gradient spoiling - web.stanford.edu · section c2 b.hargreaves - rad 229 gradient spoiling...

38
B.Hargreaves - RAD 229 Section C2 Gradient Spoiling • Average balanced SSFP magnetization • Reduce sensitivity to off-resonance FFE, FISP, GRASS, GRE, FAST, Field Echo 1

Upload: others

Post on 27-Jul-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Gradient Spoiling - web.stanford.edu · Section C2 B.Hargreaves - RAD 229 Gradient Spoiling •Average balanced SSFP magnetization •Reduce sensitivity to off-resonance FFE, FISP,

B.Hargreaves - RAD 229Section C2

Gradient Spoiling

• Average balanced SSFP magnetization

• Reduce sensitivity to off-resonance

FFE, FISP, GRASS, GRE, FAST, Field Echo

1

Page 2: Gradient Spoiling - web.stanford.edu · Section C2 B.Hargreaves - RAD 229 Gradient Spoiling •Average balanced SSFP magnetization •Reduce sensitivity to off-resonance FFE, FISP,

B.Hargreaves - RAD 229Section C2

Gradient-Spoiled Sequence (GRE, FFE, FISP, GRASS)

RF

Gz

Gy

Gx

Signal

TR

2

Page 3: Gradient Spoiling - web.stanford.edu · Section C2 B.Hargreaves - RAD 229 Gradient Spoiling •Average balanced SSFP magnetization •Reduce sensitivity to off-resonance FFE, FISP,

B.Hargreaves - RAD 229Section C2

Gradient Spoiling

RF

Gz

TR

Signal is NOT eliminated at the end of TR!3

Page 4: Gradient Spoiling - web.stanford.edu · Section C2 B.Hargreaves - RAD 229 Gradient Spoiling •Average balanced SSFP magnetization •Reduce sensitivity to off-resonance FFE, FISP,

B.Hargreaves - RAD 229Section C2

Gradient Spoiling

Precession across a voxel dominated by spoiler:

• Each spin has a different precession

• Average of balanced SSFP

RF

Gz

Signal

TR

4

Page 5: Gradient Spoiling - web.stanford.edu · Section C2 B.Hargreaves - RAD 229 Gradient Spoiling •Average balanced SSFP magnetization •Reduce sensitivity to off-resonance FFE, FISP,

B.Hargreaves - RAD 229Section C2

Mag

nitu

de

x

ySpin Distribution

Signal vs Balanced SSFP

Gradient Spoiled Signal

• Lower signal than balanced SSFP

• Flat signal vs. frequency profile

• No dark band artifacts!

Frequency

5

Page 6: Gradient Spoiling - web.stanford.edu · Section C2 B.Hargreaves - RAD 229 Gradient Spoiling •Average balanced SSFP magnetization •Reduce sensitivity to off-resonance FFE, FISP,

B.Hargreaves - RAD 229Section C2

Gradient Spoiled vs Balanced SSFP

(Courtesy of Suba Srinivasan, Stanford)

Gradient-SpoiledBalanced SSFP

6

Page 7: Gradient Spoiling - web.stanford.edu · Section C2 B.Hargreaves - RAD 229 Gradient Spoiling •Average balanced SSFP magnetization •Reduce sensitivity to off-resonance FFE, FISP,

B.Hargreaves - RAD 229Section C2

Reversed Gradient Spoiling

RF

Gz

TR

Spoiler Gradient

Same as gradient-spoiling, but

• Precession before imaging

(SSFP Signal at t=TR)

• Some T2 contrast

Image Acquisition

Pre-RF7

Page 8: Gradient Spoiling - web.stanford.edu · Section C2 B.Hargreaves - RAD 229 Gradient Spoiling •Average balanced SSFP magnetization •Reduce sensitivity to off-resonance FFE, FISP,

B.Hargreaves - RAD 229Section C2

Mag

nitu

deP

hase

πx

ySpin Distribution Signal vs Balanced SSFP

Reversed Gradient Spoiled Signal

• Almost identical signal to gradient-spoiled imaging

• Flat signal vs. frequency profile

8

Page 9: Gradient Spoiling - web.stanford.edu · Section C2 B.Hargreaves - RAD 229 Gradient Spoiling •Average balanced SSFP magnetization •Reduce sensitivity to off-resonance FFE, FISP,

B.Hargreaves - RAD 229Section C2

Double Echo Imaging: DESS/FADE

RF

Gz

Signal

TR

a b

c d

a b

c d

a b

c d

a b

c dEcho 1 Echo 2 Average Difference

9

Page 10: Gradient Spoiling - web.stanford.edu · Section C2 B.Hargreaves - RAD 229 Gradient Spoiling •Average balanced SSFP magnetization •Reduce sensitivity to off-resonance FFE, FISP,

B.Hargreaves - RAD 229Section C2

Gradient-Spoiler Question

• What if we split the spoiler into two and sample mid-way between?

