improving lipid production from bagasse hydrolysate with trichosporon fermentans by response surface...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Improving lipid production from bagasse hydrolysate with Trichosporon fermentans by response surface methodology](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022080110/5750740f1a28abdd2e928f4b/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Research
Pap
er
RESEARCH PAPER New Biotechnology �Volume 29, Number 3 � February 2012
Improving lipid production from bagassehydrolysate with Trichosporon fermentansby response surface methodology
Chao Huang1, Hong Wu1, Ri-feng Li1 and Min-hua Zong2
1 Laboratory of Applied Biocatalysis, College of Light Industry and Food Sciences, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China2 State Key Laboratory of Pulp and Paper Engineering, College of Light Industry and Food Sciences, South China University of Technology,
Guangzhou 510640, China
Oleaginous yeast Trichosporon fermentans was proved to be able to use sulphuric acid-treated sugar cane
bagasse hydrolysate as substrate to grow and accumulate lipid. Activated charcoal was shown as effective
as the more expensive resin Amberlite XAD-4 for removing the inhibitors from the hydrolysate. To
further improve the lipid production, response surface methodology (RSM) was used and a 3-level
4-factor Box–Behnken design was adopted to evaluate the effects of C/N ratio, inoculum concentration,
initial pH and fermentation time on the cell growth and lipid accumulation of T. fermentans. Under the
optimum conditions (C/N ratio 165, inoculum concentration 11%, initial pH 7.6 and fermentation time
9 days), a lipid concentration of 15.8 g/L, which is quite close to the predicted value of 15.6 g/L, could be
achieved after cultivation of T. fermentans at 25 8C on the pretreated bagasse hydrolysate and the
corresponding lipid coefficient (lipid yield per mass of sugar, %) was 14.2. These represent a 32.8%
improvement in the lipid concentration and a 21.4% increase in the lipid coefficient compared with the
original values before optimization (11.9 g/L and 11.7). This work further demonstrates that
T. fermentans is a promising strain for lipid production and thus biodiesel preparation from abundant
and inexpensive lignocellulosic materials.
IntroductionMicrobial oils, namely single cell oils (SCOs), have attracted more
and more attention as a promising feedstock for biodiesel produc-
tion because of their similarity to vegetable oils in fatty acid
composition [1]. However, the high cost of the culture medium
makes microbial oils less economically competitive. As a result,
production of microbial oils from wastes or renewable materials is
of significant importance. Up to date, several types of agro-indus-
trial residues, including sewage sludge, glycerol and monosodium
glutamate wastewater, have been used for this purpose [2–4], but
using lignocellulosic biomass seems to be a better strategy for cost-
effective preparation of lipids on a large scale because of its low
cost and most availability in nature.
Recent reports on lipid production with oleaginous microorgan-
ism on the synthetic medium containing xylose have suggested the
Corresponding authors: Zong, M.-h. ([email protected]), Wu, H. ([email protected])
372 www.elsevier.com/locate/nbt 1871-6784/$
possibility of microbial oils production from lignocellulosic
hydrolysate [3,5,6] and our work confirmed that Trichosporon fer-
mentans, a kind of oleaginous yeast belonging to the family of
Cryptococcaceae, could use the detoxified rice straw acid hydrolysate
for microbial lipid production although the lipid concentration and
lipid content were lower than that with glucose as the sole carbon
source (11.5 g/L vs. 17.5 g/L; 40.1% vs. 62.4%) [7]. And it is expect-
able that optimizing the fermentation conditions by some statistical
methods can improve the lipid production of T. fermentans on
lignocellulosic hydrolysate. Response surface methodology (RSM)
is a statistical technique for designing experiments, building mod-
els, evaluating the effect of the factors and searching for optimal
conditions [8]. During the past decades, RSM has been extensively
applied in the optimization of medium composition, fermentation
conditions and food manufacturing processes [9–11]. Conse-
quently, the influences of the key variables on the microbial oil
fermentation by T. fermentans could be examined by RSM.
