group technology

58
Advanced Manufacturing Systems Advanced Manufacturing Systems Design Design © 2000 © 2000 John W. Nazemetz John W. Nazemetz Lecture 5 Topic : Lecture 5 Topic : Group Technology Group Technology Segment A Topic: Segment A Topic: Definition and Concepts Definition and Concepts

Upload: rammit2007

Post on 05-Dec-2015

11 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

cim

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Group Technology

Advanced Manufacturing Advanced Manufacturing Systems DesignSystems Design

© 2000 © 2000 John W. NazemetzJohn W. Nazemetz

Lecture 5 Topic :Lecture 5 Topic : Group Technology Group Technology

Segment A Topic:Segment A Topic: Definition and Definition and ConceptsConcepts

Page 2: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 2Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

ADVANCED ADVANCED MANUFACTURING MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS DESIGNSYSTEMS DESIGN

Group Technology Group Technology

Definition and ConceptsDefinition and Concepts

Page 3: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 3Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

OverviewOverview

• Group TechnologyGroup Technology

– Definitions

– Concepts

Page 4: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 4Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

Group Technology – Group Technology – Definition (1)Definition (1)

• DefinitionDefinition– Group Technology is an operating

management philosophy based on the recognition that similarities occur in the design and manufacture of discrete parts.

– Group Technology exploits the similarities among attributes of objects for the purpose of performing a known function. The attributes may be physical or process oriented.

Page 5: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 5Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

Group Technology – Group Technology – Definition (2)Definition (2)

• Alternate Definition (Webster)Alternate Definition (Webster)– Group

• To Combine in a Group, to Assign to a Group, Synonymous with Classify

– Technology• An Applied Science, A Technical Method to

Achieve a Practical Purpose.

– GT => A Technical Method of Group Formation

Page 6: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 6Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

Group Technology -Group Technology -ApplicationsApplications

• ApplicationsApplications– Design

• Similar Shapes• Similar Processing

– Group Scheduling• Sequence Dependant Set Ups

– Cellular Manufacturing (Decomposition of Manufacturing Problem)• Logical Cells• Physical Cells

Page 7: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 7Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

Group Technology-Group Technology-BenefitsBenefits

• DesignDesign– Part Standardization

• Reduces Inventories• Reduces Managerial

Complexity

– Access to Manufacturing Process Information

– Increased Designer Productivity

• ManufacturingManufacturing– Increase

Throughput– Reduce Variability– Improve Inventory

Management– Reduce Set Up– Improve Efficiency– Improve Quality– Simplify Procedures– Reduce Tooling

Page 8: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 8Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

Classification and Classification and Coding (1)Coding (1)

• ClassificationClassification– Grouping of Like Things– Based on Physical or Process

Attributes– Logical and Systematic

• CodingCoding– Shorthand Notation for Complex Ideas

Page 9: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 9Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

Classification and Classification and Coding (2)Coding (2)• ClassificationClassification

– All - Embracing– Mutually Exclusive– Based on “Permanent” Characteristics– Reflect Users’ Objective and

Nomenclature

• CodingCoding– Set of Symbols to which a Meaning has

been Assigned– Will Database Technology Render

Coding Obsolete?

Page 10: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 10Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

Group Technology – Group Technology – Grouping Attributes (1)Grouping Attributes (1)• ShapeShape• Form FeaturesForm Features• TreatmentsTreatments• FunctionsFunctions• Size EnvelopesSize Envelopes• ToleranceTolerance

Page 11: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 11Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

Group Technology – Group Technology – Grouping Attributes (2)Grouping Attributes (2)

• Surface FinishSurface Finish• Material Type/ConditionMaterial Type/Condition• QuantityQuantity• Next AssemblyNext Assembly• Raw Material FormRaw Material Form• … … (Others Based on (Others Based on

Application/User)Application/User)

Page 12: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 12Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

Group Technology – Group Technology – Grouping MethodsGrouping Methods

• Visual Inspection of Existing PartsVisual Inspection of Existing Parts– Usually Done As Parts are Made

• Using Codes Defined During DesignUsing Codes Defined During Design– Pattern Recognition (Similarity)

• Features• Processes

• QueryQuery– Characteristics in Database

• Derived Attributes• Additionally Input Attributes

Page 13: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 13Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

Monocode (1)Monocode (1)

• Additional Digits Amplifies Additional Digits Amplifies Previous DigitPrevious Digit– Digit 1 = 1 -> Component

•Digit 2 = 4 ->Cylinder– Digit 3 = Diameter, Digit 4 = Length, …

•Digit 2 = 5 -> Rectangular– Digit 3 = Length, Digit 4= Width,– Digit 5 = Height, etc

Page 14: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 14Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

Monocode (2)Monocode (2)