• No signal!

• Averaging the “TE=TR/2” bSSFP state -- sign flip with every band

• GRE and reversed GRE average bSSFP states just after and just before the RF pulses

10

RF

Gz

TR

Page 11: Gradient Spoiling - web.stanford.edu · Section C2 B.Hargreaves - RAD 229 Gradient Spoiling •Average balanced SSFP magnetization •Reduce sensitivity to off-resonance FFE, FISP,

B.Hargreaves - RAD 229Section C2

Gradient-Spoiler Question (cont)

11

Pha

se

π

Frequency

Pha

se

π

Mag

nitu

deP

hase

π

xy

x

y

x

y

Post-RF

Pre-RF

Center

Flipped!

Recall bSSFP Dynamics...Gradient-Spoiled

Distribution

Reverse Gradient-Spoiled Distribution

This Example

Page 12: Gradient Spoiling - web.stanford.edu · Section C2 B.Hargreaves - RAD 229 Gradient Spoiling •Average balanced SSFP magnetization •Reduce sensitivity to off-resonance FFE, FISP,

B.Hargreaves - RAD 229Section C2

Summary: Gradient Spoiling

• Average balanced SSFP magnetization

• Reduce sensitivity to off-resonance

• Unbalanced gradients - more motion sensitivity

FFE, FISP, GRASS, GRE, FAST, Field Echo, T2-FFE, PSIF, CE-FAST

FADE, DESS 12

Page 13: Gradient Spoiling - web.stanford.edu · Section C2 B.Hargreaves - RAD 229 Gradient Spoiling •Average balanced SSFP magnetization •Reduce sensitivity to off-resonance FFE, FISP,

B.Hargreaves - RAD 229Section C2

RF Spoiled Imaging

• Goal: Pure T1 contrast with short TR

• Fast, 3D T1-weighted imaging

• Need to “zero” Mxy at end of TR

Frahm 1987, Zur 1991

SPGR, FLASH, T1-FFE, RF-spoiled FAST

13

Page 14: Gradient Spoiling - web.stanford.edu · Section C2 B.Hargreaves - RAD 229 Gradient Spoiling •Average balanced SSFP magnetization •Reduce sensitivity to off-resonance FFE, FISP,

B.Hargreaves - RAD 229Section C2

RF-Spoiled Gradient Echo

RF

Gz

TR (Quadratic Phase Increment)S

igna

l

1

0

Mz

X XEliminate transverse magnetization: T1 contrast

14

Page 15: Gradient Spoiling - web.stanford.edu · Section C2 B.Hargreaves - RAD 229 Gradient Spoiling •Average balanced SSFP magnetization •Reduce sensitivity to off-resonance FFE, FISP,

B.Hargreaves - RAD 229Section C2

Quadratic Phase RF

• RF axis of rotation, not flip angle!

• RF phase is “randomized”

Mx

My

Mx

My

Mz

15

Page 16: Gradient Spoiling - web.stanford.edu · Section C2 B.Hargreaves - RAD 229 Gradient Spoiling •Average balanced SSFP magnetization •Reduce sensitivity to off-resonance FFE, FISP,

B.Hargreaves - RAD 229Section C2

RF Spoiling

• Goal: Eliminate transverse magnetization

• Quadratic phase increment with gradient spoiling:

φk = (0.5)117° k2

• Shifting, spoiled profile

• Transverse magnetization “cancels”

• T1 contrast

Frahm 1987, Zur 1991

16

Page 17: Gradient Spoiling - web.stanford.edu · Section C2 B.Hargreaves - RAD 229 Gradient Spoiling •Average balanced SSFP magnetization •Reduce sensitivity to off-resonance FFE, FISP,

B.Hargreaves - RAD 229Section C2

0 50 100 150 2000

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

Excitation

Mag

nitu

de

0 50 100 150 200−1

0

1

2

3

Excitation

Phas

e (ra

d)

SPGR Signal Evolution (Bloch)

1 Pixel

Average (gradient-smoothed)

Excitation # Excitation #

Magnitude Phase

17

Page 18: Gradient Spoiling - web.stanford.edu · Section C2 B.Hargreaves - RAD 229 Gradient Spoiling •Average balanced SSFP magnetization •Reduce sensitivity to off-resonance FFE, FISP,