- see front matter � 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.nbt.2011.03.008
![Page 2: Improving lipid production from bagasse hydrolysate with Trichosporon fermentans by response surface methodology](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022080110/5750740f1a28abdd2e928f4b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
New Biotechnology �Volume 29, Number 3 � February 2012 RESEARCH PAPER
TABLE 1
Coding and levels of experiment factors
Factor Symbol Code level
�1 0 1
C/N ratioa X1 130 170 210
Inoculum concentration X2 5% 10% 15%
Initial pH X3 7.0 7.5 8.0
Fermentation time X4 8 days 9 days 10 days
a The sugar concentration in the bagasse hydrolysate was fixed at 123.5 g/L. Yeast extract,
whose concentration was fixed at 0.5 g/L, and peptone were used as nitrogen source
(assuming that peptone contains 14% N (w/w) and 8% C (w/w), and yeast extract includes
7% N (w/w) and 12% C (w/w)). Different C/N ratio was obtained by altering the nitrogen
source concentration.
ResearchPap
er
Sugar cane is widely planted in many countries, especially in
Brazil, India, Cuba, Mexico, Indonesia, Colombia and China [12]
and bagasse, the fibrous residue after extracting the juice from
sugar cane in the sugar production process, represents one of the
major lignocellulosic materials in Southern China. But to date,
little has been done on its value-added utilization and there has
been no report on efficient lipid fermentation from sugar cane
bagasse. Compared with other lignocellulosic biomass [7,13],
bagasse seems to be more competitive for lipid production
because of its low collection cost as a result that it can be used
directly for hydrolysis and the following fermentation in sugar
plants. Hence, in this work, the potential of T. fermentans in
accumulating lipid on bagasse hydrolysate was examined for the
first time. By contrast, resin was most commonly used for lig-
nocellulosic hydrolysate detoxification [7,14]; however, this
undoubtedly increased the whole process cost because of its
high price. So, a cheaper adsorbent, activated charcoal was
utilized in this work for evaluating its potential in removing
the inhibitors in lignocellulosic hydrolysate. For an enhanced
lipid production, RSM was adopted to optimize the fermentation
parameters.
Materials and methodsBagasse hydrolysate preparationBagasse from Guangdong Province in Southern China was
smashed to less than 0.5 mm and then mixed with dilute sulphuric
acid (1.5%, v/v) to give a mixture with a solid loading of 10% (w/v).
The mixture was treated in an autoclave at 121 8C for 90 min and
the liquid fraction was separated by vacuum filtration after cooling
and stored at 4 8C before use.
Detoxification procedureSulphuric acid-treated bagasse hydrolysate (SABH) was
detoxified before fermentation and the detoxification includes
overliming, concentration and adsorption. The procedure of
overliming and concentration was carried out as described pre-
viously [7]. As for adsorption, activated charcoal was used as the
adsorbent instead of resin Amberlite XAD-4 for its much lower
price. It was washed with water and equilibrated with 0.4 M HCl,
and then mixed with the concentrated hydrolysate (1/10, w/v).
The mixture was incubated at 30 8C, 200 rpm for 1 h and the
following filtration resulted in the detoxified hydrolysate, whose
pH was then adjusted to fermentation pH value with Ca(OH)2 or
5 M H2SO4.
Microorganism, media, precultivation and cultivationT. fermentans CICC 1368 was supplied by China Center of Indus-
trial Culture Collection and kept on wort agar at 4 8C. The pre-
culture was performed on precultivation medium (g/L, xylose 20,
peptone 10, yeast extract 10) in a 250 ml conical flask containing
50 ml fermentation broth at 28 8C and 160 rpm for 24 h. Then,
10% seed culture was inoculated to the culture medium. In
addition to the hydrolysate (detoxified SABH), the culture med-
ium also contained (g/L): yeast extract 0.5, peptone 1.8,
MgSO4�7H2O 0.4, KH2PO4 2.0, MnSO4�H2O 0.004, CuSO4�5H2O
0.0001. Cultivation was performed in a 250 ml conical flask
containing 50 ml fermentation broth in a rotary shaker at
25 8C and 160 rpm.
