glast lat projectmarch 24, 2003 2a tracker peer review, wbs 4.1.4 1 glast large area telescope:...
TRANSCRIPT
GLAST LAT Project March 24, 2003
2A Tracker Peer Review, WBS 4.1.4 1
GLAST Large Area Telescope:GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Tracker SubsystemWBS 4.1.4
2A: Electronics Design and Status
Robert JohnsonSanta Cruz Institute for Particle PhysicsUniversity of California at Santa CruzTracker Subsystem Manager
Gamma-ray Large Gamma-ray Large Area Space Area Space TelescopeTelescope
GLAST LAT Project March 24, 2003
2A Tracker Peer Review, WBS 4.1.4 2
TKR Electronics RequirementsTKR Electronics Requirements
• Details of the requirements are in released LAT documents:– LAT-SS-17 Level-3 Performance requirements– LAT-SS-134 Level-4 Mechanical & Thermal
requirements– LAT-SS-152 Level-4 Electronics requirements
• The major challenges are– Low power: <168 W of conditioned power
• Less than 0.29 W per MCM or 190 W/channel• The flight design achieves 0.25 W per MCM!
– Low noise occupancy: (noise trigger rate <500 Hz)• The trigger requires occupancy less than 5/100,000
ch/trigger• Readout and onboard processing requires <1/10,000
ch/trigger• The beam-test/balloon flight tracker achieved much better…
– Compact packaging: bring signals around the tray corner– Manufacturing and QC: 884,736 channels, >98% functional– Reliability: design, redundancy, testing
GLAST LAT Project March 24, 2003
2A Tracker Peer Review, WBS 4.1.4 3
Some Detailed RequirementsSome Detailed Requirements
• Internal charge injection for calibration and test, with pulse-height control and arbitrary selection of channels.
• Threshold uniformity: <15 mV rms across 64 channels.• Threshold control per GTFE chip by an internal DAC.• Dead time & Readout speed: less than 10% at 10 kHz
cosmic rate.• TOT: measure up to 4 MIPs. • Non-destructive readback of configuration registers.• Error checking: event alignment; command & data parity.• Layer-OR jitter <250 ns for a charge deposit > 0.5 MIP.• Reliability:
– Redundant readout paths.– Redundant power paths.– Protection against power shorts.
• Radiation hardness: 4 kRad TID; >37 MeV/mg/cm2 SEL thresh
• Passive cooling; temperature monitoring.
GLAST LAT Project March 24, 2003
2A Tracker Peer Review, WBS 4.1.4 4
Tracker Readout ArchitectureTracker Readout ArchitectureEmphasis on compactness, minimum of wiring, and redundancy:• Serial, LVDS readout and control lines on flat flex-circuit cables.• Either of the two communications cables can fail without affecting the other.• Two readout and control paths for every 64-channel front-end chip.• Any single chip can fail without preventing the readout of any other.
24 64-channel amplifier-discriminator chips for each detector layer
2 readoutcontroller chipsfor each layer
Con
trol
sig
nal f
low
Control signal flow
Data flow to FPGAon DAQ TEM board.
Data flow to FPGAon DAQ TEM board.
Control signal flow
Data flow
Nine detector layers are read out on each side of each tower.
GTRC
GTFEGTFE
GTRC
GTRC
GTRC
GTRC
GTRC
9-998509A22
• Trigger output = OR of all 1536 channels in a layer.
• Upon trigger (6-fold coincidence) data are latched into a 4-event-deep buffer in each front-end chip.
• Read command moves data into 1 of 2 GTRC buffers.
• Token moves data from GTRCs to TEM.
GLAST LAT Project March 24, 2003
2A Tracker Peer Review, WBS 4.1.4 5
Tracker Readout ArchitectureTracker Readout Architecture
• Block diagram of the ends of two readout layers and their connections to the TEM
– Clock, Command, Trigger, and Reset are bussed to the GTRC chips
– Token and Data daisy-chain up and down the 9 layers
– Each layers sends its Layer-OR directly to the TEM
– The TEM communicates only with the GTRC chips, always by serial LVDS.
– The GTRC communicates with 24 GTFE chips on the MCM.
