garrett and hawkins, 2013, and now for something completely different: thinking through explorers...
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/13/2019 Garrett and Hawkins, 2013, And now for something completely different: Thinking through explorers subject-bodies, Antipode.
1/22
And Now For Something Completely Different
Thinking Through Explorer Subject!odie"# A $e"pon"e to %ott &nd $obert"
Bradley L. Garrett
School of Geography and the Environment
University of Oxford
!arriet !a"ins
#epartment of Geography
$oyal !ollo"ay% University of London
!arriet.!a"[email protected]
&e "ould lie to begin by thaning 'ott and $oberts for sparing a valuable conversation
regarding issues of social difference "ithin the contemporary urban exploration movement and
Antipodefor offering a platform for the discussion.(&e read )*ot everyone has +the, balls-
Urban exploration and the persistence of masculinist geography+'ott and $oberts /0(1,in the
midst of co2authoring a boo chapter on bodies% technologies% and affect through the production
and circulation of urban explorer imagery +Garrett and !a"ins forthcoming,. &here these t"o
conversations dovetailed% "e found much productive material. 3n "hat follo"s% "e tae up the
(4or those not familiar "ith urban exploration% it is a practice of accessing% and often documenting% off2limits urban
spaces +see Garrett /0(1a,.
(
-
8/13/2019 Garrett and Hawkins, 2013, And now for something completely different: Thinking through explorers subject-bodies, Antipode.
2/22
invitation that 'ott and $oberts offer to engage "ith 5uestions of social difference% and their call
to consider ho" feminist scholarship could 6significantly enrichen scholarship on 7urban
exploration89 +p./,./
&e "ant to tae this opportunity to open out a politics of urban exploration that% "hilst
concerned "ith revisiting the 5uestion of body2sub:ects 2 as 'ott and $oberts urge 2 suggests "e
might begin from some"here other than the particular understanding of socially differentiated
bodies that preoccupies their contribution. &e tae as our guides for such a pro:ect feminist
scholarship on corporeal materialisms and force relations by Eli;abeth Gros; +(
-
8/13/2019 Garrett and Hawkins, 2013, And now for something completely different: Thinking through explorers subject-bodies, Antipode.
3/22
necessarily only a beginning% much thining and empirical "or remains to be done on the
material and affective politics of the sub:ect and on the affective politics of the image "e outline
here% not only in terms of urban exploration% but also in broader disciplinary terms. &e hope%
ho"ever% "hat "e present here offers a productive response to 'ott and $oberts piece and
raises some 5uestions for future scholars of urban exploration to engage "ith.
A 'roblem&tic '&r&dox
4or us% a pivotal point of 'ott and $oberts article% and "here "e "ant to begin our comments% is
a paradox they identify-
6...on the one hand 7urban exploration8 emphasi;es embodiment and progressive politics% "hilst
on the other% there appears to be a reluctance to consider different inds of bodies and the
inclusionsCexclusions perpetuated through practices and discourses of exploration and the
privileged explorer2sub:ect. Ds long as this paradox remains unexamined% possibilities for a
radical engagement "ith the city through urbex "ill inevitably fall short9 +p.,.
vastly different motivations and concerns from disparate social bacgrounds. One explorer "rote- 63 felt that the
voice of the female explorer "as not present in the article. Dlso it seemed lie the authors only looed at a small
slice of UE culture% the part that is presented by mass media.9 4or others% it "as the narro"ness of the visual
representations chosen by 'ott and $oberts that "orried them% taing issue "ith the articles reproduction of "hat
they sa" as a by2product of the visual practices of a relatively small% but highly visible +online, sub2set of the
community. 'ott and $oberts "rite% 6"hile many "omen do engage in urbex% they figure often in photographic
representations of the practice as minority figures "ho appear to be going along "ith an activity that is largely ledand defined by the male explorers9 +p.(/,. Dmongst the reactions to this statement "ere responses that pointed
to"ard both exploration never documented and the "ealth of images that never made it onto blogs or into the public
domain that "ould have reframed this discussion. &hilst "e tae their points on a representational level% and agree
that the politics of these representations do deserve further criti5ue% "e found it unfortunate that the paper did not
open out a space in "hich visual representations and voices +from the "eb and else"here, could challenge those
vocal fe".
