generation options for idaho’s energy plan arne olson energy & environmental economics, inc....

58
Generation Options Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy for Idaho’s Energy Plan Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise, Idaho Boise, Idaho August 10, 2006 August 10, 2006 353 Sacramento Street, Suite 1700 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 391-5100 http:// www.ethree.com

Upload: alexina-stanley

Post on 26-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

Generation Options Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy for Idaho’s Energy

PlanPlanArne Olson

Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3)

Presented to:Presented to:

Subcommittee on Generation Resources Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise, IdahoBoise, Idaho

August 10, 2006August 10, 2006353 Sacramento Street, Suite 1700

San Francisco, CA 94111Telephone: (415) 391-5100

http://www.ethree.com

Page 2: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 2

Goals for The Morning Goals for The Morning SessionSession

Get a good understanding of the important Get a good understanding of the important attributes of various resource types and how they attributes of various resource types and how they line up with the Committee’s draft Policy line up with the Committee’s draft Policy ObjectivesObjectives

Understand the “base case”: what resources are Understand the “base case”: what resources are likely to be developed in Idaho or on behalf of likely to be developed in Idaho or on behalf of Idaho ratepayers in the absence of Committee Idaho ratepayers in the absence of Committee actionaction

Understand how the interests of energy suppliers Understand how the interests of energy suppliers and end-users align with those of Idaho citizensand end-users align with those of Idaho citizens

See what goals others in similar positions have See what goals others in similar positions have come up withcome up with

Page 3: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 3

Roadmap for Developing Roadmap for Developing the Energy Planthe Energy Plan

UnderstaUnderstand where nd where

we are we are todaytoday

Decide Decide where we where we want to want to

go go tomorrotomorro

ww

Figure Figure out the out the

best best ways to ways to

get thereget there

Implement Implement the the

approved approved measuresmeasures

NegotiatNegotiate e

through through legislativlegislative processe process

You are

here

RepeaRepeatt

Page 4: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 4

Facts about Energy in Facts about Energy in IdahoIdaho

Affordable, reliable energy is a necessity for Affordable, reliable energy is a necessity for public health and safety and for the functioning public health and safety and for the functioning of a modern economyof a modern economy

Despite low electricity and natural gas rates, Despite low electricity and natural gas rates, energy is a larger burden for households in energy is a larger burden for households in Idaho than in most other states due to higher Idaho than in most other states due to higher consumptionconsumption

100% of Idaho’s petroleum and natural gas and 100% of Idaho’s petroleum and natural gas and approximately 50% of its electricity comes from approximately 50% of its electricity comes from outside the stateoutside the state

Idaho investor-owned utilities remain vertically Idaho investor-owned utilities remain vertically integrated and under full regulation of the integrated and under full regulation of the Idaho PUCIdaho PUC

Page 5: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

Draft Policy Draft Policy ObjectivesObjectives

Page 6: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 6

Policy ObjectivesPolicy Objectives1.1. Reliability, StabilityReliability, Stability

2.2. Low-Cost, AffordabilityLow-Cost, Affordability

3.3. Environment, ConservationEnvironment, Conservation

4.4. Jobs, EconomyJobs, Economy

5.5. FlexibilityFlexibility

Action Action ItemItem

Policy Policy StatemeStateme

ntnt

Policy Policy StatementStatement

Policy Policy StatemeStateme

ntnt

Policy Policy StatemeStateme

ntnt

Action Action ItemItem

Action Action ItemItem

Action Action ItemItem

Proposed Structure of Plan Proposed Structure of Plan FindingsFindings

Page 7: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 7

Draft Policy ObjectivesDraft Policy Objectives

1.1. Ensure a secure, reliable and stable energy system Ensure a secure, reliable and stable energy system for the citizens and businesses of Idahofor the citizens and businesses of Idaho

2.2. Maintain Idaho’s low-cost energy supply and Maintain Idaho’s low-cost energy supply and ensure access to affordable energy for all Idahoansensure access to affordable energy for all Idahoans

3.3. Protect Idaho’s public health, safety and natural Protect Idaho’s public health, safety and natural environment and conserve Idaho’s natural environment and conserve Idaho’s natural resourcesresources

4.4. Promote sustainable economic growth, job creation Promote sustainable economic growth, job creation and rural economic development through and rural economic development through investments in Idaho’s energy infrastructureinvestments in Idaho’s energy infrastructure

5.5. Provide the means for Idaho’s energy policy to Provide the means for Idaho’s energy policy to adapt to changing circumstancesadapt to changing circumstances

Page 8: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

Discussion of Discussion of Resource TypesResource Types

Page 9: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 9

The Electric GridThe Electric Grid

Generation:Generation: Can be owned by utility or by Can be owned by utility or by independent power producer (IPP)independent power producer (IPP)

Transmission:Transmission: Generally owned by utility, regulated Generally owned by utility, regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commissionby the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Distribution:Distribution: Owned by utility, regulated by the Owned by utility, regulated by the statesstates

Page 10: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 10

Who Acquires Generating Who Acquires Generating Resources in Idaho?Resources in Idaho?

