grandview elementary

43
GRANDVIEW ELEMENTARY CIAC February 9, 2012

Upload: flann

Post on 07-Feb-2016

37 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Grandview Elementary. CIAC February 9, 2012. Reading. 2011 Target 87.8% 2012 Target 91.9%. Grandview Elementary Reading % of Students Meeting Standard. Not Reported on AYP. 30 students. 42 students. 35 students. 37 students. 10 students. 12 students. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

GRANDVIEW ELEMENTARY

CIACFebruary 9, 2012

READING

GRANDVIEW ELEMENTARY READING

% OF STUDENTS MEETING STANDARD

All Low SES SPED ELL African American

Hispanic White Multi Ethnic

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

10090

86.5

75

100

83.390

93.787.5

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

2011 Target 87.8%2012 Target 91.9%

2007 2008 2009 2010 20110

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100100

83.3 85.7 86.5

Low SES

Not

Rep

ort

ed

on

AY

P

30 s

tud

en

ts

42 s

tud

en

ts

35 s

tud

en

ts

37 s

tud

en

ts

2007 2008 2009 2010 20110

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

10090

100

73.3

60

75

SPED

7 s

tud

en

ts

10 s

tud

en

ts

15 s

tud

en

ts

10 s

tud

en

ts

12 s

tud

en

ts

2007 2008 2009 2010 20110

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100100 100 100 100 100

ELL

5 s

tud

en

ts

5 s

tud

en

ts

9 s

tud

en

ts

4 s

tud

en

ts

2 s

tud

en

ts

2007 2008 2009 2010 20110

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0

100

70

100

83.3

African American

Column1

7 s

tud

en

ts

10 s

tud

en

ts

6 s

tud

en

ts

6 s

tud

en

ts

1 s

tud

en

t

2007 2008 2009 2010 20110

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100100 100 100

84.690

Hispanic

Series 1

3 s

tud

en

ts

4 s

tud

en

ts

13 s

tud

en

ts

20 s

tud

en

ts

1 s

tud

en

t

2007 2008 2009 2010 20110

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100 96.1100

94.788.2

93.7

White

14 s

tud

en

ts

16 s

tud

en

ts

19 s

tud

en

ts

17 s

tud

en

ts

26 s

tud

en

ts

2007 2008 2009 2010 20110

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100100

93.3

76.2

83.387.5

Multi-Ethnic

15 s

tud

en

ts

8 s

tud

en

ts

21 s

tud

en

ts

6 s

tud

en

ts

16

stu

den

ts

LONGITUDINAL DATA

2009 3rd Graders 2010 4th Graders 2011 5th Graders0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