1
-
8/13/2019 Garrett and Hawkins, 2013, And now for something completely different: Thinking through explorers subject-bodies, Antipode.
4/22
&e certainly agree that the literature on urban exploration "ould benefit from a more explicit
engagement "ith difference +ho"ever it is to be understood,% given% as is implicit in the relatively
small body of scholarly "or that 'ott and $oberts engage% geographical analysis of the practice
is still incipient.=Ds both Bennett +/0((a, and Garrett +/0((c> /0(1b- (2//,% have argued% this is
a diverse community. 3t is one "here competing and contested identities and relationships to
place "or alongside attempts to order% control and rationali;e places and experiences.
'oreover% there is a valori;ation of certain modes of )discovery% some of "hich are
undoubtedly% as 'ott and $oberts forcefully demonstrate% shaped by particular performances of
masculinity.Ds Bennett +/0(1a, notes% ho"ever% they should not be reduced solely to such
performances.?4urther% and fascinatingly% these identity negotiations tae place across a range of
sites% the connections and interconnections of "hich are "orthy of further study> "hether these
be the embodied experiences of exploration% the forums and blogs of the online communities that
'ott and $oberts mae extensive use of% or the visual regimes and aesthetics produced in the
=&e "ould urge caution in too2soon constituting a 6geographic literature9 on urban exploration% as this is an
emergent topic consisting of a handful of articles by Lue Bennett +/0((a> /0((b> /0(1a> /0(1b, and Bradley
Garrett +/0(0> /0((a> /0((b> /0((c> /0((d> /0(/> /0(1a> /0(1b> /0(1c, +though also see raggs et al. /0(1 and#obras;c;y /00? for connected discussions,. 'ott and $oberts is an important intervention precisely because this
is a nascent vein of of geographic in5uiry% but "e "ould "orry that in building their argument they have concretised%often through the scaffold of blog posts% a body of scholarly "or that is far less voluminous they suggest +see also
footnote F,.5&ithin academic scholarship% both in and beyond geography% "e dofind important studies being penned that open
out some of these 5uestions about identity% discussing% for example% the role gender plays in urban exploration+rescott /0((> Bennett /0(1a,% the role of illness and disability +Genoso /00
-
8/13/2019 Garrett and Hawkins, 2013, And now for something completely different: Thinking through explorers subject-bodies, Antipode.
5/22
course of photographing and videoing urban exploration activities +rescott /0((> Bennett
/0(1b> Garrett and !a"ins forthcoming,.F
&here "e depart from 'ott and $oberts perspective% ho"ever% is in the tight e5uation
they dra" bet"een a failed politics of urban exploration I 6one that "ill inevitably fall short9 +p.
% emphasis added, I and "hat is% in their reading% of a lac of scholarly consideration of
bodiesCsub:ects understood primarily through 6social categories of age% sex% ethnicity% race and
disCability9 +Jacobs and *ash /001- /?,. 3n short% "hile "e agree that there is important% indeed
critical% "or to be done along such lines% there is also% "e contend% room for difference% the
social% and body2sub:ects to be understood differently% or at least for understandings of these
body2sub:ects% and their politics% to begin from a different place. &e see to brea do"n the
settlement 'ott and $oberts calculate bet"een a successful politics for urban exploration and
body2sub:ects sorted into named% no"n and represented identity categories% ho"ever
intersectional and performative these might be.
FAhe role of the virtual urban exploration community% to both explorers and others% is a fascinating topic +seeBennett /0((a,% "here there remains much scholarly "or to be done% not least about the far from simple position
occupied by urban exploration blogs that are both academic sites and points of engagement "ith the community +e.g.Garretts )lace !acing,. &e "ould urge caution% ho"ever% in the sometimes2too2easy conflation of sources that
perform different roles. Ao state the obvious% "hat a :ournal article is meant to do% is not "hat a blog post is meant to
do. &hile a :ournal article is often "ritten primarily to disseminate results of research to an academic audience%
taing clear theoretical stances and advancing no"ledge% a blog post may be meant to inspire community
gateeepers to grant access or inspire public interest in a research pro:ect. Ahese issues are further exacerbated "hen
using an in2text citation format "here these different modes of production are unclear. Ahese different modes of
production can themselves lead to a number of issues. Ds 'ott and $oberts text illustrates% it can be difficult to
appropriately ascertain "ho to credit ideas to. 4or example% a central citation to their argument about masculinity isthe follo"ing 5uote from the "ebsite Sleepy ity- 67h8is suggestion that "e laced balls confused us greatly% as
those "ho go head to head "ith the rolling stoc in the grimy% dimly lit% alcoveless metro tunnels are usually not
short on testicular fortitude% figuratively speaing9 +p.((,. Extracts from this 5uote appear several times +p.(/% p.(1,
and are implied in the title and are "rongly attributed to Garrett +the researcher,% rather than to the author of the
Sleepy ity blog% "hom Garrett accompanied to Barcelona as part of his field"or. 'istaes such as these can lead
to problematic and potentially damaging claims.