• Additional Digits Amplifies Additional Digits Amplifies Previous DigitPrevious Digit– Digit 1 = 2 -> Assembly

•Digit 2 = ->Assembly Method– 1 = Mechanical

•Digit 3 = -> Assembly Parameter– IF Digit 2 =1, Digit 3= Type of Fastener– IF Digit 2 = 2 (Weld), Digit 3 = Type (Arc,

…)

Page 15: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 15Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

Monocode (3)Monocode (3)

• Additional Digits Amplifies Additional Digits Amplifies Previous DigitPrevious Digit– Large Number of Combinations

Possible•N1 x N2 x N3 x N4 x … Nn

– Difficult for Human Interpretation– Cannot Sort on Single (Internal)

Digit•Meaning Dependant on Preceding Digit

Page 16: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 16Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

PolycodePolycode

• Each Digit Has Single MeaningEach Digit Has Single Meaning– Combinations Possible

•N1 + N2 + N3 + N4 + … + Nn

– Block Code – Not Difficult for Human Interpretation

– Can Sort on Single (Internal) Digit•Meaning Independent of Preceding

Digit

– Long Codes May Result

Page 17: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 17Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

Mixed CodesMixed Codes

• Combines Mono- and Poly- Combines Mono- and Poly- CodingCoding– Attempt to Shorten Code while

Allowing a Larger Number of Possibilities

Page 18: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 18Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

Is Coding Obsolete? (1)Is Coding Obsolete? (1)

• Should Actual Data be Used vs. Should Actual Data be Used vs. a Code Which Inexactly a Code Which Inexactly Represents It?Represents It?– Attributes can be Derived and

Stored Automatically• I.e., Largest Dimension = Length•Use Database Search Engine/Query

to Find Groups – Dynamic – Not Predefined, Flexible

Page 19: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 19Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

Is Coding Obsolete? (2)Is Coding Obsolete? (2)

• Not Quite YetNot Quite Yet– Coding Is Efficient– Legacy Systems Use Coding– Coding Embedded in Corporate

Culture

Page 20: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 20Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

Using Database Using Database Elements for Grouping Elements for Grouping

(1)(1)• ProblemsProblems

– Speed of Search– Requirement to “Exact Match”,

Control of Alphanumeric Elements•Synonyms

– Is 1020 same as 1020 Steel?

•Spelling– Is ALUM same as Alum same as

Aluminium?

•Confusion– Is 305 a Stainless or a Tool Steel?

Page 21: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 21Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

Using Database Using Database Elements for Grouping Elements for Grouping

(2)(2)• SolutionsSolutions

– Indexing Data to Speed Search•Quicker to Search Numeric Fields

– Use Multiple Stage Searches (Code?)

– Requirement to “Exact Match”, Control of Alphanumeric Elements•Use Drop-Down Selections to Control

Input (Must be all-inclusive)•Can Allow Editable Drop Downs But

Maintenance is Required.

Page 22: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 22Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

Using Database Using Database Elements for Grouping Elements for Grouping

(3)(3)MaintenanceMaintenance

– Make System Data Driven•No “Hard Coding”

– Higher Initial Cost– Lower Maintenance

– Requires Diligence and Discipline

Page 23: Group Technology

Advanced Manufacturing Advanced Manufacturing Systems DesignSystems Design

© 2000 © 2000 John W. NazemetzJohn W. Nazemetz

Lecture 5 Topic :Lecture 5 Topic : Group Technology Group Technology

Segment A Topic:Segment A Topic: Definition and Definition and ConceptsConcepts

END OF SEGMENTEND OF SEGMENT

Page 24: Group Technology

Advanced Manufacturing Advanced Manufacturing Systems DesignSystems Design

© 2000 © 2000 John W. NazemetzJohn W. Nazemetz

Lecture 5 Topic :Lecture 5 Topic : Group Technology Group Technology

Segment B Topic:Segment B Topic: Example Example

Page 25: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 25Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

ADVANCED ADVANCED MANUFACTURING MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS DESIGNSYSTEMS DESIGN

Group Technology Group Technology

Example - GTSSExample - GTSS

Page 26: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 26Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

GTSSGTSS

• Group Technology Selection SystemGroup Technology Selection System– Developed for DLA to Assist in

Acquisition– Developed as Part of the CATT Program

Page 27: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 27Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

Overall MissionOverall Mission• Facilitate the Part Acquisition ProcessFacilitate the Part Acquisition Process• Identify Manufacturers with Particular Identify Manufacturers with Particular

CapabilitiesCapabilities• Grouping of Parts by their SimilaritiesGrouping of Parts by their Similarities• Enable Mapping of Manufacturers to Enable Mapping of Manufacturers to

Individual or Groups of Parts Using Individual or Groups of Parts Using Group Technology and Information Group Technology and Information TechnologiesTechnologies

