hydrologic losses and radar measurements cive 6361 – chapter 1 spring 2010

57
Hydrologic Losses Hydrologic Losses and Radar and Radar Measurements Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010 Spring 2010

Upload: gregory-simmons

Post on 01-Jan-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

Hydrologic Losses and Hydrologic Losses and Radar MeasurementsRadar Measurements

CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1

Spring 2010Spring 2010

Page 2: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

Qe = energy used for evaporation

Qh = sensible heat

Q = stored energy

Qv = advected energy

QN = net radiation absorbed by water body

Lake Energy BudgetLake Energy Budget

Page 3: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

• Function of wind speed, T, and

humidity gradient

•  Energy source - solar energy

• Mass transfer, energy budget,

and pan evaporation

• Penman’s combined (1948)

Lake EvaporationLake Evaporation

Page 4: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

E = es - ea (a + bu)

Where E = evaporation (cm/day)

es = Sat vapor pressure (T)

ea = Vapor pres at fixed z

u = wind speed in m/sec

a,b = constants

Mass TransferMass Transfer

Page 5: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

Shallow Lake Evap Shallow Lake Evap (Kohler, 1955(Kohler, 1955))

Page 6: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

Evaporation PansEvaporation Pans

• Anemometer - wind

• Rain Gage - precip.

• Pan for water - evap

• Level measured daily

• Refilled as necessary

Page 7: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

Soil Moisture CycleSoil Moisture Cycle Very Complex Soil Physics

• Autumn - rainfall recharge

• Winter - max soil storage

• Spring - some evap loss

• Summer – most depleted condition

Page 8: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

Surface Flow Surface Flow DistributionDistribution

Page 9: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

Horton’s Infiltration ConceptHorton’s Infiltration Conceptf(t) = Rate of water loss into soilf(t) = Rate of water loss into soil

f = fc + (fo - fc) exp (-kt)

fc = final rate value

fo = initial rate value

K = decay rate

Can integrate to get

F(t) = Vol of infiltration

Page 10: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

Horton’s EqnHorton’s Eqn

Page 11: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

index Methodindex Method• Assumes constant rate

  over time of rainfall

• Volume above line is

  DRO

• Volume below line is F(t)

• Trial and error computed

Page 12: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

Example of Example of IndexIndex

DRO

VOL Infiltration F(t)

DRO

Page 13: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

Example of Example of IndexIndexAssume 4.9 in of DRO from a 560 acre BasinSet up a general Eqn for indexindex

2(1.4 - +3(0.7-

Find by trial and error by assuming a value and solving - try = 1.5 in/hrAnd it only accounts for 0.8 x 3 = 2.4 in of DRO0.5 in/hr yields 9.0 in of DRO - too much DRO

Try 1.0 in/hr or 2(.4) +3(1.3)+2(.1) = 4.9 inches

Page 14: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

Brays Bayou at Main Brays Bayou at Main St BridgeSt Bridge

Page 15: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

• Measure v at 0.2 and 0.8 of depth

• Average v and multiply by W*D

• Sum up across stream to get total Q

Stream Cross-Section for QStream Cross-Section for Q

Page 16: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

• Plot of z vs. Q

• Determined from stream

   measurements of V

• Unique for each stream

• Changes with development

• Available for all USGS gages

Typical Rating Curve for StreamTypical Rating Curve for Stream

Page 17: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

Traditional Flood Alert SystemTraditional Flood Alert SystemUse measured rainfall

Predict hydrologic Response in x,y, and t

Alert various agenciesand emergency mgrs

Save lives and damages

Page 18: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

Use of NEXRAD Rainfall for Use of NEXRAD Rainfall for Hydrologic PredictionHydrologic Prediction

Page 19: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

• Recent Innovation

• Uses radar - NWS

• DPA every 5 minutes

• Accurate to 230 km

• Provides better spatial

detail than gages

NEXRAD Radar DataNEXRAD Radar Data

Page 20: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

Radar Provides Visual EffectsRadar Provides Visual Effects

Midnight 1 a.m.

