fundamentals of hydronic system design
TRANSCRIPT
1
Fundamentals of Hydronic System Design
May 8, 2009ASHRAE Region 6
Chapters Region Conference
Mark HegbergProduct Manager, Danfoss Heating Controls
Agenda
1. “Short Class”1. Very Fundamental
2. You take notes
2. General Class Flow1. Design Problem
2. System Design & Calculation
3. Pump selection
4. Control & System Balance
5. Advanced Concepts
Daniel Bernoulli Bernoulli Equation
Z1
Z2
P2
P1
V1
V2
HL
L2
222
21
12
11 H
ρ
P
2g
Vz
ρ
P
2g
Vz
2
Bernoulli’s Equation...
• Elevation - Potential Energy Of The System, Lifting The Fluid
• Fluid Velocity: Kinetic Energy and Effects of Gravity
• Pressure & Density: Flow Energy Work Done On Surroundings By Fluid
LossHeadH
DensityFluidρ
PressureP
PipeIn Velocity Fluid2g
V
ElevationZ
L
2
Pressure Units
PerfectVacuum
StandardAtmospheric
Pressure
14.7 PSIAor
0 PSIG
0 PSIAor
-? PSIG
DifferenceIn Length
Units:• Inches• Feet• Millimeters• Meters
Liquid Fill• Water• Oil• Mercury
StationarySocket
PressureConnection
BourdonTube
Sector& Pinion
Link
PointerGearHair
Spring
3
Pressure
Or: 0.433 psi / Ft.
• Or Another Way Of Looking At It;
2
2
3 In144Ft1
FtLb.62.34
1'
1'1'
Water62.34 Lb
12"
12"
PSI1Ft2.31
or Ft
InLb.
0.443 2
• A 231 Foot Long Manometer Is Inconvenient for Measuring 100 PSI, and In The Old Days A Common Dense Fluid Was Mercury...
2
2
3 In144Ft1
FtLb.844.87
1'
1'1'
Mercury844.87 Lb
12"
12"
PSI1HgIn2.04
or PSI1
Ft0.17or
FtInLb.
5.87 2
PerfectVacuum
StandardAtmospheric
Pressure
14.7 PSIAor
0 PSIG
0 PSIAor
-? PSIG
≈30 In Hg
4
PerfectVacuum
StandardAtmospheric
Pressure
14.7 PSIAor
0 PSIG
0 PSIAor
-? PSIG
≈30 In Hg
PerfectVacuum
StandardAtmospheric
Pressure
11 PSIA
HgIn21
7PSIHgIn
2.04inLb
11inLb
14.7 22
Pressure
• For this class our reference will be;
Static Pressure
• Static Pressure Is The Elevation
• It’s Created By The Weight Of A Vertical Column Of Water
5
And That Other Unit of Measure? Feet of Head
Feet of Head
• Remember Bernoulli Really Described Energy• Pumps Do "Work" On The Water• Work Is Measured In Ft-Lbs• Water Is Measured In Pounds
LbLb-Ft
Why Use Pump Head?
Water @ 60 F Water @ 200 F Water @ 300 F
Density = 62.34 lbs/cu ft62.34 144 = 0.43 psi/ft2.3 ft / psi30 ft X .43psi/ft =12.9psi12.9 psi X 2.3 ft/psi = 30 ft
Density = 60.13 lbs/cu ft60.13 144 = 0.41 psi/ft2.44 ft / psi30 ft X .41psi/ft =12.3psi12.3 psi X 2.44 ft/psi = 30 ft
Density = 57.31 lbs/cu ft57.31 144 = 0.40 psi/ft2.5 ft / psi30 ft X .40psi/ft =12.0psi12.0 psi X 2.5 ft/psi = 30 ft
92.9 psi 92.3 psi 92.0 psi
80.0 psi 80.0 psi 80.0 psi
P=12.9 P=12.3 P=12.0
Pump Rated For 30 Ft Head @ Flow
6
Review
• Pumps Do The Work: They Add Energy To the Fluid System
– We “Pump” Pounds of Fluid
– Work Measured In Foot-Pounds
– Foot-Pounds of Work Per Pound Fluid Pumped
• Pounds Cancel; We’re Left With Feet or “Head”
• “Density Independent”
• Three Components To Total Head (Work)
– Elevation, Velocity, Pressure
• Work Done on System Components
– Head or Pressure Losses
Design Problem
• Three Story Building
– Four Zones Per Floor
– Each Zone 14 Tons Air Conditioning
– 168 Total Tons
– Evaluate at Constant Entering Air 78½°F DB, 65½°F WB
– 42°F EWT, 16 ½°F ΔT
Develop “Flat” Layout
7
How Does It Work?
SourcePipes
CoilPump
Air Management
• Adds Heat• Rejects Heat• Changes Water
Temperature• BTU/Hour
• Pipes & Coils Provide “Resistance” You Use Energy In Form of Pressure To Move Water
• Air Is In Water, and Goes Into and Comes Out Of Solution As A Function Of Pressure & Temperature
• Pumps Provide Differential Pressure By Converting Electrical Energy To Move Water
Closed Loop Hydronic System Design Method
1. Calculate Facility Load Set Space Design Criteria
Building Code Requirements
ASHRAE Requirements Standard 62.2; Air/Ventilation Requirements
Standard 90.1; Energy
Standard 55; Thermal Comfort
Standard 111; Test & Balance
Guideline 1; Commissioning
Examine Load Requirements Zone Distribution
HVAC Method
Diversity; Do Not Use Diversity When Sizing Pipes & Pumps
System Load
• ASHRAE’s Latest: 1998 “Cooling & Heating Load Calculation Principles” (RP-875) Pedersen, Fisher, Spitler, Liesen
• Air Conditioning Contractors of America
• Manufacturer Load Programs
– System Load
– Block Load
• “Old” Carrier Manual “Engineering Guide for System Design” (1963)
• ASHRAE’s Latest: 1998 “Cooling & Heating Load Calculation Principles” (RP-875) Pedersen, Fisher, Spitler, Liesen
• Air Conditioning Contractors of America
• Manufacturer Load Programs
– System Load
– Block Load
• “Old” Carrier Manual “Engineering Guide for System Design” (1963)
System Impacts
• Heat Transfer Becomes Water Flow
– Over Estimation Causes Over Calculation of Flow
– Energy Efficiency Impacted
– Leads To Bigger Coils & Oversized Control Valves
• Controllability Impacted
• Changes Desired Coil Performance
8
2. Select Heat Transfer Devices Source; Desired System Operating Differential
Temperature Load; Coil that offers required performance at
calculated gain conditions Heating, Cooling & De-Humidification Operating system differential temperature
3. Calculate and “Analyze” System Flows Total System Flow Zone Flow Can the required operating differential temperature
be achieved? Alternative piping and pumping considerations
Closed Loop Hydronic System Design Method Calculate Flow
• Flow
TFlow500Q
)T(TFlb
Btu1GPM
hrmin
60gallb.
