idea, part b hot topics and updates
DESCRIPTION
IDEA, Part B Hot Topics and Updates. Bonnie L. Graham, Esq. [email protected] Jennifer B. Segal, Esq. [email protected] Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2013. Agenda. Maintenance of Effort Supplement N ot Supplant Use of Funds Dispute Resolution Subgrant. What??? Keep It Up!. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
IDEA, Part BIDEA, Part BHot Topics and UpdatesHot Topics and Updates
Bonnie L. Graham, Esq.
Jennifer B. Segal, Esq.
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Fall Forum 2013
AgendaAgenda
- Maintenance of Effort- Supplement Not Supplant- Use of Funds- Dispute Resolution- Subgrant
2Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
IDEA, PART B STATE IDEA, PART B STATE AND LOCAL AND LOCAL MAINTENANCE OF MAINTENANCE OF EFFORTEFFORT
What???What???
Keep It Up!Keep It Up!
3Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
State Maintenance of State Maintenance of Financial Support (MFS)Financial Support (MFS)(State Maintenance of Effort (MOE))(State Maintenance of Effort (MOE))
A State must not reduce the amount of State financial support for special education and related services for children with disabilities below the amount of that support for the preceding fiscal year.
◦Must use ALL State funds!!
4Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Failure to Meet State Failure to Meet State MOEMOE
Consequences for failure to maintain support:
◦ ED reduces allocation for any FY following the FY in which the State fails to comply.
◦ Reduction is the same amount by which the State fails to meet the requirement.
◦ Following year reverts back to previous level of effort
Ability of SEA to reduce its MOE is VERY RARE!
5Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Local-level Maintenance Local-level Maintenance of Effort (MOE)of Effort (MOE)
An LEA may not use its Part B funds to reduce the level of expenditures for the education of children with disabilities made by the LEA from local funds below the level of those expenditures for the preceding fiscal year.
(IDEA Regs Section 300.203(a))
6Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Local-level Maintenance Local-level Maintenance of Effort (MOE) (cont.)of Effort (MOE) (cont.)
SEA must determine that an LEA complies with [MOE] for purposes of establishing the LEA’s eligibility for an award for a fiscal year if the LEA budgets, for the education of CWDs, at least the same total or per capita amount from either of the following sources as the LEA spent for that purpose for the same source for the most recent prior year for which information is available: ◦ (i) local only; (ii) State and local
(IDEA Regs Section 300.203(b)(1)) 7Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
NPRM – 300.203(a)NPRM – 300.203(a)
Compliance standard. An LEA meets this standard if it does not:◦Reduce from State and local, in total or
per capita, below preceding fiscal year;◦Reduce from local, in total or per
capita, below the year for which LEA met MOE standard based on local only; or
◦Reduce from local, in total or per capita, below preceding fiscal year if the LEA has not previously met the MOE compliance standard based on local funds only
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 8
NPRM – 300.203(b)NPRM – 300.203(b)Eligibility standard. The amount of
local funds an LEA budgets for CWDs is at least the same, in total or per capita, as the amount it spent for that purpose in the most recent fiscal year for which information is available and the LEA met MOE compliance standard based on local funds only ◦ If an LEA has not previously met MOE
based on local funds only, then budget the amount spent from local funds in the most recent fiscal year for which information is available
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 9
NPRM – 300.203(c)NPRM – 300.203(c)
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 10
NPRM – 300.203(d)NPRM – 300.203(d)Consequence of failure to
maintain effort. If LEA fails to meet MOE, the SEA is liable in a recovery action to return to ED, using non-federal funds, an amount equal to the amount by which the LEA failed to maintain its level of expenditures.
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 11
Fiscal year (actual expenditures) Local funds State funds
State and local funds
Reductions in Expenditures pursuant to § 300.204 or § 300.205
Covering SY 2006-2007 * 110 190 300
Covering SY 2007-2008 70 210 * 280
20 reduction permissible under § 300.204(a).
Covering SY 2008-2009 40 230 * 270
10 reduction permissible under § 300.204(c).
Covering SY 2009-2010 40 240 * 280Covering SY 2010-2011 60 220 * 280Covering SY 2011-2012 * 80 150 230
Covering SY 2012-2013 * 75 160 235
5 reduction permissible under § 300.205.
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 12
IDEA SUPPLEMENT IDEA SUPPLEMENT NOT SUPPLANTNOT SUPPLANT
13Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
SEA Supplement Not SupplantSEA Supplement Not Supplant
•Part B funds must be used to supplement and increase the level of Federal, State and local funds expended for special education and related services provided to children with disabilities, and in no case supplant those Federal, State and local funds.•A State may use funds it retains for State admin and other State-level activities without regard to the prohibition on supplanting other funds
34 CFR 300.164
14Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
LEA Supplement Not SupplantLEA Supplement Not Supplant
• Part B funds must be used to supplement State, local and other Federal funds (used for providing services to children with disabilities). 34 CFR 300.202.