TEM
NTREQ
NTACK
NSCMD
CLK
NRESET
TO
KE
N
NS
DA
TA
TACKB
SCMD_OUT
CLKB
CTRLREG
TREQ_IN
RD_IN
NT
OK
EN
_OU
T
NS
DA
TA
_IN
GTRC
GTFE
A3
A2
A1
A0
LEFT
RESETO
RESETB
RESETB
NTREQ
NTACK
NSCMD
CLK
NRESET
TO
KE
N
NS
DA
TA
TACKB
SCMD_OUT
CLKB
CTRLREG
TREQ_IN
RD_IN
NT
OK
EN
_OU
T
NS
DA
TA
_IN
GTRC
GTFE
A3
A2
A1
A0
LEFT
GLAST LAT Project March 24, 2003
2A Tracker Peer Review, WBS 4.1.4 6
MCM Readout Module ConfigurationMCM Readout Module Configuration
• 8-layer polyimide PWB• Top edge thickened and machined to a
0.64 mm radius• 1-layer flex circuit (“pitch adapter”)
bonded over the radius• Fully encapsulated wire bonds• Conformal coating• 2 Omnetics nano connectors• Steel mounting screws + adhesive
Readout IC
Machined corner radius with flex circuit bonded around the curve
TMCM, attached by screws
Detector
Tray Structure
Bias circuit
High-thermal conductivity transfer adhesive
Readout IC
Machined corner radius with flex circuit bonded around the curve
TMCM, attached by screws
Detector
Tray Structure
Bias circuit
High-thermal conductivity transfer adhesive
Machined corner radius with flex circuit bonded around the curve
TMCM, attached by screws
Detector
Tray Structure
Bias circuit
High-thermal conductivity transfer adhesive
24.58mm18.0mm
359.0mm
Grounding Screws3 Total
Mounting Screws, 1 of 8
Connector, 1 of 2
GTFE, 1 of 24GTRC, 1 of 2
GLAST LAT Project March 24, 2003
2A Tracker Peer Review, WBS 4.1.4 7
MCM PWB Layout ConceptMCM PWB Layout Concept
• Low-noise environment for the amplifier chips
• 8 layers are used for good analog/digital separation plus low-impedance ground and power planes.
• Analog and digital traces are well separated and never wrap around each other.
• Power planes and split analog/digital GND planes
• Complete planes are also used for the SSD bias and AVDD2low impedance path to the decoupling caps for the SSD signal return.
Analog Traces and Planes
Digital TracesDigital Pwr/Gnd
Analog PwrAnalog Gnd
ICR, C, etc.Stackup and
arrangement of conductors in the PWB
1. Digital traces; SMT parts; ASICs
2. Digital busses
3. Split digital/analog power
4. Split digital/analog ground
5. Analog ground
6. Analog traces from ASICs to the SMT parts
7. AVDD2 (analog 1.5V)
8. Detector bias
GLAST LAT Project March 24, 2003
2A Tracker Peer Review, WBS 4.1.4 8
Pitch AdapterPitch Adapter
• 1-layer Kapton flex circuit• Ni + Au plating for wire bonding• Precision tooling holes (not
shown)• Circuit & traces are trimmed to
length after bonding to the PWB (see Presentation 6E)
SS
D S
ide
(2
28
m
pitch)
AS
IC S
ide
“ground”
Bias HV
GLAST LAT Project March 24, 2003
2A Tracker Peer Review, WBS 4.1.4 9
F.E. Readout Chip (GTFE)F.E. Readout Chip (GTFE)
• Schematics-based design, using standard cells for logic.
• Standard-cell I/O pad ESD protection.
• Manual layout of the analog channel, I/O cells, memory, global routing.
• Automated place-and-route of the logic blocks.
• Design verification: Spice and gate level simulations; DRC; LVS; simulation of the final extracted netlist in Nanosim.
64 amplifier-discriminator channels.
