how a culture of disregard for the public taints the federal lcr and banalizes harm from lead in...

44
How a Culture of Disregard for the Public Taints the Federal LCR and Banalizes Harm from Lead in Water Across the US Yanna Lambrinidou, PhD Science and Technology in Society Na:onal Capital Region Campus Falls Church, VA American Public Health Associa:on (APHA) Annual Mee:ng & Expo Denver, CO October 29November 2, 2016

Upload: jim-bloyd-mph

Post on 22-Jan-2018

119 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

 How  a  Culture  of  Disregard  for  the  Public  

Taints  the  Federal  LCR  and    Banalizes  Harm  from  Lead  in  Water  Across  the  US  

     

Yanna  Lambrinidou,  PhD  Science  and  Technology  in  Society  Na:onal  Capital  Region  Campus  

Falls  Church,  VA    

American  Public  Health  Associa:on  (APHA)  Annual  Mee:ng  &  Expo    Denver,  CO  �  October  29-­‐November  2,  2016  

         

Presenter Disclosures

The following personal financial relationships with commercial interests relevant to this presentation existed during the past 12 months:

Yanna Lambrinidou

No relationships to disclose

Source   Lead  (ppb)   Standard  EPA  LCR    0   Health  standard    EPA  LCR   15   Lead  acEon  level  EPA   40   “Imminent  and  substanEal  

endangerment”  

EPA  Lead-­‐in-­‐Water  Standards  

Flint  2014-­‐  

Apr  2014  -­‐  Flint  switches  to  Flint  River  water  

Sep  2014  -­‐  MDEQ  engineer  Prysby:  "Thanks  Richard...now  off  to  physical  therapy...perhaps  mental  therapy  with  all  of  these  Flint  calls....lol"      

Oct  2014  –  MDEQ  engineer  Prysby:  “I  stressed  the  importance  of  not  branding  Flint’s  water  as  ‘corrosive’  from  a  public  health  standpoint  simply  because  it  does  not  meet  a  manufacturing  facility’s  limit  for  produc:on.”    

Residents’  tap  water  comes  out  brown,  has  bad  taste,  has  roaen-­‐egg  smell    

Residents  begin  to  report  sores  and  lesions,  suspect  trihalomethanes  (THMs)    

Oct  2014:  GM  finds  that  Flint’s  water  is  corrossive  to  engine  parts;  it  switches  back  to  Lake  Huron  water    

Jan  2015  –  Flint’s  emergency  manager  calls  Flint  mom  LeeAnne  Walters  “a  liar  and  stupid”  for  bringing  aaen:on  to  samples  of  discolored  water  

Lead  levels  at  LeeAnne  Walters’  house  measure  at  104  ppb.    

Feb  2015  –  EPA  program  manager  Crooks:  “Let  me  tell  you,  this  Flint  situa:on  is  a  nasty  issue  —  I’ve  had  people  call  me  4  leaer  words  over  the  phone,  yell  at  me  and  call  me  a  crook.  I’m  developing  a  thick  skin.”  

Feb  2015  –  MDEQ  engineer  Busch:  Flint  “is  mee:ng”  federal  rules  for  ac:on  on  lead;  not  "sure  why  region  5  sees  this  one  sample  as  such  a  big  deal.”        

Lead  levels  at  LeeAnne  Walters’  house  measure  at  397  ppb.    

Mar  2015  –  MDEQ  blames  Ms.  Walters’  plumbing  and  lies  to  EPA  about  having  op:mal  corrosion  control  treatment  in  place.  

Apr  2015  –  MDEQ  engineer  Busch:  “If  he  con:nues  to  persist,  we  may  need  Liane  or  Director  Wyant  to  make  a  call  to  EPA  to  help  address  his  over-­‐reaches.”      

Sep  2015  –  Virginia  Tech:  “The  analysis  revealed  that  30%  of  252  tap  samples  exceeded  15  ppb.  “FLINT  HAS  A  VERY  SERIOUS  LEAD  IN  WATER  PROBLEM.”  

