improving circuit miniaturization and its efficiency using rough set theory( a machine learning...

Click here to load reader

Upload: sarvesh-singh

Post on 21-Nov-2014

110 views

Category:

Education


0 download

DESCRIPTION

A theoretical approach based on Rough Set Theory for Electronic Circuit miniaturization

TRANSCRIPT

  • 1. Improving circuit miniaturization and its efficiency using Rough Set Theory Presented by :Sarvesh Singh Rawat
  • 2. Introduction One goal of the Knowledge Discovery is extract meaningful knowledge. Rough Sets theory was introduced by Z. Pawlak (1982) as a mathematical tool for data analysis. Rough sets have many applications in the field of Knowledge Discovery: feature selection, discretization process, data imputations and create decision Rules. Rough set have been introduced as a tool to deal with, uncertain Knowledge in Artificial Intelligence Application.
  • 3. Equivalence Relation Let X be a set and let x, y, and z be elements of X. An equivalence relation R on X is a Relation on X such that: Reflexive Property: xRx for all x in X. Symmetric Property: if xRy, then yRx. Transitive Property: if xRy and yRz, then xRz.
  • 4. Rough Sets Theory Let T (U , A, C, D), be a Decision system data, Where: U is a non-empty, finite set called the universe , A is a non-empty finite set of attributes, C and D are subsets of A, Conditional and Decision attributes subsets respectively. is called the value set of a , The elements of U are objects, cases, states, observations. The Attributes are interpreted as features, variables, characteristics conditions, etc. a :U Va for a A, V a
  • 5. Indiscernibility Relation The Indecernibility relation IND(P) is an equivalence relation. Let a A , P , the indiscernibility A relation IND(P), is defined as follows: IND( P) {(x, y) U U : for all a P, a ( x) a( y)}
  • 6. Indiscernibility Relation The indiscernibility relation defines a partition in U. Let P A, U/IND(P) denotes a family of all equivalence classes of the relation IND(P), called elementary sets. Two other equivalence classes U/IND(C) and U/IND(D), called condition and decision equivalence classes respectively, can also be defined.
  • 7. R-lower approximation Let X U and R C , R is a subset of conditional features, then the R-lower approximation set of X, is the set of all elements of U which can be with certainty classified as elements of X. RX {Y U / R :Y X} R-lower approximation set of X is a subset of X
  • 8. R-upper approximation the R-upper approximation set of X, is the set of all elements of U such that: RX {Y U / R :Y X } X is a subset of R-upper approximation set of X. R-upper approximation contains all data which can possibly be classified as belonging to the set X the R-Boundary set of X is defined as: BN ( X ) RX RX
  • 9. Representation of the approximation sets If If RX RX RX RX then, X is R-definible (the boundary set is empty) then X is Rough with respect to R. ACCURACY := Card(Lower)/ Card (Upper)
  • 10. Decision Class The decision d determines the partition CLASS T (d ) { X 1 ,..., X r ( d ) } of the universe U. Where X k {x U : d ( x) k} for 1 k r (d ) CLASS T (d ) will be called the classification of objects in T determined by the decision d. The set Xk is called the k-th decision class of T
  • 11. Decision Class This system data information has 3 classes, We represent the partition: lower approximation, upper approximation and boundary set.
  • 12. Dispensable feature Let R a family of equivalence relations and let P R, P is dispensable in R if IND(R) = IND(R-{P}), otherwise P is indispensable in R. CORE The set of all indispensable relation in C will be called the core of C. CORE(C)= RED(C), where RED(C) is the family of all reducts of C.
  • 13. CASE STUDY Circuit - miniaturization In this section, a simple structure using logic gates is shown which is the magnified view of a portion of complicated circuit and it is further reduced using Rough Set based on logical classifier and rules.
  • 14. Information Table (I) , , { , {{ , , A set of data is generated by each gate in binary form (either 0 or 1), and the wires represents that attributes. The basic idea behind circuit miniaturization is to mine te data that is obtained as a result of each gate in a logical manner using algebraic developments so that the final result is not altered. The example that is shown here is a small circuit but the same technique can be implemented in bigger circuits using the same procedure.
  • 15. Information Table (II)
  • 16. Approximations Let X U and R C R is a subset of conditional , features, then the R-lower approximation RX {Y U / R :Y X} The R-upper approximation set of X, is the set of all elements of U such that: RX {Y U / R :Y X The accuracy of approximation is given by | ( PX ) | p(X ) | ( PX ) | }
  • 17. Approximation From our information system, we have two classes of decision set as 0 and 1. As the data value is discrete (either 0 or 1) so the total number of lower approximations is equal to that of the upper approximations.
  • 18. Decision rules The algorithm should minimize the number of features included in decision rules.
  • 19. Conclusions and outcomes We have reduced the number of gates without affecting the output of the given circuit using the mathematical model of Rough Set Theory. It saves a lot of time and power that is wasted in switching of gates , the wiring-crises is reduced, crosssectional area of chip is reduced, the number of transistors that can implemented in chip is multiplied many folds.
  • 20. References Pawlak, Z. (1997). Rough set approach to knowledge-based decision support. European journal of operational research, 99(1), 48-57. Pawlak, Z. (1998). Rough set theory and its applications to data analysis. Cybernetics & Systems, 29(7), 661-688. Roy, S, S. Viswanatham, V, M. Krishna, P, V. Saraf, N, Gupta. A, and Mishra, R. (2013). Applicability of Rough Set Technique for Data Investigation and Optimization of Intrusion Detection System. 9th International Conference, QShine 2013, India, January 11-12, 2013,(pp.479-484). Roy, S, S. Viswanatham, V, M. Rawat, S, S. Shah, H. (2013). Multicriteria decision examination for electrical power grid monitoring system. Intelligent Systems and Control (ISCO), 2013 7th International Conference on pp. 26-30.
  • 21. THANK YOU!