ground testing technical committee gttc newsletter
TRANSCRIPT
Issue No 30 Summer 2010
Ground Testing Technical Committee
GTTC Newsletter
June 2010
Issue No 30 Summer 2010
http://www.aiaa.org/tc/gt/gttchome.html Page 1
GTTC Chairman’s Message Thank you for picking up the 30
th edition of the Ground Test Technical
Committee (GTTC) Newsletter. This newsletter is utilized to keep the AIAA
members and others informed on the GTTC activities, membership, and the
activities of the membership organizations. I hope that you will find that it
serves it purpose well. Special thanks go to the newsletter editor, Tony Skaff,
of Sierra Lobo, Inc.
The GTTC meetings at the 27th AIAA Aerodynamic Measurement Technology and Ground Testing Conference are my
first as Chair of the GTTC. I would like to take this opportunity to thank my predecessor Dave Cahill, of the Aerospace
Testing Alliance, for his many contributions to the GTTC and ground testing community. I also would like to thank the
committee members who completed their service at the end of the last meeting.
The GTTC has a slate of new members attending the AMT/GT conference who were selected at the GTTC meeting held
in conjunction with the AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting back in January. They will quickly be integrated into the
GTTC activities and provide contributions through our subcommittees, working groups, focus groups, technical sessions,
and publications. Feel free to attend any of the GTTC meetings at the conference and the working groups in particular are
always looking for participation from outside of the GTTC. The GTTC is a very active AIAA Technical Committee but
we also like to have fun as well. Our team building activity at the conference is to take in a baseball game at Wrigley
Field.
I hope you enjoy this issue the GTTC newsletter. We are always looking for ways to improve the GTTC and our overall
value to the aerospace community. Your ideas (and participation – see the request for membership section in this
newsletter) are greatly appreciated. If you have questions or want information about the GTTC, you can contact me
directly at [email protected] or by phone at 770-494-4158. If you have an opportunity, check out our website linked
off the AIAA Technical Committees page on the AIAA web site (www.aiaa.org).
Thank You,
Joe Patrick
GTTC Chairman
GTTC Seeking Members with Propulsion Backgrounds
Each year in January, the GTTC selects new members from the applications that are received by November 1. We try to
strike a balance in our membership so that we have an equal representation from government, industry, and academia. In
addition, we try to balance our membership between our two major ground test subcommittees, Aerodynamics and
Propulsion. We are currently seeking applications from persons with propulsion-related ground testing experience.
Whether you are an engineer or a manager in the field of propulsion testing, please consider submitting your application
to the GTTC. The articles in this newsletter show the wide range of activities within our technical committee. If you
want to join a technical committee that is busy, vibrant, and striving to make an impact on the ground testing community,
please consider applying. To apply for membership on any AIAA TC select the “Quick Links” on the AIAA home page
(http://www.aiaa.org/).
Issue No 30 Summer 2010
http://www.aiaa.org/tc/gt/gttchome.html Page 2
About the GTTC
The GTTC is one of more than 60 technical committees
sponsored by the American Institute of Aeronautics and
Astronautics (AIAA). It is made up of approximately 50
professionals working in various areas of the ground
testing world.
Our membership addresses important technical issues that
affect ground testing through several means, including the
development of guides and standards, dissemination of
information through technical sessions at conferences, and
the development and sponsorship of short courses.
The GTTC also participates in Congressional Visits Day,
which is a vital tool for making sure that aeronautics and
space-related research and testing is supported at required
levels.
One of the primary functions of every technical committee
is the sponsorship and development of conferences and
technical sessions. The GTTC supports two conferences
each year. Every January, the GTTC meets at the
Aerospace Sciences Meeting, where we sponsor several
technical sessions (typically a dozen or more). In the
summer, the GTTC alternates between the Joint Propulsion
Conference (odd-numbered years) and the Advanced
Measurement Technology and Ground Testing Conference
(even-numbered years).
GTTC Working Groups
Flow Quality Working Group
Chair: Iwan Philipsen
Vice-Chair: Dale Belter
Model Attitude and Deformation Working Group
Chair: Brad Crawford
Vice-Chair: David Smith
Wind Tunnel Database Working Group
Chair: Jeff Haas
Vice-Chair: Richard White
Ground Test Technical Committee
Chair: Joe Patrick
Vice-Chair: Ray Castner
Secretary: Steve Dunn
Steering Subcommittee
Chair: Joe Patrick
Vice Chair: Ray Castner
Membership Subcommittee
Chair: Ray Castner
Vice Chair: Steve Dunn
Aerodynamics Subcommittee
Chair: Vic Cannacci
Vice Chair: Jerry Kegelman
Propulsion Subcommittee
Chair: King Molder
Vice Chair: Mike Wrenn
Awards Subcommittee
Chair: Joe Norris
Vice-Chair: Wink Baker
Conferences Subcommittee
Chair: Steve Dunn
Vice Chair: Amber Favaregh
Publications Subcommittee
Chair: Steve Dunn
Vice-Chair: Julien Weiss
Standards Subcommittee
Chair: Doyle Veazey
Vice Chair: Rich White
Education and Student Activities Subcommittee
Chair: Stewart Lumb
Vice Chair: Justin Smith
GTTC Subcommittees
Issue No 30 Summer 2010
http://www.aiaa.org/tc/gt/gttchome.html Page 3
By Philip Lorenz III, AEDC/PA
The upcoming launch has caught the attention of engineers,
technicians and craftsmen at AEDC who supported the X-37 program
over the years.