B.Hargreaves - RAD 229Section C2

RF Spoiled Signal

Repetition Number

Repetition Number0 200

0 200

Mag

nitu

deP

hase

π

−π

Signal with residual transverse magnetization perfectly zero

18

Page 19: Gradient Spoiling - web.stanford.edu · Section C2 B.Hargreaves - RAD 229 Gradient Spoiling •Average balanced SSFP magnetization •Reduce sensitivity to off-resonance FFE, FISP,

B.Hargreaves - RAD 229Section C2

RF-Spoiled Gradient Echo

19

Page 20: Gradient Spoiling - web.stanford.edu · Section C2 B.Hargreaves - RAD 229 Gradient Spoiling •Average balanced SSFP magnetization •Reduce sensitivity to off-resonance FFE, FISP,

B.Hargreaves - RAD 229Section C2

RF-Spoiled Contrast-Enhanced MRPre-Contrast SPGR Post-Contrast SPGR

20

Courtesy Lewis Shin

Page 21: Gradient Spoiling - web.stanford.edu · Section C2 B.Hargreaves - RAD 229 Gradient Spoiling •Average balanced SSFP magnetization •Reduce sensitivity to off-resonance FFE, FISP,

B.Hargreaves - RAD 229Section C2

RF Spoiling: Summary

• Gradient spoiling + Quadratic phase RF

• “Eliminates” transverse magnetization

• Lower signal than GRE or balanced SSFP

• Pure T1 contrast

21

Page 22: Gradient Spoiling - web.stanford.edu · Section C2 B.Hargreaves - RAD 229 Gradient Spoiling •Average balanced SSFP magnetization •Reduce sensitivity to off-resonance FFE, FISP,

B.Hargreaves - RAD 229Section C2

Gradient Echo Sequence Comparison

Sequence

Spoiling

Transverse Magnetization

Contrast

SNR

RF-Spoiled

RF + Gradient

Cancelled

T1

Lower

Gradient Spoiled

Gradient

Averaged

T2/T1

Moderate

Balanced SSFP

None

Retained

T2/T1

High (but Banding)

22

Page 23: Gradient Spoiling - web.stanford.edu · Section C2 B.Hargreaves - RAD 229 Gradient Spoiling •Average balanced SSFP magnetization •Reduce sensitivity to off-resonance FFE, FISP,

B.Hargreaves - RAD 229Section C2

Just for Fun… Putting it Together!

23

Gradient- Spoiled

Constant RF Phase Increment

Quadratic Phase (Increasing Phase

Increment)

Average Signal Perfect Spoiling

117º

119º

Page 24: Gradient Spoiling - web.stanford.edu · Section C2 B.Hargreaves - RAD 229 Gradient Spoiling •Average balanced SSFP magnetization •Reduce sensitivity to off-resonance FFE, FISP,

B.Hargreaves - RAD 229Section C2

Image Comparison

• Same TR, TE, flip angle

• Differences: Signal, Contrast, Dark-Bands

Balanced SSFP Gradient Spoiled RF Spoiled

24

Page 25: Gradient Spoiling - web.stanford.edu · Section C2 B.Hargreaves - RAD 229 Gradient Spoiling •Average balanced SSFP magnetization •Reduce sensitivity to off-resonance FFE, FISP,

B.Hargreaves - RAD 229Section C2

Your Turn...Here are a balanced SSFP and RF-Spoiled post-contrast image. Which is the image on the left?

1) RF-Spoiled Post Gd

2) Balanced SSFP

25

Page 26: Gradient Spoiling - web.stanford.edu · Section C2 B.Hargreaves - RAD 229 Gradient Spoiling •Average balanced SSFP magnetization •Reduce sensitivity to off-resonance FFE, FISP,

B.Hargreaves - RAD 229Section C2

Your Turn...An RF-Spoiled and balanced SSFP image are shown. Which is on the right?

1) RF-Spoiled

2) Balanced SSFP

26

• bSSFP: Bright fluid, Opposed-phase, dark bands

Page 27: Gradient Spoiling - web.stanford.edu · Section C2 B.Hargreaves - RAD 229 Gradient Spoiling •Average balanced SSFP magnetization •Reduce sensitivity to off-resonance FFE, FISP,

B.Hargreaves - RAD 229Section C2

Flip Angle Selection

Ernst Angle Buxton 1990

27

Page 28: Gradient Spoiling - web.stanford.edu · Section C2 B.Hargreaves - RAD 229 Gradient Spoiling •Average balanced SSFP magnetization •Reduce sensitivity to off-resonance FFE, FISP,

B.Hargreaves - RAD 229Section C2

Flip Angle Selection?The best flip angle to use is found by:

1) Maximizing the image SNR

2) Maximizing contrast between certain tissues

3) Both 1 and 2

28

Page 29: Gradient Spoiling - web.stanford.edu · Section C2 B.Hargreaves - RAD 229 Gradient Spoiling •Average balanced SSFP magnetization •Reduce sensitivity to off-resonance FFE, FISP,

B.Hargreaves - RAD 229Section C2

Flip Angle Examples

Balanced SSFP

Gradient Spoiled

RF-Spoiled

5∘ 10∘ 20∘ 30∘ 40∘ 50∘

Best?

