igarss11_takaku_dsm_report.ppt
TRANSCRIPT
2011 IEEE International Geoscience & Remote Sensing Symposium
July 24–29, 2011 Vancouver, Canada
High Resolution DSM Generationfrom ALOS PRISM
- Archiving and Mosaicking -
Junichi TakakuRESTEC
July 2011
Takeo TadonoJAXA
22011 IEEE International Geoscience & Remote Sensing Symposium
Contents
Introduction Software overview Data archiving status DSM mosaic for global data set Summary
32011 IEEE International Geoscience & Remote Sensing Symposium
Introduction Panchromatic Remote-sensing Instrument for Stereo Mapping
(PRISM) onboard Advanced Land Observation Satellite (ALOS)– Mission Life: Jan.2006. – Apr.2011
– Three push-broom scanners, nadir, +23.8 ゚ & –23.8 ゚ for stereo triplets in 35km-swath.
– Pan images: 2.5 m, 8 bit.
© JAXA© JAXA
42011 IEEE International Geoscience & Remote Sensing Symposium
Introduction Digital Surface Model (DSM) generation from ALOS PRISM
– with DOGS-AP (DSM and Ortho-rectified image Generation Software for ALOS PRISM) – JAXA’s exclusive triplet-image-matching software
– Grid spacing: 10m (0.3 arc-sec)– Unit: 35km x 35km / scene
PRISMTriplet stereo images DSM
(and Ortho-image)
DOGS-AP
52011 IEEE International Geoscience & Remote Sensing Symposium
Introduction Visual Comparison (4km x 4km)
SRTM-3 DEM ASTER-GDEM PRISM-DSM LiDAR-DSM
0m 150m
90m
N60 ゚ ~S56 ゚ PRISM data areas except for clouds
N/A
IfSAR from STS-99
Airborne LiDAR
Mesh Size
Data Area
Source
N83 ゚ ~S83 ゚
Satellite Stereo Triangulation
ASTER GDEM is a product of METI and NASA
30m 10m 1m
Satellite Stereo Triangulation
62011 IEEE International Geoscience & Remote Sensing Symposium
Software overview Full support for the PRISM sensor model
– Interior parameters– Exterior parameters (including satellite orbit and attitude data)– Relative / absolute orientation
(Ba c kwa rd)
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
- 150 - 100 - 50 0 50 100 150
12345678
PRISM CCD unit alignments
(Nadir)
- 0.55
- 0.50
- 0.45
- 0.40
- 0.35
- 100 - 50 0 50 100 150
123456
(Fo rwa rd)
- 0.10
- 0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
- 150 - 100 - 50 0 50 100 150
12345678
CCDA/B
CCD6CCD7
CCD8
Ground/CCD Plane
Earth rotate direction Forward
Nadir Backward
CCD3CCD4
CCD5
CCD1CCD2
CCD3CCD4
CCD5CCD6
CCD3CCD4
CCD5CCD6
CCD7CCD8
CCD2CCD1
ALOS /Focal Point
CCD1
CCD2Pixel No.1Pixel No.1
FlightDirection
CCD1CCD2
CCDA/B
CCD6CCD7
CCD8
Ground/CCD Plane
Earth rotate direction Forward
Nadir Backward
CCD3CCD4
CCD5
CCD1CCD2
CCD3CCD4
CCD5CCD6
CCD3CCD4
CCD5CCD6
CCD7CCD8
CCD2CCD1
ALOS /Focal Point
CCD1
CCD2Pixel No.1Pixel No.1
FlightDirection
CCD1CCD2
PRISM sensor alignments on optical bench (side view)
FWD
BWD
NDR
STT
Optical BenchRoll
Yaw
Pitch
72011 IEEE International Geoscience & Remote Sensing Symposium
Software overview (cont.) Area-based grid matching with cross-correlations Simultaneous triplet image matching (F-N & B-N)
FWD(F) NDR(N) BWD(B)
DSMs generated with different stereo pairs
F-N & B-N B-NF-N F-B F-N & B-N & F-B
82011 IEEE International Geoscience & Remote Sensing Symposium
Software overview (cont.) Why 10m grid spacing?
PRISM-DSMs generated in different grid spacing
100m
0m
Height ScalePRISM nadir image2.5m
20m 10m
5m 2.5m
92011 IEEE International Geoscience & Remote Sensing Symposium
Being used at JAXA, RESTEC, and former ALOS-Data-Node agencies (ASF/America, GSTDA/Thailand, and GA/Australia)
Accuracies from our past validations with LiDAR reference
Software overview (cont.)
