heritage & location time, space & semantics ldbcldbc amsterdam, april 3rd 2014...

6
Heritage & Location Time, space & semantics LDBC Amsterdam, April 3rd 2014 [email protected]

Upload: william-obrien

Post on 05-Jan-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Heritage & Location Time, space & semantics LDBCLDBC Amsterdam, April 3rd 2014 rein.vantveer@den.nl

Heritage & LocationTime, space & semantics

LDBC Amsterdam, April 3rd [email protected]

Page 2: Heritage & Location Time, space & semantics LDBCLDBC Amsterdam, April 3rd 2014 rein.vantveer@den.nl

Heritage & Location

• Project by Digital Heritage Netherlands & many (heritage) institutions: RCE, SBNL, Waag soc etc

• Semantics

o Spatial

o Temporal

o Thematic

• Tools for visualization, crowdsourcing

• Open source, open data (where possible)

• Sustainable business model

Page 3: Heritage & Location Time, space & semantics LDBCLDBC Amsterdam, April 3rd 2014 rein.vantveer@den.nl

SpatialSpatial triple stores under investigation

• uSeekM http://erfgeo.nl/geosparql/geosparql-demo.html

• Strabon http://erfgeo.nl/geosparql/strabon-demo.html

• Virtuoso http://erfgeo.nl/geosparql/vos-demo.html

• Dataset:

• 13,014 Dutch archaeological monuments (polygon)

• 121,805 archaeological ‘observations’ (point)

• Operations:

• simple spatial filter

• spatial join observation points on monuments polygons

Page 4: Heritage & Location Time, space & semantics LDBCLDBC Amsterdam, April 3rd 2014 rein.vantveer@den.nl

Why is this important to us?

• Simple spatial filterMunicipality:Amsterdam OWL:sameAs http://sws.geonames.org/2759793/: 1 current place

• Spatial joinhttp://www.gemeentegeschiedenis.nl/gemeentenaam/Amsterdamor use translated version: 8 contours (multipolygon)

Heritage & Location must be able to include (join) results from all previous ‘versions’ of a place

Page 5: Heritage & Location Time, space & semantics LDBCLDBC Amsterdam, April 3rd 2014 rein.vantveer@den.nl

Limited results

Store H&L uSeekM PiLOD Virtuoso Test repo Strabon

Implementation Not optimised Not optimised Optimised?

Simple spatial filter Good Reasonable Not so good

‘Point in Polygon’spatial join

Not so good Work in progress Good (how is this possible???)

Disclaimer: there is no general validity for these results whatsoever!Consult a proper spatial benchmark for reliable results.

Page 6: Heritage & Location Time, space & semantics LDBCLDBC Amsterdam, April 3rd 2014 rein.vantveer@den.nl

Time

Consider dates before Christ (BC/ Before Common Era - BCE)

● W3 Time Ontology: “temporal content of Web pages and the temporal properties of Web services”

● CIDOC-CRM ontology: E50_Date datatype XSD:string "1900"; "4-4-1959"; "19-MAR-1922"; "19640604" is hard to implement

● Timeline ontology: atDate^^XSD:date → “Turns out almost no C library handles ISO 8601 dates before 1900.”

● Is Strabon or any other LD store able to handle:“Time:A Time:within Time:B” - a temporal join?

Erm, help?