geospatial intermodal freight transportation (gift)

23
© 2009 Rochester Institute of Technology Geospatial Intermodal Freight Transportation (GIFT)

Upload: others

Post on 24-Oct-2021

8 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Geospatial Intermodal Freight Transportation (GIFT)

© 2009 Rochester Institute of Technology

Geospatial Intermodal Freight Transportation (GIFT)

Page 2: Geospatial Intermodal Freight Transportation (GIFT)

200

© 2009 Rochester Institute of Technology

Topics  The problem: Trade-offs between the

economic, environmental, and energy impacts of freight transportation

  Intermodal freight transportation can help address the problems  GIFT enables trade-off case studies

 The GIFT model

Page 3: Geospatial Intermodal Freight Transportation (GIFT)

The Problems

Page 4: Geospatial Intermodal Freight Transportation (GIFT)

200

© 2009 Rochester Institute of Technology

US Freight Transportation Emissions

  Freight accounts for 470 MMTCO2 annually (7.8% total US CO2 emissions)

  Contributes about 50% of NOx emissions and 40% of PM emissions from transportation sources (EPA)

Freight Truck 70%

Freight Air 9%

Freight Rail 8%

Freight Marine (Domestic and International)

13%

Proportion of Carbon Emissions by Freight Type, 2004

(US DOE, 2007)

Page 5: Geospatial Intermodal Freight Transportation (GIFT)

200

© 2009 Rochester Institute of Technology

Goods Movement and GDP

3000

3200

3400

3600

3800

4000

4200

4400

4600

4800

6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 11000 12000

Ton-

Mile

s (B

illio

ns)

GDP (Billions, 2000$)

Ton-Miles v. GDP for the U.S. (1987-2005)

For every trillion dollar increase in GDP, we expect an additional 242 billion ton-miles.

Page 6: Geospatial Intermodal Freight Transportation (GIFT)

200

© 2009 Rochester Institute of Technology

Carbon Comparisons by Mode

Mode gCO2/tkm

Truck 153

Rail 13

Ship (Dom.) 19

Air 1135

Values in the above table are based on top-down analysis; emissions factors can change considerably based on specific cargo and mode characteristics. Data from the BTS, Special Release, Table 1-46b: http://www.bts.gov/publications/national_transportation_statistics/.

1

10

100

1,000

10,000

Truck Rail Ship (Domestic)

Air

Gtk

m/y

r and

TgC

O2/

yr

Gtkm/yr TgCO2/yr

Page 7: Geospatial Intermodal Freight Transportation (GIFT)

200

© 2009 Rochester Institute of Technology

Research Questions   What are the energy and environmental impacts

of freight transportation?   How do these impacts change:

 With modal choice?  With changing infrastructure?  With the use of new technologies in transit or at

transfer facilities?

GIFT is a model designed to address these questions

Page 8: Geospatial Intermodal Freight Transportation (GIFT)

200

© 2009 Rochester Institute of Technology

Port-Generated Traffic Local Congestion; National Delays

International Shipping Studies

Which mode is preferred

for least cost?

for least time?

for lowest emissions?

East Coast Freight Studies

Great Lakes GIFT Studies

GIFT Projects

Page 9: Geospatial Intermodal Freight Transportation (GIFT)

200

© 2009 Rochester Institute of Technology

Least Cost Least Time Least CO2 Primary Mode Ship Truck Rail Operating Cost ($) $240 $330 $290 Time (hrs) 15.5 6 15.5 CO2 (kg) 128 340 96 PM10 (g) 55 70 65 NOx (g) 4190 2210 2450

Example: Study Trade-Offs in Great Lakes Region

  Study implications of policies such as carbon tax, feebates, etc.

  Study impact of infrastructure investment

  Study impact of key supply chain flows

  etc.

Page 10: Geospatial Intermodal Freight Transportation (GIFT)

200

© 2009 Rochester Institute of Technology

Great Lakes Case Useful for evaluating tradeoffs and running experiments for different input values (e.g., costs, speed, emissions). Can be helpful for determining “green” supply chain pathways.