"It's great to see the data we provided from Tunnel 9 on the X-37
directly supporting the upcoming hypersonic flight test," said Joe
Coblish, projects group team leader at AEDC's Hypervelocity Wind
Tunnel 9. "It's an exciting time in the field of hypersonics.
"In the flight regime of hypersonics, we test cutting-edge
experimental configurations that do not always make it to flight," he
continued. "Flying at hypersonic speeds can present extreme design
challenges to system developers and developing cost-effective
solutions in today's economic environment can be difficult on
shrinking budgets."
Tunnel 9 supported the X-37 twice while it was a NASA program,
first in 1999 and again in 2003.
"Both tests looked at high alpha - up to 60 degrees angle of attack -
reentry aerodynamics," Coblish said. "[This] required the Mach 14
capability at Tunnel 9, being it is the highest Mach number wind
tunnel in the U.S. capable of collecting integrated force and moment
data."
John Hopf, a senior project engineer at AEDC, is proud of the role he
and his coworkers had in testing the X-37 in the von Kàrmàn Gas
Dynamics Facility Tunnels A, B and C in 2001 and 2004.
"I consider the X-37 jet interaction test my favorite test during my 24-
year career at AEDC because it served as a valuable learning
opportunity for me by offering numerous technical challenges," he
said. "I relied heavily on the expertise of a very experienced and
dedicated core test team at VKF to meet and exceed the customer's
expectations by achieving the all of test objectives with a minimal
number of delays or problems."
According to Air Force officials, the X-37B is similar to the space shuttle except it is about a fourth the size and
unmanned. The OTV, at 27.5 feet long with a 15-foot wingspan, will operate in low Earth orbit like the space shuttle and
will "take a suite of next-generation technologies to orbit."
AEDC Testers React To First Orbital Flight Test of X-37
Ground Testing News
Figure 1 - 4/16/2010 - ARNOLD AIR FORCE
BASE, Tenn. -- The U.S. Air Force-Boeing X-37B
orbital test vehicle (OTV) is set to launch into space
atop an Atlas V booster from Cape Canaveral, Fla.,
April 21.
Issue No 30 Summer 2010
http://www.aiaa.org/tc/gt/gttchome.html Page 4
Full-Scale Crash Test of a MD Helicopter Conducted at NASA Langley
Submitted by Karen Jackson
Two full-scale crash tests of a MD-500 helicopter fuselage
body were successfully conducted at NASA Langley
Research Center in Hampton, VA, using the Landing and
Impact (LandIR) Facility during the months of December
2009 and March 2010. These tests were designed to
generate comparative baseline hard landing crash data for
the MD-500 helicopter, while retrofitted with and without
custom deployable energy absorbers (DEA). Test objectives
were to produce anthropomorphic data from a Human
Surrogate Torso Model (HSTM), which is part of an
anatomically-correct fully-instrumented test dummy and also
to generate data to validate a system-integrated finite
element simulation. The HSTM data will be used to assess
thoracic soft tissue injury mechanisms, including aortic
rupture, during helicopter crash events.
Crash preparations for the vehicle included installing an
onboard data acquisition system, crew and passenger
seating, and additional ballast throughout to represent the
mass and inertial properties of fuel, rotor transmission, and
the engine. The HSTM package, provided by the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory as part of an
Interagency Agreement (IA1-983) between NASA and the Office of the Secretary of Defense, was attached to the pelvis
and legs of a Hybrid III 50th percentile male anthropomorphic test device (ATD). This ATD was seated in the left rear
passenger crew seat along three other 50th percentile male ATDs, seated in the pilot, copilot, and other rear passenger
crew seat. Discrete targets were mounted to the vehicle’s outer airframe for collecting 2-D and 3-D motion tracking data
using photogrammetry. In addition to the photogrammetry data, twelve external and four internal cameras were used to
record real time and high-speed motion pictures of the impact event. The final test article weighed 2,906 lb, which is
94 lb less than the maximum gross take-off weight of the actual vehicle. The test article impacted the concrete surface
beneath the LandIR (gantry) facility at approximate velocities of 40-ft/s forward and 26-ft/s vertical providing a net
resultant velocity of 48-ft/s.
