head of environment radiation monitoring department. ukrainian hydrometeorological institute. kiev...

48
Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after the Chernobyl accident Sweden Society Radioecology Conference , 22-23 of March Voitsekhovych Oleg The Dnieper River Aquatic System Radioactive Contamination; 25 Years of Natural Attenuation and Remediation

Upload: britton-wiggins

Post on 11-Jan-2016

219 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after

Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department.

Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine

Radioecological research during 25 years after the Chernobyl accident

Sweden Society Radioecology Conference , 22-23 of March

Voitsekhovych Oleg

The Dnieper River Aquatic System Radioactive Contamination; 25 Years of

Natural Attenuation and Remediation

Page 2: Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after

Introduction

1. Radionuclide release and deposition

2. Radioactive contamination of the catchments and aquatic environment physical and chemical forms of radionuclides and its transformation

radionuclides in the aquatic systems surface waters (rivers and reservoirs),

groundwaters in the Chernobyl exclusion zone

marine system (Black Sea and global context)

3. Assessment of the water protection countermeasure Initial phase

Intermediate phase

Later phase and current situation

Chernobyl cooling pond decommissioning project

4. Radiation Dose and Risk assessment. Public perception and Assessment of the countermeasure effectiveness.

5. Lesson learned Key natural attenuation processes

Developments and validation of radionuclide transport model

Environment Radiation Monitoring strategies and methods development

Risk Assessment and Risk management at the radioactive contaminated lands.

Emergency preparedness aspects

Chernobyl Isotopes applications as markers for Environment studies

Scope of presentation

Page 3: Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after

Introduction• Twenty five years ago, an unprecedented large amount of radionuclides

were released into the environment due to the major accident at Unit 4 of Chernobyl NPP. As a result, the catchment areas and water bodies of the Dnieper River Basin (third largest aquatic system in a Europe) had been significantly contaminated, primarily due to 137Cs and 90Sr.

• In some cases, the level of radionuclides contamination in the water bodies returned to pre-accident conditions within the first decade following the accident, some aquatic ecosystems remained highly contaminated.

• This report presents the past twenty five year time-series data of water body contamination in Ukraine and the dynamic impacts caused by natural factors and human activities in the Chernobyl affected areas.

• This overview is trying to find answer on a question. What Have We Learned ?, assessing some successes and failures to mitigate water

contamination over post-accidental years

Page 4: Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after

On April, 26 198601:24

6

The information in Media in the first weeks

since the Accident did not described

adequately an actualsituation

Page 5: Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after

Ukraine

Chernobyl Accident is the Highest Single Release of Radionuclides into the Global Environment

• Airborne radionuclide transport >200,000 km2 of Europe with 137Cs >37 kBq/m2 (1 Ci/km2).

• Fuel particles—finely dispersed, low volatility, settled primarily within the ChEZ

• Condensed components—from radioactive gases, settled primarily along the atmospheric flow pathways

• Hot particles—fuel particles, uranium dioxide, with a specific activity >105 Bq/g, size 1 to 100 µm, surface density ~ 1,600 per m2, to ~0.5 m depth

Europe

Page 6: Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after

Uncertainties in Assessment and needs for experimental verification of the accidental consequences.

Radionuclide transport studies due to Runoff, sampling at the contaminated lands and water bodies

Page 7: Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after

Specific phenomenon of the Chernobyl radioactive release --- significant amount of nuclear fuel particles were dispersed to the

environment and deposited on catchment’s soils and bottom sediment of the affected water bodies

[O] = 25.8 0.5 %

[U] = 61.7 0.5 %[Zr] = 7.6 0.2 %[O] = 25.8 0.5 %

[U] = 61.7 0.5 %[Zr] = 7.6 0.2 %[O] = 25.8 0.5 %[O] = 25.8 0.5 %

[U] = 61.7 0.5 %[U] = 61.7 0.5 %[Zr] = 7.6 0.2 %[Zr] = 7.6 0.2 %

UOx matrix fuel particle

U-Zr-O matrix fuel particle

Median size of fuel particles ~ 4-6 mTill 2000 about 70% of radionuclide activity was associated with hot particles particles (2000)

In 2008 most of particles in the soils of river water catchments have been destroyed due to weathering impact and chemical leaching, while significant amount of the “hot particles” still remained in the bottom sediment of lakes around ChNPP. from Kashparov at al, 2003

Fuel particle X-ray microanalysis spectrum of Zr-U-O fuel particles

(Ahamdach 2000)

Page 8: Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after

Geochemical Conceptual Model of the fuel hot particles behavior in soils and bottom sediment

• Low DO and high pH cause a very slow dissolution of fuel particles in bottom sediments.