Optimization of lipid production by Box–Behnken design (BBD)A 3-level 4-factor Box–Behnken design was adopted to evaluate the
effects of C/N ratio (X1), inoculum concentration (X2), initial pH
value (X3) and fermentation time (X4) on the lipid production of T.
fermentans on SABH and a model was developed. In this study, the
experimental plan contained 29 trials and the independent vari-
ables were studied at three different levels, namely low (�1),
medium (0) and high (+1), whose values are shown in Table 1.
All the experiments were done in triplicate and the average lipid
concentration obtained after fermentation was taken as the
response variable (Y). The experimental design used in this work
is shown in Table 2. The response variable was fitted by a second-
order model to correlate the response variables to the independent
variables. The second order polynomial coefficients were calcu-
lated and analyzed using the ‘Design Expert’ software (Version 7.0,
Stat-Ease Inc., Minneapolis, USA). The general form of the second-
degree polynomial equation is:
Y ¼ b0 þX
biXi þ bi jXiX j þX
biiX2i : (1)
where Y is the predicted response; b0 the intercept, bi the linear
coefficient, bij the quadratic coefficient, bii is the linear-by-linear
interaction between Xi and Xj regression coefficients and Xi, Xj are
input variables that influence the response variable Y.
Statistical analysis of the model was performed to evaluate the
analysis of variance (ANOVA). This analysis included Fisher’s F-
test (overall model significance), its associated probability p(F),
correlation coefficient R, determination coefficient R2 which
measure the goodness of fit of regression model. For each variable,
the quadratic models were represented as contour plots (3D)
and response surface curves were generated using Design Expert
software.
Analytical methodsBiomass, lipid content and fatty acid profile of the lipid were
determined as described by Zhu et al. [6]. The hydrolysate samples
were analyzed by HPLC, using a method described before [7] and
the total reducing sugar concentration was measured by the DNS
method [15].
Results and discussionMicrobial oil production on pretreated bagasse hydrolysateThere are four main kinds of monosaccharide in SABH, namely,
xylose, glucose, arabinose and galactose and pentose was about
www.elsevier.com/locate/nbt 373
![Page 3: Improving lipid production from bagasse hydrolysate with Trichosporon fermentans by response surface methodology](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022080110/5750740f1a28abdd2e928f4b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
RESEARCH PAPER New Biotechnology �Volume 29, Number 3 � February 2012
TABLE 2
Box–Behnken design arrangement and responses
Run Code level Lipid yield (g/L)
X1 X2 X3 X4 Actual value Predicted value
1 0 �1 1 0 9.50 9.21
2 �1 1 0 0 10.55 10.83
3 1 0 0 1 7.95 7.58
4 1 0 �1 0 5.74 6.28
5 0 0 0 0 15.30 15.31
6 1 �1 0 0 7.29 6.57
7 0 1 0 1 8.27 8.28
8 0 1 0 �1 10.78 10.93
9 �1 �1 0 0 6.52 6.97
10 0 0 0 0 14.95 15.31
11 0 0 1 �1 13.22 12.37
12 0 0 1 1 9.32 9.52
13 0 0 0 0 15.73 15.31
14 �1 0 �1 0 11.39 10.89
15 0 �1 0 �1 7.06 7.47
16 1 1 0 0 8.41 7.51
17 �1 0 0 �1 10.63 11.03
18 0 1 1 0 9.39 9.54
19 0 0 0 0 15.10 15.31
20 �1 0 1 0 10.18 10.06
21 0 0 �1 �1 9.83 9.18
22 0 �1 0 1 6.68 6.95
23 1 0 1 0 10.04 10.95
24 1 0 0 �1 9.08 9.62
25 0 0 0 0 15.49 15.31
26 �1 0 0 1 10.41 9.90
27 0 1 �1 0 9.37 9.69
28 0 �1 �1 0 5.33 5.22
29 0 0 �1 1 8.46 8.86
B
A
12111098765432100
20
40
60
80
100
120
Suga
r con
cent
ratio
n (g
/L)
Fermentation time (d)
1211109876543210
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
15
20
25
30
35
40
Lip
id c
onte
nt (%
)
Bio
mas
s (g/
L) /
lipid
yie
ld (g
/L)
Fermentation time (d)
FIGURE 1
Microbial oil production on sulphuric acid-treated sugar cane bagasse
hydrolysate by T. fermentans. (a) Time course of cell growth and lipid
accumulation. (~) Biomass; (&) lipid yield; (*) lipid content; (b) time courseof sugar utilization. (&) Total sugars; (~) xylose; (!) glucose; (5) arabinose;
(^) galactose. Fermentation conditions: inoculum concentration 10%, initial
pH 6.5, 25 8C, 160 rpm.