Page 28: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 28Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

Project InitiativeProject Initiative• Create National and Local Versions of Create National and Local Versions of

Part and Vendor Information SystemPart and Vendor Information System• DLA Deployment (DSCR, DSCC)DLA Deployment (DSCR, DSCC)

– SCRA, DSCC, DSCR, OSU– Captures only manufacturers with CAGE

codes

• Oklahoma DeploymentOklahoma Deployment– CATT -- CDS, GTI/ICI Group, OKC-ALC– Captures Oklahoma manufacturers

Page 29: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 29Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

GTSS I nformation Flow

GTSSValue Engr. Division

TDPsvia JEDMICS

VendorData

Partsto be codedor procured

FSC, NIIN, WSC,Part Name, Part No.,Cage Code, Dwg No./Rev.

High-Level Inputs

SAMMS

File of GT coded

Parts

ReportsGroupingMapping

High-Level Outputs

SAMMS

Update

VendorDatabase

Page 30: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 30Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

System FunctionsSystem Functions

• NSN Data EntryNSN Data Entry– Identification Data– GT Code Generation

• Vendor Data EntryVendor Data Entry– Identification Data– Capabilities

• GroupingGrouping• MappingMapping

• Data ManipulationData Manipulation– Entry/Edit Data– Error Checking– File Import/Export– Data Display (Search)– Data Display (Filter)– Data Display (Sort)– Vendor Queries– Report Generation

Page 31: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 31Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

Systems Design Systems Design ConceptsConcepts

• COTS SoftwareCOTS Software– Windows 95– PowerBuilder– Oracle

• SecuritySecurity– Passwords– User Levels

• Data DrivenData Driven– Ease of Maintenance

• Graphical InterfaceGraphical Interface– Easy to Use– Intuitive– Simple

• Group Technology Group Technology – Part Feature Based Part

and Vendor Codes

• On-Line HelpOn-Line Help– Easy to Use

Page 32: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 32Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

Data Base Design Data Base Design ConceptsConcepts

• Balance Data Detail Level, DB SizeBalance Data Detail Level, DB Size– Longer/Deeper Code

• Better Data Resolution, But Data Base Grows Exponentially

– Use Auxiliary Fields to Reduce DB Size

• Hybrid Group Technology CodeHybrid Group Technology Code– First Positions used to Define Rest of

Code– Same Code for Vendors and Parts

• Parts have a Single Code• Vendors have Multiple Codes

Page 33: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 33Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

Data Base Design Data Base Design Concepts Concepts (cont.)(cont.)

• Impact of Code Length/Depth on DBImpact of Code Length/Depth on DB– Number of categories is product of number

of positions and number of possible selections

– Example: For a 10 position code with each code position having 5 possible selections, 9,765,625 possible combinations/categories• While a part would have only one code, a vendor

who can make everything has nearly 10 million.

Page 34: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 34Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

Data Base Design Data Base Design Concepts Concepts (cont.)(cont.)

• Impact of Auxiliary FieldsImpact of Auxiliary Fields– If data is stored in an auxiliary field

rather than a code digit, DB size is reduced

– Example: if auxiliary field were used to reduce a 10 position, 5 selection code to 7 positions, 5 selections, the number of possible combinations is 78,125, not 9,765,625

Page 35: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 35Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

Data Base Design Data Base Design Concepts Concepts (cont.)(cont.)

• Data in GT CodeData in GT Code– Material Type

[2]– Shape [4]– Raw Mat’l Form [4]– Alt. Mat’l Form [4]– Size [5,30]– Tolerances [4]– Quality

[4]• approximately

53,760 possible categories

• Data in Auxiliary Data in Auxiliary FieldsFields– Material Spec Type– Material Spec– Plating– Treatment– Coating– Material Name

• if these fields in code @ 10 selections each, one half trillion categories

Page 36: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 36Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

GT Code Design GT Code Design ConceptsConcepts

• First Two Code Positions Are FixedFirst Two Code Positions Are Fixed– Part Type (Initial Project Scope)

• Mechanical Piece Part• Mechanical Subassembly

– Shape• Prismatic, Cylindrical, Sculptured, Gears• Not Used for subassemblies

Page 37: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 37Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

GT Code Design GT Code Design Concepts Concepts (cont.)(cont.)

• Remaining Code ElementsRemaining Code Elements– Piece Parts

• Size • Tolerances• Raw Material Form• Alt. Raw Material Form• Quality Req.

– Subassemblies• Kitted/Assembly• Weight• Size• Fabrication/

Machining• Tolerances• Quality Req.

