hydrogeochemical characterization to evaluate the ... · hydrogeochemical characterization to...
TRANSCRIPT
Hydrogeochemical Characterization to Evaluate the Potential for In Situ
Selenium Reduction
Erica Andrew, B.Sc.
Background
Characterization program conducted at Teck Coal Fording River Operations in British ColumbiaScope of work included:
Geophysics transectsInstallation of nested groundwater monitoring wellsHydraulic conductivity testsMonitoring and sampling of groundwater and surface water
October 26, 2010 2
Selenium
Present in both inorganic and organic formsSolid, liquid and gas phasesIs an essential nutrient and is also a contaminant at higher concentrationsSelenium distribution and chemistry is complex and driven by redox conditions, biological activity, pH and sorptionDO and nitrate must be removed before significant selenium reduction can occurCCME guideline for selenium is 0.001 mg/L
October 26, 2010 3
Selenium Chemistry
4 primary oxidation states +6 selenate (SeO4
-2)+4 selenite (HSeO3
-
and SeO32-)
elemental selenium Se0
-2 selenide Se-2
Driven byRedox conditionsBiological activitySorption processes
October 26, 2010 4 Higashi et al., Pp. 355-360 in: J.H. Lehr and J. Keeley (Eds.), Water Encyclopedia:Water Quality and Resource Development. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ. 717 pp. (May 2005).
Biological Treatment Primer
October 26, 2010 5
BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PRIMER Biological treatment relies on oxidation reduction reactionsThe processes that occur in natural environments are based on energetic favorability
Bacterial Cell
CO2
Organic Carbon
Electron Transfer
Electron Donor Electron Acceptor
H2O
O2
Biological Treatment Primer
October 26, 2010 6
Bacterial Cell
CO2
Organic Carbon
Electron Transfer
Electron Donor Electron Acceptor
Decreasing Energy Yield
H2O
O2
N2
NO3 Fe3+
Fe2+ H2S
SO4
CH4
CO2
Se
SeO42-
Geophysical Survey
Two 1 km transectsOne at the base of the STPSecond south of Kilmarnock settling pondsElectrical Resistivity Imaging and electromagnetic (EM31) surveys conductedUsed to select drilling locationsDelineated channel and non-channel depositsUsed with K-test results to estimate flux through valley
October 26, 2010 8
Drilling Program
Barber RigFour sets of nested wellsGravel with varying amounts of sandBedrock encountered in STP wells
October 26, 2010 11
South Tailings Pond
October 26, 2010 13
Located on the fluvial sands, gravels and glacial till of the Fording River valleyCurrently used for ongoing tailings discharge from the process and wash plant operationsWater is also reclaimed and is re-used in the process plant
South Tailings Pond
October 26, 2010 14
SEEPAGE ANALYSISMAIN EMBANKMENT- EL. 1633mMAXIMUM WATER HEAD
1633 masl
1606
160
8
1630
8 .67 56e -00 5 (m³/s ec)
DISTANCE, m-20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
ELEV
ATIO
N, m
(x 1
000)
1.580
1.585
1.590
1.595
1.600
1.605
1.610
1.615
1.620
1.625
1.630
1.635
1.640
1.645
1.650
Pond EL. 1632mEL.1633m
Golder Associates Ltd., Design Review South Tailings Pond Dam, Fording River Operations (April 2009).
Sampling Points at South Tailings Pond
October 26, 2010 15
13 groundwater sample locations
Four installed by Golder in 2009Eight existing standpipes around the STPSeepage return well
8 surface water sample locations
Groundwater at STP
Groundwater levels vary in the nested wellsA downward gradient exists in the nested wellsSeepage from STP likely to the Kilmarnock alluvium to the south and the Fording River to the westGroundwater flow below and immediately adjacent to the STP likely comprises mostly or entirely STP seepage
October 26, 2010 16
Water Chemistry for STP
Shows some indication of conditions suitable for selenium attenuation, specifically reductionReducing conditions are evident by:
Low DONegative Eh measurementsPresence of reduced redox species
Results indicate that the STP itself and seeps do not support selenium reduction
October 26, 2010 17
Water Chemistry at STP
Groundwater wells on the west and main embankment, conditions are reducingThe nested wells and seepage return well show low DO, but relatively high positive EhThe Fording River shows oxidizing conditions
October 26, 2010 18
09-03A 09-03B
Water Chemistry at STP
October 26, 2010 19
1599.24
D. Selenium 0.0098 mg/LNitrate 0.709 mg/LDO 5.39 mg/LEh 249 mV
1600.97 1599.47
1593.78
D. Selenium 0.0185 mg/LNitrate 1.12 mg/LDO 0.09 mg/LEh 242 mV
Kilmarnock Alluvium
Average flow rate of 110,702 m3/dayTwo phases of settling pondsUnderlain by fluvial sands and gravelsDepth to groundwater ranges from 6.25 to 10.52 m bgs
October 26, 2010 21
Sampling Points at Kilmarnock
Four groundwater sample locations installed by Golder in 2009Four to seven surface water sample locations depending on the time of year
October 26, 2010 22
Water Chemistry for Kilmarnock Alluvium
Results indicate no reducing conditionsIncrease in NO3 and Se as compared to STPDO values near solubility levelsHigh positive Eh valuesAttenuation evaluated using two scenarios
October 26, 2010 23
Scenario One
Groundwater represents only seepage from settling pondsGroundwater flow through upgradient areas is prohibitedGroundwater mounding is expected to be significantSelenium concentrations represent approximately 30% of pond inflow
October 26, 2010 24
Scenario Two
Represents a mixing of groundwater flow through and pond rechargeAssumes STP nested wells represent upgradient groundwaterSimple mixing calculation for selenium75% of groundwater may be flow through from nearby STP25% represents pond recharge
October 26, 2010 25
Conclusions
South Tailings Pond
Not conducive to selenium reductionLower selenium concentrations in STP seepage samples and nearby groundwater suggests some selenium attenuationWithin the underlying groundwater system, the groundwater is oxygenated within a short distance from STPSelenium added to the groundwater is expected to migrate downgradient with limited attenuation
October 26, 2010 26
Conclusions
Kilmarnock Alluvium
Reducing conditions do not exist in the alluvium or settling pondsDO values are near solubility and high positive Eh valuesSimple mixing calculations suggest selenium attenuation for the settling ponds between 50% and 70%Further data and evaluation is needed
October 26, 2010 27
Related Research
Active Pilot Treatment SystemPit Lake ProfilingPRB EvaluationPassive Treatment System
October 26, 2010 28