future fuels - algae - university of texas at austin

61
1 Future Fuels - Algae Norman M. Whitton ChE 359/384 6 November 2008

Upload: others

Post on 04-Feb-2022

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

1

Future Fuels - Algae

Norman M. WhittonChE 359/3846 November 2008

Page 2: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

2

Norm Whitton

BChE, BChem, Univ of Minn 1982MBA, Univ of Houston, 1985Petroleum and Chemical Industry

12 years at Conoco and DuPontManagement Consulting

10 years at Arthur D. LittleEntrepreneur

4 years starting new businesses in oil, refining and biodiesel

Algae Entrepreneur3 years in Austin, collaborating with University of Texas

Page 3: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

3

Sunrise Ridge Operations

University of TexasAlgae selection / cultureSpecies engineering Separation

City of AustinPilot plant sitePotential expansion

State of TexasETF investment

Page 4: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

4

Future Fuels - Algae

Commodity Production of AlgaeThe Promise of AlgaePhotosynthesisGeneric Production ProcessesAlgae SpeciesCommodity Products

Current State of TechnologyEnvironmental and Regulatory IssuesEconomic Feasibility ModelsQuestion and Answers

Page 5: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

5

How Fast ? How Bad?

Page 6: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

6

Peak Oil 3Q2005 – Cantarell Field

Page 7: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

7

More Problems

Page 8: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

8

Renewable Liquid Fuels

Page 9: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

9

Page 10: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

10

Why We Like Algae

Doesn’t compete with food

Reduces greenhouse gas

Does not require arable land, rain or irrigation

Oil Yield, Gal / Acre / Year

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

Future Algae

AlgaePalm

Jatropha

RapeSoy

Sunrise Ridge Technology Focus

Page 11: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

11

Algae – Drive Train Compatibility

Algal Oil – Conventional Diesel Drive TrainsPotentially compatible with existing liquid fuel industryCrude oil pipelinesBiodiesel or traditional petroleum refineriesProduce diesel fuel, which is in short supply worldwideWide application in trucks, cars, rail, ships; possibly to aircraftLittle or no change required for end-users

Page 12: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

12

Value Chain

Oil FieldOil Field RefineryBlending and Distribution

Animal Feed Mill

Biodiesel Plant

Algae FarmAlgae Farm

OilOil

ByProductByProduct

Page 13: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

13

Photosynthesis

1-3% efficient

Page 14: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

14

Photosynthesis

BiomassH2O + CO2 + ~8-10 hv (CH2O) + O2

Redfield Ratio106 Carbon

16 Nitrogen1 Phosphorus

Silicon (diatoms)

Page 15: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

15

Micronutrients

Page 16: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

16

Cell Division and Growth

Exponential Growth

Typically matched to diurnal cycleOne to six divisions per day (doublings)

Exponential

Stationary

Lag

Time

Cul

ture

Den

sity

Page 17: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

17

Solar Algae Production Process

Species + Nutrients

Water

Solar Algae Farm

Separations &

Processing

Waste Treatment

Product LogisticsCO2

Page 18: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

18

Fermentation Processes

Species + Nutrients

Water

Dark Algae Tanks

Separations &

Processing

Waste Treatment

Product LogisticsSugar

Page 19: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

19

CO2 - Electric Conversion

Species + Nutrients

Water

Algae PBR

Separations &

Processing

Waste Treatment

Product LogisticsCO2

Electric Lights (LEDs)

Page 20: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

20

Algae Species• Estimated fifty thousand to hundreds of thousands of species• High genetic diversity, rapid mutation rates• Ubiquitous• Range in size from 2 microns (cyanobacteria) to macro (kelp)

Page 21: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

21

Algae Species

Neochloris alveroteras

Botryococcus brauneiiAnkistrodesmus arcuatus

Page 22: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

22

Cell Components• Cell walls and membranes

• Fatty acids• Sugar / protein binders• Silica (diatoms)• Not much cellulose

• Nucleus• Sugars and nucleic acids

• Proteins

• Pyrenoid• Starches and sugars

• Organelles• DNA, proteins, cell membranes

Page 23: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

23

Algae Products

HawaiiCalifornia (Salton Sea)New MexicoIsraelSoutheast Asia

Vitamins (A, B)Omega 3 Fatty AcidsDyesDrugs

TriglyceridesMixed OilsCarbohydratesProteins / Amino AcidsEthanol / Lactic AcidOther Chemical FeedstocksAnimal Feeds