Research
Pap
er
five times more than hexose (Table 3). As seen from Table 3, before
detoxification, the concentration of each tested inhibitor in
bagasse hydrolysate was nearly the same as that in rice straw
hydrolysate and using cheap activated charcoal as adsorbent
yielded a hydrolysate of similar inhibitor concentration to that
of rice straw hydrolysate treated with resin Amberlite XAD-4 and
TABLE 3
Composition of bagasse hydrolysate after each step of detoxificatio
Compound (g/L) Untreated hydrolysate O
Glucose 5.2
Xylose 30.2 2
Galactose 1.5
Arabinose 3.9
Acetic acid 1.7
Furfural 0.72
5-HMF 0.04
374 www.elsevier.com/locate/nbt
suitable for microbial oil fermentation [7]. This can remarkably
decrease the cost of hydrolysate detoxification. The time courses of
cell growth and lipid accumulation of T. fermentans on the detox-
ified SABH are shown in Fig. 1a, and the sugar concentration
during the fermentation is presented in Fig. 1b. Similar to the
fermentation on rice straw hydrolysate in our previous work [7],
there was a clear lag phase at the beginning of fermentation as
indicated by the phenomenon that on the 1st day, the growth and
lipid accumulation were hardly detected. The presence of some
inhibitors in the fermentation broth partly contributes to this.
After that, the biomass began to increase, with the specific growth
n treatment
verliming Concentration Adsorption
4.8 18.1 16.8
8.2 116.1 92.9
1.3 5.1 2.4
3.4 14.2 11.4
1.4 4.0 3.7
0.39 0.00 0.00
0.03 0.11 0.02
![Page 4: Improving lipid production from bagasse hydrolysate with Trichosporon fermentans by response surface methodology](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022080110/5750740f1a28abdd2e928f4b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
New Biotechnology �Volume 29, Number 3 � February 2012 RESEARCH PAPER
ResearchPap
er
rate increasing from 0.03 h�1 during the first day to 0.08 h�1
during the second day, indicating that the cells had gradually
adapted to the fermentation environment. From day 2 to day 3,
hexoses (glucose and galactose) were gradually used up and the
cells began to use pentoses (xylose and arabinose) simultaneously
as the carbon source. Obviously, the four sugars can be completely
utilized by T. fermentans cells although the cells used them in
different orders and at varying rates. From the 2nd day, biomass
increased steadily and reached the maximal at day 11. By contrast,
lipid accumulation was also delayed with quite a low lipid content
during the first three days, in contrast to our previous study using
glucose as the sole carbon source where no obvious delay was
recorded [6]. There are several possible reasons for this. First, the
nitrogen source concentration was quite high at the beginning of
fermentation, and generally only under nitrogen deficiency con-
ditions could the lipid be biosynthesized and accumulated in a
large quantity [16]. Second, the inhibitors in the hydrolysate
greatly inhibited the growth and lipid accumulation of oleaginous
yeast [17]. From day 3, the lipid content of the yeast cells increased
sharply and reached the maximum of 39.9% on day 9. After that, a
clear decline in lipid content was observed. However, the biomass
went up continuously. The similar phenomena were also reported
previously [6,7,18] and the use of the accumulated lipid for cell
growth accounts for this. The maximum lipid concentration of
11.9 g/L was achieved on the 9th day and the corresponding lipid
coefficient (lipid yield per mass of sugar, %) was 11.7. Compared
with our previous works [6,7], these results are close to those on the
pretreated rice straw hydrolysate (11.5 g/L and 11.9), but still
much lower than those on the synthetic nitrogen-limited medium
without any inhibitors (17.5 g/L and 20.6) under the same fer-
mentation conditions.