Page 21: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

Radar–Rainfall RelationshipsRadar–Rainfall Relationships

Z = 300 R 1.4 Standard

Z = 250 R 1.2 Tropical

Z = radar reflectivity in dBZR = rainfall rate in in/hr

Ratio of gage value to radar value = BIAS

Page 22: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

Rice Blvd. and Brays Bayou

02468

1012

0 10 20 30 40 50

Time (hr.)

Gauge DataRadar Data

Cum

ulat

ive

Rai

nfal

l (

in.)

October, 1994 CalibrationOctober, 1994 Calibration

Page 23: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

Rain Gage and Radar Rainfall Estimates

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

4.00

4.50

5.00

5 P

M t

o 6

PM

6 P

M t

o 7

PM

7 P

M t

o 8

PM

8 P

M t

o 9

PM

9 P

M t

o 10

PM

10 P

M t

o 11

PM

11 P

M t

o 12

AM

12 A

M t

o 1

AM

1 A

M t

o 2

AM

2 A

M t

o 3

AM

3 A

M t

o 4

AM

4 A

M t

o 5

AM

June 8 - 9, 2001

Hou

rly R

ainf

all (

in)

.

Main St. Radar Pixel, 12.21 inches Total

Main St. Gage - HCOEM, 12.13 inches Total

Rice University Gage, 14.74 inches Total

Page 24: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

Weather Radar SystemsWeather Radar Systems

Recently deployed weather radar systems such Recently deployed weather radar systems such as NEXRAD offer accurate and reliable as NEXRAD offer accurate and reliable precipitation estimation precipitation estimation

Increased sensitivity coupled with improved Increased sensitivity coupled with improved processing provides high-resolution radar data processing provides high-resolution radar data sets for a variety of applications. sets for a variety of applications.

Provides another source of rainfall information in Provides another source of rainfall information in addition to rain gaugesaddition to rain gauges

Page 25: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

WSR-88D - NEXRADWSR-88D - NEXRAD

The first operational WSR-88D was The first operational WSR-88D was installed in May 1990 at Twin Lakes, OKinstalled in May 1990 at Twin Lakes, OK

160 + deployed nationwide and overseas.160 + deployed nationwide and overseas. Is now being used for much more than Is now being used for much more than

weather forecasts. weather forecasts. Most significant advancement in hydrology Most significant advancement in hydrology

in last 20 years!in last 20 years!

Page 26: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

Users of Radar and Users of Radar and Meteorological DataMeteorological Data

Real-time access to radar and other Real-time access to radar and other meteorological data is now provided to meteorological data is now provided to

users outside of the NWSusers outside of the NWS

NEXRAD has spawned a private sector NEXRAD has spawned a private sector meteorological services industrymeteorological services industry

Now other users are beginning to experience the Now other users are beginning to experience the benefits within the hydrologic communitybenefits within the hydrologic community

Page 27: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

Low Precision 16-level Image

Page 28: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

16-level precision image vs. 256-level data

Page 29: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

T.S. ALLISON RADAR RAINFALL OVER BRAYS BAYOU WATERSHED12 HOUR TOTALS BY SUBAREA

Page 30: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

FAS2 will add 482 radar rain gauges over Brays

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

ð

ð

ð

ð

ð

ð

ð

ð

ð

ð

ð

ð

Page 31: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

T.S. Allison Storm TotalT.S. Allison Storm TotalJune 8-9, 2001June 8-9, 2001

Bayous

Counties

Highways

Drainage

TMCÊÚStorm Total (in)

0.01 - 0.25

0.25 - 0.5

0.5 - 1

1 - 2

2 - 4

4 - 6

6 - 8

8 - 10

10 - 12

12 - 14

14 - 16

16 - 18

18 - 20

20 - 22

22 - 25

> 25

ÊÚ

.-,45

.-, 10

.-,59

N

0 5 10 Miles

26.6 in

Page 32: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

Prospects for Flood Modeling Prospects for Flood Modeling in the Futurein the Future

Forecasting urban streams that respond rapidly to heavy rainfall is difficult.

Such forecasts can easily underpredict the river stage with little or no lead time

CASA radars may help revolutionize our ability to see and predict rainfall

CASA funded as an NSF ERC to several universities including UMass, OU, CSU, Rice

Page 33: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

NETRAD Sites and coverage over Houston, Texas.

