il rimodellamento cromatinico: agenti inibitori dell’istone … · corso nazionale di...
TRANSCRIPT
Corso Nazionale di AggiornamentoIn Ematologia Clinica
Milano 28-29 Maggio 2007
Il rimodellamento cromatinico:agenti inibitori dell’istone deacetilasi e demetilanti
PG Pelicci
Upstream signals:
Enzyme-catalyzed (HDAC, HAT, HMT, DNMT)chromatin modifications(permanent or transient)
Regulation of transcription, replication,
Genome stability
Chromatin regulates all genome functions
Chromatin alterations
in cancer cells
• aberrant chromatin recruitment of HDACs byoncogenic fusion proteins (PML-RAR, PLZF-RAR,
AML1-ETO, TEL-AML1, Bcl6)
• missense mutations, rearrangements orinactivation of CBP or p300 (HATs) byoncogenic viral proteins
• DNA methylation at promoters of tumorsuppressors
• Over-expression or mutations of HMTs
Consequences: Abnormal transcriptional regulation oftarget genes that are relevant to the transformation process.
Chromatin “enzymes”
might represent
targets for the development of novel
anti-cancer drugs
Ongoing: HDAC-inhibitorsDemethylating agents
Pipeline: HMT-inhibitors/agonistsHist. demethylase inhib./agonists
Relevant features of HDAC-inhibitors
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
1 2 3 4
+ HDACi
Breast cr.
0
10
30
50
1 2 3 4
Lung cr.
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
Colon cr.
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Broad anti-tumoractivity
Poor systemictoxicity
Adaptedfrom Blood,2002
Phase I-II clinical trialswith HDAC inhibitors:• modest systemic toxicity• clinical efficacy
Minucci S and Pelicci PG (2006)
Summary of the main clinical studies
using histone deacetylase inhibitors
Understand the molecular mechanismsunderlying the anti-tumor activities of HDACi
PatientStratification
Better drugs
• PML-RAR binds DNA and recruits
chromatin enzymes to target promoters
(HDAC, HMT, DNMT)
• Complex formation is critical
to all PML-RAR biological activities
• HDACs, HMTs, DNMTs all contribute
to PML-RAR functions
• PML-RAR induces heterochromatin
at target promoters
and transcriptional silencing
HDAC
Dnmt
PML
RAR
R A R E
SUVR
MBDs
HP1HP1
Dnmt
HDAC
HMT
MBDs
N-CoR
HDAC
Dnmt
PML
RAR
R A R E
MBDs
The APL model:
Epigenetic drugs(HDAC-inhibitors [VPA] anddemethylating agents [DAC])
enhance survival of APL mice
0,0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
1,0
Alive
Mic
e
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Days after leukemia injection
PBS
DAC
VPA
VPA+DAC
p = 0,0045
p < 0,0045
p < 0,0001
Effects of HDAC-inhibitors (VPA):Placebo
VPA
TUNELH-E
2. Massive apoptosis only in the APL mice
1. Histone acetylation in both APL and Healthy mice
Ctrl
acetyl-H3
Healthy APL
H3
VPA
TSA
VPA
Ctrl
TSA
BM Spleen
Placebo
VPA
TUNEL H-E
Tumour-selective action of HDACi in acute promyelocytic leukaemia.
HDAC-inhibitors do not alleviatethe inhibitory effect of PML-RAR on transcription
and differentiation
Normalized RAR-expression
2
1
0
Basal
+ PML-RAR
+VPA
+RA
+ Deaza
% Differentiation
80
20
0
Ctrl + PML-RAR
+VPA
+RA
+ Deaza40
60
Cyt- + - + ++ +
CBP/
p300
PML
p53
PML-RAR
HDAC
Alternative mechanisms: p53 activation:
p53 acetylation (and activity)is inhibited by PML-RAR
HDACi do not target p53 in APLs
Cu
m.
