Hot Topics!Accreditation and the

2012 StandardsWhat’s New?

ASCCC Fall Plenary 2012Dolores Davison, Foothill College

Roberta Eisel, Citrus CollegeVirgina May, Sacramento City College

Rubric for Evaluating Institutional Effectiveness – Part III: Student Learning

Outcomes

By fall 2012, all colleges must be at the proficiency level for Student Learning Outcomes.

Rubric for Evaluating Institutional Effectiveness – Part III: Student Learning

OutcomesThe ACCJC has required all colleges to

submit a special report regarding this requirement. In this report, the colleges must demonstrate how they have attained the proficiency level. Half of the reports were due October 2012, and the other half are due March 2013.

Rubric for Evaluating Institutional Effectiveness – Part III: Student Learning

Outcomes

What is required to be at the Proficiency Level?

You must meet all of the criteria from the Awareness and Development Levels as well as the following:

Rubric for Evaluating Institutional Effectiveness – Part III: Student Learning

OutcomesProficiency Level• Student learning outcomes and authentic

assessments are in place for courses, programs,

support services, certificates and degrees.• There is widespread institutional dialogue

about the results of assessment and identification of gaps.

Rubric for Evaluating Institutional Effectiveness – Part III: Student Learning

OutcomesProficiency Level• Decision-making includes dialogue on

the results of assessment and is purposefully directed.

toward aligning institution-wide practices to support and improve student learning.

• Appropriate resources continue to be allocated and fine-tuned.

Rubric for Evaluating Institutional Effectiveness – Part III: Student Learning

OutcomesProficiency Level• Comprehensive assessment

reports exist and are completed and updated on a regular basis.

• Course student learning outcomes are aligned with degree student learning outcomes.

Rubric for Evaluating Institutional Effectiveness – Part III: Student Learning

OutcomesProficiency Level• Students demonstrate

awareness of goals and purposes of courses and programs in which they are enrolled.

Rubric for Evaluating Institutional Effectiveness – Part III: Student Learning

OutcomesWhen do we have to be at the

Continuous Quality Improvement Level?

Rubric for Evaluating Institutional Effectiveness – Part III: Student Learning

OutcomesWhere do I find the entire rubric?

http://www.accjc.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/CoverMemoAndRevisedRubric_10-28-2011.pdf

Evidence

• Just what do we mean by evidence?

• What constitutes evidence?• How do we use evidence?

Governing Board

Questions and concerns

Sanctions, a hot topic

Why are institutions  finding themselves on some form of sanction?

Let’s take a look…

Top Deficiencies Causing Sanctions

(ACCJC Newsletter, June 2012) Colleges on

SanctionProgramReview

PlanningInternal

GovernanceBoard

Financial Stability or

Management

2009 Sanctions(n=24)

71%(17)

92%(22)

46%(11)

46%(11)

54%(13)

2010 Sanctions(n=19)

68%(13)

89%(17)

42%(8)

58%(11)

58%(11)

2011 Sanctions(n=21)

19%(4)

71%(15)

24%(5)

67%(14)

62%(13)

2012 Sanctions(n=28)

21%(6)

71%(20)

18%(5)

71%(20)

50%(14)

Trends in Deficiencies Leading to Sanctions

• The proportion of institutions with deficiencies in program review work has decreased considerably from 71% of those on sanction in 2009 to 19% of those on sanction in 2012.

 

• The proportion of institutions with deficiencies in planning practices has decreased somewhat from 92% of those on sanction in 2009 to 71% of those on sanction in 2012.

 ACCJC Newsletter June 2012

 

Trends, continued

• Internal governance deficiencies have decreased from 46% of those institutions on sanction in 2009 to 18% of those on sanction in 2011.

 • Of most concern, the proportion of institutions

with deficiencies in governing board practices has increased sharply from 46% of on sanction in 2009 to 71% of those on sanction in 2012.

• The proportion of institutions on sanction with deficiencies in financial stability or management has remained at or slightly above 50% since 2009.

ACCJC Newsletter June 2012

Fast forward from 2002 to 2012..

From self study and planning agendas

to

Self evaluation and actionable improvement plans

17

New ACCJC Manuals

• Manual for Institutional Self Evaluation• Team Evaluator Manual• Substantive Change Manual • Guide to Evaluating Institutions

Colleges with comprehensive visits in fall 2012 and beyond are required to use the new manuals.

18

Tools for colleges

MANUAL FORINSTITUTIONAL

SELF EVALUATION

Assessing Educational Quality and Institutional Effectiveness

September 201219

Colleges and visiting teams are to use…

20

Guide to Evaluating Institutions* “Implementation of New

U.S.D.E. Regulations” (see also ACCJC Fall 2011 Newsletter)

Other Hot Topics ?

Let’s hear from our colleagues -