-75 83 2.88 2.82 0.6043669079Kenai-W*2Flat & Mountain
-2371648.75 8.70 0.94 23465889PSLCVegetation
-73325.21 4.92 -1.70 1287801TsukubaMountainous
-178835.09 4.88 1.47 1505512Saitama*1Flat & Urban
Kenai-E*2
Fukuoka*1
Site
-102 112 5.96 5.69 -1.8030327521Steep
-2101177.39 7.05 2.20 1178376Various
Min [m]
Max [m]
RMSE [m]
SD [m]
Bias [m]
PointsTerrain
*1) provided by Geospatial Information Authority of Japan (GSI) *2) provided by Alaska Satellite Facility (ASF)
102011 IEEE International Geoscience & Remote Sensing Symposium
Relative-DSM
Absolute-DSM
Data archiving status Scene-DSM archives
– Absolute-DSM (GCP used) : >1300 scenes– Relative-DSM (GCP not used) : >4200 scenes (as of June 2011)
Locations of scene-PRISM-DSMs processed in JAXA/EORC as of June 2011
112011 IEEE International Geoscience & Remote Sensing Symposium
Stacking scene-DSMs in Japan (as of Mar. 2011)
Path : 57~92 (pt. +/-1.2 for each)Frame : 2680~3115
1016 scene-frames for covering whole Japan
No. of stack scenes for each frame
34.13473~4
Color
13.71395~9
52.05281~2
0.220
%No. of frames
No. of stacks
Data archiving status (cont.)
90Path
80 70 60
2700
2800
2900
3000
3100
Fra
me
122011 IEEE International Geoscience & Remote Sensing Symposium
Mosaic processing
Scene-DSMin 0.3 arc-sec(path-frame) ...
Boundary smoothing among 1 ゚ x1 ゚ tiles and interpolating data on land-water/sea masks
Mosaic-DSM on 1 ゚ x1 ゚tile
Mosaicking on 1 ゚ x1 ゚tile
DSM mosaic for global data set
Stack-DSM
QC/QA and stacking on same path-frame
132011 IEEE International Geoscience & Remote Sensing Symposium
DSM data stacking
Scene-DSMs of different dates
DSM mosaic for global data set (cont.)
Cloud masksNoise in low correlation areas
Averaged only with height bias adjustmentsFilling holes of cloud masksNoise reductionStack-DSM
142011 IEEE International Geoscience & Remote Sensing Symposium
DSM data stacking
DSM mosaic for global data set (cont.)
-2101177.39 7.05 2.20 1FukuokaVarious
-96364.374.17-1.305
-189634.394.141.444
3
1
1
Stack scenes
-73325.21 4.92 -1.70 TsukubaMountainous
-178835.09 4.88 1.47 SaitamaFlat & Urban
Site
-206896.63 6.40 1.73
Min [m]
Max [m]
RMSE [m]
SD [m]
Bias [m]
Terrain
Accuracy comparison between scene-DSM and stack-DSMDifference from LiDAR reference
152011 IEEE International Geoscience & Remote Sensing Symposium
Mosaicking on 1 ゚ x1 ゚ tiles– Offset-bias errors in relative-DSMs:
• X : 5m RMS• Y : 4m RMS• Z : 14m RMS
– Only Z offset-bias of relative-DSMs were corrected with absolute reference (e.g., SRTM) or the average of height differences on an overlap area of a neighboring absolute DSM.
Negligible for 10m grid spacing
DSM mosaic for global data set (cont.)
Absolute-DSMRelative-DSMs
Z-Offset-bias correction
162011 IEEE International Geoscience & Remote Sensing Symposium
1 ゚ x1 ゚ tiles in Japan (101 tiles)
DSM mosaic for global data set (cont.)
145140135130125
45
40
35
30
25
172011 IEEE International Geoscience & Remote Sensing Symposium
1 ゚ x1 ゚ tiles mosaic in Japan– 73 tiles of all 101 tiles– Offset bias of relative-DSMs were
corrected with absolute-DSMs or heights on coast lines
DSM mosaic for global data set (cont.)
Gray scale image of mosaicked DSM(Preliminary result)
>2000m
0m
Cloud / Snow
Land-WaterSea
Mask:
Height scale
(Preliminary)
182011 IEEE International Geoscience & Remote Sensing Symposium
DSM mosaic for global data set (cont.)
Number of Data Stack
1 ゚ x1 ゚ tiles mosaic in Japan– Total 2265 scene-DSMs
• 647 absolute-DSMs• 1618 relative-DSMs
– Max. 9 scenes stack– Max. 23 data stack
>10
0Data stack
(Preliminary)
192011 IEEE International Geoscience & Remote Sensing Symposium
Height accuracies on GCPs
DSM mosaic for global data set (cont.)
GCP distribution(3236 GCPs)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
GCP height [m]
PRIS
M/D
SM h
eigh
t [m
]
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
- 10 - 8 - 6 - 4 - 2 0 2 4 6 8 10
He igh t Erro r (PRISM/DSM minu s GCP) [m]
Cou
nt
-20.97 36.70 3.36 3.33 -0.47
MinMaxRMSσµ
GCP heights vs. PRISM-DSM heights(GCP height range: 11m~1567m)
Height difference statistics (in meters)
Height difference histogram
202011 IEEE International Geoscience & Remote Sensing Symposium
Height difference from existing global terrain data– GSI50m-DEM: 50m-DEM derived from contour lines of 1/25000 map– SRTM-3: 90m-DSM derived from C-band IfSAR
DSM mosaic for global data set (cont.)