TABLE 4
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the quadratic model
Source DF Sum of squares Mean squar
Model 14 242.73 17.34
X1 1 10.40 10.40
X2 1 17.26 17.26
X3 1 11.08 11.08
X4 1 7.54 7.54
X1X2 1 2.12 2.12
X1X3 1 7.59 7.59
X1X4 1 0.21 0.21
X2X3 1 4.31 4.31
X2X4 1 1.13 1.13
X3X4 1 1.60 1.60
X12 1 62.67 62.67
X22 1 116.52 116.52
X32 1 45.92 45.92
X42 1 46.27 46.27
Residual 14 6.06 0.43
Lack of fit 10 5.67 0.57
Pure error 4 0.38 0.10
Total 28 248.78
R2 = 0.9757; Adj. R2 = 0.9513.
Optimization of fermentation parameters with RSMAmong different optimization method, RSM has attracted more
and more attention because of its non-requirement on the calcu-
lation of the local sensitivity of each design variable and being
effective for both the single- and multi-disciplinary optimization
problems. So RSM was adopted to further improve the lipid
production in this work.
The single factor experimental results (data not shown) sug-
gested that the major factors affecting the lipid production on
pretreated SABH were C/N ratio, inoculum concentration, initial
pH, and fermentation time. Thus, a 3-level 4-factor BBD was used
to evaluate the effects of the above-mentioned four factors on the
lipid production. The corresponding BBD and experimental data
are shown in Table 2. It can be seen from Table 2 that the lipid
concentration was significantly influenced by the fermentation
conditions. After the analysis of variance which gave the level of
response as a function of four independent variables by employing
multiple regression analysis, the regression equation was obtained.
A quadratic model for the lipid concentration of T. fermentans is
given below (in terms of coded factors):
Y ¼ 15:31 � 0:93X1 þ 1:20X2 þ 0:96X3 � 0:79X4 � 0:73X1X2
þ 1:38X1X3 � 0:23X1X4 � 1:04X2X3 � 0:53X2X4
� 0:63X3X4 � 3:11X12 � 4:24X2
2 � 2:66X32 � 2:67X4
2; (2)
where Y is the predicted lipid concentration (g/L) and X1, X2, X3
and X4 were C/N ratio (mol/mol), inoculum concentration (%),
initial pH and fermentation time (days), respectively.
Table 4 shows the results of the quadratic polynomial model in
the form of analysis of variance (ANOVA), which was done by the
software Design-Expert. As shown in Table 4, the model was highly
e F-value P-value Coefficient estimate
40.08 <0.0001
24.04 0.0002 �0.9339.89 <0.0001 1.20
25.61 0.0002 0.96
17.42 0.0009 �0.794.89 0.0441 �0.73
17.55 0.0009 1.38
0.48 0.5004 �0.239.95 0.0070 �1.042.62 0.1277 �0.533.70 0.0750 �0.63
144.88 <0.0001 �3.11269.37 <0.0001 �4.24106.17 <0.0001 �2.66106.97 <0.0001 �2.67
5.93 0.0505
www.elsevier.com/locate/nbt 375
![Page 5: Improving lipid production from bagasse hydrolysate with Trichosporon fermentans by response surface methodology](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022080110/5750740f1a28abdd2e928f4b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
RESEARCH PAPER New Biotechnology �Volume 29, Number 3 � February 2012
Research
Pap
er
significant with a very high model F-value (40.08) and a very low P-
value (P < 0.0001). The R2 value (0.9757) indicated a good agree-
ment between the experimental and the predicted values and
showed that the model was reliable for lipid production in this
work. The value of adj-R2 (0.9513) suggested that the total varia-
tion of 95.13% for the lipid concentration was attributed to the
independent variables and only about 4.87% of the total variation
could not be explained by the model. The lack-of-fit value was not
FIGURE 2
Response surface plots showing binary interaction of different variables. The interafermentation time and C/N, (d) initial pH and inoculum concentration, (e) fermentat
376 www.elsevier.com/locate/nbt
significant (P = 0.0505), indicating that the equation was adequate
for predicting lipid concentration under all conditions. The model
coefficients for each variable are also shown in Table 4 and F-value
and P-value were employed to check the significance of each
coefficient of the model. The larger F-value and smaller P-value
suggested higher significance of the corresponding coefficient.