?
-
8/13/2019 Garrett and Hawkins, 2013, And now for something completely different: Thinking through explorers subject-bodies, Antipode.
6/22
3n "hat space remains "e "ant to lay the ground"or for a possible politics that begins
from other ideas of body2sub:ects and difference. 4irstly% "e return to ethnographic accounts of
the )doing of urban exploration and re2interrogate the ideas of the body2sub:ect "e find there.
Secondly% "e recoup "hat "e believe to be an important +contested, site for a political pro:ect of
urban exploration- the images created in the course of these activities. &e vie" this through the
lens of the urban explorer and artist 'iru Kim. &e conclude "ith brief reflections on "hat it
"ould mean to tae for"ard the version of a politics of urban exploration "e present here 2 one
version of "hat a politics of this practice might loo and feel lie.
!ecoming !odie"# Edgework &nd %eld
Unsurprisingly% debates around politics and the body often settle out as% at root% 5uestions that
concern the forms of politics and the ideas of the body2sub:ect upon "hich our perspectives rest.
3f 'ott and $oberts 5ueries concern social difference and the explorer2sub:ect% such as- 6&hose
bodies9% 6&hat counts as experience9 and 6&hat constitutes the exchange bet"een body and
place9 +p.F,. Our particular ans"er is directed less to"ard 5uestions of )&hose bodies% rather
"e as% perhaps more basically% 6&hat inds of bodies9 and 6&hat is meant by the body2
sub:ect% and ho" is such a sub:ect constituted9 +olls /0(/- =1,. 4urther% "e as 6&hat is the
relationship of this sub:ect to the "orld9. 4or us% this involves a reorientation from socially
sorted sub:ects% to consider% in the case of the ind of body2sub:ect "e find at "or in urban
exploration literature% the 6forces that provide the bacdrop to and are active in producing "hat
comes to be understood as )a sub:ect9 +olls /0(/- =1
-
8/13/2019 Garrett and Hawkins, 2013, And now for something completely different: Thinking through explorers subject-bodies, Antipode.
7/22
+Garrett /0((c> /0(/,. Edge"or is a multi2faceted term adapted from sociology and
criminology% often used in discussion of phenomenological experiences of high ris activities but
also applicable to more everyday practices "here normative behavior and routinised action are
engaged "ith critically.3n Garretts "riting% edge"or is a bodily doing that sees individuals
and collectives approaching various +material and immaterial, edges and boundaries. Aaing
form in physical challenges presented by literal features of urban architecture% or mental hurdles
particular to the individual% these edges and boundaries may be exceeded and relocated% or% in
another theoretical vocabulary deterritoriali;ed and reterritoriali;ed +Garrett /0(/> Garrett
/0(1a,.
Ahis territoriali;ation is a process "herein "e find the body2sub:ect not :ust open to
forces and sensations in the environment% but composed through a relationship "ith them.
Experimenting "ith this idea% Garrett deploys the meld% a term "ith a very particular materiality%
"herein the identity trappings of the socially2constructed sub:ect fall a"ay as a result of the
exploring sub:ects absorptive focus on their embodied actions and experiences% "hatever and
"herever these may be. #ramatic descriptions of becoming bodies in the midst of action aside%
"hat these accounts configure is a ind of corporeal morphology> a "ay of negotiating bodily
boundaries that has productive resonances "ith the body2city relations Gros; proposes-
6D model of relations bet"een bodies and cities "hich sees them not as megalithic total entities%
distinct identities% but as assemblages or collections of parts% capable of crossing the thresholds
bet"een substances to form linages% machines% provisional and often temporary sub2 or
Ahe term 6edge"or9 "as first used by Stephen Lyng% "ho adapted it from !unter S. Ahompson +(
-
8/13/2019 Garrett and Hawkins, 2013, And now for something completely different: Thinking through explorers subject-bodies, Antipode.