Investor-owned utilities acquire resources, Investor-owned utilities acquire resources, via ownership or contract, to meet growing via ownership or contract, to meet growing loadload

Municipals and cooperatives will have to Municipals and cooperatives will have to start acquiring resources beginning in 2012start acquiring resources beginning in 2012 ““Allocation” of federal power from BPA will be Allocation” of federal power from BPA will be

fixed instead of growing to match loadsfixed instead of growing to match loads

End-use customers can acquire “behind-End-use customers can acquire “behind-the-meter” generationthe-meter” generation Industrial cogeneration through PURPAIndustrial cogeneration through PURPA Net metering of solar photovoltaic systemsNet metering of solar photovoltaic systems

Page 11: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 11

State Regulation of Electric State Regulation of Electric

and Gas Utilitiesand Gas Utilities ““Regulatory compact” took shape in the Regulatory compact” took shape in the

1920s and 1930s1920s and 1930s Utility has the obligation to serve to all customersUtility has the obligation to serve to all customers Utility has the opportunity to earn a fair return on Utility has the opportunity to earn a fair return on

prudent investmentsprudent investments

Utilities earn profits by investing in facilities Utilities earn profits by investing in facilities for which they receive a regulated rate of for which they receive a regulated rate of returnreturn

PUC sets rates to recover utility’s cost of PUC sets rates to recover utility’s cost of service plus return on prudent investmentsservice plus return on prudent investments Evidentiary hearings with multiple participantsEvidentiary hearings with multiple participants

Page 12: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 12

Economic Incentives of Economic Incentives of Utilities under State Utilities under State

Regulation Regulation Because return is based on investment, Because return is based on investment,

utilities will have the incentive to grow the rate utilities will have the incentive to grow the rate base by making base by making capital investmentscapital investments

All else being equal, utilities will prefer a All else being equal, utilities will prefer a self-self-build build option over an IPP contract, even if the option over an IPP contract, even if the IPP contract is more cost-effectiveIPP contract is more cost-effective

Because their rate of return is regulated, Because their rate of return is regulated, utilities have the incentive to utilities have the incentive to minimize riskminimize risk

Utilities have little incentive to encourage Utilities have little incentive to encourage conservation, because lower sales means less conservation, because lower sales means less revenuerevenue

Page 13: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 13

Utility Resource Utility Resource PlanningPlanning

Resource plans evaluate “portfolios” of Resource plans evaluate “portfolios” of resources according to three general criteria:resources according to three general criteria: Reliability (i.e., resource adequacy)Reliability (i.e., resource adequacy) CostCost RiskRisk

Individual resources are evaluated for how they Individual resources are evaluated for how they contribute to the three portfolio goalscontribute to the three portfolio goals

““Integrated Resource Planning” (IRP) considers Integrated Resource Planning” (IRP) considers conservation/energy efficiency as resourceconservation/energy efficiency as resource

Investor-owned utilities file IRPs with the PUCInvestor-owned utilities file IRPs with the PUC

Page 14: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 14

Important Characteristics Important Characteristics of Resource Optionsof Resource Options

Utilities always consider:Utilities always consider: Cost Cost Operations (baseload vs. peaker vs. intermittent)Operations (baseload vs. peaker vs. intermittent) Fuel price variabilityFuel price variability

Utilities sometimes consider:Utilities sometimes consider: Environmental impact (separate from cost or Environmental impact (separate from cost or

risk)risk) Effect of conservation on utility revenuesEffect of conservation on utility revenues

Utilities generally don’t consider:Utilities generally don’t consider: Economic development, local jobs, tax baseEconomic development, local jobs, tax base

Page 15: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 15

Relative Cost of Resource Relative Cost of Resource OptionsOptions

Gas-fired resources are cheap to build but Gas-fired resources are cheap to build but expensive to operateexpensive to operate

Coal, nuclear & renewables are generally Coal, nuclear & renewables are generally expensive to build but cheap to operateexpensive to build but cheap to operate

Gas was resource of choice from late ’80s to Gas was resource of choice from late ’80s to early ’00searly ’00s

