identification and remittances
TRANSCRIPT
Identification and remittances
7th ERNOP ConferenceJuly 10, 2015
ESSEC Business School, Paris, France
Does integration hinder immigrant giving to the country of origin?
Authors
Arjen de Wit, VU University Amsterdam Daisha M. Merritt, James Madison University Sabith Khan, Virginia Tech
Remittances
Private transfers from immigrants to country of origin
Mostly to family members Altruistic, exchange, strategic, insurance and/or
investment motives (Lucas & Stark 1985; Rapoport & Docquier 2006)
Is this a form of philanthropy?
The data
The Giving in the Netherlands Immigrant Survey (GINIS) 2008
Five non-western migrant groups: Turkish, Moroccan, Surinamese, Antillean, Afghan
N = 564 CAWI and CAPI
Immigration in the Netherlands
1960s: 'guest workers' from Southern Europe and Northern Africa
1970s: increase in migration from (former) colonies in Caribbean
2000s/2010s: migration from Eastern European Union
Migrant groups in the Netherlands
Turkish origin 396,414
Moroccan origin 374,996
Surinamese origin 348,291
Antillean origin 146,855
Afghan origin 43,183
Non-western migrants 1,997,584
Total population 16,829,289
No decay in % of people remitting
Years living in the Netherlands
Amount remitted increases/decreases/increases
€
Years living in the Netherlands
How can decay be explained?
Identification model (Schervisch & Havens 1997) Philanthropic giving partly determined by
communities people participate in and the way people view society
Is this applicable to remittances giving?
Results
Total (0/1) Family (0/1) Total (€) Family (€)
Logistic Logistic OLS OLS
Years in NL 0.004 -0.005 -5.166 -5.005
Contact in country of origin
2.173*** 2.274*** 181.900 182.798
Contact Dutch friends
-0.042 -0.102 -60.709 -38.453
Volunteer in NL 0.290 0.208 -29.240 -64.803
Dislike Dutch friends
-0.107 -0.100 -110.400 -107.906
Dislike Dutch partner
0.118 0.071 -7.434 -3.525
How likely you return
0.139* 0.158** -11.873 -43.537
*** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1. Controlled for ethnicity, age, gender, religion, household size, education, marital status and income.
Summing up
No decay in remittances giving Immigrants who are in touch with country of
origin more likely to give remittances Immigrants who intent to return more likely to
give remittances Integration in new country not related to
remittances giving
Does integration hinder immigrant giving to the country of origin?
Not necessarily (Sense of) belonging to community in country of
origin determines remittances giving
Considerations
People give remittances because they want to show off
International money transfers have become easier
TV and other media raise awareness of need Some diaspora have increasingly strong shared
identity There might be a difference between first and
second generation immigrants
Thank you!
Arjen de Wit, VU University Amsterdam Daisha M. Merritt, James Madison University Sabith Khan, Virginia Tech