Sep  2015  –  Hurley  Medical  Center:  incidence  of  elevated  blood  lead  levels  in  Flint  children  increased  from  2.4%  to  4.9%.  6,000-­‐12,000  children  may  have  been  exposed.  

Apr  2015  –  MDEQ  finally  admits  it  is  using  no  corrosion  control  to  treat  the  water  –  this  suggests  that  the  lead  contamina:on  might  be  widespread.  

Sep  2015  –  MDHHS  Healthy  Homes  manager  Priem:  "...This  is  definitely  being  driven  by  a  liale  science  and  a  lot  of  poli:cs.”  

Culture  of  “technical  compliance”  

To:  Governor  Snyder  From:  Flint  Water  Advisory  Task  Force                              12.29.15      

Signed:    

•  Maa  Davis  •  Chris  Kolb  •  Larry  Reynolds  •  Eric  Rothstein  •  Ken  Sikkema      

Plumbing  material   US  homes  affected  Leaded  brass   Almost  all  Lead  solder   Approx.  81  million  Lead  service  lines/goosenecks/pipes  

6-­‐10+  million  

Marc  Edwards,  presenta:on  to  NDWAC  LCR  WG,  9/9/2014  

Image  sources:  hap://op:purewater.com/blog/royseibert/do-­‐you-­‐use-­‐brass-­‐fipngs-­‐water-­‐filter-­‐installa:on;  courtesy  of  Dr.  Marc  Edwards,  Department  of  Civil  and  Environmental  Engineering,  Virginia  Tech;  www.hamilton.ca/sites/default/files/media/browser/2015-­‐11-­‐11/lead-­‐pipe-­‐2.png  

brass   solder   service  line  

EPA  Lead  and  Copper  Rule  (LCR)  

Lead  dose  in  one  glass  of  water  exceeding  the  US  Consumer  Product  Safety  Commission  “acute  health  threat”  for  lead  71  :mes  

Image  sources:  haps://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/06/060630095556.htm;  courtesy  of  Dr.  Marc  Edwards,  Department  of  Civil  and  Environmental  Engineering,  Virginia  Tech      

lead  parEcles  

lead  par:cle  

“Russian  rouleWe”  phenomenon  

 

1986  EPA:  Annually  over  250,000  children  “are  exposed  to  lead  in  drinking  water  at  levels  high  enough  to  impair  their  intellectual  and  physical  development”    

     

   

 

Shenon,  P.  1990.  Despite  Law,  Study  Finds,  Water  in  US  Schools  May  Contain  Lead.  New  York  Times  (11/1);  US  Department  of  Agriculture.  2000.  Selec0ng  and  Renova0ng  an  Old  House:  A  Complete  Guide,  p.  13.  Toronto,  ON:  General  Publishing  Company,  Ltd.    

Federal  Register,  Vol.  56,  No.  110  (1991),  Maximum  Contaminant  Level  Goals  and  Na:onal  Primary  Drinking  Water  Regula:ons  for  Lead  and  Copper,  pp.  26470,  26478.  

No safe level of lead in water for human consumption

Maximum  Contaminant  Level  Goal  for  lead  =  zero  

>15  ppb  

<15  ppb  

≤10%  over  lead  acEon  level  

Remedial  ac:on  NOT  required  

>10%  over  lead  acEon  level  

Remedial action required

Remedial action required

•  Source  water  treatment  •  CC  treatment  (re-­‐)op:miza:on  •  Public  educa:on  •  LSL  replacement  

“shared  responsibility”  regime  

Water  U:li:es   Consumers  

required  to  prevent  citywide  contaminaEon  

expected    to  take  appropriate  precauEons  

PUBLIC  EDUCATION  

Nov  2000:  switch  to  chloramine  

Washington,  DC  2001-­‐2004  

   

Nov  2000  

Jul  2000-­‐Jun  2001:  WASA  meets  federal  requirements  by  not  repor:ng  to  EPA  5  samples  >15  ppb    

18%  over  LAL  

Nov  2000  

Jul  2000-­‐Jun  2001:  WASA  meets  federal  requirements  by  not  repor:ng  to  EPA  5  samples  >15  ppb    

Michael  Marcoae,  DC  WASA  Chief  engineer:  “Crisis  was  averted.”    

