iir network optimisation 2005 dickey
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey
1/38
Sergey Dickey, PCTEL RF Solutions GroupContributed to by Niallo Carrol, PCTEL Antenna Products Group
Using Measured Data and iVET toImprove Planning & Optimization
-
7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey
2/38
Agenda
Evolution of Optimization: Getting Physical
Co-channel Interference: Ever More Ubiquitous
RET Antennae
Ways and Means of Optimization: Tools
Measurement versus Prediction: PMO
Importance of Measurement Dynamic Range: Case Study
Closing the (Control) Loop: High-Dynamic-Range Dual-
Technology Measurement Instruments
Using Measured Data and iVET toImprove Planning & Optimization
-
7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey
3/38
-
7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey
4/38
Optimization is
Mobile Network Operators currently install asmuch as 30% more infrastructure than isrequired
Network adjustments are necessary inresponse to subscriber density changes
Experience to date suggests that clusters of
sites need to be adjusted between 3 to 7times in the course of a deployment
(Source: Sigma Wireless)
-
7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey
5/38
2G 3G+: Interrelated Trends
Rising importance of co-channel interferenceDenser GSM networks in citiesFew or single frequency channel for the use by all sectorsInherent CCI in W-CDMA-based networks; pilot pollution
Breathing cells in W-CDMA
Fewer free network parameters used in optimization in 3G and3G+ systems
No frequency plans to optimizeTx power not dynamically controlled in HSDPA
Network performance is more difficult to predict due to the
complexity and dynamic behaviorDynamic link adaptation
Multiple traffic modes and QoS
-
7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey
6/38
Co-channel Interference: OftenUnderappreciated
-
7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey
7/38
Co-channel Interference: OftenUnderappreciated
-
7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey
8/38
Co-channel Interference: Example
-
7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey
9/38
E.g., One Sector Kills Another byShooting Him/Her in the Back:
-
7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey
10/38
Three overlapping co-channel sites
-
7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey
11/38
Antenna Physical ArrangementBecomes Critical for Optimization
Tilt:the one most important parameterleft to optimize
Azimuth: less important and probablyaffected by the future introduction ofintelligent antennae
Tilt changes are notoriously expensiveto implement, unless
-
7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey
12/38
One Uses Antennae with RemoteElectrical Tilt
METS (Manual Electrical Tilt antennas)RETS (Remote Electrical Tilt)
Next stage, Networked Remote TiltAdjustment
Tilt adjustments are made over the Operation &
Management system or over a separate network layersuch as Sigma Wirelesss (now part of PCTEL Antenna
Products Group) Blustream system.
-
7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey
13/38
RuralNo buildings, coverage is easy to predict
UrbanBuildings cause interference leading to blindspots, optimization is required
Optimization
Consists of changing the tilt of theAntenna to redirect its beam
Congestion IncreaseSubscriber density increases leading tocongestion
CapacityAdding a new Base Station requires neighboringcells to be adjusted
3G Need For Antenna Adjustments3G Need For Antenna Adjustments
-
7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey
14/38
Patented Phase-shifter with closed loopcontrol system
Robust Slide Mechanism
Greater accuracy
Factory installed software settings
Superior Pattern ControlEssential for UMTS optimization
Antenna Interface Standards Group(AISG) and Ericsson-CompliantController
The iVETThe iVET ComponentsComponentsRemote Tilt as StandardiVET Antenna
Phase-Shifter
Microstrip Track
SlidingDielectric
OpticalSensor
Motor
Controller
Side Lobes Suppressed
Side Lobes
Main Beam 0 Tilt Main Beam 8 Tilt
-
7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey
15/38
Traditional Approach to OptimizationAdjust or
Replace Antennas with Differing Tilt Angles
Alternative: Remote Tilt (iVET):
One Antenna, ROI after the second tilt change!