NSF Proposed ERC for Houston Testbed New Radar Technology for 2005-2010 time periodProvide data at 200 meter scale accuracy

Page 34: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

NETRAD Sites and coverage over Houston, Texas.

New CASA Radars for Deployment to Oklahoma

Page 35: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

Harris Gully Harris Gully Watershed AnalysisWatershed Analysis

Philip B. BedientCivil and Environmental Engineering

Rice University

Page 36: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

Engineering ResearchEngineering Research This research was funded by:This research was funded by:

City of Houston City of Houston Rice UniversityRice University Texas Medical CenterTexas Medical Center Harris County Flood Control DistrictHarris County Flood Control District

Special thanks to Walter P. Moore Associates, Inc. Special thanks to Walter P. Moore Associates, Inc. and JF Thompson, Inc. for their assistance on the and JF Thompson, Inc. for their assistance on the projectproject

Page 37: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

Harris Gully drainsRice/TMC Area

Brays Bayou and Harris Brays Bayou and Harris GullyGully

Harris Gully: Harris Gully: 4.5 sq. mi.4.5 sq. mi.Study Area: Study Area: 8 sq. mi.8 sq. mi.Brays Bayou: Brays Bayou: 129 sq. mi.129 sq. mi.

TMC

Page 38: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

Stormwater ModelingStormwater Modeling

Four Key ElementsFour Key Elements

RainfallRainfall Minor Drainage System Minor Drainage System

Pipes, culverts, inlets, leadsPipes, culverts, inlets, leads Major Drainage System Major Drainage System

Streets, sheet flow, open channels, storageStreets, sheet flow, open channels, storage Tailwater Conditions — Brays BayouTailwater Conditions — Brays Bayou

Page 39: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

Harris Gully WatershedHarris Gully Watershed

BraysBayou

Page 40: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

Alumni Drive facing South - 8 amAlumni Drive facing South - 8 am

RMC Jones School

TMC

© Rik Hovinga

Page 41: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

Existing Minor Drainage NetworkExisting Minor Drainage Network

2-15’x15’

2-11.5’x15’

7.5’x11’

90”

60”

72”

6.5’

x10’

66”

60”

60”

72”

60”6.

5’x1

0’

66”

72”

96”

114”

54”

84”

Hermann Park

TMC

Rice

Page 42: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

Major SystemMajor System

All water that cannot flow through the All water that cannot flow through the minor system must:minor system must: Be stored in small or large depressions, or Be stored in small or large depressions, or

man-made pondsman-made ponds Flow down streetsFlow down streets Flow overland as sheet flowFlow overland as sheet flow

Major system modeled as storage areas Major system modeled as storage areas interconnected by weirs.interconnected by weirs.

Page 43: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

Digital Elevation ModelDigital Elevation ModelBased on 1999 Aerial Survey

DEM Used to Determine Overland Flow Connectivity and Storage

Page 44: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

High Water Inundation in Rice/TMC Basin Area

Page 45: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

Tailwater EffectsTailwater Effects High tailwater in Brays reduces the flow capacity High tailwater in Brays reduces the flow capacity

of the minor system up to 80%of the minor system up to 80%

When the minor system is full, the major system When the minor system is full, the major system (streets) starts to fill(streets) starts to fill

High tailwater will flood some areas near the High tailwater will flood some areas near the bayou directly, and cause others to flood due to bayou directly, and cause others to flood due to reduction of flow in the minor systemreduction of flow in the minor system

ElevationElevation and and DurationDuration of Elevationof Elevation are are extremely importantextremely important

Page 46: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

Why a Computer Model?Why a Computer Model?

Analysis tool Analysis tool Why did it flood in the first place?Why did it flood in the first place?

Predictive tool Predictive tool How much rain will cause flooding in the How much rain will cause flooding in the

future?future?

Design tool Design tool What can we do to reduce flooding danger? What can we do to reduce flooding danger?