Health supplementsSpirulinaChlorella

PigmentAstraxanthin

AquacultureSea bassShrimpMussels / Abalone

SpecialtiesCommoditiesCurrent

Page 24: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

24

Future Fuels - Algae

Commodity Production of AlgaeCurrent State of Technology

Algae Species Selection and EngineeringGreenhouse Systems (Open, Closed, Hybrid)DewateringProduct Separations

Environmental and Regulatory IssuesEconomic Feasibility ModelsQuestion and Answers

Page 25: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

25

Algae Selection

Local collectionAlgae culture collections

UT, Maryland, California, Hawaii, Japan, UKRapid screening and sequencingDesired properties

Oil productionGrowth rateSize / Harvesting Predator and disease resistance

Page 26: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

26

Oleaginous Green Algae (ASU)

Page 27: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

27

Genetic Engineering Targets

Solar efficiencyOil productionHarvesting Predator and disease resistance

ButMutation ratesEvolutionary success vs environment

Page 28: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

28

Growth Based on Temperature

Absorbance by Temperature

0.000

0.050

0.100

0.150

0.200

0.250

0.300

0.350

0.400

0.450

18.6

21.6

24.4

27.3

30.2

32.9

35.9

38.5

41.4

18.6

21.6

24.4

27.3

30.2

32.9

35.9

38.5

41.4

Neochloris oleoabundans Botryococcus braunii

Temperature (°C)

Abso

rban

ce Hour 0Hour 0Hour 45Hour 93

— Hour 0

— Hour 45

— Hour 93

UTEX #1230 Absorbance by Temperature

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

0.40

0.45

21.6° 25.6° 29.0° 32.5° 35.2° 38.6° 41.5° 44.2° 47.1°

#1230 Chlorella sorokiniana

Temperature (°C)

Abso

rban

ce

Hour 0Hour 19

Results•Strain 1 grew maximally at 30-33°C and growth ceased past 36°C•Strain 2 grew fast from 35-42°C and growth ceased past 45°C•Strain 3 grew well between 29-35°C and growth ceased past 39°C

AFC Absorbance by Temperature

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

21.6° 25.6° 29.0° 32.5° 35.2° 38.6° 41.5° 44.2° 47.1°

Algae Farm Chlorella

Temperature (°C)

Abso

rban

ce

Hour 0Hour 49

Page 29: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

29

“Greenhouse” Systems

Page 30: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

30

Ponds

Page 31: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

31

Raceways

Page 32: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

32

Horizontal Closed Systems

Page 33: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

33

Vertical Closed Systems

Page 34: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

34

Light Conversion

Page 35: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

35

Species Control Failures

Bi-Culture of our desired species + blue-green cyanobacteria (filaments)

Native species + Vorticella(predator)

Page 36: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

36

Species Control Strategies

Accept whatever falls inMake the environment specialized

SalinitypHTemperature

Closed greenhouse, physical barrierPeriodic sterilizationSmall, stable, symbiotic ecology

Page 37: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

37

System Productivity

ShadingEvaporative coolingHeated / chilled water

Physical barrierSterilization protocols

100-150Closed vertical system

MixedNutrient starvation20-40, but higher oil content

Hybrid

Evaporative cooling barrier gives longer growing seasonExternal evaporative cooling required in summer

Physical barrier Salinity pH

40-60 Closed horizontal system

NoneVia salinity or pH20Open Raceway with mixing and CO2 addition

NoneNone0-5High Rate PondCO2 addition

NoneNone0-2Natural pond

Temperature ControlSpecies Controlg / m2 / dType

Page 38: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

38

Dewatering

“It looks like green paint to me!”

