implementing a successful health information technology (hit) program through hrsa
DESCRIPTION
Implementing a Successful Health Information Technology (HIT) Program Through HRSA. Presenter: Harold “Brownie” Brown – Alabama Office of Rural Health. Overview. Project Background The Grant & Subgrant Vendor Selection Program Management System Development & Implementation - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Implementing a Successful Health Information Technology (HIT) Program Through HRSA
Presenter:
Harold “Brownie” Brown –
Alabama Office of Rural Health
2
Overview
Project Background The Grant & Subgrant Vendor Selection Program Management System Development & Implementation Operational Components Issues and Lessons Learned
3
Project Background
HRSA Announcement FLEX HIT Application
Tight Timing $24M, with 15 awardees 18 month performance period Limited to FLEX states Required network with CAH & tertiary hospital Focus on CVD and Diabetes Prevention
4
Project Background (Cont’d)
Subgrantee Selection Process CAHs solicited Selected Randolph Medical Center
Heavily invested in high tech scanner Located in high CVD mortality area Poised to act
Application developed by team SORH RMC
5
CHC Locations
Map where 3 CAHs located
Red Bay Hospital
Randolph Medical Center
Washington County Hospital
6
Health Indicators
Heart Diseases Mortality Rates for 2003-2005U.S., Alabama, Alabama Rural Action Commission Districts, and Special Regions In Alabama
289.8
364.1
273.9
300.9
339.9
247.8
264.2
266.9
290.5
230.1
285.4
330.0
366.0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Rate
Notes: Data provided by the Center for Health Statistics, Alabama Department of Public Health and the National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. U.S. rate is for 2004. Rates are per 100,000 population.
United States
Alabama
Alabama Rural Action Commission Districts
North Alabama
West Alabama
Central Alabama
East Alabama
South CentralAlabama
Tombigbee
Wiregrass
SouthwestAlabama
Black BeltAction Comm.
Special Regions
AppalachianRegion
Delta Region
7
Heart Diseases Mortality Rates U.S. Alabama, and the East Alabama Action Commission Counties, 2003-2005
322.3
352.4
389.3
363.3
294.5
432.3
305.4
394.6
285.4
230.1
366.0
362.1
385.5
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
Rate
Notes: Data provided by the Center for Health Statistics, Alabama Department of Public Health and the National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. U.S. rate is for 2004. Rates are per 100,000 population.
Coosa Co.
Etowah Co.
Randolph Co.
Talladega Co.
Tallapoosa Co.
East AlabamaAction Comm.
Calhoun Co.
Cherokee Co.
Chambers Co.
Clay Co.
Cleburne Co.
Alabama
United States
8
RMC’s Investment
9
The Grant
The Grant Award 16th awardee Piecemeal awards $1.2M vs. $1.6 Delayed start Project phases
10
Why was our HIT application successful?
Teamwork: SORH, RMC & Others Unique combination of talent Project designed in severable pieces Huge financial commitment by RMC Self-evaluation by ‘Murder Board’ Proposal conveyed great health need
11
The Grant & Subgrant (Cont’d)
The Subgrant Award Based on project phases
EHR for RMC Data link Quality data & tracking
Feb 2009 completion date Payment tied to milestones & holdback Progress reviews
12
Vendor Selection
RMC attended vendor expo Consultant employed RFI to determine vendor interest RFP to solicit proposals Vendor demos required Hospital selection team
Heavy clinical emphasis Robust discussions
13
Vendor Selection (Cont’d)
Shrewd negotiations Outcome
Awardee: Dairyland, now Healthland Award factors:
Most favored functionality Best overall value Highly responsive Committed to schedule
14
Vendor Selection (Cont’d)
Second Award To Sci-Health For Phase 3: Quality Data & Interface Real time interface vs. data warehouse Based on price & functionality
Other Awards For miscellaneous requirements; e.g.
Wiring Tertiary interface (New Age Systems)
15
Program Management
Developed Project Review Team SORH program mgr Medical school tech reps AL Quality Assurance Foundation (AQAF) AL Primary Healthcare Association AL Dept of Public Health (Legal, Financial,
Technical, Cardiovascular & Others) Periodic reviews
16
Program Management (Cont’d)
HRSA Reviews Monthly reports and teleconferences Site visits Contractor evaluation (Alterum)
Quarterly calls Site visits In-depth interviews
SORH Project Manager Reviews Monitor payments vs. progress Site visits
17
The View From RMC
The Work Plan Vendors & roles Phases & milestones Project tracking charts Key accomplishments
Descriptions Pictures
System Structure & Functions Issues & Lessons Learned
18
Other Financing
FCC Broadband Project Small Rural Provider Quality Program Network Development USDA Equipment Loan Small Hospital Improvement Program (SHIP) FLEX
19
TRACKS
TRACK 1-EHR System Selection and Implementation at RMCTRACK 1-EHR System Selection and Implementation at RMC: All the steps required to bring RMC’s current H.I.T. up to state of the art standards. This TRACK is required so that RMC is capable of electronically sharing data among the project organizations.