8.34Q
ΔTcmQ
EntLvgm
P
Required Water Flow
• 80 GPM / Floor
• 240 GPM Building
gpm2016.5500
12,000)(14q
16.5q50012,000)(14
! Tq500Q
System SyzerThank You! Scott Blackmore & B&G
• Scale 1• Align 16½°F ΔT• 168(,000)• Read Flow
9
20 2020 20 20 20
20 2020 20 20 20
240
240
40
40
40
40
80
80
40
40
40
40
80
80
40
40
40
40
80
80
160 80
160 80
Hydronic Coil Heat Transfer
• Air Side Heat Transfer
Where LMTD is the air-water log mean temperature difference
• Water Side Heat Transfer
Where t is the water temperature rise
q UA LMTD ( ) q=mcp(t2-t1)
2 Pipe Control
T
CM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Alt 1
20°ΔT
Alt 2
60°ΔT
Hot Water Coil Heat TransferPerformance Vs. Water Side ΔT
Hot Water Coil Heat TransferPerformance Vs. Water Side ΔT
% Water Flow
% H
eat
Tran
sfer
HotWaterCoil
75%Design Flow
97.5%Heat
Transfer
90%Design Flow
The coil performance is not linear
The coil performance is not linear
10
Coil Heat Transfer
Perc
enta
ge H
eat T
rans
fer
Percentage Water Flow Rate
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
4 Row Tot
4 Row Sens
4 Row Lat
5 Row Tot
5 Row Sens
5 Row Lat
6 Row Tot
6 Row Sens
6 Row Lat
100%
50%
0%
50%
100%
Total Heat Transfer
Sensible Heat Transfer
Latent Heat Transfer
General Coil Notes
• Traditionally, sensible heat transfer is controlled by throttling flow
• Coil performance tends to be non-linear– More non linear with low water ΔT (6ºF)
– More linear with higher water ΔT (16ºF)
• Coil pressure drop affects– Main & branch pipe sizing
– Control valve operation (valve authority)
– System balance
4. Schematically Design Piping
Select Terminals / Heat Transfer Coils
Component Drops
Note Coil Characteristic for Temperature Drop
Locate Terminals / Heat Transfer Coils
Address Area Fit Constraints
– Size of Unit
– Area of Application
Examine Piping Geography
Develop Pipe Sizing Criteria
Select Control Valve
Examine Valve Authority
General Notes: Air Bind
A B
Supply Main Return Main
3’
1½’
AirWater
• Adequate Operating Differential To Create Flow
11
General Notes: Air Bind
B
3’
1½’
AirWater
• Adequate Operating Differential To Create Flow
Supply Main Return Main
1’ Riser Water Level Displaced By 1’
ΔH A to B = 1’
B
General Notes: Air Bind
B
3’
Supply Main Return Main
ΔH A to B = 5’
B
General Notes: Air Bind
B
3’
Supply Main Return Main
ΔH A to B = 5’
B
Ensure Adequate Differential
High Pressure
Drop
Low Pressure Drop Low Pressure Drop
A
B
Supply Main
Return Main
ΔH
Potential For Air Binding
12
Avoid Ghost Flow Circuits
A
B
Open
Closed
Piping Configuration
• Single Pipe Systems
– Single Load
– Multiple Load
• Two Pipe Systems (Supply & Return)
– Constant Flow Single & Multiple Load
– Variable Flow Single & Multiple Load
• Hybrid Systems
– Bypass Systems
– Primary-Secondary-Tertiary
Single Pipe System
Advantages:
• Simple System!• Less Costly Piping
Disadvantages:
• Simple System!• Zone Temperature Control
Matched Tagged To Source Production
Single Pipe Grid Coil
A
• Depending On “T”Branch Loss
– General Guidance: “B”Length Should Be Twice That of “A”
– High Potential of Air Binding In Grid
– Raising Water Temperature To Compensate Causes Panel Flux To Be Too High
• Guidance: Intertwined Serpentine Coils (Most PexBased Systems Wind Up This Way)
B
13
Closed Loop Circulating System
Definition: Contact With Air At One Location Or Less
Definition: Elevation Differences Do Not Cause Flow
Two Pipe, Direct Return
Two Pipe Distribution System
Supply
Return
Riser (Main)
Riser (Main)
Branch
Old Balancing Technique;
• 2:1- BRPDR 90% design flow at all terminals
• 1:1- 80%
Advantages:
• Water Flow Is Variable– Saves Pump HP
• Water Coil Provides Better Control of Temperature & Humidity
• Temperature To Each Coil Is Constant Per Chiller
Disadvantages:
• Chiller Sees Variable Flow • Flow Through Coil Is
Throttled Creating Variable Return Water Temperature To Chiller
• Must Balance Coil Branches In Relation To Each Other
Two Pipe Variable FlowDistribution System
14
2 Pipe Direct Return Has Unequal Differential Pressures
Hea
d
Distance From Pump0
100%
ΔP2
ΔP3
ΔP1
Two Pipe Constant Flow Distribution System
Supply
Return
T
Advantages:
• Source Sees “Constant” Flow• Water Coil Provides Better
Control of Temperature & Humidity
• Temperature To Coil Is Constant Per Source
Disadvantages:
• Water Flow Is “Constant”• Flow Through Coil Is Throttled
Creating Variable Return Water Temperature To Source
• More Components: Valves• Must Balance Coil Bypass Pipe ΔP
Two Pipe Variable Flow Reverse Return System 2 Pipe Reverse Return Has More Equal Differential Pressures
Hea
d
Distance From Pump0
100%
ΔP1
ΔP2ΔP3
15
Applying Reverse Return
• Loads Should All Be Within 25% Of Each Other
• If Zone Control Is Used, All Branches Should
Be In Similar Zones
• You May Still Have To Balance System
Calculating Friction Head Loss
• hf = Energy Lost Through Friction Expressed As Fluid Feet Of Head, Feet Of Fluid Flowing
• f= Friction Factor
• L= Length Of Pipe
• D= Pipe Diameter
• V= Fluid Average Velocity, Ft/Sec (Flow / Pipe Area)
• g= gravitational constant
h fL
D
V
gf
2
2Darcy-Weisbach Eqn.
5. Size Piping & Calculate Drops Size Pipes In Branches First
2-10 FPS / 1’-4.5’ P Per 100’ (Steel)
Determine Highest Branch Drop & Length Add Coil Drop
Valve Drop Equal To Coil & Pipe or PICV pressure drop
Select Branch To Riser Pressure Drop Ratio
Calculate Mains Divide Worst Branch PD By Ratio, and Then 2 (S&R)
Divide Riser Total Drop By Pipe Length (Target Design Rate)
Examine Target Rate
– Within ASHRAE Guidelines
– Enough Pipe Length vs. TEL Of Fittings
Size Risers
Calculate System & Branch Drops
Design Criteria For Balanced Piping
Examine Pressure Drops Closely For Hydronic Balance
– Branch To Riser Pressure Drop Ratio Helps System Balance In Tolerance
• 4:1 95% Design Flow All Circuits
• 2:1 90% Design Flow
• 1:1 80% Design Flow
• Constant Speed Pump
• Issues
– Equipment Room Piping
– Variable Speed
16
20 2020 20 20 20
20 2020 20 20 20
240
240
40
40
40
40
80
80
40
40
40
40
80
80
40
40
40
40
80
80
160 80
160 80
Sour
ce
100’ 20’ 20’
20’20 20
20 20
240 GPM 40
40 GPM
80 GPM
80
160 80
Sour
ce
100’ 20’ 20’
30’30’
30’
30’ 30’
30’
40 GPM
30’30’ 30’
30’ 30’
40 GPM
40 GPM30’
30’
30’
240 GPM 160 80
100’ 20’ 20’
A
B C 1
2
3
89
5
7
12
46
1011
DE
F
Segment A B C 1-2 2-3 3-4-6 3-5-6 6-7 2-8 8-10-11 8-9-11 11-7 7-12 D E F
Flow
Size
Length
HF Rate
HF Friction Loss
Fittings
Service Valves
Coil
Control Valve
Balance Valve
Source
Total
Path Path Total
A-1-2-3-4-6-7-12-F
A-1-2-3-5-6-7-12-F
A-1-2-8-10-11-7-12-F
A-1-2-8-9-11-7-12-F
A-B-1-2-3-4-6-7-12-E-F
A-B-1-2-3-5-6-7-12-E-F
A-B-1-2-8-10-11-7-12-E-F
A-B-1-2-8-9-11-7-12-E-F
A-B-C-1-2-3-4-6-7-12-D-E-F
A-B-C-1-2-3-5-6-7-12-D-E-F
A-B-C-1-2-8-10-11-7-12-D-E-F
A-B-C-1-2-8-9-11-7-12-D-E-F
Calculate Friction Losses
• Know Length Of Pipe
– Work Darcy-Weisbach Equation
– Use Design Tool
• Count Fittings
– Example: I’m applying stock head loss
– You In Practice: Don’t do this!
