homelessness partnering strategy community plan 2014–2019 ... · homelessness partnering strategy...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Homelessness Partnering Strategy Community Plan 2014–2019: Small Designated Communities1
1 The small designated community analyzed the 2014-2019 HPS Community Plans submitted by 51 cities that are eligible for HPS funding under the Designated Communities stream: St. John’s, Charlottetown and Summerside, Sydney-Cape Breton, Saint John, Fredericton, Moncton, Bathurst, London, Waterloo - Kitchener, Durham (Oshawa), Halton, Peel, St. Catharines-Niagara, Sudbury, Windsor, York Region, Guelph, Dufferin,Brantford,Barrie(Simcoe),Belleville,Nipissing-NorthBay,Peterborough,Kingston,SaultSte.Marie,ThunderBay,Brandon, Thompson,Regina,Saskatoon,andPrinceAlbert,RedDeer,WoodBuffalo,Lethbridge,MedicineHat,GrandePrairie,Victoria,Kelowna, Nanaimo, Prince George, Kamloops, Nelson, Whitehorse, Yellowknife, Iqaluit, Toronto (Aboriginal), Ottawa (Aboriginal), Hamilton (Aboriginal),ThunderBay(Aboriginal),Calgary(Aboriginal)andVancouver(Aboriginal)
2 The large city analysis was a summary of the 2014-2019 HPS Community Plans submitted by eight large cities that are eligible for HPS funding undertheDesignatedCommunitiesstream:Halifax,Ottawa,Toronto,Hamilton,Winnipeg,Calgary,Edmonton,andVancouver
IntroductionThe Homelessness Partnering Strategy (HPS) is a community-basedprogramaimedatpreventingandreducinghomelessnessbyprovidingdirectsupportand funding to 61 designated communities across Canada, and by supporting them in the implementation of a Housing First (HF) approach to address chronic and episodic homelessness.
This portrait is a summary of the HPS 2014–2019 community plans submitted by small designated communities2. This summary complements the large cityanalysis,anditprovidesaggregatedandcomparativefiguresofthesmalldesignatedcommunities.
FindingsCommunities are inclusive and ready to address gapsCommunitiesheldbroadconsultationstodeveloptheirHPSCommunityPlansincludingvariousstakeholdersandsectorsinvolvedinaddressinghomelessnessissues.TheCommunityAdvisoryBoard(CAB) of each community also includes broad representationacrosssectors.However,inthesecommunities, representation could be broadened by includinglandlordassociations,peoplewithlived
experience of homelessness, the police/corrections sector,andthoseinvolvedinthedeliveryofincomesupports. Consequently, most communities indicated sectors where their CAB should include representation.
Communities are partneringTodemonstratethattheyhavemobilizedpartners tocontributetotheirhomelessnessefforts,communities must identify at least one dollar from other sources contributing towards to their homelessnesseffortsforeverydollaroftheirannualfunding allocation under the HPS Designated Communities funding stream. In their plans, communitieshaveidentifiedfundingfromvariouspartnerssuchas:governments(Federal,Provincial/Territorial or Municipal/Regional); public institutions, suchashospitals,schoolsoruniversities;Aboriginalorganizations;privatesectororganizations;andnot-for-profit/charitablesectororganizations,suchasfoundations. Community Entities (CE) are required to reportannuallyontheactualamountreceived.
The following chart shows that the community contribution in the small designated communities mainlycomesfromProvincial/Territorialgovernments(Figure1).
2
Communities are implementing Housing First from varying starting points
As part of the community planning process, communitiesidentifiedprioritiesforlocalHPS
investments.ManysmalldesignatedcommunitieswithanHFinvestmenttargetstartingonApril1,2016havechosentoallocateinvestmentstoHFinthefirstyear(2014–2015),focusingonthechronically and episodically homeless population groups.
Figure 2 shows how small designated communities will allocate their HPS funding (excluding CommunityEntityadministrativecost)amongtheprioritiesfrom2014to2015.Investmentsinsmalldesignated communities will focus mostly on activitiesrelatedtoservices,HF,andfacilities.SmalldesignatedcommunitieswithoutanHFinvestmenttargettendedtoinvestmoreinservices(66%onaverage),whilesmalldesignatedcommunitieswithanAboriginalhomelessplaninvestedmoreinfacilities(33%onaverage).
Additionally, compared to larger cities, Figure 2 shows that small designated communities appear to investalargerportionofHFfundinginHFreadinessandasmallerportionincasemanagementservices.
Housing First (HF)21%
Services49%
Facilities20%
Data4%
Data, Trackingand Monitoring
Intake andAssessment
HF Readiness
CaseManagementServices
Connection toPermanent Housing
6%
34%
17%
13%
29%
Coordination andLeverage
5%
Figure 2 : HPS 2014–2015 Annual Investments by Priorities in Small Designated Communities (% of HPS Funding Allocation)
Figure 1: Community Contribution Sources in Small Designated Communities by Type of Funders
%ofcommunitycontributionamount outside HPS Funding
68%16%
5%9%
0.2%
1%
Provincial / TerritorialGovernment
City / Municipality
Not for Profit / Charity
Foundations
For Profit / Private Sector
Other
3
Thechartbelowoutlinestheinvestmentssmalldesignated communities and communities with Aboriginal Homelessness plans expect to make in each priority from 2015 to 2019. Small designated communitieswithaHFinvestmenttargetwillgenerallyinvestover50%onHF.CommunitieswithoutaHFinvestmenttargetplantoinvest20%on HF. In small designated communities with an AboriginalHomelessnessplan,40%oftheirallocationwillbeinvestedtowardsHF(Figure3).
Communities are addressing the needs of homeless and at-risk population groups
The Community Plan also asked communities to select priorities not related to HF. Small designated communitiesexpecttofocusonvariousactivitiestosupport population groups who are homeless or at imminent risk of homelessness. More than two-thirds of the small designated communities identifiedthefollowingactivitiesfortheirprioritiesnot dedicated to HF: liaise and refer to appropriate resources,housinglossprevention,connectingclients to income supports, housing placements (outsideHF),andlifeskillsdevelopment(e.g.budgeting, cooking).
While HF targets chronic and episodic homelessness,smalldesignatedcommunitieshaveidentifiedspecificpopulationsfornon-HFactivities.Themaingroupsidentifiedbymostsmalldesignatedcommunitiesintheirnon-HFservicepriorities include: the general population, Aboriginal people, youth, families and children.
Finally, small designated communities are also addressing the needs of key target populations through capital projects not related to HF (i.e. building,renovatingorpurchasingfacilities).Through this priority, the main groups targeted include: the general population, Aboriginal people, youth, and people with a mental health issue.
Conclusion and Next StepsThrough their community planning process, small designatedcommunitieshavedemonstratedanearly interest to implement HF under HPS. For the 2014–2019 period, communities are implementing projects that best address key priorities. A mid-year dialogue with communities is underway to assess progress and determine what additional supports communities may need to successfully implement HF and meet their target. At the end of each year, communities will report on project outcomes and submit an annual Community Plan update.
34%
44% 44%45%
41%
6%6%
5%4%
5%5%
5%5%
37% 37% 37%
2015–2016 2016–2017 2017–2018 2018–2019
14%9% 9% 9%
Housing First (HF) Services Facilities Coordination and Leverage Data
Figure 3: HPS 2015–2019 Annual Investments by Priorities Among Small Designated Communities