4-deep event memory (addressed by TEM)Custom layout 2 custom DACs
Trigger and Data mask registersStandard-cell auto route
Control logic, command decodersStandard-cell auto route
Cap
Calibration mask and capacitors
I/O pads and protection structures
GLAST LAT Project March 24, 2003
2A Tracker Peer Review, WBS 4.1.4 10
GTFE Block DiagramGTFE Block Diagram
S
OUT
A
B
64
64
64
641
2D
C
Q
D
C
Q
LEFT/RIGHT
DEAFMODE
DATA OUT
64
67 X 4
EVENT BUFFER
2
2
W_ADDR
R_ADDR
WRITE STROBE
L1T
READ CMD
WRITE
CONTROL
READ
CONTROL
LOAD
DATAFROM
PREVIOUSGTFE
DATA READ SHIFT REGISTER
DATA MASK & READOUT REGISTER
TRIGGER MASK & READOUT REGISTER
DISCRIMINATORS
SHAPERS
PREAMPLIFIERS
CALIBRATE STROBE
LEFT COMMANDDECODER
RIGHT COMMANDDECODER
CMDL
CLKL
CMDR
CLKR
RESET
7 7
DAC REGISTER
CALIBDAC
THRESHDAC
64 ANALOG INPUTS
S
CTRLREG
FAST-OR
MODEREG
SEL ADDRESSED
(TRI STATE)
LEFT COMMAND SELECT
DATA HIT
DATA HIT
LOAD/READ TRIGGER MASK
LOAD/READ CALIBRATE MASKLOAD/READ MODE REGISTERLOAD/READ DAC REGISTERCALIBRATE STROBE
MUX
641TRIGGER FROM PREVIOUS GTFE
FROM SILICON STRIPS
CALIB. MASK & READOUT REGISTER
EVENT_TRIG
EVENT_DATAEVENT_OR
• 64 amplifier-discriminator channels
• 7-bit threshold DAC
• Calibration mask register
• 7-bit calibration DAC
• Trigger mask register and trigger layer-OR
• Data mask register
• 4-deep event buffer
• Pair of redundant command decoders
• Pair of redundant trigger receivers
• Leftward readout register
• Rightward readout register
• LVDS I/O cells
GLAST LAT Project March 24, 2003
2A Tracker Peer Review, WBS 4.1.4 11
Readout Controller Chip (GTRC)Readout Controller Chip (GTRC)• All digital• Tanner standard-cells, except for
• LVDS I/O cells.• SEU hardened configuration
register.• RAM (64 hits, 2 buffers)
• Design in VHDL; synthesis, auto place and route.
• Verification: VHDL sim; DRC; LVS; Nanosim of extracted netlist.
GLAST LAT Project March 24, 2003
2A Tracker Peer Review, WBS 4.1.4 12
Readout CablesReadout Cables
• Standard-technology 4-layer Kapton flex circuits
• 8 unique layouts (with identical schematics)
• Require 36-inch panels for manufacture• Power traces/planes, LVDS signals, and
thermistor loops• Procurement specification: LAT-PS-01132
Thru-holes for Micro-D connector
EM cable manufactured by Parlex
Thermistor Location
Solder pads for nano-connector
4 Termination resistors
GLAST LAT Project March 24, 2003
2A Tracker Peer Review, WBS 4.1.4 13
Electronics CoolingElectronics Cooling
• Low IC power density (20 MHz clock): – GTFE chip: 7.8 mW for 0.33 cm2 0.024 W/ cm2
– GTRC chip: 32 mW for 0.12 cm2 0.26 W/cm2
• Total MCM power of 0.25 W is spread by the PWB over about 100 cm2 along the tray edge 2.4 mW/cm2. The 8-layer board has several full copper planes to spread the heat.
• A 5-mil 3M high-thermal-conductivity transfer adhesive lies between the MCM and carbon-carbon tray closeout.
• The carbon-carbon carries the heat to the sidewall through a 20 cm long boss and 10 fasteners into the tower sidewalls.
• The 1.5 mm thick K13D/YS90 sidewalls carry the heat to the bottom of the tower.
• Copper straps carry heat from the sidewalls into the Grid.• SSDs stay below 30°C operational. The ICs will be only a few
degrees warmer.
GLAST LAT Project March 24, 2003
2A Tracker Peer Review, WBS 4.1.4 14
Example EM TrayExample EM Tray
Connector Saver
Handle for assembly fixtures
Thermal Boss
Bias Circuit
MCM
Encapsulated ASICs
• The bias circuit is a 2-layer Kapton flex circuit.
• Top layer: 16 wire-bond pads (Ni-Au plating) + HV bias traces and bulls-eye pads for conductive adhesive.
• Bottom layer: hatched “ground” plane.
GLAST LAT Project March 24, 2003
2A Tracker Peer Review, WBS 4.1.4 15
Grounding & ShieldingGrounding & Shielding
FILTER FILTER
TKR/CAL_FE
ACD_FEFILTER
ACD ASSY
FILTER
TEM ASSY.
EPU
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
POWER ASSY.