• Weathering effects, vegetation and microbiological are causing significant effects onto the hot particles physical structure In soils and dried wetlands increasing its dissolution rate.

• Fuel particle dissolution will take ~15–25 years in exposed sediments, and ~100 years in flooded areas

• The physical and chemical form of radionuclide transformation in the catchments' soils and bottom sediment allow to achieve significant progress developing radionuclide water transport models from the contaminated watersheds and river systems

J Environ Radioact. 2009 Apr;100(4):p.329-32..Fuel particles in the Chernobyl cooling pond:

current state and prediction for remediation options.

Bulgakov A, Konoplev A, Smith J, Laptev G, Voitsekhovich O.

0

2

4

6

8

0 5 10 15

Time, years

рН

0.00

0.10

0.20

kl,

yr-1

pHK d

0

25

50

75

100

0 20 40Time, years

90 S

r in

fu

el p

art

icle

s, %

exposed

flooded

Page 9: Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after

Calculated plume formation according to meteorological conditions for instantaneous releases on the following dates and times (GMT): (1) 26 April, 00:00; (2) 27 April, 00:00; (3) 27 April, 12:00; (4) 29 April, 00:00; (5) 2 May, 00:00; and (6) 4 May, 12:00

(Borsilov and Klepikova 1993). 0.00001

0.0001

0.001

0.01

0.1

0 5 10 15

Time since Chernobyl (yrs)

137C

s in

wat

er p

er B

q m

-2 o

f fa

llo

ut

(m-1

)

Kymijoki

Kokemaenjoki

Oulujoki

Kemijoki

Tornionjoki

Dora Baltea

Dnieper

Sozh

Iput

Besed

P ripyat (Mozyr)

Danube

P ripyat (Cher.)

Radioactive contamination of the catchments and aquatic

environment as versus of fallout formation date,

its physical and chemical forms and also the landscapes at the

deposited river watersheds

137Cs activity concentration in different rivers per unit of deposition, Smith, 2004

Page 10: Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after

Radionuclides in RiversAnnual fluxes of 137Cs in the Dnieper River

Ratio of 90Sr and 137Cs in soluble forms in Pripyat River near Chernobyl

1012 Bq Radionuclide inlet to the Kiev reservoir. Pripyat RiverDesna River

Data of Ukr. Hydromet. Institute

Rain flood

Winter ice jam

Spring flo

od

Spring flo

od

Page 11: Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

01.01 16.01 31.01 15.02 02.03 17.03 01.04 16.04 01.05 16.05 31.05 15.06 30.06

90 S

r C

on

ce

ntr

ati

on

, B

q m

-3/

Wa

ter

Dis

ch

arg

e,

m3 s-1

102

103

104

105

106

107

108

109

Sr-90, Chernobyl

Sr-90, Input Crossect

Flow Discharge

Water Level

UA Permisible Level

Wa

ter L

ev

el, m

BS

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

01.01 16.01 31.01 15.02 02.03 17.03 01.04 16.04 01.05 16.05 31.05 15.06 30.06

137 C

s C

on

ce

ntr

ati

on

, B

q m-3

/ W

ate

r D

isc

ha

rge

, m3 s

-1

102

103

104

105

106

107

108

109

Cs-137, InputCrossectCs-137, Chernobyl

Flow Discharge

Water Level

Wa

ter L

ev

el, m

BS

Pripyat River Flood 1999Pripyat River Flood 1999

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005Year

137Cs, ТBq

Inflow to ChEZOutflow from ChEZ

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005Year

90Sr, ТBq

Inflow to ChEZ

Outflow from ChEZ

Wash-out phenomenon for 137Cs and 90Sr

90Sr

90Cs

Radionuclides runoff budget in the Pripyat river show 10-20% of Cs and 40-70% of Sr have contributing by contaminated waters washed out from the ChNPP zone