Preliminary assessment of the test data indicates that the crew and passenger ATDs experienced peak pelvic accelerations
of 40-g, compared with 10-g in the test with the deployable energy absorber (DEA). Maximum ATD lumbar loads were
2,000-lb., compared with 700 lb. in the test with the DEA. According to FAR 27.562 (c) specifications, human lumbar
loads should not exceed 1,500 lbs, which is the threshold for injury. 2-D and 3-D photogrammetric target tracking data
were collected using high-speed digital cameras, providing an accurate assessment of the helicopter trajectory and impact.
In addition, a total of 158 channels of on-board data were successfully collected at a rate of 10,000 samples per second
from accelerometers, strain gages, and load cells.
Points of Contact:
Figure 2 - MD-500 helicopter impact test, using deployable
energy absorbers.
Issue No 30 Summer 2010
http://www.aiaa.org/tc/gt/gttchome.html Page 5
JAXA Complete Final Qualification Tests of Liquid Hydrogen-fueled Hypersonic Turbojet Engine
By Yasushi Nakata
Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) completes the second series of ground firing tests of the scaled liquid
hydrogen-fueled hypersonic turbojet engine including SLS firing tests in September 2009 at Noshiro Testing Center
(Fig. 3) and altitude tests at Mach 0.8-1.6 condition in December 2009 at Chofu Aerospace Research Center (Fig. 4).
JAXA’s hypersonic turbojet engine is operable from SLS to Mach 5 in-flight condition with single flow-path due to its air
pre-cooling device using liquid hydrogen fuel as a coolant for protecting turbo-machinery from aerodynamic heating. The
engine is installed on the Balloon-based Operation Vehicle (BOV), which can accelerate itself up to Mach 2 by diving
from high altitude balloon at the altitude of 40 km. Engine testing duration (from the balloon separation to parachute
activation) can be extended up to 100 sec by a pullout maneuver with all moving tails. Difficulties on this flight
experiment are concerning with quickly changing environmental conditions (inlet pressure, temperature, and flight
attitude). After investigating hydrogen burner ignitability and windmilling characteristics of the turbo-machinery in the
altitude testing facility, windmilling start-up sequence for a stable engine operation was established in the simulated flight
environment. Effect of gravity direction change on the propellant and propulsion system was also investigated by laying
the vehicle at nose-down attitude during engine firing test as shown in the Fig. 3. The gravity effect was found to be
negligible from the fact that the engine operation in vertical attitude condition does not differ that of horizontal attitude
condition. Now we are ready for the first flight test of the hypersonic turbojet engine, which is scheduled in 2010 at Taiki
Aerospace Research Field on Hokkaido Island.
Figure 3 - Qualification tests of the hypersonic turbojet engine being equipped on the vehicle at the liquid
hydrogen engine test facility (September, 2009).
Figure 4 - Altitude testing of the engine with a supersonic inlet at Mach 1.6 condition in the ATF (December, 2009).
Issue No 30 Summer 2010
http://www.aiaa.org/tc/gt/gttchome.html Page 6
Normal Shock Hybrid Flow Control Test
By Mary J. Gibson
15 x 15 cm Supersonic Wind Tunnel Facility, W-6B
Engines Research Building
Led by researchers Stefanie Hirt and Manan Vyas of the
Inlet and Nozzles Branch (Aeropropulsion Research
Testing Division) at NASA Glenn Research Center, the
normal shock hybrid flow control test was conducted to
validate CFD solutions regarding the effect of using
microramp devices and air injection on normal shock
interaction. In this project, the test model shape
produced a normal shock in the tunnel, microramp
devices of varying geometries were installed, and air was
injected at a range of blowing rates from blowing holes.
Data were obtained through the use of a translational
total pressure probe, sidewall static ports, Schlieren
images and oil flow visualization (pictured below). For
the configurations tested, CFD results indicate
significant promise in the use of microramp flow control
for reducing separation in the presence of shock wave
boundary layer interactions. Full scale inlets incorporating microramp and hybrid flow control are currently being
designed to be tested in the 8x6 and 10x10 SWTs at NASA GRC.
Testing support provided by Mary Gibson (Mechanical Test Engineer), John DeArmon and Brent Seifert (Electrical
Engineer), Ronald Foster and Cleve Horn (Mechanical Technician).
The Exploration Technology Development Program Liquid Oxygen/Liquid Methane Test
Submitted by Vic Cannacci
The Exploration Technology Development Program
(ETDP) Propulsion and Cryogenic Advanced
Development (PCAD) project has been performing
technology development of non-toxic propulsion systems
to enable safe and cost effective exploration missions. In
support of PCAD, NASA Glenn Research Center has
developed liquid oxygen/liquid methane propellant
conditioning systems to test PCAD-funded Aerojet 100-lbf
Reaction Control Engines (RCEs) and other similar class
engines. The objective of the propellant conditioning
systems is to both subcool or heat the cryogenic propellant
to the engine inlet valves to more closely simulate the
conditions an engine would see when propellants are
stored in space. Performance testing of the afore
mentioned engine was recently completed in the Altitude
Combustion Stand at GRC with the propellant
conditioning systems, over a range of inlet temperature
and pressures and propellant mixture ratios.
