hope college campus master planning process · hope college campus master planning process hope...

HOPE COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLANNING PROCESS

Hope College Master Planning Process 10/3/2016

BACKGROUND


The Strategic Plan


4perkinswill.com

Hope For the World: 2025 Strategic Plan• Goal 6.

Hope College will be the best value among leading liberal arts colleges by providing an unsurpassed educational experience through faithful stewardship and development of resources.

• Objective 2.The college will plan enrollment o the number of students that can be supported by staffing and infrastructure to achieve desired student outcomes.

• KPI 5.Revise and refine the campus master plan to include high priority capital projects over the coming decade. Consideration will be given to environmental sustainability.


Leadership Teams

Planning Consultants &Campus Master Planning Committee


KRISAN OSTERBYLead Campus Planner

REBECCA RAMSEYAssociate Planner / Analyst

JOHN D. SLACKLead Urban Designer

JAY DEMMASpace Use Analyst

DAVID WILKINSLocal Manager/Architect

TIM GERRITSLocal Site Planner

BRAD HEERESLead Engineer

Perkins+WillNational Planning + Design

GMBLocal Knowledge + Engineering


perkinswill.com 7

Campus Master Planning (CMP) Committee Kara Slater, Director of the Physical Plant, Committee Co-Chair

Mary Remenschneider, AVP & Chief of Staff, Committee Co-Chair

Kristyn Bochniak, Director of Residential Life and Education, Student Development

Matthew DeJongh, Professor of Computer Science, Natural and Applied Science, Faculty Moderator

Lindsey Dood, Chair of the Board of Trustees Business and Finance Committee

Karl Droppers, Chair of the Board of Trustees

Jason Gomory, Junior, Vice -President Student Congress

Vanessa Greene, Director, Office of Multicultural Education

Carl Heideman, Director of Process & Innovation and CIT, Computing and Information Technology

Greg Kern, Associate Director, Admissions

John Knapp, President and Professor

Karen Nordell Pearson, Interim Provost

Scott Travis, Executive Director of Alumni Engagement, Development & Alumni Engagement

Yoli Vega, Director, Phelps Scholars Program


PROCESS


1 -

2 3 4INITIATION+

ANALYSIS

4-STEPSCONCEPTS+ BIG IDEAS

PHASING+ PRIORITIZATION

REFINEMENT+ DOCUMENTATION

ESTABLISH GOALS MAP MEETINGS

ASSESS CONDITIONSANALYZE NEEDS

GENERATE SCENARIOS: BUILDINGS OPEN SPACE

INFRASTRUCTURE

INTEGRATE CONCEPTSSET-UP COST MODEL

TEST PHASINGCONFIRM PRIORITIES

DEVELOPMENT PLAN

FACILITIES PLAN UTILITY PLAN COST MODEL


Adaptability. The only constant is change. The best campus plans prepare for shifts over the long term.

Accessibility. Great campuses provide great connections - “the infrastructure of opportunity” - for all.

Stewardship. Good campus plans optimize their academic, financial, environmental and community impact.

Identity. Every campus tells a story. Every good master plan embodies the essence of programs and place.

Experience. The best campuses promote successful experiences, not principles.

MASTER PLAN GUIDING PRINCIPLES: LOOK FORWARD TO ENVISION + ENSURE…


Integratedand

Comprehensive Campus Master

Plan

FACILITY CONDITION + SUITABILITY

COMMUNITYRELATIONS

OPEN SPACE +

STORMWATER

SPACE NEEDS +

UTILIZATION

RESEARCH + LEARNING + WORKSPACE

CIRCULATION + PARKING

HOUSING+ DINING

ATHLETICS + RECREATION

UTILITIES + IT

ASSESSING WHERE WE ARE

POSITIONING WHERE WE NEED TO BE


CAMPUS/COMMUNITY INPUT- Semester Open Forums

PROJECT LEADERSHIP

CMP COMMITTEE

STAKEHOLDERS

DIRECTION-SETTING + ADVISING - Monthly Work Sessions

(3 hours)

PROCESS COORDINATION- Biweekly Check-in

CLEAR PROCESS FOR FEEDBACK CYCLES AND CONFIRMATION

ENGAGING LEADERS + STAKEHOLDERS


FACE-TO-FACE COMMUNICATIONExperience Mapping Visual Listening: Precedents

Tabling Sessions: SWOT Analysis + Reviews

Large Group Presentations: “Dotmocracy”


perkinswill.com 14

DATASpace InventoryCourse Schedule EnrollmentStaffing Research Volumes Housing Parking

STAKEHOLDER INPUT

Admin. Council Steering Comm.

