HB5 – Community and Student Engagement

Accountability System

Key CommunicatorsApril 24, 2014

HB 5 – Sec. 39.0545

Each school district shall evaluate the district's performance and the performance of each campus and assign the district and each campus a performance rating of exemplary, recognized, acceptable, or unacceptable for both overall performance and each individual evaluation factor.

Nine Factors:

1. Fine Arts2. Wellness and P.E.3. Community and Parental

Involvement4. 21st Century Workforce

Development Program5. Second Language Acquisition

Program6. Digital Learning Environment7. Dropout Prevention

Strategies8. Educational Programs for

Gifted and Talented Students9. Record of District and

Campus Compliance with Statutory Reporting and Policy Requirements

CSEAS – Working Committees

CSEAS Factors Central Staff Principals

Fine Arts Kathy Kuddes (Chair) – Fine Arts Janice Truit – Visual Arts Jeff Turner – Instrumental Music Greg Arp – Theatre Arts/SpeechSusan Hayes – Special Assignments

Billie-Jean Lee – Robinson George King – Plano East Jill Stoker – MathewsCindy Savant – Rose HaggarSandy Muzquiz – Meadows

Wellness and P.E.

Melinda Smith (Chair) – P.E./Health Mary Swinton – Elementary Science

Brant Perry – MurphyKary Cooper – JasperKatie Babb – AldridgeLynn Swanson – Thomas Renee Rucker – Mitchell

CSEAS – Working Committees

CSEAS Factors Central Staff Principals

Community and Parental Involvement

Mary Gorden (Chair) – CommunicationsGail Lundberg – Special EducationJoanna Chandler – Federal Programs Robin Garcia – Campus Support Lynda Shuttlesworth – Family Education and Guidance Services Kay Glawe – Family and Social ServicesRhonda Snyder, Plano ISD Council of PTAs

Shurandia Holden – Frankford Kathy King – Plano WestMariea Sprott – HightowerJane Oestreich – HickeyMichele Loper – Barron

21st Century Workforce Development Program

David Hitt (Chair) – Career and Technology EducationPaul Weaver – Guidance and Family Education Services

Lisa Long – HendrickLynn Ojeda – WilliamsSaul Laredo – DooleySarika Pride – MemorialKellie Latimer – Saigling

CSEAS – Working Committees

CSEAS Factors Central Staff Principals

Second Language Acquisition Program

Greta Lundgaard (Chair) – Languages Other than EnglishEmelia Ahmed – Multilingual

Lisa Long – Hendrick Lynn Ojeda – WilliamsSaul Laredo – Dooley Sarika Pride – Memorial Kellie Latimer – Saigling

Digital Learning Environment

Harriet Bell (Chair) – Instructional Tech Lisa Wellborn – Elem. Social Studies Lisa Farrell – Early Childhood Jean Parmer – eSchool

Chris Glasscock – Rice Renee Godi – Academy HighKristi Graham – Hedgecoxe Cindy Guinn – Daffron Toni Strickland – Huffman

Dropout Prevention Strategies

Gary Wilson (Chair) – Section 504 Kim Edmonds – ESL Laura Childress – Bird Education Center Sharon Bradley – Special Programs, Mike Landingham – Student Services

Steve Ewing – Armstrong Sarah Watkins – Plano SeniorBen Benavides – Weatherford Jeanne Beall – Schell

CSEAS – Working Committees

CSEAS Factors Central Staff Principals

Educational Programs for Gifted and Talented Students

Theresa Biggs (Chair) – Gifted Education

Jason Myatt – Schimelpfenig Janis Williams – Clark Barbara Lange – Brinker Linda Patrick – CarlisleTramy Tran – Forman

Compliance with Statutory Reporting and Policy Requirements

Joana Sorrels (Chair) – AccountabilityEmelia Ahmed – Multilingual Gail Lundberg – Special EducationMark Allen – Student & Family Services Kathy Dry – Student Records/PEIMS

Antoine Spencer – Otto Ann Irvine – Harrington

Project Manager

Dr. Paul Dabbs – Assessment & Accountability

Key Milestones

September 23 CSEAS Launch Meeting

by October 4 Committee Literature Review

October 8 Central Staff Meeting: review drafts

by November 21 Central Staff/Principals: draft diagnostics

November 25 Proposal to District Committee

December 4 Review diagnostics with all principals and assistant principals

January 8 Final review by all principals

January 14 Presentation to Board

February 17 Campus level documents available

April 9 Presentation and review of documents and procedures with all principals and assistant principals

May 23 Campus evaluations completed, results posted to web-based system

June 27 District-level evaluation complete

August 8 District and campus ratings submitted to TEA

Programs for Gifted and Talented Students:

1 3 5Teachers serving gifted/talented students have not had the 30 hour state mandated gifted training.