Figure 5 – Oil flow visualization.
Figure 6 – Aerojet 100 lbf engine undergoing test.
Issue No 30 Summer 2010
http://www.aiaa.org/tc/gt/gttchome.html Page 7
Open Rotor Propulsion Rig Update
By Jon Salek, TFOME
Originally tested in the mid 1980’s at NASA Glenn, then it was known as the Model Propulsion Simulator (MPS) Test
Rig SN003. It is now known as the ORPR (Open Rotor Propulsion Rig). The ORPR consists of two counter rotating
spools with a non-rotating center shaft. Each of the two counter rotating spools is attached to a two-stage turbine on the
aft end with the fan blades, hub and force balance on the forward end. Each of the two fan blade sets are driven by a
multistage air turbine drive supplied by 300 PSIG air heated to 200°F.
Refurbishment was completed in October 2009 and
consisted of a general inspection and rebuild of the
mechanical components, an inspection and replacement (as
necessary) of all instrumentation, refurbishment of the
forward and aft rotating force balances and replacement of
the telemetry system. The refurbishment was a long and
slow process due to the complexity of a counter rotating
design and the challenges it brings to the routing of
instrumentation and precise positioning and balance of
internal hardware.
Testing in the 9x15 low speed wind tunnel (LSWT) began
on October 2009 and will continue into the middle of the
year. Testing in the 8x6 high speed wind tunnel will begin
later in 2010. First, a 1980s original design blade
(F31/A31) was tested and compared with historical wind
tunnel test data to validate rig and tunnel operation. Once
confident in the ability to take accurate acoustic and
aerodynamic performance data, testing began on modern blade designs that were based on past testing and new more
powerful computer simulation programs. When 8x6 testing is complete, GE will iterate on these blade designs.
The test program is a joint effort between NASA and GE
along with GE’s collaborative partners. The ORPR team is
quite large and consists of both American and International
Engineers that frequently visit the test site to partake in the
data taking and get hands on experience with the ORPR
drive rig. Constant open communication through weekly
teleconferences and daily emailing /phone calls has
allowed the team to stay on the same page and keep
moving forward even during the most fast paced test
schedule.
The test definition is focused around both aerodynamic and
acoustic performance. The novel Open Rotor design
allows for a significant increase in engine efficiency which
results in less fuel burn during fight. However this
efficiency comes with an acoustic challenge which affects
both passengers in the airplane cabin and communities
living close to airports. A majority of the increased engine
noise comes from the shedding of vortices off the forward
blades which then interact with the aft blades creating
uncomfortable tones. GE and its collaborative partners
have been combating this noise issue with different design
ideas while trying to maintain the engine efficiency and
aerodynamic performance advantages.
Figure 7 – Open Rotor Propulsion Rig.
Figure 8 – Front view of ORPR.
Issue No 30 Summer 2010
http://www.aiaa.org/tc/gt/gttchome.html Page 8
The 9x15 LSWT testing simulates take off and landing conditions, we are able to test at speeds up to M=0.22. The test
section is acoustically treated with Kevlar filled porous boxes that allow extremely accurate acoustic data to be taken. 8x6
SWT testing simulates cruise conditions and will test the rig up to speeds of M=0.80 which is the max design cruise speed
for ORPR. Acoustic and aerodynamic performance will also be the main focus of testing during 8x6 SWT entry.
So far the test results have been promising. With constantly rising gas prices, airlines are searching for that next
generation engine that will help not only keep the cost of flying down but also be environmentally friendly. With a
rigorous test schedule and a dedicated team of researchers, engineers, and technicians to support the testing, it is only a matter of
time before we learn if ORPR is the future of commercial flight.
Reaction Control System Testing At ORBITEC
By Joan Hoopes, Orbitec
Orbital Technologies Corporation (ORBITEC) recently conducted testing of a Reaction Control System (RCS) 25lbf
thrust demonstration thruster at ORBITEC and at its partner, the University of Alabama – Huntsville (UAHuntsville).
The MAELSTROM-G25 RCS Demo Thruster is a GOX-GCH4 vortex thrust chamber equipped for direct spark ignition.
The -G25 thruster is designed to meet the mission requirements of a specific in-space application. This thruster features
an oxygen-cooled regen nozzle and a vortex-cooled chamber wall and head end. After flowing through the regen nozzle
coolant channels, the gaseous oxygen is split into two flow paths. Most of the GOX is injected in tangential swirl
elements at the base of the chamber. The remaining GOX flows through the spark plug, shielding the plug face, and is
injected at the chamber head end. An 80:1 expansion skirt can also be installed for altitude testing. The run valves are
close-coupled to the chamber to reduce the manifold priming times and correspondingly, the start-up transient.
