houston energy efficiency in buildings laboratory
TRANSCRIPT
Core Group:
Co-Chairs:
Partners:World Green
Building Council
THE EEB2.0 PROJECT
reduction in total CO2 emissions in the building sector is neededSource: International Energy Agency
80%Unlock financially viable energy efficiency
investments that today are not being realized because of mostly non-technical
barriers
diagnosis
Step 1
solution
Step 2
scale up
Step 3
Building portfolio / market level“EEB Laboratory”
• Benefits-Barriers-Enablers• Key issues mapping
• Prioritization
Identify key decision-makers Develop solution / action plan
Launch implementationEarly Measuring & Verification
Disseminate best practiceLeverage partners
Replicate in other building portfolios / markets
Situation analysis
Solutions guideAction plan
Corporate, Markets, Cities Decision-Maker
1,000 commitments
globally
THE EEB2.0 PROJECT
THE EEB2.0 PROJECT
2013
2014
2015
India, US, China
Poland, Brazil
France, Germany, Czech Republic, Singapore, Hong Kong
Singapore
Hong Kong
Benelux
Starting:
HOUSTON ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN BUILDINGS LABORATORY
THE BUSINESS CASE FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY WITH MR. GERALD HINES
HOUSTON ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN BUILDINGS LABORATORY
ACCELERATING THE GROWTH OF ENERGY EFFICIENT BUILDINGS IN HOUSTONa locally supported stakeholder engagement to deliver on an action plan for achieving market transformation with a set of clear stakeholder commitments.
40+STAKEHOLDER
INTERVIEWS
28TECHNICAL COMMITTEE
LEADERS
2DAYS OF IN-DEPTH
DISCUSSIONS
4COMMITTEES TAKING ACTIONS FORWARD
TECHNICAL COMMITTEE
HARC, NRG, Schneider Electric, Shell, Keeping PACE in Texas, AGC/AGNA, IMT, Hines, SPEER, City of Houston, Siemens, UTC/Carrier, Architend, Lafarge, ULI Houston,
Gensler, C40/Houston, EDF, ALC, IMT, UTC, WBCSD, US BCSD, and Rice University.
STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWS
On Wednesday, the laboratory technical
committee conducted 41 interviews with Houston-
area stakeholders to learn about what’s working,
barriers and accelerators for energy efficiency.
WHO WE INTERVIEWEDArchitend Ascentergy Avison Young Baker Katz
Buckhead Investment Partners Cadence Bank CBRE City-Housing and Community Development Department
Cousins properties Crimson Services ERM Gensler
HARC Hines Houston ISD HTS Engineering Jacobs
Kensinger Donnelly Klein ISD McCord Development Metro National Moody Rambin New Hope Housing
Nexos Resource Partners Pecan Street Research Institute Rice Shell STG Design TEAM solutions
Trammell Crow Tellepsen USGBC Way Holding Engineering
Texas A&M Energy Systems Lab
WHAT’S WORKING
Corporate headquarters occupants & Class A office owners/operators drive the EEB market
Voluntary approach: investors push for LEED & Energy Star certifications
Strong and progressive building energy codes
The public sector leads by example:
Reducing energy in their own buildings and benchmarking
Raising awareness of the public and provide funding for home weatherization
Encouraging efforts for commercial buildings
The incentives that are available are working
ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSIONS
On Thursday, this same group worked together to
distill key findings from the interviews; and we
conducted four roundtable discussions on value & co-
benefits, financing, policy & regulation, and verifying
value & ROI.
ROUNDTABLE 1: INCREASING VALUE TO STAKEHOLDERS THROUGH ENERGY EFFICIENCY
The benefits of EEB investments for each category of building market stakeholders can be substantiated. A comprehensive value proposition that would define and capture the full spectrum of “co-benefits” from EEB investments, such as occupant productivity, job creation, and reduced utility peak and capacity demand, will be key to eliminating barriers. This roundtable sought to understand and articulate a comprehensive value proposition in the Houston market.
OBJECTIVE
ROUNDTABLE 1: INCREASING VALUE TO STAKEHOLDERS THROUGH ENERGY EFFICIENCY
1) Need to capture and communicate market value. With emphasis on class B and C buildings.
2) Low awareness, and need for education - especially for decision makers.
3) Market pull/demand from tenants is needed because Houston wants market solutions.
4) Building operations impact value.
THE BARRIERS
ROUNDTABLE 1: INCREASING VALUE TO STAKEHOLDERS THROUGH ENERGY EFFICIENCY
NATHAN BAILEY, AUTOMATED LOGIC
ROUNDTABLE 2: INVESTING AND FINANCING ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN BUILDINGS
Thanks to forward-looking state leadership, Houston can leverage new financing methodologies, including PACE financing and CenterPoint’s energy efficiency incentive programs. The purpose of this roundtable was to explain these (and other) financing options and discuss how to promote, pilot and scale their use with all building owners in the Houston area.
OBJECTIVE
ROUNDTABLE 2: INVESTING AND FINANCING ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN BUILDINGS
1) Need simpler ways to turn disaggregated value flow into long-term aggregated cash flow.
2) Lack of sufficient broader market incentives.
3) Absence of financing and investing programs for B & C buildings.
4) Risk aversion to EEB investing and reliance on new technology/solutions.
5) Balance sheet limitations restrict capital.
THE BARRIERS
ROUNDTABLE 2: INVESTING AND FINANCING ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN BUILDINGS
CHARLENE HEYDINGER, KEEPING PACE IN TEXAS
ROUNDTABLE 3: VERIFYING VALUE AND RETURN ON INVESTMENT
Texans and Houstonians have a history and preference for privately led initiatives that achieve better and faster results at a lower cost, such as supporting new financing methods and beautifying Houston’s bayous. This roundtable engaged with building stakeholders to discuss how to assure and verify that EEB investments deliver real returns which contribute to broader aspects of market and shared value.
OBJECTIVE
ROUNDTABLE 3: VERIFYING VALUE AND RETURN ON INVESTMENT
1) Proof of results - for both justification and validation.
2) Better access to and trust in data. And improved and lower-cost data collection technology.
3) There’s a need for better Houston case studies and education on how to best use data.
4) Training and certification for operators.
THE BARRIERS
ROUNDTABLE 4: APPROPRIATE POLICY AND REGULATION FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY
This roundtable discussed how appropriate policies and regulation can be established in a typically non-regulated market to maintain competitiveness that will increase transparency and market activity.
OBJECTIVE
ROUNDTABLE 4: APPROPRIATE POLICY AND REGULATION FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY
1) Little to no energy use transparency in Houston.
2) Limited energy efficiency resource standards.
3) Obstacles in applying LEED (cost, implementation, maintaining, etc).
4) Apply codes based on energy efficiency performance, not just prescriptive technologies.
5) Code compliance and enforcement.
THE BARRIERS