DeansProgram Chairs Stakeholders

GUIDELINESCEFPI NIRSA NCAAPeers

Perkins+WillCustomized Standards

PLANNED CHANGES

New Facilities Additions Repurposing Renovations

Demolitions

OUTCOMES

Exist. UtilizationExist. Space Gap

Future Needs Future Partners

ITERATIVE PROCESS


SPACE UTILIZATION + NEEDS ASSESSMENT

• RFP Tracking Log

• Matrices


HOPE COLLEGE

BY THE NUMBERS

STUDENTS

1.8MILLION SF OF FACILITIES

ON-CAMPUS BEDS

FACULTY/STAFF /

92%EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING /

2400NCAA DIV III

TEAMS

150ACRES OF LAND

22

MAJORS. MINORS, AND PRE-PROFESSIONAL

PROGRAMS

91

2400

3300

830PARKING STALLS


SPACE UTILIZATION• Classroom Size

• Time of Day

• Day of Week

• Students per Seat

• College Goals / Benchmarks

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00

Percen

t of C

lassroom

s Utilize

d

Time of Day

Classroom Daily Room Use: Weekly Average

DRU Goal: 70%

Wkly Rm Use Avg: 66%

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

HH 501

CHM 233

RNS 15

0RN

S 21

0RN

S 31

0RN

S 41

0DC

305

RNS 19

0RM

L 52

5TO

H 21

0RN

S 29

0RM

L 51

5RN

S 39

0HH

307

HH 403

HH 413

OM 010

OM 030

CHM 239

RNS 20

8HH

317

HH 516

RML 42

1SA

C 10

3TO

H 10

8TO

H 11

0TO

H 11

2TO

H 11

4TO

H 21

2TO

H 21

4TO

H 30

8TO

H 31

0TO

H 31

2TO

H 31

4TO

H 31

6CH

M 224

CHM 232

RNS 20

4RN

S 20

6HH

301

HH 514

HH 515

SAC 11

2TB

216

TB 227

OM 020

OM 110

OM 140

OM 210

OM 240

OM 305

OM 310

OM 340

RNS 29

7RN

S 43

5TO

H 18

2TO

H 18

4TO

H 18

6RM

L 42

0RM

L 52

0DC

204

HH 302

HH 319

BMC 01

2BM

C 20

2RN

S 12

4RN

S 13

1TO

H 30

0RN

S 31

6TO

H 30

2

Average Seat Fill / Total Seats

Seat Utilization by Classroom (Spring 2015)

Avg Seats Filled

65% Target

Unfilled Seats

101+ SEATS

71‐100 SEATS

51‐70 SEATS

41‐50 SEATS

31‐40 SEATS 21‐30 SEATS <21 SEATS


SPACE NEEDS BY GENERAL USE CATEGORIES

SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS

• Analyze gaps

• Project targets

• Compare peers

• Find opportunities

• Find efficiencies

• Find synergies


perkinswill.com 19

IMMERSION

“IT IS THE QUALITY OF THE RELATIONSHIPS STUDENTS HAVE THAT IS MOST CLOSELY ASSOCIATED WITH THEIR EVENTUAL COLLEGE SUCCESS.” – RESEARCH BY ALEXANDER AUSTIN, “WHAT MATTERS IN COLLEGE”

Campus Master Planning Process Overview

19


perkinswill.com 20

AGILE LABS

Campus Master Planning Process Overview

20


perkinswill.com 21

COLLABORATIONRENDS COLLABORATION


perkinswill.com 22

TRANSPARENCY, MOBILITY AND TOUCH-DOWN SPACES


perkinswill.com 23

LEARNING COMMONS


perkinswill.com 24

REDEFINED HOUSING


DELIVERABLES


DIGITAL + PRINT DOCUMENTS

1 2 3EXECUTIVE SUMMARYBig IdeasFuture Vision

MASTER PLANDetailed Vision + ConceptsCampus Framework Phasing and Funding Strategies

TECHNICAL APPENDIXCritical Information / Past Studies Space Analysis Utility Analysis


perkinswill.com 28

SPACE ANALYSIS SPREADSHEETS

CURRENT GUIDELINECURRENT Surplus/ Deficit

FUTURE EXISTING

SHORT TERM MID TERM VISIONVisionSurplus/

Deficit

611,954 635,518 (23,565) 556,305 671,185 730,396 765,109 (208,804)

100.10,15 ‐ classroom 146,457 176,478 (30,021) 144,182 182,764 200,431 219,947 (75,765)

200.10,15 ‐ teaching lab 108,338 106,585 1,753 91,830 110,382 121,052 132,839 (41,010)

200.20, 25 ‐ open lab 76,300 50,922 25,377 66,752 52,736 57,834 63,465 3,287

700.11 ‐ e‐learning support 0 5,129 (5,129) 0 5,311 6,159 6,756 (6,756)

LIBRARY/STUDY 400 108,491 136,254 (27,763) 109,305 141,108 154,748 169,816 (60,511)

400‐ Study/ Library 108,491 136,254 (27,763) 109,305 141,108 154,748 169,816 (60,511)

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 300 171,142 166,559 4,583 151,611 174,649 182,739 182,739 (31,128)

300.10, 15 ‐Administrative office 171,142 166,559 4,583 151,611 174,649 182,739 182,739 (31,128)0

215,284 182,979 32,305 208,162 189,428 207,553 229,763 (21,601)

500.10 ‐ armory 156 156 0 156 161 177 194 (38)

500.50,55 ‐ demonstration 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,714 (1,714)

