ggg ppt
TRANSCRIPT
8/6/2019 ggg ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ggg-ppt 1/26
M AJOR PROJECT ON´A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON
ELECTROLUX AND LG
RERIFREGATOR IN
BILASPUR CITYµ
Gagandeep Singh Jaswal
MBA 4th SEM
CHOUKSEY ENGG.
COLLEGE.
8/6/2019 ggg ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ggg-ppt 2/26
CONTENTS
1.COMPANY PROFILE
2.OBJECTIVES.
3.COMPARATIVE STUDY.
4.RESEARCH METHODOLOGY.
5.DATA ANALYSIS AND
INTREPRETAION.
6.HYPOTHESIS TESTING.
7.FINDINGS.
8.RECOMMENDATION.
9.CONCLUSION.
8/6/2019 ggg ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ggg-ppt 3/26
COMPANY PROFILE
ELECTROLUX
Electrolux manufacturer of refrigerators
and washing machines acquired Maharaja
International Ltd five years back and
later went for joint ventures withKelvinator and Voltas Ltd.
8/6/2019 ggg ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ggg-ppt 4/26
8/6/2019 ggg ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ggg-ppt 5/26
OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY
To compare the sales volume of these brand
(Electrolux and LG).
To find out what are the various factors (brand,
price, durability, convenience etc.) which influence
customer·s preference to buy refrigerator of
particular brand.
To find the customer awareness regarding the
refrigerators.
To find out the reason of preferences of consumers
towards refrigerator of particular brand
To find out the consumer perception, satisfaction
level towards particular brand of refrigerators.
8/6/2019 ggg ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ggg-ppt 6/26
MEANING OF COMPARATIVE
STUDY:
Comparative study reveals the
competitive position of the company as
well as competitor's activities. It is of
paramount of importance to measure theshare of market owned y a company·s
product by assessing its own strengths
and weaknesses.
8/6/2019 ggg ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ggg-ppt 7/26
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Research: Descriptive
Sample unit: Customers.
Sample size: 100
Universe: Bilaspur City
y Collection of data: -
y Primary data: Through personal interview from electrolux
and LG refrigretor Consumer.
y Secondary data: Internet, Company brochers, Newspaper,.
8/6/2019 ggg ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ggg-ppt 8/26
D ATA ANALYSIS ANDINTERPRETATION
8/6/2019 ggg ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ggg-ppt 9/26
8/6/2019 ggg ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ggg-ppt 10/26
2. REASON FOR SELECTING LG
REFRIGERATOR.
25%
15%
20%
5%
35% BRAND IMAGE
EFFECTIVENESSPRICE
STATUS SYMBOL
USER FRIENDLY
8/6/2019 ggg ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ggg-ppt 11/26
3. REASON FOR SELECTING
ELECTROLUX REFRIGERATOR.
35%
20%
5%
30%
10%
BRAND IMAGE
EFFECTIVENESS
PRICE
STATUS SYMBOL
USER FRIENDLY
8/6/2019 ggg ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ggg-ppt 12/26
4. SPECIFIC FACTOR CUSTOMER
SEARCH IN REFRIGERATORS.
18%
5%
55%
22%
DISPLAY
PRICE
FUNCTIONS
GOOD PHYSICAL
APPEARANCE
8/6/2019 ggg ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ggg-ppt 13/26
5. REASON FOR USING REFRIGERATOR.
14%
20%
58%
8%
For Business
PurposeFor Modernization
Easy way of food
preservation
For Status Symbol
8/6/2019 ggg ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ggg-ppt 14/26
6. BRAND SWITCHING IN CASE OF A
PARTICULAR PRODUCT.
70%
20%
10%
YES
NO
CAN·T SAY
8/6/2019 ggg ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ggg-ppt 15/26
7.CUSTOMER VIEW REGARDING THE
PRICING OF A PARTICULAR BRAND
(REFRIGERATORS).
15
10
1213
3
1415
8
6
4
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Highly
satisfied
Satisfied Indifferent Dissatisfied Highly
dissatisfied
Electrolux
LG
8/6/2019 ggg ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ggg-ppt 16/26
8.M ARKET SHARE OF ELECTROLUX AND
LG REFRIGRETOR?
8/6/2019 ggg ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ggg-ppt 17/26
55
31
5
9
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
El c l x LG
i c i
Di i c i
9.CUSTOMER SATISFACTION LEVEL
OF LG AND ELECTROLUX
REFRIGERATORS.
8/6/2019 ggg ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ggg-ppt 18/26
HYPOTHESIS
H0: Consumers are dissatisfied with LG.
Ha: Consumers are satisfied with
Electrolux.
8/6/2019 ggg ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ggg-ppt 19/26
CHI SQUARE TEST
Oi Ei Oi-Ei (Oi-Ei)2 (Oi-Ei)2 / Ei
Highly
Satisfied
29 20 9 81 4.05
Satisfied 25 20 5 25 1.25
Indifferent 20 20 0 0 0
Dissatisfie
d
19 20 -1 1 0.05
Highly
dissatisfied
7 20 -13 169 8.45
Total 13.8
8/6/2019 ggg ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ggg-ppt 20/26
X 2 = � (Oi-Ei)2 / Ei = 13.8
Calculated Value = 13.8
Degree of freedom = (n-1)
= 5-1
= 4
Level of significance = 5%
Tabulated value = 9.488
The table value of X2 for 4 degree of freedom at 5% level of significance is
9.488.so the tabulated value < calculated value.
Interpretation
The calculated value of X2 is higher than this table value. So our Ha (alternative
hypothesis) is selected.
8/6/2019 ggg ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ggg-ppt 21/26
FINDINGS
Reputation of the company or its image in themind of people played an important role in
deciding about the brand of refrigerators.
The price of the refrigerators is one of the
important factors who affect the buying behavior
of the customer.
Price of LG refrigerators is less as compared to
the ELECTROLUX refrigerators.
Customer are prefer ELECTROLUX refrigerators
rather than LG refrigerators. Market share of ELECTROLUX refrigerators in
Bilaspur city is 60%.
8/6/2019 ggg ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ggg-ppt 22/26
RECOMMENDATIONS
Companies should also target lower middle class,because due to industrial development the
income of this class is increasing and they are
being capable to use the refrigerator.
It can be suggested that the companies shouldhave wide range of refrigerator to take different
segment or Market. If company offers more
choices, the more changes the customers will buy
the company's product. Moreover, on that count
the company can convince the customers abouttheir price level adopted even it is higher in his
eyes.
8/6/2019 ggg ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ggg-ppt 23/26
Company should have direct contact with not
only dealers but also with retailer, in this way
company may aware about retailer's problemsand customer perceptions also.
Frequently feedback should be taken from
customer regarding their problems in availability
of refrigerators.
8/6/2019 ggg ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ggg-ppt 24/26
LIMITATION OF STUDY
As company's official of Head quarter/office were
far away from the researcher so the research was
based on information provided by the company
websites as secondary data.
Due to administrative constraint the sample size
is restricted to small figure.
The cost consideration is taken into account. The
expenses bear by researcher himself.
8/6/2019 ggg ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ggg-ppt 25/26
CONCLUSION
8/6/2019 ggg ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ggg-ppt 26/26
THANK
YOU