6 6 6

4

5

4

2

1

2

Total # of Students # of Students Meeting Standard# of Students Below Standard

2009 3rd Graders 2010 4th Graders 2011 5th Graders

Shai'Anne 3 approaching Shai'Anne 4 meets Shai'Anne 5 approaching

Andrew 3 exceeds Andrew 4 exceeds Andrew 5 meets

Carmela 3 warning Carmela 4 approaching Carmela 5 approaching

Ashley 3 exemplary Ashley 4 exemplary Ashley 5 exemplary

Charles 3 exceeds Charles 4 exceeds Charles 5 exemplary

DeJohnpaulhezues 3 exceeds DeJohnpaulhezues 4 meets DeJohnpaulhezues 5 meets

Longitudinal DataReading

= increase in performance category

=decrease in performance category

# OF STUDENTS IN TEST CATEGORIES

Academic Warning Approaches Standard

Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Exemplary0

5

10

15

20

25

3

9

23

19

9

0

5

1817

9

1

4

14

19

17

2009 2010 2011

MULTIPLE MEASURES DATA

Spreadsheet for reading mastery

SAMPLE CLASS DEMOGRAPHICS

4

12

Gender

MaleFemale

8

3

5

EthnicityWhite

His-panic

Multi-racial

Enrolled0

2

4

6

8

6

2

7

1

K123

SES0

2

4

6

8

10

9

4 3

FreeRe-ducedFull

DISAGGREGATED DATA BY INDICATOR

Student NameRhym

e

Reco

gnit

ion

Rhym

e

Prod

ucti

on

Sylla

ble

s

Ini

tial

Sou

nd

End

ing

Sou

nd

Sou

nd

Ble

ndin

g

Lett

er

Sou

nds

# o

f so

unds

indent

ified

Wri

tes

Sou

nds

# o

f so

unds

wri

tten

Sto

ry

Com

p.

Tot

al

Perc

ent

age

Grade Card Score 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 36

Manuel Olea 1 1 3 2 3 1 2 20 4 26 1 18 50%

Angelina Rivera 3 1 3 4 4 4 3 25 2 24 3 27 75%

Daniel Lagos 3 2 3 4 3 3 3 25 3 25 3 27 75%

Mechele Stringer 3 4 4 4 1 1 3 25 3 25 4 27 75%

Pablo Gaytan 2 1 4 4 3 4 4 26 4 26 2 28 78%

Giovani Ortega 3 4 4 4 3 2 2 23 2 24 4 28 78%

Leon Leadabrand 4 3 4 4 2 4 1 18 2 20 4 28 78%

Kaeden Kleikamp 2 3 4 4 4 4 3 25 3 25 2 29 81%

Zachary Peirano 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 26 2 24 1 31 86%

J 'Mere Hatcher 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 26 2 23 3 31 86%

Michael Luna 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 26 4 31 86%

Haylee Sites 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 19 2 23 4 31 86%

Honesty Perkins 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 26 3 25 1 32 89%

Tyler Sturgeon 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 25 4 26 3 33 92%

Ryan Noles 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 26 4 26 2 34 94%

Anthony Smith 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 26 3 25 3 34 94%

Brooklin Burris 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 26 2 24 4 34 94%

Xavier Carpenter 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 26 2 24 4 34 94%

Braylon Garnett 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 26 4 26 3 34 94%

J adelynn Gavin 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 26 4 26 2 34 94%

J asmine J ackson 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 26 4 26 2 34 94%

Charlotte Musil 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 26 4 26 4 35 97%

Hannah Strauss 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 26 3 24 4 35 97%

I an Quigley 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 26 4 26 4 36 100%

Parker Collins 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 26 4 26 4 36 100% 0-57%

Harley Herbert 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 26 4 26 4 36 100% 58-69%

Kyleigh Hoff man 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 26 4 26 4 36 100% 70-84%

Marie Whittaker 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 26 4 26 4 36 100% 85-92%

Average 3.6 3.5 3.9 3.9 3.4 24.9 3.2 25.0 32 88% 93-100%Exemplary

Quarter 2 Reading Checklist 2011- 2012

Academic Warning

Approaches Standard

Meets Standard

Exceeds Standard

FORMATIVE DATA

Baseline 1 2 Change 3 change 4 Change Baseline 1 2 Change 3 Change 4 Change Baseline 1 2 3 4