Among the model terms, X1, X2, X3, X4, X1X3, X2X3, X12, X2
2,
X32, X4
2 were significant at the 99% probability level and X1X2 was
ction between (a) inoculum concentration and C/N, (b) initial pH and C/N, (c)ion time and inoculum concentration and (f) fermentation time and initial pH.
![Page 6: Improving lipid production from bagasse hydrolysate with Trichosporon fermentans by response surface methodology](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022080110/5750740f1a28abdd2e928f4b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
New Biotechnology �Volume 29, Number 3 � February 2012 RESEARCH PAPER
TABLE 5
Fatty acid composition of plant oils and lipid from T. fermentansa
Lipid source Fatty acid composition of lipid (%)
C14:0 C16:0 C18:2 C18:1 C18:0 Others
Canola NDb 4–5 20–31 55–63 1–2 10–12
Corn NDb 7–13 39–52 30.5–43 2.5–3 1
Olive 1.3 7–18.3 4–19 55.5–84.5 1.4–3.3 NDb
Palm 0.6–2.4 32–46.3 6–12 37–53 4–6.3 NDb
Peanut 0.5 6–12.5 13–41 37–61 2.5–6 1
Safflower (high oleic) NDb 4–8 11–19 73.6–79 2.3–8 NDb
Soybean NDb 2.3–11 49–53 22–30.8 2.4–6 2–10.5
T. fermentans 0.7 27.5 10.1 54.2 5.8 1.7a The composition of different plant oils was described as the previous work [20].b ND means not detected. R
esearchPap
er
at the 95% probability level. By contrast, other terms were not
significant.
The relationship between the response and experimental
levels of each variable can be demonstrated by three-dimen-
sional response surface plots which represented the regression
equation mentioned above. And the optimal levels of the vari-
ables can also be determined visually be these plots [19]. The
response surface curves are shown in Fig. 2. As shown in the
surface plots, there were obvious interactions between each pair
of variables. The interaction of C/N ratio and initial pH value, C/
N ratio and inoculum concentration, and inoculum concentra-
tion and initial pH value was significant (P-value less than 0.05).
Among them, the interaction of X1X3 was positive to the lipid
concentration whereas the other two were negative. Surpris-
ingly, the interaction between fermentation time (X4) and
each other three variances was not significant, indicating that
fermentation time showed little influence on the other three
variables. According to the analysis by the ‘Design-expert’ soft-
ware, the optimal values of the four key variables for lipid
fermentation of T. fermentans were C/N ratio 164.82, inoculum
concentration 10.73%, initial pH 7.57 and fermentation time
8.83 days, respectively.
TABLE 6
Lipid production on different agro-industrial residues by various m
Strain Carbon source Initial casource co(g/L)
Y. lipolytica Industrial fats 10.0
M. isabellina Glycerol 26.8
Mucor sp. RRL001 Tapioca starch ND a
C. echinulata Glycerol 26.7
L. starkeyi Sewage sludge 40.0b
R. glutinis Monosodium glutamate wastewater 35.0
T. fermentans Molasses 150.0
T. fermentans Rice straw hydrolysate 116.9
T. fermentans Sugar cane bagasse hydrolysate 123.5
a ND means not detected.b About 40 g/L glucose was added into sewage sludge.