This thruster was tested at sea-level conditions in ORBTEC’s Small-Scale Test Facility and at altitude conditions at
UAHuntsville’s Vacuum Test Facility. During the sea-level tests, the chamber was shown to be capable of lighting
Figure 10 - TFOME employee Paul Hleba and NASA Civil
Servant Marty Krupar preparing to disassemble the AFT
hub.
Figure 9 - TFOME Employee Andy Kehrt beginning a model
change to a different blade set.
Issue No 30 Summer 2010
http://www.aiaa.org/tc/gt/gttchome.html Page 9
repeatably and reliably with GOX/Methane. The regeneratively cooled nozzle performed very well and survived test
durations of up to 15 seconds. The vortex combustion cold-wall effect was shown to successfully shield the chamber
walls and head-end. The chamber was also shown to perform well during pulsed operations.
After integrating the test article into the vacuum chamber at the UAHuntsville Propulsion Research Center, tests were
conducted at simulated altitude conditions (up to 150,000 ft). During these tests, the thruster demonstrated repeatable and
reliable ignition at altitude, demonstrate pulse train operation, and demonstrated a 50% duty cycle over 30 seconds of
operation with the regen nozzle. These altitude tests were also used to evaluate the performance of the functionally-
gradient material (FGM) expansion skirt.
For more information about ORBITEC please contact:
Paul J. Zamprelli, Business Development Director
or
Joan Hoopes, Facility Manager:
For more information about UAHuntsville Propulsion Research Center please contact:
Dr. Robert A. Frederick, Jr., Interim Director
Tunnel 9 Ushers In New Paradigm For Evaluation And Test
By Janaé Daniels, AEDC/PA
3/18/2010 - Arnold Air Force Base, Tenn. For the past year, engineers at the Hypervelocity Wind Tunnel 9 located at
Arnold Engineering Development Center's (AEDC) White Oak location renovated their main tunnel controller. They
installed a state-of-the-art digital control room and completed a successful return to service, verifying all aspects of the
facility operation.
To validate Tunnel 9 as fully operational required a detailed and demanding process of deliberately increasing the throttle
of the facility until full pressure and temperature were achieved according to Dan Marren, Tunnel 9 site director. Marren
explained that the final stage for validation would normally involve a standard check model where test cell functionality,
data throughput, and veracity of information can be verified against benchmark data.
"While running a standard check model is anything but standard in Tunnel 9 - high temperatures and pressures with
dynamic angle-of-attack sweep approaching 80 degrees a second - this time it was even more atypical given our enhanced
Figure 11 - RCS Demo Thruster in UAHuntsville’s Vacuum Test Facility
Issue No 30 Summer 2010
http://www.aiaa.org/tc/gt/gttchome.html Page 10
data goals," Marren said. Several high-speed systems under development today will require a more complete
understanding of the challenges that are between technology development and fielding.
AEDC management took this opportunity to determine if
Tunnel 9, which uniquely provides the test environment
necessary for understanding these complex challenges,
could be utilized in a new and innovative way. In the year
preceding the completion of the control room, engineers
readied experiments, methods and instruments to make
measurements that can interrogate more fully the physics-
based phenomenon required.
"Late last year, a proposal was made to replace the
standard sphere cone check model with an actual system
configuration representing the most likely Air Force
solution to the next generation prompt global strike
missile system, HTV-2," Marren said.
The Falcon program is a joint venture by the Defense
Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and the
Air Force. The program's objectives are to develop and
demonstrate hypersonic technologies that will enable
prompt global reach missions. The first flight test is
currently scheduled to fly from Vandenberg Air Force
Base, Calif., to Kwajalein Atoll, Marshall Islands, later
this year.
Marren says this vehicle because of its complex 3-D shape
also challenges the understanding of certain critical physics-based phenomenon and fits the return to service goals. Since
AEDC's Tunnel 9 provided the pre-flight database, that data can be used as a benchmark for validation of the wind tunnel.
"Having a well characterized data set in Tunnel 9 made it the perfect configuration to tell if all systems were a go,"
Marren said. "In addition, this next generation vehicle will require more physics-based design information to get through
development and Tunnel 9 must be ready for that enhanced requirement."
Moving from just supplying air-on test time for the purpose of building an empirically-based data set to a new approach
that seeks to understand the physics driving the most severe design challenges requires the capability to go beyond the
standard data approach and perhaps move out of a comfort zone in customer support.
"Success here will require building partnerships with science and technology activities, inventing test techniques and
methods tuned to obtaining important hard-to-measure quantities and providing data in a format that feeds the weaknesses
in our computational models," Marren said.
The initial quick-look data suggests that all the various technology efforts are producing 100 percent successful results.