Ariyana 79 86 82 -4 76 73 93 20 0.775 79.7 88%

J avon 79 100 91 -9 47 93 40 -53 0.63 97 66%

Marques 58 57 36 -21 41 60 53 -7 0.495 58.5 45%

Abigail 65 86 82 -4 47 87 87 0 0.56 86.3 85%

Abigayle 58 93 91 -2 76 100 87 -13 0.67 97 89%

Allana 63 86 91 5 71 87 80 -7 0.67 86 86%

J anessa 63 71 -71 65 73 -73 0.64 72 0%

Elizabeth 79 86 91 5 65 87 60 -27 0.72 86 76%

Auriana 90 100 91 -9 77 100 87 -13 0.835 100 89%

J acqueline 21 71 73 2 47 60 93 33 0.34 66 83%

Lily 63 79 100 21 53 80 73 -7 0.58 80 87%

Donelle 58 86 64 -22 82 93 53 -40 0.7 88 59%

Logan 84 93 91 -2 76 87 87 0 0.8 90 89%

Robby 53 64 64 0 53 73 53 -20 0.53 69 59%

Connie 79 71 91 20 71 87 87 0 0.75 79 89%

Unique 89 86 91 5 82 73 93 20 0.855 80 92%

Taeghan 84 86 82 -4 94 80 87 7 0.89 83 85%

Amanda 45 45 60 47 -13 66 46%68.529 82.4 81.94 -3 #### ###### #### #DIV/0! 66.0588 80.7 75.8 -16 #### ###### #### ###### 0.6729 77.1 79% #### #DIV/0!

Expository Narrative Overall Score

STANDARD FORMATIVE DATA

Baseline First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth QuarterR.3.1.3.2 Context clues 80 86 903.1.3.5 Word Structure 60 81 793.1.4.2 Text Features 79 67 823.1.4.5 Infer/DC 67 78 593.1.4.8 Compare/Contrast 65 70 763.1.4.9 Cause and Effect 63 83 803.1.4.10 Retell 60 39 383.1.4.11 Main Idea 72 94 793.2.1.1 Character 94 89 853.2.1.2 Plot 46 97 91

MATHEMATICS

GRANDVIEW ELEMENTARY MATH% OF STUDENTS MEETING STANDARD

ENROLLED BY 9/20

0102030405060708090

100 94 91.983.3

100 100 10093.8

75

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

2010 Target 86.7%2011 Target 91.9%

2007 2008 2009 2010 20110

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Low SES

Series 1

30 s

tud

en

ts

39 s

tud

en

ts

Not

Rep

ort

ed

on

AY

P

35 s

tud

en

ts

37 s

tud

en

ts

2007 2008 2009 2010 20110

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

80

100

78.6

9083.3

SPED

Series 1

10 s

tud

en

ts

7 s

tud

en

ts

15 s

tud

en

ts

10 s

tud

en

ts

12 s

tud

en

ts

2007 2008 2009 2010 20110

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100100 100 100 100 100

ELL

2 s

tud

en

ts

5 s

tud

en

ts

5 s

tud

en

ts

9 s

tud

en

ts

4 s

tud

en

ts

2007 2008 2009 2010 20110

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100100 100

90

100 100African American

1 s

tud

en

t

7 s

tud

en

ts

10 s

tud

en

ts

6 s

tud

en

ts

6 s

tud

en

ts

2007 2008 2009 2010 20110

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100100 100 100

84.6

100Hispanic

1 s

tud

en

t

3 s

tud

en

ts

4 s

tud

en

ts

13 s

tud

en

ts

20 s

tud

en

ts

2007 2008 2009 2010 20110

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

88.592.9

82.4

10093.8

White

26 s

tud

en

ts

14 s

tud

en

ts

17 s

tud

en

ts

17 s

tud

en

ts

16 s

tud

en

ts

2007 2008 2009 2010 20110

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100100 100

89.5

100

75

Multi-Ethnic

16 s

tud

en

ts

15 s

tud

en

ts

19 s

tud

en

ts

6 s

tud

en

ts

8 s

tud

en

ts

2009 3rd Graders 2010 4th Graders 2011 5th Graders

Shai'Anne 3 meets Shai'Anne 4 approaching Shai'Anne 5 meets

Andrew 3 exceeds Andrew 4 meets Andrew 5 exceeds

Carmela 3 approaching Carmela 4 approaching Carmela 5 exceeds

Ashley 3 exemplary Ashley 4 exemplary Ashley 5 exemplary

Charles 3 meets Charles 4 exceeds Charles 5 meets

DeJohnpaulhezues 3 exceeds DeJohnpaulhezues 4 exceeds DeJohnpaulhezues 5 exceeds

= increase in performance category

=decrease in performance category

PERFORMANCE OVER TIME

2009 3rd Graders 2010 4th Graders 2011 5th Graders0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