Higher gas prices have sparked renewed Higher gas prices have sparked renewed interest in coal, renewables and even nuclearinterest in coal, renewables and even nuclear

Resource Type

Gas Combined

CyclePulverized Coal Steam

Coal Gasification Nuclear Wind Geothermal

Run-of-River Hydro

Solar/Ocean Wave/Tidal

Energy Efficiency

CostDepends on Gas Prices

Low Medium High Medium Site-specific Site-specific HighMeasure-specific

Page 16: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 16

OperationsOperations

Gas-fired resources are flexible and can be used for Gas-fired resources are flexible and can be used for peakingpeaking

Coal, nuclear, & geothermal operate as baseload (24x7) Coal, nuclear, & geothermal operate as baseload (24x7) resourcesresources

Intermittent resources (wind, solar, run-of-river hydro) Intermittent resources (wind, solar, run-of-river hydro) generate energy only when the resource is availablegenerate energy only when the resource is available Wind fluctuates from day-to-day and hour-to-hourWind fluctuates from day-to-day and hour-to-hour Requires additional capacity to be built and maintained in Requires additional capacity to be built and maintained in

“ready” condition in case wind stops blowing“ready” condition in case wind stops blowing ““Integration” of wind costs $5-15/MWhIntegration” of wind costs $5-15/MWh

Resource Type

Gas Combined

CyclePulverized Coal Steam

Coal Gasification Nuclear Wind Geothermal

Run-of-River Hydro

Solar/Ocean Wave/Tidal

Energy Efficiency

Operations Flexible Baseload Baseload Baseload Intermittent Baseload Intermittent IntermittentMeasure-specific

Page 17: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 17

Fuel Price VariabilityFuel Price Variability

Gas prices are highly volatile, and 80% of Gas prices are highly volatile, and 80% of cost is variablecost is variable

Coal is less volatile than gas, and 80% of Coal is less volatile than gas, and 80% of cost is fixedcost is fixed

Conservation, nuclear and renewables have Conservation, nuclear and renewables have no fuel price volatilityno fuel price volatility

A diversified resource portfolio is less A diversified resource portfolio is less variable than relying heavily on one resourcevariable than relying heavily on one resource

Resource Type

Gas Combined

CyclePulverized Coal Steam

Coal Gasification Nuclear Wind Geothermal

Run-of-River Hydro

Solar/Ocean Wave/Tidal

Energy Efficiency

Fuel Price Variability

High Medium Medium Low Low Low Low Low Low

Page 18: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 18

Environmental Impact Environmental Impact

Even modern conventional coal facilities have Even modern conventional coal facilities have much higher emissions of “criteria” pollutants much higher emissions of “criteria” pollutants than gasthan gas

Coal gasification eliminates some of the Coal gasification eliminates some of the emissions, but still does not match gasemissions, but still does not match gas

Impacts of renewables are very site-specificImpacts of renewables are very site-specific Efficiency/Conservation can be net positiveEfficiency/Conservation can be net positive

Resource Type

Gas Combined

CyclePulverized Coal Steam

Coal Gasification Nuclear Wind Geothermal

Run-of-River Hydro

Solar/Ocean Wave/Tidal

Energy Efficiency

Environmental Impact

Medium High Medium High Low Medium Low LowLow or Net

Positive

Page 19: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 19

Estimated Emissions Rates of New Generating Technologies in lbs. per MWh

Particulate Matter (PM10)

0.040

0.106

0.051

Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

0.004

0.757

0.311

Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx)

0.078

0.528

0.355

Carbon Monoxide (CO)

0.010

0.880

0.217

Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

0.001

0.021

0.012

Mercury (Hg)

-

0.0000066

0.0000055

ConventionalPulverizedCoal

CoalGasificationCombinedCycle

Combined-Cycle NaturalGas

Page 20: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 20

Another Source of New Another Source of New Generator Emissions RatesGenerator Emissions Rates

Source: Virginia DEQ (http://www.deq.virginia.gov/air/sab/comparison1008.pdf)

Page 21: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 21

Emissions Rates of Emissions Rates of Uncontrolled vs. Uncontrolled vs.