Page 39: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

39

Too much cost…

Page 40: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

40

New Tech Harvesting – Fish Poo

Page 41: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

41

Lysing

Page 42: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

42

“Traditional” Extraction

Page 43: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

43

Oil Content & Quality

Page 44: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

44

Other Conversion Options

AcidolysisFermentationGasificationDrying / PelletingAnaerobic Digestion

Page 45: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

45

Future Fuels - Algae

Commodity Production of AlgaeCurrent State of TechnologyEnvironmental and Regulatory Issues

WaterSpeciesGenetic Engineering

Economic Feasibility ModelsQuestion and Answers

Page 46: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

46

Water Issues

Saline systemsMake up water sourcesSaline water disposal

Non-saline systemsMake up waterDischarge to aquifer / aquifer qualityDischarge permits (nutrients N, P)

Large-scale farm disturbance of surface flow and aquifer recharge

Page 47: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

47

Non-native species

Invasive “pests”Texas “black list” regulations – Parks & WildlifeGlobal transportMutation and adaptationProving “Harm”Proposed “white list” regulation

Page 48: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

48

Genetically Engineered Species

Fitness improving featuresGrowth ratesPredator resistanceToxics

Fitness reducing featuresOil contentOther “toxic” productsProduct export outside the cell

Testing?Deployment?

Page 49: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

49

More regulation issuesDownstream solvent extraction / processing emissions & wastePlastic recyclingLand use and zoning

“Look and feel” of the farmsFlat land is relatively scarce – how to use contour?

Radio waves / spectrum for radio-controlled equipment in the farms

Page 50: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

50

Future Fuels - Algae

Commodity Production of AlgaeCurrent State of TechnologyEnvironmental and Regulatory IssuesEconomic Feasibility ModelsQuestion and Answers

Page 51: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

51

Challenges…

Cost: Commodity products from algae have relatively low value We must be very low in cost (capital and operating)

Scale: Sunlight is a dilute source of energy; and it’s variable We need enormous scale to make a difference (1 MMBPD ~ 1-2,000,000 acres)

Yields: Algae convert 3-4% of sunlight to biomass, which might be only 30%-40% oil.Our production systems need to maximize desirable products and revenues.

Page 52: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

52

More challenges…

Siting:Microclimates and repeatabilityCO2 source?Water and nutrients source?Land – and lots of itGet everyone to agree without destroying the project

Page 53: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

53

Orders of Magnitude…

Page 54: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

54

Page 55: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

55

Page 56: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

56

Techno-Economics - Assumptions

Revenue / PricesOil prices $40 – 200 / bblCarbon credits $2 – 40 / tonByproduct values $30 – 300 / ton

YieldsBiomass production rate 25 – 200 g / m2 / dayOil content 3% to >60%

Costs“Greenhouse” $0.50 - >$10 psfSeparations 0.02 - $20 / gal (product)Feedstocks / Inputs Site and process specific

Page 57: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

57

Techno-Economics - Targets

Based on our models for an “interesting”project at reasonable revenue assumptionsTargets include:

Biomass yields > 75 g / m2 / day ANDOil yields > 30%

Greenhouse cost < $2.00 psf, all in ANDSeparation cost <0.40 / gal oil, all in ANDByproduct is recovered and sold at feed value

Page 58: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

58

Target Markets

Price,$/Ton

Size, $Bn / yr

Renewable Diesel (2015)

45% Protein

1000

500

10 0 10

Vegetable OilVegetable Oil5050--70% Revenue70% Revenue

Animal FeedAnimal Feed3030--50% Revenue50% Revenue

Bio

dies

el

Ole

oche

m

65%

Pro

tein

0

Page 59: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

59

Challenges to Algae Commercialization

Techno-economicsObtaining InputsEffective OperationsObtaining PermitsPenetrating MarketsCreating Confidence

How do we make it happen?

How do we How do we make it make it happen?happen?

Page 60: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

60

Page 61: Future Fuels - Algae - University of Texas at Austin

61

Future Fuels - Algae

Commodity Production of AlgaeCurrent State of TechnologyEnvironmental and Regulatory IssuesEconomic Feasibility ModelsQuestion and Answers