Primary Mode Ship Truck Rail

Cost ($) 240 330 290 Time (hrs) 20 6 15 CO2 (kg) 115 340 95

Page 11: Geospatial Intermodal Freight Transportation (GIFT)

200

© 2009 Rochester Institute of Technology

Great Lakes Case Useful for exploring infrastructure and technology investment decisions. For example, we could look at varying time delays to mimic port expansion options.

Page 12: Geospatial Intermodal Freight Transportation (GIFT)

The GIFT Model

Page 13: Geospatial Intermodal Freight Transportation (GIFT)

200

© 2009 Rochester Institute of Technology

Connect Multiple Transportation Mode Networks at Intermodal Transfer Facilities

Road Network Rail Network

Waterway Network Intermodal Transfer Facility

Page 14: Geospatial Intermodal Freight Transportation (GIFT)

200

© 2009 Rochester Institute of Technology

GIFT North American Network

Page 15: Geospatial Intermodal Freight Transportation (GIFT)

200

© 2009 Rochester Institute of Technology

… NOx CO2 Energy Operating Cost

Time Distance Truck Segment “Costs”

Define Economic, Time, Energy and Environmental Costs of Traversing Each

Network Segment

  There is a “cost” (time, $, energy, environmental impact) associated with traversing each segment of the transportation network

  Costs are computed based on network information, user-input data, and external computations

  ESRI ArcGIS Network Analyst finds the least cost routes  Allows trade-off studies of least time, least economic cost,

least emissions, etc.

Page 16: Geospatial Intermodal Freight Transportation (GIFT)

200

© 2009 Rochester Institute of Technology

User-Specified Cost Factors

Specify the vehicle and facility operational characteristics to use in a given analysis scenario

Page 17: Geospatial Intermodal Freight Transportation (GIFT)

200

© 2009 Rochester Institute of Technology

Integrated Emissions Factor Calculators

Select from pre-defined vehicles Define and save new vehicles

Page 18: Geospatial Intermodal Freight Transportation (GIFT)

200

© 2009 Rochester Institute of Technology

Data Flow for GIFT Analysis

Vehicle and Facility Emissions and Operations Data •  Trucks, Trains, Ships •  Ports, Rail yards,

Distribution centers

Transportation Network Geospatial Data •  Highways, Railroads,

Waterways •  Multimodal transfer

facilities •  Barriers and restrictions

Freight Flow Data •  Originations/ Destinations •  Volumes

Freight Transportation Data

Vehicle and Facility Selection and Characterization

Scenario Configuration

Data Network Configuration •  Barriers and

restriction settings

•  Optimization attributes

Freight Flow Selection and Characterization

Geospatial Intermodal

Freight Transportation (GIFT) Analysis

Scenario Data Comparison and Analysis for Case

Studies

Scenario Analysis Results

Page 19: Geospatial Intermodal Freight Transportation (GIFT)

200

© 2009 Rochester Institute of Technology

Integrate International Trade Patterns with the Domestic Freight System

Page 20: Geospatial Intermodal Freight Transportation (GIFT)

200

© 2009 Rochester Institute of Technology

Mortality from Ship Emissions: A Global Assessment

Cardiopulmonary mortality attributable to ship PM2.5 emissions worldwide

(Corbett, Winebrake, et al.)

Page 21: Geospatial Intermodal Freight Transportation (GIFT)

200

© 2009 Rochester Institute of Technology

Sustainable Supply Chain Research

2008 © J.J. Winebrake & J.J. Corbett

Intermodal system analyses that improve freight decisions through collaborative, innovative, data-driven transformative research to make the future of freight more sustainable.

Page 22: Geospatial Intermodal Freight Transportation (GIFT)

200

© 2009 Rochester Institute of Technology

Conclusions   Freight transportation is an essential enabler of a

vibrant economy   Freight transportation is a significant contributor

to energy consumption and environment emissions

  Intermodal freight transportation provides opportunities to balance economic, energy, and environmental impacts of freight movement

  GIFT enables a rich analysis of the trade-offs and opportunities of intermodal freight transportation

Page 23: Geospatial Intermodal Freight Transportation (GIFT)

200

© 2009 Rochester Institute of Technology

Contact Information

James Winebrake +1 585-475-4648 [email protected]

James Corbett +1 302-831-0768 [email protected]

Scott Hawker +1 585-475-2705 [email protected]

RIT Laboratory for Environmental Computing and Decision Making

http://lecdm.rit.edu