New Generators in lbs./MWhNew Generators in lbs./MWhSulfur Dioxide (SO2)

0.004

0.311

0.757

8.462

- 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00

Existing UncontrolledCoal Steam

New Pulverized Coal

Integrated CoalGasification

Natural GasCombustion Turbine

Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx)

0.078

0.355

0.528

4.787

- 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00

Page 22: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 22

Climate Change/Carbon Climate Change/Carbon Regulation in Utility IRPs Regulation in Utility IRPs

Low Cases ($ per ton CO2)Low Cases ($ per ton CO2) *Avista: *Avista: nonenone Idaho Power:Idaho Power: nonenone PacifiCorp:PacifiCorp: nonenone

Medium Cases ($ per ton Medium Cases ($ per ton CO2)CO2) Avista: Avista: $7-15$7-15 *Idaho Power:*Idaho Power:$12$12 *PacifiCorp:*PacifiCorp: $8$8

High Cases ($ per ton CO2)High Cases ($ per ton CO2) Avista:Avista: $22-60$22-60 Idaho Power:Idaho Power: $49$49 PacifiCorp:PacifiCorp: $40$40

* = Base * = Base CaseCase

““The company believes that The company believes that some form of GHG emissions some form of GHG emissions regulation will occur at some regulation will occur at some point in the future.” – point in the future.” – AvistaAvista

““It is likely that carbon dioxide It is likely that carbon dioxide emissions will be regulated emissions will be regulated within the thirty-year within the thirty-year timeframe addressed in the timeframe addressed in the 2004 IRP.” – 2004 IRP.” – Idaho PowerIdaho Power

““The global scientific The global scientific community has offered community has offered compelling evidence of the compelling evidence of the effect of man-made greenhouse effect of man-made greenhouse gas emissions on future gas emissions on future climate conditions. It is climate conditions. It is therefore prudent to recognize therefore prudent to recognize … the potential for costs … the potential for costs associated with …climate associated with …climate change policy.” – change policy.” – PacifiCorp PacifiCorp

Page 23: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 23

Economic Development Economic Development

Coal and nuclear facilities are large local Coal and nuclear facilities are large local employersemployers

Local renewables can have a positive Local renewables can have a positive impact on rural communitiesimpact on rural communities

Wind, hydro and gas facilities operate Wind, hydro and gas facilities operate without substantial labor requirementswithout substantial labor requirements

Conservation creates dispersed labor force Conservation creates dispersed labor force & increases income through lower bills& increases income through lower bills

Resource Type

Gas Combined

CyclePulverized Coal Steam

Coal Gasification Nuclear Wind Geothermal

Run-of-River Hydro

Solar/Ocean Wave/Tidal

Energy Efficiency

Economic Development

Small Large Large Large Medium Medium Small Large Large

Page 24: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 24

Characteristics of Characteristics of Different Resource TypesDifferent Resource Types

Resource Type

Gas Combined

CyclePulverized Coal Steam

Coal Gasification Nuclear Wind Geothermal

Run-of-River Hydro

Solar/Ocean Wave/Tidal

Energy Efficiency

CostDepends on Gas Prices

Low Medium High Medium Site-specific Site-specific HighMeasure-specific

Operations Flexible Baseload Baseload Baseload Intermittent Baseload Intermittent IntermittentMeasure-specific

Fuel Price Variability

High Medium Medium Low Low Low Low Low Low

Environmental Impact

Medium High Medium High Low Medium Low LowLow or Net

Positive

Economic Development

Small Large Large Large Medium Medium Small Large Large

Page 25: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 25

Effect of Conservation on Effect of Conservation on Utility Revenues and RatesUtility Revenues and Rates

Conservation reduces Conservation reduces some utility costs some utility costs because less energy must because less energy must be generated, but many be generated, but many costs are fixedcosts are fixed

Conservation reduces Conservation reduces sales, meaning fixed sales, meaning fixed costs must be allocated costs must be allocated over a smaller sales baseover a smaller sales base

This dynamic creates This dynamic creates different incentives for different incentives for different playersdifferent players

From the perspective of utility From the perspective of utility shareholders, conservation shareholders, conservation reduces sales and revenuesreduces sales and revenues

From the perspective of From the perspective of Idaho citizens, cost-effective Idaho citizens, cost-effective

conservation reduces conservation reduces average energy billsaverage energy bills

From the perspective From the perspective of utility ratepayers, of utility ratepayers,

conservation conservation increases ratesincreases rates

Page 26: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 26

Remote Resources in the Remote Resources in the WestWest

There are a variety of There are a variety of resources located in resources located in remote areas that would remote areas that would require new transmissionrequire new transmission

A number of plans have A number of plans have been developed to build been developed to build transmission to exploit transmission to exploit these resources, but no these resources, but no commitmentscommitments

Tricky to get all the Tricky to get all the interests lined up to build interests lined up to build long-distance transmissionlong-distance transmission

Regional efforts are Regional efforts are ongoingongoing

Source: Northwest Power Pool

Page 27: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

““Base Case” Base Case” from Utility from Utility

IRPsIRPs

Page 28: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 28

Idaho Resource Needs over Idaho Resource Needs over the Next Ten Yearsthe Next Ten Years