Return water running off

from floodplain and drainages

Wash-off Snow melting effect

Page 12: Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after

19861986

19931993

Pripyat River Floodplain around Chernobyl NPP was most heavy contaminated Pripyat River Floodplain around Chernobyl NPP was most heavy contaminated and identified as most significant source of the Dnieper system and identified as most significant source of the Dnieper system 9090Sr-90 secondary Sr-90 secondary

contaminationcontamination

Flood protective dam has been constructed

19991999

Site characterization studies and modeling results show that most efficient water protection strategy will be to control water level and to mitigate inundation of the most contaminated floodplains by the flood protection sandy dykes constructed at left and right banks of the Pripyat river

Page 13: Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after

Annually averaged 90Sr activities in water of the Pripyat River downstream of Chernobyl town and effects of water contamination

reduction due to construction of the protective dams, preventing flooding of the most contaminated floodplain area near NPP riverside in 1993

Before protective dam constructed

After protective dam constructed in 1993

1986-2009

1987 1993

2009

Page 14: Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after

а

Data of Chernobyl Ecocenter

Radionuclides in water of the Chernobyl cooling pond, 1986-2009

Radionuclides in the closed lakes of the most contaminated areas around Chernobyl

137Cs and 90Sr in Gluboky lake near Chernobyl NPP

Page 15: Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after

TRWDS

Temporary Radioactive Waste Disposal Sites

are significant sources of the shallow ground water

contamination

Its characterization and step by step removal to the specially

organized places for long-term safe storage at the Radioactive

Waste Reprocessing Plant become significant element of

Environment Remediation Strategy at the Chernobyl

Exclusion zone reducing their influence on further long-term ground waters contaminationNNC,2001

Page 16: Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after

Chernobyl Pilot Site – “worst case” scenario of near-surface radioactive waste disposal

Schematic trench cross-sectionBugay at al, 2003.

Trench Studies TRWDS (PVLRO “ Red Forest)

Page 17: Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after

In some places 90Sr activities concentrations in the ground waters adjacent to TRWDS are continuing to growth.

Those, its moving toward the Pripyat river are very slow (1-10 m per year).

90Sr will reach the Pripyat River in ~50-60 yr from now,

However, even in case contaminated groundwater front will reach the river its flux contribution will be insignificant to the Pripyat River radioactive contamination at this time.

In any case observations on the groundwater regime and its contamination trends will be continued for a long time Bugai et al. 1996

90Sr in the groundwater TRWDS “Sand Plato” near Pripyat River (Kiereev et al. 2006)

Monitoring and Simulation of 90Sr Distribution in Groundwater

Page 18: Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after

Effects of the Groundwater level drawdown

The groundwater water table will be reduced at mane places around the ChNPP Cooling pond from 1 to 7 m

of present since it will be decommissioning

The ground water flow directions will be also changed.

The effects of the groundwater level declining in the CP will create positive effects in regarding of the number of temporary waste disposal sites situated

around and also is beneficial for lowering inundation levels at Chernobyl NPP NSC (New Safe Confinement)

site Bugai D., Skalsky A. 2001

8 0 0 9 0 0 1 0 0 0 11 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 4 0 0 1 5 0 0 1 6 0 0 1 7 0 0

8 0 0 9 0 0 1 0 0 0 11 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 4 0 0 1 5 0 0 1 6 0 0 1 7 0 0

8 0

9 0

1 0 0

11 0

8 0

9 0

1 0 0

11 0

1 .0 E + 0 0 2

1 .0 E + 0 0 3

1 .0 E + 0 0 4

1 .0 E + 0 0 5

1 .0 E + 0 0 6

1 .0 E + 0 0 7

1 .0 E + 0 0 8

1 .0 E + 0 0 9

4 .0 E + 0 0 9

B q /m ^ 3ChNPP NSC

Predicted 90Sr concentrations in the aqueous phase without NSC after 100 yr.