Teachers serving gifted/talented students have received the 30 hour state mandated gifted trainings and the 6 update hours.

Administrators and counselors have received the minimum initial 6 hour gifted training.

Teachers serving gifted/talented students have received the 30 hour state mandated gifted trainings and the 6 update hours.

Administrators and counselors have received the minimum 6 hour gifted training and most of the administrators and counselors have received an annual 6 hour update.

Professional Development

Diagnostic Indicators for Evaluation

CSEAS Factors Elementary Middle HS SHS

Fine Arts 8 21 22 25Wellness and P.E. 13 13 13 13Community and Parental Involvement 16 16 16 16

21st Century Workforce Development Program 5 4 6 7

Second Language Acquisition Program 4 9 8 11

Digital Learning Environment 7 7 7 7

Dropout Prevention Strategies 15 15 15 15

Educational Programs for Gifted and Talented Students 6 6 5 5

Record of District and Campus Compliance with Statutory Reporting and Policy Requirements

13 13 13 13

Summarizing Diagnostic Indicators for a Rating

Performance Rating Rating System(with 10 diagnostics)

Exemplary9/10 Indicators 3 or Higher

+At Least 1 Indicator Above 3

Recognized8/10 Indicators 3 or Higher

+At Least 1 Indicator Above 3

Acceptable 7/10 Indicators 3 or Higher

Unacceptable 4/10 or More Indicators Below 3

Example of Summary ReportCSEAS Factors Rating

Fine Arts ExemplaryWellness and P.E. RecognizedCommunity and Parental Involvement Acceptable

21st Century Workforce Development ProgramExemplary

Second Language Acquisition ProgramRecognized

Digital Learning Environment ExemplaryDropout Prevention Strategies

Recognized

Educational Programs for Gifted and Talented Exemplary

Compliance with Statutory Reporting and PolicyRecognized

Overall Campus Evaluation Rating _____________

Overall Campus Evaluation Rating

CampusEvaluation Rating From Factor Ratings

Exemplary All Factors are Acceptable/Met or Higher + 3/8 Factors Exemplary

Recognized All Factors are Acceptable/Met or Higher + 3/8 Factors Recognized or Higher

Acceptable 8/9 Factors are Acceptable/Met or Higher

Unacceptable Two or More Factors Not Acceptable/Not Met

DISTRICT LEVELEvaluation of Community and Student Engagement Accountability System

District Level CSEAS Process

• Goal is to evaluate how well the district designs, supports, and continues improvements to programs that enable campuses to perform satisfactorily in all the program areas

• The key practices evaluated are:– Leadership and Capacity Building– Monitoring Performance and Progress– Intervention and Adjustment

Programs for Gifted and Talented Students:

1 3 5District leaders do not establish a process to evaluate programs or strategies based on evidence of effectiveness and efficient use of resources.

District leaders establish a process to evaluate programs or strategies based on limited evidence of effectiveness and efficient use of resources.

District leaders establish a process to evaluate programs or strategies based on clear evidence of effectiveness and efficient use of resources.

Professional Development

CSEAS – Schedule– Campuses can begin using the diagnostic system to

evaluate starting February 17• As most diagnostic indicators are on programs,

implementation, and participation of students, this information is already available for evaluation

– Campuses will complete the diagnostics in June– District diagnostic will be in June and will review

campus diagnostic information as input– August 8 – Report data to TEA

CSEAS – Schedule– Campuses can begin using the diagnostic system to

evaluate starting February 17• As most diagnostic indicators are on programs,

implementation, and participation of students, this information is already available for evaluation

– Campuses will complete the diagnostics in June– District diagnostic will be in June and will review

campus diagnostic information as input– August 8 – Report data to TEA

HB5 – Community and Student Engagement

Accountability System

Key CommunicatorsApril 24, 2014