heritage & location time, space & semantics ldbcldbc amsterdam, april 3rd 2014...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 2: Heritage & Location Time, space & semantics LDBCLDBC Amsterdam, April 3rd 2014 rein.vantveer@den.nl](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022083005/56649f265503460f94c3de7d/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Heritage & Location
• Project by Digital Heritage Netherlands & many (heritage) institutions: RCE, SBNL, Waag soc etc
• Semantics
o Spatial
o Temporal
o Thematic
• Tools for visualization, crowdsourcing
• Open source, open data (where possible)
• Sustainable business model
![Page 3: Heritage & Location Time, space & semantics LDBCLDBC Amsterdam, April 3rd 2014 rein.vantveer@den.nl](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022083005/56649f265503460f94c3de7d/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
SpatialSpatial triple stores under investigation
• uSeekM http://erfgeo.nl/geosparql/geosparql-demo.html
• Strabon http://erfgeo.nl/geosparql/strabon-demo.html
• Virtuoso http://erfgeo.nl/geosparql/vos-demo.html
• Dataset:
• 13,014 Dutch archaeological monuments (polygon)
• 121,805 archaeological ‘observations’ (point)
• Operations:
• simple spatial filter
• spatial join observation points on monuments polygons
![Page 4: Heritage & Location Time, space & semantics LDBCLDBC Amsterdam, April 3rd 2014 rein.vantveer@den.nl](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022083005/56649f265503460f94c3de7d/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Why is this important to us?
• Simple spatial filterMunicipality:Amsterdam OWL:sameAs http://sws.geonames.org/2759793/: 1 current place
• Spatial joinhttp://www.gemeentegeschiedenis.nl/gemeentenaam/Amsterdamor use translated version: 8 contours (multipolygon)
Heritage & Location must be able to include (join) results from all previous ‘versions’ of a place
![Page 5: Heritage & Location Time, space & semantics LDBCLDBC Amsterdam, April 3rd 2014 rein.vantveer@den.nl](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022083005/56649f265503460f94c3de7d/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Limited results
Store H&L uSeekM PiLOD Virtuoso Test repo Strabon
Implementation Not optimised Not optimised Optimised?
Simple spatial filter Good Reasonable Not so good
‘Point in Polygon’spatial join
Not so good Work in progress Good (how is this possible???)
Disclaimer: there is no general validity for these results whatsoever!Consult a proper spatial benchmark for reliable results.
![Page 6: Heritage & Location Time, space & semantics LDBCLDBC Amsterdam, April 3rd 2014 rein.vantveer@den.nl](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022083005/56649f265503460f94c3de7d/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Time
Consider dates before Christ (BC/ Before Common Era - BCE)
● W3 Time Ontology: “temporal content of Web pages and the temporal properties of Web services”
● CIDOC-CRM ontology: E50_Date datatype XSD:string "1900"; "4-4-1959"; "19-MAR-1922"; "19640604" is hard to implement
● Timeline ontology: atDate^^XSD:date → “Turns out almost no C library handles ISO 8601 dates before 1900.”
● Is Strabon or any other LD store able to handle:“Time:A Time:within Time:B” - a temporal join?
Erm, help?