implementing an electronic records management program philip c. bantin indiana university archivist...

29
IMPLEMENTING AN ELECTRONIC RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Philip C. Bantin Indiana University Archivist [email protected] IU Electronic Records Program Website: http://www.indiana.edu/~libar ch/ER/NHPRC-2/index.html

Upload: miriam-olver

Post on 16-Dec-2015

220 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: IMPLEMENTING AN ELECTRONIC RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Philip C. Bantin Indiana University Archivist bantin@indiana.edu IU Electronic Records Program Website:

IMPLEMENTING AN ELECTRONIC RECORDS

MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Philip C. Bantin Indiana University Archivist [email protected] IU Electronic Records Program

Website: http://www.indiana.edu/~libarch/ER/NHPRC-2/index.html

Page 2: IMPLEMENTING AN ELECTRONIC RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Philip C. Bantin Indiana University Archivist bantin@indiana.edu IU Electronic Records Program Website:

RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS

Our goal is tell system designers what types of functionality need to be created or designed into the system.

Our goal is not necessarily to tell system designers how to translate these requirements into automated solutions.

However, our requirements must eventually include enough specificity to achieved desired results.

Page 3: IMPLEMENTING AN ELECTRONIC RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Philip C. Bantin Indiana University Archivist bantin@indiana.edu IU Electronic Records Program Website:

RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS

Requirements are not much different than what we would like to see in an ideal paper recordkeeping system

Differences: 1) Requires in many cases that the requirements be automated and executable by the system; 2) Reflects the fact we can do a better job documenting recordkeeping in an automated environment

Page 4: IMPLEMENTING AN ELECTRONIC RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Philip C. Bantin Indiana University Archivist bantin@indiana.edu IU Electronic Records Program Website:

Compliance The system must manage and

control electronic records according to the standards for compliance and the requirements for legal admissibility and security, and must be capable of demonstrating this compliance.

Page 5: IMPLEMENTING AN ELECTRONIC RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Philip C. Bantin Indiana University Archivist bantin@indiana.edu IU Electronic Records Program Website:

Record Capture The term capture represents the

processes of: Registering a record – Unique ID, time

and date when record entered system Assigning classification metadata to

record(s) Adding further metadata to record(s),

and retaining them in a tightly bound relationship

Storing record(s) in the ERMS.

Page 6: IMPLEMENTING AN ELECTRONIC RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Philip C. Bantin Indiana University Archivist bantin@indiana.edu IU Electronic Records Program Website:

Record Capture It is recommended that,

whenever possible, the capture function be designed into electronic systems so that the capture of records is concurrent with the automatic creation of records.

Page 7: IMPLEMENTING AN ELECTRONIC RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Philip C. Bantin Indiana University Archivist bantin@indiana.edu IU Electronic Records Program Website:

Classification Scheme Classification is the systematic identification

and arrangement of records into categories according to logically structured conventions, methods, and procedural rules represented in a classification scheme.

The system must support and be compatible with the organization’s or the application’s classification scheme.

The system must automatically assign appropriate classification metadata to records and files and to classes within the classification scheme at the point of creation and capture.

Page 8: IMPLEMENTING AN ELECTRONIC RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Philip C. Bantin Indiana University Archivist bantin@indiana.edu IU Electronic Records Program Website:

Classification Scheme The benefits of a good classification scheme

are “1) providing linkages between individual records; 2) ensuring records are named in a consistent manner over time; 3) assisting in the retrieval of all records related to a particular activity; 4) determining appropriate retention periods for records; 5) determining security protection appropriate for sets of records; 6) allocating user permissions for access to or action on particular groups of records; and 7) distributing responsibility for management of particular sets of records.”

Page 9: IMPLEMENTING AN ELECTRONIC RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Philip C. Bantin Indiana University Archivist bantin@indiana.edu IU Electronic Records Program Website:

Classification Scheme There are many types of classification

schemes, but the one recommended by this document is a scheme based an articulation of the functions and transactions of the organization derived from the analysis of business processes.

The business classification scheme represents and describes functions, business processes, transactions or other elements, and shows their relationships.