DIST-GLT ASSY. SPACECRAFT
T
28 VOLTS
MIL-1553
SSR
HSKP
GRID COMMON
SPACECRAFT
SUBSYSTEM
GROUND
COMMON
SIU
FILTER
BONDINGSTRAP
( ONE PLACE )
FILTERFILTER
OUTER SHIELDGRID CABLE
LAT RF SHIELD
BOX ENCLOSURE
LAT Overview
GLAST LAT Project March 24, 2003
2A Tracker Peer Review, WBS 4.1.4 16
Tracker Grounding & ShieldingTracker Grounding & Shielding
Aluminum covering on all 6 sides
Conductive tape on joints
Cu thermal straps provide the conduction path to the Grid
8 cables ground the 19 trays & electronics to the TEM
Zillion screws tie the sidewalls into the trays
GLAST LAT Project March 24, 2003
2A Tracker Peer Review, WBS 4.1.4 17
Tray Grounding & ShieldingTray Grounding & Shielding
• The bias circuit includes a hatched “gnd” plane (actually 1.5 V) that corresponds to the amplifier voltage reference. It separates the SSDs from the structure and couples closely to the 120 V bias on the backs of the SSDs.
• The MCMs have separate analog and digital ground planes with separate returns to the TEM, but they are coupled together on each MCM by an SMT jumper.
• 3 long screws tie each MCM ground into the aluminum core
Aluminum HexCell
C.F. Laminate Bias Plane
Silicon Strip Detectors
C.C.F. Close-Out
Mounting Screws
Multi-Chip Module (MCM)
Wire bonds & Right Angle Interconnect
GLAST LAT Project March 24, 2003
2A Tracker Peer Review, WBS 4.1.4 18
Tray Grounding & ShieldingTray Grounding & Shielding
• The 1.5 V analog supply (AVDDA) feeds the source of the input FET and is thus the small-signal reference of the detector system.
• It couples to the SSD bias via HV capacitors on the MCM and through the capacitance of the bias circuit.
• This provides the small-signal current return path of the detector system.
• All voltage supplies occupy planes on the MCM and are coupled to ground via numerous ceramic and tantalum capacitors on the MCM.
GLAST LAT Project March 24, 2003
2A Tracker Peer Review, WBS 4.1.4 19
EMI/EMCEMI/EMC
• The Tracker will be well shielded:– All transmitted signals are LVDS and digital (very low radiation and
excellent noise rejection). In addition, power and ground reference planes are always directly under or over the signal pairs.
– Aluminum foil (over carbon-fiber) covering all 6 tower module sides.
– Conductive tape around the corners to connect the sides.
• SSD strips are the sensitive nodes, but– They are well shielded from any radiation.
– Only a very local reference is needed (the amplifiers are millimeters from the strips with well identified, short current return paths).
– The local grounding around the SSDs is critical for noise performance.
• EM emissions will be tested from the qual unit, but we expect it to satisfy requirements easily (433-RQMT-0005). Preliminary measurements on the BTEM showed no measurable emission, even with the aluminum shielding walls removed.
GLAST LAT Project March 24, 2003
2A Tracker Peer Review, WBS 4.1.4 20
EMI/EMCEMI/EMC
• Primary document 433-RQMT-005• Radiated Emissions (RE101, RE102)
– 20% of total emissions are allocated to subsystems outside LAT RF shield• ACD, Tracker, Heaters
– 60% of total emissions are allocated to subsystems inside LAT shield
• Radiated Susceptibility (RS101,RS103)– All subsystems must meet Section 5.3 of 433-RQMT-005
• Conducted Emissions (CE101, CECM)– Only the T&DF subsystem is affected and must meet
requirements• Conducted Susceptibility (CS101, CS116)
– Only the T&DF subsystem is affected and must meet requirements
GLAST LAT Project March 24, 2003
2A Tracker Peer Review, WBS 4.1.4 21
BTEM EMI TestBTEM EMI Test
Spectrum Analyzer
BTEM with Shield
removed
Electric field antenna
Magnetic field antenna
No measurable EMI detected, clock on or off, even with the tower shield removed.
GLAST LAT Project March 24, 2003
2A Tracker Peer Review, WBS 4.1.4 22
Prototype Electronics PerformancePrototype Electronics Performance
• See LAT-TD-1090. Reviewed at TKR ASIC review Dec 6, 2002.• Analog tests with “mini-MCM” plus full-length ladder (384 channels)
– Gain and noise from charge-inject/threshold scans– Noise measurements from trigger-rate threshold scans– Noise occupancy from random triggers– Noise injection from digital readout– Gain versus number of channels pulsed– Pulse shapes and Time-Over-Threshold
• Functional tests with full MCMs (no SSDs attached)– All digital functionality– Power consumption– Voltage and timing margins– DAC calibrations– Thermal cycling
• Radiation Testing
See Presentation 3B for more recent results on Engineering-Model trays.