Distance toward the Pripyat River from NSC

Page 19: Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after

90Sr

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Years

Bq/m3

Vishgorod Novaya Kahovka

90Sr in the waters of the Dnieper’s reservoirs90Sr in the reservoirs of the Dnieper

cascade is still above of its pre-accidental levels observed in 2010 in

range 40-100 Bq m-3 ( the same levels as were observed during 2002

Page 20: Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after

137Сs

1

10

100

1000

1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 Years

Bq/m3

Vishgorod Novaya Kahovka

137Cs in the waters of the Dnieper reservoirs

137Cs activity concentration in water at the lowest reservoir returned to its pre-

accidental level still in 1996-1998.

In 2010 137Cs activities in Kiev (upper reservoir) in a cascade were observing

in range 10-20 Bq m3, while in Kakhovka (lower reservoir) -- 0,5-1,0 Bq m3

Page 21: Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after

137Cs in the bottom sediments of Reservoirs

1991-93

Upper part of Kiev Reservoir

Low part of Kiev Reservoir

2009

137Cs1994

Dni

eper

Pripyat River

Dam near Kiev

Kremetchug reservoir bottom, 1994

Page 22: Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after

137Cs in freshwater fish and other aquatic biota

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

Bq/

kg,

w.w

.

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

Bq/

kg, w

.w

137Cs in predatory and non predatory fish species in Kiev reservoir. (after I.Ryabov et al., 2001)

137Cs and 90Sr in predatory and non-predatory fish species. Gluboky Lake

Gudkov, et al. 2008)

Page 23: Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after

Absorbed dose rate caused by incorporated radionuclides in the algae and non-predatory fishes.

Gluboky Lake

Averaged chromosome aberration rates in the fresh water lake mussels in the lakes of the ChNNP area and in the reference clean lakes near Kiev

Published by D.Gudkov et al. 2008

Page 24: Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after

Summary. Long-term doses from aquatic pathways.

Human exposure via the aquatic pathway took place as a result of consumption of drinking water, fish catch in reservoirs and agricultural products grown using irrigation water from Dnieper reservoirs.

In the middle and lower areas adjacent to the Dnieper reservoirs, which were not significantly subjected to direct radionuclide contamination in 1986, a significant proportion (10–20%) of the Chernobyl exposures were attributed to aquatic pathways.

Estimates were that individual doses via aquatic pathways would not have exceeded 1–5 μSv y-1.

Furthermore, in some closed lakes, the concentration of 137Cs remains high and high levels of contamination are found in fish species. People who illegally catch and eat contaminated fish may receive internal doses in excess of 0,5-1 mSv per year from this source.

The most significant individual dose was from 131I and was estimated to be up to 0.5–1.0 mSv for the citizens of Kyiv during the first few weeks after the Chernobyl accident.

Page 25: Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after

Aquatic pathway of Radiation Risk forming and its

Public perception

• In spite of doses were estimated to be very low, there was an inadequate understanding of the real risks of using water from contaminated aquatic systems.

• This created an (unexpected) stress in the population concerning the safety of the water system. This factor made reasonable to provide assessment of collective commitment doses as a basis for justification of some water protection actions

Food product, milk water external inhalation

Actual dose

Public perception about

Dose realization (%) during a 70 years for children born in 1986

From I.Los, O.Voitsekhovych, 2001

For 1-st year about 47 %

For 10 years about 80%

Years

Page 26: Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after

Long-term probabilistic assessment of the Dnieper River contamination -- as a basis for collective dose simulation

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

19941996199920012004200620092011201420162019202120242026202920312034203620392041204420462049205120542056

Year

pC

i/l

Kiev res.

Kakhovka res.Sr- 90

02

46

810

1214

1618

19941996199820002002200420062008201020122014201620182020202220242026202820302032203420362038204020422044204620482050205220542056

Year

pC

i/l

Kiev res.

Kakhovka res.Sr-90

Concentration of 90Sr (1 pCi = 3,7 *10-2 Bq) in water of the upper and downstream reservoirs for the worst (top) and best probabilistic hydrological scenarios to be possible expected at the Dnieper reservoirs (Zheleznyak et al., 1997).

Estimates were made of the collective dose to people from these three pathways for a period of 70 years after the accident, i.e. from 1986 to 2056

A long-term hydrological scenario was analysed using a computer model (Zheleznyak et al 1992).

Historical data were used to account for the natural variability in river flow.

Dose-assessment studies were carried out to estimate the collective dose from the three main pathways (Berkovski et al 1996),.