Page 38: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 38Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

GUI Design ConceptsGUI Design Concepts• Follows WINDOWS StandardsFollows WINDOWS Standards

– Main Toolbar w/Dropdown menus– Relocatable Icon Toolbar– Right Mouse Button Activated

Response Windows– Context Sensitive Help Available– Dynamic Error Checking

Page 39: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 39Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

Summary/AssessmentSummary/Assessment• ConceptsConcepts

– Theoretically Sound– Method of Coding Manufacturers Was

Awkward

• ProblemsProblems– No Funds for Legacy Part Coding

• UseUse– Used to Identify Suppliers

Page 40: Group Technology

Advanced Manufacturing Advanced Manufacturing Systems DesignSystems Design

© 2000 © 2000 John W. NazemetzJohn W. Nazemetz

Lecture 5 Topic :Lecture 5 Topic : Group Technology Group Technology

Segment B Topic:Segment B Topic: Example Example

END OF SEGMENT END OF SEGMENT

Page 41: Group Technology

Advanced Manufacturing Advanced Manufacturing Systems DesignSystems Design

© 2000 © 2000 John W. NazemetzJohn W. Nazemetz

Lecture 5 Topic :Lecture 5 Topic : Group Technology Group Technology

Segment C Topic:Segment C Topic: Grouping – Grouping – Analysis MethodsAnalysis Methods

Page 42: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 42Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

ADVANCED ADVANCED MANUFACTURING MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS DESIGNSYSTEMS DESIGN

Group Technology Group Technology

Grouping – Analysis MethodsGrouping – Analysis Methods

Page 43: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 43Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

OverviewOverview• Grouping/Analysis MethodsGrouping/Analysis Methods

– Production Flow Analysis• Rank Order Clustering• Similarity Indexes

– Single Linkage– Weighted (Production Volume)

• Mathematical Programming

• NOTE: The Following Slide Materials are NOTE: The Following Slide Materials are From Singh, From Singh, Systems Approach to Systems Approach to Computer Integrated Design and Computer Integrated Design and ManufacturingManufacturing, p. 490-499., p. 490-499.

Page 44: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 44Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

Production Flow Production Flow AnalysisAnalysis

Page 45: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 45Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

ProductioProductionn

Flow Flow AnalysisAnalysis

Matrix

Manipulation

Row and ColumnSorting

Page 46: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 46Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

Rank Order Clustering Rank Order Clustering (1)(1)

Page 47: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 47Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

Rank Order Clustering (2)Rank Order Clustering (2)

Page 48: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 48Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

Rank Order Clustering (3)Rank Order Clustering (3)

Page 49: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 49Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

Single Linkage Cluster Single Linkage Cluster Algorithm (1)Algorithm (1)

Page 50: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 50Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

Single Linkage Cluster Single Linkage Cluster Algorithm (2)Algorithm (2)

Page 51: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 51Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

Single Linkage Cluster Single Linkage Cluster Algorithm (3)Algorithm (3)

Page 52: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 52Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

Siefoddini and WolfeSiefoddini and Wolfe

• Considers Production Volume Considers Production Volume (Weighted Average)(Weighted Average)

Page 53: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 53Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

Exceptional Parts and Exceptional Parts and Bottleneck MachinesBottleneck Machines

• Practical Approach to Problem of Practical Approach to Problem of Costly EquipmentCostly Equipment

• Allow InterCell MovementAllow InterCell Movement• EliminationElimination

– Generate Alternate Processing Plans– Duplicate Machines– Subcontracting Operations

• Still Has InterCell Transfers

Page 54: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 54Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

Alternate Cell Alternate Cell Configurations (SLCA)Configurations (SLCA)

Page 55: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 55Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

Alternate Cell Alternate Cell Configuration AnalysisConfiguration Analysis

Why Why

CellCell

One?One?

Page 56: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 56Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

Mathematical ModelsMathematical Models

• Cell Design with Known Part FamiliesCell Design with Known Part Families– Minimize Machine Investment

• Cell Design with Unknown Part Cell Design with Unknown Part FamiliesFamilies– Minimize Machine Investment– Constrains Maximum Number of Machines

in Cell

• Cell Design With Unknown Part Cell Design With Unknown Part Families, Key MachinesFamilies, Key Machines– Minimize Investment,

Movement/Backtracking

Page 57: Group Technology

© 2000 John W. NazemetzSlide 57Computer Integrated

Manufacturing Systems

Grouping EfficacyGrouping Efficacy

• Method for Evaluating Goodness of Method for Evaluating Goodness of FitFit

Page 58: Group Technology

Advanced Manufacturing Advanced Manufacturing Systems DesignSystems Design

© 2000 © 2000 John W. NazemetzJohn W. Nazemetz

Group TechnologyGroup Technology

Discussion Topic C:Discussion Topic C: Grouping -- Grouping -- Analysis MethodsAnalysis Methods

END OF SEGMENTEND OF SEGMENT