hearing & deafness (3) auditory localisation

29
Hearing & Deafness (3) Auditory Localisation http://www.aip.org/pt/nov99/ locsound.html

Upload: mary-mills

Post on 28-Mar-2015

224 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Hearing & Deafness (3) Auditory Localisation

Hearing & Deafness (3)

Auditory Localisation

http://www.aip.org/pt/nov99/locsound.html

Page 2: Hearing & Deafness (3) Auditory Localisation

Localisation in 3 dimensions

• Azimuth (left/right) (Arab. as-sumut, i.e. as = al the + sumut, pl of samt way)

– Binaural cues: ITD and ILD

• Median-plane (front, up, back, down)

– Pinna-induced spectral cues

– Head movements

• Distance

– Absolute level, excess IID (inverse-square law),

spectral balance, reverberation

Page 3: Hearing & Deafness (3) Auditory Localisation

Interaural Level Difference (ILD)

Processed in Lateral Superior Olive

From David McAlpine

Page 4: Hearing & Deafness (3) Auditory Localisation

ILD is greater for higher frequencies

Interaural level differences calculated for a source in the horizontal plane. The source is at an azimuth of 10° (green curve), 45° (red), or 90° (blue) relative to straight ahead.

The calculations assume that the ears are at opposite poles of a rigid sphere.

Page 5: Hearing & Deafness (3) Auditory Localisation

Anatomy of the auditory system

Page 6: Hearing & Deafness (3) Auditory Localisation

Interaural time-difference - ITD

t L

t R

ITD = t R - t L

Maximum c 0.6 ms

Page 7: Hearing & Deafness (3) Auditory Localisation
Page 8: Hearing & Deafness (3) Auditory Localisation

Interaural Time Difference (ITD)

Processed in Medial Superior Olive

From David McAlpine

Page 9: Hearing & Deafness (3) Auditory Localisation

The coincidence detection model of Jeffress (1948) is thewidely accepted model for low-frequency sound

localisation

Left Ear

Right Ear

From David McAlpine

Page 10: Hearing & Deafness (3) Auditory Localisation

Resp

onse

Interaural Time Difference0

Left Ear

Right Ear

From David McAlpine

Page 11: Hearing & Deafness (3) Auditory Localisation

Resp

onse

Interaural Time Difference0

Left Ear

Right Ear

From David McAlpine

Page 12: Hearing & Deafness (3) Auditory Localisation

Onset-time

versus

ongoing phase

differencesR L R

Natural sounds have both

Page 13: Hearing & Deafness (3) Auditory Localisation

Onset-time

versus

ongoing phase

differencesR L RNatural sounds have both

Works for high- and low-frequency sounds

Does not work for high-frequency pure tones:- no phase locking above 4kHz- phase ambiguity above 1.5 kHz

Page 14: Hearing & Deafness (3) Auditory Localisation

Phase-locking

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Inter-spike IntervalsResponse to Low Frequency tones

time (t)

Response to High Frequency tones > 5kHz

Random intervals

time (t)

2 periods 1 periodnerve spike

Page 15: Hearing & Deafness (3) Auditory Localisation

Phase Ambiguity

500 Hz: period = 2ms

L lags by 1.5 ms or L leads by 0.5 ms ?

R L R

This particular case is not a problem since max ITD = 0.6 ms

But for frequencies above 1500 Hz it IS a problem

Page 16: Hearing & Deafness (3) Auditory Localisation

Phase Ambiguity

2000 Hz: period = 0.5 ms

L lags by 0.3 ms or L leads by 0.2 ms ?

R L R

Both possible times are less than the maximum ITD of 0.6 ms

Page 17: Hearing & Deafness (3) Auditory Localisation

Anatomy of the auditory system

Page 18: Hearing & Deafness (3) Auditory Localisation

Raleigh’s Duplex theoryfor pure tones

• Low frequency pure tones (<1500 Hz) localised by interaural time differences

• High frequency pure tones localised by intensity differences

Page 19: Hearing & Deafness (3) Auditory Localisation

Raleigh’s Duplex theoryfor pure tones (2)

1. Low frequency tones (<1500 Hz) localised by phase differences:

• Very small interaural intensity difference for low-frequency tones.

•Phase locking present for low frequency tones (<4kHz).

Page 20: Hearing & Deafness (3) Auditory Localisation

Raleigh’s Duplex theoryfor pure tones (2)

1. Low frequency tones (<1500 Hz) localised by phase differences:

• Phase locking present for low frequency tones (<4kHz).

• Limited by phase ambiguity: Maximum ITD= 670 µs corresponding to a whole cycle at 1500 Hz (the upper limit for binaural phase sensitivity)

Page 21: Hearing & Deafness (3) Auditory Localisation

Raleigh’s Duplex theoryfor pure tones (3)

High (and close low) frequency tones localised by intensity differences

• Shadow cast by head greater at high (20 dB at 6 kHz) than low frequencies (3 dB at 500 Hz) i.e. head acts as a lowpass filter.

• For close sounds (<1.5m) the inverse square law gives intensity differences between the ears for all frequencies. These differences vary with azimuth independently of any head-shadow effect. Beyond 1.5m the difference in level between the ears due to this factor is less than 1 dB.

Page 22: Hearing & Deafness (3) Auditory Localisation

Azimuth for complex sounds

• Complex sounds contain both low and high frequencies

• But the dominant azimuth information is the ITDs of the low frequencies

Page 23: Hearing & Deafness (3) Auditory Localisation

Phase ambiguity not a problem for complex high-frequency tones

Freq 1800

1/200th sec

1600 2000

Page 24: Hearing & Deafness (3) Auditory Localisation

Precedence (or Haas) effect

Titrate blue ITD vs red ITD to center the single sound

Lots of red ITD needed to offset a little blue

Page 25: Hearing & Deafness (3) Auditory Localisation

Pinna notch

Page 26: Hearing & Deafness (3) Auditory Localisation

Head-Related Transfer Function: Median Plane

Page 27: Hearing & Deafness (3) Auditory Localisation

Anatomy of the auditory system

Page 28: Hearing & Deafness (3) Auditory Localisation

Distance

More distant sounds are:

• Quieter (inverse-square law)

• More muffled (high frequencies don’t travel so well)

• More reverberant (direct is quieter relative to reflected)

For very close sounds, the difference in distance from the source to the two ears becomes significant -> excess IID from inverse-square law.

Page 29: Hearing & Deafness (3) Auditory Localisation

Binaural masking level difference

Explain by simply Adding or subtracting the signals at the two ears (after adjusting their levels)

(Durlach’s Equalisation and Cancellation model)