Su
rviv
al
0
.2
.4
.6
.8
1
0 5 10 15 20 25 30Time (days)
VPA
p<.0001
VPAPlacebo
Mechanisms of HDACi-induced apoptosis in APLs
IFOM-IEO campus
Milan, Italy
High-order chromatin changesinduced by PML-RAR
Ivan Dellino
Martin FalkMatteo CesaroniLucilla Luzi
Gabriele Bucci Stanislav Kozubek
Emily Lukasova
Saverio Minucci
IEO,Milan
Institute of BiophysicsAcademy of Science, Brno
U937 cells:
+5
+4
+3
+2
1
-2
-3
-4
-5
U937 - Mt
U937- PR
U937-A1E
U937-PZR
CD34+
t(15;17)
t(8;21)
Inv(16)
expression
Cell Cell lineslines
Patients Patients (pools of 10 (pools of 10 individuals)individuals)
{{
+5
+4
+3
+2
1
-2
-3
-4
-5
U937 - Mt
U937- PR
U937-A1E
U937-PZR
CD34+
t(15;17)
t(8;21)
Inv(16)
expression
Cell Cell lineslines
Patients Patients (pools of 10 (pools of 10 individuals)individuals)
{{
Patients:
Analysis of PML/RAR transcriptional targets
using gene chip technology
- 1206 gene down-regulated by PML-RAR- Validation: approx. 90%- Only a minority of regulated genes contains bona fide RAREs in their promoter region
#1-2 #3,4 #5 #6 #9-10#7,8 #11 #13#12 #14 #16,17#15
Chr. 19
Gene Clusters
Chr. 12
#1 #2 #7#3-6 #8#1 #2 #7#3-6 #8
Gene Clusters
#1
Chr. 13
Gene Clusters
Clusters of PML-RAR - down-regulated genes(Chromosomes 19, 12 and 13)
#1-2 #3,4 #5 #6 #9-10#7,8 #11 #13#12 #14 #16,17#15
Chr. 19
Gene Clusters
#2#1 #3
Gene Clusters
Chr. 19p13.3 Clusters #1-3 (700-3000 Kb)
Physical map of Chrom. 19 Cluster #1 of PML-RAR - down-regulated genes
Chr.19 Cluster #1 (535 kb; 21 genes)
PML/RAR binds to TSSs of all regulated Cluster #1 genes
RARE clusters coincide with clusters of Alu repeat sequences
Each DR2-RARE sequence is located within one Alu repeat elements
DR2-RARE
Cluster #1 genes are flanked by clusters of RAREs
Alu-RARE
Clusters
Alu-RARE Clusters
#1-2 #3,4 #5 #6 #9-10#7,8 #11 #13#12 #14 #16,17#15
Chr. 19Gene
Clusters
Chr. 12
#1 #2 #7#3-6 #8#1 #2 #7#3-6 #8
Gene Clusters
Alu-RARE
Clusters
#1
Chr. 13Gene
Clusters
Alu-RARE Clusters
Alu-RARE Clusters
Alu-RAREs are distributed as clusters that are located in the proximity of clusters of PML-RAR regulated genes
PML-RAR binds Alu-RAREs
PML-RAR binding toThe Ya5 Alu-subfamily
PML-RAR binding toIndividual Alu-RAREswithin Chr.19 Cluster #1
1. 50% of PML-RAR - down-regulated genes are clustered in the genome
Regulated genes
Conclusions (1):
3. Alu-RAREs bind PML/RAR
2. Clustered genes:
- do not contain RAREs in their proximal promoter
Alu-RARE cluster Alu-RARE cluster
- are flanked by clustered Alu-RAREs
- bind PML/RAR at their TSS
• How is PML-RAR recruited to TSS?• Is PML-RAR first recruited to Alu-RAREs, and, from there, to TSSs (RAR interacts with TFIIH)• Does PML/RAR expression triggers juxtaposition of Alu-RAREs and the TSS regionsof regulated genes?