6 6 6

5

4

6

1

2

0

Longitudinal Data

Total # of Students # of Student Meeting Standard# of Students Below Standard

Academic Warning

Approaches Standard

Meets Standard

Exceeds Standard

Exemplary0

5

10

15

20

25

3

5

23

17

11

0

3

10

19

17

0

3

14

17

21

# of Students in Test Categories

2009 2010 2011

DISAGGREGATED DATA BY INDICATORTTVULG9949Math Second Quarter Post

Indicator: M.3.3.2.K2-Tim

e digital

to m

inute

M.3.3.2.A1b

-Mea

suremen

t esti

mation to

cm (p

aper)

M.3.3.2.A1b

-Estimati

on Baseb

all bat

M.3.3.1.K4-S

hape att

ribute

M.3.3.1.K4-S

hape id

-hexago

n

M.3.3.1.K4-Shap

e id -r

hombus

M.3.3.1.K4-S

hape id

from pic

M.3.2.3.K3-Number

pattern

M.3.2.3.K3-Number

Pattern

M.3.2.3.K3-N

umber pa

ttern-add

M.3.2.3.K3-Number

pattern

sub.

M.3.1.4.K7-F

act family

-arra

y

M.3.1.4.K7-Fact

family-ar

ray

M.3.1.4.A1b-M

oney-m

aking ch

ange

M.3.1.4.A1b

-Money

-adding i

n word prob.

M.3.1.4.A1b-M

oney-ad

ding word

prob.

M.3.1.4.A1b

-Money

-subtra

ct word prob

.

M.3.1.4.A1a-Compu

tation-3

digit a

dd (mist

ake)

M.3.1.4.A1a-A

dd base 10 i

n word

prob

M.3.1.4.A1a-Compu

tation 4

digit a

dd word prob.

M.3.1.4.A1a

-Computati

on-add 3

digit in

word

prob.(m

istak

e)

M.3.1.1.K3b-M

ult. Arra

y model

M.3.1.1.K3b

-Comp.-multiply

(not e

qual rep.)

M.3.1.1.K3b-Comp.-m

ultiply (eq

ual to)

M.3.3.2.K2-Multi

ply arra

y

M.3.3.2.K2-Tim

e digital

-word

s

score

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26javon 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 B 1 1 B 1 1 1 1 1 B 1 1 1 1 1 88.46%marques A 1 D B 1 D C 1 1 1 1 1 1 B B 1 D B 1 1 B 1 A D 1 C 50.00%abigail 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 B 1 1 D 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 C 88.46%abigayle 1 1 1 1 1 D C 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 C 1 1 A 1 1 1 1 1 1 84.62%allana 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 A 1 1 B 1 1 1 1 1 1 D 1 1 1 A 1 1 1 84.62%elizabeth 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 100.00%auriana 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 100.00% jacqueline B A 1 B 1 1 1 C 1 1 C A 1 A 1 1 C 1 B C 1 1 A 1 D 1 53.85%lily 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 B 1 1 1 1 A 92.31%unique 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 D 1 A 1 B 1 1 1 1 1 88.46%ariyana 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 A 1 1 A 1 1 B 1 1 C B 1 B 1 1 1 1 C 73.08%donelle A A A A 1 1 D 1 1 1 1 A A 1 B A 1 D 1 1 B 1 1 1 1 1 57.69%amanda B 1 1 C 1 1 1 C B D 1 B 1 A 1 1 C D A 1 B 1 C C B C 42.31%logan 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 A 1 1 C 1 1 1 B 1 1 1 1 1 88.46%robby A A D C 1 1 1 1 1 1 D D 1 B 1 1 D 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 A 65.38%connie 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 C 1 1 1 96.15%taeghan 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 C 1 B 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 92.31%score 71% 82% 82% 71% 100% 88% 82% 88% 82% 94% 88% 59% 94% 65% 76% 88% 53% 71% 71% 88% 53% 100% 71% 88% 88% 65% 79.19%