GLAST LAT Project March 24, 2003
2A Tracker Peer Review, WBS 4.1.4 23
Threshold DispersionThreshold Dispersion
The RMS dispersion, with or without SSDs connected, is below 8 mV, better than the requirements.
The dispersion is independent of the number of channels simultaneously pulsed.
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Threshold DAC Setting
0
20
40
60
80
100H
it E
ffic
ien
cy
G Chip, with 32 Channels Pulsed Simultaneously
No load on inputs.
GLAST LAT Project March 24, 2003
2A Tracker Peer Review, WBS 4.1.4 24
Trigger RatesTrigger Rates
0 1 2 3
Threshold/Gain (fC)
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
Ra
te (
Hz)
G0G1G2F3F21F22
Trigger Rate per Chip (64 Channels)
1.3 fC=1/4 MIP
Long TOT pulses; look like cosmic rays
Three ladders connected to mini-MCMs were tested. These are the results for Ladder-0
GLAST LAT Project March 24, 2003
2A Tracker Peer Review, WBS 4.1.4 25
Noise OccupancyNoise Occupancy
0 100 200 300
Channel Number
0
2
4
6
No
ise
Hits
Ladder 0, 80V bias, 1.3 fC threshold, 1.5 million triggers.
Our first direct measurement of noise occupancy with the new electronics system.
GLAST LAT Project March 24, 2003
2A Tracker Peer Review, WBS 4.1.4 26
MCM Power ConsumptionMCM Power Consumption
AVDDA
1.5 V
AVDDB
2.5 V
DVDD
2.5 V address 5
DVDD
2.5 V address 0
No Clock 77.4 mW 39.3 mW 82.8 mW
20 MHz 77.4 mW 39.3 mW 134.3 mW 138.5 mW
MCM Power (W) Allocation
MCM Address > 0 0.251
MCM Address = 0 0.255
Tower 9.05 10.5 W
16 Towers 145 168 W
GLAST LAT Project March 24, 2003
2A Tracker Peer Review, WBS 4.1.4 27
ASIC Review Action ItemsASIC Review Action Items
• Test full trays• Test noise 1 channel at a time• Noise occupancy vs threshold (deviation from gaussian noise)• Noise versus threshold• Efficiency vs threshold• Test FIB ICs with ladder• Test at high rates• Wafer probing system (see Presentation 5D)• Approved parts (see Presentation 5B)• Procurements (see Presentation 5A)
GLAST LAT Project March 24, 2003
2A Tracker Peer Review, WBS 4.1.4 28
Actions from ASIC ReviewActions from ASIC Review
• Measurements with complete trays (EM mini-tower)– Four trays, with a total of 6 SSD planes have been tested.
– Initially there were noise problems that were solved by fixing the grounding
• Grounding of the Al core via long screws in the MCM (always has been a Level-IV specification).
• Grounding of the metallic tray service/storage box.
– Now the noise and gain are consistent with what has been seen on the mini-MCMs connected to single ladders.
Long grounding screw in plated-through hole. (Conformal coat had to be scraped off.)
Aluminum handle (part of service box), also grounded to the core.
GLAST LAT Project March 24, 2003
2A Tracker Peer Review, WBS 4.1.4 29
Actions from the ASIC ReviewActions from the ASIC Review
• Example Layer-OR counting rate from 1 GTFE chip on a mini-tower tray (OR of 64 channels).
Threshold scan FE 21
0,01
0,1
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Threshold DAC
Co
un
tin
g r
ate
(H
z)
GLAST LAT Project March 24, 2003
2A Tracker Peer Review, WBS 4.1.4 30
Actions from ASIC ReviewActions from ASIC Review
• Make threshold scans on G and F version chips pulsing only one channel per chip at a time.– Pulsing only one channel, the noise sigma was about the same
for G and F versions.– This confirmed the suspicion that the higher noise sigma seen in
the F chip was related to crosstalk effects when multiple channels were pulsed.
• Measure noise occupancy versus threshold and determine at which threshold the occupancy deviates from gaussian noise. – The resulting plots give noise sigmas consistent with
expectations.– Deviations from the exponential curve at low threshold are due to
saturation from the time-over-threshold. We cannot see any evidence of spurious pickup.