TRACK 2-Point of Care Data Links Across All EntitiesTRACK 2-Point of Care Data Links Across All Entities: All the steps required to electronically link the project organizations clinical data systems. This TRACK is a departure from the original grant application which called for a shared data repository. Given the reduction in grant funds and the complexity of building and maintaining a shared data warehouse it was determined that a more elegant solution would be to simply provide links to the source systems and make these links available at each participating organization. These links are aimed at providing physicians in the ER and clinics with up to date data to improve point of care decisions.
20
TRACKS (cont’d)
TRACK 3-Performance ReportingTRACK 3-Performance Reporting: All the steps required to identify data elements necessary to monitor progress towards improving cardiovascular disease. The concept is that each month, each organization will download discrete data files pertaining to select patients. These data files will be loaded into a rudimentary data base for sorting, trending and analysis. It is during this TRACK that the data elements are defined, the download protocols are established and the database to house the information is built. This TRACK does not require automated data interfaces. It does not require real time feeds. As a result the technical scope is greatly reduced and well as the cost.
TRACK 4-Targeted InterventionTRACK 4-Targeted Intervention: All the steps required to implement direct patient intervention to improve patient disease care compliance.
21
Choose Vendor
Randolph Medical Center went through and exhaustive list of vendors. We found the one that best suited our needs was Dairyland Healthcare Solutions. They have recently gone through a name change to Healthland.
22
Phase One
General Ledger Accounts Payable Payroll Human Resources/Personnel Materials Management Health Information Management Release of Information Quality Assurance/Utilization Review Electronic Remittance Advice Eligibility Verification Forms Express Scanning Pharmacy
23
Phase Two
Enterprise Scheduling Physician Practice Mangement Patient Care Guidelines Clinical Information
Order Entry Laboratory Transcription Radiology Therapies Dietary Patient Care Instructions Clinical Scanning
24
Phase Three Clinical Documentation Online Medication Administration Record Bar Coded Medication Administration Physician Access Physician Practice Documentation Surgery Management
25
DHS Application Data Flow
26
TRACK 1-RMC EHR
Key AccomplishmentsKey Accomplishments
EHR Vendor Selected
System Infrastructure Installed
Hardware Delivered
Training Room Build-Out Underway
Financial System Conversion Begun
Pharmacy Conversion Begun
27
TRACK 2-POINT OF CARE LINKS
Key AccomplishmentsKey Accomplishments
Regulatory Issues Addressed
Medical Staff Issues Addressed
Patient Consent Issues Addressed
Vendor Contracted
Work Begun
28
TRACK 3-PERFORMANCE REPORTING
Key AccomplishmentsKey Accomplishments
Vendor Selected
Hardware Installed
Software Installed
Build Out Scheduled
Alternative Funds Secured
29
TRACK 4-TARGETED INTERVENTIONS
Key AccomplishmentsKey Accomplishments
ALTERNATIVE FUNDS FOUND
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
Other Vendors Used Valiant Technologies IT consulting resource
The Analytical Resources Group Data Tracking Resource Dixie Heating and A/C AC for new Server room CDW Misc wiring, connectors,
cords Staples Computer monitors
Office Depot Chairs & desks training room
Columbus Fire and Safety Fire suppression - server room
39
Other Vendors Used (Cont’d)
Pro-advantage Network switches
Telecom, Inc. CAT 5 wiring
Innovative Workflow Tech S/W & H/W for interface with EAMC
HIS Workup Evaluation of system for trackable outcomes
Scihealth Communication between EAMC and RMC
Healthland Main software vendor
40
Built a system that allows us to view patient information from our tertiary hospital. Designed to allow doctors to view patients that live in local zip codes. If the patient presents and says they were recently at the tertiary we can quickly see everything that happened to them at that location.
Special Vendor – New Age System
41
Randolph & EAMC
Patient presents to Randolph ED Randolph ED doc authenticates into EAMC
Clinician Access Certifies has patient authorization; searches
for patient in CA. If exact match in CA, AND patient lives in a
Randolph County zip code, then patient clinical data menu displays.
42
Clinician Access
Lab results Radiology reports Transcribed documents:
H&P’s, consults, operative reports, discharge summaries
Cardiology reports Medications Orders
43
Security
Authorized access: Role based (i.e. “Randolph role”):
Exact match search: name, dob, sex Limit access to only patients living in Randolph
zip codes Access to clinical data only (not demographic)
Certify that patient or legal rep authorization has been obtained.
Complete audit trail of Randolph access
44
Reports
Audit trail, logs for each access: Date/time of access User Patient Data types
Utilization statistics report: # patients accessed # users accessing the system # hits by data type
45
Issues & Lessons Learned Pharmacy Conversion Financial challenge Schedule Get key staff involved from day one Stay focused on what works for your facility
specifically Keep a positive outlook at the top and display it to all
below Reinforce a positive attitude every day
46
Issues & Lesson Learned (Cont’d)
Choose partners based on dependability Look for recurring costs when you buy the software;
i.e., fees every year you use the software Identify hardware need and order it early Anything done by contract (running wires, building
infrastructure, etc.) will probably take longer than planned
Make sure your key players are on board and supportive
47
Contacts
Harold BrownProject Manager, AL Office of Rural HealthPh. 334-206-5430Email: [email protected]
Michael TipswordDirector Strategic Development, Randolph Medical CenterPh. 334-863-4111, Ext [email protected]
48
Questions????