AW 3 18%As 2 12%MS 1 6%ES 8 47%EX 3 18%

17

INDIVIDUAL INDICATOR BREAKDOWN

22 23 24 25 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 12 13javon 1 1 1 1 100% javon 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 75% javon 0 1 50%marques 1 0 0 1 50% marques 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 38% marques 1 1 100%abiga i l 1 1 1 1 100% abiga i l 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 75% abiga i l 1 1 100%abigayle 1 1 1 1 100% abigayle 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 75% abigayle 1 1 100%al lana 1 0 1 1 75% al lana 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 88% al lana 0 1 50%el izabeth 1 1 1 1 100% el izabeth 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 100% el izabeth 1 1 100%auriana 1 1 1 1 100% auriana 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 100% auriana 1 1 100% jacquel ine 1 0 1 0 50% jacquel ine 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 50% jacquel ine 0 1 50%l i ly 1 1 1 1 100% l i ly 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 88% l i ly 1 1 100%unique 1 1 1 1 100% unique 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 63% unique 1 1 100%ariyana 1 1 1 1 100% ariyana 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 50% ariyana 0 1 50%donel le 1 1 1 1 100% donel le 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 50% donel le 0 0 0%amanda 1 0 0 0 25% amanda 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 38% amanda 0 1 50%logan 1 1 1 1 100% logan 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 63% logan 1 1 100%robby 1 1 1 1 100% robby 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 75% robby 0 1 50%connie 1 0 1 1 75% connie 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 100% connie 1 1 100%taeghan 1 1 1 1 100% taeghan 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 75% taeghan 1 1 100%score 100% 71% 88% 88% 87% score 65% 76% 88% 53% 71% 71% 88% 53% 71% score 59% 94% 77%

8 9 10 11 4 5 6 7 paper bat 1 26javon 1 1 1 1 100% javon 1 1 1 1 100% javon 1 1 100% javon 1 1 100%marques 1 1 1 1 100% marques 0 1 0 0 25% marques 1 0 50% marques 0 0 0%abiga i l 1 1 1 1 100% abiga i l 1 1 1 1 100% abiga i l 1 1 100% abiga i l 1 0 50%abigayle 1 1 1 1 100% abigayle 1 1 0 0 50% abigayle 1 1 100% abigayle 1 1 100%al lana 1 0 1 1 75% al lana 1 1 1 1 100% al lana 1 1 100% al lana 1 1 100%el izabeth 1 1 1 1 100% el izabeth 1 1 1 1 100% el izabeth 1 1 100% el izabeth 1 1 100%auriana 1 1 1 1 100% auriana 1 1 1 1 100% auriana 1 1 100% auriana 1 1 100% jacquel ine 0 1 1 0 50% jacquel ine 0 1 1 1 75% jacquel ine 0 1 50% jacquel ine 0 1 50%l i ly 1 1 1 1 100% l i ly 1 1 1 1 100% l i ly 1 1 100% l i ly 1 0 50%unique 1 1 1 1 100% unique 1 1 1 1 100% unique 1 1 100% unique 1 1 100%ariyana 1 0 1 1 75% ariyana 1 1 1 1 100% ariyana 1 1 100% ariyana 1 0 50%donel le 1 1 1 1 100% donel le 0 1 1 0 50% donel le 0 0 0% donel le 0 1 50%amanda 0 0 0 1 25% amanda 0 1 1 1 75% amanda 1 1 100% amanda 0 0 0%logan 1 1 1 1 100% logan 1 1 1 1 100% logan 1 1 100% logan 1 1 100%robby 1 1 1 0 75% robby 0 1 1 1 75% robby 0 0 0% robby 0 0 0%connie 1 1 1 1 100% connie 1 1 1 1 100% connie 1 1 100% connie 1 1 100%taeghan 1 1 1 1 100% taeghan 1 1 1 1 100% taeghan 1 1 100% taeghan 1 1 100%score 88% 82% 94% 88% 88% score 71% 100% 88% 82% 85% score 82% 82% 82% score 71% 65% 68%