• Determine Branch & Riser Losses
– Coils, Specialty Devices
– Trying To Get Rough Cut for Control & Balance Valves
17
Copper Pipe Friction Loss
Volumetric Flow Rate, GPM
Hea
d L
oss
Due
To
Fric
tion
, Ft.
Per 1
00 F
t. Pi
pe
Friction Loss Charts
• Published by ASHRAE & Hydraulic Institute
• D/W Eqn.
Add 15%!Add 15%!
Scale 2 Pipe SizingScale 3 Velocity Check
2”
3¼
18
2”
3.6
Pipe Sizes½”-2”
Fitting Loss PictogramFitting Pressure Loss
• Variety of Fitting Loss Methodologies
Accuracy Varies Widely
Elbow Equivalents (Least Accurate)
Total Equivalent Length
“K” Factor (Current ASHRAE Recommendation)
Hf = KV2
2g
19
Fitting Pressure Loss How Do Fitting Drops Stack Up?
2” 90° Steel Elbow (K=1)
• 1961 H/I TEL 8.5’
• ASHRAE - H/I “K” Factor
• ASHRAE RP-968– (Rahmeyer); K Factor varies
widely as a function of velocity
>11
FPS
TEL “K”
% TEL hfOver“K”
Rahmeyer “K”
GPM K2
% K hfOverK2 hf
.04
.07
.11
.15
.20
.26
.33
.391.9
1520253035404550
116
<3F
PS
hf hf
.505
.535
.535
.543
.552
.561.57
.626.71
.03
.03
.09
.13
.17
.23
.29
.351.91
261272418151515100
98-1851565755534541
SEGMENT A B C 1-2 2-3 3-4-6 3-5-6 6-7 2-8 8-10-11 8-9-11 11-7 7-12 D E FFlow 240 160 80 80 40 20 20 40 40 20 20 40 80 80 160 240Size 4" 3" 2.5" 2.5 1.5 1.25 1.25 1.5 1.5 1.25 1.25 1.5 2.5 2.5" 3" 4"
Length 100' 20' 20' 30 30 60 60 30 30 60 60 30 30 20' 20' 100'HF Rate 3 5.5 4.5 4.5 12.5 9 9 12.5 12.5 9 9 12.5 4.5 4.5 5.5 3
Friction Loss 3 1.1 0.9 1.35 3.75 5.4 5.4 3.75 3.75 5.4 5.4 3.75 1.35 0.9 1.1 3Fittings 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Service Valves 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Coil 17 17 17 17
Control ValveBalance Valve
Source 30Total 5 3.1 2.9 3.35 7.75 26.4 26.4 7.75 7.75 26.4 26.4 7.75 5.35 4.9 5.1 37
PATHTOTAL
A-1-2-3-4-6-7-12-F 5 3.35 7.75 26.4 7.75 5.35 37 92.6A-1-2-3-5-6-7-12-F 5 3.35 7.75 26.4 7.75 5.35 37 92.6
A-1-2-8-10-11-7-12-F 5 3.35 7.75 26.4 7.75 5.35 37 92.6A-1-2-8-9-11-7-12-F 5 3.35 7.75 26.4 7.75 5.35 37 92.6
A-B-1-2-3-4-6-7-12-E-F 5 3.1 3.35 7.75 26.4 7.75 5.35 5.1 37 100.8A-B-1-2-3-5-6-7-12-E-F 5 3.1 3.35 7.75 26.4 7.75 5.35 5.1 37 100.8
A-B-1-2-8-10-11-7-12-E-F 5 3.1 3.35 7.75 26.4 7.75 5.35 5.1 37 100.8A-B-1-2-8-9-11-7-12-E-F 5 3.1 3.35 7.75 26.4 7.75 5.35 5.1 37 100.8
A-B-C-1-2-3-4-6-7-12-D-E-F 5 3.1 2.9 3.35 7.75 26.4 7.75 5.35 4.9 5.1 37 108.6A-B-C-1-2-3-5-6-7-12-D-E-F 5 3.1 2.9 3.35 7.75 26.4 7.75 5.35 4.9 5.1 37 108.6
A-B-C-1-2-8-10-11-7-12-D-E-F 5 3.1 2.9 3.35 7.75 26.4 7.75 5.35 4.9 5.1 37 108.6A-B-C-1-2-8-9-11-7-12-D-E-F 5 3.1 2.9 3.35 7.75 26.4 7.75 5.35 4.9 5.1 37 108.6
• Organize through spreadsheet Moving Towards Pump Selection…
• Friction Losses Unaccounted for;
– Control Valve
• Need to understand “controls”
– Balance Valve
• Need to understand “balance”
– Suction Diffuser
• Should understand pumps
– Pump Discharge Valve(s)
• Should understand pumps and systems
20
Room Air Re-circulated
BlowerCoil
Add Valves
Automated Control
Unit Heater
Hot Water
Heated Room Controller
Control Signal
Actuator
Automated Control
The controller output signal acts in a proportional manner to the difference in the actual from the desired temperature
adding what is lost
The controller output signal acts in a proportional manner to the difference in the actual from the desired temperature
adding what is lost
Energy is lost proportionally to
the outside temperature
q = UA(Ti-TO)
Energy is lost proportionally to
the outside temperature
q = UA(Ti-TO)
CoilBlowerProcess
ManipulateWaterFlow
Disturbances
ControlTemperature
Theory
• Solar• Change Weather• People
Heat Gains
21
CoilBlowerProcess
ManipulateWaterFlow
Disturbances
ControlTemperature
Theory
Heat Gains
Water FlowAir Flow
• Unaccounted for Changes In Differential Head
• Friction Head Loss Distribution
• Pressure Control Dynamics
A Fairly Simple Concept...
