heavy quark system near tc
DESCRIPTION
Heavy quark system near Tc. Su Houng Lee In collaboration with Kenji Morita Also, thanks to group members: Present: T. Song, K.I. Kim, W.S. Park, H. Park, K. Jeong Former: K. Ohnishi, S. Yasui, Y. Song. Early work on J/ y (Hashimoto, Miyamura, Hirose, Kanki). - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
Heavy quark system near Tc
Su Houng Lee In collaboration with Kenji Morita
Also, thanks to group members:
Present: T. Song, K.I. Kim, W.S. Park, H. Park, K. Jeong
Former: K. Ohnishi, S. Yasui, Y. Song
S H Lee 2
Early work on J/ (Hashimoto, Miyamura, Hirose, Kanki)
rr
rrV s )(
3
4)(
)(GeV 2
small
r
b decdec /)0()( TTTT
dec/TT
S H Lee 3
J/ in Quark-gluon plasma
• Matsui and Satz: J/ will dissolve at Tc due to color screening
• Lattice MEM : Asakawa, Hatsuda, Karsch, Petreczky ….
J/ will survive Tc and dissolve at 2 Tc
• Potential models (Wong …) :
Consistent with MEM Wong.
• Refined Potential models with lattice (Mocsy, Petreczky…)
: J/will dissolve slightly above Tc
• Lattice after zero mode subtraction (WHOT-QCD)
: J/wave function hardly changes at 2.3 Tc
• AdS/QCD (Kim, Lee, Fukushima ..)
: J/mass change
• And so on ……….
S H Lee 4
Comparison with experimental data of RHIC (√s=200 GeV at midrapidity)
T. Song (preliminary)
S H Lee 5
Some perspectives on sQGP and
relation to deconfinement
S H Lee 6
Some perspectives from Lattice data on ( , p) near Tc
Karsch hep-lat/0106019
pGGM
pGGM
3 8
11
ST
0
2
T
20
T2
Lattice data (Karsch et al) vs. Resummed perturbation (Blaizot et al.)
Operator representation: Gluon condensates
sQGPJ/
sQGP
S H Lee 7
)0()(4
100 MTMB c
02
02
4
1
4
1
4
1
4
3
MMp
MM
42 MeV 1898
9
4
1
G
0.3 0
2G
SHLee PRD40,2484(89)
Dominated by non perturbative change at Tc
M0 and Bag pressure
M0 and Gluon condensate 00
2
T
2
11
8 MGG
GeV4
T
2G
S H Lee 8
20
T
2
20T
2
4
3
9
2
4
3
9
2
MT
MB
MT
ME
s
s
Relation to Electric and Magnetic condensate
Relation to deconfinement
< E2 >T
< B2 >T =0
W(S-T)
W(S-S)
Time
Space
Space
L
L
OPE 1- </ E2> (ST)2 +…
OPE 1- </ B2> (SS)2 +…
exp(- V(T))
1
2
2
d
1
32
2
d
/
2
3
32
/
22
3
32
TEk
TEk
k
k
e
k
E
kB
e
mk
E
kE
Kaczmarek et al (prd04)
S H Lee 9
Heavy quark system in sQGP
OPE, QCD Stark Effect, and
QCD sum rules
S H Lee 10
MIT Bag
B
Vacuum with negative pressure
QCD vacuum
sQGP at Tc
0
2
Tc
2 7.0 GG
4
0
2 GeV 35.0G Large increase in E2
Heavy quark system near Tc
S H Lee 11
)0(),()( ccxccdxeq iqx
Heavy quark correlation function (q2)
..)12(4
),(...)(
2222
21
0
n
n Gqxqm
xqFdxq
• OPE makes sense when 2
vacuum
22 G 4 QCDqm
Definition
Operator product expansion (OPE)
qc
c
nG
2
medium
22 G 4 aTqm QCD
• Even at finite temperature or as long as
S H Lee 12
02 q
nn
n Gm
Cq
2
2
4)0(
222 2 4 QCDmqm
q2=0 : photo production of open charm
q2=m2J/ : OPE for bound state (Peskin 79)
c
c
nG
222 4 QCDQm
-q2 >0 : QCD sum rules for heavy quarks
22 4 QCDm
S H Lee 13
02 q
222 2 4 QCDmqm
q2=m2J/ : OPE for bound state (Peskin 79)
c
c
nG
S H Lee 14
qc
c
OPE for bound state: m infinity
)( || ),( 16/ 24220 mgOkmgOgNm c
QCD 2nd order Stark Effect : > qcd
T
J Emaxx
xdx
am 2
20
6
2/3
0
20
2/
1
)1(9
128
Attractive for ground state
T/Tc 1.0 1.05 0
mJ/ -44 MeV -105 MeV 311 MeV
m -4.3 MeV -10 MeV 580 MeV
)1( ))()((
)(2244
3242 O
mgmgmg
mgmgg
c
c
c
c
S H Lee 15
2nd order Stark effect from pNRQCD
LO Singlet potential from pNRQCD : Brambilla et al.
