home history: realty professionals and stigma disclosure professional liability defense federation...
TRANSCRIPT
HOME HISTORY: REALTY PROFESSIONALS
AND STIGMA DISCLOSURE
Professional Liability Defense Federation
2013 Annual Meeting and Presentation
October 9-10, 2013Jay Barry Harris, Esquire
Fineman Krekstein & Harris
CAVEAT EMPTER
Obligation of inquiryRecession not permittedExceptions◦Material defects affecting the value of the property
◦Varies by jurisdiction
PSYCHOLOGICAL DAMAGE
Death, violent crime on the property
Stigma attaches to property and devalues it, but not a material defect
STIGMATIZED PROPERTY – THREE APPROACHES
No duty to disclose - Pennsylvania
Duty to disclose - CaliforniaNo duty to disclose absent
inquiry from the buyer - Ohio
NO DUTY TO DISCLOSE
PA Real Estate Disclosure Law – details what must be disclosed
Suicide, homicide, violent crime – not on the list
SIMPLE ANALYSIS
Not listed in the statute; no duty to disclose
Allegations of fraud are irrelevant
Seller’s and agent’s knowledge is irrelevant
If a contractor cannot cure it, simply not relevant
DIFFICULT ANALYSIS
Passage of time, damage recedes, unlike structural damage
Psychological impact varies by individual
Slippery slope◦Types of crime◦Location of crime
DIFFICULT ANALYSIS
Intangible – speculative expert opinions
Duration – passage of time mitigates damage
Internet – keeping bad news “alive”
SUBJECTIVE STANDARD IMPOSED UPON SELLER
Facts materially altering value or desirability of property
Accessible only to sellerUnknown to buyer
NO DUTY TO DISCLOSE ABSENT BUYER INQUIRYSeller, no duty to disclose
unless an exception existsLatent defect coupled with
misrepresentation and concealment
Trend towards full disclosure of stigmatized property
MISREPRESENTATION OR NON DISCLOSURE
Material – aware it is important to buyer
Must respond by inquiry with full disclosure
IMPACT OF HIV
HIV positive person occupied house
Statutory requirement to disclose, even in “no duty to disclose states”