group project presentation - 2 (final)

22

Click here to load reader

Upload: anuj-ramdas

Post on 16-Apr-2017

1.038 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Group Project Presentation - 2 (Final)

Design of Portland BuildingDetailed design

Department of Civil & Structural Engineering

Nabeel Jafri Vishal KrishnanJohn Muramya

Anuj RamdasMuhammad Shah

GROUP 8

Page 2: Group Project Presentation - 2 (Final)

Department of Civil & Structural Engineering

Structural layout – Residential floors

Page 3: Group Project Presentation - 2 (Final)

Department of Civil & Structural Engineering

Structural layout – Ground floor

Page 4: Group Project Presentation - 2 (Final)

Department of Civil & Structural Engineering

Structural layout Basement

-5 columns to be supported by beams-Ramp slope limited to 1:3-Minimum clear distance of 2.5 m between columns maintained

Page 5: Group Project Presentation - 2 (Final)

Department of Civil & Structural Engineering

Vertical Section

-Maximum beam depth for ground and residential floor is 406 mm-Maximum beam depth in basement is 1016mm-Maximum column size is UKC305x305x89-Raft foundation with piles reaching bedrock

Page 6: Group Project Presentation - 2 (Final)

Department of Civil & Structural Engineering

Retaining Wall & Foundation

Page 7: Group Project Presentation - 2 (Final)

Department of Civil & Structural Engineering

Base plate

Page 8: Group Project Presentation - 2 (Final)

Department of Civil & Structural Engineering

Column base plates

Base Plate Column Column Section Steel Grade Bolts No of bolts Thickness Width Length

BP1 A1 UKC 203 x 203 x 52 S275 M20 Grade 8.8 8 15 270 280

BP2 A3 UKC 254 x 254 x 89 S275 M20 Grade 8.8 8 25 400 400

BP3 A5 UKC 305 x 305 x 97 S275 M20 Grade 8.8 8 25 410 420

BP4 A8 UKC 254 x 254 x 89 S275 M20 Grade 8.8 8 25 400 400

BP5 A10 UKC 203 x 203 x 52 S275 M20 Grade 8.8 8 15 270 280

BP6 B7 UKC 305 x 305 x 97 S275 M20 Grade 8.8 8 25 410 420

BP7 C1 UKC 254 x 254 x 89 S275 M20 Grade 8.8 8 25 400 400

BP8 C3 UKC 356 x 368 x 153 S275 M20 Grade 8.8 8 30 520 520

BP9 C4 UKC 203 x 203 x 86 S275 M20 Grade 8.8 8 20 300 320

BP10 C8 UKC 356 x 368 x 153 S275 M20 Grade 8.8 8 30 520 520

BP11 C10 UKC 254 x 254 x 89 S275 M20 Grade 8.8 8 25 400 400

BP12 D7 UKC 305 x 305 x 118 S275 M20 Grade 8.8 8 30 450 450

Page 9: Group Project Presentation - 2 (Final)

Department of Civil & Structural Engineering

Beam to beam connection

Page 10: Group Project Presentation - 2 (Final)

Department of Civil & Structural Engineering

Beam to beam connection

Page 11: Group Project Presentation - 2 (Final)

Department of Civil & Structural Engineering

Beam to beam connection

Page 12: Group Project Presentation - 2 (Final)

Department of Civil & Structural Engineering

Beam to beam connections

Connection Type Supporting Beam

Supported Beam 1

Supported Beam 2 Fitting N notch d

Bolt gauge mm

Weldsmm

Holes dia mm

Dia. of bolts

Residential Floor                

RC1 EA2 406 x 140 x 39 203 x 133 x 25  ---- 150 x 8 90 30 90 6 22 20

RC2 EA2 406 x 140 x 39 203 x 133 x 30  ---- 150 x 8 90 30 90  6 22 20

Ground Floor                  

GC1 EA2 406 x 140 x 39 203 x 133 x 25  ----  150 x 8 90 30 90 6 22 20

GC2 EA2 406 x 140 x 39 203 x 133 x 30  ----  150 x 8 90 30 90 6 22 20

Basement                  

BC1 EA4 610 x 229 x 101 406 x 178 x 74 406 x 178 x 74 150 x 8 130 40 90 6 22 20

BC2 EA4 457 x 191 x 67 406 x 178 x 74  ----  150 x 8 110 30 90 6 22 20

BC3 EB11 1016 x 305 x 272 406 x 178 x 74 914 x 305 x 201 200 x 10 170 50 140 8 22 20

BC4 EB6 686 x 254 x 125 533 x 210 x 92  ----  200 x 10 142 50 140 6 22 20

BC5 EA4 762 x 267 x 134 457 x 191 x 82  ----  150 x 8 150 50 90 6 22 20

Page 13: Group Project Presentation - 2 (Final)