Page 27: Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1 6 11

16

21

26

31

36

41

46

51

56

61

66

Com

pone

nts

of c

olle

ctiv

e do

se, %

0

10

20

30

40

50

Ann

ual c

olle

ctiv

e do

se,

man

Sv

Орошение Рыба Питьевая вода Годовая коллективная дозаIrrigation Fish Drinking water Annual collective dose

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1 6 11

16

21

26

31

36

41

46

51

56

61

66

Co

mp

on

ents

of

coll

ecti

ve

do

se,

%

0

10

20

30

40

50

An

nu

al

coll

ecti

ve

do

se,

ma

n S

v

Орошение Рыба Питьевая вода Годовая коллективная дозаIrrigation Fish Drinking water Annual collective dose

Collective effective dose for Kyiv region population due to water consumption from Kiev reservoir usage pathways as a function of years after 1986

Collective effective dose for Poltava region population due to water usage pathways from Kremetchug reservoir as a function of years after 1986

Page 28: Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after

COLLECTIVE DOSE COMMITMENT (CDC70) CAUSED BY 90SR AND 137CS FLOWING FROM THE PRIPYAT RIVER (BERKOVSKY ET AL. 1996)

Dose estimates for the Dnieper system show that if there had been no action to reduce radionuclide fluxes to the river, the collective dose commitment for the population of Ukraine (mainly due to Cs and Sr) could have reached 3000 man Sv.

Protective measures, which were carried out during 1992–1993 on the left-bank flood plain of the Pripyat River and later on right bank (1999) decreased exposure by approximately 1000 man Sv. (Voitsekhovich et al. 1996).

Page 29: Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after

Water protection and Remediation • Many remediation measures during initial period after the accident (1986-1988)

were put in place, but because actions were not taken on the basis of dose reduction, most of these measures were ineffective.

• Because of the importance of short lived radionuclides, early intervention measures, particularly changing supplies, can significantly reduce doses to the population, mainly because 131I. However this opportunity has been missed during first month since the accident.

• During first months after the accident restrictions on fishery and irrigation from the contaminated water bodies have been established. The number of water regulation actions at the small river in the Chernobyl exclusion zone were applied.

• Numerous countermeasures put in place in the months and years after the accident to protect water systems from transfers of radioactivity from contaminated soils were, in general, ineffective and expensive and led to relatively high exposures to workers implementing the countermeasures.

• The water regulation at the most contaminated floodplains and water runoff regulation from the wetlands in the close zone around ChNPP only can be considering as effective.

Page 30: Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after

Decommissioning means:

Restore Monitoring network

Stop water pumping from the river

• Separating the inflow and outflow channels (to use as fire reservoir)

• Construct alternative source of cooling water--groundwater pumping wells

• Declining water from the CP (filtration)

• Remediation of the remained bottom area if needed. Institutional control.

ChNPP

Prip

yat River

Decommissioning of the Chernobyl Cooling Pond

PripyatRiver

Monitoring well

Quaternary unconfinedaquifer

Eocene aquitard

Eocene confined aquifer

Subsurfacedischarge

Cooling pond

Drainagedischarge

North drainagechannelSouth drainage

channel

104

105

106

107

108

109

110

111

0 365 730 1095 1460 1825 2190 2555 2920 3285

Время, сутки

Ур

ов

ен

ь в

од

ы в

ВО

, м Б

СВ Сухий сценарій

Нормальнийсценарій

Water level above the sea

Days after start point

Page 31: Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after

As the result of the water level decline the area covered

about 60-70% of the bottom sediment territory may be

dried and exposed for wind human access.

The new artificially forming bottom sediment relief will be

created by the 3 types - always dry

- always covered by water - intermediate wetland (dried

or wet) depend of water mode and climate conditions)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

0 50 100 150 200 250 300

Время, годы

90S

r, Б

к/л

Bottom Sediment landscape

transformationThe geochemistry of the wetland lakes will be transformed.