Lost revenue due to delays
Expense of replacement antenna
Site Access logistics
Lose coverage during swap out
Rigging and logistics expensesRisk of getting it wrong
Why iVETWhy iVET for UMTSfor UMTS
Early Deployment Urban Buildout Increased Congestion
-
7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey
16/38
Frequency Bands : DCS, PCS andUMTS
Optimized Singleband
65or 33options
integrated Variable Electrical Tilt(iVET)
18dBi model at 1.3m
18.4dBi model at 1.5m
19dBi model at 1.7m
Minimum Visual Impact
Antenna only with iVET
Macrocell Variable TiltMacrocell Variable Tilt
Integrated Mast
Head Amplifier (MHA)
Fusion
-
7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey
17/38
Remote Access Tilt ControlRemote Access Tilt Controland Optimizationand Optimization
-
7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey
18/38
Tools of the Trade: Closing theLoop
Propagation ModelingCoverage and InterferenceMeasurements:
Drive Testing
Mobile measurements
Switch StatisticsAutomatic Cell Planning Tools
-
7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey
19/38
Propagation Model orMeasurement: Both, actually (1)
Macro Models --Continuous functions suitable foroptimization, no gaps in coverage
Fast and easy to useVery inaccurate, unless calibrated bymeasurements
Ray-tracing Models accurate, but slowand expensive
-
7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey
20/38
-
7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey
21/38
Propagation Model orMeasurement: Both, actually (3)
Propagation Model orMeasurement: Both, actually (3)
High accuracy
Fast
High dynamic range(Clarify)
Precise location info
But
Need to drive
Scanner and ClarifyRM
Measurements:
-
7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey
22/38
Are the measurementsdispensable? -- NO
Any engineering system requires being tested andcalibrated periodically; one cannot rely on
predictions only without doing test and
measurement
Drive Test is an important tool of the optimization engineer:
Network audit
Model calibration
Troubleshooting
One of the inputs to ACP
-
7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey
23/38
Why is Propagation ModelOptimization a Laborious and
Expensive Process?
Usually the data are gathered using theso-called CW measurement. Itrequires switching sites on and off
(keying up); every sector is drivenseparately
Because of the overwhelming expense,only a few sectors are used forcalibration; accuracy suffers
-
7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey
24/38
Evolution of Optimization: Getting Physical
Co-channel Interference: Ever More Ubiquitous
RET Antennae
Ways and Means of Optimization: Tools
Measurement versus Prediction: PMO
Importance of Measurement Dynamic Range: Case Study
Closing the (Control) Loop: High-Dynamic-Range Dual-
Technology Measurement Instruments
Using Measured Data and iVET toImprove Planning & Optimization
-
7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey
25/38
Dynamic Range Requirements
CPICH 1 CPICH 2
Rx Pwr
[dBm]DynamicRange
DynamicRange
Pilot Power [dBm]of CPICH1 Pilot Power [dBm]
of CPICH2cannot be detected
EC/Io
-
7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey
26/38
Deleterious Effects of Limited Dynamic
Range of a Measurement Instrument:
Limited area where measurements areavailable
Positive bias of averaged (binned)measurements on the edges of a cell,even when points are present
-
7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey
27/38
Deleterious Effects of Limited DynamicRange of a Measurement Instrument:
-
7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey
28/38
Field Study: Comparison of CW datawith Scanner and Clarify for PMO
Two sets of drive-test data obtained with a Clarifymeasurement system (GSM version; -18 dB min C/ID.R.) a) taken in a clear-channel condition; b) withthe normal co-channel interference
Suburban area with flat terrainSlope-and-intercept (Lee) model used
Compared with the model produced by a standardscanner (0 dB min C/I)
-
7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey
29/38
Study (continued)
Linear regression was used for fitting binned data
to the model
-
7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey
30/38
Circular Binning:
-
7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey
31/38
Gray: Scanner; Brown: Clarify; Red/pink: clear channel (CW)
-
7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey
32/38
Results (1): Comparison between CW and
Clarify
-
7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey
33/38
Results (2): Comparison between Clarify
and scanners
-
7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey
34/38
-
7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey
35/38
Dual Network OperationsChallenges: Plan and manage inter-network handoff zones
Identifying where WCDMA handoff will betriggeredUnderstanding detail of underlay GSM networkManage parameters to move handoffs to desirable
locations
Solution: WCDMA/GSM Measured DataInter technology neighbor list planning and
managementWCDMA data identifies WCDMA handover zoneGSM provides detail of the GSM network andneighbors in that zone
-
7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey
36/38
Dual Network Operations
Challenges: Sharing infrastructureCross optimization of shared antenna sites
Interference management
Solution: WCDMA/GSM Data enableTo more accurately predict impact of antenna tiltsand changes
See the propagation from multiple sitesIdentify sources of inter-network interference
-
7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey
37/38
Conclusion
Using high dynamic range data in planning
and optimization solutions enhances resultsPropagation and resulting interference areissues in both WCDMA and GSM
CLARIFY
delivers CW-like Data with afraction of the effort
Collecting WCDMA/GSM datasimultaneously enables management of bothnetworks in a unified manner
-
7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey
38/38
Thank You
www.pctel.com