iir network optimisation 2005 dickey

Upload: suckmymember

Post on 05-Apr-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey

    1/38

    Sergey Dickey, PCTEL RF Solutions GroupContributed to by Niallo Carrol, PCTEL Antenna Products Group

    [email protected]

    Using Measured Data and iVET toImprove Planning & Optimization

  • 7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey

    2/38

    Agenda

    Evolution of Optimization: Getting Physical

    Co-channel Interference: Ever More Ubiquitous

    RET Antennae

    Ways and Means of Optimization: Tools

    Measurement versus Prediction: PMO

    Importance of Measurement Dynamic Range: Case Study

    Closing the (Control) Loop: High-Dynamic-Range Dual-

    Technology Measurement Instruments

    Using Measured Data and iVET toImprove Planning & Optimization

  • 7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey

    3/38

  • 7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey

    4/38

    Optimization is

    Mobile Network Operators currently install asmuch as 30% more infrastructure than isrequired

    Network adjustments are necessary inresponse to subscriber density changes

    Experience to date suggests that clusters of

    sites need to be adjusted between 3 to 7times in the course of a deployment

    (Source: Sigma Wireless)

  • 7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey

    5/38

    2G 3G+: Interrelated Trends

    Rising importance of co-channel interferenceDenser GSM networks in citiesFew or single frequency channel for the use by all sectorsInherent CCI in W-CDMA-based networks; pilot pollution

    Breathing cells in W-CDMA

    Fewer free network parameters used in optimization in 3G and3G+ systems

    No frequency plans to optimizeTx power not dynamically controlled in HSDPA

    Network performance is more difficult to predict due to the

    complexity and dynamic behaviorDynamic link adaptation

    Multiple traffic modes and QoS

  • 7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey

    6/38

    Co-channel Interference: OftenUnderappreciated

  • 7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey

    7/38

    Co-channel Interference: OftenUnderappreciated

  • 7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey

    8/38

    Co-channel Interference: Example

  • 7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey

    9/38

    E.g., One Sector Kills Another byShooting Him/Her in the Back:

  • 7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey

    10/38

    Three overlapping co-channel sites

  • 7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey

    11/38

    Antenna Physical ArrangementBecomes Critical for Optimization

    Tilt:the one most important parameterleft to optimize

    Azimuth: less important and probablyaffected by the future introduction ofintelligent antennae

    Tilt changes are notoriously expensiveto implement, unless

  • 7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey

    12/38

    One Uses Antennae with RemoteElectrical Tilt

    METS (Manual Electrical Tilt antennas)RETS (Remote Electrical Tilt)

    Next stage, Networked Remote TiltAdjustment

    Tilt adjustments are made over the Operation &

    Management system or over a separate network layersuch as Sigma Wirelesss (now part of PCTEL Antenna

    Products Group) Blustream system.

  • 7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey

    13/38

    RuralNo buildings, coverage is easy to predict

    UrbanBuildings cause interference leading to blindspots, optimization is required

    Optimization

    Consists of changing the tilt of theAntenna to redirect its beam

    Congestion IncreaseSubscriber density increases leading tocongestion

    CapacityAdding a new Base Station requires neighboringcells to be adjusted

    3G Need For Antenna Adjustments3G Need For Antenna Adjustments

  • 7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey

    14/38

    Patented Phase-shifter with closed loopcontrol system

    Robust Slide Mechanism

    Greater accuracy

    Factory installed software settings

    Superior Pattern ControlEssential for UMTS optimization

    Antenna Interface Standards Group(AISG) and Ericsson-CompliantController

    The iVETThe iVET ComponentsComponentsRemote Tilt as StandardiVET Antenna

    Phase-Shifter

    Microstrip Track

    SlidingDielectric

    OpticalSensor

    Motor

    Controller

    Side Lobes Suppressed

    Side Lobes

    Main Beam 0 Tilt Main Beam 8 Tilt

  • 7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey

    15/38

    Traditional Approach to OptimizationAdjust or

    Replace Antennas with Differing Tilt Angles

    Alternative: Remote Tilt (iVET):

    One Antenna, ROI after the second tilt change!

    Lost revenue due to delays

    Expense of replacement antenna

    Site Access logistics

    Lose coverage during swap out

    Rigging and logistics expensesRisk of getting it wrong

    Why iVETWhy iVET for UMTSfor UMTS

    Early Deployment Urban Buildout Increased Congestion

  • 7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey

    16/38

    Frequency Bands : DCS, PCS andUMTS

    Optimized Singleband

    65or 33options

    integrated Variable Electrical Tilt(iVET)

    18dBi model at 1.3m

    18.4dBi model at 1.5m

    19dBi model at 1.7m

    Minimum Visual Impact

    Antenna only with iVET

    Macrocell Variable TiltMacrocell Variable Tilt

    Integrated Mast

    Head Amplifier (MHA)