• We control for comfort as indicated by temperature
– Humidity Control “Implied” By Coil Selection
• Various levels of implementation
– Economic Criteria
– Process Criteria
– Paradigm Criteria
Proportional Control
KSP +
MV -
e KeOutputSignal
“Control Theory”
Outp
ut
0-1
0 V
DC
SP
t0-10 VDC
Control Signal
Room Controller
Actuated Valve
Proportional Control
Room Controller
Actuated Valve
y
Outp
ut
0-1
0 V
DC
SP
t
eError
e - Error
Linear
Resp
onse
0-10 VDCControl Signal
22
Proportional Control
Outp
ut
0-1
0 V
DC
SP
t0-10 VDC
Control Signal
Room Controller
Actuated Valve
y
y
(y-yi)=K(t-ti)y = Valve Positionyi = Initial Valve Positiont = Temperatureti = Initial TemperatureK = Constant (gain)
Traditional 2 Way Valve Temperature Control
• Controller controls because response is predictable
• Variable coil flow
• Variable system flow
• “Why” variable speed pumping can be used
T
CM
Valve Characteristic
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
% Valve Lift
% B
ran
ch
Flo
w
Quick Opening
Linear
Equal Percentage
• ASHRAE Research (RP-5) Boiled It Down To This
– Just About Every HVAC Text On Valves Uses This Type of Figure
– The Coil Gain (Proportional Band) Isn’t the Same As The Controllers… Why We Use An Equal Percentage Valve
Source: ASHRAE Handbook
Coil Characteristic Valve CharacteristicControlledRelationship
Gain
Gai
nGain
Gain
23
Linear Stem Valves (Globe)
To Select Properly;
• Required Flow Rate (GPM)
• Select Differential Pressure– Magnitude Depends On;
• Control; Open-Closed/Modulating
• Hydraulic Design Philosophy; Balanced, Unbalanced, Branch & Riser Pressure Drops
• Pump Control; Constant vs. Variable Speed
• Required Valve Authority
– Consider Characteristic Requirement
Coil
Controllability ~ Constants
• Constant Differential Pressure Keeps Predictable Flow Characteristic
TC Valve Throttle In
Here 90% Time
1%
8%
Adjustment
0
25
50
75
100
0 25 50 75 100
PO
SIT
ION
OF
CO
NTRO
LLED
DEVIC
E%
OF
STRO
KE
CONTROLLED VARIABLE% OF CONTROLLER SCALE
0% 10% 100%THROTTLING %Proportional Action • Two Position
Room
Tem
per
atu
reVal
ve P
ositio
n Open
SetPoint
24
Proportional Action • Proportional Positioning
Room
Tem
per
atu
reVal
ve P
ositio
n Open
SetPointOffset
Closed
Valve Description
• Many terms describe valves
• Flow Coefficient
– CV
– Rangeability
Control Valve Integration
0
25
50
75
100
0 25 50 75 100
% O
F FL
OW
% OF VALVESTROKE
EQUAL PERCENTAGE CHARACTERISTIC
y
Flow Coefficient
SG
ΔPCq V
25
Flow Coefficient
SG
ΔPCq V
)t500(tqQ lvgent Heat Transfer
FlowWater = 1
Units = PSI
Calculate DesiredLive with Available
Rangeability
• With & W/O Actuator
• Without Actuator, 30:1
• With Actuator, 100+:1
• Globe Valves “De-Facto”Standard
• Ball Valve…
FlowMinFlowMax
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% 140%
MaximumValve Stroke
Coil Characteristic
Eq%
Cha
ract
eris
tic
50%
Aut
hori
ty
Cont
rol C
hara
cter
istic
The Goal; Make the red line straight and 100% to 100%Authority
• Valve authority affects controllability
• The Controller cannot control properly = PMIN / PMAX
PENT
PLVG
PMINPMAX
Supp
ly
Retu
rn
26
Valve Authority
Constant Flow Coefficient Pipe Coil Service Valves Balancing Valves
Variable: Control Valve
Supply
Ret
urn
CV2 CV2CV1
2V2
2V1
V2V1VSYS
CC
CCC
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
% Valve Lift
% B
ran
ch
Flo
w
Valve Specification• Modified Equal Percentage Valve• Globe Pattern• 2” Size• 30:1 Rangeability
Valve Specification• Modified Equal Percentage Valve• Globe Pattern• 2” Size• 30:1 Rangeability
β=
1.0
β=
.50
β=
.3β=
.1
Valve Characteristic and Authority
Selection
• Required Flow Rate (GPM)
• Select Differential Pressure
– Magnitude Depends On;
• Control; Open-Closed/Modulating
• Hydraulic Design Philosophy; Balanced, Unbalanced, Branch & Riser Pressure Drops
• Pump Control; Constant vs. Variable Speed
• Required Valve Authority
– Consider Characteristic Requirement
• Solve Algebraically
Hea
d
Distance From Pump0
100%
ΔP1+ΔP2 ΔP2 ΔP3
Understand Hydraulics
ΔP1
ΔP2
27
Balance Valve
• Temperature Control Valves– Electronically Actuated
– Characteristic for control
• Temperature Control Valves Require Balancing Valves– “Static”; “Circuit Setter”: Constant
speed flat curve pumping systems with “low” head loss distribution systems
– “Dynamic” or Automatic Flow Limiting; Variable Speed Variable Flow Pumping Systems
Static Balancing Valve
Dynamic Balancing Valve Cartridge
Considering Our Example
Balance:
– Farthest Circuit (Highest Head Loss) 108.6’
– Middle Circuit; 100.8’ – About 8’ required to balance
– Closest Circuit; 92.6’ – About 16’ required to balance
Control Valve:
– 50% Authority means 108’ (47 psi) selection pressure drop! A 216 foot head pump!!
Options:
– ?
SEGMENT A B C 1-2 2-3 3-4-6 3-5-6 6-7 2-8 8-10-11 8-9-11 11-7 7-12 D E FFlow 240 160 80 80 40 20 20 40 40 20 20 40 80 80 160 240Size 4" 3" 2.5" 2.5 1.5 1.25 1.25 1.5 1.5 1.25 1.25 1.5 2.5 2.5" 3" 4"
Length 100' 20' 20' 30 30 60 60 30 30 60 60 30 30 20' 20' 100'HF Rate 3 5.5 4.5 4.5 12.5 9 9 12.5 12.5 9 9 12.5 4.5 4.5 5.5 3
Friction Loss 3 1.1 0.9 1.35 3.75 5.4 5.4 3.75 3.75 5.4 5.4 3.75 1.35 0.9 1.1 3Fittings 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Service Valves 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Coil 17 17 17 17
Control ValveBalance Valve
Source 30Total 5 3.1 2.9 3.35 7.75 26.4 26.4 7.75 7.75 26.4 26.4 7.75 5.35 4.9 5.1 37
PATHTOTAL
A-1-2-3-4-6-7-12-F 5 3.35 7.75 26.4 7.75 5.35 37 92.6A-1-2-3-5-6-7-12-F 5 3.35 7.75 26.4 7.75 5.35 37 92.6
A-1-2-8-10-11-7-12-F 5 3.35 7.75 26.4 7.75 5.35 37 92.6A-1-2-8-9-11-7-12-F 5 3.35 7.75 26.4 7.75 5.35 37 92.6
A-B-1-2-3-4-6-7-12-E-F 5 3.1 3.35 7.75 26.4 7.75 5.35 5.1 37 100.8A-B-1-2-3-5-6-7-12-E-F 5 3.1 3.35 7.75 26.4 7.75 5.35 5.1 37 100.8
A-B-1-2-8-10-11-7-12-E-F 5 3.1 3.35 7.75 26.4 7.75 5.35 5.1 37 100.8A-B-1-2-8-9-11-7-12-E-F 5 3.1 3.35 7.75 26.4 7.75 5.35 5.1 37 100.8
A-B-C-1-2-3-4-6-7-12-D-E-F 5 3.1 2.9 3.35 7.75 26.4 7.75 5.35 4.9 5.1 37 108.6A-B-C-1-2-3-5-6-7-12-D-E-F 5 3.1 2.9 3.35 7.75 26.4 7.75 5.35 4.9 5.1 37 108.6