+30m
-30m
+/-0m
+30m
-30m
+/-0m
Height difference from SRTM-3for 3x3 tiles in Kanto-region
Height difference from GSI50m-DEM
for 3x3 tiles in Kanto-region
212011 IEEE International Geoscience & Remote Sensing Symposium
Visual comparison (6km x 6km)
DSM mosaic for global data set (cont.)
PRISM-DSM(10m)
Digital Map 10m Grid (Elevation)
by GSI
ASTER-GDEM(30m)
ASTER GDEM is a product of METI and NASA
SRTM-3(90m)
Derived from contour lines of 1/25000 map
0m
200m
222011 IEEE International Geoscience & Remote Sensing Symposium
Visual comparison (3km x 3km)
DSM mosaic for global data set (cont.)
PRISM-DSM(10m)
Digital Map 10m Grid
(Elevation)by GSI
Kyushu Univ. / Ito campusBuilt in 2009
232011 IEEE International Geoscience & Remote Sensing Symposium
Contribution to the study on GLOF in Bhutan Himalayas– GLOF (Glacial Lake Outburst Flood) project supported by JICA/JST
• To extract dangerous glacial lakes which have a possibility of GLOF.• To make an inventory of expanding history for glacial lakes.• To make a flood hazard map.
DSM mosaic for global data set (cont.)
WEP.M.6 “DEVELOPMENT OF GLACIAL LAKE INVENTORY IN BHUTAN USING “DAICHI” (ALOS)”By Takeo Tadono, et. al.
TH1.T04.4“TEMPORAL MONITORING OF SUPRAGLACIAL LAKES ON TSHOJO GLACIER AT BHUTAN”By Tsutomu Yamanokuchi, et. al.
Related presentations in IGARSS2011
UtilizingPRISM-DSM
Glacial lakes in Bhutan on AVNIR-2 3D-view image with PRISM-DSM
242011 IEEE International Geoscience & Remote Sensing Symposium
DSM mosaic for global data set (cont.)
N26
N27
N28
N29
E88 E89 E90 E91 E92 E93
PRISM-DSM mosaic tiles over Bhutan area
N026E088 N026E089 N026E090 N026E091 N026E092
N027E088 N027E089 N027E090 N027E091 N027E092
N028E089 N028E090 N028E091
Contribution to a study on GLOF in Bhutan Himalayas
252011 IEEE International Geoscience & Remote Sensing Symposium
DSM mosaic for global data set (cont.)
AVNIR-2 image mosaic over Bhutan
Contribution to a study on GLOF in Bhutan Himalayas
262011 IEEE International Geoscience & Remote Sensing Symposium
Contribution to a study on GLOF in Bhutan Himalayas
DSM mosaic for global data set (cont.)
SRTM-3 (version 2)
Void data in SRTM-3
7000m
0m
Heightscale
272011 IEEE International Geoscience & Remote Sensing Symposium
Contribution to a study on GLOF in Bhutan Himalayas
DSM mosaic for global data set (cont.)
7000m
0m
Heightscale
PRISM-DSM mosaic (0.3 arc-sec)
N026E088 N026E089 N026E090 N026E091 N026E092
N027E088 N027E089 N027E090 N027E091 N027E092
N028E089 N028E090 N028E091
282011 IEEE International Geoscience & Remote Sensing Symposium
Contribution to a study on GLOF in Bhutan Himalayas
DSM mosaic for global data set (cont.)
Number of data stack (max 11 data in 160 scenes mosaic)
>5
0
DatacountOffset-bias of relative-DSMs were estimated
from the mode of difference from SRTM-3
292011 IEEE International Geoscience & Remote Sensing Symposium
Contribution to a study on GLOF in Bhutan Himalayas
DSM mosaic for global data set (cont.)
+30m
-30m
PRISM-DSM minus SRTM-3
+/-0m
Void data in SRTM-3
302011 IEEE International Geoscience & Remote Sensing Symposium
Contribution to a study on GLOF in Bhutan Himalayas
DSM mosaic for global data set (cont.)
PRISM-DSM(0.3 arc-sec / 10m)
SRTM-3(3.0 arc-sec / 90m)
voids
mask
Visual comparison (5km x 5km)
312011 IEEE International Geoscience & Remote Sensing Symposium
Contribution to a study on GLOF in Bhutan Himalayas
DSM mosaic for global data set (cont.)
PRISM-DSM(0.3 arc-sec / 10m)
SRTM-3(3.0 arc-sec / 90m)
voids
Visual comparison (10km x 10km)
322011 IEEE International Geoscience & Remote Sensing Symposium
Summary
Processed thousands of PRISM-scene-DSMs in 10m-grid so far. Tested over 70 1 ゚ x1 ゚ tiles of their seamless mosaic in Japan
area. Processed 13 1 ゚ x1 ゚ tiles of their seamless mosaic in very
steep Bhutan Himalayas and provided them to the GLOF project. Planning to complete a global DSM mosaic for the whole areas
of Japan, first.
PRISM-scene-DSM is provided to general users by RESTEC as a value-added (commercial) product on order. (
http://www.alos-restec.jp/en/)