"I am amazed at the level of success that has been achieved simultaneously for so many different technologies 'piggy-
backed' together," John Lafferty, Tunnel 9's technical director, said. "This level of success is a testament to the quality of
our people and the rigorous planning involved. According to Marren, this was an opportunity to try this new approach by
reaching out to Tunnel 9 partners with the help of the University of Maryland, Air Force Office of Scientific Research,
Air Force Research Laboratory, Test Evaluation/Science & Technology, NASA and Sandia National Laboratories.
The result is enhanced measurement techniques typically seen only in a laboratory environment now applied in a T&E
facility to a real-world problem that is milestone driven (in this case by a flight test).
According to Dr. Mark Lewis, chair of the Aerospace Engineering Department at the University of Maryland and former
Chief Scientist of the Air Force,
"The hard work in renovating the critical national asset that is Tunnel 9 has clearly paid off on its very first set of runs.
"Preliminary results from the early stages of the project are eye-watering, providing marvelous agreement to some of our
theoretical models. AEDC has outdone itself in leveraging a shakedown test series to perform no fewer than eight
Figure 12 - A Busy Test Cell: In addition to the primary force-
and-moment test article (center), the Tunnel 9 test cell includes
(clockwise from bottom left) a hemisphere probe for developing
heat-transfer and stagnation point sensors, two standard Pitot
probes with high-frequency tunnel noise measurement
capability, and the auxiliary model support system with the
Sandia/Purdue boundary-layer transition research cone.
(Photo by Mike Smith)
Issue No 30 Summer 2010
http://www.aiaa.org/tc/gt/gttchome.html Page 11
significant experiments at once. I am particularly excited by the fact that our students have been right there in the process,
working side by side with AEDC personnel. That is an incredible educational opportunity for those students, but I have
also observed that their presence at Tunnel 9 has added an extra spark of vitality for the AEDC staff members as well."
When return to service checks are completed later this month, Tunnel 9 will have an enhanced information capability
matched with an accurate and capable controller to once again rise to meet the testing needs of advanced hypersonic
systems.
Ascent Abort Testing Successfully Completed at the Sierra Lobo Test Facility
By Steve Grasl, Sierra Lobo, Inc.
Sierra Lobo successfully completed testing recently of a pressure
reduction system intended to simulate a roll control system (RCS)
similar in concept to that planned for the future Ascent Abort
Crew Module (CM) on the Orion spacecraft. Testing was
performed at the Sierra Lobo Test Facility (SLTF) under contract
from NASA Glenn Research Center (GRC). The main purpose of
these tests was to validate preliminary analytical models created
by the design team at NASA-GRC of flows, pressures, and
temperatures of the system over the full duration of system
deployment.
The Ascent Abort Crew Module RCS used for Orion is intended
to induce a roll torque to determine the response of the Crew
Exploration Vehicle (CEV) Parachute Assembly System. The
RCS would also provide rate damping after the drogue chutes
have been deployed, rate damping before and after the induced
roll torque, and operation of a roll control algorithm to
demonstrate the ability to position the CM properly for landing.
The test set-up included four 50-gallon composite overwrapped
pressure vessels (COPVs) that were pressurized with GN2 up to
3,500 psig. The GN2 was then sent through a pressure reduction
system and then a thruster valve that was cycled open and closed
at predetermined frequency and duration to simulate various
mission profiles.
The SLTF is located in Milan, OH, and is also used for
performing other testing. Recent tests include liquid hydrogen
internal combustion engine truck testing for the U.S. Army, Cryocooler testing for AFRL, and internal testing of
cryogenic feed-throughs. Advanced power plant fuel cell testing for a UAV for ONR with liquid hydrogen and liquid
oxygen is also planned in the coming months.
For further information, contact Tony Skaff at [email protected].
www.sierralobo.com
Figure 13 - Sierra Lobo’s Test Facility in Milan,
Ohio.
Issue No 30 Summer 2010
http://www.aiaa.org/tc/gt/gttchome.html Page 12
GTTC Membership Activities
By Tony Skaff
ASM Conference, Orlando, Florida
The 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting was held in Orlando, FL, from January 4-7, 2010 at the Orlando World
Center Marriott , Orlando, FL. The AIAA Ground Test Technical Committee (GTTC) conducted a full slate of meetings,
technical sessions and related activities as a part of this conference. The GTTC sponsored 11 technical sessions with 48
papers. A total of 19 meetings were held to conduct the business of the GTTC during the course of this conference. The
Best Practices in Wind Tunnel Testing Short Course was conducted Jan 8 and Jan 9, 2010. For more information, visit us
at https://info.aiaa.org/tac/ASG/GTTC/default.aspx and log-in as a member.