Page 47: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

Rainfall and Stormwater ModelsRainfall and Stormwater Models

US Army Corps of Engineers’ HEC-HMSUS Army Corps of Engineers’ HEC-HMS Convert rainfall to flowsConvert rainfall to flows Approximates effects of inlets and leadsApproximates effects of inlets and leads

Storm Water Management Model (SWMM)Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) Dynamic hydraulic model of pipes and Dynamic hydraulic model of pipes and

overland flow and storageoverland flow and storage Includes tailwater conditions in bayouIncludes tailwater conditions in bayou

Page 48: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

Modeling the Existing SystemModeling the Existing System Enter Major and Minor system structure Enter Major and Minor system structure

and connectivityand connectivity Input rainfall data from AllisonInput rainfall data from Allison Input tailwater data from AllisonInput tailwater data from Allison Run SWMM using Allison input dataRun SWMM using Allison input data Compare Allison results to observed high Compare Allison results to observed high

water marks near Rice and TMCwater marks near Rice and TMC Use calibrated model to analyze various Use calibrated model to analyze various

alternatives for the systemalternatives for the system

Page 49: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

37.0’

20.8’

Note: All elevations are based on 1987 Datum

39.3’

TS Allison Peak 41.8’

Box Culvert

Page 50: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

TS Allison CalibrationTS Allison CalibrationBackwater Computation HEC-RASBackwater Computation HEC-RAS

Page 51: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

SWMM Model Results and Observed High Water MarksSWMM Model Results and Observed High Water Marks

Page 52: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

Mitigation Options – Harris GullyMitigation Options – Harris Gully

Use model to evaluate other major culvertsUse model to evaluate other major culverts Kirby Dr, MacGregor Dr, Hermann DriveKirby Dr, MacGregor Dr, Hermann Drive

Evaluate natural overland drainage swale and Evaluate natural overland drainage swale and storage area in the Hermann Park area along storage area in the Hermann Park area along the Bayouthe Bayou

Evaluate all options for Harris Gully including Evaluate all options for Harris Gully including impact of the depressed SW freeway and impact of the depressed SW freeway and model their impacts on water levels in TMC model their impacts on water levels in TMC area.area.

Evaluate effect of Brays Federal Project, Evaluate effect of Brays Federal Project, which lowers Brays Bayou levels near TMCwhich lowers Brays Bayou levels near TMC

Page 53: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

Possible Mitigation Possible Mitigation AlternativesAlternatives

2-15’x15’

2-11.5’x15’

7.5’x11’

90”

60”

72”

6.5’

x10’

66”

60”

60”

72”

60”6.

5’x1

0’

66”

72”

96”

114”

54”

84”

KirbyMacGregor

Hermann

CulvertTMC

Page 54: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

Project BraysProject BraysFederal Flood Control Federal Flood Control

$ 455 Million$ 455 Million

Beltway 8

Bellaire

SH

6

UpstreamElement

UpstreamElement

ChannelEnlargements

ChannelEnlargements

I-45L

oo

p

610

288

BridgeReplacements

BridgeReplacements

US 59

DetentionAreas

DetentionAreas

ChannelEnlargements

ChannelEnlargements

Willow WaterholeBayou Detention

Willow WaterholeBayou Detention

Downstream Element

Downstream Element

Page 55: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

Project BraysProject BraysChannel Enlargements: (Mid Reach)Channel Enlargements: (Mid Reach)

Page 56: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

Final Thoughts…Final Thoughts…

The model indicates that under heavy rainfall, The model indicates that under heavy rainfall,

serious street flooding resultsserious street flooding results

Improve local drainage systemImprove local drainage system

Better manage overland flow thru TMCBetter manage overland flow thru TMC

Better use of advanced flood warning Better use of advanced flood warning

Brays Bayou ProjectBrays Bayou Project – reduces tailwater in the – reduces tailwater in the

range of 3 - 5 ft in 5 years.range of 3 - 5 ft in 5 years.

Page 57: Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurements CIVE 6361 – Chapter 1 Spring 2010

Flood Protection SystemsFlood Protection Systemsin the Futurein the Future

EmergencyEmergencyResponse - TMCResponse - TMC

Flood DoorsFlood Doors Flood GatesFlood Gates Facility EntrancesFacility Entrances CommunicationsCommunications OperationsOperations TrainingTraining