heart valve dynamics during the complete cardiac cycle · heart valve dynamics during the complete...
TRANSCRIPT
-
Heart Valve Dynamics during the Complete
Cardiac Cycle
Dumont K1, Vierendeels J
2, Segers P
1, Verdonck PR
1
1Hydraulics Laboratory, Institute of Biomedical
Technology, UGent, Belgium 2Department of Flow, Heat and Combustion Mechanics,
Fluid Mechanics Laboratory, UGent, Belgium
Introduction In vitro studies on the Advancing The Standard (ATS)
valve (ATS Medical, Minneapolis, MN) have shown
that the valve opens to the maximum opening angle
when it is placed in a straight conduit, but that the valve
leaflets open to a less than maximum opening angle
when the valve is placed in a diverging conduit, such as
when it is placed in mitral position [1].
Methods
We have studied valve leaflet behaviour using a new
computational fluid-structure interaction (FSI) model
[2,3] making use of Fluent software, extended with
dedicated user-defined function to account for the FSI.
A three dimensional (3D) model of the ATS valve was
studied in 2 geometries, simulating the valve in a
straight conduit and a conduit with a sudden expansion
downstream of the valve. The velocity profile, used as
inflow boundary condition, has a peak velocity of 1 m/s,
a period of 2 seconds, with forward flow during 1
second.
A. 'straight' geometry
B. 'expanding' geometry
Figure 1: Studied Geometries of the ATS valve.
Figure 2: Boundary Condition : Velocity Inlet.
Results
In the straight conduit, the ATS valve opens to the
maximum opening angle in 0.147 s and remains in that
position for 0.702 s. The peak pressure gradient over the
valve is 3.5 mmHg. In the expanding conduit, the valve
opens to the maximum opening angle but remains in
this position only for 0.092 seconds, after which it
moves toward a more closed position. The average
opening angle is 69.7 degrees. Peak pressure gradient
over the valve is 2.8 mmHg.
Figure 3: Pathlines at t=0.6s in both geometries,
coloured with respect to pressure gradients.
Figure 4: Leaflet Excursions and Pressure Gradients in
both geometries.
Discussion and Conclusion
Our numerical study confirms that valve hemodynamics
and leaflet excursion depend on the geometrical
constraint of the valve: the presence of a diverging flow
results in less than maximum opening of the valve
leaflets [1] and reduces the peak pressure gradient.
The inlet boundary condition was based on a validation
study [3]. Although the model has shown its ability of
modelling the dynamic behaviour of mechanical heart
valves, future work using physiological boundary
conditions could lead to more interesting insights.
This new FSI model will be a major research tool to
unravel the hemodynamics associated with thrombolytic
and hemolytic events of existing and new mechanical
heart valves.
References [1] Feng Z., Umezu M., Fujimoto T., Tsukahara T., Nurishi
M. and Kawaguchi D. In vitro hydrodynamic characteristics
among three bileaflet valves in the mitral position. Artificial
Organs Volume 24 Number 5, 346–354, 2000. [2] Vierendeels, J., Dumont, K. and Verdonck, P. Stabilization
of a fluid-structure coupling procedure for rigid body motion.
33rd AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit AIAA–
2003–3720, 23–26 june 2003, Orlando, US, 2003. [3] Dumont K., Stijnen J., Vierendeels J., van de Vosse F. and
Verdonck P. Validation of a fluid-structure interaction model
of a heart valve using the dynamic mesh method in fluent.
accepted for publication in Computer Methods in
Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering 2004.