Orientation from Focusing on Instructional Strategies to Meaningful Learning Opportunities for
Students
50.0%
26.9%
17.5% 20.9%
Mtg1Y06 Mtg2Y06
Planning Sessions in 2006
12.8% 10.7%
24.6%18.2% 21.0%
31.9%
51.8%
24.6%
36.4%
27.1%
Mtg1Y07 Mtg2Y07 Mtg3Y07 Mtg4Y07 Mtg5Y07
Planning Sessions in 2007
11/12/06
12
The role of subject specialists is critical in enhancing the level of pedagogical content
knowledge of the teams
Major Findings: Role of Faculty and Researchers
• Enabling and supporting knowledge building
• As brokers for knowledge and resources
• Provision of training • Documenting and
studying teacher learning
well-‐honed repertoire of ways of reasoning with tools and artefacts
LS
Well-honed repertoire of ways of reasoning with tools and artifacts
11/12/06
13
Power Factors into the Egalitarian Interaction in
Lesson Study
• Lesson Study is an egalitarian platform where participants, regardless of years of experiences, are able to contribute thoughts and suggestions freely
• Nevertheless power factors into the interactions. Ideas offered by those perceived to possess more knowledge were accepted more readily in the lesson design.
The issue is how do we build norms and protocols to support sharing and community building in the early stage of lesson study?
2009 LESSON STUDY SURVEY FINDINGS
11/12/06
14
What are support mechanisms in the school?
reduced workload
5%
protected time28%
relief teachers
8%grassroot interest13%
advocate23%
resource links12%
other11% “Other”
• Supportive school
leaders & HODs • Training of LS
facilitators • Sharing among
teachers • Sharing by other
schools
Problems “Others”
• Initial skepticism among teachers
• Building up resources for the RL
• Entire cycle is time consuming & intense
• “Fighting” for time with other initiatives (e.g. AR, LC, UbD)
• Teachers holding other responsibilities
• Teams not strong in content, pedagogy & facilitation
11/12/06
15
Summary of Findings: Teachers’ Voices
What did teachers like or dislike Lesson Study? Ø The teachers liked – post-RL discussions (84%) – observing the RLs (78%) Ø Top of the list of dislikes is planning meetings
(10%) • The RL teachers seemed to benefit more from LS
than those who did not teach the RLs.
What Teachers Like/Dislike about LS
11/12/06
16
Positive Outcomes of Lesson Study
• Bring about greater collegiality among teachers • A site for the mentoring of beginning teachers • Sharing of lesson study experiences within
schools, across schools and at national and international platforms
• Deepening of subject matter knowledge and PCK • Develop teacher capacity for curriculum redesign
Need for more research to collect evidences of
teacher learning and student learning
Common Practices & Concerns
In planning, teacher teams • decide on the topic of the research lesson without giving adequate a'en+on to a discussion of a research problem which LS is a'emp+ng to address. • over-‐plan by including too many ac+vi+es in a lesson. • spend a lot of +me in developing the lesson plan with inadequate a'en+on to how they are going to observe the lesson • include a group-‐work component for the sake of observers of their research lesson • do not situate their single research lesson in a unit of work and that a single lesson is sufficient to improve learning • are concerned about the collec+on of quan+ta+ve data as evidence that students have learnt.
11/12/06
17
Common Practices & Concerns
In observing research lessons, teachers • are not sure what to observe and how to take notes • tend to observe the teacher rather than the student (s) (ingrained practice)
• do not use a camera or video camera as additional tools of observations • sometimes interfere with the group process
Common Practices and Concerns
In post-lesson discussions, teachers • who participated in the planning process are not able to attend post-lesson discussion because of conflicting schedules • share their reflections largely based on recall or opinions without reference to data such as observation notes or concrete examples • do not use students’ work for discussion • comment on teacher’s delivery/teaching (He/she should have….) • do not use the video as a source of evidence • do not after the cycle document carefully the materials, tools, and artifacts produced during the process.
11/12/06
18
Early Adopters of Lesson Study
Lesson Study in Singapore is still in its early stages of development. We started only in 2004. It would take time to bring about changes in school culture and mindsets of teachers. Much more work has to be done to develop the quality of Lesson Study.
A Video Case of a Mathematics Lesson Study
Team – Lesson on Long Division with Remainder
(16 mins)
11/12/06
19
THANK YOU