GLAST LAT Project March 24, 2003
2A Tracker Peer Review, WBS 4.1.4 31
Example Noise Rate PlotExample Noise Rate Plot
OR of 64 Channels. With a gain of 75 mV/fC the fitted ENC is 1710 electrons.
GTFE3
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
0 1 2 3 4 5
Thr**2 (fC**2)
ln(r
ate) ln(rate)
Fit
GLAST LAT Project March 24, 2003
2A Tracker Peer Review, WBS 4.1.4 32
Single-Channel Noise RatesSingle-Channel Noise Rates
• Only one channel at a time is enabled in the trigger mask, and the Layer-OR rate is measured by a frequency counter at each threshold setting.
• Two channels from the first chip are shown below.• Fitted noise ENC: 1580 electrons and 1542 electrons respectively.• No evidence of excess noise down to as low as 0.5 fC threshold.
Channel 0, Chip 0, Ladder 11
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
Thr**2 (fC**2)
ln(r
ate)
Channel 31, Chip 0, Ladder 11
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
Thr**2 (fC**2)
ln(r
ate)
GLAST LAT Project March 24, 2003
2A Tracker Peer Review, WBS 4.1.4 33
Actions from ASIC ReviewActions from ASIC Review
10 14 18 22 26 30Threshold
500
1000
1500
2000
Averaged Chip Noise vs Threshold Setting
Error bars shown for Chip 0 are the RMS spreads of the 64 channels
Chip 0Chip 1Chip 2Chip 3 Chips 0, 2, and 3 are FIB’ed ICs
GLAST LAT Project March 24, 2003
2A Tracker Peer Review, WBS 4.1.4 34
Actions from ASIC ReviewActions from ASIC Review
• Study the how the efficiency varies with threshold.– This was studied by the Bari group by Monte Carlo.– See LAT-TD-1128. The simulation is for single muons.
Threshold (MIP) 0 degrees 40 degrees
0.25 99.9 99.9
0.30 98.5 96.0
0.35 98.2 94.0
0.40 97.7 92.4
0.45 96.3 90.8
0.50 92.0 89.5
GLAST LAT Project March 24, 2003
2A Tracker Peer Review, WBS 4.1.4 35
Actions from the ASIC ReviewActions from the ASIC Review
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
64 128
Strip number
Co
un
tin
g r
ate
(H
z)
Source(100 Hz) + noise (1 kHz)Source (100 Hz)
• Test the system at high rates– This was done with a ladder, mini-MCM, and SLAC EGSE.– Self trigger, using the Layer-OR, and lower the thresholds on a
subset of channels to achieve high trigger rates.– No new problems were found.– Below is a source profile at low and high trigger rates.
GLAST LAT Project March 24, 2003
2A Tracker Peer Review, WBS 4.1.4 36
Prelim. Results on the Flight ASICsPrelim. Results on the Flight ASICs
• GTFE V-G3: 1 wafer was diced without prior probe testing:
– 14 ICs were mounted on mini-MCMs and 4 on a full-size MCM (also populated with 20 older-version GTFE chips).
– All 18 randomly selected chips worked 100%.
– No evidence of the comparator instability that plagued the previous version (all 18 chips show identical behavior, with stable Layer-OR outputs even at the minimum threshold setting).
– The timing margin on the register read-back was corrected:• All 4 chips on the full-size MCM load and read correctly at VDD=2.5V up to
28 MHz (old versions fail at 23 MHz).• All 4 chips also load and read correctly at VDD=2.25V and 20 MHz.
– One mini-MCM was connected to a full-size ladder. Noise performance is similar to the previous versions.
• GTRC V-6: 1 wafer was diced without prior probe testing
– Tested with probe card & test suite, as well as on mini-MCM and full MCM
– All functionality is correct.
– Timing margin improved: data readout works up to 30 MHz at 2.5V
GLAST LAT Project March 24, 2003
2A Tracker Peer Review, WBS 4.1.4 37
GTFE Version-G3 Noise FitsGTFE Version-G3 Noise Fits
• Example noise rate vs. threshold for a channel connected to an SSD strip.
• Distribution of fitted noise values, for a fitted average gain of 74 mV/fC.
GTFE G3
0
5
10
15
20
25
015
030
045
060
075
090
010
5012
0013
5015
0016
5018
0019
50
Noise
Fre
qu
en
cy Avg.=1634 e
Channel 12
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
Thr**2 (fC**2)
ln(r
ate)
1638 electrons