Idaho load is growing Idaho load is growing relatively rapidly, particularly relatively rapidly, particularly peak demand in southern peak demand in southern IdahoIdaho

Idaho IOU loads are expected Idaho IOU loads are expected to grow by approximately to grow by approximately 630 630 aMWaMW by 2015 and by 2015 and 1,182 1,182 aMWaMW by 2025 by 2025

Idaho IOUs plan to acquire Idaho IOUs plan to acquire approximately approximately 937 aMW937 aMW of of new resources on behalf of new resources on behalf of Idaho customers by 2015Idaho customers by 2015

Fuel TypeResources

Added by 2015Loads

Load Growth 630Conservation 79

Net Load Growth 551Resources

Coal 547Hydro 13Natural Gas 54Petroleum 0Nuclear 0Wind 187Biomass 0Waste 0Landfill Gas 0Solar 0Geothermal 88Other Renewables 22Other 27

Total Resources 937

Page 29: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 29

Planned Resource Planned Resource Investments on Behalf of Investments on Behalf of Idaho Customers by 2015Idaho Customers by 2015

Coal, 547

Natural Gas, 54

Wind, 187

Other Renewables, 22

Geothermal, 88

Hydro, 13

Other, 27 Total Planned Resource Acquisitions:

937 aMW

Renewable Share of New Resources:

33%

Page 30: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 30

Planned Resource and Planned Resource and Conservation Investments Conservation Investments

in All States by 2015in All States by 2015

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

Avista Idaho Power PacifiCorp

Conservation

Other

Other Renewables

Geothermal

Wind

Natural Gas

Hydro

Coal

Planned Resources Additions by 2015,For Entire IOU - All States

aMW

Page 31: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 31

2005 Idaho Electricity 2005 Idaho Electricity Fuel MixFuel Mix

Coal47%

Hydro46%

Natural Gas6%

Renewables1%

Total ID Load in 2005:

2,353 aMW

Note: Fuel mix shown above includes aMW from Purchases/Contracts, which have been allocated based on the system fuel mix.432

Page 32: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 32

2015 Idaho Electricity 2015 Idaho Electricity Fuel MixFuel Mix

Coal48%

Hydro34%

Natural Gas9%

Renewables9%

Total ID Load in 2015:

2,983 aMW

Note: Fuel mix shown above includes aMW from Purchases/Contracts, which have been allocated based on the system fuel mix.211

Page 33: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 33

Historical Conservation Historical Conservation Achievements of Northwest Achievements of Northwest

UtilitiesUtilitiesHistorical Conservation Achievements as a Share of 2003 Load

20%18%

15% 15% 15%

11%9%

4%

8%

14%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

Eugen

e W

EB

Tacom

a Pow

er

Snoho

mish

PUD

Seattle

City

Ligh

t

Puget

Sou

nd E

nerg

y

Avista

Portla

nd G

ener

al

North

Wes

tern

PacifiC

orp

Idah

o Pow

er

Page 34: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 34

Planned Conservation Planned Conservation Investments of Idaho Investments of Idaho

Utilities by 2015Utilities by 2015Planned Conservation Investments vs.

Power Council Target, 2015

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Idaho Power Avista PacifiCorp

aMW

Planned Conservation Investment

Power Council Target

Page 35: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 35

States with Renewables States with Renewables Portfolio Standards and Portfolio Standards and

TargetsTargets

Idaho Base Case = 9%Idaho Base Case = 9%

Source: Pew Climate Trust

Page 36: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 36

Idaho Base Case Idaho Base Case SummarySummary

Idaho utilities plan to add 937 aMW of new Idaho utilities plan to add 937 aMW of new resources by 2015 to meet 630 aMW of new resources by 2015 to meet 630 aMW of new loadload

More than half of new resources would be coal-More than half of new resources would be coal-firedfired

Conservation and new renewables would Conservation and new renewables would constitute 41% of new resources and 62% of constitute 41% of new resources and 62% of new loadsnew loads

New renewables would constitute New renewables would constitute approximately approximately 9% of Idaho’s fuel mix in 20159% of Idaho’s fuel mix in 2015

Page 37: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

IPPs & PURPAIPPs & PURPA

Page 38: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 38

Independent Power Independent Power ProducersProducers

Independent power producers (IPPs) Independent power producers (IPPs) gained a foothold with passage of Public gained a foothold with passage of Public Utility Regulatory Policy Act (PURPA) in Utility Regulatory Policy Act (PURPA) in 19781978