Eric  H.  Holder,  Jr.  Report,  2004,  p.  47  

Image  source:  hap://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-­‐dyn/ar:cles/A52310-­‐2004Jun18.html  

18%  over  LAL  

Nov  2000  

Jul  2000-­‐Jun  2001  

Sep  2001  

Nov-­‐Dec  2001:  DC  DOH  reports  35-­‐40  calls  from  concerned  residents  reques:ng  LSLR  

Nov  2000  

Jul  2000-­‐Jun  2001  

Sep  2001  

Nov-­‐Dec  2001  

Jun  2002:  WASA’s  2001-­‐2002  monitoring  cycle  showed  that  49%  of  taps  exceeded  the  LAL      

Mar  2002  

49%  over  LAL  

Nov  2000  

Jul  2000-­‐Jun  2001  

Sep  2001  

Nov-­‐Dec  2001  

Jun  2002:  WASA’s  2001-­‐2002  monitoring  cycle  showed  that  49%  of  taps  exceeded  the  LAL      

Mar  2002  

Michael  Marcoae:  Results  likely  to  be  a  

“fluke.”    

Image  source:  hap://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-­‐dyn/ar:cles/A52310-­‐2004Jun18.html  

49%  over  LAL  

Image  sources:  hap://logos.wikia.com/wiki/DC_Water;  hap://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/14/Environmental_Protec:on_Agency_logo.svg;  haps://c2.sta:cflickr.com/6/5098/5471579521_f2db1c2c27_z.jpg      

“Every  single  day,  WASA  reliably  delivers  safe  drinking  water  that  meets  or  surpasses  EPA  requirements”      

Nov  2000  

Jul  2000-­‐Jun  2001  

Sep  2001  

Nov-­‐Dec  2001  

Jun  2002      

Oct  2002:  EPA  announced  that  WASA  had  officially  exceeded  the  Lead  Ac:on  Level  

Mar  2002  

Jan  2003  

Spring  2003      

Spring  2003:  WASA’s  LSLR  planning  supervisor  felt  that  “‘the  more  detailed  informa0on  that  WASA  can  be  ready  to  present  on  the  payment  aspects  and  work  logis0cs,  the  less  chance  there  is  that  people  may  focus  on  the  health  aspects.’  [She]  added,  ‘One  can  only  hope.’”                  

Jodye  Russell,  DC  WASA  engineer,  planning  supervisor    

Jan  2003  

Spring  2003  

Spring  2003  

June  2003  

Fall  2003  

Dec  2003:  Charles  Eason,  grandfather  of  4-­‐year-­‐old,  aaends  WASA  mee:ng  and  suspects  serious  problem    

Mar  2003  

Image  source:  hap://gallery.pictopia.com/wpost  and  hap://www.vt.edu  

6,118  homes  tested  4,075  with  high  lead  

1.31.04  

CDC’s  “no  harm”  study  

CDC  2004  

Source   Lead  (ppb)   Standard  EPA  LCR    0   Health  standard    EPA  LCR   15   Lead  acEon  level  EPA   40   Imminent  and  substanEal  

endangerment  

Citywide  analysis  of  BLLs  for  infants  <1.3  years:    

•  First  to  second  half  of  2001,  incidence  of  elevated  BLLs  increased  by  9.6  :mes  •  In  2002  &  2003,  the  incidence  of  elevated  BLLs  was  ≥  4  :mes  higher  than  in  2000  •  Elevated  BLL  incidence  did  not  return  to  2000  levels  un:l  about  2005    

Edwards,  M.,  S.  Triantafyllidou,  and  D.  Best,  “Elevated  Blood  Lead  in  Young  Children  Due  to  Lead-­‐Contaminated  Drinking  Water:  Washington,  DC,  2001-­‐2004,”  Environmental  Science  and  Technology  43,  5  (2009):  1618-­‐1623.  