•If LEA meets MOE, then LEA meets supplement not supplant requirements• No particular cost test • ARRA Guidance, April 2009
15Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OMB Circular A-133 OMB Circular A-133 Compliance SupplementCompliance Supplement
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 16
Auditors presume supplanting occurs if federal funds were used to provide services** . . .1.Required to be made available under other federal, State, or local laws2.Paid for with non-federal funds in prior year3.Same service to non-Title I students with State/local funds
**Note that the Compliance Supplement states that these provisions do not apply to IDEA!
LEA Supplement Not Supplant LEA Supplement Not Supplant (cont.)(cont.)
17Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OSEP Policy letterOSEP Policy letterMN DOE, January 30, 2013
◦“The district would be required to demonstrate that the Federal IDEA, Part B funds they are requesting to be used for CEIS supplement and do not supplant existing State, local and other federal funds, including ESEA funds, the district is using for [its program].” Citing 34 CFR 300.202.
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 18
CEIS and Supplement Not SupplantCEIS and Supplement Not Supplant
CEIS must supplement any ESEA activities or services. 34 CFR 300.226(e)
Model example:
1. CEIS and local funds serve total population – CEIS for eligible CEIS students
2. Title I provides Response to Intervention to Title I students and CEIS supplements
19Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Supplement Not Supplant Supplement Not Supplant (cont.)(cont.)
20
IDEA, Part B funds must be used to supplement and not supplant State, local, and other Federal funds.
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Use of FundsUse of Funds
Use of IDEA FundsUse of IDEA Funds
OSEP Policy Letter, WI March 2013To what extent can IDEA be used to support personnel that work with students who are not students with disabilities?
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 22
Use of IDEA FundsUse of IDEA Funds
OSEP Policy Letter, WI March 2013“IDEA, Part B funds may not be used for non-special education instruction in the general education classroom, instructional materials for use with non-disabled children, or for professional development of general education teachers not related to meeting the needs of children with disabilities, subject to two exceptions:”
◦ CEIS set-aside, 34 CFR 300.226◦ Consolidated in schoolwide school, 34 CFR
300.206
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 23
Use of IDEA FundsUse of IDEA Funds
OSEP Policy Letter, WI March 2013Can Sped Teacher provide interventions to small group of students with and without disabilities?
◦ Yes, if teacher must prepare the lesson/provide services to SWDs, other nondisabled students may attend the lesson and benefit from those services,
BUT◦ If fully funded by IDEA, Part B, teacher cannot
grade papers, meet with parents or perform any other functions with nondisabled students
34 CFR 300.208(a)Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 24
Use of IDEA FundsUse of IDEA Funds
OSEP Policy Letter, WI March 2013Can Sped Teacher provide interventions as part of RTI to small group of students solely without disabilities?
◦ NO, teacher funded with IDEA, Part B funds cannot serve small group of students without disabilities.
Can Sped Teacher co-teach in an inclusion classroom with general ed teacher and have equal responsibility for students with and without disabilities?
◦ Determined on case by case basis, however teacher funded with IDEA, Part B cannot perform functions beyond providing specialized instruction and related services.
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 25
Use of IDEA FundsUse of IDEA Funds
OSEP Policy Letter, WI March 2013Can Sped teacher work on child find team that determines whether to refer students for sped services?
◦ Yes, child find activities may be funded with IDEA, Part B.
Can Sped Teacher assist teachers working with nondisabled students regarding interventions?
◦ To the extent the assistance is considered PD for general ed teacher to identify, locate and evaluate SWDs. Otherwise, cannot assist in interventions for general ed students.
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 26
Use of IDEA FundsUse of IDEA Funds
OSEP Policy Letter, MN January 2013Can CEIS funds be used to support students with disabilities?
◦ No, CEIS cannot support services to children with disabilities or nondisabled students who do not need additional academic and behavioral support to succeed in a general education environment
◦ 34 CFR 300.226
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 27
DISPUTE DISPUTE RESOLUTIONRESOLUTION
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 28
MediationMediationAvailable for matters arising prior to the filing
of due process complaint ◦ Not limited to issues raised in due process
hearing; may mediate any issues in dispute
Mediation is CONFIDENTIAL!
LEA cannot require mediation◦ SEA responsible for selecting mediators, and it
must be on a random, rotational, or other impartial basis
◦ “[ED does] not believe that a hearing officer can order that the parties to a due process complaint engage in mediation.” (71 Fed. Reg. 46694 (Aug. 14, 2006)).
29Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
State Complaints State Complaints Each SEA must establish procedures
for filing and resolving state complaints.◦60 day time limit◦ Independent on-site investigation◦Provide complainant with opportunity to
submit additional information ◦Provide public agency with opportunity to
respond◦ If a parent filed the complaint - Provide
opportunity for mediation◦ Independent, written decision◦Remedies and corrective actions for
noncompliance found 30Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Due Process ComplaintsDue Process ComplaintsDue Process Complaints:
◦Allow parents/students to enforce the rights guaranteed under the IDEA.
◦Relate to refusal or denial to initiate or change the identification, evaluation, educational placement of the provision of a free appropriate public education (FAPE).
◦May be filed by a parent, student, or LEA.◦The alleged violation must have occurred
within 2 years of the date of the complaint. Some States have a 1 year statute of limitations.
◦Each SEA must establish and maintain due process procedures.
31Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OSEP Memo and Q&AOSEP Memo and Q&ADispute Resolution, July 2013Dispute Resolution, July 2013Under what circumstances do the Part
B regulations prevent public agencies from using mediation?◦Parent’s refusal or failure to respond to
consent to the initial provision of sped and related services
◦Parent’s revocation of consent for continued provision of sped and related services
◦Parent’s refusal or failure to respond to consent to initial evaluation or reevaluation of child who is home schooled or parentally placed in private school at parental expense
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 32
OSEP Memo and Q&AOSEP Memo and Q&ADispute Resolution, July 2013Dispute Resolution, July 2013May States use IDEA funds for
recruitment and training of mediators?◦Yes, States must bear the cost of
mediation, cannot require LEAs to use Part B funds to pay for mediation
Is mediation confidential?◦Discussions in mediation are
confidential; agreements may or may not be confidential
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 33
OSEP Memo and Q&AOSEP Memo and Q&ADispute Resolution, July 2013Dispute Resolution, July 2013If parent wants to challenge LEA’s
eligibility determination, can parent file State complaint?◦Yes, SEA may not refuse to resolve a
State complaint even if the complaint concerns a matter that could also be resolved through due process
Can you appeal a State complaint?◦Regs are silent; permitted if State sets
up appeal process
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 34
OSEP Memo and Q&AOSEP Memo and Q&ADispute Resolution, July 2013Dispute Resolution, July 2013When can LEA use due process
procedures to override parent’s refusal to consent?◦ Initial evaluations and reevaluations
If parent wants an independent educational evaluation and LEA believes its evaluation is appropriate, must the LEA file due process complaint?◦Yes, the LEA must “without unnecessary
delay” file a due process complaint or pay for the IEE
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 35
OSEP Memo and Q&AOSEP Memo and Q&ADispute Resolution, July 2013Dispute Resolution, July 2013If both parents have legal
authority to make educational decisions and one parent revokes consent for provision of sped and related services, may the other parent file due process complaint to override the revocation of consent?◦No, the LEA must accept the one
parent’s revocation of consent. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 36
OSEP Policy Letter, Mtn Plains OSEP Policy Letter, Mtn Plains Regional Resource Center, Oct. Regional Resource Center, Oct. 20082008Can an SEA require an LEA to
correct individual student IEPs that the SEA determined noncompliant during monitoring activities?
AndCan an SEA require an IEP team
meeting be reconvened if procedures were not followed?◦Yes, per SEA’s general supervisory
responsibility (34 CFR 300.149)Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 37
SUBGRANTSSUBGRANTS
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 38
SEA Distribution of SEA Distribution of FundsFunds
State Administration is Capped! ◦ FY 09: Same
reservation as FY 2004 or $800,000 (plus rate of inflation)
Other State-level Activities are Capped!
◦ Amount Equal to 10% of SEA Allocation of FY 2006 (adjusted cumulatively for inflation)
◦ No Reasonable Adjustments
39Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
LEA Distribution of FundsLEA Distribution of Funds LEA Base payments
◦ Section 611 (Grants to States) – FY1999 data
◦ Section 619 (Preschool Grants) – FY1997 data
85% Population-based◦ Relative numbers of
children enrolled in public & private elementary & secondary schools within LEA’s jurisdiction
15% Poverty-based◦ Relative numbers of
children living in poverty as determined by SEA
40Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OSEP Policy Letter, MN DOE, OSEP Policy Letter, MN DOE, February 2009 February 2009
Can an SEA allocate funds to a “co-op” which covers several participating districts?◦Yes, if co-op meets IDEA definition of “LEA”
34 CFR 300.12Can the “co-op” then subgrant funds
to some or all of the participating districts?◦No, “nothing in either IDEA or EDGAR
allows a subgrantee (an entity receiving funds from the grantee) to further subgrant funds to other entities, including member or participating districts of a co-op”
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 41
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 42
This presentation is intended solely to provide general information and does not constitute legal advice. Attendance at the presentation or later review of these printed materials does not create an attorney-client relationship with Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC. You should not take any action based upon any information in this presentation without first consulting legal counsel familiar with your particular circumstances.
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
DisclaimerDisclaimer
43