Momentum accelerated after EPACT 92 Momentum accelerated after EPACT 92 and FERC Order 888 (1996)and FERC Order 888 (1996)

Today, IPPs generate around 35% of U.S. Today, IPPs generate around 35% of U.S. powerpower

Another possible source of supply for Another possible source of supply for Idaho utilitiesIdaho utilities

Page 39: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 39

Merchant vs. Utility Merchant vs. Utility FacilitiesFacilities

Utility FacilitiesUtility Facilities Developed under Developed under

state regulation in state regulation in conjunction with conjunction with obligation to serve obligation to serve

PUC reviews PUC reviews prudency and sets prudency and sets returnsreturns

Risks and returns Risks and returns shared among shared among utility shareholders utility shareholders and ratepayersand ratepayers

Merchant FacilitiesMerchant Facilities No obligations other No obligations other

than those spelled than those spelled out in contractout in contract

Physical output is Physical output is consumed locally, consumed locally, but economic but economic benefits accrue to benefits accrue to contractual ownercontractual owner

Risks and returns Risks and returns borne by merchant borne by merchant shareholders shareholders

Page 40: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 40

PURPA and QFsPURPA and QFs PURPA passed by Congress in 1978 to:PURPA passed by Congress in 1978 to:

Lessen dependence on foreign gas and oilLessen dependence on foreign gas and oil Alleviate inflationAlleviate inflation Improve the balance of paymentsImprove the balance of payments Preserve nation’s nonrenewable resourcesPreserve nation’s nonrenewable resources

Utilities must buy power from Qualifying Utilities must buy power from Qualifying Facilities (QFs) at their “avoided costs”Facilities (QFs) at their “avoided costs”

QFs include cogeneration and small QFs include cogeneration and small renewablesrenewables

Rates, terms, and conditions set by state Rates, terms, and conditions set by state commissionscommissions

Page 41: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 41

PURPA In IdahoPURPA In Idaho Idaho was one of the first states to adopt Idaho was one of the first states to adopt

PURPA and has been one of the most QF-PURPA and has been one of the most QF-friendlyfriendly

Rates, terms, and conditions for QF’s have Rates, terms, and conditions for QF’s have changed several times over the past 25 changed several times over the past 25 yearsyears

The fuel types of QFs have varied over the The fuel types of QFs have varied over the past 25 yearspast 25 years

Current PURPA rates around $60/MWhCurrent PURPA rates around $60/MWh Utilities would prefer to acquire renewables Utilities would prefer to acquire renewables

through IRPs rather than PURPAthrough IRPs rather than PURPA

Page 42: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 42

Cumulative PURPA Cumulative PURPA Contracts by Resource Contracts by Resource

TypeTypeIdaho PURPA Contracts

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

Co

ntr

acte

d M

W

COGENERATION GEOTHERMAL LANDFILL HYDRO WIND

Page 43: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 43

Small-Scale RenewablesSmall-Scale Renewables

Solar and wind power can be developed at the Solar and wind power can be developed at the residential scaleresidential scale

Cost-effective in remote applications that Cost-effective in remote applications that would otherwise require costly line extensionswould otherwise require costly line extensions

Increased demand for small-scale renewables, Increased demand for small-scale renewables, particularly solar, is expected to eventually particularly solar, is expected to eventually result in cost decreasesresult in cost decreases

Many states have promoted small-scale Many states have promoted small-scale renewables through net metering and/or tax renewables through net metering and/or tax credits credits

Page 44: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

Priorities from Priorities from Other Relevant Other Relevant

SourcesSources

Page 45: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 45

Northwest Power ActNorthwest Power Act PACIFIC NORTHWEST ELECTRIC POWER PACIFIC NORTHWEST ELECTRIC POWER

PLANNING AND CONSERVATION ACTPLANNING AND CONSERVATION ACT16 U.S.C. §§ 839-839h, December 5, 1980. 16 U.S.C. §§ 839-839h, December 5, 1980.

Established Northwest Power and Established Northwest Power and Conservation CouncilConservation Council

Directs the Council to adopt a regional Directs the Council to adopt a regional energy conservation and electric power planenergy conservation and electric power plan

Directs the Council to adopt a program to Directs the Council to adopt a program to protect, mitigate and enhance fish and protect, mitigate and enhance fish and wildlife on the Columbia River and its wildlife on the Columbia River and its tributaries tributaries

Page 46: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 46

Northwest Power Act: Northwest Power Act: PurposesPurposes

Assure the Pacific Northwest of an adequate, efficient, Assure the Pacific Northwest of an adequate, efficient, economical and reliable power supply; economical and reliable power supply;