Page 10: IMPLEMENTING AN ELECTRONIC RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Philip C. Bantin Indiana University Archivist bantin@indiana.edu IU Electronic Records Program Website:

Authenticity To be authentic in archives and records

management, a record must be genuine, or be “what it claims to be.”

In order to trust that a record is authentic, the user must be assured that the systems that create, capture, and manage electronic records maintain inviolate records that are protected from accidental or unauthorized alteration and from deletion while the record still has value.

Page 11: IMPLEMENTING AN ELECTRONIC RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Philip C. Bantin Indiana University Archivist bantin@indiana.edu IU Electronic Records Program Website:

Audit Trails A system audit trail is a record that

tracks operations performed on the system. In essence, the audit trail documents the activities performed on records and their metadata from creation to disposal.

The audit trail typically documents the activities of creation, migration and other preservation activities, transfers or the movement of records, modification, deletion, defining access, and usage history.

Page 12: IMPLEMENTING AN ELECTRONIC RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Philip C. Bantin Indiana University Archivist bantin@indiana.edu IU Electronic Records Program Website:

Audit Trails The system must automatically

capture the audit trail. The audit trail data must be

unalterable.   The audit trail must be

logically linked to the records they document, so that users can review audit information when they retrieve records.

Page 13: IMPLEMENTING AN ELECTRONIC RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Philip C. Bantin Indiana University Archivist bantin@indiana.edu IU Electronic Records Program Website:

Metadata In the context of archives and records

management, metadata is structured or semi-structured information that documents the creation, management and use of records through time and across domains.

Recordkeeping metadata can identify, authenticate and contextualize records and the people, processes and systems that create, manage and use them.

Page 14: IMPLEMENTING AN ELECTRONIC RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Philip C. Bantin Indiana University Archivist bantin@indiana.edu IU Electronic Records Program Website:

Metadata The system must be capable of

extracting metadata elements automatically from records when they are captured.

The system must permit metadata values to be retrieved and captured from lookup tables or from calls to other software applications.

The system must allow creators of records to enter manually pertinent record metadata that cannot be captured automatically.

Page 15: IMPLEMENTING AN ELECTRONIC RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Philip C. Bantin Indiana University Archivist bantin@indiana.edu IU Electronic Records Program Website:

Security and Control The system must allow only

authorized personnel to create, capture, update or purge records, metadata associated with records, files of records, classes in classification schemes, and retention schedules.

The system must control access to the records according to well-defined criteria.

Page 16: IMPLEMENTING AN ELECTRONIC RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Philip C. Bantin Indiana University Archivist bantin@indiana.edu IU Electronic Records Program Website:

Retention and Disposition

The system must include an automated, schedule-driven disposition management plan.

The system must provide for the automated retention of records with long-term value in accordance with authorized and approved record retention schedules.

The system must provide for the automated destruction of records in accordance with authorized and approved records retention schedules.

Page 17: IMPLEMENTING AN ELECTRONIC RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Philip C. Bantin Indiana University Archivist bantin@indiana.edu IU Electronic Records Program Website:

Preservation Strategies, Backups

and Recovery The system must incorporate a

strategy or plan for backing up and preserving records.

The system must ensure that records, components of records, audit trails, metadata, links to metadata or to files, and classification schemes can be converted or migrated to new system hardware, software and storage media without loss of vital information.

Page 18: IMPLEMENTING AN ELECTRONIC RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Philip C. Bantin Indiana University Archivist bantin@indiana.edu IU Electronic Records Program Website:

Access and Use The system must ensure access to

and use of business records for current business and future research needs.

The system must ensure that all components of a record or file, including contents, relevant metadata, notes, attachments, etc., can be accessed, retrieved and rendered as a discrete unit or group and in a single retrieval process.

Page 19: IMPLEMENTING AN ELECTRONIC RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Philip C. Bantin Indiana University Archivist bantin@indiana.edu IU Electronic Records Program Website:

Documentation All system policies and

procedures must be defined and documented. This documentation helps to ensure continuing access to records within the system, and can be used to help prove the authenticity of a record.