A-B-C-1-2-8-10-11-7-12-D-E-F 5 3.1 2.9 3.35 7.75 26.4 7.75 5.35 4.9 5.1 37 108.6A-B-C-1-2-8-9-11-7-12-D-E-F 5 3.1 2.9 3.35 7.75 26.4 7.75 5.35 4.9 5.1 37 108.6
• Actually calculate and show all fittings and losses…SEGMENT A B C 1-2 2-3 3-4-6 3-5-6 6-7 2-8 8-10-11 8-9-11 11-7 7-12 D E F
Flow 240 160 80 80 40 20 20 40 40 20 20 40 80 80 160 240Size 4" 3" 2.5" 2.5 2 1.5 1.5 2 2 1.5 1.5 2 2.5 2.5" 3" 4"
Length 100' 20' 20' 30 30 60 60 30 30 60 60 30 30 20' 20' 100'HF Rate 3 5.5 4.5 4.5 3.25 3.75 3.75 3.25 3.25 3.75 3.75 3.25 4.5 4.5 5.5 3
Friction Loss 3 1.1 0.9 1.35 0.98 2.25 2.25 0.98 0.98 2.25 2.25 0.98 1.35 0.9 1.1 3Fittings
Service Valves
Coil 17 17 17 17Control ValveBalance Valve
Source 30Total 3 1.1 0.9 1.35 0.98 19.3 19.3 0.98 0.98 19.25 19.25 0.98 1.35 0.9 1.1 33
PATHTOTAL
A-1-2-3-4-6-7-12-F 3 1.35 0.98 19.3 0.98 1.35 33 59.9A-1-2-3-5-6-7-12-F 3 1.35 0.98 19.3 0.98 1.35 33 59.9
A-1-2-8-10-11-7-12-F 3 1.35 0.98 19.25 0.98 1.35 33 59.9A-1-2-8-9-11-7-12-F 3 1.35 0.98 19.25 0.98 1.35 33 59.9
A-B-1-2-3-4-6-7-12-E-F 3 1.1 1.35 0.98 19.3 0.98 1.35 1.1 33 62.1A-B-1-2-3-5-6-7-12-E-F 3 1.1 1.35 0.98 19.3 0.98 1.35 1.1 33 62.1
A-B-1-2-8-10-11-7-12-E-F 3 1.1 1.35 0.98 19.25 0.98 1.35 1.1 33 62.1A-B-1-2-8-9-11-7-12-E-F 3 1.1 1.35 0.98 19.25 0.98 1.35 1.1 33 62.1
A-B-C-1-2-3-4-6-7-12-D-E-F 3 1.1 2.9 1.35 0.98 19.3 0.98 1.35 0.9 1.1 33 65.9A-B-C-1-2-3-5-6-7-12-D-E-F 3 1.1 2.9 1.35 0.98 19.3 0.98 1.35 0.9 1.1 33 65.9
A-B-C-1-2-8-10-11-7-12-D-E-F 3 1.1 2.9 1.35 0.98 19.25 0.98 1.35 0.9 1.1 33 65.9A-B-C-1-2-8-9-11-7-12-D-E-F 3 1.1 2.9 1.35 0.98 19.25 0.98 1.35 0.9 1.1 33 65.9
• Upsize pipe; Ignore fitting & service valve losses• 40% Reduction in head• Why did we do this…
28
Control Valve
• We reduced head loss to 66’
• We want 50% Authority, so size valve for ____
– 66’ (28.6 PSI)
74.3C
2.3166
202.3166
CGPM20
! PCq
V
V
V
66’
3.75
System Syzer: Scale Five
Control Valve Selection
• Which one do you believe?
• Required CV = 3.75• Pipe Size = 1½”• Rules of Thumb
– One pipe size smaller– 5 PSI; CV = 9
Control Valve Selection
There is an awful lot that goes into understanding valve selection
– One valve isn’t necessarily better than another
– Long discussion on hydraulics
Remember we reduced pump head 40% only to have to double it for the control valve
– 108 Feet to 66 Feet to 132 Feet; Net result 24 foot increase
– Skipping a long introduction; Apply dynamic pressure compensating control valves (i.e. “PICV”) tp reduce required head losses, and factor back in estimates for fittings and service devices
• Selected on flow requirement
29
Pressure Independent Control Valves
Pressure Independent Control Valves
• Pressure is kept constant across temperature control orifice by modulating pressure regulator
Two Integrated Valves One Body
• Selection by flow rate
– 1½” valve has maximum flow of 44 GPM
• Differential pressure
– 2-5 PSI design head loss
– 2-50 PSI operating differential
• TC Valve always has 100% authority
– Integrated pressure regulator maintains set pressure
• May be easily adjustable
• Eliminates need for extraneous balancing valves
M
P1 P3P2
P1 P2 P3
Technology Changes…
• Problem is head loss
– Head loss is required for (standard) valves to work
• Still, “old” design guidance is good
– Proven
– Essential element was to drive down head loss i.e. make the system more energy efficient through larger pipe sizes…
– We can easily get to 110 feet, can also upsize main piping
• 240 GPM @ 110 -120 Ft.
• Pick a pump
30
What is a centrifugal pump?• Three Basic Components Motor
(Driver)
Volute Impeller
• Other Components Based On Design
Base
Coupler
Centrifugal Pumps
Volute
Impeller
Seal
Pump ShaftBearings
End Suction Pump
• Single Suction Impeller
• Broad Range of Flow
• HVAC Workhorse
Base Mounted
Close Coupled
End Suction Pump
Bell & Gossett Series 1510Bell & Gossett Series 1510
31
Line Mounted Pump Small Circulators…”Boosters”
• Concept of pumped HVAC goes back to 1920’s
• Transition from gravity hot water heating to forced circulation
• “Boosters”; industry workhorse until ’80s
• ≈ 100 GPM, 40 Ft.Bell & Gossett Series 100Bell & Gossett Series 100
Wet Rotor Circulator Pumps Range In Size Greatly!
5 GPM 15,000 GPM
Circulator
Double Suction Impeller
32
Why So Many Pumps?
•Function of Flow, Head, Speed, Impeller Profile, Force
•Application
– HVAC
– Wells
– Irrigation
– De-watering
– etc.
Bernoulli’s Theorem
a
b
P
WZ
V
g
P
WZ
V
ga
aa b
bb
2 2
2 2
The total head of a fluid at “a” is equal to the total head at “b”, provided that there’s no loss due to friction or work, and no gain due to the
application of work.
Impeller Pump Impeller
33
Single Suction Impeller Impeller and volute
End Suction Pump; Single Suction Impeller
Gauge TapsGauge Taps
DrainDrain
SealSeal
BearingBearing
Slinger Ring
Slinger Ring
SuctionSuction
DischargeDischarge
ShaftShaft
Typical Impellers
Single Suction Double Suction
34
Impeller DynamicsVR
VT
VS
Vanes
Rota
tion
VT = Tangential Velocity
VR = Radial Velocity
VS = Vector SumFullSize
Impeller
Impeller Dynamics
VR
VT
VS
80%
80%
12 80%QQ
Rota
tion
VT = Tangential Velocity
VR = Radial Velocity
VS = Vector SumTrimmedImpeller
Impeller Types
• Open
• Semi-open
• Closed
- Single suction
- Double suction
• Non-clogging
• Axial flow
• Mixed flow
Seals
Shaft
ProcessFluid
Leakage
Environment VesselWall
35
Typical Mechanical Seal
• Normal to HVAC Pump Construction
– Circulating fluid flushes and cools faces
– “2” Seals
– Many seal materials based on application
Pump Seal Detail
Ceramic Seal InsertGraphite Seal Ring
Compression Ring
Impeller
Retainer (Sec Seal)
Gasket
Rotary Assy
Stationary Assembly
Secondary Seal (Seal Bellows)
Seal Lubrication– Separate surfaces
– Prevent contact of high surface points
– Reduce friction / heat
– Carry away the heat that is generated
Separation
Lubricant
Heat
StationaryCeramic
RotatingGraphite
Seal Cavity
36
Suction Piping Detail
5 dia.