M.3.1.4.K7-Fact family -array

M.3.2.3.K3-Number pattern M.3.3.1.K4-Shape attribute

M.3.1.1.K3b-Mult. Array model M.3.1.4.A1b-Money-making change

M.3.3.2.A1b-Measurement estimation to cm M.3.3.2.K2-Time digital to minute

STUDENT SUCCESS PLAN

Strategies to implement for student success

WAYS TO IMPROVE STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT

I will continue to do morning school and Book Chat. I will also address these needs during MTSS.

Provide Tutor time and Smartboard lessons with Ms. Mackey.

Use BAIP lessons to provide additional instruction on specific indicators.

Use comprehension passages to work on specific indicators such as retell and drawing conclusions.

Individual Whole Class

CURRENT PLANS IN PLACE Homework Lunch Bunch

Students who did not complete their homework or need extra practice are given the opportunity to work during lunch.

Before and After School Tutoring by Certified Staff

Title One classified tutoring during the school day

Book Clubs Cooperative Learning MTSS

Certified teachers working with neediest Support staff facilitating peer tutoring to increase

both reading and math fluency

USE OF STAFF

100% of classroom teachers and ESS teacher tutoring

Title One funding for classified tutors 1 full-time 3-5 tutor 1 part-time k-2 tutor

Exceptional Student Service Staff facilitating peer modeling

Part-Time Librarian teaching a reading group Certified Classroom Aide teaching a reading

group TA used for academic reinforcement/enrichment Academic coach and teachers conducting book

clubs

SCHEDULING

Before school tutoring- 7:30-8:15 MTSS- 12:00-12:30 Book Clubs-before/after school or during lunch

(by student choice) After school tutoring- 3:30-4:15 Title One tutoring- 7:45-4:15

throughout the day scheduled by academic coach in response to the data and teacher input

Focus Meetings during common plan time when allowed by scheduling

Schedules built around sharing staff Music/PE with 2 other buildings Librarian with 1 other building

FORMS:COMMUNICATION AND DATA COLLECTION

FORMS USED

District SIT Paperwork- All Students Data Collection Sheet (Form..) Student Profile Record (Form..)

Formative Data Record Sheet Students use this form to track their growth and

progress Differentiation Instruction Form

Teachers use this form to track students performance on each indicator

Tutor Form (Also used for MTSS) Goal Setting Forms- All Students

See sample forms

TUTOR FORM

GOAL SETTING FORM

My Goals For the Quarter

By: _____________________________________________

Reading Goal:

I will be able to ______________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________.

Actions to Complete the Goal:

1.___________________________________________________________________________________.

2.___________________________________________________________________________________.

My Current Scores:

Lexile:______ IRL:___________ N. Formative:________ E. Formative:_________

SFA Comprehension Score:____________ SFA Vocabulary:________ WPM:_________

Math Goal:

I will be able to ________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________.

Actions to Complete the Goal:

1.___________________________________________________________________________________.

2.___________________________________________________________________________________.

Current Formative Score:___________________(2nd Q.)

Pre-Test Score:______________________

Additional Goal:

FORMATIVE DATA RECORD SHEET

Date #

Date Score Change

Date Text Type Score

Date Text Type Score

WPM

Assessment Score Card

Reading Comprehensive

SRIUsername:Password:

Name

Username:Password:

Reading Formative

Date

Taught Indicator

Score Overall Score

Date Overall Score

Date Overall ScoreMath Comprehensive

Math Interim

Math Formative

Front Page Second Page

DIFFERENTIATION INFORMATION FORM

Standard – Benchmark -Indicator

Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Below Standard