S O
Derivation
1/r > Binding > QCD,
• Take expectation value
• Large Nc limit
• Static condensate
• Energy
•
S H Lee 16
02 q
c
c
nG
222 4 QCDQm
-q2 >0 : QCD sum rules for heavy quarks
S H Lee 17
n
n
n Qs
sdsJQJ
dQ
dM
)(
)()0(),(
22
n
J
J
JJ
n
n
m
m
f
mmm
M
M
2'
2/
/
2/
2'2
/1
Q2=-q2>0, QCD sum rules for Heavy quark system
OPE
..
4!
)!4(1 22
2
c
nnm
G
n
naM
Phenomenological side
..
12
'
2/
/2/
n
JJn
J
n m
mcf
mM
s
J/
’
n
n
M
M 12with G
02 G
sum rule at T=0 : can take any Q2 >=0, 2
vacuum
22 G 4 QCDQm
S H Lee 18
Matching Mn-1/Mn from Phen to OPE
Obtain constraint for mJ/ and
OPE
.......................
4!
)!4(1 22
2
c
nnm
G
n
naM
Phenomenological side
222/
)(
sms
sfs
J
s
J/
’
<G2>+c<G2>
nn Qs
sdsM
)(
)(2
n
n
M
M 1
<G2
><G2>
sum rule near TcT
GQm 0
22 G 4
S H Lee 19
QCD sum rule constraint (Morita, Lee 08)
MeV
]
MeV
]mMeV]
mMeV]
)(
!
112
22
n
n
Qs
sdsQ
dQ
d
n
S H Lee 20
Summary
=constraint-m (Stark effect)
GeV
/JM
QCD sum rule limit with =0
m from QCD Stark Effect
GeV
/J
Mass and width of J/ near Tc (Morita, Lee 08)
NLO QCD Song (07)
T/Tc
(
MeV
)
S H Lee 21
Prediction from the bottom-up AdS/QCD model
YK, J.-P. Lee, and S. H. Lee, PRD (2007)
Deconfinement + temperature effects.Effect of gluon condensate is missing. So, above Tc detailed study about the competition between the temperature and
gluon condensate should be done .
S H Lee 22
SummaryS-wave vs. P-waves
OPE breaks down
S H Lee 23
Summary bb system
S H Lee 24
1. Expected mass shift for J/ is order 50 MeV at Tc
Experimental observation from RHIC is difficult at present
2. Larger effect for excited states
3. Small effect for but larger b
S H Lee 25
NN
NN
N
mxdxxGm
mm
0.45 ),( M
MeV 750 N|(Chiral)T|N M ,N|Op|N2
Op Op
22
000n.m.
• Linear density approximation
• Gluon condensate at finite density
n.m.0
22 0.061-1
GG
05
Gluon condensate in nuclear matter
RHIC energy scan
FAIR
S H Lee 26
Quantum numbers
QCD 2nd Stark eff.
Potential model
QCD sum rules
Effects of DD loop
c0-+ –8 MeV –5 MeV
(Klingl, SHL ,Weise,
Morita)
No effect
J/ 1-- –8 MeV(Peskin, Luke)
-10 MeV(Brodsky et al).
–7 MeV(Klingl,
SHL ,Weise, Morita)
<2 MeV(SHL, Ko)
c0,1,2++ -40 MeV -15 MeV
(Morita, Lee)
No effect on chi_1
(3686)
1-- -100 MeV < 30 MeV
(3770)
1-- -140 MeV < 30 MeV
Other approaches for mass shift in nuclear matter
S H Lee 27
Anti proton
4 to 6 GeV/ck
Heavy nuclei
3 2
11.2
0.17 5fm
fm fm
e
e
Observation of m through p-A reaction
Expected luminosity at GSI 2x 1032cm-2s-1
Can be done at J-PARC
S H Lee 28
1. Properties of QQ system in sQGP is still controversial
3. Partial observation at nuclear matter through p A reaction might be possible. FAIR, J-PARC
2. The mass and width will suddenly change at Tc different for s p wave and bottonium can probe confinement physics
Summary
4. A new constraint for heavy quark system near Tc