1. Pipe supported2. Length of suction
piping allows even impeller loading
RIGHT WRONG
1. Pipe weight hangs on pump flange.
2. Short suction pipe results in uneven impeller loading.
Why 5 Diameters?
Suction Diffusers Suction Diffusers
37
Construction
Orifice Cylinder Full-LengthStraightening Vanes
EPDM O-RingBronze Start-Up Strainer
Installation
Suction Diffuser
ToPumpTo
Pump
FromSystemFrom
System
SupportFoot
SupportFootStraightening
VanesStraightening
Vanes
AccessRequired
Pump Curve
38
Curve Construction
Tota
l Hea
d In
Fee
t
Capacity In US Gallons Per Minute
1
2
3
4
Water Horsepower Input
Tota
l Hea
d In
Fee
t
Capacity In US Gallons Per Minute
Hor
sep
ower
Inp
ut
Head Capacity
Water H.P.Input
Water horsepower
WHP=Flow x Head x SG÷3960
BHP and WHP
Tota
l Hea
d In
Fee
t
Capacity In US Gallons Per Minute
Hor
sep
ower
Inp
ut
Head Capacity
WHP
B.H.P. InputTo Shaft
H.P. LostTo Friction
& Recirc.
39
Brake Horsepower
BHP =Flow X Head x Sp. Gr.
3960 x ηPump x ηMotor
BHP Horsepower provided at the motor shaft
Flow GPM through the pump
Head feet of head developed by the pump
ηPump efficiency of the pump at the operating point
3960 constant required to provide consistent units
Where:
Pump Efficiency
HP
HPpump Brake
Waterη
Sources Of Inefficiency
• Bearing friction
• Seal
• Fluid friction
• Recirculation
• Shock losses
Pump Efficiency Curve
Tota
l Hea
d In
Fee
t
Capacity In US Gallons Per Minute
Effic
ienc
y
Head Capacity
Efficiency
MaximumEfficiency
At This Point
40
Multiple Impeller Curves
Tota
l Hea
d In
Fee
t
Capacity In US Gallons Per Minute
Efficiency Curves
Higher RPM Pumps
Tota
l Hea
d In
Fee
t
Capacity In US Gallons Per Minute
Efficiency Curves
Speed Effects
Tota
l Hea
d In
Fee
t
Capacity In US Gallons Per Minute
1100 RPM 1700 RPM 3500 RPM
Pump Impeller vs. Horsepower
Tota
l Hea
d In
Fee
t
Capacity In US Gallons Per Minute
15 HP
10 HP
7.5 HP5 HP
9½"
8¾
8"
7¼"
41
3 HP2 HP
Non-Overloading Motor Selection
Non-Overloading Motor Selection
Speed vs. Horsepower
Tota
l Hea
d In
Fee
t
Capacity In US Gallons Per Minute
15 HP1750 RPM
10 HP
7.5 HP5 HP
9½"
Net Positive Suction Head Required Why Worry About Cavitation?
• Noise
• Performance
• Damage
• To What?
– Pipes
– Valves
– Pumps
42
What’s Going On?
1 2
3
4
5
1 2 3 4 5
Entr
ance
Los
s
Fric
tion
Loss
Hyd
raul
ic S
hock
(Tur
bule
nce)
Pres
sure
Incr
ease
From
Impe
ller
Pres
sure
Pump Curve
NPSHRNPSHR
20
10
0
NPSHRNPSHR
Minimum Head Required To Prevent Cavitation
Minimum Head Required To Prevent Cavitation
NPSHRNPSHR
Hydraulic Institute Standards
• ANSI/HI 9.6.1 (1998)
• NPSHR
– NPSHR Of A Pump Is The NPSH That Will Cause The Total Head (First Stage Head For Multi-Stage Pumps) To Be Reduced 3%, Due To Flow Blockage From Cavitation Vapor In The Impeller Vanes
NPSHRNPSHR
NPSHRNPSHR
20
10
0
3% HeadDeviation& InducedCavitation
3% HeadDeviation& InducedCavitation
43
• Cavitation Does Not Start At NPSHR
• The Starting Point Of Cavitation Is Referred To As Incipient Cavitation
– Incipient Cavitation Can Be From 2 to 20 Times the 3% NPSHR Value
– Magnitude Depends On Pump Design
NPSH Margin Recommendations
• Cooling Towers– Low Energy 1.3 or 3 Feet Whichever Is Greater
– High Energy 1.5 or 5 Feet Whichever Is Greater
• General Industry– Low Energy 1.1 or 2 Feet Whichever Is Greater
– High Energy 1.2 or 3 Feet Whichever Is Greater
• Building Services– Low Energy 1.1 or 2 Feet Whichever Is Greater
– High Energy 1.3 or 5 Feet Whichever Is Greater
NPSHANPSHR
Issues
• Extra Margin May Be Required To Account For Pump Wear
• Suction Piping
– In General >5 Diameters LONG Radius Elbow
– >8 Diameters Short Radius Elbow
– Manifolds
D2 D2L2
L2
L1
D1
D2/D1 L1 L2
≥0.3 ≥2D1 ≥5D2
≥0.3 ≥2D1 ≥5D2
Avoiding The Issue
• Choose The Right Pump
– Avoid Pump Curve Extremes
Design Flow
Flow
Hea
dH
ead
44
Shape of The Curve
Tota
l Hea
d In
Fee
t
Capacity In US Gallons Per Minute
Steep Curve
Flat Curve
BEP
Affinity Laws
11
22 Q
DD
Q
11
22 Q
RR
Q
1
2
1
22 H
DD
H
1
3
1
22 P
DD
P
1
2
1
22 H
RR
H
1
3
1
22 P
RR
P
GPM Capacity Ft. Head Brake H.P.
Dia
met
erSp
eed
Q = FlowD = Imp. Diam.
H = Head P= PowerR = Speed
Pump Selection for Best Operation
Hig
h Te
mp
erat
ure
Rise
Low
Flo
w C
avita
tion
Low
Bea
ring
& S
eal L
ife
Red
uced
Impe
ller L
ife
Suct
ion
Reci
rcul
atio
nBE
P
Cav
itati
on
Low
Bea
ring
&Se
al L
ife
Dis
char
ge R
ecirc
ulat
ion
% Flow
% H
ead
% R
elia
bili
ty
η x 0.92
η x 0.53
η x 0.1
η
Good Practice-30% to +15%
Better Practice-20% to +10%
Best Practice-10% to +5%
Of BEP
CharacteristicLife ~ MTBF
Why is Pump Requirement 240 GPM @ 120 Feet?
• Pump Energy Is Absorbed By System
• How Much?
– Pump Is Putting Energy In That Meets The Specific Flow And Head That System Will Take
– What Will The System Take… As Much As Pump Will Give!
