heritage-based arts and models of engagement and learning emily dawson [email protected] art,...

13
Heritage-based arts and models of engagement and learning Emily Dawson [email protected] Art, Culture & Education

Upload: eugene-gilbert

Post on 29-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Heritage-based arts and models of engagement and learning

Emily [email protected]

Art, Culture & Education

Session outline

• Introductions • Small group discussions of readings• Emerging models of engagement: Learning,

Civic space, Collective memory, Participation• Pop-up museum• Opportunities and tensions for participatory

learning practices in cultural settings• Further resources

In small groups….Discuss the 3 readings & then we will feedback• Lynch, B. (2011). Whose cake is it anyway? A collaborative investigation into

engagement and participation in 12 museums and galleries in the UK. London: Paul Hamlyn Foundation. Accessed http://www.phf.org.uk/page.asp?id=1417

• Simon, N. (2010.). The Participatory Museum. Santa Cruz: Museum 2.0. Chapter 1. Principles of participation.

• Gurian, E. (2006). Civilizing the museum: the collected writings of Elaine Heumann Gurian. Abingdon and New York: Routledge. Chapter 19: The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: History or metaphor.

Questions to discuss1) What values are they suggesting?2) What practices are being described?3) What models of engagement do they discuss?4) Which of these values/practices/models do you subscribe to?5) Are there any that you disagree with?

Emerging models of engagement:• Historically Heritage and Arts

institutions have invoked mixed values ranging from elitism and status (the collections of the aristocracy) to learning (the early V&A) and democracy (the early Louvre)

• Today: Learning, Collective memory, Civic space, ParticipationThese are all concepts with long histories but also operate within the cultural sector as contemporary trends

• Learning…what do you remember from Jen’s sessions?

Learning• Dominant models in Heritage-based arts is constructivist

model of learning• Falk and Dierking’s three part contextual model • Problem: often underdeveloped as concept & practice

Collective memory & 3rd/Civic SpaceValues:• Shared cultural heritage (s)?• Remembering and honouring the

past, whether positive (arts) or negative (genocide)

• Community building

Tensions• Spoils of war? (British Museum)• Exclusivity and cultural heritage,

‘them and us’• Exclusion: rhetoric of ‘culture for all’,

but actually, ‘culture for the few’

Pics/examples

Participation as current ‘trend’

• Participation = buzzword• Can be found in funding

documents, institutional policies, academic research and heritage-based arts practice

• Currently seems to be cross sector (i.e. science, arts, politics etc)

• Anyone seen/heard of any particularly interesting participatory projects?

ParticipationValues:• Constructivist learning + participatory

democracy ideal = participatory cultural practices (Freire, Cruickshank)

• Community building• Inclusive practice breaks down

institutional, curatorial, professional and audience barriers

Tensions:• Tokenism in power sharing (who makes

‘real’ decisions, and who gets paid?) (Lynch)

• ‘using’ people for institutional ends• Thin veneer of ‘participation’• Assumes participation is what people

want (Simon, p. 9)

Pics examples

Participatory PitfallsQuestions• How could you design a

participatory project?• What indicators would tell

you it had been participatory?• Why would a participatory

project be worth pursuing?• Does participatory work

devalue the professionalism and expertise of those in the heritage and arts sectors?

Further resourcesVisit:

– The Grant Museum, UCL– Museum of London (various galleries)– The Imperial War Museum (any gallery, and then the peace garden)– South London Gallery

Read:• Bourdieu, P., Darbel, A., & Schnapper, D. (1990). The love of art: European art museums and

their public. Stanford, CA.: Stanford University Press.• Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture (R. Nice,

Trans. Second ed.). London, Newbury Park CA, New Delhi: Sage.• Duncan, C. (1993). The aesthetics of power: essays in the critical art history. Cambridge and

New York: Cambridge University Press.• Gurian, E. (2006). Civilizing the museum: the collected writings of Elaine Heumann Gurian.

Abingdon and New York: Routledge.• Lavine, S. D., & Karp, I. (1991). Introduction: Museums and multiculturalism. In I. Karp & S.

Lavine, D (Eds.), Exhibiting Cultures: The poetics and politics of museum display (pp. 1-10). Washington D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.

• Lynch, B. T., & Alberti, S. J. M. M. (2010). Legacies of prejudice: Racism, co-production and radical trust in the museum. Museum Management and Curatorship, 25(1), 13-35.

• Simon, N. (2010.). The Participatory Museum. Santa Cruz: Museum 2.0.