Provide for the participation and consultation of the Provide for the participation and consultation of the Pacific Northwest states, local governments, consumers, Pacific Northwest states, local governments, consumers, customers, users of the Colombia River System (including customers, users of the Colombia River System (including federal and state fish and wildlife agencies and Indian federal and state fish and wildlife agencies and Indian tribes), and the public; tribes), and the public;

Ensure development of regional plans and programs Ensure development of regional plans and programs related to energy conservation; renewable and other related to energy conservation; renewable and other resources; resources;

Protect, mitigate, and enhance fish and wildlife resources;Protect, mitigate, and enhance fish and wildlife resources; Facilitate the planning of the region's power system; Facilitate the planning of the region's power system; Provide environmental quality. Provide environmental quality.

http://www.nwcouncil.org/LIBRARY/poweract/summary.htm

Page 47: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 47

Northwest Power Act: Northwest Power Act: Resource PrioritiesResource Priorities

Priority shall be given: first, to Priority shall be given: first, to conservation; second, to renewable conservation; second, to renewable resources; third, to generating resources; third, to generating resources utilizing waste heat or resources utilizing waste heat or generating resources of high fuel generating resources of high fuel conversion efficiency; and fourth, to conversion efficiency; and fourth, to all other resources. [Northwest all other resources. [Northwest Power Act, §4(e)(1), 94 Stat. 2705.] Power Act, §4(e)(1), 94 Stat. 2705.]

Page 48: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 48

1982 Idaho Energy Plan1982 Idaho Energy Plan High priority on conservation, renewables, and high High priority on conservation, renewables, and high

fuel efficiency generation before others. High fuel efficiency generation before others. High priority to hydroelectric projects.priority to hydroelectric projects. Carefully consider impacts on agricultureCarefully consider impacts on agriculture Favor conversion to natural gas heatingFavor conversion to natural gas heating Review and update curtailment plansReview and update curtailment plans Consider coal and nuclearConsider coal and nuclear Promote cogeneration and wood fuelPromote cogeneration and wood fuel Encourage development of municipal solid waste powerEncourage development of municipal solid waste power Identify potential for wind developmentIdentify potential for wind development

Promote petroleum and gas conservation, explorationPromote petroleum and gas conservation, exploration Encourage and support local governments in their Encourage and support local governments in their

efforts to promote energy awareness, efficiency and efforts to promote energy awareness, efficiency and resource development.resource development.

Page 49: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 49

Western Governors’ Western Governors’ Clean and Diversified Clean and Diversified

Energy InitiativeEnergy Initiative June 2004 resolution with the objective of:

“…identifying ways to increase the contribution of renewable energy, energy efficiency, and clean energy technologies within the context of the overall energy needs of the West.”

Four broad goals: Additional development of 30,000 MW of clean energy

by 2015; A 20% increase in energy efficiency by 2020; An ability to meet the transmission needs of the West

for the next 25 years; and Better position the Western energy system to respond

to new environmental challenges.

Page 50: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 50

Western Governors’ Western Governors’ Clean and Diversified Clean and Diversified

Energy InitiativeEnergy Initiative Specific recommendations for Specific recommendations for

transmission, wind, advanced coal, energy transmission, wind, advanced coal, energy efficiency, solar, biomass, geothermalefficiency, solar, biomass, geothermal

Not mandatory or binding on any stateNot mandatory or binding on any state Some of the recommendations already Some of the recommendations already

being implemented by regional being implemented by regional organizations in which Idaho parties are organizations in which Idaho parties are participatingparticipatingIdaho Share of 30,000 MW goal:Idaho Share of 30,000 MW goal: 1,085 1,085 MWMW

Current plans of Idaho IOUs:Current plans of Idaho IOUs: ~700 MW ~700 MW

Page 51: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 51

Washington: 2003 Energy Washington: 2003 Energy Strategy UpdateStrategy Update

Guiding Principle #1:Guiding Principle #1: Encourage all load-serving entities to adopt Encourage all load-serving entities to adopt and implement integrated resource plans.and implement integrated resource plans.

Guiding Principle #2:Guiding Principle #2: Encourage the development of a balanced, Encourage the development of a balanced, cost-effective and environmentally sound resource portfolio that cost-effective and environmentally sound resource portfolio that includes conservation, renewables, and least-cost conventional includes conservation, renewables, and least-cost conventional resources.resources.

Guiding Principle #3:Guiding Principle #3: Protect the benefits to Washington consumers Protect the benefits to Washington consumers from the Federal Columbia River Power and Transmission System from the Federal Columbia River Power and Transmission System (FCRPS).(FCRPS).