• The Flow In The System Is A Balance Of The Pump Capacity and The System Capacity
• We Need To Understand Pumps and Systems
45
Closed Loop Circulating System
AB
f
2b
bb
P
2a
aa h
gV
ZWP
Eg
VZ
WP
22
f
2a
2b
abab
P hg
Vg
VZZ
WP
WP
E
22
Closed Loop Circulating System
AB
f
2b
bb
P
2a
aa h
gV
ZWP
Eg
VZ
WP
22
fP hE
Calculated Pump Requirement
• Add All Terminal Flows
– Total All Branch Flows In GPM
• Select Greatest Hydraulic Pressure Loss Circuit
– Branch Loss + Shared Riser Piping; 66 Feet of Head
– Pressure Independent Control Valve; 11 Feet
– Total Head Loss 110 - 119 Feet if we worry about fittings, service valves, etc.
• Pump Requirement Is Required Flow @ Required Head; 240 GPM @ 120 Feet of head
46
5¾”
• “2½AB” Operating Point
– 240 GPM @ 120 Ft
– η = 74%
– 10 HP @ Design
– 15 HP Motor for NOL
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
Plot Your Pump Curve… Analyze System Flow & Head Relationship
• Q1 = Know (design) Flow
• Q2 = Final Flow
• h1 = Know (design) Head
• h2 = Final Head
1
2
2
1
2
hh
47
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
1
2
2
1
2
h
h
Q
Q
Draw System Curve
00960
3612063160
120220155250
HeadFlow
Pumps in Parallel
System Head
1/2 system flow
1/2 system flow
• Size pump piping for total flow• Select pumps for ½ design flow and full head
Specification
• 1400 Total GPM• 72.5 Ft. Head• 2 Pumps In Parallel• 4 BC Pump
Specification
• 1400 Total GPM• 72.5 Ft. Head• 2 Pumps In Parallel• 4 BC Pump
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 100200
300400
500600
700800
9001000
11001200
48
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 100200
300400
500600
700800
9001000
11001200
550≈ GPM
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 100200
300400
500600
700800
9001000
11001200
13001400
15001600
17001800
19002000
21002200
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 100200
300400
500600
700800
9001000
11001200
13001400
15001600
17001800
19002000
21002200
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 100200
300400
500600
700800
9001000
11001200
850 GPM
49
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 100200
300400
500600
700800
9001000
11001200
13001400
15001600
17001800
19002000
21002200 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 100200
300400
500600
700800
9001000
11001200
13001400
15001600
17001800
19002000
21002200
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 100200
300400
500600
700800
9001000
11001200
13001400
15001600
17001800
19002000
21002200
Head72.5'@GPM1400
PointFixedhh
CurveSystem
1
2
1
2
2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 100200
300400
500600
700800
9001000
11001200
13001400
15001600
17001800
19002000
21002200
Design Point1400 @ 72.5’
Each PumpOperates At700 @ 72.5’
One PumpOperates To1050 @ 72.5’
And Is OnCurve
50
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 100200
300400
500600
700800
9001000
11001200
13001400
15001600
17001800
19002000
21002200
10 HP
15 HP
20 HP
Check Pump Horsepower Operating Points
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 100200
300400
500600
700800
9001000
11001200
13001400
15001600
17001800
19002000
21002200
Design Point1400 @ 72.5’
Parallel Pumping
• Selection– One Half Design Flow At Design Head
– Two Equally Sized Pumps
– PUMP CONTROLLER
• Technique– Safety: System Curve Intersects Both Curves At
Design Condition
• Benefit– Instead of 2 full sized pumps, 2 half size
– Staging; Most of year is with one pump not two
Problem
51
195 GPM 81% Design210 GPM
• 1 Pump: 87% Design Flow
Discussion
• Same pump, different size impellers depending on accuracy of calculation
• 80%+ design flow on one pump operation, reasonable efficiency 66%
• 7.5 BHP
• Backup pump with low hours
Primary-Secondary System Allows Separation of Equipment Losses
52
What Is Primary Secondary?What Is Primary Secondary?
• Method Of Breaking Systems Into Smaller More Manageable Sub-Systems
• Hydraulically and Thermodynamically Isolates One System From Other
• Instead Of One Large Pump Two (or more) Small Pumps
Primary Secondary Issue
• Coordination of Primary & Secondary Flows
– Causes Mixing
– Mixing Point Moves
• Returning to Source, Poor ΔT
• Returning to Field, Reduced Heat Transfer Performance & Increased System Flow
• Traditional VSVF Systems; “Low Delta T”
– Move Towards VSVF Primary & Secondary
SEGMENT A B C 1-2 2-3 3-4-6 3-5-6 6-7 2-8 8-10-11 8-9-11 11-7 7-12 D E FFlow 240 160 80 80 40 20 20 40 40 20 20 40 80 80 160 240Size 4" 3" 2.5" 2.5 1.5 1.25 1.25 1.5 1.5 1.25 1.25 1.5 2.5 2.5" 3" 4"
Length 100' 20' 20' 30 30 60 60 30 30 60 60 30 30 20' 20' 100'HF Rate 3 5.5 4.5 4.5 12.5 9 9 12.5 12.5 9 9 12.5 4.5 4.5 5.5 3
Friction Loss 3 1.1 0.9 1.35 3.75 5.4 5.4 3.75 3.75 5.4 5.4 3.75 1.35 0.9 1.1 3Fittings 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Service Valves 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Coil 17 17 17 17
Control ValveBalance Valve
Source 30Total 5 3.1 2.9 3.35 7.75 26.4 26.4 7.75 7.75 26.4 26.4 7.75 5.35 4.9 5.1 37
PATHTOTAL
A-1-2-3-4-6-7-12-F 5 3.35 7.75 26.4 7.75 5.35 37 92.6A-1-2-3-5-6-7-12-F 5 3.35 7.75 26.4 7.75 5.35 37 92.6
A-1-2-8-10-11-7-12-F 5 3.35 7.75 26.4 7.75 5.35 37 92.6A-1-2-8-9-11-7-12-F 5 3.35 7.75 26.4 7.75 5.35 37 92.6
A-B-1-2-3-4-6-7-12-E-F 5 3.1 3.35 7.75 26.4 7.75 5.35 5.1 37 100.8A-B-1-2-3-5-6-7-12-E-F 5 3.1 3.35 7.75 26.4 7.75 5.35 5.1 37 100.8
A-B-1-2-8-10-11-7-12-E-F 5 3.1 3.35 7.75 26.4 7.75 5.35 5.1 37 100.8A-B-1-2-8-9-11-7-12-E-F 5 3.1 3.35 7.75 26.4 7.75 5.35 5.1 37 100.8
A-B-C-1-2-3-4-6-7-12-D-E-F 5 3.1 2.9 3.35 7.75 26.4 7.75 5.35 4.9 5.1 37 108.6A-B-C-1-2-3-5-6-7-12-D-E-F 5 3.1 2.9 3.35 7.75 26.4 7.75 5.35 4.9 5.1 37 108.6
A-B-C-1-2-8-10-11-7-12-D-E-F 5 3.1 2.9 3.35 7.75 26.4 7.75 5.35 4.9 5.1 37 108.6A-B-C-1-2-8-9-11-7-12-D-E-F 5 3.1 2.9 3.35 7.75 26.4 7.75 5.35 4.9 5.1 37 108.6
• Two pumps– Source 240 GPM @ 30 Ft.– Load 240 GPM @ 90 Ft.