8/22
microgroupingsNa fundamentally disunified series of interconnections% a series of disparate
flo"s% energies% events or entities% and spaces% brought together or dra"n apart in more or less
temporary alignments9 +( energy and matter in a constant state of composition. Ao consider
these bodies is to tae account of the role of not :ust the personal% but also the impersonal and
interpersonal forces that compose sub:ects-
6Ninhuman forces% forces that are both living and non2living% macroscopic and microscopic%
above and belo" the level of the human are acno"ledged and allo"ed to displace the centrality
of both consciousness and unconsciousness9 +Gros; /00?- (M
-
8/13/2019 Garrett and Hawkins, 2013, And now for something completely different: Thinking through explorers subject-bodies, Antipode.
9/22
material bodies that can never be cleanly or clearly cleaved into a set of named% no"n and
represented identities9 +ibid.,. 3n Braidottis "ords-
6Ahe body refers to the materialist but also vitalist groundings of human sub:ectivity and to the
specifically human capacity to be both grounded and to flo" and thus to transcend the very
variablesclass% race% sex% gender% age% disability"hich structure us. 3t rests on a post2
identitarian vie" of "hat constitutes a sub:ect9 +/0(/- 11,.
Ahis is not then to see recourse to some sort of biological essentialism% or to deny that these
forms of body2sub:ect put much at ris "hen they see to escape categorical fixes% proposing 6a
more open% multiple% intangible and affective understanding of sub:ectivities9 +Jacobs and *ash
/001- /1?,. Ahe ris% articulated by 'ott and $oberts% is one of 6unintentionally reinstating the
unmared% disembodied% but implicitly masculine sub:ect9 +Jacobs and *ash /001- /1?,.
4urthermore% any theoretical frame"or that "ould enable% for example% aggressive sho"s of
masculism that% as 'ott and $oberts demonstrate% doexist in the urban exploration community%
to go unremared and unchallenged is clearly not acceptable. Ahat the emphasis on practical%
lived experience% and the pre2personal might lead to the centering of a sub:ect 6shorn of social
difference9% is not a ne" charge- humanistic geographies and non2representational theories have
both faced similar accusations +Dnderson and !arrison /0(0- (1> also see *ash /000> Saldahana%
/00?> Aolia2Kelly /00F,.
Ds urban exploration literatures inevitably mature% one of the ey 5uestions should surely
be not to disregard collective inscriptions such as gender% but rather to loo to ho" feminists%
post2colonial scholars and 5ueer theorists have sought to 5uery ho" it is that the durabilities of
orderings% such as race or gender emerge from the heterogeneous elements that compose them.
-
8/13/2019 Garrett and Hawkins, 2013, And now for something completely different: Thinking through explorers subject-bodies, Antipode.
10/22
!o" sexed difference% for example% becomes a 5uestion of exploring 6the complex yet concrete
materialities immersed in social relations of po"er9 +Braidotti /0(/- /(,% these obdurate
categories coming to be understood as assemblages 6formed from "ithin heterogeneous
materialities of bodies% technologies and places9 +Dnderson and !arrison /0(0- (M,. Ao engage
"ith this idea further% and find a footing% albeit tentatively% for a politics and an ethics that "ould
propagate from this understanding of the body2sub:ects of urban exploration "e "ant to turn to
consider some of the images that urban explorers create.
Affecti(e 'olitic" of the )i"u&l# %iru *im
Urban explorer and artist 'iru Kim a high2profile interlocutor bet"een urban exploration and
theorists of the aesthetics and critical social theori;ation of ruins +!a"ins /0(0a> !ell and
SchHnle /0(0,.MKims photography pivots around her deployment of her female form% often
nude% "ithin the lexicon of sites favored by urban explorers in cities around the "orld 2 from
*e" Pors sub"ays to London se"ers to the ruins of 3stanbul. &e do not have the space here to
conduct a full analysis of Kims photographic "or% and fully agree "ith 'ott and $oberts
observation of the need for a 6sustained critical treatment of the range of visual images produced
by urban explorers9 +p.=,% not least because of the need to appreciate these images as rather more
complex than 'ott and $oberts reductive description of them as 6invariably in a con5uering or
heroic mode9 +p.((, "ould allo". &hile such posturing is common% "e "ould assert that there
are varied visualities of urban exploration that can act as important sites for the production of
urban exploration politics.