Lipid production under optimal conditionsFor operation convenience, the optimal fermentation para-
meters were set as follows: C/N ratio 165, inoculum concentra-
tion 11%, initial pH 7.6 and fermentation time 9 days. Under
these conditions, a lipid concentration of 15.8 g/L, which is
quite close to the predicted value of 15.6 g/L (relative error
1.41%), could be obtained after cultivation of T. fermentans at
25 8C on the pretreated SABH whose sugar concentration was
123.5 g/L. And the corresponding lipid coefficient was 14.2.
These represented a 32.8% improvement in the lipid concentra-
tion and a 21.4% increase in the lipid coefficient compared with
the original values before optimization with RSM (11.9 g/L and
11.7), indicating that RSM is a powerful tool for optimization of
fermentation process.
As can be seen from Table 5, the lipid from T. fermentans mainly
contained palmitic acid, stearic acid, oleic acid and linoleic acid,
and the unsaturated fatty acids amounted to about 65%. A com-
parative result of the fatty acid composition between the lipid
from T. fermentans and most commonly used plant oils in biodiesel
production is also shown in Table 5. Apparently, the fatty acid
composition of the lipid is similar to that of vegetable oils, and the
lipid is a promising feedstock for biodiesel production.
icroorganisms
rbonncentration
Lipidconcentration(g/L)
Volumetricproductivity(g/L day)
Reference
3.8 2.4 [21]
3.3 0.3 [3]
5.0 ND a [22]
2.0 0.1 [3]
6.4 0.8 [2]
5.0 1.6 [4]
12.8 1.8 [6]
11.5 1.4 [7]
15.8 1.8 This work
www.elsevier.com/locate/nbt 377
![Page 7: Improving lipid production from bagasse hydrolysate with Trichosporon fermentans by response surface methodology](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022080110/5750740f1a28abdd2e928f4b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
RESEARCH PAPER New Biotechnology �Volume 29, Number 3 � February 2012
Research
Pap
er
The results of this work and those with different agro-industrial
residues as feedstock are depicted in Table 6. Although the volu-
metric productivity of T. fermentans on bagasse hydrolysate is not
as high as that of Y. lipolytica on industrial fats, the higher lipid
concentration and moderate volumetric productivity make olea-
ginous yeast T. fermentans very promising for lipid production
from abundant and inexpensive lignocellulosic materials.
ConclusionsSulphuric acid-treated sugar cane bagasse hydrolysate can be effi-
ciently used for the cell growth and lipid accumulation of T.
fermentans. Optimization of fermentation parameters by RSM
resulted in a 32.8% increase in the lipid concentration of T. fermen-
tans on SABH and a lipid concentration of 15.8 g/L, which is quite
close to the predicted value of 15.6 g/L, could be obtained after
cultivation of T. fermentans under the optimal culture conditions.
378 www.elsevier.com/locate/nbt
Also, this represented a 21.4% improvement in the lipid coefficient.
The lipid from T. fermentans has similar fatty acid composition to
that of vegetable oils, thus it is promising for biodiesel production.
AcknowledgementsWe acknowledge the National Natural Science Foundation of
China (Grant No. 31071559), the Guangdong Province
Cooperation Project of Industry, Education and Academy (Grant
No. 2008A010700006), the Science and Technology Project of
Guangdong Province (Grant No. 2009B080701085), the Open
Project Program of the State Key Laboratory of Pulp and Paper
Engineering, SCUT (Grant No. 200823), the Fundamental
Research Funds for the Central Universities, SCUT (Grant No.
2009zm0199, 2009zz0026, 2009zz0018) and Major State Basic
Research Development Program ‘973’ (Grant No. 2010CB732201)
for financial support.