500.60 ‐ field building 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

ACADEMIC 110, 210, 220, 300, 711

TOTAL SPACE ON CAMPUS (IN ASSIGNABLE SQUARE FEET‐ ASF) W/ HAMILTON, MED SCI, BIO SCI, M&M, HEALTH SCI,FINE ARTS &

COMMUNITY BLDG DEMOLISHED

STUDENT SUPPORT 610‐660, 680‐690, 800

CURRENT GUIDELINECURRENT Surplus/ Deficit

FUTURE EXISTING

SHORT TERM MID TERM VISIONVisionSurplus/

Deficit

611,954 635,518 (23,565) 556,305 671,185 730,396 765,109 (208,804)

100.10,15 ‐ classroom 146,457 176,478 (30,021) 144,182 182,764 200,431 219,947 (75,765)

200.10,15 ‐ teaching lab 108,338 106,585 1,753 91,830 110,382 121,052 132,839 (41,010)

200.20, 25 ‐ open lab 76,300 50,922 25,377 66,752 52,736 57,834 63,465 3,287

700.11 ‐ e‐learning support 0 5,129 (5,129) 0 5,311 6,159 6,756 (6,756)

LIBRARY/STUDY 400 108,491 136,254 (27,763) 109,305 141,108 154,748 169,816 (60,511)

400‐ Study/ Library 108,491 136,254 (27,763) 109,305 141,108 154,748 169,816 (60,511)

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 300 171,142 166,559 4,583 151,611 174,649 182,739 182,739 (31,128)

300.10, 15 ‐Administrative office 171,142 166,559 4,583 151,611 174,649 182,739 182,739 (31,128)0

215,284 182,979 32,305 208,162 189,428 207,553 229,763 (21,601)

500.10 ‐ armory 156 156 0 156 161 177 194 (38)

500.50,55 ‐ demonstration 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,714 (1,714)

500.60 ‐ field building 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

ACADEMIC 110, 210, 220, 300, 711

TOTAL SPACE ON CAMPUS (IN ASSIGNABLE SQUARE FEET‐ ASF) W/ HAMILTON, MED SCI, BIO SCI, M&M, HEALTH SCI,FINE ARTS &

COMMUNITY BLDG DEMOLISHED

STUDENT SUPPORT 610‐660, 680‐690, 800

100.10,15 ‐classroom

200.10,15 ‐teaching lab

200.20, 25 ‐ openlab

700.11 ‐ e‐learningsupport

CURRENT 146,457 108,338 76,300 0FUTURE EXISTING 144,182 91,830 66,752 0GUIDELINE 176,478 106,585 50,922 5,129SHORT TERM 182,764 110,382 52,736 5,311MID TERM 200,431 121,052 57,834 6,159

0

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

300,000

350,000

400,000

ASSIGNAB

LE SQUAR

E FEET

ACADEMIC SPACE NEEDS PROJECTIONS

100.10,15 ‐classroom

200.10,15 ‐teaching lab

200.20, 25 ‐ openlab

700.11 ‐ e‐learningsupport

CURRENT 146,457 108,338 76,300 0FUTURE EXISTING 144,182 91,830 66,752 0GUIDELINE 176,478 106,585 50,922 5,129SHORT TERM 182,764 110,382 52,736 5,311MID TERM 200,431 121,052 57,834 6,159

0

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

300,000

350,000

400,000

ASSIGNAB

LE SQUAR

E FEET

ACADEMIC SPACE NEEDS PROJECTIONS


SCHEDULE


PROCESS SCHEDULE

Project Start-Up

RFIs Stakeholder ID Meeting Set-Up

Initiation+Analysis

MAY SEPT JANUARY

EngagementConcept Development

Phasing + Prioritization

Refinement + Documentation

Visioning Workshop

Leadership Team

Update

Synthesized Concepts

Board Review

Leadership Team

Update

Campus Forums

Submit Final Report

TeamKick-off

Tours + Interviews

MAY

Steering Committee Kick-off

Review Preliminary

Findings

Board Review +

Vote

Deliver Final

Products

Campus Forums

Issue Analysis Report

Final Concept Review

Cost Model


DATESMONTH EVENTS

September 2016 Planning Committee Kick-Off

October 2016 Planning Committee Review Individual Stakeholder meetings Campus Forums (3 sessions, 1.5 hours each)

November 2016 Planning Committee meeting (3 hours) Issue Final Campus and Space Needs Analysis Report –

Existing Campus

December 2016 Planning Committee Review (2 hours) Administrative Council Update (2 hours) Hope College Review Comments delivered

January 2017 Board of Trustees Review (January 26) Planning Committee Re-Cap Session (January 26)

February 2017 Planning Committee meeting (3 hours) Stakeholder meetings (6 at around 1.5 hours each)

March 2017 Final meeting with Planning Committee Administrative Council Update Issue Final Campus Master Plan Report – Future Campus Project Leadership Report to Executive Committee

April 2017 Issue Final Campus Master Plan Report (April 22)

May 2017 Board Review – Final Presentation and Approval (May4/5)

Deliver final reports and digital documents (May 31)


hope college campus master planning process · hope college campus master planning process hope...

Documents