impact of cc_bala and ravindranath

Upload: swathidaruri

Post on 30-May-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/9/2019 Impact of CC_Bala and Ravindranath

    1/12

    Prof. G. BalaProf. Ravindranath

    R. Chaturvedi, R. Gopalakrishnan, M. Jayaraman,S.Swarnim, N. Sharma and S. Afreen

    Indian Institute of Science,Bangalore

  • 8/9/2019 Impact of CC_Bala and Ravindranath

    2/12

    Impacts of Climate Change &

    Vulnerability of ForestEcosystems IPCC, 2007 Findings

    1. Populations of threatened species are expected to beat greater risk Species that are currently classified as critically endangered will become

    extinct 1/3 to 2/3 species at risk of extinction

    Loss of biodiversity2. Species composition and dominance will be altered,

    resulting in ecosystem changes

    3. Shifts in forest types boundary Altitude & Latitude

    4. Forest die-back / mortality Climate will change faster than capacity of plants to migrate

    5. Increase and later decrease in biomass productivity

  • 8/9/2019 Impact of CC_Bala and Ravindranath

    3/12

    Studies by IISc Assessed climate impacts on forest ecosystems

    Area under different forest types plant functional types Net Primary Productivity

    Emissions Scenarios: SRES A2 and B2

    Climate model projections HadRM3 (from IITM,

    Pune) Global Vegetation Models used

    BIOME4 & IBIS ( Integrated Biosphere Simulator)

    Status of work Preliminary modeling results available at national level for

    the period 2070 to 2100 Awaiting climate projections for 2030 and 2050 to make

    projections for short and medium term

  • 8/9/2019 Impact of CC_Bala and Ravindranath

    4/12

    National level results fromIBIS modeling

    For A2 scenario, Indian terrestrial ecosystems

    take up about 15 Gt-C by the end of the century

    Natural potential vegetation map shows 35 %

    increase in forest cover primarily because ofCO2-fertilization (In the absence of CO2-

    fertilization forest cover decreases by 15%)

    Indian terrestrial ecosystem will take up 16 % ofthe total emissions (94 Gt-C) from India

    projected for A2 scenario

  • 8/9/2019 Impact of CC_Bala and Ravindranath

    5/12

    Impact on Forest cover (1975 -

    2085) IBIS (A2 scenario) Modeloutputs

    Climatic effect(warming)decreases the

    forest cover by15%

    Climate effect plusCO2-fertilizationenhances theforest cover by

    35%

  • 8/9/2019 Impact of CC_Bala and Ravindranath

    6/12

    Impact on NPP (1975 - 2085)

    IBIS (A2 scenario) Model outputs

    Climatic effect(warming) decreasesNet Primary

    Productivity (NPP)by 13 %

    CO2-fertilizationenhances NPP by

    82%

  • 8/9/2019 Impact of CC_Bala and Ravindranath

    7/12

    Impact on vegetation type (% change)

    according to Champion and Sethclassification during the period 1960-

    1990 to 2070-2100 (A2 Scenario)

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

    Tropical wet evergreen forests

    Tropical moist decidious forest

    Tropical thorny/scrub forests

    Littoral and swampy forest

    Subtropical pine forests

    Montane wet temperate forests

    Himalayan dry temperate forests

    Moist alpineB2 A2

  • 8/9/2019 Impact of CC_Bala and Ravindranath

    8/12

    Impac

    tof

    climat

    echa

    ngeo

    soil

    carbo

    nstoc

    k(A2

    and

    scena

    rios)

    0 510

    15

    20

    25

    Tropical wet evergreen forests

    Tropical semi evergreen forests

    Tropical moist decidious forest

    Tropical dry decidious forest

    Tropical thorny/scrub forests

    Tropical dry evergreen forest

    Littoral and swampy forest

    Subtropical broad -leaved hill forests

    Subtropical pine forests

    Sub-tropical dry evergreen forests

    Montane wet temperate forests

    Himalayan wet/ moist temperate

    forests

    Himalayan dry temperate forests

    SOC (in Kg/m2)

    Bas

    eline

    2085_

  • 8/9/2019 Impact of CC_Bala and Ravindranath

    9/12

    Impact on NPP (% change) according

    to Champion and Seth classificationduring the period 1960-1990 to 2070-

    2100 (A2 and B2 scenarios)

    -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

    Tropical wet evergreen forests

    Tropical moist decidious forest

    Tropical thorny/scrub forests

    Littoral and swampy forest

    Subtropical pine forests

    Montane wet temperate forests

    Himalayan dry temperate forests

    Moist alpine B2 A2

  • 8/9/2019 Impact of CC_Bala and Ravindranath

    10/12

    Impact of Climate Change on Pine,Teak and Sal (A2 scenario)

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    2025 2055 2085

    %gr

    idundergoingchange

    Sal Teak Pine

    Sal forests are relatively resilient compared to Teak and

    Pine; Thus a good candidate for forest Conservation and

    natural Regeneration projects.

  • 8/9/2019 Impact of CC_Bala and Ravindranath

    11/12

    Biodiversity and NPP

    Implications

    IBIS model outputs indicate 52% forested grids

    will be impacted Future climate is not optimal for the existing forest

    types or species assemblage or biodiversity

    Though models indicate forests benefiting fromCO2 elevation (due to CO2 fertilization) Tropical forests are generally poor in nitrogen and

    other nutrients - thus may not benefit from elevated

    CO2 Biodiversity likely to be adversely impacted

    since the future climate may not be suitable for

    existing vegetation types

  • 8/9/2019 Impact of CC_Bala and Ravindranath

    12/12

    Future plans

    Climate change in near

    term

    Preliminary modeling resultsavailable at national level for

    the period 2070 to 2100

    Awaiting climate projections

    for 2030 and 2050 to make

    projections for short and

    medium term

    Vulnerability index maps(based on veg change,

    type and thickness of veg)