Best?

29

Page 30: Gradient Spoiling - web.stanford.edu · Section C2 B.Hargreaves - RAD 229 Gradient Spoiling •Average balanced SSFP magnetization •Reduce sensitivity to off-resonance FFE, FISP,

B.Hargreaves - RAD 229Section C2

Echo Time (TE) Considerations

• Longer TE: T2* weighting (BOLD, Perfusion)

• BOLD Imaging for fMRI

• T2*-weighted perfusion

• Short TE

• Reduced flow/motion sensitivity

• Reduced T2* weighting

• In-phase and Out-of-phase TE

• Water/Fat cancellation, Dixon Imaging

30

Page 31: Gradient Spoiling - web.stanford.edu · Section C2 B.Hargreaves - RAD 229 Gradient Spoiling •Average balanced SSFP magnetization •Reduce sensitivity to off-resonance FFE, FISP,

B.Hargreaves - RAD 229Section C2

Blood-Oxygen Level Dependent (BOLD) Imaging

Bandettini, et al. NMR Biomed (1994)31

Page 32: Gradient Spoiling - web.stanford.edu · Section C2 B.Hargreaves - RAD 229 Gradient Spoiling •Average balanced SSFP magnetization •Reduce sensitivity to off-resonance FFE, FISP,

B.Hargreaves - RAD 229Section C2

tGx

t=TE

Full Echo

tGx

t=TE

Partial Echo

Clinical MRI, ed. Edelman, R et al., W.B. Saunders Co., 1996TE=9 TE=7

Echo Time Reduction

32

Page 33: Gradient Spoiling - web.stanford.edu · Section C2 B.Hargreaves - RAD 229 Gradient Spoiling •Average balanced SSFP magnetization •Reduce sensitivity to off-resonance FFE, FISP,

B.Hargreaves - RAD 229Section C2

Short TE to Reduce Artifacts• Fractional TE reduces motion and flow sensitivity

Fractional TEFull TE

Freq

33

Page 34: Gradient Spoiling - web.stanford.edu · Section C2 B.Hargreaves - RAD 229 Gradient Spoiling •Average balanced SSFP magnetization •Reduce sensitivity to off-resonance FFE, FISP,

B.Hargreaves - RAD 229Section C2

TE and balanced SSFP• SSFP signal is refocused at TE = TR/2

• Fat / water are often opposed-phase

• SSFP is naturally flow-compensated

RF-SpoiledBalanced SSFP34

Page 35: Gradient Spoiling - web.stanford.edu · Section C2 B.Hargreaves - RAD 229 Gradient Spoiling •Average balanced SSFP magnetization •Reduce sensitivity to off-resonance FFE, FISP,

B.Hargreaves - RAD 229Section C2

Ultrashort TE Imaging

(Courtesy of Jiang Du, Graeme Bydder)UTEFast Spin Echo

35

Page 36: Gradient Spoiling - web.stanford.edu · Section C2 B.Hargreaves - RAD 229 Gradient Spoiling •Average balanced SSFP magnetization •Reduce sensitivity to off-resonance FFE, FISP,

B.Hargreaves - RAD 229Section C2

Magnetization Preparation Options

• Fat Saturation

• Inversion - Recovery

• Myocardial Tagging

• T2-prep

• Magnetization Transfer

Mag Prep

Imaging Sequence

Mag Prep...

36

Page 37: Gradient Spoiling - web.stanford.edu · Section C2 B.Hargreaves - RAD 229 Gradient Spoiling •Average balanced SSFP magnetization •Reduce sensitivity to off-resonance FFE, FISP,

B.Hargreaves - RAD 229Section C2

Cardiac: bSSFP and IR-RF-Spoiled

IR-Prep RF-SpoiledBalanced SSFP

37

Page 38: Gradient Spoiling - web.stanford.edu · Section C2 B.Hargreaves - RAD 229 Gradient Spoiling •Average balanced SSFP magnetization •Reduce sensitivity to off-resonance FFE, FISP,

B.Hargreaves - RAD 229Section C2

Gradient Echo Summary

•Spoiling Variations •Flip Angle Selection •Echo Time (TE) Selection •Magnetization Preparation

38