 

Image  source:  hap://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-­‐dyn/content/ar:cle/2005/11/02/AR2005110202940.html  

≈  2,000  babies  not  born    

≈  200  fetal  deaths  (>28  weeks  in  gesta:on)  

LCR  Revisions  

     

“Contractors  looked  at  files  in  10  states,  one  in  each  Region.  In  general,  the  file  review  did  not  find  a  naEon-­‐wide  problem  of  high  lead  levels  in  drinking  water.”  

“We  see  liWle  opportunity  for  immediate  regulatory  acEon…”  

Correct  implementa:on  of  the  LCR      

Informed  health-­‐protec:ve  ac:on  

Most  people  don’t  know  they  are  responsible  for  self-­‐protec:on  

“shared  responsibility”  regime  

Water  U:li:es   Consumers  

“Safe”  water  can  result  in  miscarriage,  fetal  death,  and  EBLLs    

limitaEon  of  regulatory  compliance  

limitaEon  of  corrosion  control  treatment  

No  corrosion  control  treatment  eliminates  lead  in  water    

limitaEon  of  tap  monitoring  

LCR  test  is  insufficient  for  determining  worst-­‐case  levels  of  lead  

CCT   “EFFECTIVE”   u:lity  meets  LAL  

techno-­‐centric  definiEons  divorced  from  public  health    

tap  water   “SAFE”   u:lity  meets  LAL  

BanalizaEon  of  harm  

Don’t  look,  don’t  ask,  don’t  tell  

 2015    

•  >  5,363  u:li:es  violated  the  LCR  (>18  million  people)  •  1,110  u:li:es  exceeded  the  lead  ac:on  level  (3.9  million  people)  •  Viola:ons  included  u:lity  failure  to  inform  consumers    •  State  agencies  and  EPA  took  enforcement  ac:on  in  only  11.2%  of  cases  

June  2016,  Erik  Olson  &  Kris:  Pullen  Fedinick    

Don’t  look,  don’t  ask,  don’t  tell  

Image  sources:  hap://a.dilcdn.com/bl/wp-­‐content/uploads/sites/13/2012/10/pregnant-­‐belly.jpg;  hap://il2.picdn.net/shuaerstock/videos/9728954/thumb/1.jpg?i10c=img.resize(height:160)    

Dust   Paint   Soil  

Focus  on  hand-­‐to-­‐mouth  ac:vity  

Don’t  look,  don’t  ask,  don’t  tell  

Image  sources:  hap://www.milwaukeemag.com/wp-­‐content/gallery/0915_lead-­‐paint_home-­‐inspec:on/0915_Lead.Paint-­‐Kenny.Yoo-­‐014.jpg;  hap://www.communityhealthstrategies.com/wp-­‐content/uploads/2015/05/iStock_000001430192_ChildonFloorEa:ngCrumbs_1180-­‐x-­‐594.jpg;  hap://www.epa.gov/sites/produc:on/files/documents/paintchip.pdf;  hap://www.bgiresourcesintl.com/wp-­‐content/uploads/2016/01/

mixing-­‐of-­‐composite-­‐1-­‐e1452292751800.jpg    

Don’t  look,  don’t  ask,  don’t  tell  

•  No  official  acknowledgement  •  No  official  apology  •  No  one  held  accountable  •  No  assistance  to  affected  children  •  No  jus:ce  (class  ac:on  lawsuit  dismissed  in  

2013;  the  cases  of  5  children  just  sealed)    

Acknowledgments  

•  The  Na:onal  Science  Founda:on  (NSF)  for  grant  EEC  1551152  (Early-­‐Concept  Exploratory  Research  on  the  Professional  Forma:on  of  Engineers’  Concep:ons  of  “the  Public”).    

•  Dr.  Marc  Edwards,  Virginia  Tech  •  Miguel  Del  Toral,  EPA  •  Mike  Schock,  EPA            

 Any  opinions,  findings,  and  conclusions  or  recommenda:ons  expressed  in  this  material  are  those  of  the  author(s)  and  do  not  necessarily  reflect  the  views  of  the  Na:onal  Science  Founda:on.