Guiding Principle #6:Guiding Principle #6: Foster a predictable and stable investment Foster a predictable and stable investment climate to facilitate adequate and efficient access to capital markets climate to facilitate adequate and efficient access to capital markets for independent power producers, federal agencies and Washington’s for independent power producers, federal agencies and Washington’s public and private energy industry.public and private energy industry.

Guiding Principle #7:Guiding Principle #7: Promote Washington State as a leader in Promote Washington State as a leader in clean energy technologies by supporting and attracting companies that clean energy technologies by supporting and attracting companies that are active in developing, manufacturing and selling these technologies. are active in developing, manufacturing and selling these technologies. In addition, lead by example with clean energy, energy efficiency, and In addition, lead by example with clean energy, energy efficiency, and sustainable practices in state and local government operations. sustainable practices in state and local government operations.

Page 52: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 52

Oregon Energy Plan Oregon Energy Plan 2005-20072005-2007

Policy PrioritiesPolicy Priorities Maximize energy conservation and Maximize energy conservation and

efficiencyefficiency Support a stable energy supply for Support a stable energy supply for

OregonOregon Support renewable energy Support renewable energy

development and technology development and technology companies in Oregoncompanies in Oregon

Page 53: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 53

Report from the Nevada Report from the Nevada Electric Energy Policy Electric Energy Policy

Committee (2001)Committee (2001)Recommendation 1 - Low Income Assistance This state shall implement energy affordability

programs so that the acquisition of essential energy services does not place an undue economic burden on Nevada households

Recommendation 3 - Incentives to Construct and Retain

Incent new generators to offer Nevada customers a portion of all electricity generated in the state.

Incent potential plant builders to build in geographic areas that have more water and to transmit electricity to areas of less water.

Page 54: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 54

Report from the Nevada Report from the Nevada Electric Energy Policy Electric Energy Policy

Committee (2001)Committee (2001)Recommendation 4 – Renewables The state of Nevada has great potential to

utilize its wind, solar and geothermal renewable resources. We recommend the state of Nevada develop an overall policy to support renewables in this state.

Recommendation 6 - Long-term / Permanent Energy Policy Committee

We recommend the Governor create a standing committee under the Executive branch to develop an energy policy including the status of the energy environment, competition, a long-term policy for renewables and conservation.

Page 55: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 55

California Energy Action California Energy Action Plan I (2003)Plan I (2003)

I.I. Optimize Energy Conservation and Optimize Energy Conservation and Resource EfficiencyResource Efficiency

II.II. Accelerate the State’s Goal for Accelerate the State’s Goal for Renewable GenerationRenewable Generation

III.III. Ensure Reliable, Affordable Ensure Reliable, Affordable Electricity GenerationElectricity Generation

V.V. Promote Customer and Utility Promote Customer and Utility Owned Distributed Generation Owned Distributed Generation

Page 56: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 56

California Energy Action California Energy Action Plan II: Implementation Plan II: Implementation

Roadmap (2005) Roadmap (2005) Endorses “Loading Order”: Endorses “Loading Order”:

Energy efficiency and demand response are preferred means of meeting growing energy needs.

Next, rely on renewable sources of power and distributed generation, such as combined heat and power applications

To the extent that efficiency, demand response, renewable resources, and distributed generation are unable to satisfy needs, support clean and efficient fossil-fired generation.

Page 57: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 57

Objectives of the 2003 Objectives of the 2003 North Carolina State North Carolina State

Energy PlanEnergy Plan Insure energy reliability for North Carolinians;Insure energy reliability for North Carolinians; Improve the public health and environmental Improve the public health and environmental

quality of our state;quality of our state; Develop policies that promote wise land use;Develop policies that promote wise land use; Implement strategies supportive of a sound Implement strategies supportive of a sound

North Carolina economy;North Carolina economy; Develop an achievable sustainable energy Develop an achievable sustainable energy

strategy for North Carolina; andstrategy for North Carolina; and Implement a strategy by which the state can Implement a strategy by which the state can

lead by example.lead by example.

Page 58: Generation Options for Idaho’s Energy Plan Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise,

August 10, 2006 58

North Carolina -- Action North Carolina -- Action ItemsItems

Support economic development of energy-related enterprises whose products are intended to increase energy efficiency or use renewable resources

Create a greenhouse gas registry to track emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases

Evaluate a renewable portfolio standard (RPS) that complements the NC GreenPower program

The General Assembly should require that all electric utilities in North Carolina provide generation disclosure of fuel mix percentages and emissions statistics

State Energy Office should assess and propose incentives and regulatory or administrative measures for development of renewable electricity generation facilities