he in fe insight into the applicant experience as supplier, demander, partner and competitor...
TRANSCRIPT
HE in FE insight into the Applicant Experienceas supplier, demander, partner and competitor
Professionalising Admission to Higher Education in Further Education Conference – 2 March 2010
Dan Shaffer, Senior Project Officer
Defining your Applicant Experience Strategy
Prompted by Student Experience research
Looked at USA models of Strategic Enrolment Management
Accepted marketing and market forces play a determining role
Adopted a behavioural view of ‘experience’ Interactive participation and engagement, not a passive journey
“Encompasses all the opportunities or points of interaction between higher education and a potential student. Such experience affects whether or not an individual becomes a higher education student, and indeed whether or not an individual chooses to apply to higher education in the first place. “
Defining your Applicant Experience Strategy
Pre-applicationenquirerspotential applicants
Applicationstudy choices
Post-applicationselection; offersaccepted applicants unsuccessful applicants
Transitionconfirmationinduction
enrolment
Retention and graduation
?
Student Services
Teaching & Learning
Admissions
Schools’ Liaison
WP/Outreach
Marketing
AC
AD
EMIC
PR
OV
ISIO
N
Defining your Applicant Experience Strategy
A good applicant experience is mutually beneficial to both the
applicant and the higher education provider
prepares, informs and provides equality of opportunity to enter higher education
should accurately match the student’s aims, abilities and aspirations with the character of the institution.
therefore improves student retention and enhances the strategic mission of the institution
A poor applicant experience is inherently detrimental to both the
applicant and the higher education provider – both lose out
perpetuates barriers to entry disengages potential applicants and
their advisors risks incongruence between student
expectations and institutional character therefore embeds an enrolment strategy
leading to unfulfilled potential and increased drop-out
HE in FE as supplier, demander, partner and competitor
FE colleges with HE provision may have a unique and largely unexplored view on the applicant experience as:
Suppliers of potential HE applicants at the top of the funnel
Demanders of HE students at the other end
In partnership with other providers to deliver quality higher education
In competition with those same providers for able and suitable students
HE in FE as supplier, demander, partner and competitor
Does this create a better relationship between applicant and institution?
Does this lead to a more focused relationship with partner institutions?
If not, how does the experience falter and
what needs to be embedded to improve it?
Just to test …
Do you like Marmite?
Yes No
Just to test …If elections were decided by the party leaders boxing each other, who would win the next election?
1) Gordon Brown
2) David Cameron
3) Nick Clegg
Just to test …Assuming there is reincarnation and you are given the choice of coming back as one of three animals, please rank the choices in your order of preference:
1) seagull
2) lion
3) dolphin
Question OneWho makes the offers on your UCAS applications?
1) Your own college
2) Your partner university
3) Your college makes the decisions, but the university inputs it to UCAS
4) It varies, depending on the course
5) Don’t know
Question TwoOn a scale of 1-5, how well informed do you feel your FE students are about the UCAS process?
1) not at all
2) slightly
3) moderately
4) quite well
5) very well
Question ThreeOn a scale of 1-5, how well informed do you feel your FE students should be about the UCAS process?
1) not at all
2) slightly
3) moderately
4) quite well
5) very well
Question FourOn a scale of 1-5, how well informed do you feel your FE students are about other HE admissions routes (e.g. part-time)?
1) not at all
2) slightly
3) moderately
4) quite well
5) very well
Question FiveOn a scale of 1-5, how well informed do you feel your FE students should be about other HE admissions routes (e.g. part-time)?
1) not at all
2) slightly
3) moderately
4) quite well
5) very well
Question SixWhat is your opinion of the information from your partner universities?
1) Good for all HE admissions routes
2) Good for UCAS courses, but less so for other routes
3) Reasonable for general information, but could be more appropriate for FE applicants
4) Poor for all HE admissions routes
5) Don’t know
Question SevenOn average, do you think your FE students are less informed about admissions to HE than level three students in schools?
Yes No
Question EightHas any agreement for progression of your students to a partner university changed due to recent increased competition for places?
1) No change
2) There’s no longer a guarantee of an offer
3) Our students now need to apply earlier than before
4) The requirements have gone up
5) Our students need to apply earlier and the requirements have gone up
6) Don’t know
Question NineDo you feel your partner university consults with you appropriately on changes to progression agreements, allocation of funded places, tuition fees or other recruitment issues in college courses validated by them?
Yes No
Question TenDo you feel you keep your partner university well informed?
Yes No
Question ElevenPlease rank the choices to represent your order of priority for communication between partners
(1= most important; 5 = least important)
1) Clear and accessible course information / Entry Profiles
2) HEFCE HE Strategy
3) IQER
4) Progression agreements
5) Social Mobility
Question TwelveIf a university is looking at integrating the work of its staff as part of an applicant experience strategy, should this include relevant staff in partner colleges?
1) Yes, colleges are definitely part of that experience
2) No, colleges should remain outside of any university strategy and concentrate on their own, separate approaches
3) Colleges should be recognised and consulted on such a strategy, but co-ordination should be informal
4) Don’t know