2009-2010 AIAA Ground Testing Outstanding Paper Award Winner
The AIAA Ground Test Committee Congratulates the Outstanding and Best Paper Award Winners for 2009 –
2010
The AIAA Ground Testing Technical Committee annually recognizes several papers from both the summer and winter
GTTC sponsored conferences. The GTTC hosts paper sessions in the winter at the AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting
and in the summer either at the Joint Propulsion Conference or Aerodynamics Measurement and Ground Testing
Conference. These “Outstanding Papers” are reviewed each spring to select one “Best Paper” for the entire year. The
recipient of the Best Paper Award is recognized during the AIAA awards luncheon held at the summer conference.
2009-2010 AIAA Ground Testing Outstanding Paper Award Winner
A Novel Technique for Reconstructing High- Frequency Transient Rocket Chamber Pressure Measurements
Stephen A. Whitmore, Matthew D. Wilson, Shannon D. Eilers,
Utah State University, Logan, UT, 84322-4130
45th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit
2 - 5 August 2009, Denver, Colorado
AIAA 2009-5288
Analysis of Sting Balance Calibration Data Using Optimized Regression Models
N. Ulbrich
Jacobs Technology Inc., Moffett Field, California 94035–1000
and
J. Bader
NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California 94035–1000
45th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit
2 - 5 August 2009, Denver, Colorado
AIAA 2009-5372
40th
AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference
Issue No 30 Summer 2010
http://www.aiaa.org/tc/gt/gttchome.html Page 13
Assessment of Response Surface Models Using Independent Confirmation Point Analysis
Richard DeLoach
NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia, 23681
48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition
4 - 7 January 2010, Orlando, Florida
AIAA 2010-741
Assessment of the NTF for natural laminar flow testing
Jeffrey D. Crouch, Mary I. Sutanto, David P. Witkowski
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Renton, WA, 98055
and
A. Neal Watkins, Melissa B. Rivers, Richard L. Campbell
NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, 23681
48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition
4 - 7 January 2010, Orlando, Florida
AIAA 2010-1302
Testing of a Model-Based Predictive Control System for a Transonic Aerodynamic Test Facility
J.M. Sheeley, S. Salita, B. Boylston, and M. Thelen
Aerospace Testing Alliance, AEDC Arnold AFB, TN 37389
and
M. Hamby
Jacobs Technology Arnold AFB, TN 37389
48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition
4 - 7 January 2010, Orlando, Florida
AIAA 2010-1309
Issue No 30 Summer 2010
http://www.aiaa.org/tc/gt/gttchome.html Page 14
Look for Our Posters!
These posters will be prominently displayed near most
Ground Test Technical Committee functions and technical sessions.
Issue No 30 Summer 2010
http://www.aiaa.org/tc/gt/gttchome.html Page 15
2010
Jan 4-7 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Orlando, FL
April 15 Nominations due to AIAA for Associate Fellow
April Congressional Visits Day
May Abstracts due for ASM 2011 Conference
May 15 Input due for AIAA GTTC Summer Newsletter
June 15 Nominations due to AIAA for Fellow
Jun 28-Jul 1 27th AIAA Aerodynamic Measurement and Ground Testing Conference, Chicago, IL
Aug 1 Input due for Aerospace America Highlight December Issue
Oct 1 Nominations due for AIAA Ground Testing Award
Nov 1 Nominations due to AIAA for TC Membership
Nov 1 Input due for AIAA GTTC Winter Newsletter
Dec 1 Aerospace America Highlights Issue
2011
Jan 4-7 49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace
Exposition, Orlando, FL
Aug 1-3 47th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, Dan Diego, CA
2012
Jan 9-12 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Nashville, TN
June 25-28 42nd AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, New Orleans, LA
Calendar of Events
Jennifer Allred NASA White Sands 575-524-5316 [email protected]
Wendell Baker Lockheed Martin Aeronautics 817-777-8781 [email protected]
Dale Belter Boeing 206-655-1632 [email protected]
Hudson Brower Northrup Grumman 310-332-5614 [email protected]
Guy Boyet ONERA +33-1-46-73-41-14 [email protected]
Victor Canacci Jacobs Sverdrup, GRC 216-433-6222 [email protected]
Ray Castner NASA Glenn Research Center 216-433-5657 [email protected]
Bradley Crawford NASA Langley Research Center
Steven Dunn NASA Langley Research Ctr, ROME Grp 757-864-1116 [email protected]
Daniel Ehrlich The Aerospace Corporation 310-336-9249 [email protected]
Amber Favaregh ViGYAN, Inc. 757-864-9397 [email protected]
Sivaram Gogineni Spectral Engeries 937-266-9570 [email protected]
Bob Guyton AFRL
Robert.Guyton2Wspafb.af.mil
