how to improve the sensitivity of the multiplex detection ...€¦ · how to improve the...
TRANSCRIPT
-
How to improve the sensitivity of the multiplex detection of cancer biomarkers?multiplex detection of cancer biomarkers?
Zhugen Yanga, Yann Chevolota, Yasemin Ataman-Önalb, Geneviève Choquet-Kastylevskyb, Claude Lambertc, Eliane Souteyranda and
Emmanuelle LaurenceauaEmmanuelle Laurenceau
a Université de Lyon Institut des Nanotechnologies de Lyon UMR-CNRS 5270Université de Lyon, Institut des Nanotechnologies de Lyon , UMR CNRS 5270, Ecole Centrale de Lyon (France)
b bioMérieux, Département bioMarqueurs, Marcy l’Etoile (France)c Laboratoire d’Immunologie clinique IFR143, CHU Saint-Etienne Hôpital Nord (France)
118èmes Journées Scientifiques du CLARA – 21 & 22 mars 2013
-
Context of the study
Colorectal cancer is the third cancer worldwide with a survival rate ~ 56%
Efficient decrease of mortality with mass-screening (FOBT)good specificity = 98%good specificity 98%low sensitivity ~ 50-60%
A tib d b d iFOBT iti it b t ifi itAntibody-based iFOBT: sensitivity but specificity
Urgent need to develop blood-based assay for cancerUrgent need to develop blood-based assay for cancer biomarkers detection
increase sensitivity and keep high specificityimprove patient’s compliancereduce mortality
228èmes Journées Scientifiques du CLARA – 21 & 22 mars 2013
reduce mortality
-
(Mazurczyk R et al. Sens Actuators B chem, 2008; 128(2): 552-559)
Customized antibody microarray on 3D-microstructured Chip
(Mazurczyk R et al. Sens Actuators B chem, 2008; 128(2): 552 559)
40 microwellsVolume = 250 nL
parallel screening of 40 biological samples or experimental
Volume = 250 nL
p g g p pconditions
tiny sample requirement
Detection antibody (concentration, label)
C t tib d
Target cancer biomarker (protein, peptide, carbohydrate)
Detection antibody (concentration, label)
( tti b ff b t ti )
Solid support (glass slide)Surface chemistry
Capture antibody
(fonctional groups, surface energy, composition)
(spotting buffer, probe concentration)
33
Solid support (glass slide)
8èmes Journées Scientifiques du CLARA – 21 & 22 mars 2013
-
Previous results5 Cancer biomarkers: CEA, p53, Hsp60, PDI, DefA6
(Yang Z. et al. Sens Actuators B chem, 2012; 175: 22-28)
, p , p , ,6 surface chemistries: -COOH, -NHS / CMD, MAMVE,
-NH2 (APDMES) / Chitosan3 spotting buffers: Acetate (pH 4.5), PBS (pH 7.4), Carbonate (pH 9.6)
Optimization of capture antibody immobilization
Spotting buffer:Carbonate (pH9 6) [ t Ab] 10 M
448èmes Journées Scientifiques du CLARA – 21 & 22 mars 2013
Carbonate (pH9.6)Acetate (pH4.5)
[capture Ab] = 10 µM
-
Previous results (Yang Z. et al. Sens Actuators B chem, 2012; 175: 22-28)
Optimization of biological recognitionOptimization of biological recognition
LODLOD
Cut off=Mean+3SDCut off Mean 3SD
Selected surfaces:NHS
Tumor antigens Optimal surfaces LOD Dynamic range
CEA MAMVE/CMD 10 pM 4.7 log/4.0 log
HSP60 NHS/Chitosan/MAMVE 10 pM 4 7 log/4 0 log /4 7 log
Tumor antigens Optimal surfaces LOD Dynamic range
CEA MAMVE/CMD 10 pM 4.7 log/4.0 log
HSP60 NHS/Chitosan/MAMVE 10 pM 4 7 log/4 0 log /4 7 log MAMVEChitosan
HSP60 NHS/Chitosan/MAMVE 10 pM 4.7 log/4.0 log /4.7 log
PDI NHS 10 pM 4.7 log
DEFA6 Chitosan 10 pM 4.7 log
HSP60 NHS/Chitosan/MAMVE 10 pM 4.7 log/4.0 log /4.7 log
PDI NHS 10 pM 4.7 log
DEFA6 Chitosan 10 pM 4.7 log
558èmes Journées Scientifiques du CLARA – 21 & 22 mars 2013
CA19-9 NHS/CMD 10 U/mL 3.0 log/3.0 logCA19-9 NHS/CMD 10 U/mL 3.0 log/3.0 log
-
Spotting design and conditions
B1 A t t + 0 05% PVA
IgG-Cy3 in B2
B1=Acetate + 0.05% PVA IgG-Cy3 in B1 Capture Ab in B1
Capture Ab in B2B2=Carbonate + 0.05% PVA
A ti H 60
Anti-CEA21
3
Detection AbDetection AbAnti-Hsp60
Anti-PDI4567
Capture Absera
Capture Absera
Anti-DefA6
Anti-p53
78
109
Blank = buffer (B1, B2)Positive control = purified cancer biomarker (10 nM)Positive control = purified cancer biomarker (10 nM)2 healthy donors’ sera = N1, N2 (1/250)4 CRC sera = CRC1, CRC2, CRC3, CRC4 (1/250)
668èmes Journées Scientifiques du CLARA – 21 & 22 mars 2013
-
Results : Proof of Concept• buffer: white bar / 2 normal sera (red pink bars)buffer: white bar / 2 normal sera (red, pink bars)• 4 colorectal cancer sera (blue, orange, green, yellow bars)• purified antigen: black bar
Detection of cancer biomarker significantly depends on surfacesignificantly depends on surface chemistry
778èmes Journées Scientifiques du CLARA – 21 & 22 mars 2013
-
Conclusion
CEA Hsp60 PDI DefA6 p53CRC1 NHS
CRC2 Chitosan Chitosan NHS NHS
CRC3 Chitosan NHSMAMVE
NHSMAMVE
CRC4 NHS Chitosan NHSPositive CRC sera 1/4 2/4 2/4 3/4 3/4
Detection of a single cancer biomarker display low sensitivityDetection of a single cancer biomarker display low sensitivity
Multiplex detection of cancer biomarkers in optimal conditions (surface chemistry, [probe], spotting buffer) significantly increase the sensitivity
888èmes Journées Scientifiques du CLARA – 21 & 22 mars 2013
-
Perspectives
Future work will focus on:
enlarge patients’ cohorte to validate the number of cancerenlarge patients’ cohorte to validate the number of cancer biomarkers to be detected
integration of optimal chemistries on the same support to improve the accuracy of a cost-effective test
compare antibody microarrays to Vidas
determine reproducibility and linearity of the multiplex detection
evaluate LOD, LOB, LOQ
998èmes Journées Scientifiques du CLARA – 21 & 22 mars 2013
-
Financial support:
Acknowledgements
Financial support:
PhD fellowship
BQRBQR
C’NANO Rhône-Alpes
Technical support:
NANOLYON Plate-forme
Prof. T. Delair (Laboratoire des Matériaux Polymères et Biomatériaux)
Zhugen Yang (PhD student) Dr. Claude LambertDr. Yann ChevolotDr. Eliane SouteyrandyDr. Thomas Géhin
Dr Yasemin Ataman-ÖnalDr Yasemin Ataman ÖnalDr Geneviève Choquet-Kastylevsky
10108èmes Journées Scientifiques du CLARA – 21 & 22 mars 2013