рН will be reduced and NH4 will be increased

The radionuclides in the water column will be increased

Page 32: Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after

53

105

340

780

720

9467

43

44

35

7

31

31

571

48

50

150

56

139

990

30

53

2700

48

30

76

210

55

188

52

143

205

63

70

33

280

57

200

51

51200

54

66

45

100

64

30

30

57

75

35

33

180

39

30

65

33

55

250

71

252

42

40

33

55

40

6

174

108

157

55

45

170

42

94

18

40

73

61

41

40

24

210

40

76

72

50

27

29

42

104

71 90

133

97

79

311

45

145

100

56

262

50

75

64

52

300

158

75

302

57

86

27

67

15

100

140

350

350

760

57

380

1327

152

3360

90

551

100

5000

453

256

809

400

200

1780

928

50

51

320

682

1195

75

234

50

600

481

230

200

2000

75

3600

800

200

80

1200

1900

231

1200

2300

2350

200

2101

2150

780

1400

4780

800

1984

2720

615

1706

991

200

1376

230

25

50

75

100

150

250

500

750

1200

2000

Chernobyl NPP Cooling PondCs-137, Ci km -2

Scale 1cm :500m

0 500 1000 1500 2000

Ci km -2

87

243

28

44

19

22

5

3

3514

4

9

16

4

13

7

5

16

23

17

35

38

103

30

7

515

4

2

17

200 260

455

940

302

480

5

147

3

40

10

220

254

100

340

330

72

137

20

147

980

1

5

10

25

50

100

250

500

750

1000

Chernobyl NPP Cooling PondSr-90, Ci km2

Scale 1cm:500m

0 500 1000 1500 2000

Ci km-2

0.67

2.6

0.35

0.52

0.18

0.15

0.041

0.04

0.30.097

0.024

0.09

0.12

0.028

0.12

0.06

0.06

0.12

0.28

0.18

0.35

0.51

0.050.011

0.84

0.071

4.7

8

16

3.5

6

0.1

3.5

0.074

0.97

0.42

6.3

5.8

2.4

11

11

0.01

0.05

0.1

1

5

10

Chernobyl NPP Cooling PondTotal Pu, Ci km 2

Scale 1cm :500m

0 500 1000 1500 2000

Ci km -2

137Cs 90Sr 239,240Pu

137Сs 90Sr 239,240Pu

According to UHMI report in the CP is currently accumulated about

280 TБк 137Cs, 42 TБк 90Sr and 0,75 TБк Pu

The major activities of these radionuclides accumulated at the depth deeper of 7 meters and will remain flooded in a new transformed water ecosystem

Radionuclides in the bottom sediment (UHMI, 2005)

Page 33: Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after

Possible effects of soil particles atmospheric dispersion and fire

• The effects of re-suspension to be local and may increase contamination of the surrounding areas no more then 5 % of existing contamination level.

• NO significant effects for personnel, working at the Chernobyl NPP site due to effect of wind re-suspension or grass fire at the CP (less 1 mSv a year)

Page 34: Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after

Conclusions• Radiological Risks associated with decommissioning of ChNPP for

population living along the Dnieper River is negligible.

• Transition period of the water infiltration may take 5-7 years, since the current CP will be transformed in to the new ecosystem

Preliminary assessment show that combination of OPTIONS

• Do nothing and “Partial Remediation”, i.e. remediation of the most contaminated sediments ( relatively small areas 0,1-0,5 km2 by removing them and placing in the waste disposal site can be reasonable .

• Natural attenuation process such as natural vegetation covers of the exposed sediment to be most reasonable selected remediation strategy.

• New transformed ChNPP cooling pond ecosystem will pose a unique natural ecosystem laboratory.

• It is still uncertain understanding how fast new transformed ecosystem will be restored as wetlands with a new sustainable conditions

Page 35: Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after

From Chernobyl Forum, 2005 to 2011

What has been changed ?

International Conference 25 Years after Chernobyl, Kiev

Page 36: Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after

Radionuclides in the Black Sea• After Chernobyl 137Cs inventory in

the 0-50 m layer increased by a factor of 6-10 and the total 137Cs inventory in the whole basin increased by a factor of at least 2 ( pre-Chernobyl value of 1.40.3 PBq)

• 137Cs input from the Danube and the Dnieper rivers (0.05 PBq in the period 1986-2000) was insignificant in comparison with the short-term atmospheric fallout.

• • The contribution of Chernobyl-

origin 137Sr from atmospheric fallout was estimated at 0.1-0.3 PBq.