    Fusion

  • 7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey

    17/38

    Remote Access Tilt ControlRemote Access Tilt Controland Optimizationand Optimization

  • 7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey

    18/38

    Tools of the Trade: Closing theLoop

    Propagation ModelingCoverage and InterferenceMeasurements:

    Drive Testing

    Mobile measurements

    Switch StatisticsAutomatic Cell Planning Tools

  • 7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey

    19/38

    Propagation Model orMeasurement: Both, actually (1)

    Macro Models --Continuous functions suitable foroptimization, no gaps in coverage

    Fast and easy to useVery inaccurate, unless calibrated bymeasurements

    Ray-tracing Models accurate, but slowand expensive

  • 7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey

    20/38

  • 7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey

    21/38

    Propagation Model orMeasurement: Both, actually (3)

    Propagation Model orMeasurement: Both, actually (3)

    High accuracy

    Fast

    High dynamic range(Clarify)

    Precise location info

    But

    Need to drive

    Scanner and ClarifyRM

    Measurements:

  • 7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey

    22/38

    Are the measurementsdispensable? -- NO

    Any engineering system requires being tested andcalibrated periodically; one cannot rely on

    predictions only without doing test and

    measurement

    Drive Test is an important tool of the optimization engineer:

    Network audit

    Model calibration

    Troubleshooting

    One of the inputs to ACP

  • 7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey

    23/38

    Why is Propagation ModelOptimization a Laborious and

    Expensive Process?

    Usually the data are gathered using theso-called CW measurement. Itrequires switching sites on and off

    (keying up); every sector is drivenseparately

    Because of the overwhelming expense,only a few sectors are used forcalibration; accuracy suffers

  • 7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey

    24/38

    Evolution of Optimization: Getting Physical

    Co-channel Interference: Ever More Ubiquitous

    RET Antennae

    Ways and Means of Optimization: Tools

    Measurement versus Prediction: PMO

    Importance of Measurement Dynamic Range: Case Study

    Closing the (Control) Loop: High-Dynamic-Range Dual-

    Technology Measurement Instruments

    Using Measured Data and iVET toImprove Planning & Optimization

  • 7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey

    25/38

    Dynamic Range Requirements

    CPICH 1 CPICH 2

    Rx Pwr

    [dBm]DynamicRange

    DynamicRange

    Pilot Power [dBm]of CPICH1 Pilot Power [dBm]

    of CPICH2cannot be detected

    EC/Io

  • 7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey

    26/38

    Deleterious Effects of Limited Dynamic

    Range of a Measurement Instrument:

    Limited area where measurements areavailable

    Positive bias of averaged (binned)measurements on the edges of a cell,even when points are present

  • 7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey

    27/38

    Deleterious Effects of Limited DynamicRange of a Measurement Instrument:

  • 7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey

    28/38

    Field Study: Comparison of CW datawith Scanner and Clarify for PMO

    Two sets of drive-test data obtained with a Clarifymeasurement system (GSM version; -18 dB min C/ID.R.) a) taken in a clear-channel condition; b) withthe normal co-channel interference

    Suburban area with flat terrainSlope-and-intercept (Lee) model used

    Compared with the model produced by a standardscanner (0 dB min C/I)

  • 7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey

    29/38

    Study (continued)

    Linear regression was used for fitting binned data

    to the model

  • 7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey

    30/38

    Circular Binning:

  • 7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey

    31/38

    Gray: Scanner; Brown: Clarify; Red/pink: clear channel (CW)

  • 7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey

    32/38

    Results (1): Comparison between CW and

    Clarify

  • 7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey

    33/38

    Results (2): Comparison between Clarify

    and scanners

  • 7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey

    34/38

  • 7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey

    35/38

    Dual Network OperationsChallenges: Plan and manage inter-network handoff zones

    Identifying where WCDMA handoff will betriggeredUnderstanding detail of underlay GSM networkManage parameters to move handoffs to desirable

    locations

    Solution: WCDMA/GSM Measured DataInter technology neighbor list planning and

    managementWCDMA data identifies WCDMA handover zoneGSM provides detail of the GSM network andneighbors in that zone

  • 7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey

    36/38

    Dual Network Operations

    Challenges: Sharing infrastructureCross optimization of shared antenna sites

    Interference management

    Solution: WCDMA/GSM Data enableTo more accurately predict impact of antenna tiltsand changes

    See the propagation from multiple sitesIdentify sources of inter-network interference

  • 7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey

    37/38

    Conclusion

    Using high dynamic range data in planning

    and optimization solutions enhances resultsPropagation and resulting interference areissues in both WCDMA and GSM

    CLARIFY

    delivers CW-like Data with afraction of the effort

    Collecting WCDMA/GSM datasimultaneously enables management of bothnetworks in a unified manner

  • 7/31/2019 IIR Network Optimisation 2005 Dickey

    38/38

    Thank You

    www.pctel.com