Primary Secondary Layout
53
Further Definition
• Primary: 240 GPM@ 58 Ft. 4.7 BHP
Further Definition
• Three Secondary Pumps (Floor Zones) 80 GPM@53 Ft
Discussion
• Horsepower 10.25
– 3 x 1.85
– 1 x 4.7
• Smaller pumps less expensive, but maybe not in total
• Easier expansion, simpler management
– May offer operating benefit to non-variable flow source
Implied Control
• Controllability ~ Constants
•Water Flow: Keep System Differential Pressure Constant
–Old Paradigm: Apply Constant Speed Flat Curve Pumps
–Adjust All Hydronic Loops To Same Friction Loss
54
Horsepower Is Reduced
5 HP
3 HP
Variable Speed Pumping
• Controllability ~ Constants– Water Flow: Keep System
Differential Pressure Constant
• New Paradigm: Variable Speed Pumps – System Differential Changes
In Reaction To Valve Position
– Control Valve Requires the Same Control Influence as Previously, But Lower Differential Heads Bring Out Selection Mistakes
Variable Speed Pump Paradox Solved, Energy Saved
5 HP
¼ HP
Hea
d Red
uced
80%
+
Speed = 100%
Speed = 37%
Variable Speed Pump Application
• Ideal “Engineering” form of hydronic control; Energy Saving
– Coils operate 80% year with 50% of flow or less
– 50% flow ≈ 12.5% Brake Horsepower
• In our problem, we would probably go with 2 pumps in parallel at ½ Flow and full head
• Review and understand Balancing & Controls
55
Typical Variable Speed Setup
Path P3
Path P1
Path P2
Power
SpeedDrive
Differential Pressure Sensor
PumpControl
Varia
ble
Hea
d
Variable H
ead
Controlled Head(Constant)
Example
Path P3
Path P2
Differential Pressure Sensor
20 20
202020
100
100
200
20
BV
0
BV
?
A
B
C
F
E
D
Path With Design Head
100
100
Flow
100206020Balanced
6020402020Head
E-FBVB-EA-BPath 2
1002020202020Head
E-FD-EC-DB-CA-BPath 3
Both Valves 50%
50
50
Flow
?5?5Head
100206020Balanced
6020402020Design
E-FBVB-EA-BPath 2
40552055Head
1002020202020Design
E-FD-EC-DB-CA-BPath 3
56
Paradigm Change
• System Curve Implies 1 Flow, 1 Head• Variable Speed Does Not Follow; Why?
0
50
0
100
100
Path 3
2000
4010050
30100100
701000
100200100
TDHFlowPath 2
1
2
2
1
2
h
h
Q
Q
Evaluate Using Flow Coefficient
Path P3
Path P2
20 20
202020
100
100
20
BV
0
BV
40
A
B
C
F
E
D 3420/2.31
100C
tCoefficienFlow P3
V
19.660/2.31
100C
tCoefficienFlow P2
V
Control Area
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 50 100 150 200
Balancing Implication
• This Is The Classic (ASHRAE) Balancing Argument– “Balancing ruins the control valve”
• Excess Balancing Valve Drop Causes Skewed Flow Performance– “Must use high performance valve”– “I don’t like the “extra” pressure drop you have to use for a flow
limiter…”• No; 80% wrong
– 80% Fallacy• Balance provides functionality when all TC valves are open• TC Valve control does not recognize changes in system differential
pressure• Flow limiters don’t add extra pressure drop when properly applied
– 20% Right?• Static balance does skew improperly sequenced VSVF pump systems
• This is a control set point problem, not a balance problem
57
Set Point = 20 Ft
B
C
D
E
F
G
b
c
d
e
f
g
0.7
0
CV
1
CV
2
CV
3
CV
4
CV
5
CV
6
0.7
0
1.38 1.38
1.16 1.16
1.58 1.58
1.5 1.5
A a
0 0 0
7.1 7.1 5.7
5.9 5.9 9.5
5.4 5.4 13
5.1 5.1 16.3
4.9 4.9 19.6
01000
2X 4 =0
8452000
2X 4 =0.7
845+7713000
2X 4 =1.16
23504000
2X 4 =1.38
30645000
2X 4 =1.5
37676000
2X 4 =1.58
845
771
735
714
701
3767
3767 GPM @ 32.7’Flow (USGPM)
Hea
d (F
eet)
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
0.0 1000.0 2000.0 3000.0 4000.0 5000.0 6000.0
Inner Valves Close Head
Outer Valves CLose
System Curve
Valve 1 Closed
Valve 6 & 5 Closed
Valve 1-3 Closed
Valve 6 Closed
Valve 6-4 Closed
Valve 1 & 2 Closed
Plot of Valve & Head Combinations
In VSVF Hydronic Systems of Any Type
• Control valves will change system flow greater than the control valve selection
• This can effect control system stability in
– Chiller staging
– Pump staging
– Other circuits temperature control
• There’s more to it than just the valve!
Variable Speed Pumping
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
n=100%
n=90%
n=80%
n=60%n=50%
n=70%
n=30%n=40%
The idea of Variable Speed Pumping is to have even speed transition proportional to changes in head and flow
58
Variable Speed Pumping
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
ΔP
Normal pump control often uses a controlled differential pressure across one or more branches that indicate changes in building load (implication)
Variable Speed Pumping
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
ΔP ~ Gain
However, pump and system curve intersection should be steep enough so that a change in flow rate actually yields a change in differential head significant enough to get the control algorithm to modify pump speed in a reasonable increment
Variable Speed Pumping
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
Valve ΔPChangesRadically The old “flat curve” pump characteristic
could hurt system performance, the pump speed controller could easily jump from full speed to much less (100% to 40%) causing improper control throughout all affected but non connected loops (Chillers, towers, pump stage, etc.). Remember: the valve controller always thinks it has a predictable characteristic because of constant ΔP across it.
“Traditional” Balance Valves
• Static: Circuit Setter
• Dynamic: Griswold, Circuit Sentry
Just Provide Maximum Flow Protection
– Static Valves Proportionally Balance; Only Have 75% Pump All Valves Get 75% (Constant Speed Pumps, Not Variable Speed)
– Dynamics Clip Excess Flows & Lose Balance Effects When Required (Variable Speed Pumps)
59
Variable Speed Pump Paradox Solved, Energy Saved
5 HP
¼ HP
Hea
d Red
uced
80%
+
Speed = 100%
Speed = 37%
Variable Speed Pump Paradox
• Big Energy Savings
– Coil; Little Flow… Lots of Heat Transfer
– Hydraulics; Change Pump Speed, Change Valve and Heat Transfer Predictability… Lose Control
• PIC Valves; Can Stop Over Flow and Maintain 100% Valve Authority, 100% Control Predictability
PIC Valves with Flow Setting
• Lift & Turn To Percentage of Rated Flow
• Lack traditional proportionality of static balance, although the “control valve” can now control and provide such…impossible with standard ATC valves
• Provide majority of system required features and benefits
Summary/Tips• Load analysis
– Tip: If you have to apply a diversity factor do not factor it into pump or pipe sizing.
• Flow– Overflowing coils does not add appreciable heat transfer…it takes surface
area. Slightly oversize the coil and then operate at a lower temperature.
• Pipe– You only install it once. Spend the money on larger pipe to reduce head
loss. Be very judicious in applying any diversity when sizing pipe.
• Pumps– Often cost more to run in one year than they cost to install.– No head, no flow. – Learn more; study up on variable speed pump application.
• Controls– Modulate coils and use VS pumps. Carefully coordinate control valve and
spend the extra cash to apply pressure independent control valves
60
Just About Quittin’ Time!
• There’s a lot more to know!– We didn’t cover air and pressure management
– Many variations on systems and materials
– Practice lots!
• We did not cover Open Systems (Cooling Towers)
• Most of our discussion is applicable to all system designs– Keep sense of relativity
A difference to be a difference must be a big enough difference to make a difference!
…Gil Carlson