8See Kims AE# tal- http-CC""".ted.comCtalsCmiruQimQsQundergroundQart.html+last accessed (< September
/0(1,. See also her "ebsite for examples of her images- http-CC""".miruim.comCstatement*aeditySpleen.php
+last accessed (< September /0(1,.
(0
http://www.ted.com/talks/miru_kim_s_underground_art.htmlhttp://www.ted.com/talks/miru_kim_s_underground_art.html -
8/13/2019 Garrett and Hawkins, 2013, And now for something completely different: Thinking through explorers subject-bodies, Antipode.
11/22
Kims compositions frame both the formal properties and teeming organic and inorganic
materialities of her sites. Ahrough her particular aesthetic sensibilities% especially in her use and
manipulation of chiaroscuro 2 the play of +natural and imported, light and dar at the sites 2 her
"or resonates "ith the visual regimes consciously or unconsciously adopted by many other
urban explorers. /0(1 for discussions in relation to geography,.
((
-
8/13/2019 Garrett and Hawkins, 2013, And now for something completely different: Thinking through explorers subject-bodies, Antipode.
12/22
tunnels% se"ers% catacombs% factories% hospitals% and shipyardsform the subconscious of the
city% "here collective memories and dreams reside.9((
Ahere are clear resonances here bet"een the possibilities of the psychoanalytic discussions that
'ott and $oberts signal% the metabolic urbanisms common to contemporary 'arxist urban
ecologies% and the urban body2politic of Gros; and others discussed above. &hat "e can find in
the visual regimes of Kims images is% "e "ould argue% a set of productive sub:ect2
environmental relations "ith a politics rather different than those of the 6hero shot9% the
overvie" image% or the body2maring2place landscape image% all of "hich can be traced from
earlier modes of colonial exploration into contemporary urban exploration imagery +#omosh
(
-
8/13/2019 Garrett and Hawkins, 2013, And now for something completely different: Thinking through explorers subject-bodies, Antipode.
13/22
6Experiencing feelings of alienation and anxiety in the city I a city that has increasingly become
more surveilled and commodified I 3 began to understand ho" many artists and authors suffered
from severe bouts of depression% inertia% and isolation...One of the "ays 3 escaped such feelings
"as to visit desolate and hidden places in the city. Every time 3 stepped out of the ordinary
aboveground spaces that "ere filled "ith anonymous cro"ds% 3 felt regenerated and
unrestrained.9(/
3n finding spaces "ithin the city that free her from particular forms of surveillance% modes of
practice and bodily consciousnesses% Kim echoes sentiments common to the explorer community
and to a raft of feminist scholars "ho have sought to complicate the city as a space of danger and
fear +&ilson (
-
8/13/2019 Garrett and Hawkins, 2013, And now for something completely different: Thinking through explorers subject-bodies, Antipode.
14/22
images. 3n rescotts +/0((, paper% referenced by 'ott and $oberts% "e find an interesting re2
appropriation of urban exploration imagery of ruined +often no" demolished, hospitals that
"ors along these lines. rescott% lining the medicali;ation of the birthing process "ith theories
of ruination% explores ho" urban exploration imagery offers a source of alternative sub:ect
positions for "omen "hose birthing experiences in these spaces had been traumatic or even left
in )ruins by the institutionali;ed birthing practices. &e "ould suggest rescotts analysis% lie
Kims images% form stepping stones to"ard a politics of urban exploration imagery that is based
not in actually being there% on doing exploration% but in the imaginative spaces these images open
out.
Ahis is a politics of urban exploration that lies in both "hat these images picture% but also
ho" they picture% ho" they do )"or as images after the shutter clic. &e are interested in "hat
Latham and 'cormac +/00
-
8/13/2019 Garrett and Hawkins, 2013, And now for something completely different: Thinking through explorers subject-bodies, Antipode.
15/22
particularities and more the very possibility of inhabiting% or occupying urban space beyond%
beside and "ithin forms presented to us for )appropriate use.