Jeffrey Haas NASA Glenn Research Center 216-433-5718 [email protected]
Wayne Hawkins AEDC-XP 931-454-7211 [email protected]
Joan Hoopes Orbital Technologies 608-827-5000 [email protected]
Jerry Kegelman NASA Langley Research Center 757-864-1718 [email protected]
Ahmad Farid Khorrami California Institute of Technology 626-395-4795 [email protected]
Konstantinos Kontis The University of Manchester 44-161-3065751 [email protected]
Oliver Leembruggen Jacobs – WPAFB 937-255-2691 [email protected]
Mark Loomis NASA Ames 650-604-6578 [email protected]
Frank Lu UT - Arlington 817-272-2083 [email protected]
Stewart Lumb Boeing Huntington Beach 714-421-1724 [email protected]
Ed Marquart Raytheon Missile Systems 520-545-7879 [email protected]
Bryon Maynard NASA Stennis Space Center 228-688-2619 [email protected]
Scott Meyer Purdue University 765-496-1772 [email protected]
King Molder McKinley Climatic Lab, Eglin AFB 850-882-4383 [email protected]
Yasushi Nakata Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency 81-42-240-1436 [email protected]
Chuck Niskey Black Ram Engineering Services 757-325-7717 [email protected]
Joseph Norris AEDC White Oak 301-394-6430 [email protected]
Jonathan Osborne ATA 931-454-3130 [email protected]
Joe Patrick Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Co. 770-494-4158 [email protected]
Iwan Philipsen German Dutch Wind Tunnels (DNW) +31-527-248531 [email protected]
Ray Rhew NASA Langley 757-864-4705 [email protected]
Dieter Schimanski ETW +49-2203-609154 [email protected]
Masashi Shigemi Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency 81-422-40-3255 [email protected]
Tony Skaff Sierra Lobo, Inc. 419-499-9653 X 103 [email protected]
David Smith Aerospace Testing Alliance (ATA) 931-454-6750 [email protected]
Justin Smith Sandia National Laboratories 505-845-1134 [email protected]
Sheri Smith-Brito Boeing 206-769-4473 [email protected]
Johannes Van Aken Jacobs Technology, Inc. 650-604-6668 [email protected]
David Van Every Aiolos 416-674-3017 x248 [email protected]
Doyle Veazey ATA 931-454-6704 [email protected]
Thomas Wayman Gulfstream Aerospace 912-965-6787 [email protected]
Julien Weiss Bombardier Aerospace 514-855-5001 X 51580 [email protected]
Eugene Richard White ViGYAN, Inc. 757-865-1400 x202 [email protected]
Curtis Wilson Picatinny Arsenal 908-459-4611 [email protected]
David Wishart Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne Space Propulsion 561-796-8438 [email protected]
Michael Wrenn ATA 931-454-7261 [email protected]
AIAA Ground Test Technical Committee Membership
GTTC Officers
Chair: Joe Patrick Vice Chair: Ray Castner Secretary: Steve Dunn
Sierra Lobo, Inc. 11401 Hoover Road Milan, Ohio 44846
419-499-WOLF (9653) 419-499-7700 fax www.sierralobo.com
We will be known by the tracks we leave . . . Dakota Proverb
Sierra Lobo is ISO 9001:2008 and AS9100 Certified. “A Provider of Engineering and Technical Services, including Hardware Fabrication and
Testing, to the Aerospace and Transportation Industries.”
Government Testing Services
Sierra Lobo, Inc. is pleased to be the Corporate Sponsor for the AIAA's Ground Test Technical Committee Newsletter.
Sierra Lobo has the most efficient pulse tube cryocooler in the world for liquid hydrogen/liquid oxygen densification, liquefaction, and no-vent solutions for advanced transportation systems. The DPMS significantly improves vehicle performance, responsiveness, reliability, and eliminates costly boil-off in ground storage dewars.
Densified Propellant Management SystemTM (DPMS)
Cryocooler
TASHE
Cryo-Tracker® Liquid Level & Temperature Sensors
The patented Sierra Lobo Cryo-Tracker
® System provides
laboratory quality cryogenic fluid temperature, level, and fluid mass data inside vehicles and ground support equipment in a rugged flight-weight package.
Technology Development
We are an industry leader in the development of cryogenic propellant management system technologies
applicable in NASA, DoD, and commercial applications.
Engineering Services Analysis, Design and Fabrication of Fluid Management Systems Pressure & temperature conditioning systems for cryogenic propellants/hydrocarbon fuels
Vacuum to high-pressure test equipment for both research and production
Propulsion system test stands
SLI Provides Custom, turn-key systems to meet customer requirements
On-site test support and analysis of potential system upgrades
NASA, U.S. Air Force, U.S. Navy, U.S. Army, Missile Defense Agency, DARPA
Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Jacobs Engineering, EG&G
We Proudly Serve These Government Customers:
Joint strike fighter model in the
8x6 foot supersonic wind tunnel at
NASA GRC
Impact testing – NASA
ARC vertical gun range
Castor solid rocket
propulsion testing
RL10 cryogenic upper
stage engine
demonstrative testing
hot fire test