• At the same time, a relatively important input of 90Sr from the Dnieper and Danube Rivers was observed.

Page 37: Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after

Sediments/Water FluxesSediments/Water Fluxes Sediments/Water FluxesSediments/Water Fluxes

137s

137Cs and 90Sr vertical distributions in the Western Black Sea deep-water basin (1998 and 2000)

0 10 20 30

0

50

100

150

200

0 200 400 600 800 1000

C(z)=C0+a/(1+exp(-(z-z0)/b))

R = 0.91 St. Error = 2.61

Depth

, m

TOTAL INVENTORY

(0-200m layer) -1173+/-181 TBq

137Cs, Bq m-3

137Cs, TBq

- BS98-16- BS2K-37

Stations:

90Sr, Bq m-3

0 5 10 15 20 25

Dep

th, m

0

50

100

150

200

250

500

750

1000

1250

1500

1750

2000

90Sr, TBq0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

C(z)=C0+a/(1+exp(-(z-z0)/b))

R = 0.93 St. Error = 1.42

- BS2K - 37- BS2K - 23- BS2K - 11- BS98 - 16- BS98 - 15

TOTAL INVENTORY

in the whole volume -1765+/-792 TBq

Stations:

Page 38: Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after

0 250 500 750 1000

137Cs activity, Bq.kg-1 dw

Dep

th, c

m

1

2

3

7

8

4

5

6

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8

238Pu/239,240Pu

Dep

th, c

m

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Fuel

rep

roce

ssin

g

Wea

pons

test

ing

Che

rnob

yl

8

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

137Cs, Bq kg-1

Depth

, cm

137Cs in core BS98-03 illustrate a history of sedimentation

typical of riverine suspended particles deposited near the

Danube River Delta

137Cs activity and 238Pu/ 239,240Pu activity ratio profiles in deep-sea sediment core BS2K-11

(water depth 1880 m), 2002

Vertical profile of Radiotracers

Page 39: Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after

Resolution of the core Resolution of the core cutting method is 5-7 cutting method is 5-7 slices for slices for 1 cm of the 1 cm of the

bottom sediment core bottom sediment core

0 500 1000 1500 2000

0-0.15

0.30-0.50

0.70-0.90

1.00-1.20

1.40-1.60

1.80-2.00

2.25-2.50

2.75-3.00

137Cs activity, Bq/kg

Slic

e, c

mThe result illustrates the low sedimentation rates, the upper peak of The result illustrates the low sedimentation rates, the upper peak of

137137Cs corresponding to the Chernobyl input (1986) and the lower one to Cs corresponding to the Chernobyl input (1986) and the lower one to the time of maximum input from global fallout in the early 1960s. the time of maximum input from global fallout in the early 1960s.

The result illustrates the low sedimentation rates, the upper peak of The result illustrates the low sedimentation rates, the upper peak of 137137Cs corresponding to the Chernobyl input (1986) and the lower one to Cs corresponding to the Chernobyl input (1986) and the lower one to

the time of maximum input from global fallout in the early 1960s. the time of maximum input from global fallout in the early 1960s.

BLACK SEA CORE BS-4Depth versus Age

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

70 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220

Age (y)

Dep

th (

cm)

0.000

0.005

0.010

0.015

0.020

0.025

0.030

Sed

imen

tati

on

Rat

e (g

cm

2 y-1

)

CRS Pb-210 Dates

CIC Pb-210 Dates

Cs-137/Am-241 Dates

CRS SedimentationRates

1986

1963

ChNPP

NW Tests

Black Sea Cruise 1998

1963 (66)

1986 (89)

Page 40: Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after

Environment Radiation Monitoring Findings ERM should be a tool for decision making

ERM should be Task and Site specific

Sampling programs to be based on screening assessment and also have adequately designed according to the tasks, expected way of the data utilization and regulatory requirements

Parameters for analytical measurements have to be corresponded with source term analyses and strategies for Safety or Environment Assessment .

QA/QC principles to be obligatory for all partners of the ERM programs

Data reporting and Data management should be well coordinated, agreed and based on DPSIR principles

DPSIR = Drivers, Pressures, States, Impacts and Responses

Page 41: Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after

09.09.2009

Network of Monitoring Stations and Wells in the ChNPP close-in zone.