Page 20: IMPLEMENTING AN ELECTRONIC RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Philip C. Bantin Indiana University Archivist bantin@indiana.edu IU Electronic Records Program Website:

System Testing

The performance and reliability of system hardware and software must be regularly tested.

Page 21: IMPLEMENTING AN ELECTRONIC RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Philip C. Bantin Indiana University Archivist bantin@indiana.edu IU Electronic Records Program Website:

Non-Electronic Records The system must be capable of classifying

and managing non-electronic, physical records and of managing electronic and non-electronic records in an integrated manner.

This means the system must be able to classify, create and retrieve audit information and other metadata, control access and define security, and apply retention and disposal schedules for non-electronic records according to the same requirements that have been defined for electronic records.

Page 22: IMPLEMENTING AN ELECTRONIC RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Philip C. Bantin Indiana University Archivist bantin@indiana.edu IU Electronic Records Program Website:

MoReq The IU Requirements are

modeled to a large degree on the “Model Requirements for the Management of Electronic Records” (MoReq) commissioned by the IDA Programme of the European Commission.

http://www.cornwell.co.uk/moreq

Page 23: IMPLEMENTING AN ELECTRONIC RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Philip C. Bantin Indiana University Archivist bantin@indiana.edu IU Electronic Records Program Website:

RECORDS MANAGEMENT APPLICATIONS (RMA)

Page 24: IMPLEMENTING AN ELECTRONIC RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Philip C. Bantin Indiana University Archivist bantin@indiana.edu IU Electronic Records Program Website:

STAND ALONE RMA PRODUCTS

TRIM by Tower Software Corp. ForeMost Enterprise, Version 2 by TrueArc,

Inc. Tarian eRecords Engine v1.0 - formerly e-

Records v1.0 by Tarian Software, Inc. iRIMS 2001 by Open Text Corp. OBJECTIVE 2000 by Objective Corp. Hummingbird RM Family 4.0 by

Hummingbird, LTD FileSurf 7.0 by MDY Advanced Tech.

Page 25: IMPLEMENTING AN ELECTRONIC RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Philip C. Bantin Indiana University Archivist bantin@indiana.edu IU Electronic Records Program Website:

Integrated RMA Products

Page 26: IMPLEMENTING AN ELECTRONIC RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Philip C. Bantin Indiana University Archivist bantin@indiana.edu IU Electronic Records Program Website:

Integration of FileNET IDM Content Services 5.1.1 and ForeMost

Enterprise 2.0

FileNET/ForeMost is an integrated product that combines the document management capabilities of FileNET IDM Content Services with the records management capabilities of ForeMost Enterprise. ForeMost provides the records management functionality for the pairing and uses the FileNET repository for storing records filed from FileNET.

Page 27: IMPLEMENTING AN ELECTRONIC RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Philip C. Bantin Indiana University Archivist bantin@indiana.edu IU Electronic Records Program Website:

IBM e-Records Solution (IeRS) version 1.0

by IBM Corporation IBM’s IeRS is a combination of IBM’s Content

Manager v7.1 and Tarian Software’s Tarian e-Records (TeR) v1.0.

IBM's Content Manager provides document management and workflow capabilities. It also provides the declare, search, retrieve functions, and records repository for this solution.

TeR v1.0 is a web-based RMA and provides the records management and access portions of the solution.

Page 28: IMPLEMENTING AN ELECTRONIC RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Philip C. Bantin Indiana University Archivist bantin@indiana.edu IU Electronic Records Program Website:

Dept. of Defense 5015.2 Standard

All of these products have been tested and certified as complaint with the DoD 5015.2 Standard for Recordkeeping Applications

http://jitc.fhu.disa.mil/recmgt/#standard

Page 29: IMPLEMENTING AN ELECTRONIC RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Philip C. Bantin Indiana University Archivist bantin@indiana.edu IU Electronic Records Program Website:

Systems Design Systems Development Lifecycle

System concept: purpose, goals, scope Analysis: user/functional requirements Design

data design: what information? software design: processed how? interface design: user interaction?

Coding and testing: execute & evaluate Key issue: Systems do (only) what

they’re designed to – purpose, goals, scope, requirements.