Conclu"ion# Tow&rd" &n Affirm&ti(e Criti+ue of ,rb&n Explor&tion
&e "ould lie once more to reiterate our thans to 'ott and $oberts for opening out an
important set of 5uestions around the politics of urban exploration. Ahis is valuable "or that
raises crucial issues at a time "hen the nascent geographical "or on urban exploration is
gathering pace. &hile "e tae a number of their points% "e are perhaps not in total agreement on
ho" to approach a critical engagement "ith the practice. &e "ould argue% as "e have hopefully
demonstrated% that there are multiple "ays in "hich one might be able to thin through a politics
for urban exploration that attends to difference.
Ahrough a re2visiting of ethnographic accounts of urban exploration and a discussion of
the possibilities and affective capacities of the imagery that urban explorers produce% "e have
sought to acno"ledge other routes by "hich 5uestions of difference in exploration might be
pursued. 3n doing so% "e identify t"o sites of politics that% "hilst they might be based in a
different understanding of difference than these engaged "ith by 'ott and $oberts% "e
nevertheless believe do offer productive points from "hich to move for"ard "ith thining about
urban exploration as a political practice. 'aing room for a fruitful feminist criti5ue that begins
less from 5uestions of 6cultural construction of sub:ectivity than in the materials out of "hich
such a construction is forged9 +Gros; (
-
8/13/2019 Garrett and Hawkins, 2013, And now for something completely different: Thinking through explorers subject-bodies, Antipode.
16/22
non2human and in2human forces and processes that exceed this corporeality in extensive%
intensive% temporal and ontogenetic "ays9 +'cormac /001- =M
-
8/13/2019 Garrett and Hawkins, 2013, And now for something completely different: Thinking through explorers subject-bodies, Antipode.
17/22
materials% and to academic and popular accounts of urban exploration to interrogate% "ith
perhaps greater vigilance than before% "hat forms of body2sub:ect are found there. Ahe results
"ere hopefully illuminating% raising "hat "e believe are critical concerns for ho" it is "e
understand urban exploration and connected political interventions into space.
October 2013
$eference"
Dnderson B and !arrison +/0(0, Ahe promise of non2representational theories. 3n B Dnderson
and !arrison +eds, Taking-Place !on-"epresentational Theories and #eography+pp(2
1=,. London- Dshgate
Bennett L +/0((a, Bunerology- D case study in the theory and practice of urban exploration.
$nvironment and Planning % &ociety and &pace/
-
8/13/2019 Garrett and Hawkins, 2013, And now for something completely different: Thinking through explorers subject-bodies, Antipode.
18/22
-
8/13/2019 Garrett and Hawkins, 2013, And now for something completely different: Thinking through explorers subject-bodies, Antipode.
19/22
$oyal !ollo"ay% University of London
Garrett B L +/0((d, Shallo" excavation- D response to )Bunerology. (0 June
http-CCsocietyandspace.comC/0((C0FC(0Cshallo"2excavation2a2response2to2bunerology2
by2bradley2l2garrettC +last accessed (( *ovember /0(1,
Garrett B L +/0(/, Edge"or- Getting close% getting cut% getting out. 3n Ahe State +eds, The
&tate' *ol &pec)lative #eographies#ubai- Ahe State
Garrett B L +/0(1a,$plore $verything Place-acking the (ity London- erso
Garrett B L +/0(1b, Ahe affectual affordances of industrial urban exploration. 3n ! Orange and S
enrose +eds,"eanimating nd)strial &paces&alnut ree- Left oast ress
Garrett B L +/0(1c, Undertaing recreational trespass- Urban exploration and infiltration.
Transactions of the nstit)te of .ritish #eographers !O3-(0.((((Ctran.(/00(
Garrett B L and !a"ins ! +forthcoming, reative video ethnographies- ideo methodologies
not methods. 3n Bates +ed, *ideo ,ethods
Genoso G +/00
-
8/13/2019 Garrett and Hawkins, 2013, And now for something completely different: Thinking through explorers subject-bodies, Antipode.
20/22
!a"ins ! +/0(1,+or (reative #eographies #eography' *is)al Arts' and the ,aking of
5orlds London- $outledge
!ell J and SchHnle D +eds, +/0(0,")ins of ,odernity %)rham- #ue University ress
!igh S and Le"is # & +/00, (orporate 5asteland 3thaca- ornell University ress
Jacobs J and *ash +/001, Aoo little% too much- ultural feminist geographies. #ender' Place
and ()lt)re(0-/F?2/