ELA2 gene - A1 Alu-RARE (370 Kb)
5’ HA-1 gene - A1 Alu-RARE (150 kb)
A1/A2 Alu-RARE (130 Kb)
3’ HA-1 gene - A1 Alu-RARE (145 kb)
ELA2 gene - A2 Alu-RARE (500Kb)
5’ HA-1 gene - A2 Alu-RARE (280 kb)
3’ HA-1 gene - A2 Alu-RARE (275 kb)
ELA2 gene - 5’ H1 gene (210 Kb)
3C-capturedfragments
3C-negativefragments
Analysis of long-range intrachromosomal interactionsby the chromosome conformation capture (3C) technology
Chr. 19
Chr. 13
Chr. 12
#1 #2 #7#3-6 #8
#1
#1-2 #3,4 #5 #6 #9-10#7,8 #11 #13#12 #14 #16,17#15
Gene Clusters
Gene Clusters
Gene Clusters
3D-FISH DNA probes: 1-2 Mb Probe BProbe A
PML-RAR induces shortening (up to 25%) of the distance between Two DNA probes flanking Regulated Gene Alu-RARE Clusters
- + PR - + PR + PR
Control + PML-RAR + RA
Chr. 19 Chr. 12Chr. 12
Expression of PML-RAR induces:
• changes in higher-order chromatin structure (juxtaposition of Alu-RAREs and the TSS regions of regulated genes)
• transcriptional repression of neighbouring clustered genes
Alu cluster
Alu cluster
Conclusions (2):
TSA revert the effectsOf PML-RAR on high order-chromatin structure
Chr. 19 Chr. 12Chr. 12
PML-RAR + RA + TSA
TSA induces acetylation at TSSs of clustered genesAnd increases Pol II recruitment
0,000
0,020
0,040
0,060
0,080
0,100
0,120
0,140
0,160
0,180
0,200
HA-1 Alu 1135 STK11 ATP5D MIDN Int K7
Polymerase II
H3 AcK14
0,000
0,500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
AZU1 HA-1 Alu K0 STK11 ATP5D MIDN CIRBP Int K7 RARbeta1135
Understand the molecular mechanismsunderlying the anti-tumor activities of HDACi
PatientStratification
Better drugs
Class A:“Hypo-acetylated”
Breast cancer
Class B:“Hyperacetylated”
Breast cancer
“Hyper-acetylated”
Breast normaltissue
N
T
T
N
A fraction of Breast Cancer Samples show “global hypo-acetylation” of chromatin
class A:
“hypoacetylated” tumors
class B:
“hyperacetylated tumors”
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
VPA TSAC
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
C VPA TSA
“Hypoacetylated” tumors
are sensitive to HDAC-inhibitors
MSCV
MTA1
HDAC2
HDAC1
H4-Ac
1 week
TSA
MSCV MTA1 HDAC2 HDAC1TSA: - + + +- + - -
Overexpression of HDACs or MTA1 in the resistant cellsinduces histone-hypoacetylation and sensitivityto the apoptogenic effect of HDACi
Understand the molecular mechanismsunderlying the anti-tumor activities of HDACi
PatientStratification
Better drugs
Different in vitro potency of different HDACi
24 48 720
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55Vehicle
DAC-60 1 μM
DAC-60 3 μM
% sub G1 population in K562 celll line
SAHA 3 μM
Hours
%S
ub
G1
po
pu
lati
on
% Sub G1 population in HCT-116 cell line
24 48 720
5
10
15
20
25
30
35Vehicle
DAC-60 1μM
DAC-60 3μM
SAHA 3μM
Hours
% S
ub
G1
po
pu
lati
on
Company confidential
In vivo efficacy in papilloma induced mouse model
0 1 2 3 4 50
1
2
3
4
5Vehicle
SAHA
Dac-60
Weeks
Incre
men
t p
ap
illo
ma n
um
ber
In vivo efficay in papilloma induced mouse model
0 1 2 3 4 50
1
2
3
4
5Vehicle
VPA
Dac-60
Weeks
Icre
men
t p
ap
illo
ma n
um
ber
VehicleVPA DAC-60
Company confidential
Different in vivo potency of different HDACi