Schematic of Monitoring Wells

нниийй””

• 40 cross sections and aerosol pump stations;• 138 wells, 2 water supply stations;• 4 stations of surface water and bottom sediments

Chernobyl Ecocenter, S. Kireev.

Page 42: Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after

Groundwater Modeling

• VisualModflow and MT3D96 codes

• Regional model of the Chernobyl exclusion zone and a 2D cross-section model

Pond

Infiltration model After Bugai et al.

Page 43: Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after

Surface Water ModelingWater Quality Analysis Simulation Program (WASP)--EPA framework for modeling contaminant fate and transport in surface water.

Radionuclide transport modeling codes RIVTOX, COASTOX and THREETOX developed in IMMSP of the National Academy of Sciences

of Ukraine

Kd depends on the N ammonia concentration (M. Zheleznyak et al., (2005)—INTAS-2001-0556 Project Report “Radionuclide and Sediment Transport Modelling

Within the Cooling Pond Ecosystem“) Zheleznyak et al., 2002; Maderich et al, 2005

Page 44: Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after

Microbial communities

Dissolved radionuclides

Radionuclides in suspended sediments

Radionuclides in bottom sediments

Advection

Diffusion/Dispersion

Adsorption Desorption

Adsorption

Desorption

Sedimentation

Resuspension

Uptake

Processes Affecting Radionuclide Transport in the lake-reservoir systems

Suspended sediments

Do We Have Reliable Monitoring and Modeling Tools?

Modified after M.Zheleznyak

Page 45: Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after

FloodplainChernobyl

NPP

Cooling pond

Modeling of Cooling pond Dam Break and Sr-90 release

00,050,1

0,150,2

0,250,3

0,350,4

0,450,5

1 19

37

55

73

91

10

9

12

7

14

5

16

3

18

1

19

9

21

7

23

5

25

3

27

1

28

9

30

7

32

5

34

3

36

1

time (day)

Sr

90 c

on

c. in

solu

t. (

Bq

/l)

Kiev

Kanev

Krem

Dndz

Dnepr

Kahovka

M. Zheleznyak et al. 2005

Page 46: Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after

Some conclusive comments

Basic knowledge of geological, hydrological and ecosystem peculiarities at the area of potential radiation impact allows to select right strategy on imitative and environment protection

Any countermeasure and remediation planning must be based on detailed monitoring data and exhausting site characterization results.

Scientifically defensive assessment tools and required data must be developed and applied

Countermeasure and remediation selection must be based on a cost-risk analyses that directly connects the main physical and chemical processes to environment (ecosystem) or human heath risks and costs

Decision makers must be knowledgeable on phenomena being evaluating, they should efficient use expert’s experience and expert’s analytical and modeling systems, which can help to accept right and reasonable decisions aiming to mitigate or prevent expose of people and also allow to safe as always limited resources available , when measures can not be justified or may be postponed.

Decision makers must communicate facts quickly and honestly to the affected public

Page 47: Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after

Acknowledgements

This this comprehensive overview is based on the results taken from number of previous national and international projects, which have been implementing with contribution of many people during recent 25 years.

Special thanks to:.G. Laptev, V.Kanivets, A. Kostezh, L.Pirnach, S.Todosienko (UHMI)

• and also appreciate to our colleagues:• D.Bugay, A.Skalsky (Institute Geological Sciences) • S. Kireev ( Chernobyl Centre), • V. Kashparov (Institute agriculture radioecology)• Konoplev, A. Bulgakov, (SPA, “Typoon”)• M.Zheleznyak, (IPMMS)• V.Berkovsky ( IRP)• O.Nasvit and D.Gudkov (IGB)

Many thanks to all analyst, engineers and technicians, which contribution to field and analytical studies make possible this syntheses and analyses

Many thanks to Chernobyl NPP authority and Administration of the Chernobyl Exclusion zone for supporting remediation projects and monitoring programs at the Chernobyl exclusion zone

Page 48: Head of Environment Radiation Monitoring Department. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute. Kiev Ukraine Radioecological research during 25 years after

Thank you very much for your attention

UHMI, Nauki prospect, 37. Kiev 03028. Ukraine

[email protected]