References
1 Li, Q. et al. (2008) Perspectives of microbial oils for biodiesel production. Appl.
Microbiol. Biotechnol. 80, 749–756
2 Angerbauer, C. et al. (2008) Conversion of sewage sludge into lipids by Lipomyces
starkeyi for biodiesel production. Bioresour. Technol. 99, 3051–3056
3 Fakas, S. et al. (2009) Evaluating renewable carbon sources as substrates for single
cell oil production by Cunninghamella echinulata and Mortierella isabellina. Biomass
Bioenergy 33, 573–580
4 Xue, F.Y. et al. (2008) Studies on lipid production by Rhodotorula glutinis
fermentation using monosodium glutamate wastewater as culture medium.
Bioresour. Technol. 99, 5923–5927
5 Zhao, X. et al. (2008) Medium optimization for lipid production through co-
fermentation of glucose and xylose by the oleaginous yeast Lipomyces starkeyi. Eur.
J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 110, 405–412
6 Zhu, L.Y. et al. (2008) Efficient lipid production with Trichosporon fermentans and
its use for biodiesel preparation. Bioresour. Technol. 99, 7881–7885
7 Huang, C. et al. (2009) Microbial oil production from rice straw hydrolysate by
Trichosporon fermentans. Bioresour. Technol. 100, 4535–4538
8 Myers, R. et al. (2009) Response Surface Methodology: Product and Process Optimization
Using Designed Experiments. John Wiley & Sons, New York
9 Cui, F.J. et al. (2006) Optimization of the medium composition for production of
mycelial biomass and exo-polymer by Grifola frondosa GF9801 using response
surface methodology. Bioresour. Technol. 97, 1209–1216
10 Li, X. et al. (2009) Optimization of culture conditions for production of yeast
biomass using bamboo wastewater by response surface methodology. Bioresour.
Technol. 100, 3613–3617
11 Wang, X. et al. (2008) Optimization of methane fermentation from effluent of bio-
hydrogen fermentation process using response surface methodology. Bioresour.
Technol. 99, 4292–4299
12 Cardona, C.A. et al. (2010) Production of bioethanol from sugarcane bagasse:
status and perspectives. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 4754–4766
13 Chen, X. et al. (2009) Screening of oleaginous yeast strains tolerant to
lignocellulose degradation compounds. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 159,
1–14
14 de Mancilha, I.M. and Karim, M.N. (2003) Evaluation of ion exchange resins for
removal of inhibitory compounds from corn stover hydrolyzate for xylitol
fermentation. Biotechnol. Prog. 19, 1837–1841
15 Miller, G. (1959) Use of dinitrosalisylic acid (DNS) for determination of reducing
sugars. Anal. Chem. 31, 426–428
16 Ratledge, C. (2004) Fatty acid biosynthesis in microorganisms being used for Single
Cell Oil production. Biochimie 86, 807–815
17 Kimura, K. et al. (2006) Inhibition of lipid accumulation and lipid body formation
in oleaginous yeast by effective components in spices, carvacrol, eugenol, thymol,
and piperine. J. Agric. Food Chem. 54, 3528–3534
18 Fakas, S. et al. (2007) Compositional shifts in lipid fractions during lipid turnover
in Cunninghamella echinulata. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 40, 1321–1327
19 Haider, M. and Pakshirajan, K. (2007) Screening and optimization of media
constituents for enhancing lipolytic activity by a soil microorganism using
statistically designed experiments. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 141, 377–390
20 Bajpai, D. and Tyagi, V.K. (2006) Biodiesel: source, production, composition,
properties and its benefits. J. Oleo Sci. 55, 487–502
21 Papanikolaou, S. et al. (2001) Kinetic profile of the cellular lipid composition in an
oleaginous Yarrowia lipolytica capable of producing a cocoa-butter substitute from
industrial fats. Anton. Van Leeuw. Int. J. Gen. Mol. Microbiol. 80, 215–224
22 Ahmed, S.U. et al. (2006) Effects of various process parameters on the production of
gamma-linolenic acid in submerged fermentation. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 44,
283–287