Department of Civil & Structural Engineering

Column supported by beam

-Typical detail of discontinued column supported by beam-Point load of 6120 kN acting on to the beam-Column supported by beam at 5 locations in Basement

Page 14: Group Project Presentation - 2 (Final)

Department of Civil & Structural Engineering

Splice Details

Page 15: Group Project Presentation - 2 (Final)

Department of Civil & Structural Engineering

Column splices

Splice(Grid no)

Height of end plate (hp)

End plate thickness (tp)

End plate width (bp)

BoltThroat Length

No Size e1 e2 p1 p3

Residential

A1 300 12 120 10 20 30 20 60 80 4 6

B1 300 12 120 10 20 30 20 60 80 4 6

C1 300 12 120 10 20 30 20 60 80 4 6

D1 300 12 120 10 20 30 20 60 80 4 6

E2 300 12 120 10 20 30 20 60 80 4 6

BasementA1 300 12 120 10 20 30 20 60 80 4 6

B1 300 12 120 10 20 30 20 60 80 4 6

B4 600 12 200 16 20 20 25 80 150 7 15

C1 300 12 120 10 20 30 20 60 80 4 6

D1 300 12 120 10 20 30 20 60 80 4 6

E2 300 12 120 10 20 30 20 60 80 4 6

G2 300 12 120 10 20 30 20 60 80 4 6

H2 300 12 120 10 20 30 20 60 80 4 6

Page 16: Group Project Presentation - 2 (Final)

Department of Civil & Structural Engineering

Beam to column connection

-Typical beam to column connection detail-Flexible end plate connection acting as a pin joint-Connection manufactured in factory and transported to site

Page 17: Group Project Presentation - 2 (Final)

Department of Civil & Structural Engineering

Beam to column connections

Grid no Height of end plate (hp) End plate thickness (tp) End plate width (bp)

Bolt

Throat LengthNo Size e1 e2 p1 p3

ResidentialA1 300 12 120 10 20 30 20 60 80 4 6

B1 300 12 120 10 20 30 20 60 80 4 6

C1 300 12 120 10 20 30 20 60 80 4 6

D1 300 12 120 10 20 30 20 60 80 4 6

E2 300 12 120 10 20 30 20 60 80 4 6

BasementA1 300 12 120 10 20 30 20 60 80 4 6

B1 300 12 120 10 20 30 20 60 80 4 6

B4 600 12 200 16 20 20 25 80 150 7 15

C1 300 12 120 10 20 30 20 60 80 4 6

D1 300 12 120 10 20 30 20 60 80 4 6

E2 300 12 120 10 20 30 20 60 80 4 6

G2 300 12 120 10 20 30 20 60 80 4 6

H2 300 12 120 10 20 30 20 60 80 4 6

Page 18: Group Project Presentation - 2 (Final)

Department of Civil & Structural Engineering

Wind analysis

-The basic wind speed provided was 22 m/s-The calculations of forces due to wind were carried out using BS6399-2:1997-Forces applied at each level along with EHF for designing bracings

Page 19: Group Project Presentation - 2 (Final)

Department of Civil & Structural Engineering

Bracing and bracing connection

-Most efficient way of transferring lateral loads to ground-Inverted V bracing selected to accommodate windows-Two braced bays provided on each face to resist win loads and EHF due to frame imperfections

Page 20: Group Project Presentation - 2 (Final)

Department of Civil & Structural Engineering

Frame stability

Level HEd (kN) h (m) VEd (kN) δH,Ed (mm) αcr CheckTop Roof 23.85 3.15 1444.57 3.78 13.76 OK

9 72.00 3.15 4704.63 3.86 12.49 OK8 120.16 3.15 7964.69 4.00 11.88 OK7 168.32 3.15 11224.75 4.10 11.52 OK6 216.47 3.15 14484.81 4.15 11.34 OK5 264.63 3.15 17744.87 4.11 11.43 OK4 312.79 3.15 21004.93 3.97 11.82 OK3 360.95 3.15 24264.99 3.68 12.73 OK2 409.10 3.15 27525.05 3.30 14.19 OK1 457.26 3.15 30785.11 3.06 15.29 OKG 505.42 4.15 34045.17 1.24 49.68 OK

-Second order effects for the frame can be assumed to be small to be neglected if the value of αcr < 10 from elastic analysis [αcr = [HEd x h] / [VEd x δH,Ed] ]-The condition was satisfied as displayed in the table below

Page 21: Group Project Presentation - 2 (Final)

Department of Civil & Structural Engineering

Floor system

-Precast hollow core concrete slabs-Depth of slab 200mm, capable of carrying 15 kN / m2 imposed load-Provides diaphragm action transferring lateral loads-Better thermal performance of the building-Speed of Erection-Standard precast floors can be supplied with a fire resistance of up to two hours-Dry construction system

Page 22: Group Project Presentation - 2 (Final)

Department of Civil & Structural Engineering

Aerial view